DOCSLIB.ORG

Wind Warning Light Upgrade at San Luis Reservoir State Recreation Area EA 08-12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wind Warning Light Upgrade at San Luis Reservoir State Recreation Area EA 08-12 Draft Environmental Assessment Wind Warning Light Upgrade at San Luis Reservoir State Recreation Area EA 08-12 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region South Central California Area Office Fresno, California September 2008 Contents Page Section 1: Purpose and Need for Action............................................................... 1 1.1 Background............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................... 4 1.3 Scope... ………………………………………………………………… 4 1.4 Potential Issues........................................................................................ 4 Section 2: Proposed Action and Alternatives...................................................... 5 2.1 No Action Alternative............................................................................. 5 2.2 Proposed Action...................................................................................... 5 Section 3: Affected Environment........................................................................... 9 3.1 Biological Resources .............................................................................. 9 3.2 Cultural Resources.................................................................................. 11 3.3 Recreation............................................................................................... 12 3.4 Socio-Economic Resources .................................................................... 13 3.5 Indian Trust Assets ................................................................................. 14 3.6 Environmental Justice............................................................................. 15 Section 4: Regulatory Guidance………………………………………………… 15 4.1 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 USC 651 et seq.).................. 15 4.2 Endangered Species Act (16 USC1521 et seq.) ................................... 15 4.3 National Historic Preservation Act (15 USC 470 et seq.) ..................... 16 4.4 Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC Sec. 703 et seq.)............................ 16 4.5 Executive Order 11988 – Floodplain Management and Executive Order 11990-Protection of Wetlands ................................................................................................... 16 Section 5: List of Preparers................................................................................... 17 Section 6: References……………………………………………………………. 17 EA-08-12 i Draft Environmental Assessment Acronyms and Abbreviations APE Area of Potential Effect CDPR California Department of Parks and Recreation CDWR California Department of Water Resources CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database CTS California Tiger Salamander DBW Department of Boating and Waterways EA Environmental Assessment ESA Endangered Species Act ft foot or feet FWCA Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act GBEPA Gold and Bald Eagle Protection Act ITA Indian Trust Assets MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act National Register National Register of Historic Places NHPA National Historic Preservation Act Reclamation United States Bureau of Reclamation SJKF San Joaquin Kit Fox SLR San Luis Reservoir SLRSRA San Luis Reservoir State Recreation Area Sq ft square foot or feet SRA State Recreations Area USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service WWL wind warning lights EA-08-12 ii Draft Environmental Assessment Section 1: Purpose and Need for Action 1.1 Background San Luis Reservoir (SLR) covers approximately 27,000 acres of Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) owned land in Merced County, California between U.S. 101 and Interstate 5 approximately two hours south of San Francisco (Figure 1-1). The project area is owned by Reclamation and was built as part of the water storage and delivery system of reservoirs, aqueducts, power plants, and pumping stations operated under the California State Water Project and Central Valley Project. Construction on the SLR was completed in 1967; Reclamation was the constructing agency and the California Department of Water Resources the operating agency. In 1969, Reclamation transferred control of the operation and maintenance of the Reclamation recreation-related lands and facilities to the California Department of Parks and Recreation (CDPR). Reclamation and CDPR coordinate on the construction of new or replacement recreation facilities. • The mission of CDPR is to provide for the health, inspiration, and education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality recreation. CDPR has an agreement with Reclamation to manage Reclamation lands surrounding SLR and O’Neill Forebay for recreation