DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Nevada Reno (Jreeology of Paleozoic Basinal Rocks in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Nevada Reno (Jreeology of Paleozoic Basinal Rocks in The i \ University of Nevada Reno (jreeology of Paleozoic Basinal Rocks in the Northern Fox Range; Washoe County, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology. by Mark F. Thiesse V i August 1988 11 MINES LIBRARY The thesis of Mark F. Thiesse is approved: 2H03 Thesis Advisor Department Chairman Dean, Graduate School University of Nevada Reno August 1988 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. R .A. Schweickert for his help, encouragement and patience throughout this project. Dr. Bruce Wardlaw provided the conodont identification which suggested the Carboniferous (?) age of the metamorphic rocks. Other thanks go to Andy Markos and Bob Strobel for help with the thin sections and interesting discussions. And finally, thanks to Carol for typing and for funding this project. iv ABSTRACT The Fox Range in Northwestern Nevada is a typical Basin and Range fault block mountain range which has been tilted about 30° to the east, accelerating the erosion of Tertiary volcanic rocks along the steep western flanks, and exposing Paleozoic metamorphic rocks. The Paleozoic rocks consist of a very fine grained, siliceous mudstone which was regionally metamorphosed from mid-greenschist to mid-amphibolite facies producing argillite, schist, limestone, quartzite, and gneiss. These Paleozoic rocks exhibit three generations of structures. Di created the schistose and gneissic layering common throughout the range, along with abundant tight to isoclinal folds. D2 structures are dominated by two large, map-scale antiforms and occasional smaller, open to tight, east to northeast trending folds and assorted lineations. D3 structures are limited to a few north-south trending, open to gentle folds which affect all pre-Tertiary lithologies. These rocks were previously correlated with Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic mudstones common in northern Nevada. Lithologic, metamorphic, structural and fossil data suggest this correlation is not valid. Instead, these rocks are Carboniferous, and most probably are correlative with clastic rocks of the upper Paleozoic Golconda allochthon. V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ........................................ 1 Geographic Setting ................................ 5 Geologic Setting ................................... 9 Rock U n i t s ...........................................12 Structure ............................................ 39 Geologic History ................................... 74 Recommendations for Further W o r k ...................................... 85 References 87 1 INTRODUCTION The Fox Range of north central Washoe County contains some of the westernmost exposures of metamorphosed sedimentary rocks in Nevada. Several thousand feet (1000 m) of metasedimentary rocks are exposed in the range and are composed primarily of argillite, phyllite, schist, marble, quartzite and scarce gneiss. These metasedimentary rocks resemble pelitic rocks that are common throughout central and western Nevada, and are separated by an extensive tract of Tertiary volcanic rocks from the Klamath Mountains and northern Sierra Nevada. The pelitic rocks in central Nevada have been studied exten­ sively by numerous authors who have worked out the depositional and tectonic history in some detail. The rocks in far western Nevada, however, have been less extensively studied and those in the Fox Range have only been studied in reconnaissance by a few workers. Because of the lack of research and the potential significance of these pelitic rocks for understanding the regional tectonic framework, a study of the metamorphic rocks in the Fox Range was undertaken to provide information about the stratigraphy, structural history, and metamorphism. Scope of Investigation This project primarily involved detailed mapping and structural analysis of the metasedimentary rocks. Particular 2 attention was focused on style, orientation, and overprinting of folds and other structures. Thin sections were prepared of the metasedimentary rocks and the surrounding granitic and volcanic rocks to aid in lithologic indentification and to identify possible sources and depositional environments of the original sedimentary rocks. In addition, attempts were made to extract conodonts to date the metasedimentary rocks. Method of Investigation Approximately 30 square miles (78 km2 ) of the northern Fox Range were mapped at a scale of 1:24,000 during the Fall of 1983, and the orientation and style of cleavage, other foliations, lineations, and folds were noted in detail. Since the best exposures of the metasedimentary rocks are in deep narrow canyons along the range front, all of the canyons were walked and a majority of the ridges were also examined to map this area accurately. The areas with the best exposure and the greatest structural detail were re-examined in an attempt to measure sections and to determine specific generations of observed structures. The attitudes of folds were plotted on equal area stereonets to aid in the recognition of different generations of folding. Three base maps were used; only one, the Smith Canyon 7-1/2 minute quadrangle, was readily available. The other two maps, the Pyramid Lake 1 NE Nevada and the Peephole 3 SW Nevada sheets are older 