Ethnography and Poutics in F1rst-Century Rome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ethnography and Poutics in F1rst-Century Rome CHAPTER SEVEN VERGIL'S ITALY: ETHNOGRAPHY AND POUTICS IN F1RST-CENTURY ROME Clifford Ando At the end of the Roman Republic, in the aftermath of the Social War, all Italians were Romans, but not all Romans were Italians. To anyone but a Classicist, this .assertion would seem paradoxical, because precisely the opposite situation obtains today, when national states subsume individual polities just as loyalty toward the national state takes precedence over loyalty to the city of one's birth. This assertion may also reveal a profound conceptual problem within Roman thought, though the nature of the problem was quite different for Romans than for us. Like many others in the ancient world, the Romans regarded the city as the pre-eminent paradigm of the polit­ ical collectivity; it was, therefore, not obvious what sort of entity a united Italy would be. 1 Certainly neither Greek nor Latin had a term to designate such a vast community. Nor was it obvious what could unite the population of Italy: certainly not language, nor cus­ tom, at least not in the conditions that obtained at the start of the first century, nor even Roman citizenship, at least as it was tradi­ tionally conceived. The challenge that Romans and Italians faced, then, was to develop a conceptual framework for a united Italy that could surmount these obstacles. 2 In the late Republic and early empire individuals put forward different solutions to this problem, and this essay explores those advanced by Cicero, Augustus, and Vergil. If Romans did not locate the crux of this paradox where we do now, wherein lay the problem for them? To answer this question, we must begin with the terms Roman and Italian. Strictly speaking, only citizens of Rome were Roman. What is more, Romans tended 1 Ando (1999) considers Greek attempts to understand ·the political collectivity of the empire. 2 Cf. Fe1dherr (1997) 138-41. 124 CLIFFORD ANDO to associate citizenship with ancestral origo: your patria was generally the city whence your family sprang, and there you held citizenship. 3 The self-declared identity of Aulus Postumius Albinus succinctly con­ cretizes this understanding: nam sum homo Romanus, natus in Latio. 4 Romans also found it very difficult to conceive of citizenship as an honor, apart from the privileges and obligations that it entailed: one could earn a lower sort of citizenship that came with obligations and no privileges, but not the other way around. Romans consequently had no equivalent for Hellenistic icro1toA.ttEia.; political rights in some far-off polity were, through sheer impracticality, regarded and explic­ itly labeled as equivalent, as though not intended to be exercised. Thus, for example, those who regard hospitium publicum as a status that brought 'all the private rights and privileges of Roman citizen­ ship' without 'its burdens and obligations' seem, to me at least, to have misunderstood its import. 5 Hospitium publicum was explicitly not a form of citizenship and was, on the contrary, ideologically distinct from it.6 Consider, for example, Cicero's defense of Lucius Cornelius Balbus: it does not matter for us today, as it did not matter for Cicero, whether Balbus might, as a matter of law, hold citizenship in Gades and Rome simultaneously. 7 Before the jury Cicero empha­ sized not that Balbus had conformed to any existing statute, but rather that he had formally renounced his status as a Gaditanus once he moved his domicile to Rome: Cicero insisted that Balbus now dealt with his former countrymen through pacts of hospitium, pre­ cisely because hospitium did not imply shared patriotic sentiment. If 'Roman' was, at some level, a legal term with very circum­ scribed application but with complex ideological associations whose implications we must still untangle, 'Italy' and 'Italian' were, until the first century B.C., as fluid as Roman was precise.8 Italy had purely geographic significance: it was a peninsula that housed pop­ ulations diverse in origin, language, and customs. 9 Roman legislation 3 Thomas (1996) passim, but esp. 61-8, 97-102. C( Syme (1979-91) vol. 6, 106, 165-66, distinguishing between Hadrian's origo and birthplace. 4 HRR fr. I = Aulus Gellius 11.8.3. s E.g. Cornell (1995) 321. 6 So, rightly, Brunt ( 198 7) 515-16. 7 See Balb. 28-30, 42-3, and Caec. 100, and c( Brunt (1982), Rawson (1985a) 44-6, Errington (1988) 153. Contra, Sherwin-White (1973) 302-4. 8 Klingner ( 1965) 11-33. 9 The diversity of Italy in the second and first centuries B.C.: Tarpin (1998), Torelli (1995) 1-15, Crawford (1996), David (1996), Torelli (1999). .