purposes. CDPR also has the responsibility of maintaining the infrastructure needed for health and safety of the recreational enthusiasts. This includes providing boating safety features. The average number of visitors to SLR is documented at over 500,000 per year. Over the last 20 years the current wind warning lights (WWL) have provided a visual wind warning to boaters using SLR and O’Neill Forebay, collectively known as the San Luis Reservoir State Recreation Area (SLRSRA). The current lights have helped to save many lives; however, they are not visible from all locations and from the distance necessary to be viewed. EA-08-12 1 Draft Environmental Assessment Figure 1-1: Vicinity Map EA-08-12 2 Draft Environmental Assessment ·|}ÿ33 West of O'Neill Forebay, north of San Luis Creek campgrounds San Luis Creek [_ Day Use Area 5 Romero Visitors ¨¦§ Center area [_ [_ 152·|}ÿ [_ Medeiros area boat ramp [_ Basalt campground area Figure 1-2. Location of Existing and Proposed Sites for Wind Warning Lights. EA-08-12 3 Draft Environmental Assessment 1.2 Purpose and Need The need for the project is to improve the safety of boating at SLRSRA. SLR and O’Neill Forebay have been known for sudden and high winds, causing the water to become choppy and unmanageable for boaters. The Department of Boating and Waterways (DBW) is funding the project as it would enhance the safety of boating on the reservoir by upgrading with new lights that would provide greater visibility and warning ability to the boaters. This project would upgrade the current lights to Hali-Brite lights which would enhance visibility and forewarning to boaters over greater distances. 1.3 Scope This environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared to examine the impacts on environmental resources as a result of the retrofit of four existing WWL systems and the installation of one new WWL at SLRSRA. The areas that would be impacted would be the Basalt campground area, the San Luis Creek Day Use Area, Medeiros area boat ramp, Romero Visitors Center area, and the area west of O’Neill Forebay and south of the San Luis Creek campground (Figure 1-2). The Proposed Action, if implemented, would result in structures that would last until replacement is necessary which is expected to be 20 to 30 years. This EA will analyze the impacts of the Proposed Action in these areas throughout the SLRSRA and over the life of the project. 1.4 Potential Issues • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Recreation/Visitor Services • Indian Trust Assets • Environmental Justice • Socioeconomic Resources EA-08-12 4 Draft Environmental Assessment Section 2: Proposed Action and Alternatives 2.1 No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative WWL and kit fox den construction would not occur; the park would continue to operate with the existing WWL systems. Areas of SLRSRA would continue to be utilized by boaters with limited or no WWL visibility and warning. 2.2 Proposed Action Reclamation proposes to approve the retrofit of four existing WWL systems and the installation of one new WWL system at SLRSRA. Additionally, as part of the project, three kit fox dens with chambers would be installed. CDPR agrees to maintain these kit fox dens and to not apply pesticides at the wind warning sites. The WWLs would be located at SLR and O’Neill Forebay as proposed by CDPR and DBW. (See Figure 1-2.) At San Luis Reservoir the following is proposed: • Upgrade light at the Romero Visitor’s Center on the north side of the reservoir • Basalt area light would be remounted and new concrete pad installed At O’Neill Forebay the following is proposed: • A light near the San Luis Creek water treatment plant would be upgraded with a new tower and light and new supporting concrete pad • The Mederios area would be upgraded with a new tower and light and new concrete pad • A new WWL system, including concrete pad, tower and light would be added on the west side of the O’Neill Forebay north of the San Luis Creek north of the Group Camps Wind Warning Light Specifications and Construction: West side of the O’Neill Forebay, north of the Group Camps This site is located on the west side of the O’Neill Forebay approximately ½ mile south of the San Luis Creek campground. Currently, there is no light at this site. A WWL system would be constructed adjacent to a dirt access road to a large steel water tank located approximately 35 yards north of the light tower site. Power for this light would come from a high-voltage line running north/south approximately 250 feet west of the site. The hook-up to this power line would be approximately 500 feet northwest of the large water tank. The power line to the light tower would run southeast from the current
Load more

Recommended publications
  • San Luis Unit Project History
