DOCSLIB.ORG

A Thesis School of Graduate Studies Addis Ababa University in Partial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Thesis School of Graduate Studies Addis Ababa University in Partial A BTUJlY ON SOlIS EGOLOGICJIL ASP.o;CTS Ob' THE GIAWJ: HOI)l~ ... R~'.'r T.'\CHYOnYC~E's HACnOCEPHALUS (nUPPEI,L,184z). IN lYILic HOUNTJ\INS, ETHIOPIA A Thesis Presented to School of Graduate Studies Addis Ababa University In Partial Fulfillment of tho Requirement for the Degree Muater of Sci onCe in Biology By Shimelis Beyene June 1986 i endemic to Ethiopia, waG 13i~u'li2d in two ohservutio!l llre~s at Bale Mountains National I'&lk i]l south eastern Ethiopia~ The burrow system 8Y.:cavated revBaled extensive underground tunnels, material consisting exclusively of grasses knitted into a hollow ball. One to several blind tlmnels ;iere found filled with foods to res and faec BE>. rJ~he underground tunnel SYR tems \'Jere marked by soil moundG, Garth plugs, foraging holes and haypiles resembled those of pocket gophers. Mole-rats spent an ave~Rge of about 70 minlltes a day on the surface, mainly foraL:inp; tut £1.1so observing ana. digging Q The time spent on the surface by mole-rats at high altitude was significantly greater thc1.n that spent by mole-rats .:;l.t low al ti tude. This difference appea.red to be related to the difference in vegetation cover. The populatiDn d(.nc;i ty of mole-rats 'lias estimated to be about 6000 mole-rats per kr/ at Sanetti and 570 mole-rats per 2 km at Badeae 0 l'his difference in population donai ty ;\'a8 probably due to differences in [;oil and vegetation types, it CompGtion with dom;)stic live stock at lovler al ti tudes might have also contributed. Mole-rats restricted their activities to the parts of their burrow system at higher ground in the vIet season and became freq~ently active in t11e tunnels at lower ground in the dry season. ii The major pr8datQ~ nrpc~rJd to be the Simioll fox (Canis .~ .. ----. Comparison '.';i th ot.'iel" rodent moles (Bathyergidae, Spalacidae Geomyidae) showed many conver~~ailt characteristics as a result of . t' the1r suberrane~n arlaptD.tion,s 0;> iii I wou].d like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Dr. J.G. Hillman whose extremely valuable advice and assistance made this study possible, I thank Dr, Hillman also for his permission to use his laboratory facilities at Dinsho and his equipment in the field, Dr. Hillman also offered helpful criticism of this manuscript. I am deeply indepted to Dr. Shibru Tedla, who suggested the title of this study, for his unfailing encouragement and for solving administrative problems. I would like to express illy sincere appreciation to Ato. Afework Bakele for his valuable advice and Dr. Amha Belay for his encouragement and f~r solving administrative problems. I am very grateful to Mr. 11. 'fakeishi, Kyushu Uni versi ty, Japan; Prof, D.'''. Yalden, Hanchester University, England; Prof. J.U.H.'Jarvis, University of Gape Town, South Africa; Prof. E. Neva, University of Haifa, Israel and Dr•. i,R., Arieli t , .Tel' A11i1l University, Israel for their important advice, suggestions and for sending me reprints. ~!y deep gratitude is extended to Dr, D, Humber and Wrt. Elizabeth Kebede for critically reading this manuscript. Hy sincere thanks must go to Dr. Zerihun Woldu who determined the cover abundance of plants and identified the plants. iv I would like to thank the staff of the Ethiopian ~ildlife Conservation Organization. In particular, Ato Teshome Ashine for his permission to work in Bale Mountains National Park, Ato Leyikun Abune, Ato TOflf3_ye Hundessa, Ato Abdu Mv.hamuod and Ato Tadesse Gebre Hichael for their encouragement and help. I am also grateful to Dr. Ermias Bakele, Ato T"shome Demssie and Ato loIulugata Ayele for havine facilitated the permission and to get attached to the ~'lildlife Conservation Organization. Ny thanks must go to the staff of Bale Nountains National Park. In particular, Ato Yitayale Kebede, Ato Hohamed Abdi, Ato Petros Andamo and Ato Neseret for their kind help in the field and for allowing me to use the park facilities. I gratefully acknowledge the Swedish Agency for Research Cooperation (SAREC) for financial support used to cover part of the expenses incurred in tllis work. Finally, I would like to express my warmest appreciation to all my friends who helped in this work in one way or another. v l~BSTRi\CT ..