Recommended publications
  • Thesis Draft 3.23.2014.Docx
    Cicero and Caesar: A Turbulent Amicitia by Adam L. Parison June, 2014 Director of Thesis/Dissertation: Dr. Frank E. Romer Major Department: History Though some study into the relationship between Cicero and Caesar has occurred, it is relatively little and the subject warrants more consideration. This is a significant gap in the historiography of late republican history. This thesis examines and attempts to define their relationship as a public amicitia. By looking at the letters of Cicero, his three Caesarian speeches, and his philosophical dialogue de Amicitia, I show that the amicitia between these two men was formed and maintained as a working relationship for their own political benefit, as each had something to gain from the other. Cicero’s extant letters encompass a little more than the last twenty years of Cicero’s life, when some of the most important events in Roman history were occurring. In this thesis, I examine selected letters from three collections, ad Quintum fratrem, ad Familiares, and ad Atticum for clues relating to Caesar’s amicitia with Cicero. These letters reveal the tumultuous path that the amicitia between Cicero and Caesar took over the years of the mid-50s until Caesar’s death, and , surprisingly, show Cicero’s inability to choose a side during the Civil War and feel confident in that choice. After Caesar’s victory at Pharsalus in 48, the letters reveal that Cicero hoped that Caesar could or would restore the republic, and that as time passed, he became less optimistic about Caesar and his government, but still maintained the public face of amicitia with Caesar.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar and the Pirates: Or How to Make (And Break) an Ancient Life’, Greece and Rome, 57(2), Pp
    Georgetown University Institutional Repository http://www.library.georgetown.edu/digitalgeorgetown The author made this article openly available online. Please tell us how this access affects you. Your story matters. OSGOOD, J. (2010) ‘Caesar and The Pirates: or How to Make (and Break) an Ancient Life’, Greece and Rome, 57(2), pp. 319–336. doi: 10.1017/S0017383510000057 Collection Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/10822/555438 © 2010 The Classical Association This material is made available online with the permission of the author, and in accordance with publisher policies. No further reproduction or distribution of this copy is permitted by electronic transmission or any other means. Greece & Rome, Vol. 57, No. 2, © The Classical Association, 2010. All rights reserved doi:10.1017/S0017383510000057 CAESAR AND THE PIRATES CAESAR AND THE PIRATES: OR HOW TO MAKE (AND BREAK) AN ANCIENT LIFE* Introduction It is hard for biographers, ancient and modern alike, to resist the story of the young Julius Caesar’s kidnapping by a band of pirates. Suetonius and Plutarch both include full versions of the tale, with specifi c details (Suet. Iul. 4; Plut. Vit. Caes. 1.4–2). Suetonius, for instance, writes that the kidnapping took place near the island of Pharmacusa (just off the coast of Asia Minor), while Plutarch, noting that too, also specifi es that the ransom that freed Caesar came from the (nearby) city of Miletus. And while Suetonius writes that Caesar, after his release, launched a fl eet, pursued the pirates, and punished them, Plutarch includes another phase in the story: having taken command of a fl eet and set sail (again, from Miletus), Plutarch’s Caesar captured nearly all the pirates but, instead of killing them right away, ‘he himself went to Iuncus, the governor of Asia, on the grounds that it belonged to him, as governor of the province, to punish the captives’.
