APPENDIX D
EXISTING COASTAL ACCESS PARKING ANALYSIS AND SHARED PARKING STUDY
This appendix provides the technical data that informed the analysis of coastal access parking availability in Downtown Hermosa Beach, which is provided in Section 3.3, Recreation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Fehr & Peers prepared an existing conditions memorandum that described parking utilization in Downtown Hermosa Beach and at Selected Hotels. This data help informed and confirm the assumptions in the Shared Parking Study prepared by the Applicant’s parking consultants Walker Parking Consultants. The Shared Parking Study was also independently peer reviewed by Fehr & Peers, and underwent numerous rounds of revisions to clarify assumptions and substantiate impact conclusions that have been made in the EIR.
D1: Parking Utilization in Downtown Hermosa Beach and at Selected Hotels (Fehr & Peers 2017)
D2: Strand and Pier Project Shared Parking Analysis (Walker Parking Consultants 2017)
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 8, 2016
To: Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler
From: Miguel Nuñez and Cary Bearn, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Parking Utilization in Downtown Hermosa Beach and at Selected Hotels
LA16-2791.01
This memo provides a description of the current parking supply and utilization at on-street and off- street public parking locations in the vicinity of a proposed new hotel and mixed use commercial project (project) in downtown Hermosa Beach. The project site is located at the western terminus of Pier Avenue. This memo also includes an analysis of parking duration at a downtown public parking structure and parking utilization at three comparable beach hotel locations.
STUDY AREA
The data collection for this effort included on-street public parking within approximately three blocks of the project site and off-street public parking at three select lots (Lots A, B, and C). Data was also collected at nearby hotels anticipated to exhibit comparable parking characteristics comparable to the project. The public parking data collection locations, both on-street and off- street, are shown in Figure 1, which also shows the project site in the context of the surrounding streets.
PUBLIC PARKING
The existing setting study included an inventory and utilization survey of on-street and off-street public parking within approximately three blocks of the project.
This existing setting study focuses on identifying and quantifying existing peak demand, parking demand/supply relationships for the study area as a whole, and for on-street parking by street segment and off-street parking by lot/structure.
A parking duration survey was also conducted at one off-street public lot to identify the amount of time vehicles are parked at the largest public parking facility in downtown Hermosa Beach.
600 Wilshire Boulevard | Suite 1050 | Los Angeles, CA 90017 | (213) 261-3050 | Fax (310) 394-7663 www.fehrandpeers.com L t o th C M 16 m a a 7 n
( h D ter) 2 me 4 a hr r 3- - 2 ( d) t h ) | le 8 ter isab 9 t e d r a m ( 2 ( r | -h r) ( 4 e m 2 2 t 2 7 ( me 8 n r 4 h 4 - 3 e 3 ( ( | - - r) 3 t A ete h h e r m - -h r r v 4 h r (2 6 ) m m t r e S th | 15 m e e 2 t t e e ( e t r 3 r e ) ) - t r C h th ) 15 r s ce m 0 spa e aces eter) t 0 sp r m e (3-h r r) 3 H te 3 ) me ) | hr r - ( ete e (3 ) 3 -hr m term 3 4 t - 1 (2 hor r 9 (s m 5 h | 2 5 r) ( te r M e 3 ( m ) ( r er 3 -h et o 2 m (3 m 4 - 11 r - h 4 - h o (3 h s e | 8 ( r) r - e r et 3 a h t n
m 2 r m e h - - m r (24 t h r 5 ( A e m ) e t 1 r e S t t h 5 v r t m e 4 e e 1 e - t e r r m e e ) / y t t r i | e a ) n B r 2 x | ) ) i l ( ) t v th C | 1 14 5 d - P m C a ot i s n L ace l sp m al le ) ener vehic 245 g ctric ele ) | 3 D bled y n ) disa enc i r 0 erg r e 1 em m 1 - t t 8 e S 5 d 5 th x 13 ( 1 m ( 3 ( 3 m 2 r . - 3 -
y h h | r ( h - B 1 r o ) t r 3 t Lo r 5 m (
n s B ace m e p - t e al s 5 er m e e a v gen e T 36 t n ed t m y I bl i e a e h dis n g 2 r r y r c ) ) V n n t h i e C e erg h ) - m t k e 3 1 1 | 3 i r S ( | e a ) 5 r w P t 1 e _ r et a a ite m ) D e S n n t r i r jec -h m A o - r d Pr (3 5 y 9 1 d (
u 1 2 t
S ( _ Ave 2 1 r ie - h F P \ 6 r 1
D ( f 1
X 3 r
e (
M - 1
\ 3 h e - S ) ( r I h 3 | 2 m G r
\ - 1 , h s ( e 4 p
c 1 r i t e
5 e h m ( r - 1 p r m m a e ) - r h t | i i t G e t n r
\ C 4 , h r e t
g ) 2 1 ) p ( x n i 1 e | c k 5 r l r A m u a ot led - L ab m d P is d i 5 | e es t c i d e a l sp yc d al rc n e e ner oto r e m ) g ) 133 le | 4 x a ic veh c h ric ect l el u S 2
s e d r spac e 0 e
i 8 d
P
( g) 2 ) n 3 i 2 & rk
a p - hr ( d - (3 3 ( h 7 1 l n 2 - o r t a S ( h r h a t m l t 1 1 o r d
S e a m i _ n d t
1 e B e g i 0 r
. n t ) e e ) 1 g r | 9 a ) t ) 7 C ) c h ter 2 1t | me t \ 1 r S h 3-h h s ) 3 ( 10t 0 ter D e 0 3-hr m 7 3 (
2 r \ r) e mete v r i -h t -hr) 8 (24 c | 1 (3 A r) \ (24-h s 6 b d) o able J dis \ r) | 2 ( a -h t 7 (24 a d \ 3 0 a l p t f C \ h \ 10t
On-Street Parking Off-Street Parking Lot
Figure 1 Study Area & Parking Inventory Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 3
COMPARABLE HOTELS
Parking inventories and utilization surveys were conducted at three comparable beach hotel locations:
Beach House, 1300 The Strand, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Shade Hotel, Manhattan Beach, 1221 N. Valley Drive, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Shade Hotel, Redondo Beach, 655 N Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach, CA 90277
Hotel parking is defined as parking spaces available exclusively for hotel guests and does not include public parking locations. The hotels included in this study provided guests with valet parking and do not have self-park options. A more detailed description of the hotels amenities and the valet price structure are included in the section on Comparable Hotel Parking Occupancy.
PUBLIC PARKING INVENTORY
An inventory of the existing public parking supply at the study locations was conducted in late August 2016. The parking spaces were divided into on-street parking and off-street parking spaces. The number of marked on-street and off-street parking spaces in each lot was counted and any parking restrictions were noted.
ON-STREET PUBLIC PARKING
On-street public parking spaces were counted within the study area along Hermosa Avenue, Manhattan Avenue, 15th Street, 14th Street, Pier Avenue, 11th Street, and 10th Street, specifically along the following segments:
Hermosa Avenue (between 15th Street and 10th Street) Manhattan Avenue (between 14th Street and 10th Street) 15th Street (between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue) 14th Street (between Beach Drive and Manhattan Avenue) Pier Avenue (between Hermosa Avenue and Manhattan Avenue) 11th Street (between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue) 10th Street (between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue)
Table 1 summarizes the on-street parking supply that is shown on Figure 1. There are 287 on-street public parking spaces in the study area. The study area includes eight types of on-street parking: 24 hour metered, three hour metered, two hour, one hour, 15 minute, disabled parking spaces, taxi spaces, and loading zones. Parking utilization data was collected for all parking types. The parking utilization analysis focuses on metered and free parking open to the general public as these parking spaces may serve project patrons and represent the vast majority of available parking. TABLE 1 x ON-STREET PUBLIC PARKING INVENTORY x
1-Hour Without 24-Hour 3-Hour Permit Metered Metered 2-Hour Green Curb Loading ID Street Side Segment $1.25/hour $1.25/hour (no permit Disabled Taxi (Residentia (15 min) Zone ($30 for ($3.75 for parking) l and Daily 24 hrs.) 3 hrs.) Permits Exempt)
1 Hermosa Ave [2] East 15th St to 14th St 8 ------2 Hermosa Ave [2] West 15th St to 14th St 9 ------3 Hermosa Ave [3] East 15th St to 14th St 7 2 ------4 Hermosa Ave [3] West 15th St to 14th St - 8 ------5 Hermosa Ave East 14th St to 13th St - 9 - - 2 - - - 6 Hermosa Ave West 14th St to 13th St - 4 - - 2 - - - 7 Hermosa Ave East 13th St to Pier Ave - 8 ------8 Hermosa Ave West 13th St to Pier Ave - 5 - - 2 - - - 9 Hermosa Ave East Pier Ave to 11th St - 6 - - 4 - - - 10 Hermosa Ave West Pier Ave to 11th St - 3 - - 2 - 7 - 11 Hermosa Ave East 11th St to 10th St - 8 - - - - - 2 12 Hermosa Ave West 11th St to 10th St - 2 - - - - - 1 13 Manhattan Ave East 14th St to Pier Ave - 3 - - - - - 1 14 Manhattan Ave West 14th St to Pier Ave 5 5 [A] ------15 Manhattan Ave East Pier Ave to 10th St - - - 11 [B] - - - - 16 Manhattan Ave West Pier Ave to 10th St - - 3 14 - - - - 17 15th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 7 2 ------18 15th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 6 3 - - - 2 - - 19 14th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 1 11 - - 1 - - 1 20 14th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 5 8 ------21 14th St North Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr ------22 14th St South Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr - 3 ------23 14th St North Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave ------24 14th St South Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave - 3 ------25 Pier Ave North Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave (N) - 15 - - 3 - - - 26 Pier Ave South Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave (S) - 9 - - 1 - - - Manhattan Ave (S) to 27 Pier Ave South - 5 ------Manhattan Ave (N) 28 11th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave ------29 11th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave - 27 ------30 10th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 6 1 ------31 10th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 7 - - - - 2 - - 32 10th St North Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr - 3 ------33 10th St South Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave 8 ------34 10th St North Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave - 3 ------System-wide On-Street 69 156 3 25 17 4 7 5 Total 286 (270 General Parking [1]) Notes: [1] General parking includes metered and time restricted parking open to the general public and excludes 15-minute parking and parking reserved for disabled permits, taxis, or loading vehicles. [2] Northbound Hermosa Avenue, east of the median has parking on both the east and west side [3] Southbound Hermosa Avenue, west of the median has parking on both the east and west side [A] The five 3-hour metered spots are designated as a Taxi Zone Thursday - Monday 9 AM to 3 AM [B] The 1-hour parking sign does not indicate residential permits exempt Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 5
All metered parking within the study area is $1.25/hour. At that rate, 24 hours of metered parking costs $30 and three hours of metered parking costs $3.75. Silver post meters increase to $1.50/hour after 8:00 PM. All on-street metered and time restricted parking is enforced from 10:00 AM to midnight. Vehicles must be moved at the end of the time restrictions. Loading zones are enforced Monday through Saturday 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM.
The free one hour and two hour on-street parking is located along Manhattan Avenue between Pier Avenue and 10th Street. The one hour parking on the both sides of Manhattan Avenue south of Pier Avenue exempt vehicles with residential or daily permits. The two two hour parking spaces on Manhattan Avenue immediately south of Pier Avenue do not exempt permits.
OFF-STREET PUBLIC PARKING
Three public parking lots were included in the parking inventory. Two of these lots are surface lots and one is a parking structure. There were a total of a total of 441 public parking spaces (414 general spaces, five electric vehicle spaces, four motorcycle spaces, 17 disabled spaces, and one emergency vehicle/police space) available in the surveyed lots. As included in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 1 the off-street public parking lots are identified in this study as Lot A, Lot B, and Lot C. These public parking lots are described below:
Lot A is a surface public parking lot located north of 11th Street between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue. Lot A is located within one block of the edge of the project site. Lot B is a surface public parking lot located south of 13th Street between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue. Lot B is immediately adjacent to the project site. Lot C is a public parking structure located north of 13th Street between Beach Drive and Hermosa Avenue. Lot C is across the street from the project site. Parking duration was also collected at this public parking station.
Lot A and Lot C provide 24 hour metered off-street parking with a centralized pay station and with 24 hour enforcement. Both lots cost $1.25/hour until 8:00 PM and $1.50/hour from 8:00 PM to 2:00 AM. Monthly passes are available for $62/month with a 72 hour maximum. Hermosa Beach employee parking passes are available for $31/month and allow parking from 5:00 AM to 7:00 PM daily.
Lot B provides three hour metered parking with a centralized pay station and is enforced daily from 10:00 AM to midnight. Lot B meters cost $1.25/hour until 8:00 PM and $1.50/hour from 8:00 PM to midnight. Lot B is reserved every Wednesday from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM for farmer’s market vendor parking.
The physical parking structure that includes Lot C also includes the Beach House Hotel valet parking. The two parking areas are physically separated with separate driveway entrances. The public parking driveway is on 13th street west of Hermosa Avenue. The hotel valet parking entrance is on 14th Court east of Beach Drive. The parking inventory for Lot C does not include the hotel parking.