•.•..•.•••••••.••••••••.•••••••••••••••••..••••• ACKNOiILEDGEf.lENTS ..•..••••..•.•..•••••••..•.•••..••.•••.••• TJ-,\BLE OF CONTEt~~rS ••••••.•••••••••••••••••.•••••••.••.••••. LIST OF TABLES •.•..•••••.••.•••.•••••..•••.••..•...•..•.•. LI.:3T OF FIGURES ......•.••..•..•........................... INTRODUCTION .• . .. .............................. 1 THE STUDY Al'Ef, ....•••••• 5 Sanetti plateauo ..... ~." ...... o •••• o •• ~................. 5 Badeae .•.. ~ ........ t ... " I> 0 ..... 0 •• 0 .. .. .. • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • 6 DISTRIBUTION .... ' ........................... 9 HATERIALS AND Hj'THODS. • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • . • • . • • 12 Trapping 0 • 00 ... 0 ...... " .... "" ... " ....... " ..... ~ .......... '"'' •• 16 ) LITERATUllE REVIK!I. ..00.·.0 ...... 00 ...................... 17 Burrow System. 00 ... 0 •••••••••••••••••••• 17 Mole-hill (Soil wound). .o •.• o.~.· ......... · ..•. o 18 Hay pile ........... 0 ....... 0 .. .. • • • • • .. • .. .. • .. .. • .. • • • .. .. • .. .. • • • 19 Foraging tunnels .......... "~~ ....... " •• o,, ........... , 19 Nest .......... " ......... oo ......... 0 ......... o" •• • ••••••••• 20 Food stor~ chambers .. .0" .... 0 ................. " ...... 22 Bolt-hrle. ...... ~ ...... o .... " •• ooo ... " •••••• o ••••• oo ..... 22 Sani tory ch[unbers .. " .. <> " ............................................ ~ 23 Empty chambers ....... " .. 0 .... ~ ...... 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. • • .. .. .. .. .. .. 24 vi Page Activi ty llbvoe Ground" ........ 0" ••• • ..... 0 ••••••••• 24 Observing 0 • ...... 000 ......................... 25 :F'oragi11g........................................... .................... ........ 26 Digging • ••••• _0 ................................ 2\l Feeding •.••• ....................................... 27 Population Density ..................... " .............................. .. 27 Predation . •••••• 00.0" ............................ 29 RESULTS III ............ .. ••••••••••••••••• 0.00 •••••••••••••••••• 31 Trapping ........... " ............................. 31 Burrow System. ••••••••• 00 •••••••••••••• , •••••••• 31 Soil mound • ................. 00 .................... 32 Hay pile" ............. .. • ., .. 00" ••••••• " ••••••••••••••••.• 32 Foraging tunnels • ................................ 0 .••• 35 Nest •• " •••••••• , ••••• " ................................. 35 Food store. •••• 0 •••• 0 ..... 00 ...................... ,. 35 Exposed parts of burrow system.".""."." ••••• "" _.. 38 vii Activity Above Ground ......... "." ................ "..... 24 Observing" ..................... " •• " ............ " • • • • 25 }'ora,gill(~ ....... 0 ........ " ... II •• " ••••• , ••• <> • • • .. • • • • • 26 Digging ........................................... 26 Feeding" ..... " ••• " .... " ........... , ................ " ••• " • • 27 Population Density. <I" ....... """" ..... " ...... " •• ",, ... ,,""" 27 Predation ••••• , ................................. ~ ••••• 29 RES ULTS •• " •• " .. " • " " ............ " ... " .......... " • " •• , ........ , " .• , • • • 31 Trapping .... " .. " " ••• " • " ...... 0 " ••• 0 " 0 " " " ••• " ... " " " • " .... " , 31 Burro\'1 System""" .. " ................ " ...................... ""... 31 Soil Inound .... " ............. ~ ................. "..... 32 Hay pi 1 e ....... , ....... " ..................... " . • • .. • • • 32 }l'oraging tunnels ...................... "............ 35 Nest ......... ........... 0 .... ., .................... 35 Food store •••• 0 .......... , ........... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. " 35 Exposed parts of burrow system ••••••• o......... 38 Activity Above Ground • .................................. o.~ 44 Observing" ................ 0 ........................... 