    [Show full text]
  • Pompey and Cicero: an Alliance of Convenience
    POMPEY AND CICERO: AN ALLIANCE OF CONVENIENCE THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of Texas State University-San Marcos in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of ARTS by Charles E. Williams Jr., B.A. San Marcos, Texas May 2013 POMPEY AND CICERO: AN ALLIANCE OF CONVENIENCE Committee Members Approved: ______________________________ Pierre Cagniart, Chair ______________________________ Kenneth Margerison ______________________________ Elizabeth Makowski Approved: ______________________________ J. Michael Willoughby Dean of the Graduate College COPYRIGHT by Charles E. Williams Jr. 2013 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94- 553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgment. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Charles E. Williams Jr., authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Above all I would like to thank my parents, Chuck and Kay Williams, for their continuing support, assistance, and encouragement. Their desire to see me succeed in my academic career is perhaps equal to my own. Thanks go as well to Dr Pierre Cagnart, without whom this work would not have been possible. His expertise in Roman politics and knowledge concerning the ancient sources were invaluable. I would also like to thank Dr. Kenneth Margerison and Dr. Elizabeth Makowski for critiquing this work and many other papers I have written as an undergraduate and graduate student.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobility Under Augustus Spencer Williams
    The Nobility under Augustus Spencer Williams The Roman Republic began in 509 B.C. with the overthrow of the king Tarquinius Superbus by the Roman nobility. Enraged by the rape of Lucretia, the Roman nobility followed the example of Lucius Junius Brutus, ancestor of the Brutus who conspired against Caesar, who according to Livy swore “By this blood, most chaste until a prince wronged it, I swear, and I take you, gods, to witness, that I will pursue Lucius Tarquinius Superbus and his wicked wife and all his children, with sword, with fire, aye with whatsoever violence I may; and that I will suffer neither them nor any other to be king in Rome!” (Livy 1.59).1 With this violent expulsion of the last king of Rome, the nobility banded together and established a new system, the Republic. The powers of government had been divided into many public offices and elements, which Polybius describes in his sixth book. The new system endured external and internal hardships and crises, expanding for five centuries until it encompassed the Mediterranean. The aggressive leadership of the Roman Republic and the competitive nature of elections came from the passionate desire of the nobility to attain power and prestige. However, the competition that drove Roman politics was carefully maintained through the culture of the nobility, which focused on the military, public speaking, and elections. The crisis that gripped the Late Republic saw the rise of dominant individuals competing for control of Rome, with Augustus ultimately triumphing. Under Augustus, the system that had been established by the nobility of the Chrestomathy: Annual Review of Undergraduate Research, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Languages, Cultures, and World Affairs, College of Charleston Volume 9 (2010): 227-54 © 2010 by the College of Charleston, Charleston SC 29424, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystical Rome V 2.0- July Release Morra Universal Cinematic Game System Contents Chapter Eight: Genre: Mystical Rome
    Mystical Rome V 2.0- July Release Morra Universal Cinematic Game System Contents Chapter Eight: Genre: Mystical Rome ................................................................ 4 Mystical Rome Credits .................................................................................... 5 Target Audience ............................................................................................ 5 Rating and Descriptors: R ............................................................................... 5 Mystical Rome Inspiration ............................................................................... 6 Mystical Rome Budget .................................................................................... 7 Mystical Rome Archetypes ............................................................................... 7 Artisan .................................................................................................... 7 Barbarian ................................................................................................. 9 Bureaucrat ..............................................................................................10 Clergy ....................................................................................................11 Criminal ..................................................................................................12 Druid ......................................................................................................13 Gladiator .................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • “Roman”: Creating Identity in an Expanding World by Claudia I. Arno