7-1/2 minute T-maps which were used as preliminary maps to construct 15 minute series maps. These maps had to be specially ordered from the U.S.G.S. in Menlo Park, California. Air photos covering the area were obtained from the Eros Data Center in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and were used to trace large scale features and to assist in mapping lithologic contacts. Previous Investigations The first mention of this area was by Hague and Emmons in 1877 during the 40th Parallel Survey under the heading of the Lake Range. They provided a general description of the rock types and the physiography of the area north of Pyramid Lake, and suggested the metasedimentary rocks were Jurassic in age because of their similarity with other rocks to the east that overlie Jurassic limestones. The first mention of the Fox Range was by Hill (1915), who described the mining districts in the area. Overton (1947) also used the name Fox Range while describing the location of the Cottonwood mining district. Both of these authors briefly described the rock types and mineralogy present in the mining districts. Bonham (1969) discussed the Fox Range in general, together with structure, lithology, and mining history, and mapped the area at a scale of 1:250,000 in his report on Washoe and Storey Counties. He informally named the metasedimentary rocks the Nightingale sequence because they 4 resembled rocks in the Nightingale Range about 50 miles (81 km) southeast of the Fox Range. Bonham suggested that these rocks are probably correlative with the upper part of the Winnemucca Sequence of Silberling and Roberts (1962), and are uppermost Triassic and Lower Jurassic in age. Dixon (1977) studied the structural, stratigraphic, and economic relationships between the metasedimentary and volcanic rocks located in Wild Horse Canyon and the immediate vicinity, about 4 miles (6.5 km) south of the present study area. He agreed with Bonham’s (1969) correlation with the Winnemucca Sequence of Silberling and Roberts (1962). 5 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING Location and Accessibility The Fox Range is located in central Washoe county (Fig. 1) with its southern end about 7 miles (11 km) north of Pyramid Lake. The range is about 30 miles (48 km) in length and is up to ten miles (16 km) wide at its widest point. The range is oriented approximately North-South, being slightly convex to the west, and is bounded to the west by the Smoke Creek Desert and to the east by the smaller San Emidio Desert (Fig. 2), which is a southern arm of the Black Rock Desert to the northeast of Figure 2. The mapped area encompasses approximately 30 square miles (78 km2 )in the northern part of the range. The west side of the range is reached by traveling to Gerlach along State Highway 34, and then taking State Highway 81 about one mile northwest to the Gerlach landfill road. The landfill road intersects the Western Pacific Railroad tracks about 4.5 miles (7.25 km) to the south. The road that parallels the tracks skirts the northern tip of the range, curves around to the southwest and follows the western flank of the range. Access to the eastern portion of the mapped area is much easier. State Highway 34 is taken as far north as the Empire Hay Ranch road, a dirt road about 7 miles (11.3 km) south of Empire and 13 miles (21 km) south of Gerlach. This road intersects a powerline road after four miles (6.5 km). Following the powerline road west across the San Emidio 6 7 8 Desert, the eastern flank of the Fox Range is about 6 miles (10 km) farther. This entire range is criss-crossed by old .jeep trails and roads, so it is wise to use the previously mentioned topographic maps as a guide. Few of the dirt roads are maintained, so caution is advised when traveling the area. Physiography The Fox Range, typical of mountain blocks in the Basin and Range province, is a moderately rugged fault-block mountain surrounded by relatively low playas. The range is dissected by intermittent streams which carried water throughout 1983 because of the record amounts of precipitation during the winter of 1982-83. These small streams have cut deep narrow canyons that provide good exposures of the metamorphic rocks. Vertical cliffs over 200 feet (61 m) high were observed in many of the canyons, making it difficult to study these exposures thoroughly. The highest part of the range, the Pah Rum peak area, just south of the central part of the range, reaches a maximum height of 7600 feet (2320 m). The base of the range has an elevation of approximately 4000 feet (1220 m). The highest elevation in the study area is about 6800 feet (2043 m) and is located near the southern boundary. 9 GEOLOGIC SETTING Tertiary to Recent volcanic and minor sedimentary rocks, and Quaternary lacustrine and alluvial deposits are the predominant rock types in northwestern Nevada.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Source and Bedrock Distribution of Gold and Platinum-Group Metals in the Slate Creek Area, Northern.Chistochina Mining District, East-Central Alaska