44 Foraging ... ••••••• 00 ............................. " ••• 44 Digging, •• .......................................... 0 ••• 46 Total a.ctivity, ..... " ................................. 49 Po pula tion Densi ty, , ··.·0' .......... 00 •• " ............... 53 Predation, 0 •••••••••• 00 ......................... ••• 0 53 Breeding. 0' .... 00 ...................................... 54 viii Social Organization ......... ~ • 0 ........ o ......... ~ ...... Season3.1 l1igration ........................ 0 • • • • •• • • • • • •• • 56 Estimation of Cover JlbundnncG of plants.............. 57 DISCUSSION ••..•.••••••••••••••••••••.••••••....•••••.•...• 61 Burro\v Syst81n ~ ......................... " • • • • • •• • • • •• •• • 61 Soil mounds .................... 0 ............. ,. .. • •• ••• 61 Hay pile ..... 0 ....................................' • • • • 62 Foraging tunnels ~. , ..... 0 ........ 0 • 0 ......... " •• 0.. .. 63 Nest D.nd nesting Hl.:1torials ~.......................... 67 }c'ood store ........................ 0 • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 69 Bolt-hole ............................................ 70 Exposed parts of burrow system....................... 71 Activi ty Above Ground·••••••••••• 0.. •• • • • •• • • •••• .... .... 72 Observing ..................- ............... '" •• '" •• • • • 72 Foraging ................... ~ •••.•.•.•• 5 ............. 73 Digging ......... " ........................................... 74 Total activity........................................... 75 'Population Density... ••••••••••••.••••..• ••.••.••••••
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blind Mole Rat (Spalax Leucodon) Masseter Muscle: Structure, Homology, Diversification and Nomenclature A
    Folia Morphol. Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 419–424 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2018.0097 O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E Copyright © 2019 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 journals.viamedica.pl Blind mole rat (Spalax leucodon) masseter muscle: structure, homology, diversification and nomenclature A. Yoldas1, M. Demir1, R. İlgun2, M.O. Dayan3 1Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey 2Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey 3Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey [Received: 10 July 2018; Accepted: 23 September 2018] Background: It is well known that rodents are defined by a unique masticatory apparatus. The present study describes the design and structure of the masseter muscle of the blind mole rat (Spalax leucodon). The blind mole rat, which emer- ged 5.3–3.4 million years ago during the Late Pliocene period, is a subterranean, hypoxia-tolerant and cancer-resistant rodent. Yet, despite these impressive cha- racteristics, no information exists on their masticatory musculature. Materials and methods: Fifteen adult blind mole rats were used in this study. Dissections were performed to investigate the anatomical characteristics of the masseter muscle. Results: The muscle was comprised of three different parts: the superficial mas- seter, the deep masseter and the zygomaticomandibularis muscle. The superficial masseter originated from the facial fossa at the ventral side of the infraorbital foramen. The deep masseter was separated into anterior and posterior parts. The anterior part of the zygomaticomandibularis muscle arose from the snout and passed through the infraorbital foramen to connect on the mandible.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Communication Signals in the Blind Mole-Rat (Spalax Ehrenbergi ): Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for Their Processing by the Auditory System