TABLE 2 OFF-STREET PUBLIC PARKING LOT INVENTORY
General Electric Emergency ID Location Motorcycle Disabled Notes Parking [1] Vehicle Vehicles
Centralized Pay Station, 24-hour metered parking; Public Lot monthly permits available (enforced 24-hours) Lot A Northwest corner of 133 2 4 5 0 11th St & Hermosa Ave 11 General spaces were reserved for a special event during the Saturday counts
Centralized Pay Station, 3-hour metered parking (enforced 10:00 AM - midnight) Public Lot 13th Street between Three general spaces physically blocked by trash bins Lot B 36 0 0 2 1 Beach Dr during the Saturday counts and Hermosa Ave Lotreserved for farmer's market vendor parking on Wednesdays 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Centralized Pay Station, 24-hour metered parking; Public Structure monthly permits available (enforced 24-hours) Lot C Northwest corner of 245 3 0 10 1 13th St & Hermosa Ave See Table 7 for Lot C parking duration Select Public Off-Street 414 5 4 17 1 Total 441 Notes: [1] General parking includes metered and time restricted parking open to the general public and excludes parking reserved for electric vehicles, motorcycles, disabled permits, or emergency vehicles. Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 7
PUBLIC PARKING UTILIZATION
The parking areas described in the preceding sections were surveyed on one weekday and one weekend day during the late-summer period to determine the number of vehicles parked at different times of each day surveyed. The surveys were conducted on Saturday, August 27, 2016 and Wednesday, August 31, 2016. This time frame was selected for analysis to capture the peak of the late summer season.
Each survey was conducted by noting the parking occupancy once an hour for each hour between 6:00 AM and midnight (total of 18 hours). The results of the analysis provide an indication of the number of occupied spaces. This information was used to assess the parking demand by time of day and determine the utilization percentage for both off- and on-street parking. The results show the locations and peak periods of usage throughout a typical weekend day and a typical week day.
The parking utilization surveys are summarized below. Appendix A contains the off-street parking utilization data sheets and Appendix B contains the on-street parking utilization data sheets. For the purpose of parking demand analyses, a parking facility is considered to have reached its effective supply if 90% of the spaces in the facility are utilized. Effective supply includes a cushion of extra spaces that allow for operating fluctuations, vehicle maneuvers, misparked vehicles, minor construction, etc. A parking system operates at optimum efficiency at slightly less than its actual capacity. It is unrealistic to expect an arriving parker to find the last available parking space in a system without significant frustration and the resulting perception that parking is inadequate. Because “perception is reality,” parking “demand” must include this effective supply cushion (Parking Structure – Planning, Design, Construction and Repair, 3rd ed. [Anthony P Chrest et al., 2001]). A 10% circulation contingency is widely accepted in the parking industry as an adequate cushion for mixed-use areas such as Downtown Hermosa Beach.
Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 8
ON-STREET PUBLIC PARKING
The results from the weekday on-street parking utilization surveys are summarized in Table 3. Typical morning, midday, and PM periods are shown in Figure 2 (8:00 AM), Figure 3 (12:00 PM), and Figure 4 (8:00 PM). The peak systemwide weekday on-street parking demand is 87% and occurs at 12:00 PM, 1:00 PM, 7:00 PM, and 8:00 PM. Several locations experienced utilization over 90% throughout the day, as can be seen in Table 3.
The results from the highest weekend on-street parking utilization surveys are summarized in Table 4 and shown on Figure 5 (AM), Figure 6 (Midday), and Figure 7 (PM). Weekend on-street parking demand is higher than weekday demand. The peak systemwide weekend parking demand is 98% and occurs from noon to 1:00 PM and from 6:00 to 8:00 PM. The systemwide weekend parking demand exceeded 90% from 11:00 AM to 10:00 PM.
OFF-STREET PUBLIC PARKING
The average weekday off-street public parking utilization is summarized in Table 5 and on Figure 2 (AM), Figure 3 (Midday), and Figure 4 (PM). The peak systemwide weekday off-street parking demand for all three public lots combined is 91% and occurs at 1:00 PM. Lot A parking demand is over 90% from 6:00 to 9:00 PM (ranges from 92% to 100% parking occupancy). Lot C’s parking demand is over 90% at 1:00 PM (92% parking occupancy). Lot B was used for Farmer’s Market vendor parking from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM on the day of the data collection. The Farmer’s Market occurs every Wednesday.
The average weekend off-street public parking utilization is summarized in Table 6 and on Figure 5 (AM), Figure 6 (Midday), and Figure 7 (PM). The peak systemwide weekend parking demand for all three public lots combined was 100% and occurred from noon to 1:00 PM. The overall weekend off-street parking demand was over 90% from 11:00 AM until 8:00 PM.
PARKING DURATION
A parking duration survey was conducted at the same time as the parking utilization survey for Lot C. During the hourly sweeps, the last four digits of each vehicle’s license plate were noted along with the vehicle’s location. Parking duration was calculated by tabulating the number of the same vehicles (as identified by the last four digits of vehicle license plates) present in the same parking space. If a parking spot was not used, the data shows an empty cell with no information. This data helped to develop a profile of the users in the study area, indicating a percentage of parkers staying a specific period of time and also allowed a determination to be made of the percentage of short- term, long-term, and all day parkers. TABLE 3 ON-STREET PUBLIC PARKING OCCUPANCY (WEEKDAY)
General ID Street Side Segment Parking [1] 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 9:00 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 8:00:00 PM [7] PM 8:00:00 8:00:00 AM [5] AM 8:00:00 12:00:00 PM [6] PM 12:00:00
1 Hermosa Ave [2] East 15th St to 14th St 8 75% 88% 38% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 88% 75% 100% 88% 88% 100% 63% 63% 63% 2 Hermosa Ave [2] West 15th St to 14th St 9 89% 100% 67% 89% 89% 78% 100% 100% 89% 78% 89% 89% 67% 67% 78% 67% 44% 44% 3 Hermosa Ave [3] East 15th St to 14th St 9 67% 78% 67% 56% 89% 89% 89% 100% 89% 89% 67% 100% 67% 67% 89% 78% 67% 56% 4 Hermosa Ave [3] West 15th St to 14th St 8 50% 50% 38% 63% 38% 50% 63% 100% 25% 13% 25% 63% 63% 100% 63% 50% 13% 0% 5 Hermosa Ave East 14th St to 13th St 11 82% 82% 82% 91% 82% 91% 100% 91% 73% 73% 100% 91% 82% 91% 100% 64% 18% 9% 6 Hermosa Ave West 14th St to 13th St 6 83% 100% 67% 100% 83% 50% 83% 100% 83% 33% 33% 67% 83% 67% 83% 17% 17% 0% 7 Hermosa Ave East 13th St to Pier Ave 8 100% 88% 88% 100% 100% 100% 88% 88% 88% 75% 100% 100% 100% 88% 88% 50% 75% 50% 8 Hermosa Ave West 13th St to Pier Ave 7 86% 43% 57% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 71% 86% 86% 86% 86% 86% 100% 43% 43% 43% 9 Hermosa Ave East Pier Ave to 11th St 10 20% 50% 60% 50% 40% 30% 80% 90% 50% 90% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 20% 10% 20% 10 Hermosa Ave West Pier Ave to 11th St 5 0% 40% 40% 60% 60% 60% 80% 100% 60% 40% 80% 60% 80% 100% 100% 20% 0% 20% 11 Hermosa Ave East 11th St to 10th St 10 50% 63% 88% 75% 63% 75% 63% 75% 100% 75% 63% 100% 63% 75% 75% 63% 75% 50% 12 Hermosa Ave West 11th St to 10th St 2 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 13 Manhattan Ave East 14th St to Pier Ave 3 33% 67% 100% 100% 100% 67% 67% 33% 67% 67% 67% 100% 0% 100% 100% 67% 33% 0% 14 Manhattan Ave [4] West 14th St to Pier Ave 10 30% 30% 50% 80% 100% 80% 80% 60% 70% 60% 60% 70% 100% 100% 90% 50% 40% 40% 15 Manhattan Ave East Pier Ave to 10th St 11 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 100% 91% 100% 100% 16 Manhattan Ave West Pier Ave to 10th St 17 71% 41% 35% 53% 59% 88% 82% 94% 100% 94% 88% 100% 100% 88% 100% 94% 94% 100% 17 15th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 9 67% 56% 56% 67% 78% 100% 78% 78% 78% 56% 89% 89% 89% 89% 78% 78% 89% 78% 18 15th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 9 67% 67% 89% 78% 89% 89% 67% 67% 56% 67% 78% 67% 67% 78% 67% 78% 67% 56% 19 14th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 13 21% 57% 57% 79% 64% 86% 93% 93% 100% 64% 64% 86% 57% 93% 64% 36% 21% 14% 20 14th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 13 23% 38% 23% 23% 62% 77% 100% 100% 100% 69% 85% 92% 92% 92% 85% 54% 46% 46% 21 14th St North Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr 0 22 14th St South Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr 3 33% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 33% 100% 100% 67% 100% 67% 100% 100% 67% 0% 23 14th St North Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave 0 24 14th St South Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave 3 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 25 Pier Ave North Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave (N) 18 44% 39% 72% 72% 50% 72% 67% 67% 56% 61% 72% 72% 83% 83% 67% 50% 56% 50% 26 Pier Ave South Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave (S) 10 20% 40% 40% 90% 80% 90% 80% 70% 80% 100% 60% 90% 70% 80% 70% 50% 60% 50% 27 Pier Ave South Manhattan Ave (S) to Manhattan Ave (N) 5 20% 40% 100% 60% 40% 100% 80% 100% 40% 40% 40% 60% 40% 40% 100% 0% 20% 20% 28 11th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 0 29 11th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 27 85% 78% 100% 100% 74% 93% 96% 81% 81% 74% 70% 89% 100% 96% 93% 81% 56% 67% 30 10th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 7 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 86% 100% 31 10th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 7 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 32 10th St North Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr 3 67% 33% 33% 33% 33% 0% 33% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 33% 100% 33 10th St South Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave 8 100% 88% 88% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 34 10th St North Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave 3 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% System-wide On-Street 272 62% 63% 68% 78% 75% 82% 87% 87% 80% 75% 77% 86% 84% 87% 87% 65% 56% 54% Notes: [1] General parking includes metered and time restricted parking open to the general public and excludes parking reserved for disabled permits, taxis, or loading vehicles. [2] Northbound Hermosa Avenue, east of the median has parking on both the east and west side [3] Southbound Hermosa Avenue, east of the median has parking on both the east and west side [4] Five metered spots are designated as part of a Taxi Zone Thursday - Monday 9 AM to 3 AM [5] AM Parking Demand used in Figure 2 [6] Midday Parking Demand used in Figure 3 [7] PM Parking Demand used in Figure 4 L th Ct o 16 m
a
D % r 56 6 3 7 8 % t 9% % 15th S 8
3
8 6
% 7 Ct % 15th
100% 100% 1 St 0 th M 4 0 % 1 57 % % o 23 n
t e 6 8 5 r 7 2 e 0 y % % %
B
l t v th C e 14 v d A
r ie 15% P
P d x h St a % m 3t l 0 . 1 m y 8 0 a 5 8 d 1 D k 7 % B e % r % e a T % 2 W 33 y
d h 7 n e V a t i m C S th e e 13 t w D r M g te a i H n S i ct D n e a k j o e r Pr d n r a r m h P 0%
M 4 a o A t _ s t 2 a a F
\ n
D A
X A v M
\ e v
S e I
G 6 \ s 4 0 c i %
h 0 p % a r G \ g t n C i 2th k 1 3 r
a 5 P
% d 14% e 1 r a 0 h 0 S
r t S % e th i 11 P B & e % d 00 1 8 a n 1 a c 8 r t 0 h % S
_ 0 D 1 % 0 . r 1
9 t 7 h C 2 t \ 11 s 0% 0
0 % 7 33 2 \ e v i % t 88 c St A % 0th \ 100 1 s b o J \ 0% a 0
t 1 a d \ 3 0 a l p t f C \ h \ 10t
Percent Utilized 76% - 90%
0% - 50% 91% - 100%+ 51% - 75%
Figure 2 Weekday 8:00 AM Parking Utilization L th Ct o 16 m
a
D
r % 1 78 8 0 9 0 t 7% % % 15th S 6
6 1
3 0
% 0 Ct % 15th
100% 100% St 6 14th 7 M % % 93 0% o 10 n t 1 8 e 8 r 0 0 3 e 0 % y % %
B
l t v th C e 14 v d A
r ie 84% P d P x
a m t . h S % t l
_ 3 1 m 0 y 8 1 a 8 8 d 0
k D % B e 0 % e r a % % 7
W T 92 y d h 6 n V
a e
t i m C S th e e 13 t w D r M g te a i H n S i ct D a k n je e r Pro n r a d r
P m % h d 0 i 8 a o M t _ s t 3 a a F