    Source and Bedrock Distribution of Gold and Platinum-Group Metals in the Slate Creek Area, Northern.Chistochina Mining District, East-Central Alaska By: Jeffrey Y. Foley and Cathy A. Summers Open-file report 14-90******************************************1990 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary BUREAU OF MINES T S Arv. Director TN 23 .U44 90-14 c.3 UNITED STATES BUREAU OF MINES -~ ~ . 4,~~~~1 JAMES BOYD MEMORIAL LIBRARY CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Acknowledgments 2 Location, access, and land status 2 History and production 4 Previous work 8 Geology 8 Regional and structural geologic setting 8 Rock units 8 Dacite stocks, dikes, and sills 8 Limestone 9 Argillite and sandstone 9 Differentiated igneous rocks north of the Slate Creek Fault Zone 10 Granitic rocks 16 Tertiary conglomerate 16 Geochemistry and metallurgy 18 Mineralogy 36 Discussion 44 Recommendations 45 References 47 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Map of Slate Creek and surrounding area, in the northern Chistochina Mining District 3 2. Geologic map of the Slate Creek area, showing sample localities and cross section (in pocket) 3. North-dipping slaty argillite with lighter-colored sandstone intervals in lower Miller Gulch 10 4. North-dipping differentiated mafic and ultramafic sill capping ridge and overlying slaty argillite at upper Slate Creek 11 5. Dike swarm cutting Jurassic-Cretaceous turbidites in Miller Gulch 12 6 60-ft-wide diorite porphyry and syenodiorite porphyry dike at Miller Gulch 13 7. Map showing the locations of PGM-bearing mafic and ultramafic rocks and major faults in the east-central Alaska Range 14 8. Major oxides versus Thornton-Tuttle differentiation index 17 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Nimrod Area Granite County Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1958 Geology of the Nimrod area Granite County Montana Joel Kenneth Montgomery The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Montgomery, Joel Kenneth, "Geology of the Nimrod area Granite County Montana" (1958). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7095. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7095 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. aUv DATE DUE .**'“ '■’ K ^-r>o<> . t_A \J ^ D e c 0 1 ]ggg ^ A H 1 5 GEOLOGY OP THE NIMROD AREA GRANITE COUNTY, MONTANA by JOEL K. MONTGOMERY B. S. Brigham Young University, 1956 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1958 Approved by: Chairman, Board of ^aminers Dean, Graduate School 2 0 1953 bate UMl Number: EP37896 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT OisMftartion Publishing UMl EP37896 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Some Belt Rocks, Montana and Idaho
    Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Some Belt Rocks, Montana and Idaho By J. E. HARRISON and D. J. GRIMES CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1312-O A comparison of rocks from two widely separated areas in Belt terrane UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 75-607766 4- V For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Price 35 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract .................................................................................................................. Ol Introduction ............................:.................................... .......................................... 2 General geology ...............................................................;.'................................... 3 Methods of investigation ........................y .............................................................. 7 Sampling procedure ..............................:....................................................... 7 Analytical technique for mineralogy ...............:............................................ 11 Analytical technique and calculations for geochemistry................................ 13 Mineralogy of rock types........................................................................................ 29 Geochemistry .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning Man Geology Black Rock Desert.Pdf
    GEOLOGY OF THE BLACK ROCK DESERT By Cathy Busby Professor of Geology University of California Santa Barbara http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/busby BURNING MAN EARTH GUARDIANS PAVILION 2012 LEAVE NO TRACE Please come find me and Iʼll give you a personal tour of the posters! You are here! In one of the most amazing geologic wonderlands in the world! Fantastic rock exposure, spectacular geomorphic features, and a long history, including: 1. PreCambrian loss of our Australian neighbors by continental rifting, * 2. Paleozoic accretion of island volcanic chains like Japan (twice!), 3. Mesozoic compression and emplacement of a batholith, 4. Cenozoic stretching and volcanism, plus a mantle plume torching the base of the continent! Let’s start with what you can see on the playa and from the playa: the Neogene to Recent geology, which is the past ~23 million years (= Ma). Note: Recent = past 15,000 years http://www.terragalleria.com Then we’ll “build” the terrane you are standing on, beginning with a BILLION years ago, moving through the Paleozoic (old life, ~540-253 Ma), Mesozoic (age of dinosaurs, ~253-65 Ma)) and Cenozoic (age of mammals, ~65 -0 Ma). Neogene to Recent geology Black Rock Playa extends 100 miles, from Gerlach to the Jackson Mountains. The Black Rock Desert is divided into two arms by the Black Rock Range, and covers 1,000 square miles. Empire (south of Gerlach)has the U.S. Gypsum mine and drywall factory (brand name “Sheetrock”), and thereʼs an opal mine at base of Calico Mtns. Neogene to Recent geology BRP = The largest playa in North America “Playa” = a flat-bottomed depression, usually a dry lake bed 3,500ʼ asl in SW, 4,000ʼ asl in N Land speed record: 1997 - supersonic car, 766 MPH Runoff mainly from the Quinn River, which heads in Oregon ~150 miles north.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Evolution of the Northern Sierra Nevada
    TECTONIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN SIERRA NEVADA BATHOLITH A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Nicholas James Van Buer December 2011 © 2011 by Nicholas James Van Buer. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/xb187vq0064 Includes supplemental files: 1. Plate 1. Geologic Map of the Jayhawk Well 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (jayhawkwell.pdf) 2. Plate 2. Geologic Map of the Juniper Pass 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (Juniperpass.pdf) 3. Plate 3. Geologic Map of the Tohakum Peak NE 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (TohakumpkNE.pdf) 4. Plate 4. Geologic Map of the Tunnel Spring 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (tunnelspr.pdf) 5. Plate 5. Geologic Map of the Bob Spring 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (bobspring.pdf) 6. Plate 6. Geologic Map of the Tohakum Peak SE 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (TohakumpkSE.pdf) 7. Plate 7. Geologic Map of the Sage Hen Spring 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (SageHenSpr.pdf) 8. Plate 8. Geologic Map of the Bluewing Spring 7.5' Quadrangle, Pershing County, Nevada (BluewingSpr.pdf) ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Limestone Resources of Western Washington
    State of Washington DANIEL J. EVANS, Governor Department of Conservation H. MA URI CE AHLQUIST, Director DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 52 LIMESTONE RESOURCES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON By WILBERT R. DANNER With a section on the UME MOUNTAIN DEPOSIT By GERALD W. THORSEN STATII PRINTING PLANT, OLYMPI A, WASH, 1966 For sale by Department of Conservation, Olympia, Washington. Price, $4,50 FOREWORD Since the early days of Washington's statehood, limestone has been recognized as one of the important mineral resources _of the State. The second annual report of the Washington Geological Survey, published in 1903, gave details on the State's limestone deposits, and in later years five other reports published by the Survey and its successor agencies hove given additional information on this resource. Still other reports by Federal and private agencies hove been published in response to demands for data on limestone here. Although some of the earlier reports included analyses to show the purity of the rocks, very few of the samples for analysis were taken systemati­ cally in a way that would fairly represent the deposits sampled. Prior to 1900 limestone was produced for use as building stone here, and another important use was for the production of burned Ii me . Portland cement plants soon became leading consumers of Ii mestone, and they con­ tinue as such to the present time . Limestone is used in large quantities in the pulp industry in the Northwest, and in 1966 there was one commercial lime-burning plant in the State. Recognizing the potential for industrial development in Washington based on more intensive use of our mineral resources, and recognizing the need to up-dote the State's knowledge of raw material resources in order to channel those resources into the State's growing economy, the Industrial Row Materials Advisory Committee of the Deportment of Commerce and Economic Development in 1958 recommended that a comprehensive survey be made of the limestone resources of Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Dec 15, 1999 LAB MANUAL 1209
    October 2012 LAB MANUAL 1209.0 1209.0 LITHOLOGICAL SUMMARY 1209.1 GENERAL This test procedure is performed on aggregates to determine the per- centage of various rock types (especially the deleterious varieties) regulated in the Standard Specifications for Construction. 1209.2 APPARATUS A. Dilute Hydrochloric Acid (10% ±) - One part concentrated HCL with 9 parts water and eyedropper applicator B. "Brass Pencil" - (See Section 1218.2 for description) C. Balances - Shall conform to AASHTO M 231 (Classes G2 & G5). Readability & sensitivity 0.1 grams, accuracy 0.1 grams or 0.1%. Balances shall be appropriate for the specific use. D. Small Hammer, Steel Plate and Safety Glasses E. Paper Containers - Approximately 75mm (3") in diameter F. Magnifying Hand Lens (10 to 15 power) G. Unglazed Porcelain Tile (streak plate) 1209.3 TEST SAMPLE The test sample, prepared in accordance with Section 1201.4G, shall be washed (Observe washing restrictions in Section 1201.4G1c) and then dried to a constant weight at a temperature of 110 ± 5 °C (230 ± 9 °F). (See Section 1201, Table 1, for sample weights.) 1209.4 PROCEDURE Examine and classify each rock piece individually. Some rock types may need to be cracked open to identify or determine the identifying properties of the rock. (Always wear safety glasses). The following general guidelines are for informational purposes: • Always break open pieces of soft rock or any others of which you are unsure as the outside is often weathered. • Pick the easy particles first October 2012 LAB MANUAL 1209.4 • Don't be overly concerned about questionable particles unless they will fail the sample.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of NEVADA Brian Sandoval, Governor