    J Comp Physiol A (1998) 183: 503±511 Ó Springer-Verlag 1998 ORIGINAL PAPER R. Rado á J. Terkel á Z. Wollberg Seismic communication signals in the blind mole-rat (Spalax ehrenbergi ): electrophysiological and behavioral evidence for their processing by the auditory system Accepted: 11 May 1998 Abstract Based on morphological and behavioral ®nd- ings we suggest that the seismic vibratory signals that Introduction blind mole-rats (Spalax ehrenbergi) use for intraspeci®c communication are picked up from the substrate by The blind mole-rat, Spalax ehrenbergi, is a subterranean bone conduction and processed by the auditory system. rodent that shows striking behavioral, morphological An alternative hypothesis, raised by others, suggest that and physiological adaptations to fossorial life (Nevo these signals are processed by the somatosensory sys- 1979, 1982). It is a highly solitary species that digs its tem. We show here that brain stem and middle latency tunnel system to its own size, and which it never leaves responses evoked by vibrations are similar to those unless forced to (Nevo 1961). Encounters between in- evoked by high-intensity airborne clicks but are larger in dividuals are very rare and are limited to the mating their amplitudes, especially when the lower jaw is in season, to contacts between mother and pups, and to close contact with the vibrating substrate. Bilateral incidental intrusion of an individual to a foreign tunnel deafening of the mole-rat or high-intensity masking system. noise almost completely eliminated these responses. We and others have shown that for long-distance Deafening also gradually reduced head-drumming be- communication this subterranean rodent uses vibratory havior until its complete elimination about 4±6 weeks (seismic) signals that are produced by rapidly tapping its after surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Ensembl (Www
    Lin et al. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:32 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/15/32 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Transcriptome sequencing and phylogenomic resolution within Spalacidae (Rodentia) Gong-Hua Lin1, Kun Wang2, Xiao-Gong Deng1,3, Eviatar Nevo4, Fang Zhao1, Jian-Ping Su1, Song-Chang Guo1, Tong-Zuo Zhang1* and Huabin Zhao5* Abstract Background: Subterranean mammals have been of great interest for evolutionary biologists because of their highly specialized traits for the life underground. Owing to the convergence of morphological traits and the incongruence of molecular evidence, the phylogenetic relationships among three subfamilies Myospalacinae (zokors), Spalacinae (blind mole rats) and Rhizomyinae (bamboo rats) within the family Spalacidae remain unresolved. Here, we performed de novo transcriptome sequencing of four RNA-seq libraries prepared from brain and liver tissues of a plateau zokor (Eospalax baileyi) and a hoary bamboo rat (Rhizomys pruinosus), and analyzed the transcriptome sequences alongside a published transcriptome of the Middle East blind mole rat (Spalax galili). We characterize the transcriptome assemblies of the two spalacids, and recover the phylogeny of the three subfamilies using a phylogenomic approach. Results: Approximately 50.3 million clean reads from the zokor and 140.8 million clean reads from the bamboo ratwere generated by Illumina paired-end RNA-seq technology. All clean reads were assembled into 138,872 (the zokor) and 157,167 (the bamboo rat) unigenes, which were annotated by the public databases: the Swiss-prot, Trembl, NCBI non-redundant protein (NR), NCBI nucleotide sequence (NT), Gene Ontology (GO), Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Rodents and Insectivores of the Mordovia, Russia
    ZooKeys 1004: 129–139 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1004.57359 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of rodents and insectivores of the Mordovia, Russia Alexey V. Andreychev1, Vyacheslav A. Kuznetsov1 1 Department of Zoology, National Research Mordovia State University, Bolshevistskaya Street, 68. 430005, Saransk, Russia Corresponding author: Alexey V. Andreychev ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. López-Antoñanzas | Received 7 August 2020 | Accepted 18 November 2020 | Published 16 December 2020 http://zoobank.org/C127F895-B27D-482E-AD2E-D8E4BDB9F332 Citation: Andreychev AV, Kuznetsov VA (2020) Checklist of rodents and insectivores of the Mordovia, Russia. ZooKeys 1004: 129–139. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1004.57359 Abstract A list of 40 species is presented of the rodents and insectivores collected during a 15-year period from the Republic of Mordovia. The dataset contains more than 24,000 records of rodent and insectivore species from 23 districts, including Saransk. A major part of the data set was obtained during expedition research and at the biological station. The work is based on the materials of our surveys of rodents and insectivo- rous mammals conducted in Mordovia using both trap lines and pitfall arrays using traditional methods. Keywords Insectivores, Mordovia, rodents, spatial distribution Introduction There is a need to review the species composition of rodents and insectivores in all regions of Russia, and the work by Tovpinets et al. (2020) on the Crimean Peninsula serves as an example of such research. Studies of rodent and insectivore diversity and distribution have a long history, but there are no lists for many regions of Russia of Copyright A.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Pocket Gopher Damage to Conifer Seedlings D.S
    FOREST PROTECTION EC 1255 • Revised May 2003 $2.50 Controlling Pocket Gopher Damage to Conifer Seedlings D.S. deCalesta, K. Asman, and N. Allen Contents ocket gophers (or just plain Gopher habits and habitat.............. 1 P “gophers”) damage conifer seed- Control program ........................... 2 lings on thousands of Identifying the pest ......................2 acres in Washington, Assessing the need for treatment ...3 Idaho, and Oregon Damage control techniques ...........3 annually. They invade clearcuts and Applying controls .......................... 7 clip (cut off) roots or Figure 1.—Typical Oregon pocket gopher. Christmas tree plantations .............7 girdle (remove bark from) the bases of conifer seedlings and saplings, causing significant economic losses. Forest plantations ........................ 7 This publication will help you design a program to reduce or eliminate Summary .................................... 8 gopher damage to seedlings and saplings in your forest plantation or Christmas tree farm. Sources of supply ......................... 8 First, we describe pocket gophers, their habits, and habitats. Then we For further information .................. 8 discuss procedures for controlling pocket gopher damages—control techniques, their effectiveness and hazard(s) to the environment, and their use under a variety of tree-growing situations. Gopher habits and habitat Three species of pocket gopher can damage conifer seedlings. The two smaller ones, the northern pocket gopher and the Mazama pocket gopher, are 5 to 9 inches long and brown with some white beneath the chin and belly. The northern gopher is found east of the Cascade Mountains in Oregon and Washington and in Idaho; the Mazama lives in Oregon and Washington west of the Cascades. David S. deCalesta, former Exten- The Camas pocket gopher is similar looking, but larger (10 to 12 inches) sion wildlife specialist, and Kim than the two others.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Cape Provincial Gazette Vol 15 No
    ·.:.:-:-:-:-:.::p.=~==~ ::;:;:;:;:::::t}:::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:::;:;:.-:-:.:-:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:::-:-:-:-: ..........•............:- ;.:.:.;.;.;.•.;. ::::;:;::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;;:::::. '.' ::: .... , ..:. ::::::::::::::::::::~:~~~~::::r~~~~\~:~ i~ftfj~i!!!J~?!I~~~~I;Ii!!!J!t@tiit):fiftiIit\t~r\t ', : :.;.:.:.:.:.: ::;:;:::::;:::::::::::;:::::::::.::::;:::::::;:::::::::;:;:::;:;:;:;:: :.:.:.: :.:. ::~:}:::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::tf~:::::::::::::::: ;:::;:::;:::;:;:;:::::::::;:;:::::: ::::::;::;:;:;:;=;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;::::::::;:.: :.;.:.:.;.;.:.;.:.:-:.;.: :::;:' """"~'"W" ;~!~!"IIIIIII ::::::::::;:::::;:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:::::..;:;:;:::;: 1111.iiiiiiiiiiii!fillimiDw"""'8m\r~i~ii~:i:] :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:.:.::::::::::::::{::::::::::::;:: ;.;:;:;:;:t;:;~:~;j~Ij~j~)~( ......................: ;.: :.:.:.