\ n
D A
X A v M
\ e v
S e I
G 8 \ s 8 0 c i %
h 0 p % a r G \ g t n C i 2th k 1 8 r
a 2 P
% d 77% e 1 r a 0 h 0 S
r % e i P B &
t e S % d 1th 6 9 6 a 1 n 1 a c 3 r t 0 h % S
_ 0 D 1 % 0 . r 1
9 t 7 h C 2 t \ 11 s 00%
0 1 0 % 7 33 2 \ e v i 0% t 10 c St A % 0th \ 100 1 s b o J \ 0% a 0
t 1 a d \ 3 0 a l p t f C \ h \ 10t
Percent Utilized 76% - 90%
0% - 50% 91% - 100%+ 51% - 75%
Figure 3 Weekday 12:00 PM Parking Utilization L th Ct o 16 m
a
D % r 78 8 1 9 0
% 0 t 7% % 15th S 6
6
3 7
% 8 Ct % 15th
100% 100% 1 St 0 th M 4 0 % 1 64 % % o 85 n
t 1 e 8 0 9 r 3 e 0 0 y % % %
B
l th Ct v 14 d
53%
P d x h St a % m 3t l 0 . 1 m
y 8 1 0 a 8 d 0 1 D k % B e 0 r % e a % T % 7 W 83 y
d h 6 n e V a t i m C S th e e 13 t w D r g e a it n S i ct D n e k oj r Pr d r a
P 0% M Ave 7 P ier _ P 4 F
\ 1 D 0 X
0 M \ % S I 1 G \ 1 0 s
c 1 i 0 0 h 0 0 % p 0 a % r % G \ g t n C i 2th k 1 M r H a
P a
e d 6% n 9 r e
r m h a a h o
S t
r s t
e a
i a n P B A
&
t A e S % v d 1th 3 9 7 a 1 v n e 1 a c 5 e r t 0 h % S
_ 0 D 1 % 0 . r 1
9 t 7 h C 2 t \ 11 s 00%
0 1
0 % 7 100 2 \ e v i 0% t 10 c
A % \ 100 St s 10th b o J \ % a 86 t a d \ 3 0 a l p t f C \ h \ 10t
Percent Utilized 76% - 90%
0% - 50% 91% - 100%+ 51% - 75%
Figure 4 Weekday 8:00 PM Parking Utilization TABLE 4 ON-STREET PUBLIC PARKING OCCUPANCY (WEEKEND)
General ID Street Side Segment Parking [1] 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 9:00 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 8:00:00 PM [7] PM 8:00:00 8:00:00 AM [5] AM 8:00:00 12:00:00 PM [6] PM 12:00:00
1 Hermosa Ave [2] East 15th St to 14th St 8 75% 83% 100% 92% 100% 92% 83% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 2 Hermosa Ave [2] West 15th St to 14th St 9 100% 88% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 88% 100% 100% 3 Hermosa Ave [3] East 15th St to 14th St 9 67% 67% 100% 100% 78% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 78% 4 Hermosa Ave [3] West 15th St to 14th St 8 25% 25% 63% 100% 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 113% 125% 5 Hermosa Ave East 14th St to 13th St 11 27% 55% 82% 82% 91% 82% 100% 82% 100% 100% 100% 91% 91% 100% 100% 91% 73% 73% 6 Hermosa Ave West 14th St to 13th St 6 17% 83% 67% 100% 67% 83% 83% 50% 83% 83% 83% 83% 83% 67% 83% 83% 17% 33% 7 Hermosa Ave East 13th St to Pier Ave 8 0% 88% 88% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 88% 88% 100% 8 Hermosa Ave West 13th St to Pier Ave 7 29% 86% 86% 86% 71% 100% 100% 100% 71% 86% 100% 71% 100% 114% 100% 86% 100% 57% 9 Hermosa Ave East Pier Ave to 11th St 10 20% 30% 70% 30% 50% 50% 80% 80% 80% 70% 80% 70% 70% 70% 80% 50% 50% 80% 10 Hermosa Ave West Pier Ave to 11th St 5 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0% 50% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 0% 0% 11 Hermosa Ave East 11th St to 10th St 10 20% 40% 70% 40% 60% 90% 90% 90% 90% 100% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 100% 80% 90% 12 Hermosa Ave West 11th St to 10th St 2 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 13 Manhattan Ave East 14th St to Pier Ave 3 75% 75% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 14 Manhattan Ave [4] West 14th St to Pier Ave 10 80% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 70% 80% 15 Manhattan Ave East Pier Ave to 10th St 11 100% 91% 82% 100% 100% 100% 127% 100% 100% 100% 91% 100% 109% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 16 Manhattan Ave West Pier Ave to 10th St 17 82% 88% 88% 94% 82% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 100% 100% 100% 88% 100% 88% 100% 17 15th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 9 100% 100% 111% 100% 100% 111% 111% 100% 100% 111% 111% 111% 100% 100% 100% 100% 89% 89% 18 15th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 9 67% 67% 78% 78% 56% 56% 78% 67% 67% 67% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 89% 89% 56% 19 14th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 13 75% 67% 100% 92% 92% 92% 92% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 100% 92% 92% 92% 83% 58% 20 14th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 13 50% 64% 93% 93% 86% 86% 93% 93% 93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 93% 93% 21 14th St North Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr 0 22 14th St South Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr 3 0% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 23 14th St North Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave 0 24 14th St South Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave 3 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 25 Pier Ave North Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave (N) 18 14% 29% 86% 93% 100% 86% 86% 100% 100% 93% 79% 86% 100% 100% 100% 86% 93% 93% 26 Pier Ave South Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave (S) 10 10% 30% 80% 90% 90% 90% 110% 100% 100% 110% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 80% 27 Pier Ave South Manhattan Ave (S) to Manhattan Ave (N) 5 0% 0% 20% 60% 100% 80% 100% 100% 80% 100% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 80% 28 11th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 0 29 11th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 27 89% 100% 96% 70% 93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 100% 100% 100% 93% 100% 30 10th St North Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 7 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 129% 114% 114% 114% 114% 114% 114% 114% 114% 114% 114% 31 10th St South Beach Dr to Hermosa Ave 7 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 32 10th St North Hermosa Ave to Palm Dr 3 33% 33% 0% 67% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 33% 100% 33 10th St South Hermosa Ave to Manhattan Ave 8 88% 88% 75% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 88% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 100% 34 10th St North Palm Dr to Manhattan Ave 3 67% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% System-wide On-Street 272 57% 69% 85% 86% 87% 91% 97% 96% 96% 98% 96% 97% 98% 98% 98% 92% 86% 88% Notes: [1] General parking includes metered and time restricted parking open to the general public and excludes parking reserved for disabled permits, taxis, or loading vehicles. [2] Northbound Hermosa Avenue, east of the median has parking on both the east and west side [3] Southbound Hermosa Avenue, east of the median has parking on both the east and west side [4] Five metered spots are designated as part of a Taxi Zone Thursday - Monday 9 AM to 3 AM [5] AM Parking Demand used in Figure 5 [6] Midday Parking Demand used in Figure 6 [7] PM Parking Demand used in Figure 7 L th Ct o 16 m
a
D
r 1% th St 1 11 15 1 0 0 0
0 % 78% %
1
0 6 0 3 Ct % 15th %
100% 1 St 0 th M % 14 0 0 % 10 % o 93 n
t e 6 8 1 r 7 2 0 e
y % % 0
% B
l t v th C e 14 v d A
r ie 18% P d x P m . t a 2 h S % t l
_ 3 1 m 0
d 8 n 2 8 8
e D k 6 % B e % r % e a T % 6 W 70 y
d h 8 n e V a t i m C S th e e 13 t w D r M g te a i H n S i ct D n e a k j o e r Pr d n r a r m h P 0%
M 8 a o A t _ s t 5 a a F
\ n
D A
X A v M
\ e v
S e I
G 7 \ s 0 c i 8 % h
p 2 a r % G \ g t n C i 2th k 1 8 r
a 8 P
% d 46% e r a h S r e i P B &
t e S % d 1th 6 9 7 a 1 n 1 a c 0 r t 0 h % S
_ 0 D 1 % 0 . r 1
9 t 7 h C 2 t \ 11 s 00%
0 1 0 7 2 \ e v i t % t th S 75 c 10
A % \ 100 s b o J \ 0% a 0
t 1 a d \ 3 0 a l p t f C \ h \ 10t
Percent Utilized 76% - 90%
0% - 50% 91% - 100%+ 51% - 75%
Figure 5 Weekend 8:00 AM Parking Utilization L th Ct o 16 m
a
D t r 1% th S 8 11 15 1 3 0 % 0 78% %
1
0 1
0 0
% th Ct 0 15 %
100% 100% 1 St 0 th M 4 0 % 1 92 % % o 93 n
t 1 e 8 1 0 r 3 0 e 0 y % 0 %
% B
l t v th C e 14 v d A
r % ie 100 P
P d x St a % m h t l . 0 13 1 m d 1 0
n 0 e 1 0 0 k D B e 0 % % e r a % % 6 W T 3 0 y
d 1 h 8 n V
a e
t i m C S th e e 13 t w D r g te a i H n S i ct D k n je e r Pro r a d r P m % d i 110 o M _ s 6 a F \ 1
D A 0 X v 0 M
\ e % S I
G 8 \ s 5 0
c 1 i %
h 0 2 p % 7 a r % G \ g t n C i 2th k 1 M r a
P a
d % 98 n e
r h a a h
S t r St t
e h t a i 11 n P B
& e % A d 00 1 9 a v n 1 a c 0 e r t 0 h % S
_ 0 D 1 % 0 . r 1
9 t 7 h C 2 t \ 11 s 00%
0 1 0 % 7 67 2 \ e v i 0% t 10 c St A % 0th \ 100 1 s b o J \ 0% a 0
t 1 a d \ 3 0 a l p t f C \ h \ 10t
Percent Utilized 76% - 90%
0% - 50% 91% - 100%+ 51% - 75%
Figure 6 Weekend 12:00 PM Parking Utilization L th Ct o 16 m
a
D
r 0% th St 1 10 15 1 0 0 0
0 % 100% %
1
0 1
0 0
% th Ct 0 15 %
100% 100% 1 St 0 th M 4 0 % 1 92 0% % o 10 n t 1 e 8 1 0 r 3 0 e 0 y % 0 %
% B
l t v th C e 14 v d A
r ie 94% P
P d x St a %
m h t l 0 . 13 1 m d 1 0 0 n
e 1 0 0 D k B
e % 0 % r e a % 0 T % W 94 0 y
d h
n 1 e V a t i m C S th e e 13 t w D r M g te a i H n S i ct D n e a k j o e r Pr d n r a r m h P 0% M 10 a o P t _ s t 7 a a F
\ n
D A
X A v M
\ e v
S e I
G 8 \ 1 s 0 c i 0 % h 0 p a % r G \ g t n C i 2th k 1 8 r
a 8 P
% d 93% e 1 r a 0 h 0 S
r t S % e th i 11 P B & e % d 00 1 9 a n 1 a c 0 r t 0 h % S
_ 0 D 1 % 0 . r 1
9 t 7 h C 2 t \ 11 s 00%
0 1
0 % 7 100 2 \ e v i 0% t 10 c St A % 0th \ 114 1 s b o J \ 0% a 0
t 1 a d \ 3 0 a l p t f C \ h \ 10t
Percent Utilized 76% - 90%
0% - 50% 91% - 100%+ 51% - 75%
Figure 7 Weekend 8:00 PM Parking Utilization TABLE 5 OFF-STREET PUBLIC PARKING OCCUPANCY (WEEKDAY)
General ID Location Parking [1] 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 9:00 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 8:00:00 PM [5] PM 8:00:00 8:00:00 AM [3] AM 8:00:00 12:00:00 PM [4] PM 12:00:00
Northwest corner of 11th St & Lot A 133 3% 8% 14% 37% 47% 58% 77% 89% 71% 79% 81% 89% 98% 100% 96% 92% 75% 67% Hermosa Ave
13th Street between Beach Dr and Lot B [2] 36 11% 44% 33% 25% 72% 86% 92% 92% 92% 89% 56% 19% 36% 83% 83% 75% 58% 42% Hermosa Ave
Northwest corner of 13th St & Lot C 245 4% 7% 15% 36% 62% 80% 84% 92% 88% 85% 84% 84% 73% 70% 53% 47% 31% 33% Hermosa Ave
System-wide Off-Street 414 4% 10% 16% 35% 58% 73% 83% 91% 83% 84% 81% 80% 78% 81% 70% 64% 48% 45% Notes: [1] General parking includes metered and time restricted parking open to the general public and excludes parking reserved for electric vehicles, motorcycles, disabled permits, or emergency vehicles. [2] Lot B - Farmers Market Vendors parking only Wednesday 9 AM to 6 PM (grey values in table occur during the farmers market) [3] AM Parking Demand used in Figure 2 [4] Midday Parking Demand used in Figure 3 [5] PM Parking Demand used in Figure 4 TABLE 6 OFF-STREET PUBLIC PARKING OCCUPANCY (WEEKEND)
General ID Location Parking [1] 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 9:00 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 8:00:00 PM [6] PM 8:00:00 8:00:00 AM [4] AM 8:00:00 12:00:00 PM [5] PM 12:00:00
Public Lot Lot A Northwest corner of 122 [2] 19% 19% 46% 59% 83% 96% 98% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 98% 93% 87% 85% 84% 11th St & Hermosa Ave
Public Lot 13th Street between Lot B 33 [3] 30% 27% 70% 85% 100% 100% 103% 100% 100% 85% 94% 100% 100% 103% 94% 82% 82% 73% Beach Dr and Hermosa Ave
Public Structure Lot C Northwest corner of 245 7% 11% 18% 74% 79% 94% 100% 100% 99% 98% 98% 95% 96% 93% 94% 76% 54% 48% 13th St & Hermosa Ave
System-wide Off-Street 400 12% 14% 31% 70% 82% 95% 100% 100% 99% 97% 98% 97% 97% 96% 94% 80% 66% 61% Notes: [1] General parking includes metered and time restricted parking open to the general public and excludes parking reserved for electric vehicles, motorcycles, disabled permits, or emergency vehicles. [2] 11 general spaces were reserved for special event during Saturday counts and were excluded from the analysis [3] Three general spaces were physically blocked by trash bins during Saturday counts and were excluded from the analysis [4] AM Parking Demand used in Figure 5 [5] Midday Parking Demand used in Figure 6 [6] PM Parking Demand used in Figure 7 ` Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 19
Lot C includes general parking spaces, three electric vehicle parking spaces, 10 disabled parking spaces, and one emergency vehicle parking space. The parking duration analysis was conducted on the general parking only. Parking duration for all space types is presented in Table 7. A total of 614 distinct vehicles parked in Lot C on the weekday surveyed and a total of 837 distinct vehicles parked in Lot C on the weekend day surveyed. This means that, in effect, each parking space turned over 2.5 times on the weekday and 3.4 times on the weekend day.