    How Romans Became “Roman”: Creating Identity in an Expanding World by Claudia I. Arno A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Professor David S. Potter, Co-Chair Professor Nicola Terrenato, Co-Chair Professor Bruce W. Frier Professor Raymond H. Van Dam © Claudia I. Arno 2012 To my family and friends, whose support is invaluable. ii Acknowledgements I owe a great many individuals and institutions thanks for their support and assistance during the years I have been researching and writing this dissertation. I would first like to thank the University of Michigan Interdepartment Program in Greek and Roman History, which promotes the interdisciplinary study of Classics and History, and with which I am very proud to be associated. I am also grateful to the University of Michigan History and Classics Departments, whose cooperation makes IPGRH possible. I would especially like to thank my graduate colleagues in IPGRH, Classics, and History, who have made my graduate experience so enjoyable and rewarding. The staffs at the Univeristy of Michigan and UCLA libraries, as well as the UCLA History Department, and in particular Professor David Phillips, were critical in helping me obtain access to research materials while I was living in Michigan, Los Angeles, and Boston. I would also like to express my deep admiration for Dr. Susan Lipshutz, who I unfortunately never had the opportunity to meet, but whose devotion to the success of women in academia inspired the creation of an award fund from which I received valuable support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Cultural Memory of the Conquest of Latium
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 The Roman Cultural Memory of the Conquest of Latium Elizabeth Grace Palazzolo University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Palazzolo, Elizabeth Grace, "The Roman Cultural Memory of the Conquest of Latium" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1929. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1929 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1929 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Roman Cultural Memory of the Conquest of Latium Abstract In this dissertation, I examine the Roman cultural memory of the conquest of Latium and Rome’s earliest expansion through case studies of three Latin cities—Tusculum, Tibur, and Praeneste. Each of these cities underwent the transition from independent civic entity to community of Roman citizens on a different timeline than the majority of Latium: though most Latin cities came under Roman control after being defeated in the Roman-Latin Wars around 338 BCE, Tusculum had already been incorporated as the first municipium cum suffragio after 381 BCE, while Tibur and Praeneste seem to have remained independent allied cities until 90 BCE. I reconstruct the Roman cultural memory of these cities and how it changed over time, incorporating a variety of textual and material sources including literary references, inscriptions, iconography alluding to each city, and monuments or significant sites. I demonstrate that the memory of Tusculum, Tibur, and Praeneste as formerly independent, non-Roman communities persisted through the Late Republic and into the Empire, even as they became completely politically integrated with Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar's Women
    CAESAR’S WOMEN Mother Aurelia Cotta (c. 120-54 BC) Tacitus (Dialogus de oratoribus section xxviii) and Plutarch (Caesar’s Life) both portray her as respectable, renowned for brains and beauty. She and her brother, Gaius Cotta, both defended Caesar after he refused to divorce his wife, Cornelia Cinna. She gave evidence at the Bona Dea trial.1 Aunt Julia (c. 130-69 BC) Married Gaius Marius. Her devotion to him and to their son contributed to her reputation, which allowed her to keep her status even during Sulla’s persecutions of Marius and his allies. Caesar gave a funeral oration for her. Sisters Julia Major (c. 102-68) Married to Lucius Pinarius and to Quintus Pedius, one son from each union. Her grandsons (sons?) Lucius Pinarius and Quintus Pedius were named in Julius Caesar’s will along with Octavian. Either she or her sister testified, along with their mother, at the Bona Dea trial. Julia Minor (101-51 BC) Married Marcus Atius Balbus. Her second daughter, Atia Balba Caesonia, was the mother of Octavia Minor and Octavian, who delivered her funeral oration at ten years of age. Daughter Julia (c. 76-54 BC) Caesar broke off her first engagement so that she could marry Pompey. Despite the c. 30-year difference in their ages, the union was a happy one. In 55 BC she suffered a miscarriage after seeing blood on Pompey’s toga (not his own); she died in childbirth the following year. Due to the will of the people (and despite the attempted interference by the enemies of her father and husband), her ashes were placed in the Campus Martius.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the People and the Power Of
    An Introduction to the People and the Power of Beginning August 28, 2005 On Gaius Julius Caesar 100 B.C. – 44 B.C. Father: Gaius Julius Caesar Mother: Aurelia Family: Old patrician – traced its ancestry back to Aeneas and the goddess Venus. Followed the regular ladder to political success (the cursus honorum), achieving the consulship in 59. One of the populares—Willing to bypass the Senate and take his proposals directly to the popular assemblies. 58-49—Campaigned in Gaul, bringing this territory under the control of Rome. Early 49—Crossed the Rubicon (the river separating Italy from the Gallic provinces) with his army and began the civil war. (“The die has been cast.”) Gaius Julius Caesar (continued) 48—Defeated Pompey and the senatorial forces at Pharsalus, Greece. As he surveyed the dead on the battlefield, he is reported to have said: “They would have it so. I, Gaius Caesar, would have been condemned despite all my achievements, had I not appealed to my army for help.” February 44—Made Dictator for Life. March 15, 44(The Ides of March) —Assassinated at a meeting of the Senate in the theater built by Pompey. The conspirators were 60 senators, many of whom had fought against Caesar and had been pardoned by him. He received 23 stab wounds and fell dead at the foot of Pompey’s statue. A soothsayer had stopped Caesar on his way to the Senate meeting and warned, “Caesar, beware the Ides of March!” Undaunted, Caesar continued on his way and was killed. Gaius Julius Caesar (continued) BackgroundBackground Extraordinarily talented as a general, administrator, politician, orator, and writer.