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.; :.:.;.:.: ':;:::::::::::-:.::::::;:::::;;::::::::::::: EXTRAORDINARY • BUITENGEWONE Provincial Gazette iGazethi YePhondo Kasete ya Profensi Provinsiale Koerant Vol. 15 KIMBERLEY, 19 DECEMBER 2008 DESEMBER No. 1258 PROVINCE OF THE NORTHERN CAPE 2 No. 1258 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 19 DECEMBER 2008 CONTENTS • INHOUD Page Gazette No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICE· ALGEMENE KENNISGEWING 105 Northern Cape Nature Conservation Bill, 2009: For public comment . 3 1258 105 Noord-Kaap Natuurbewaringswetontwerp, 2009: Vir openbare kommentaar . 3 1258 PROVINSIE NOORD-KAAP BUITENGEWONE PROVINSIALE KOERANT, 19 DESEMBER 2008 No.1258 3 GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE
    [Show full text]
  • The Naked Mole-Rat As an Animal Model in Biomedical Research: Current Perspectives
    Open Access Animal Physiology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW The naked mole-rat as an animal model in biomedical research: current perspectives Laura-Nadine Schuhmacher Abstract: The naked mole-rat (NMR) is a subterranean rodent that has gained significant Zoé Husson attention from the biomedical research community in recent years as molecular mechanisms Ewan St. John Smith underlying its unusual biology start to be unraveled. With very low external mortality, NMRs have an unusually long lifespan while showing no signs of aging, such as neuro- Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK degeneration or cancer. Furthermore, living underground in large colonies (100 to 300 animals), results in comparatively high carbon dioxide and low oxygen levels, from which NMRs have evolved extreme resistance to both hypoxia and hypercapnia. In this paper we have summarized the latest developments in NMR research and its impact on biomedical research, with the aim of providing a sound background that will inform and inspire further For personal use only. investigations. Keywords: naked mole-rat, longevity, cancer, hypoxia, nociception, pain Introduction The naked mole-rat (NMR) (Heterocephalus glaber) is a subterranean mammal, which has recently gained interest from scientists across a variety of research fields. Unlike the majority of mammals, NMRs are poikilothermic and eusocial, ie, are cold-blooded and have a single breeding female within a colony.1 In addition to these features, which have limited biomedical translatability, NMRs have also evolved several physiological adaptations to habituate to their extreme environmental conditions, which have led researchers to study this mammal with the hypothesis Open Access Animal Physiology downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 131.111.184.102 on 07-Sep-2017 that by understanding the extreme biology of NMRs, more will be understood about normal mammalian physiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Information Document
    Global coordination project for the SFM Drylands Impact Program Part I: Project Information Name of Parent Program Sustainable Forest Management Impact Program on Dryland Sustainable Landscapes GEF ID 10253 Project Type FSP Type of Trust Fund GET CBIT/NGI CBIT NGI Project Title Global coordination project for the SFM Drylands Impact Program Countries Global Agency(ies) FAO Other Executing Partner(s): IUCN Executing Partner Type GEF Agency GEF Focal Area Multi Focal Area Taxonomy Focal Areas, Climate Change, Climate Change Mitigation, Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use, Technology Transfer, Financing, Forest, Forest and Landscape Restoration, REDD - REDD+, Drylands, Biodiversity, Protected Areas and Landscapes, Productive Landscapes, Terrestrial Protected Areas, Community Based Natural Resource Mngt, Mainstreaming, Forestry - Including HCVF and REDD+, Agriculture and agrobiodiversity, Biomes, Tropical Dry Forests, Desert, Grasslands, Financial and Accounting, Conservation Finance, Payment for Ecosystem Services, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Sustainable Pasture Management, Improved Soil and Water Management Techniques, Integrated and Cross- sectoral approach, Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Income Generating Activities, Sustainable Forest, Ecosystem Approach, Sustainable Fire Management, Sustainable Livelihoods, Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands, Sustainable Agriculture, Drought Mitigation, Land Degradation Neutrality, Land Cover and Land cover change, Land Productivity, Carbon stocks