Weekday short-term parking (one hour or less) accounts for 15% of vehicles that park in Lot C. Longer-term parking (two to four hours) accounts for 49%, and all-day parking (five hours or more) accounts for the remaining 36%. These results are shown in Figure 8.
250 30%
200 24% 28%
150 15% 16% 15% 100 10%
7% 5% 6% 7% 50 4% 6% 5% 5% 5% NumberParked of Vehicles 3% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1% 0 1 hr 2 hrs 3 hrs 4 hrs 5 hrs 6 hrs 7 hrs 8 hrs 9 hrs 10 hrs > 10 hrs Parking Duration
Weekday Weekend
Figure 8 – Lot C Parking Duration Weekday and Weekend
Weekend short-term parking (one hour or less) accounts for only 4% of all vehicles that park in Lot C, longer-term parking (two to four hours) accounts for 67%, and all-day parking (five hours or more) accounts for the remaining 29% of vehicles. These results are shown in Figure 8.
Many fewer vehicles were parked for one hour or less on the weekend compared to the weekday (4% compared to 16%). The majority of weekday vehicles were parked for one to three hours (59% of weekday vehicles) while the majority of weekend vehicles were parked for two to three hours (54% of weekend vehicles). An additional 35% of weekend vehicles were parked for four to five hours, while only 13% of weekday vehicles were parked for four to five hours. The data suggest that visitors to Hermosa Beach parking near the pier on weekends are less likely to park for one hour and more likely to park for two to five hours compared to visitors on weekdays.
TABLE 7 PARKING DURATION AT LOT C (WEEKDAY AND WEEKEND)
Total Parking Parking Type 1 hr 2 hrs 3 hrs 4 hrs 5 hrs 6 hrs 7 hrs 8 hrs 9 hrs 10 hrs > 10 hrs Spaces
General Parking [1] 245 93 165 91 44 34 27 32 28 40 20 19
Electric Vehicles 3 4------
Weekday Disabled 10 5611---11--
Emergency Vehicles 1 11------
General Parking [1] 245 32 237 191 117 82 39 45 25 12 9 11
Electric Vehicles 3 211------
Weekend Disabled 10 4 11 9 5 2 1 - 1 - - -
Emergency Vehicles 1 ------
Notes: [1] General parking includes metered and time restricted parking open to the general public and excludes parking reserved for electric vehicles, motorcycles, disabled permits, or emergency vehicles. Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 21
COMPARABLE HOTEL PARKING OCCUPANCY
HOTEL INVENTORY
Parking occupancy surveys were conducted at the Beach House in Hermosa Beach, the Shade Hotel in Manhattan Beach, and the Shade Hotel in Redondo Beach. Each hotel has fewer than 100 rooms, is located within three blocks of the beach, and provides valet parking only. Each hotel has event spaces; no events occurred during the data collection days.
The Beach House is located directly along the beach at 1300 The Strand, Hermosa Beach. The occupancy surveys for the Beach House were conducted on Wednesday, August 31, 2016 and Saturday, August 27, 2016. The Beach House offers valet parking to hotel guests, guests of hotel guests, and event spaces users. There is no official self-park option at the hotel and the valet service is not open to the general public. Parking is guaranteed for hotel guests, and during times of high demand, the valet stacks cars as needed. Overnight valet parking includes in-and-out privileges and costs $25. The Beach House has 96 rooms and provides valet parking for guests with a total of 96 available parking spots, providing a parking supply of 1.00 spaces per room.
The Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach (1221 N. Valley Drive, Manhattan Beach) is located in downtown Manhattan Beach, approximately three blocks from the beach. The occupancy surveys for the Shade Hotel were conducted on Saturday, September 17, 2016 and Tuesday September 20, 2016. The Shade Hotel at Manhattan Beach includes an event space and Zinc Lounge Restaurant. The hotel offers valet to hotel guests, events pace users, Zinc Lounge guests, and the general public. There is no official self-park option at the hotel. Valet parking is guaranteed for hotel guests and, as necessary, the hotel will pay for additional public spaces on behalf of the hotel guests. Overnight valet parking includes in-and-out privileges and costs $25. Valet parking for the general public is $16 and $8 for Zinc Lounge guests with validation. The Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach has 38 rooms and has 29 available parking spots, providing a parking supply of 0.76 spaces per room.
The Shade Hotel Redondo Beach is located at 655 N Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach. The hotel is located at the marina, between the Strand and Hermosa Beach and the Redondo Beach Pier. The surrounding area includes several restaurants and hotels and is directly connected to both Hermosa Beach and Redondo Beach with high quality bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. The occupancy surveys for the Shade Hotel Redondo Beach were conducted on Tuesday, November 1, 2016 and Saturday November 5, 2016. Shade Hotel Redondo Beach provides valet parking for hotel guests, guests of hotel guests, restaurant guests, and event space users. For less than three hours, valet parking costs $10, or $6 with restaurant validation; valet parking over three hours, but not overnight, costs $15, or $10 with restaurant validation; overnight valet parking with in-and-out privileges costs $25. No self-parking is available. The Shade Hotel Redondo Beach has 54 rooms and 53 valet parking spaces, providing a parking supply of 0.98 spaces per room.
Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 22
Comparable occupancy rates were observed across all three hotels, as shown in Table 8. Both the Shade Hotel locations were counted after the summer season and both demonstrate higher weekend occupancy rates than the late summer rates collected for the Beach House. The Shade Hotel Redondo Beach, which opened October 7, 2016, exhibits the highest weekend occupancy rate. The weekday room occupancy for each of the three hotels ranged from 74% to 100% across the three locations and is generally comparable. Based on observed room occupancy, the late summer counts and maturity of the hotel did not correlate with higher room occupancy.
TABLE 8 HOTEL ROOM OCCUPANCY
Weekday Weekend Hotel Total Rooms Occupied Night Occupied Night Of Counts Of Counts # of rooms 85 87 Beach House 96 % of rooms 89% 91% Shade Hotel # of rooms 38 37 38 Manhattan Beach % of rooms 100% 97% Shade Hotel # of rooms 40 54 54 Redondo Beach % of rooms 74% 100%
HOTEL PARKING DEMAND
Parking demand was defined as the rate of occupied parking spaces per occupied room. Before 11:00 AM, the parking demand was calculated based on the number of occupied rooms during the previous night and after 11:00 AM, the parking demand was calculated based on the number of occupied rooms for that same night. The rate of occupied parking spaces per occupied room may exceed 1.0 if there are more vehicles parked than rooms occupied (even when parking spaces are available), for example if guests arrive with more than one vehicle.
Parking utilization surveys at each hotel included hourly parking occupancy counts from 6:00 AM to midnight. Hotel occupancy information was collected for the night before and the night of each count. Parking occupancy (percent of spaces occupied) and parking demand (rate of occupied spaces per occupied room) was calculated for each hotel and is shown in Table 9. The number of vehicles using the valet parking overnight was provided by hotel staff and is shown along with the occupancy data in Table 9 and Figure 9.
The highest weekday parking demand for the Beach House occurred at 7:00 AM (52% spaces occupied and 0.54 occupied spaces per occupied room), for the Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach occurred at 9:00 AM (72% spaces occupied and 0.64 occupied spaces per occupied room), and for Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 23 the Shade Hotel Redondo Beach occurred at 10:00 AM (23% spaces occupied and 1.19 occupied spaces per occupied room).
The Beach House had an average weekday daily parking demand of 0.41 spaces per occupied room, the Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach had an average weekday daily parking demand of 0.44 spaces per occupied room, and the Shade Hotel Redondo Beach had an average weekday daily parking demand of 0.54 spaces per occupied room.
Overall, parking demand on the weekends was higher than on the weekdays. The highest weekend parking occupancy and parking demand for the Beach House occurred at 11:00 PM (79% occupied and 0.87 occupied spaces per occupied room). The highest weekend parking occupancy and parking demand for the Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach occurred at 6:00 AM and 7:00 AM (83% occupied and 0.63 occupied parking spaces per occupied room). The highest weekend parking occupancy and parking demand for the Shade Hotel Redondo Beach occurred at 7:00 PM (67% spaces occupied and 1.02 occupied spaces per occupied room).
The average weekend daily parking demand for the Beach House was 0.74 occupied spaces per occupied room, for the Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach was 0.55 occupied spaces per occupied room, and for the Shade Hotel Redondo Beach was 0.62 spaces per occupied room.
The on-site parking supply at each hotel exceeded maximum observed demand. Figure 9 shows the weekday and weekend parking demand at Beach House and Shade Hotel. Overall, the weekday hotel parking demand per occupied room was lower than the weekend hotel parking demand per occupied room. The weekday parking demand rates per occupied room at the Shade Hotel Redondo Beach has large fluctuations before 11:00 AM. The weekend parking demand at the Shade Hotel Redondo beach shows an evening peak that coincides with dinner time and may reflect restaurant guests not staying at the hotel.
TABLE 9 HOTEL PARKING DEMAND (WEEKDAY AND WEEKEND)
Hotel 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 Parked the Parked Parked the Parked TotalRooms Occupied Rooms Occupied Rooms Occupied (Space per Room) per (Space Night of the Counts Night the of Night of the Counts Night the of Parking Supply Rate Rate Supply Parking Valet Parking Spaces Parking Valet Night before the Counts the Night before Night before the Counts the Night before Number of Overnight Vehicles Overnight of Number Number of Overnight Vehicles Overnight of Number
Parking Demand [3] 0.45 0.47 0.54 0.49 0.46 0.45 0.48 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.45 0.36 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.29 0.35 0.38 0.44 0.39
91 85 Parking Occupancy 41 43 49 45 42 41 41 36 36 35 38 31 27 27 28 25 30 32 37 33 Weekday
Beach House [1] Parking Occupancy % 43% 45% 52% 47% 44% 43% 43% 38% 38% 37% 40% 33% 28% 28% 29% 26% 32% 34% 39% 34% 1300 The Strand Hermosa 96 96 1.00 Beach Parking Demand [3] 0.83 0.78 0.78 0.79 0.72 0.71 0.62 0.63 0.66 0.72 0.69 0.74 0.75 0.77 0.72 0.76 0.83 0.84 0.87 0.89
76 87 Parking Occupancy 63 59 59 60 55 54 54 55 57 63 60 64 65 67 63 66 72 73 76 77 Weekend Parking Occupancy % 66% 61% 61% 63% 57% 56% 56% 57% 59% 66% 63% 67% 68% 70% 66% 69% 75% 76% 79% 80%
Parking Demand [3] 0.24 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.64 0.61 0.47 0.53 0.61 0.53 0.55 0.50 0.42 0.32 0.37 0.32 0.29 0.32 0.32 0.24
33 38 Parking Occupancy 8 13 13 13 21 20 18 20 23 20 21 19 16 12 14 12 11 12 12 9 Weekday Shade Hotel Parking Occupancy % 28% 45% 45% 45% 72% 69% 62% 69% 79% 69% 72% 66% 55% 41% 48% 41% 38% 41% 41% 31% Manhattan Beach [2] 29 38 0.76 1221 N Valley Dr Parking Demand [3] 0.53 0.63 0.63 0.61 0.50 0.39 0.38 0.46 0.59 0.49 0.57 0.62 0.59 0.57 0.49 0.57 0.59 0.59 0.57 0.41 Manhattan Beach
38 37 Parking Occupancy 20 24 24 23 19 15 14 17 22 18 21 23 22 21 18 21 22 22 21 15 Weekend Parking Occupancy % 69% 83% 83% 79% 66% 52% 48% 59% 76% 62% 72% 79% 76% 72% 62% 72% 76% 76% 72% 52%
Parking Demand [3] 0.56 1.06 0.81 0.69 0.94 1.19 0.48 0.38 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.48 0.40 0.48 0.43 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.40
16 40 Parking Occupancy 9 17 13 11 15 19 19 15 14 12 10 12 19 16 19 17 16 16 14 16 Weekday Shade Hotel Parking Occupancy % 17% 21% 16% 13% 18% 23% 23% 18% 17% 15% 12% 15% 23% 20% 23% 21% 20% 20% 17% 30% Redondo Beach 53 54 0.98 655 N Harbor Dr Parking Demand [3] 0.72 0.77 0.62 0.53 0.40 0.32 0.50 0.39 0.28 0.44 0.54 0.57 0.65 0.87 1.02 1.00 0.78 0.70 0.78 0.72 Redondo Beach
53 54 Parking Occupancy 38 41 33 28 21 17 27 21 15 24 29 31 35 47 55 54 42 38 42 39 Weekend Parking Occupancy % 72% 50% 40% 34% 26% 21% 33% 26% 18% 29% 35% 38% 43% 57% 67% 66% 51% 46% 51% 74%
Notes: Highlights Represent Highest Quartile of Demand per count period [1] Beach House Hotel inventory excludes 1 disabled space [2] Shade Hotel inventory excludes 2 compact spaces blocked by storage, 1 electric vehicles space, and 1 city vehicle space [3] Before 11:00 AM, parking demand is defined as occupied parking spaces per number of occupied rooms for the night before the counts After 11:00 AM, parking demand is defined as occupied parking spaces per number of occupied rooms for the same night as the counts Beach House Parking Demand
1.00 per 0.80
Room 0.60
Spaces 0.40 of
0.20 Occupied 0.00 Number
Weekday Demand per Occupied Room Weekend Demand per Occupied Room
Shade Hotel Manhatan Beach Parking Demand
1.20 per
1.00 0.80 Room
Spaces 0.60 of 0.40 0.20 Occupied 0.00 Number
Weekday Demand per Occupied Room Weekend Demand per Occupied Room
Shade Hotel Redondo Beach Parking Demand
1.20 per
1.00 0.80 Room
Spaces 0.60 of 0.40 0.20 Occupied 0.00 Number
Weekday Demand per Occupied Room Weekend Demand per Occupied Room
FIGURE 9 – HOTEL PARKING DEMAND (WEEKDAY AND WEEKEND) Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 27
SUMMARY
This study was undertaken to assess the existing parking demand within three blocks of the project site. Existing public parking demand in the study area is generally high. Throughout the study area, weekday public parking utilization occasionally exceeded 90% and weekend public parking utilization regularly exceeded 90%. Hotel parking utilization never reached 90%. The following summarizes the findings of the study:
Public Parking – Weekday o The overall public on-street parking utilization ranges from 54% to 87% with individual street segments exceeding 90% utilization at each hour of the day. o The overall public off-street parking utilization ranges from 4% to 91% and exceeds 90% utilization in Lot C at 1:00 PM and at Lot A from 6:00 to 9:00 PM. Public Parking – Weekend o The overall on-street parking utilization ranges from 57% to 98% and exceeds 90% utilization from 11:00 AM to 9:00 PM. o The overall off-street parking utilization ranges from 12% to 100% and exceeds 90% from 11:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Hotel Parking – Weekday o At the Beach House, weekday parking demand ranged from 0.29 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 8:00 PM to 0.54 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 7:00 AM. o At the Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach, weekday parking demand ranged from 0.29 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 9:00 PM to 0.64 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 9:00 AM. o At the Shade Hotel Redondo Beach, weekday parking demand ranged from 0.18 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 4:00 PM to 0.75 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 7:00 AM and 10:00 AM. Hotel Parking – Weekend o At the Beach House, weekend parking demand ranged from 0.62 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 11:00 AM to 0.87 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 11:00 PM. o At the Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach, weekday parking demand ranged from 0.38 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 11:00 AM to 0.63 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 6:00 and 7:00 AM. o At the Shade Hotel Redondo Beach, weekday parking demand ranged from 0.18 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 4:00 PM to 0.75 occupied parking spaces per occupied room at 7:00 AM and 10:00 AM.