    San Luis Unit West San Joaquin Division Central Valley Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation Table of Contents The San Luis Unit .............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................4 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History .....................................................9 Post Construction History ................................................19 Settlement of the Project .................................................24 Uses of Project Water ...................................................25 1992 Crop Production Report/Westlands ....................................27 Conclusion............................................................28 Suggested Readings ...........................................................28 Index ......................................................................29 1 The West San Joaquin Division The San Luis Unit Approximately 300 miles, and 30 years, separate Shasta Dam in northern California from the San Luis Dam on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. The Central Valley Project, launched in the 1930s, ascended toward its zenith in the 1960s a few miles outside of the town of Los Banos. There, one of the world's largest dams rose across one of California's smallest creeks. The American mantra of "bigger is better" captured the spirit of the times when the San Luis Unit
    [Show full text]
  • RK Ranch 5732 +/- Acres Los Banos, CA Merced County
    FARMS | RANCHES | RECREATIONAL PROPERTIES | LAND | LUXURY ESTATES RK Ranch 5732 +/- acres Los Banos, CA Merced County 707 Merchant Street | Suite 100 | Vacaville, CA 95688 707-455-4444 Office | 707-455-0455 Fax | californiaoutdoorproperties.com CalBRE# 01838294 FARMS | RANCHES | RECREATIONAL PROPERTIES | LAND | LUXURY ESTATES Introduction This expansive 5732 acre ranch is ideal for hunting, fishing, your favorite recreational activities, a family compound, agriculture, or cattle grazing. Located in Merced County, just an hour and a half from the San Francisco Bay Area, infinite recreational opportunities await with elk, trophy black tail deer, pigs, quail, and doves. The angler will be busy with catfish, bluegill, and outstanding bass fish- ing from the stock ponds. The South Fork of the Los Banos Creek flows through the property. This property is currently leased for cattle, but the recreational uses are only limited by your imagination. Location The property is located in Merced County, 17 miles from the town of Los Banos, 26 miles from Merced, and 8 miles from the San Luis Reservior. With all the benefits of seclusion, and the conveniences of major metropolitan areas close by, this property is just a 1.5 hour drive to Silicon Valley. Air service is provided by Fresno-Yosemite International Airport, 78 miles from the property, or Norman Y. Mi- neta San Jose International Airport, 83 miles from the property. Los Banos Municipal Airport is lo- cated 17 miles away. The closest schools would be 17 miles away in Los Banos. From the north, take Highway 101 South to CA-152 East, right onto Basalt Road, left onto Gonzaga Road.
    [Show full text]
  • State Water Quality Certification of Hydroelectric Projects in California Andrew H
    McGeorge Law Review Volume 25 | Issue 3 Article 5 1-1-1994 Rock Creek Revisited: State Water Quality Certification of Hydroelectric Projects in California Andrew H. Sawyer California State Water Resources Control Board Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Andrew H. Sawyer, Rock Creek Revisited: State Water Quality Certification of Hydroelectric Projects in California, 25 Pac. L. J. 973 (1994). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/mlr/vol25/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Law Reviews at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rock Creek Revisited: State Water Quality Certification of Hydroelectric Projects in California Andrew H. Sawyer* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................... 974 II. WATER QUALITY/WATER QUANTITY INTERRELATIONSHIPS .... 975 A. Water Quality Impacts of Water Development Projects ... 975 B. Consolidation of Water Quality and Water Right Authority. 980 1. Water Quality Control ....................... 981 2. Water Rights ............................... 984 C. Rock Creek .................................. 986 III. CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 401 .................... 992 A. State Authority under the Clean Water Act ............ 993 B. Matters Within the Purview of Water Quality Certification . 996 1. Point Source vs. Nonpoint Source Impacts .......... 996 2. Applying Water Quality Standards: Water Chemistry vs. Beneficial Use Protection ................... 999 3. Other Appropriate Requirements of State Law ...... 1007 4. State Proceduresfor Certification .............. 1008 C. ProceduralLimitations ......................... 1010 1. Waiver ................................. 1010 2. Project Modifications ........................ 1013 3. Multiple Federal Permits ....................