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Movement by Burrowing Mammals: a Review Comparing Excavation Size and Rate to Body Mass of Excavators
    Soil movement by burrowing mammals: a review comparing excavation size and rate to body mass of excavators Natalie S Haussmann Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, South Africa Corresponding author: Natalie S Haussmann, Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, South Africa. Email: [email protected] Tel: +27 (21) 420 4049 Abstract Mammal burrowing plays an important role in soil translocation and habitat creation in many environments. As a consequence, many burrowing mammals have at some point been studied in an ecosystem engineering context. From a geomorphological point of view, one of the focus areas of burrowing mammal research is on the amount of soil that is excavated and the rate at which this happens. As such, reviews exist on the volumes and rates of sediment removal by burrowing mammals in specific environments or for specific groups of species. Here a standardised comparison of mammal burrowing across a broad range of burrowing mammal species and environments is provided, focussing on both burrow volume and excavation rate. Through an ISI Web of Science-based literature search, articles presenting estimates of burrow volumes and/or excavation rate were identified. Relationships between species body size and burrow volume/excavation rate were explored and the influence of sociality and method of burrow volume estimation was assessed. The results show that, although bigger species construct 1 bigger burrows, it is the smaller species that remove more sediment per unit time at larger, site- level spatial scales. Burrow volume estimates are, however, independent of species sociality (solitary vs group-living) and method of burrow volume estimation (excavation-based vs mound- based).
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomal Evolution of the Genus Nannospalax (Palmer 1903) (Rodentia, Muridae) from Western Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2013) 37: 470-487 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1208-25 Chromosomal evolution of the genus Nannospalax (Palmer 1903) (Rodentia, Muridae) from western Turkey Ferhat MATUR*, Faruk ÇOLAK, Tuğçe CEYLAN, Murat SEVİNDİK, Mustafa SÖZEN Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey Received: 29.08.2012 Accepted: 17.02.2013 Published Online: 24.06.2013 Printed: 24.07.2013 Abstract: We used 33 blind mole rats belonging to 10 different chromosomal races from 10 localities in western Turkey. We applied G- and C-banding techniques to compare chromosomal races as well as clarifying relationships between them. We discussed cytogenetic similarities and differences between chromosomal races. We concluded that 2n = 60C is the ancestor of the other chromosomal races. However, as a result of ongoing evolution processes 2n = 38 and 2n = 60K have become ancestors to chromosomal races on their peripherals. We discovered which rearrangements contribute to the evolution of such a complex chromosomal race system in a genus. With this study we provide a comprehensive comparison of the 10 chromosomal races and perform a cladistic analysis using chromosomal rearrangement character states. According to our tree, chromosomal races with a low diploid number formed a monophyletic group. Key words: Blind mole rat, comparative cytogenetic, G- and C-banding, chromosome differentiation, phylogeny, Anatolia 1. Introduction assumed that ancestral karyotype diverged into the 2n The genus Nannospalax includes blind rodents that have = 60W and R chromosomal races, and independent adapted to living underground.