The overall demand for public parking was higher on weekends compared to weekdays. On both weekdays and weekends and at both on-street and off-street locations, public parking generally demonstrated a mid-day peak and an evening peak. The evening peak reflects the end of on-street and Lot B metered parking enforcement at 8:00 PM.
Nick Meisinger and Daniel Gira, Amec Foster Wheeler December 8, 2016 Page 28
The surveyed hotel sites supplied parking in excess of the observed parking demand with a maximum observed parking occupancy of 83% occurring over the weekend at the Shade Manhattan Beach.
The typical hotel parking demand pattern is high demand in the morning and evening and low demand during the middle of the day. The weekend Beach House demonstrated this typical pattern. The Shade Hotel Redondo Beach also demonstrated this general pattern, with the exception of the weekday morning fluctuations and the weekend evening dinner peak (Figure 9). The Beach House weekday and the Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach demonstrated generally flat parking demand rates (Figure 9).
Anecdotally, the Shade Hotel management attributed the higher valet parking utilization on weekends compared to weekdays to the higher frequency of family guests with personal automobiles. Shade Hotel management also indicated that guests were utilizing the valet services at the Redondo Beach location at higher rates compared to the Manhattan Beach location due to a general lack of public parking within close proximity of the Redondo Beach location.
APPENDIX A OFF-STREET PARKING UTILIZATION DATA SHEETS
Appendix A1 Weekday Off-Street Parking Survey
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING OCCUPANCY STUDY HERMOSA PARKING OCCUPANCY STUDY
SEGMENT STREET DATE CURB TYPE RESTRICTIONS 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 1:00 PM 1:00 9:00 AM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 12:00 PM 12:00 12:00 AM 12:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 INVENTORY
Beach House Hotel Beach House Hotel 08/31/16 Normal 70 35 39 37 35 35 35 29 30 28 33 27 24 24 25 22 25 26 29 28 No parking Sunday & Wednesday 5am - 7am Beach House Hotel Beach House Hotel 08/31/16 Compact 26 8 10 8 7 6 6 7 6 7 5 4 3 3 3 3 5 6 8 7 No parking Sunday & Wednesday 5am - 7am Beach House Hotel Beach House Hotel 08/31/16 Handicap 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No parking Sunday & Wednesday 5am - 7am Lot A Lot A 08/31/16 Normal 130 4 11 18 49 62 75 101 115 93 103 106 116 128 130 125 119 98 87 74 No parking Sunday & Wednesday 5am - 7am Lot A Lot A 08/31/16 Compact 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 No parking Sunday & Wednesday 5am - 7am Lot A Lot A 08/31/16 Motorcycle 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 No parking Sunday & Wednesday 5am - 7am Lot A Lot A 08/31/16 Electric Vehicle 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No parking Sunday & Wednesday 5am - 7am Lot A Lot A 08/31/16 Handicap 5 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 1 1 No parking Sunday & Wednesday 5am - 7am Lot B Lot B 08/31/16 Normal 36 4 16 12 9 26 31 33 33 33 32 20 7 13 30 30 27 21 15 10 No parking 6am - 7am. Farmers Market Vendors parking only Wednesday 9am to 6pm. Tow-Away | 3 Hour Parking | 10 AM to Midnight 7 Days A Week Lot B Lot B 08/31/16 Handicap 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 No parking 6am - 7am. Farmers Market Vendors parking only Wednesday 9am to 6pm. Tow-Away | Reserved For Disabled Lot C Level 1 08/31/16 Normal 51 3 8 20 44 50 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 47 31 29 17 20 13 Lot C Level 1 08/31/16 Handicap 4 1113243221111111110 Lot C Level 1 08/31/16 Compact 1 0000111111111111111 Lot C Level 1 08/31/16 Emergency Vehicle 1 0011000001000000000 Lot C Level 2 08/31/16 Normal 63 4 6 14 37 63 63 62 61 63 61 63 62 51 58 55 55 38 51 58 Lot C Level 2 08/31/16 Compact 5 0013255444555445544 Lot C Level 2 08/31/16 Handicap 3 0002100210333333233 Lot C Level 3 08/31/16 Normal 123 2 2 1 4 35 74 86 107 95 91 86 84 70 61 38 25 16 6 5 Lot C Level 3 08/31/16 Electric Vehicle 3 0010000001000010100 Lot C Level 3 08/31/16 Handicap 3 0000000000000000000 Lot C Level 3 08/31/16 Compact 2 0000022221122111000
Appendix A2 Weekend Off-Street Parking Survey
WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
PKG LOT A ELECTRIC SUMMER SUMMER Space Type UNMARKED HANDICAPPED TOTAL VEHICLES CONCERT CONCERT Space Inventory 85 5 2 38 11 141 Centralized Pay Temporary No Temporary No Station - $1.25 per Parking - Sunday Parking - Saturday hour 2 AM to 8 PM 8/28 8/27 and Sunday Restrictions - $1.50 per hour 8 8/28 PM to 2 AM - Enforced 24/7
600-700 23 2 0 0 0 25 700-800 23 2 1 0 0 26 800-900 49 2 1 8 0 60 900-1000 63 2 2 10 0 77 1000-1100 77 5 2 25 0 109 1100-1200 85 5 1 33 0 124 1200-100 85 3 0 36 0 124 100-200 85 5 0 38 0 128 200-300 85 5 0 38 2 130 300-400 85 5 0 38 2 130 400-500 84 5 0 38 2 129 500-600 85 5 0 38 11 139 600-700 85 5 0 38 11 139 700-800 85 2 0 36 11 134 800-900 80 3 0 34 10 127 900-1000 76 3 0 31 10 120 1000-1100 78 2 0 26 9 115 1100-1200 78 3 0 25 7 113
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
PKG LOT B EMERGENCY Space Type UNMARKED HANDICAPPED UNMARKED TOTAL VEHICLES Space Inventory 33 2 3 1 39 Centralized Pay Occupied by a Illegally Parked Station - $1,25 per large trash bin hour 2 AM to 8 PM Restrictions - $1.50 per hour 8 PM to 2 AM - Enforced 24/7
600-700 9 1 0 1 1 12 700-800 9 1 0 0 0 10 800-900 23 2 0 0 0 25 900-1000 28 2 0 0 0 30 1000-1100 33 2 0 0 0 35 1100-1200 33 2 0 0 0 35 1200-100 33 2 0 1 1 37 100-200 33 2 0 0 0 35 200-300 33 2 0 0 0 35 300-400 28 1 0 0 0 29 400-500 31 2 0 0 0 33 500-600 33 1 0 0 0 34 600-700 33 1 0 0 0 34 700-800 33 1 0 1 1 36 800-900 31 2 0 0 0 33 900-1000 27 0 0 0 0 27 1000-1100 27 1 0 0 0 28 1100-1200 23 2 0 1 1 27
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
PKG LOT BEACH HOUSE HOTEL PARKING (IN STRUCTURE C) Space Type UNMARKED TOTAL Space Inventory 95 95 Valet Parking Only Restrictions
600-700 59 59 700-800 59 59 800-900 60 60 900-1000 55 55 1000-1100 54 54 1100-1200 54 54 1200-100 55 55 100-200 57 57 200-300 63 63 300-400 60 60 400-500 64 64 500-600 65 65 600-700 67 67 700-800 63 63 800-900 66 66 900-1000 72 72 1000-1100 73 73 1100-1200 76 76
Notes:
Appendix A3 Weekday Lot C Parking Duration Survey
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING LOT DURATION STUDY
Lot Space Type Level Space 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 Level 1 0 Emergency Vehicle 9199 9199 9199 Level 1 0 Handicap N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 Level 1 0 Handicap W487 W487 W487 30PU 30PU Level 1 0 Handicap X664 X664 Level 1 0 Handicap B336 M927 G046 Level 1 111 Normal J796 J796 J796 J796 J796 J796 J796 J796 J796 J796 Level 1 112 Normal A759 A759 A759 A759 A759 A759 A759 A759 A759 342T 342T 342T 342T 342T 342T 342T 342T 342T Level 1 113 Normal S072 S072 S072 S072 S072 S072 S072 S072 S072 S072 S072 T175 J405 Level 1 114 Normal V925 V925 V925 V925 V925 V925 V925 V925 V925 Z484 Z484 R925 R925 F991 F991 Level 1 115 Normal A311 A311 A311 A311 A311 A311 A311 9GKN 9GKN 9GKN G339 Y611 Y611 Level 1 116 Normal G586 G586 G586 G586 G586 G586 G586 G586 G586 G586 G586 D523 Z280 O521 O521 Level 1 117 Normal V971 X833 X833 X833 X833 X833 X833 X833 R813 R813 NGBE NGBE NGBE NGBE Level 1 118 Normal L229 L229 L229 L229 N421 N421 N421 N421 N421 N421 N421 N421 N421 N421 N421 N421 Level 1 119 Normal 3367 Z167 Z167 Z167 D577 F515 F515 F515 F515 F515 F515 A751 G035 E570 E570 Level 1 120 Normal C968 C968 C968 C968 2163 2163 7167 7167 7167 7167 L585 Level 1 121 Normal 2163 2163 2163 2163 2163 2163 2163 2163 2163 2163 2163 B959 B959 B959 U644 U644 Level 1 122 Normal 4343 D993 D993 D993 D993 D993 C968 C968 C968 C968 B711 K505 Level 1 123 Normal 7343 A857 A857 A857 A857 A857 A857 A857 A857 A857 K204 K204 K204 Level 1 124 Normal C166 C166 C166 C166 C166 C166 C166 C166 W094 W094 Level 1 125 Normal E018 E018 E018 E018 E018 E018 E018 E018 E018 E018 D526 D526 6360 Level 1 126 Normal A985 A985 A985 A985 A985 A985 A985 A985 A985 A985 A985 Level 1 127 Normal E177 E177 E177 E177 E177 E177 E177 E177 E177 E177 W311 W311 Level 1 128 Normal J209 J209 J209 J209 J209 J209 J209 J209 J209 M284 M284 M284 A529 A529 Level 1 129 Normal R468 R468 R468 R468 R468 R468 S189 6TEX 6TEX U355 U355 U355 Level 1 130 Normal DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## Level 1 131 Normal T930 T930 T930 T930 T930 T930 J859 DP## DP## H135 H135 Level 1 132 Normal B524 B524 R203 R203 F979 D993 D993 D993 D993 D993 D993 D993 D993 D993 D993 D993 Level 1 133 Normal B046 B046 B046 B046 B046 B046 B046 B046 B046 Level 1 134 Normal N643 N643 N643 N643 N643 N643 N643 N643 N643 U463 E672 E672 E672 Level 1 135 Normal NP## D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 C058 Level 1 136 Normal E062 B527 X215 X215 X215 X215 5431 D932 D932 D932 D932 D932 D932 D932 Level 1 137 Normal A423 A423 A423 A423 A423 A423 A423 A423 8311 H266 H266 H266 Level 1 138 Normal 3355 3355 3355 3355 3355 3355 3355 DP## DP## B499 B499 B499 R761 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING LOT DURATION STUDY