    [Show full text]
  • Spreading and Controlling Information in the Roman
    Going Viral in Ancient Rome: Spreading and Controlling Information in the Roman Republic Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brendan James McCarthy, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee: Nathan S. Rosenstein, Advisor Greg Anderson Tina Sessa Copyright by Brendan McCarthy 2018 Abstract In recent years scholars have discussed the role of communication in the Roman political system. These studies have focused mostly on major public events like votes and contiones. This study will add to that discussion by looking at word-of-mouth communication. Rome’s political elite formed information networks to spread news and took great care that their public events like contiones and ludi were well attended and made news. Rome’s non-elite lived in a thriving city that encouraged the movement of people and information. Using theories taken from communications studies, sociology and the spatial turn of archeology, this study will examine the way information was spread after public events. The Roman elite relied on word-of-mouth to ensure that their reputations grew and their agendas received public support. They took great care to ensure that their public events would become news by encouraging favorable audiences to share accounts of the events with their peers. Sharing news, therefore, would have been an integral way from Romans to participate in politics. i Dedication Dedicated to my grandfather, Edwin McCarthy, who loved history and now is history ii Acknowledgements This project was a long time in the making and I am grateful for all the support I received throughout the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide Chapter 6
    !1 TEACHER’S GUIDE The theatre at Palmyra (Syria), showing the circular orchestra (front), tiered seating, raised stage, and the scaena (the building on the stage). Chapter 6 - At the theatre Content Chapter overview page 2 Language patterns page 15 Interactive image: the theatre page 3 Civilisation: Roman theatre page 16 Archaeology: the Herculaneum theatre page 5 Fact file: page 21 Marcus Nonius Balbus Story 1 (core): page 9 Mythology: page 23 A new statue Iphigenia Story 2 (consolidation): page 11 Overview of activities for Chapter 6 page 25 Data gets a scare Story 3 (consolidation): page 13 A play !2 TEACHER’S GUIDE CHAPTER OVERVIEW Interactive Image The theatre (based on the theatre at Pompeii). Archaeology The tunnels excavating the theatre at Herculaneum, and the theatre at Pompeii for comparison. Mystery object: papyrus scroll. Stories 1. A new statue: Balbus donates a statue to the theatre, but who does it depict? 2. Dama gets a scare: Dama goes for a walk at night, but gets a scare in the theatre. 3. A play: Balbus and Livia go to see a comedy, but Balbus struggles to find the best place to sit. Language development and sentence patterns Sentences with nominates, accusatives, multiple adjectives and multiple verbs: Balbus, parvus, cum magno servo in theatro stat. The small Balbus stands in the theatre with a big slave. Dama statuam magnam et fortem et formosam inspicit, et Balbum inspicit. Dama looks at the big, strong, beautiful statue, and looks at Balbus. Vocabulary for learning adest is there, is present spectat watches, is watching cum with statua statue fortis, fortem strong, brave theatrum theatre meus, mea my turba crowd ridet laughs, is laughing vir, virum man Civilisation The theatre: layout and function of the building, types of plays, the role of actors, the experience of spectators.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Civic Landscape of Augustan Rome: Aeneid 1.421-429 and the Building Program of Augustus Darryl Phillips Connecticut College, [email protected]
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Classics Faculty Publications Classics Department 2015 Reading the Civic Landscape of Augustan Rome: Aeneid 1.421-429 and the Building Program of Augustus Darryl Phillips Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/classfacpub Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Phillips, Darryl A. “Reading the Civic Landscape of Augustan Rome: Aeneid 1.421-429 and the Building Program of Augustus.” In A. Kemezis, ed., Urban Dreams and Realities in Antiquity. Remains and Representations of the Ancient City, Brill (2015) 229-245. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. 1 Phillips, Darryl A. “Reading the Civic Landscape of Augustan Rome: Aeneid 1.421-429 and the Building Program of Augustus.” In A. Kemezis, ed., Urban Dreams and Realities in Antiquity. Remains and Representations of the Ancient City, Brill (2015) 229-245. Reading the Civic Landscape of Augustan Rome: Aeneid 1.421-429 and the Building Program of Augustus Darryl A. Phillips, Connecticut College The Carthage of Aeneas In the first book of Virgil’s Aeneid, the Trojan hero Aeneas weathers storms at sea and beaches his ships on an unknown shore.
    [Show full text]