    [Show full text]
  • The San Luis Reservoir, One of the Largest in California, Stores Water
    SAN LUIS RESERVOIR The San Luis Reservoir, one of the largest in California, stores water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and sends it by aqueduct to the Bay Area and Southern California. In midsummer, it held about 20 percent capacity. 74 / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MAGAZINE SEP 2014 RUN DRY AFTER THREE HISTORICALLY DRY YEARS, CALIFORNIA’S DROUGHT GROWS MORE CONFOUNDING AND THE FUTURE OF ITS WATER SUPPLY MORE UNCERTAIN. BY BILL MARKEN, HONORARY ASLA PHOTOGRAPHY BY PETER BENNETT/GREEN STOCK PHOTOS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MAGAZINE SEP 2014 / 75 O TALK ABOUT DROUGHT IN CALIFORNIA, YOU COULD START WITH THE MID-HOLOCENE PERIOD, WHEN A 1,400-YEAR DROUGHT LOWERED LAKE TAHOE 20 FEET AND LASTED LONG ENOUGH FOR CONIFERS TO GROW THREE FEET THICK ABOVE THE RECEDING WATERLINE before the lake eventually rose back up water. One spokesperson for a water At my neighborhood market in the over them. Or with the 1930s, when agency said, “We’re technically not in heart of Silicon Valley, Jim the butch- farm families escaped the Dust Bowl a drought”—that agency had enough er told me why the price of lamb has of Texas and Oklahoma and ran up water. Another agency said, “The dis- skyrocketed—rack of lamb, bones, T OPPOSITE against a California dry spell nearly as trict could run out of water by July.” fat, and all, sells for $29 a pound. devastating. Or start with 1976–1977, An operator of sled dog teams in the He said, “We usually get our lamb Water from Northern then the driest rainy season recorded, Sierra has gone out of business from from the Central Valley, where the California is sent south to Los Angeles by way when drastic water-saving measures a lack of snow, and a Modesto golf sheep graze on winter grass.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 137/Wednesday, July 17, 2002
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2002 / Notices 46999 the format of the box to allow census are also used by the Office of the identifying themselves as checkmark indications for the options of Inspector General, General Accounting representatives or officials of ‘‘dry cropped’’, ‘‘fallow’’, and ‘‘idle’’, in Office, and the Congressional Research organizations or businesses, available addition to the number of acres. Service to independently evaluate our for public disclosure in their entirety. • Within each subsection (i.e., program and to estimate the impacts of Dated: July 1, 2002. Cereals, Forage, Vegetables, etc.) in proposed legislation. These data are Elizabeth Cordova-Harrison, Section III on both forms, ‘‘Crop supplied to other Federal and State Production‘‘, we are placing the items in agencies to evaluate the program and Deputy Director, Office of Policy. alphabetical order. provide data for research. [FR Doc. 02–17944 Filed 7–16–02; 8:45 am] • In Section III on both forms, we are Description of Respondents: Irrigators BILLING CODE 4310–MN–M moving ‘‘Cantaloupe’’, ’’Watermelon’’, and water user entities in the 17 and ‘‘Honey Ball, Honeydew, etc.’’ from Western States who receive irrigation the ‘‘Vegetables’’ subsection to the water service from Bureau of DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Reclamation facilities. Also included are ‘‘Fruits’’ subsection. Bureau of Reclamation • In Section I on Form 7–332, entities who receive other water ‘‘Irrigator Information’’, we are services, such as municipal and San Luis Reservoir Low Point including a box that asks for the industrial water through Bureau of Improvement Project, California respondent’s telephone number so any Reclamation facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft San Luis Reservoir Expansion Appraisal Report
    San Luis Reservoir Expansion Draft Appraisal Report Central Valley Project, California Mid-Pacific Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation December 2013 Mid-Pacific Region - Planning Division U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation December 2013 Mid-Pacific Region - Planning Division Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Cover Image: Aerial view, looking west, of B.F. Sisk Dam and San Luis Reservoir. Image courtesy of DWR. San Luis Reservoir Expansion Draft Appraisal Report Central Valley Project, California Mid-Pacific Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region - Planning Division San Luis Reservoir Expansion - Appraisal Report December 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Purpose of the Appraisal Study ........................................................................................ 4 2.2 Need for the Appraisal Study ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project
    Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049121 State of California Department of Water Resources November 22, 2019 Initial Study of the Long-Term Operation of the State Water Project State Clearinghouse No. 2019049121 Lead Agency: California Department of Water Resources Contact: Dean Messer, Division of Environmental Services, Regulatory Compliance Branch 916/376-9844 Responsible Agency: California Department of Fish and Wildlife November 22, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Required Permits and Approvals ......................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Document Organization ....................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Summary of Findings........................................................................................................ 1-3 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cvp Overview
    Central Valley Project Overview Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation Table Of Contents The Central Valley Project ......................................................2 About the Author .............................................................15 Bibliography ................................................................16 Archival and Manuscript Collections .......................................16 Government Documents .................................................16 Books ................................................................17 Articles...............................................................17 Interviews.............................................................17 Dissertations...........................................................17 Other ................................................................17 Index ......................................................................18 1 The Central Valley Project Throughout his political life, Thomas Jefferson contended the United States was an agriculturally based society. Agriculture may be king, but compared to the queen, Mother Nature, it is a weak monarch. Nature consistently proves to mankind who really controls the realm. The Central Valley of California is a magnificent example of this. The Sacramento River watershed receives two-thirds to three-quarters of northern California's precipitation though it only has one-third to one-quarter of the land. The San Joaquin River watershed occupies two- thirds to three-quarter of northern California's land,
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Reservoir State Recreation Area Final Resource Management Plan / General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement
    2. Existing Conditions 2 Existing Conditions This chapter summarizes the existing land uses, resources, existing facilities, local and regional plans, socioeconomic setting, and visitor uses that will influence the management, operations, and visitor experiences at the Plan Area. This information will provide the baseline data for developing the goals and guidelines for the management policies of the Plan and will serve as the affected environment and environmental setting for the purpose of environmental review. 2.1 Land Use 2.1.1 Surrounding Land Uses / Regional Context The Plan Area is surrounded by a variety of land uses. Residential and commercial uses exist nearby in the unincorporated community of Santa Nella to the northeast of O’Neill Forebay. Lands to the southeast of the Plan Area between San Luis Reservoir and Los Banos Creek Reservoir include privately owned ranchlands, agricultural lands, an electrical substation, and scattered nonresidential uses. The San Joaquin Valley National Cemetery is northeast of O’Neill Forebay. Immediately west of San Luis Reservoir is Pacheco State Park, owned by CSP. DFW properties are located north of San Luis Reservoir and east of the O’Neill Forebay. The nearest incorporated cities are Los Banos, approximately 13 miles to the east; Gustine, approximately 18 miles to the north; and Gilroy, approximately 38 miles to the west. Santa Nella lies 2 miles to the northeast. Other nearby communities include Volta and Hollister. The Villages of Laguna San Luis, south of O’Neill Forebay and east of San Luis Reservoir, is an approved community plan that has not been constructed. Agua Fria is another planned community that could be developed south of and adjacent to the Villages of Laguna San Luis.