Lot Space Type Level Space 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 Level 1 139 Normal L597 L597 L597 L597 L597 L597 L597 L597 Level 1 336 Normal K877 K877 K877 K877 K877 K877 K877 U840 U840 U840 N529 N529 H020 H020 H020 H020 H020 Level 1 337 Normal K391 K391 K391 K391 K391 K391 K391 V797 V797 V797 X344 X344 Level 1 338 Compact W022 W022 D559 W654 W654 X508 X508 X508 X508 X508 X508 X508 X508 X508 X508 Level 1 339 Normal 2403 Z095 Z095 Z095 Z095 Z095 Z095 Z095 Z095 Z095 P862 P862 Level 1 340 Normal W733 W733 W733 H922 G283 G283 G283 G283 G283 P874 P874 DP## DP## Level 1 341 Normal Z646 Y935 Y935 Y935 Y935 Y935 Y935 Y935 Y935 Y935 K265 Level 1 342 Normal K688 U968 U968 U968 U968 U968 U968 U968 U968 U968 K662 8YCF Level 1 343 Normal R817 3724 3724 3724 3724 3724 3724 3724 F804 L654 T390 Level 1 344 Normal K476 K476 K476 K476 K476 K476 K476 K476 K476 K907 T474 T474 T474 Level 1 345 Normal T098 T098 T098 T098 T098 T098 T098 T098 T098 T098 T389 T389 T389 Level 1 346 Normal D819 D819 D819 D819 D819 D819 D819 D819 D819 D819 V986 K146 Level 1 347 Normal L977 L977 L977 L977 L977 L977 L977 L977 L977 J050 J050 J050 G833 G833 Level 1 348 Normal 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 35Z1 C504 Z309 Z309 Z309 Level 1 349 Normal C389 C389 C389 C389 C389 C389 C389 M330 M330 M330 M330 M330 M330 M330 U444 U444 Level 1 350 Normal P984 P984 P984 P984 P984 P984 P984 P984 P984 TT13 TT13 TT13 T687 J150 J150 Level 1 351 Normal T735 D126 D126 D126 D126 D126 D126 D423 X577 X577 N859 K135 K135 K135 K135 Level 1 352 Normal A238 A238 A238 A238 A238 A238 A238 A238 P570 P570 P570 272K 272K G392 G392 Level 1 353 Normal H640 H640 Y965 Y965 Y965 Y965 M321 C829 C829 C829 T260 T260 Level 1 354 Normal 6186 6186 6186 6186 6186 6186 6186 6186 DP## Z232 J706 J706 14W1 14W1 14W1 14W1 14W1 Level 1 355 Normal A759 SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY SVVY DP## DP## Level 1 356 Normal N074 N074 N074 N074 DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## W878 W878 G441 G441 G441 G441 G441 G441 G441 G441 Level 1 357 Normal R925 R925 R925 R925 R925 R925 R925 R925 2527 H635 E544 E544 W394 U170 U170 H612 H612 Level 1 358 Normal Z712 Z712 Z712 Z712 Z712 Z712 Z712 Z712 Z712 Z712 H850 H850 N901 N901 J179 J179 Level 2 140 Compact Z449 Z449 Z449 Z449 Z449 Z449 Z449 Z449 Z449 Z449 Z449 Level 2 141 Compact G278 G278 G278 G278 G278 G278 G278 G278 G278 W033 W033 W033 W033 W033 W033 W033 Level 2 142 Normal A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 61U1 F768 F768 21T1 21T1 21T1 21T1 21T1 21T1 21T1 Level 2 143 Normal T470 T470 T470 T470 T470 T470 T470 T470 T470 T470 T470 T470 0548 0548 0548 0548 Level 2 144 Normal 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 C458 C458 C458 X071 V900 V900 V900 V900 Level 2 145 Normal U679 U679 U679 U679 U679 U679 U679 U679 U679 V127 V127 V127 V127 V127 V127 V127 V127 V127 Level 2 0 Handicap G508 N551 N551 N040 N040 N040 N040 N040 N040 N040 N040 Level 2 0 Handicap NP## NP## NP## NP## G632 G632 G632 G632 G632 G632 Level 2 0 Handicap 5042 5042 5042 5042 5042 5042 5042 5042 5042 5042 5042 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING LOT DURATION STUDY
Lot Space Type Level Space 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 Level 2 146 Normal S996 S996 4734 4734 4734 4734 4734 4734 4734 4734 4734 4734 4734 N719 N719 N719 N719 Level 2 147 Normal K130 K130 K130 E011 95AR 95AK D599 D599 W430 W430 A557 A557 A557 A557 Level 2 148 Normal 2941 2941 2941 2941 2941 2941 2941 2941 2941 N166 N166 H544 H544 H544 H544 H544 Level 2 149 Normal H945 H945 H945 H945 H945 H945 H945 H945 H945 H945 U575 U575 U575 U575 U575 T879 Level 2 150 Normal D486 D984 N034 N034 N034 N034 D112 D112 D112 B549 H413 H413 H413 T879 Level 2 151 Normal 5185 5185 5185 EAIR EAIR EAIR S047 3047 3047 3047 X936 X936 X936 N762 N762 M064 Level 2 152 Normal 7284 7284 7284 7284 7284 7284 7284 723Y 723Y 723Y Z845 Z845 9825 9825 T027 T027 Level 2 153 Normal Z928 Z928 Z928 Z928 Z928 Z928 Z928 J063 L376 L376 W026 W026 W026 W026 Level 2 154 Normal 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 89R1 Level 2 155 Normal 0595 0595 0595 0595 0595 0595 0595 0595 0595 0595 TO93 TO93 TO93 TO93 TO93 Level 2 156 Normal 06RB 06RB 06RB 06RB 06RB 0GRB 0GRB Z852 Z852 Z852 D112 D112 D112 D112 D112 Level 2 157 Normal L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 Level 2 158 Normal 61U1 61U1 61U1 61U1 61U1 T881 T881 T881 M762 M762 M762 79Z1 79Z1 79Z1 Level 2 159 Normal 3219 3219 3219 3219 3219 3219 3219 3219 3219 D733 D733 D783 D783 D783 D783 Level 2 160 Normal J660 J660 J660 J660 J660 J660 J660 J660 J492 J492 J492 J492 J492 J492 Level 2 161 Normal DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## 9342 9342 P450 P450 P450 E390 E390 E390 E390 Level 2 162 Normal 9398 9398 9398 9398 9398 9398 9398 9398 9398 V436 V436 V436 V436 V436 V436 Level 2 163 Normal 7ZXP 7ZXP 7ZXP P696 P696 5889 5889 N139 N139 52N1 52N1 52N1 52N1 52N1 Level 2 164 Normal U329 U329 U329 U329 U329 U329 U329 U329 U329 U329 U329 K542 K542 K542 K542 Level 2 165 Normal DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## 3362 3362 3362 3362 3362 P179 P179 P179 P179 P179 Level 2 166 Normal 69N1 69N1 69N1 69N1 S378 S378 S378 S378 S378 90X0 90X0 90X0 90X0 90X0 Level 2 167 Normal NP## NP## NP## NP## NP## NP## 5358 5358 5358 5358 5358 5358 5358 5358 5358 Level 2 168 Normal E921 E921 E921 E921 E921 E921 E921 E921 H:50 H:50 H:50 H:50 H:50 H:50 Level 2 169 Normal C786 C786 C786 C786 C786 C786 C786 C786 C786 V132 V132 V132 V132 V132 Level 2 170 Normal D805 W379 W379 W379 W379 W379 W379 D112 Y600 Y600 R612 R612 R612 R612 R612 R612 Level 2 171 Compact 4002 4002 4002 4002 4002 4002 4002 4002 4002 W993 W993 V945 V945 V945 V945 Level 2 172 Normal B655 B655 B655 K946 K946 P180 P180 OJEN E389 E389 E389 E389 E389 Level 2 173 Normal 2828 2828 2828 2828 2828 2828 K828 K828 K828 5505 5505 T763 T763 Level 2 174 Normal T453 T453 T453 T453 T453 T453 T453 T453 T453 E205 B289 B289 B289 B289 B289 Level 2 175 Normal 9LRF 9LRF 9LRF 9LRF 9LRF 9LRF 9LRF 9LRF 9LRF U811 U811 U811 W815 W815 W815 W815 W815 W815 Level 2 176 Normal M550 M550 M550 M550 M550 M550 M550 M550 N213 N213 N213 N213 N213 Level 2 177 Normal NP## V811 V811 V811 V811 P391 P391 P391 K972 K972 K972 K972 K972 K972 Level 2 178 Normal U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 U662 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING LOT DURATION STUDY
Lot Space Type Level Space 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 Level 2 179 Normal C307 C307 C307 C307 C307 P391 C307 C307 C307 C307 Z779 Z779 Z779 Z779 Level 2 180 Normal N801 N801 N801 N801 N801 S423 S423 S423 2985 2985 2985 2985 2985 2985 Level 2 181 Normal J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 J804 Level 2 310 Normal 4871 4871 4871 4871 4871 4871 K498 B394 B394 U920 1398 1398 3428 3428 3428 Level 2 311 Normal 5422 5422 5422 5422 5422 5422 S422 S422 S422 C364 7918 7918 7918 7918 7918 Level 2 312 Normal H446 H446 H446 H446 H446 H446 H446 H446 H446 9532 9532 9532 9532 9532 Level 2 313 Normal L798 L798 L798 L798 L798 L798 L798 L798 G664 G664 G664 G664 G664 G664 Level 2 314 Normal C959 C959 C959 C959 C959 C959 C959 C959 C959 K452 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 Level 2 315 Normal R601 R601 R601 G937 G937 G937 G937 G937 G937 G937 G937 G937 G937 G937 Level 2 316 Normal T957 T957 T957 T957 T957 T957 T957 T957 T957 T957 A643 A643 A643 A643 A643 Level 2 317 Normal E858 E858 E858 E858 E858 E858 E858 E858 E858 E858 N170 N170 N170 N170 Level 2 318 Normal N529 D65Z D192 D192 D192 D192 D192 D192 D192 1382 1382 1382 1382 1382 Level 2 319 Normal D533 D533 D533 D533 D533 D533 D533 D533 D533 K257 9129 9129 9129 Level 2 320 Normal E617 E617 E617 E617 E617 E617 E617 E617 E617 YO47 YO47 YO47 YO47 YO47 Level 2 321 Normal 80C1 80C1 80C1 80C1 0983 0983 0983 0983 0983 0983 0983 A840 A840 Level 2 322 Compact W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 W336 Level 2 323 Normal A116 A116 A116 A116 A116 A116 A116 A116 A116 G782 G782 G782 G782 G782 Level 2 324 Normal B485 B485 B485 B485 B485 B485 B485 B485 C173 32V2 32V2 32V2 32V2 32V2 Level 2 325 Normal K093 K093 K093 T175 T175 T175 T175 T175 T175 D537 J643 J643 J643 J643 J643 Level 2 326 Normal C101 C101 DP## X477 X677 W445 W445 V913 V913 V913 V913 V913 V913 Level 2 327 Normal T021 T021 T021 T021 T021 T021 T021 T021 T021 T021 7286 7286 7286 7286 Level 2 328 Normal V453 V453 V453 V453 V453 U453 U453 U453 7869 7869 7869 7869 7869 Level 2 329 Normal 7174 C867 8252 6949 E001 X985 M637 M637 9YTF 6164 6164 L055 L055 Level 2 330 Normal C285 C285 C285 C285 U641 U641 U641 U641 D933 D933 J160 J160 J160 J160 Level 2 331 Normal DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## Z041 Z041 ZK29 ZK29 ZK29 J222 N533 N533 Level 2 332 Normal N929 N929 N929 N929 N929 N929 N929 N929 B900 J606 J606 X801 X801 X801 X801 Level 2 333 Compact G425 W004 W004 3941 G464 5864 M892 M892 M892 M892 M892 M892 M892 M892 Level 2 334 Normal S508 S508 S508 UVHR UVHR W379 W379 W379 W379 6867 6867 6867 6867 6867 6867 Level 2 335 Normal E093 X226 X226 X226 X226 DP## K354 K354 K354 K354 K354 K354 K354 K354 K354 Level 3 182 Normal 5EYT 5EYT 5EYT 5EYT 5EYT 5EYT 5EYT 5EYT Z935 Z935 Level 3 183 Normal 6FVJ 6FVJ V816 V816 V816 V816 D057 Level 3 184 Normal R825 R825 R825 R825 R825 R825 R825 R825 H899 H899 Level 3 185 Normal B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING LOT DURATION STUDY
Lot Space Type Level Space 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 Level 3 186 Normal JJ67 JJ67 JJ67 JJ67 JJ67 JJ67 JJ67 JJ67 JJ67 JJ67 Level 3 187 Normal G936 G936 G936 G936 L541 L541 L541 L541 L541 L541 Level 3 188 Normal Y754 K092 B653 R601 R601 R601 R601 R601 Level 3 189 Normal Z760 Z760 Z760 Z760 Z760 Z760 Z760 Z760 Level 3 190 Normal L062 L062 L062 L062 L062 L062 L062 L062 L062 Level 3 191 Normal L722 Z196 Y330 Level 3 192 Normal Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Level 3 193 Normal V139 D819 D819 L229 L229 L229 Level 3 194 Normal 2582 2582 2582 2582 2582 2582 2582 Level 3 195 Normal D448 D448 D448 D448 Level 3 196 Normal X733 W430 W430 C020 C020 C020 Level 3 197 Normal K068 K068 U253 U253 Level 3 198 Normal 7661 7661 7661 7661 Level 3 199 Normal H394 H394 H394 H394 H394 H394 H394 Level 3 200 Normal Level 3 201 Normal E868 E868 E868 E868 E868 E868 E868 Level 3 202 Normal DP## DP## Level 3 203 Normal 6GJB 6GJB 6GJB 6GJB 6GJB 6GJB 6GJB Level 3 204 Normal D496 A544 Level 3 205 Normal P431 P431 P431 P431 P431 P431 P431 P431 P431 Level 3 206 Normal H210 C741 A921 A921 A921 A921 Level 3 207 Normal Y634 A051 A051 A051 A051 A051 A051 A051 Level 3 208 Normal P876 L158 I787 I787 Level 3 209 Normal H947 H947 H947 H947 H947 H947 H947 H947 Level 3 210 Electric Vehicle 0694 N741 Level 3 211 Electric Vehicle DP## C374 Level 3 212 Electric Vehicle Level 3 213 Normal 5378 5378 5378 5378 5378 5378 X322 S831 S831 S831 S831 S831 S831 S831 Level 3 214 Normal J842 J842 F847 V754 V754 W602 V130 V130 V130 Level 3 215 Normal Z836 Z836 Z836 Z836 V754 V754 V754 V754 M505 A427 A427 A427 Level 3 216 Normal 8YKW 8YKW K239 K239 DP## A437 A437 A437 A437 A437 Z337 Z337 Level 3 0 Handicap Level 3 0 Handicap Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING LOT DURATION STUDY