    STATE OF NEVADA Brian Sandoval, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Big Game Staff Biologist Pat Jackson, Carnivore Staff Biologist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer Staff Biologist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Matt Jeffress Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Jeremy Lutz Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts Cover photo credit: Mike Cox This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2017-2018 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt County Elk Management Sub-Plan
    HUMBOLDT COUNTY ELK MANAGEMENT SUB-PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 BACKGROUND 3 PLAN GOAL 5 SCOPE OF THE PLAN 5 HUMBOLDT COUNTY PLAN PROCESS 6 POTENTIAL ELK CARRYING CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 7 STEERING COMMITTEE PROCESS 9 PLANNING UNIT SPECIFICS 10 UNITS 031 11 UNITS 032 13 UNITS 033 15 UNIT 034 17 UNIT 035 20 UNIT 051 22 MANAGEMENT ACTIONS 25 NDOW 25 BLM 27 USFS 27 USFWS 28 APPENDIX 30 1 INTRODUCTION Low densities of elk have been reported in many portions of Humboldt County with the bulk of the sightings occurring recently in unit 051. Based on observations that started as early as 1990 to 2014, it appears a small group of elk established a home range within the Santa Rosa Range. This small herd has continued to increase throughout the last two decades. In January of 2013, two cow elk were collared to track movement and use areas. Since the start of that project, to date, one collar has been recovered with data of known use areas. The second collar is due to fall off in August of 2015. In January 2014, the first elk survey flight was conducted. During this survey, a total of 21 elk were observed. All 21 animals were bulls with no cows being located. Prior to this survey, animals have been observed from the air on several occasions, incidentally during other specie surveys. Another follow-up survey was conducted in March 2015 to try to determine the number of elk existing in the Santa Rosa Range. During this flight no elk were observed.
    [Show full text]
  • California Terranes
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 338 1999 California terranes Eldridge M. Moores Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 Yildirim Dilek Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056 John Wakabayashi 1329 Sheridan Lane, Hayward, California 94544 ...subjected to the principle of least astonishment, geologic science has always tended to adopt the most sta- tic interpretation allowed by the data, and evidence indicating displacements larger than conceivable...has consis- tently met strong resistance. Seeber, 1983, p. 1528 A vital lesson of plate tectonics is that there is no validity to any assumption that the simplest and therefore most acceptable interpretation demands a proximal rather than a distant origin. Coombs, 1997, p. 763 INTRODUCTION been working in ophiolites for some six years, first on the Vouri- nos complex in northern Greece and subsequently on the Troodos Two of this volume’s coeditors persuaded the third into com- complex in Cyprus (Moores and Vine, 1971). At the Penrose con- menting on his own paper. There are three clear alternatives as a ference I reported on the evidence for sea-floor spreading in the “classic paper” on California terranes. In the first of these, Hamil- Troodos complex, although I had not yet made the connection to ton (1969) first mentioned the North American Cordillera as a col- all ophiolites. One of the informal breakout sections at the Pen- lage of exotic terranes and argued that the continental margin of rose conference was devoted to discussion of the problem of North America was built out from the shelf edge by material car- ophiolite emplacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Gold Belt. Geographic Relations
    DESCRIPTION OF THE GOLD BELT. GEOGRAPHIC RELATIONS. shore was apparently somewhat west of the Oro and the Mariposa slates, are found only on post-Juratrias upheaval, and that their age, present crest, and the sea extending westward the western flank of the Sierra Nevada. During therefore, is early Cretaceous. The principal gold belt of California includes received Paleozoic sediments which now consti­ the earlier part of the Juratrias period portions SUPERJACENT SERIES. a portion of the Sierra Nevada lying between the tute a large part of the central portion of the of the Great Basin were under water, as is shown parallels of 37° 30' and 40° north latitude. It is range. by the fossiliferous beds of that age in Eldorado CRETACEOUS PERIOD. bounded on the west by the Sacramento and San At the close of the Carboniferous the Paleozoic Canyon south of Virginia City and in the Hum- Since no beds of early Cretaceous age are Joaquin valleys, and on the east by a diagonal land area of western Nevada subsided, and dur­ boldt Mountains, but nowhere from the foothills known in the Sierra Nevada, it is presumed that line extending from about longitude 120° 40' in ing the larger part of the Juratrias period it was of the Sierra Nevada to the east base of the during the early Cretaceous all of the present the neighborhood of the fortieth parallel to lon­ at least partly covered by the sea. At the close Wasatch, if we except certain beds near Genesee range was above water. gitude 119° 40' in the neighborhood of parallel of the Juratrias the Sierra Nevada was upheaved Valley, are any deposits known which are of late During the late Cretaceous the range subsided 37° 30'.
    [Show full text]