    [Show full text]
  • Kangaroo Rat and Pocket Mouse
    Shrew Family Order Rodentia (Soricoidae) masked shrew vagrant shrew water shrew Sorex cinereus Sorex vagrans Sorex palustris grassland streambank streambank Mouse, Vole, Rats, and Muskrat (Cricetidae) meadow vole long-tailed vole heather vole Microtus pennsylvanicu Microtus longicaudus Phenacomys intermedius grassland streambank streambank/grassland/mountain Gapper’s red-backed vole deer mouse Western harvest mouse Clethrionomys gapperi Peromycus maniculatus Reithrodontomys megalotis mountain mountain/streambank grassland bushy-tailed woodrat Neotoma cinerea mountain rock mouse Northern grasshopper mouse Peromyscus difficilis Onychomys leucogaster mountain grassland Jumping Mouse Kangaroo Rat and Family Pocket Mouse silky pocket mouse (Zapodidae) (Heteromyidae) Perognathus flavus desert Western jumping mouse Ord’s kangaroo rat Apache pocket mouse Zapus princeps Dipodomys ordii Perognathus apache streambank desert mountain 1:1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches 1 - Rodents Tracks are actual size. Pocket Gopher Porcupine Family Order Rodentia Family (Erethizonidae) (Geomyidae) Beaver Family (Castoridae) porcupine Erethizon dorsatum mountains/grasslands scale 1:3 beaver Castor canadensis streams/lakes/wetlands Northern pocket gopher scale 1:3 Thomomys talpoides grasslands scale 1:1 1:3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches Squirrel Family (Sciuridae) least chipmunk Colorado chipmunk chicaree Eutamias minimus Eutamias quadrivittatus Tamiasciurus douglassi mountain/grassland mountain forest Abert’s squirrel Sciurus aberti kaibabensis mountain/forest rock ground squirrel golden-mantled ground Spermophilus variegatus squirrel mountain Spermophilus lateralis streambank yellow-bellied marmot Gunnison’s prairie dog thirteen-lined ground squirrel Marmota flaviventris Cynomys gunnisoni Spermophilus tridecemlineatus mountain/rockslide grassland grassland 1:1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inches 2 - Rodents Rodentia tracks vary in size. Sciuridae tracks are actual size.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Antiquity of Rhizomys and Independent Acquisition of Fossorial Traits in Subterranean Muroids
    Chapter 4 The Antiquity of Rhizomys and Independent Acquisition of Fossorial Traits in Subterranean Muroids LAWRENCE J. FLYNN1 ABSTRACT In parallel with the growing body of molecular data bearing on the relationships of muroids, particularly subterranean lineages, the relevant fossil record has improved to the point that its data constrain scenarios of evolution about both the timing and mode of evolution of burrowing muroids, especially bamboo rats, blind mole rats, and zokors. Morphologists have considered these groups phylogenetically distinct from each other, but the three lineages appear to be related as a monophyletic Family Spalacidae, sister taxon to all other living muroids, based on both nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Although living genera are fully subterranean, the fossil record shows that the three groups evolved burrowing characteristics independently. Bamboo rats (Rhizomyinae) have the longest fossil record, extending into the Late Oligocene, but do not show fossorial traits until the Late Miocene. Blind mole rats (Spalacinae) have a fossil record nearly that long, and its early members also lack burrowing traits. Zokors (Myospalacinae) show characteristics considered derived relative to other groups, and have a shorter fossil record. The fossil record of the Tribe Rhizomyini, living Asian bamboo rats, extends to about 10 million years ago, with early species distinct at the generic level from living Rhizomys. The oldest well- known species assignable to an extant genus is Rhizomys (Brachyrhizomys) shansius from the early Pliocene of Yushe Basin, China, north of the geographic range of modern Rhizomys.A hypothesis of close relationship of bamboo rats, blind mole rats, and zokors leads to a reevaluation of affinities of certain Asian fossil taxa and reevaluation of polarity of some features, but molecular data are not yet robust enough to clarify interrelationships of the groups.
    [Show full text]