Lot Space Type Level Space 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 Level 3 0 Handicap Level 3 217 Normal 83V1 83V1 83V1 83V1 83V1 83V1 B838 B838 B838 B838 B838 B838 D260 D260 D260 D260 Level 3 218 Normal N355 N355 N355 N355 N355 N355 D423 Level 3 219 Normal 5960 5960 5960 5960 7426 N469 N469 Level 3 220 Normal F761 F761 F761 F761 F761 7426 7426 7426 F743 F743 F743 F743 Level 3 221 Normal J101 J101 C563 C563 C563 C563 C563 C563 C563 C563 C563 C563 Level 3 222 Normal M926 R477 R477 55E1 U869 U869 U869 U869 U869 U869 U869 Level 3 223 Normal T829 W651 DP## DP## Level 3 224 Normal N035 N035 S969 G965 G965 G965 Level 3 225 Normal ESC# Level 3 226 Normal W690 342T O6A2 O6A2 Level 3 227 Normal L030 L030 Level 3 228 Normal 3101 3101 3101 A892 Level 3 229 Normal Level 3 230 Normal 3067 Level 3 231 Normal H216 H216 H216 H216 H216 Level 3 232 Normal Level 3 233 Normal B149 O4N1 D499 Level 3 234 Normal 6675 6675 6675 6675 6675 6675 6675 A722 Level 3 235 Normal N153 N153 Level 3 236 Normal Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129 T988 T988 T988 T988 Level 3 237 Normal B327 B327 F889 F889 F889 U377 H421 H421 Level 3 238 Normal P043 P043 P043 P043 P043 P043 P043 Level 3 239 Normal S276 S276 S276 S276 S276 S276 S276 S276 S276 S276 Level 3 240 Normal P588 P588 P588 M531 M531 95P1 P588 LO69 LO69 LO69 LO69 LO69 LO69 LO69 Level 3 241 Normal F235 F235 F235 F235 F235 F235 F235 F235 F235 F235 F235 F235 Level 3 242 Normal F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 Level 3 243 Normal RTO# RTO# B994 B994 B994 57C1 57C1 57C1 57C1 57C1 57C1 57C1 57C1 57C1 Level 3 244 Normal P537 P537 P537 P537 P537 P537 P537 P537 Level 3 245 Normal W789 W789 W789 W789 W789 W789 W789 W789 Level 3 246 Normal 10R1 10R1 10R1 10R1 10R1 10R1 10R1 10R1 Level 3 247 Normal F127 F127 F127 F127 F127 F127 F127 F127 F127 F127 Level 3 248 Normal L781 L781 L781 L781 L781 L781 L781 L781 L781 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING LOT DURATION STUDY
Lot Space Type Level Space 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 Level 3 249 Normal K978 K978 K978 K978 K978 K978 L008 L008 L008 Level 3 250 Normal Y827 Y827 Y827 Y827 Y827 Y827 Level 3 251 Normal U348 U348 U348 U348 U348 U348 U348 Level 3 252 Normal C004 C004 C004 C004 C004 C004 C004 DP## DP## Level 3 253 Normal X077 X077 X077 X077 X077 X077 X077 X077 X077 Level 3 254 Normal F175 F175 F175 F175 F175 F175 F175 O1S4 O1S4 O1S4 Level 3 255 Normal M472 M472 M472 LN9K LN9K 8006 8006 8006 Level 3 256 Normal R524 R524 R524 R524 R524 R524 R524 R524 R524 F457 Level 3 257 Normal S663 S663 S663 S663 S663 S663 S663 S663 S663 S663 S663 Level 3 258 Normal M858 Level 3 259 Normal E084 E367 E367 E367 E367 E367 Level 3 260 Normal DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## Level 3 261 Normal J302 J302 J302 J302 J302 J302 Level 3 262 Normal H230 H230 H230 H230 H230 H230 H230 H230 H230 H230 Level 3 263 Normal Level 3 264 Normal 2955 2955 Level 3 265 Normal X502 X502 X502 X502 X502 X502 X502 X502 X502 X502 Level 3 266 Normal Level 3 267 Normal G907 G907 Level 3 268 Normal A388 DP## DP## T881 Level 3 269 Normal 7379 Level 3 270 Normal Z773 Z773 Z773 H352 Level 3 271 Normal X567 K281 K281 K281 K281 K281 K281 K281 Level 3 272 Normal V809 Level 3 273 Normal T870 T870 V500 V500 48N1 48N1 48N1 48N1 48N1 48N1 48N1 48N1 48N1 48N1 Level 3 274 Normal G868 G868 R960 R960 R960 B890 B890 Level 3 275 Normal M999 M999 M999 M999 S504 S504 S504 F54P F54P F54P Level 3 276 Normal C786 C786 L897 L897 H843 N896 N896 Level 3 277 Normal A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 A645 Level 3 278 Normal P162 P162 P162 P162 P162 K090 K090 F326 F326 Level 3 279 Normal 4567 V147 V147 V147 H788 N663 N663 N663 Level 3 280 Normal 7428 X354 X354 X354 Y275 Y275 X630 X630 Level 3 281 Compact R806 R806 R806 R806 R806 R806 R806 R806 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING LOT DURATION STUDY
Lot Space Type Level Space 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 6:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 10:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 Level 3 282 Compact Y999 Y999 Y999 Y999 DP## DP## DP## DP## DP## Level 3 283 Normal J203 D430 D430 D430 D430 D430 Level 3 284 Normal C678 C678 C678 C678 C678 C678 C678 C678 C678 Level 3 285 Normal W022 W022 W022 W022 W022 W022 U262 Level 3 286 Normal F628 F628 F628 F628 F628 Level 3 287 Normal 7270 7270 7270 7270 Level 3 288 Normal C207 S852 S852 J841 J841 J841 J841 J841 Level 3 289 Normal J827 J827 Level 3 290 Normal F030 F030 Level 3 291 Normal R244 R244 R244 R244 Level 3 292 Normal 5185 5185 5185 5185 5185 5185 5185 Level 3 293 Normal 5652 5652 4095 Level 3 294 Normal 4099 4099 4099 7ZXP 7ZXP 7ZXP 7ZXP 7ZXP 7ZXP Level 3 295 Normal B823 B823 B823 B823 B823 B823 B823 Level 3 296 Normal X376 X376 X376 X376 X376 X376 X376 X376 X376 Level 3 297 Normal 2598 2598 N166 N166 A911 A911 A911 A911 A911 Level 3 298 Normal D338 D338 D338 D338 D338 D338 D338 Level 3 299 Normal S549 S549 90A1 90A1 90A1 90A1 90A1 90A1 90A1 90A1 Level 3 300 Normal H319 H319 A627 G434 G434 C369 C369 Level 3 301 Normal G052 G052 G052 G052 G052 G052 G052 G052 G052 Level 3 302 Normal 1274 1274 1274 1274 1274 1274 1274 1274 1274 1274 1274 1274 Level 3 303 Normal H776 H776 H776 H776 H776 H776 H776 H776 H776 Level 3 304 Normal B105 B105 B105 B105 B105 B105 B105 B105 2188 Level 3 305 Normal P908 P908 P908 P908 P908 P908 P908 P908 P908 P908 Level 3 306 Normal J302 J302 4480 4480 Z111 Z111 Z111 Z111 Z111 Z111 Level 3 307 Normal J482 J482 J482 J482 J482 J482 J482 J482 J482 J482 Level 3 308 Normal V229 V229 V229 V229 V229 V229 V229 V229 Level 3 309 Normal M504 M504 M504 M504 M504 M504 M504 M504 3628 3628
Appendix A4 Weekend Lot C Parking Duration Survey
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax (626) 564-0969 [email protected] PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016 LOCATION: PARKING LOT C
Space Type 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 1200-100 100-200 200-300 300-400 400-500 500-600 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 No. - POLICE
HANDICAPPED 47NR 47NR 47NR 47NR 47NR 61B2 61B2 G307 G307 G307 G307 J764 J764 J764 J764
HANDICAPPED N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665 N665
HANDICAPPED 4602 4602 M504 M504 L247 L247 L247L L247 L247 S388 S388 S388 S388 S388 S388 S388 S388
HANDICAPPED SHND SHND SHND X664 X664 X664 D354 D354 D354 D354 WT15 WT15 3T38 3T38 3T38
111 Metered Parking X007 X004 W424 W424 W424 W424 W424 W424 W424 3535 3535 3535 3535 G273 R658
112 Metered Parking 9711 V119 V119 R348 R348 R348 R348 R348 R348 R348 R348 R348 Z552 Z552 NO PLATE
113 Metered Parking 4761 4761 4761 4761 4761 4761 4761 LGEE LGEE LGEE LGEE LGEE LOVE LOVE LOVE LOVE
114 Metered Parking 8864 8864 8864 8864 8864 8864 8864 5408 5408 5408 S327 S327 S327 S327 P004 P004
115 Metered Parking G442 G442 B735 B735 B735 B735 B735 B735 B735 U041 H976 H976 H976 H976 P952 H405 H405
116 Metered Parking 9322 9322 S812 S812 S812 S812 S812 S812 S812 S812 A421 A421 A421 A421 A421
117 Metered Parking NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE K362 K362 K362 G136 G136 L498 G136 N942 N942 N942
118 Metered Parking V350 V350 V350 V350 V350 V350 V350 6306 6306 6306 6306 X595 X595 T552 T552
119 Metered Parking J595 J595 M987 M987 M987 M987 M987 E762 E762 P118 L244 L244 Y301 Y301 T755
120 Metered Parking F364 F364 F364 F364 W269 W269 W269 T252 B760 B760 B760 D498 D498 D498 D498 D498 V815
121 Metered Parking 9711 9711 9711 9711 M823 M823 A726 A726 R147 R147 R147 R147 R019
122 Metered Parking N455 N455 N455 N455 N455 N455 N455 N455 J570 J570 J570 K103 K103 K103 Y726
123 Metered Parking X972 X972 M149 M149 M149 M149 E448 V067 V067 T754 T754 T754
124 Metered Parking L763 L763 X685 X685 X685 X685 X685 X685 T295 T295 T295 T295 T295 S973 S973
125 Metered Parking R581 R581 R581 R581 W051 W051 Y855 H888 H888 H888 H888 B819
126 Metered Parking D836 D836 E703 E703 W522 W522 X161 X161 X161 X161 X161 H959 H959 N011
127 Metered Parking X879 X879 N181 N181 N181 N181 N181 Y154 Y154 Y154 Y154 NO PLATE
128 Metered Parking E809 E809 E809 E809 E809 E809 E809 E809 F767 R477 R477 R477 R477
129 Metered Parking W792 W792 W792 W792 W792 W792 F753 F753 H916 E217 2JEF 2JEF 2JEF 2JEF 2JEF
130 Metered Parking B597 B597 B597 Y247 Y247 Y247 Y247 Y247 Y247 W399 5IBI 5IBI 5IBI
131 Metered Parking NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE 59T1 59T1 59T1 59T1 59T1 59T1
132 Metered Parking D467 D467 D467 D467 D467 D467 M001 M001 X833 X833 X833
133 Metered Parking 1459 1459 1459 1459 1459 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE 5870 5870 5870 5870 5870 5870
134 Metered Parking P603 P603 P603 P603 P603 P603 P603 P603 T682 U299 U299 U299 U299
135 Metered Parking R402 R402 R402 R402 R402 R402 R402 R402 71WA 71WA 71WA 8HMN 8HMN J117 C106 C106 C106
136 Metered Parking D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 D707 A195 A195 A195 I991 I991
137 Metered Parking N754 N754 N754 N754 N754 N754 ATOW ATOW ATOW M892 M892 M892 M892 M892 M892 M892
138 Metered Parking A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 A639 N628 N628 N628 N628 N628 N628
139 Metered Parking E054 E054 E054 7T2T 7T2T 7T2T 5092 R989 R989 R989 R989
140 Metered Parking 6329
141 Metered Parking 3808 3808 3808 3808 3808 U072 U072 U072 U072 U072 U072 U072 S166
142 Metered Parking Y087 Y087 Y087 Y087 Y087 Y087 Y087 Y606 Y606 Y606 Y606 Y606 Y606 G511 G511
143 Metered Parking P138 P138 P138 P138 P138 P138 P138 P138 K959 K959 K959 K959 Y275 Y275 Y275 B662 B662 B662
144 Metered Parking 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 4608 E467 E467 E467 E467 E467
145 Metered Parking 4679 4679 4679 4679 4679 4679 4679 4679 4679 K111 K111 X326 X326 F027 F027 F027 1747 1747 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016 LOCATION: PARKING LOT C
Space Type 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 1200-100 100-200 200-300 300-400 400-500 500-600 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 No. Handicapped TENQ TENQ F014 F014 W718 D799 D799 D799 D799 5XFE E758 E758
Handicapped 36ER 36ER 36ER 257V 257V 257V Z036 Z036 Z036 F305 R793
Handicapped 93FM 93FM P350 4205 4205 A610 A610 A610
146 Metered Parking B649 B649 B649 D568 D568 D568 D568 D568 D568 G866 G866 G866 Z205 Z205 C568
