<<

More on Constructible and Angles Original Notes adopted from March 5, 2002 (Week 21)

© P. Rosenthal , MAT246Y1, University of Toronto, Department of Mathematics typed by A. Ku Ong

Lemma: If x0 is a root of a polynomial with coefficients in F(r), then x0 is a root of a polynomial with coefficients in F.

n n-1 Proof: Given (an + bn √r) x0 + (an-1 + bn-1 √r) x0 + ... +(a1 + b1 √r)x0 + a0 + b0 √r =0 with ai , bi ∈ F. n By Dividing through by an + bn √r, we can assume it is poly monic. (ie. coefficients of x0 is 1).

n n-1 x0 (an-1 + bn-1 √r) x0 + ... +(a1 + b1 √r)x0 + a0 + b0 √r =0 Then, n n-1 n-1 x0 + an-1 x0 +....+ a1x0 + a0 = √r (bn-1x0 + ... + b1x0 + b0 ) Square both Sides n n-1 2 n-1 2 (x0 + an-1 x0 +....+ a1x0 + a0 ) - r (bn-1x0 + ... + b1x0 + b0 ) =0

Recall: x0 algebraic if p(x0)= 0 some polynomial p with rational coefficients.

Theorem: Every constructible is algebraic.

Proof: Suppose x0 is constructible.

There exists Q = F0 ⊂ F1 ⊂ F2 ⊂...... ⊂ Fk with Fi = Fi-1 (√ri ) some ri ∈ Fi-1 , ri = 0, √ri ∉ Fi-1 such that x0 ∈ Fk

Fk = Fk-1 ( ¥ rk ) x0 = a + b ¥ rk, a, b ∈ Fk x0 root of x – ( a + b ¥U k ) = 0.

Lemma ⇒ x0 root of polynomial with coefficients in Fk-1 ⇒ x0 root of polynomial with coefficients in Fk-2 ∴ x0 root of polynomial with coefficients in Q.

Corollary: The set of constructible numbers is countable. Proof: It's contained in set of algebraic numbers which we proved countable.

Corollary: Angle θ can't be constructed with straightedge and compass if cosθ is transcendental

Eg. 370 We know that cos (37/3) is transcendental ⇒ (37/3) 0 is not constructible. Can you trisect 37 degrees if it is just given ( We presume you are given the angle , it is irrelevant if you can construct it or not)

Theorem: If cosθ is transcendental, then θ can't be trisected with straightedge and compass.

Proof: Can construct number cosθ from θ given:

Let F0 = {p(c)/q(c) , p, q polynomials with rational coefficients, q(c) ≠ 0} where c = cosθ.

F0 number . Before we started with Q. Here, we start with F0, which is the smallest field containing Q & c. Here, with straightedge and compass , we can make towers starting with F0 F0 ⊂ F0( ¥ r0 ) ⊂ (F0( ¥ r0 )) ( ¥ r0 ) cos3δ = 4cos3δ - 3cosδ. if 3δ = θ, δ = 1/3θ.

Show: cosδ is not in any such tower. If it were, cos3δ = c, so c = 4x3 – 3x would have a solution in a tower.

Preceding as before(if root of such a cubic in F(¥U LWVFRQMXJDWHLVD lso a root, go down until set root in F0. 3 ∴it suffices to prove: 4x – 3x – c =0 has no root in F0. Suppose x = p(c)/q(c) is a root with p, q polynomials with coefficients in Q.

4 (p(c)) 3 - 3p(c) - c =0 (q(c)) 3 q(c)

4 (p(c)) 3 - 3p(c) (q(c)) 2 - c(q(c)) 3 =0 Polynomial in c, rational coefficients = 0, contradicts c being transcendental unless the polynomial(after collecting coefficients) has all its coefficients 0; eg. 2(π3- π) + 2π - 2π3 = 0. But this can't happen: 1) if degree p > degree q, 4 (p(c)) 3 has only terms of highest degree 2) if degree p <= degree q. c(q(c)) 3 has only term of highest degree. ∴ Leading coefficients of the polynomial (after collecting terms) is not 0.

Corollary: Only countable numbers of angles can be trisected.

Showing we can Trisect ANY angle given we have a "marked" straightedge.

It is clear from the diagram that x is a third of θ. x + x + w = π w + y = π y = 2x 2x + 2x + z = π z = π - 4x x+ π - 4x + θ = π θ = 3x x = θ/3 x + z + θ = π

Polyhedron: solid, faces are polygons. A regular polyhedron() is a polyhedron all of whose faces are regular polygons with same number of sides as each other and all of whose vertices lie on the same number of faces.

1) 2)Tetrahedron ± 4 faces which are triangles 3) Dodecahedron ± 12 sided pentagon 4) Icosahedron ± 20 sides b) Octagon

All these have only 3,4,5 sides per face.

Theorem: There are only 5 regular polyhedron Proof: Let n be the number of sides of a face and k, the number of faces on which a vertex lies.

Note that k >= 3 For regular polynomial of n sides, angle is (n-2)π, so each angle is (n-2)π/n = π - 2π/n

k(π - 2π/2) < 2π n>=3(Polygons have at least 3 sides). ⇒ 1/n <= 1/3 so ±1/n>= 1/3

π - 2π/n >= π - 2π/3 = π/3 k(π - 2π/n) >= kπ/3.

∴ kπ/3 < 2π ∴ k<6 ∴k =3,4, or 5 k =3... 3(π - 2π/2) < 2π 3(n-2/n)π < 2π 2n ± 6 <2 n<6.

If k =3; n =3 tetrahedron k=3 & n =4 cube k =3, n=5 dodehedron.