    [Show full text]
  • California Water Supply Infrastructure
    California Water Supply Infrastructure Natural: rivers, snowpack, aquifers Aqueducts, canals, pipelines, pumping plants Surface storage (dams, reservoirs) Groundwater extraction and recharge Urban: treatment, storm water capture, desalination California Aqueduct (DWR) Geographical Features Coastal Range Sacramento River Valley Delta San Joaquin River Valley San Francisco Tulare Basin area Kern County Colorado Los Angeles area River . http://www.california-map.org Imperial County 2 Water Accounting in California Average Usage Agriculture: 33 MAF Urban: 9 MAF Some sources of supply State Water Project: 3 MAF Federal Water Project: 8 MAF Colorado River: 5 MAF Ground water: 15 MAF Other from local projects and reuse 3 Water Supply Example: Irvine Ranch Water District 380,000 residents Water Sources for IRWD Local streams Recycling (non-potable) Imported by MWD Local groundwater pumping (OCWD) Remote groundwater banking Desalination (future) Role of Infrastructure in Water Transfers river or aqueduct Major California Water Projects Federal, State and local (California Water Plan: Update 2013) Shasta Dam and lake (Anthony Dunn) Red Bluff Diversion Dam (Red Bluff Daily News) Oroville Dam and lake (California DWR) Sacramento River (placesonline.com) Delta scene (DWR) Left: Sacramento – San Joaquin Delta (Wikipedia) Lower left: Harvey O. Banks Pumping Plant (baydeltalive.com) Lower right: Federal and State Aqueducts (Wikipedia) Friant Dam and Millerton lake (USBR) San Luis Reservoir (California DWR) San Joaquin River (www.alamy.com) Edmonston Pumping
    [Show full text]
  • I Integrated Water Operations in California: Hydropower, Overdraft
    Integrated Water Operations in California: Hydropower, Overdraft, and Climate Change By MUSTAFA SAHIN DOGAN B.S. (Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey) 2011 THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Civil and Environmental Engineering in the OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS Approved: _____________________________________ Jay R. Lund, Chair _____________________________________ Samuel Sandoval Solis _____________________________________ Jonathan Herman Committee in Charge 2015 i Abstract Several management and climate cases are evaluated with the updated CALVIN, a hydro-economic optimization model of California’s inter-tied water supply infrastructure. Updates to the CALVIN model include new projected 2050 agricultural target demands and scarcity penalties, improvements to network- flow representation, especially agricultural, urban, and wildlife refuge demands, and extended surface and ground water hydrology, now covering an 82-year historical inflow hydrology. A new energy price scheme is applied to CALVIN, which incorporates hourly energy price variations into monthly CALVIN operations. Using one constant average price for a month underestimates hydropower revenue and overestimates pumping costs. Hourly-varying moving average prices improved representation of hydropower revenue without creating significant scarcities to agricultural and urban water users. Effects of ending long-term groundwater overdraft in the Central Valley are evaluated with several management cases using CALVIN. The cases include effects of Delta outflow and Delta exports from a “no overdraft” policy. The least cost overdraft that minimizes groundwater pumping and scarcity costs is calculated for the 82- year period. Prohibiting Delta exports result in severe water scarcities south of the Delta. Water operations are more economical when overdraft is ended with adaptations, such as more Delta exports, increased groundwater banking, and water trades, than historical operations with overdraft.
    [Show full text]
  • This Report Is Preliminary and Has Not Been Edited Or Reviewed for Conformity with Geological Survey Standards
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF O'NEILL FOREBAY, WESTERN MERCED COUNTY, CALIFORNIA by DARRELL G. HERD Open-File Report 79-359 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Geological Survey standards. INTRODUCTION The east flank of the Diablo Range in north-central California is shown as an eastward-dipping monocline by Jennings (1977). The edge of the San Joaquin Valley, which closely parallels the strike of this monocline, is also coincident with the San Joaquin fault zone of Herd (1979). Late Pliocene- and Pleistocene- age_Tulare Formation gravels and late Pleistocene stream terraces locally end abruptly in a line of east-facing normal fault scarps alined with the escarpment at the valley edge. Near O'Neill Forebay in western Merced County, Tulare Formation gravels and the intercalated Corcoran Clay Member are offset and tilted eastward along east-dipping reverse faults in the San Joaquin fault zone. The faults nearly parallel bedding in the underlying Great Valley sequence. A groundwater barrier in late Pleistocene (and possibly Holocene) sediments along San Luis Creek is alined with the northern prolongation of one of the faults at O'Neill Forebay. REGIONAL GEOLOGY Previous Work The geology of the O'Neill Forebay area was first mapped by Anderson and Pack (1915) during a geologic reconnaissance of the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. Much later, the Great Valley sequence in the encompassing Pacheco Pass 15 f Quadrangle was explored and described by Schilling (1962). For the construction of O'Neill and San Luis Dams and the California Aqueduct, detailed geologic site investigations were conducted in the O'Neill Forebay area (Carpenter, 1965; Hall, 1965a, 1965b; U.S.
    [Show full text]