147 Metered Parking 5938 5938 5938 E640 E640 E640 E640 E640 E640 E640 E640 CHLN CHLN CHLN CHLN
148 Metered Parking Y697 Y697 Y697 Y697 Y697 Y697 Y697 L831 L831 L600 L600 M499 J811 J811 J811 J811 E922 E922
149 Metered Parking N917 J514 J514 J514 J514 J514 L352 L322 L322 L322 Z015 Z015 Z015 Z015
150 Metered Parking 5749 5749 5749 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE L088 L088 P403 F694 MAMA B806 B806 F673
151 Metered Parking 2072 2072 2072 2072 2072 2072 2072 2072 2072 T560 T560 X063 X063 X063
152 Metered Parking P620 P620 P620 P620 P620 P620 P620 P620 A580 A580 A580 A580 A580 A748
153 Metered Parking L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 L743 M302 H715 H715 Z949 Z949
154 Metered Parking G940 G940 G940 G940 G940 G940 G940 W004 W004 W004 U209 E585 V477 V477 V477
155 Metered Parking V214 V214 V214 V214 V214 V214 V214 V214 Z295 Z295 Z295 Z295 D205 D205 4026
156 Metered Parking U623 U623 U623 V779 V779 V779 V779 V779 V779 V779 V779 S469 W349 W349 W349 W349 W349
157 Metered Parking G209 G209 G209 G209 G209 G209 G209 G209 Y358 Y358 Y358 Y358 J369 J369 J369
158 Metered Parking V688 V688 V688 V688 V688 V688 V688 V688 V688 S040 T2 T2 Y867 Y867
159 Metered Parking N027 N027 N027 N027 N027 Y216 A689 A689 A689 A689 A689 A689 A689 A689 A689
160 Metered Parking C490 C490 C490 C490 C490 V051 V051 V051 V051 V051 V051 V051 U544 U544 U544
161 Metered Parking G877 G877 E739 E739 E739 H723 H723 H723 H723 O877 O877 X243 A752 A752 A752
162 Metered Parking A811 A811 A811 A811 A811 A811 T423 T423 T423 T423 T423 T423 S812 S812 S812
163 Metered Parking D901 D901 D901 D901 D901 M484 M484 M484 NO PLATES NO PLATES NO PLATES A973 A973 A973 A973
164 Metered Parking Y445 Y445 Y445 Y445 Y445 Y445 Y445 Y445 F638 F638 A212 A212 A212
165 Metered Parking F404 F404 F404 F404 K562 K562 K562 K562 K562 M959 M959 L044 L044
166 Metered Parking A238 A238 5528 5528 5528 5528 5528 5528 5528 V714 7007 7007 W222 W222 W222
167 Metered Parking F863 F863 F863 F863 F863 F863 F863 F863 F863 F863 W957 W957 W957
168 Metered Parking H802 H802 H802 H802 H802 H802 H802 H802 H802 X246 X246 X246
169 Metered Parking J235 J235 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691 L691
170 Metered Parking F084 F084 F084 F084 F084 X602 X602 A028 A028 A028 6762 6762
171 Metered Parking C426 C426 K794 K794 K794 Y326 W862 W862 W862 W862 D935 D935 D935 D935 D935
172 Metered Parking U266 U266 U266 U266 5LHE 5LHE 5LHE D703 D703 D703 H482 H482 T241 T241
173 Metered Parking J777 J777 J777 J777 J777 J777 J777 J777 C911 C911 M759 M759 1339 1339 1339 1339
174 Metered Parking D888 D888 D888 D888 D888 D888 D888 D888 D888 NO PLATES NO PLATES L511 L511 NO PLATES NO PLATE
175 Metered Parking Z086 Z086 T095 T095 T095 K564 K564 K564 K564 K564 K564 K564 A753 A753 A753
176 Metered Parking R046 R046 R046 R046 T530 T530 T530 T530 T530 8997 8997 H607 G831 G831
177 Metered Parking A693 A693 A693 A693 A693 D609 D609 P563 P563 P563 P563 P563 P563
178 Metered Parking X714 X714 A062 A062 A062 A062 A062 A062 A062 A062 A062 N104 N104
179 Metered Parking V639 V639 W205 W205 W205 W205 W205 M564 M564 M564 M564 M564 R335 R335 R335
180 Metered Parking B655 B655 B655 B655 B655 B655 B655 B655 B655 B655 P709 P709
181 Metered Parking 5LWM 5LWM 5LWM 5LWM 5LWM 5LWM 5LWM D841 D841 M040 M040 M040 M040 M040
182 Metered Parking B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 B759 C415 Z288 Z288 E209 E209 E209
183 Metered Parking E252 E252 OJEN OJEN F275 F275 F275 F275 F275 Y535 X826 X826 X826 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016 LOCATION: PARKING LOT C
Space Type 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 1200-100 100-200 200-300 300-400 400-500 500-600 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 No. 184 Metered Parking Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447 Y447
185 Metered Parking G825 G825 E338 E338 E338 G743 G743 G743 G743 W141 W141 W141 H876
186 Metered Parking C816 C816 C816 C816 C816 C816 C816 C816 C816 C816 S265 S265 S265
187 Metered Parking P403 P403 P403 P403 P403 A604 A604 6699 6699 6699 6699 6699 A380 A380 A380
188 Metered Parking 28B2 28B2 G559 G559 G559 E822 E822 C955 C955 C955 E899 E899 B743 B743
189 Metered Parking 1AA8 1AA8 1AA8 1AA8 1AA8 S504 S504 T783 T783 T783 T783 T783 T783
190 Metered Parking V851 V851 V851 V851 V851 N222 N222 N222 F992 J752 J752 J752 J752
191 Metered Parking F768 F768 K060 K060 F503 F503 F503 F503 F503 NO PLATE NO PLATE
192 Metered Parking 2582 2582 2582 2582 2582 C456 C456 U128 L363 L363 L363 L363
193 Metered Parking D412 D412 D412 D412 D412 D412 D412 D412 D412 D412 D412
194 Metered Parking V809 V809 V809 V809 V809 8DEY 8DEY 8DEY 8DEY 8DEY N918
195 Metered Parking 8PTZ 8PTZ 8PTZ 8PTZ A655 A655 A655 A655 A655 A655 A655
196 Metered Parking A651 A651 A651 A651 A651 A651 A651 W660 G986 G986 Y006 Y006 Y006
197 Metered Parking W086 W086 W086 R074 R074 R262 R262 R262 R262 2836 BOY1 BOY1 BOY1
198 Metered Parking R470 R470 R470 R470 R470 R470 R470 H916 Y432 Y432 Y432
199 Metered Parking V933 V933 V933 V933 V933 0820 0820 0820 E556 E556
200 Metered Parking N212 N212 N212 M999 M999 P472 P472 P472 V195 H996 H996
201 Metered Parking T650 T650 T650 T337 T337 T337 T337 E593 E593 E593 E593 E593
202 Metered Parking J390 J390 J390 J390 J390 J390 J390 J390 J390 J390 L498
203 Metered Parking M999 M999 M999 M999 M999 M999 M999 M999 L813 L813 N405 N405 N405 R553 W054 W054 W054
204 Metered Parking R765 R765 R765 R765 R765 R765 R765 R765 R765 R765 S852 S852 S852
205 Metered Parking NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE
206 Metered Parking PY4U PY4U PY4U PY4U 8503 8503 8503 8503 8503
207 Metered Parking U383 U383 U383 X451 X451 X451 E463 E463 E463 R896 E314 E314 E314
208 Metered Parking NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE V155 V155 6454 6454 6454 6454 6454 6454 6454
209 Metered Parking C285 C285 C285 C285 C285 S196 S196 D987 D987 V904 D251 D251
210 Electric Car NO PLATE
211 Electric Car D379 D379 D536
212 Electric Car A915 A915 A915
213 Metered Parking 0926 0926 0926 0926 0926 0926 0926 V722 V722 V722 V722
214 Metered Parking G444 G444 2758 2758 K393 K393 K393 K393 K393 K393 K393 K393 K393 K393
215 Metered Parking 5145 5145 5145 5145 5145 C923 C923 C923 G742 T151 T151 J914 J914 C653 C653
216 Metered Parking Z951 Z951 Z951 Z951 Z951 Z951 Z951 Z951 Z951 C653 C653 C653 C653
Handicapped D543 D543 D543 D543 D543 M521 M521 M521 NISK
Handicapped G976 G976 G976 G976 G976 G976 9262 9262 9262 9262 9262
Handicapped P153 G310 G310 G310 SHUK SHUK SHUK SHUK
217 Metered Parking 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 X861 06A2 06A2 06A2
218 Metered Parking K130 K130 K130 K130 K130 K130 U774 Y774 1604 1604 1604 1604 1604 1604 1604
219 Metered Parking 83VI 83VI 83VI 83VI 83VI 83VI 83VI 83VI X950 X950 X950 X950 X950
220 Metered Parking 2030 2030 F045 F045 F045 F045 F045 F045 F045 F045 T255 V963 V963
221 Metered Parking Y028 Y028 8221 8221 8221 8221 8221 8221 8221 C067 C067 U458 U458 U458 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016 LOCATION: PARKING LOT C
Space Type 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 1200-100 100-200 200-300 300-400 400-500 500-600 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 No. 222 Metered Parking M633 M633 M633 M633 O412 O412 O412 O412 1039 1039 1039 O567
223 Metered Parking Z270 Z270 U990 U990 U990 U990 F902 F902 F902 F902 F902 F902 F902 F902
224 Metered Parking H785 H785 H785 H785 H785 G164 G164 R631 R631 R631 O269 O269
225 Metered Parking B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951 B951
226 Metered Parking N068 N068 N068 N068 O207 O207 O207 O207 O207 T090 22HR 22HR
227 Metered Parking U213 U213 U213 U213 U213 98BB 98BB 98BB 98BB 98BB 98BB 98BB 98BB 4LGP 1701 1701 1701
228 Metered Parking B696 B696 B696 B696 N603 N603 N603 N603 G876 G876 G876 G876
229 Metered Parking 77VI 77VI 77VI 77VI S106 S106 S106 A148 A148 A148 C854 C854
230 Metered Parking 8821 8821 L911 U345 U345 U345 D572 D572 B365
231 Metered Parking J903 J903 J903 J903 YWLF YWLF H069 H069 H069
232 Metered Parking N741 N741 N741 D882 D882 P952 P952
233 Metered Parking X740 X740 D432 D432 922L 922L 922L 922L
234 Metered Parking NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE E164 E164 E164 E164 E164 S725 S725 H977 H977 H977 H977
235 Metered Parking HTG1 HTG1 HTG1 B414 B414 Z053 Z053 Z053 Z053
236 Metered Parking N841 N841 N841 N841 W584 W584 K594 K594 M195 M195 M195 M195
237 Metered Parking T649 T649 H603 H603 H603 Y057 Y057 Y057
238 Metered Parking G986 G986 G986 M504 M504 M504 M504 M504 W800 W800 W800 W800 W800 W800 W800
239 Metered Parking 6441 6441 6441 T703 A814 A814 A814 A814 A814 D943 D943 D943
240 Metered Parking Z825 Z825 B900 E176 E176 L361 L361 L361 L361
241 Metered Parking T548 T548 T252 T252 T252 T252 4ILV 4ILV 4ILV B789 B789 B789
242 Metered Parking P150 P150 P150 P150 P150 G541 G541 P227 P227
243 Metered Parking R472 R472 R472 R472 R472 R472 R472 R472 R472 R472 R472 R472 R472
244 Metered Parking 4346 4346 4346 4346 N856 N856 J045 J045 J045 J045
245 Metered Parking G962 G962 G962 G962 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE U342
246 Metered Parking W815 W815 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE
247 Metered Parking 5430 T711 T711 T711 T711 T711
248 Metered Parking F636 F636 F636 F636 O643 O643 OEKV OEKV E049 E049 E049 E049 E049
249 Metered Parking N447 N447 N447 K752 6702 6702 6702 6702 T871
250 Metered Parking F858 F858 38X1 38X1 K887 K887 M477 M477 M477
251 Metered Parking T646 T646 T646 M710 M710 NO PLATE NO PLATE
252 Metered Parking Z005 Z005 Z005 Z005 Z005 Z005 Z005
253 Metered Parking Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129 Y129
254 Metered Parking 1588 1588 1588 1588 1588 1588 1588 F922 F922
255 Metered Parking D974 D974 D974 D974 P180 P180 P180 P180 P180 P180 P180 P180
256 Metered Parking E864 E864 E864 L401 L401 L401 L401 P311 P311 P311 P311 J845 J845 J845
257 Metered Parking S998 S998 S998 S998 S998 S998 S998 S998 S998 T544 8709
258 Metered Parking T173 T173 T173 T173 T173 T173 T110 T110 T110 5284 5284 5284
259 Metered Parking D781 50U1 50U1 50U1 B731 B731 C464 C464 C464
260 Metered Parking E934 E934 E934 N747 V746 V746 W274 W274 W274 W274 W274 W274
261 Metered Parking 2132 2132 6218 NO PLATE Z948 Z948 X680 X680 9465 9465 9465
262 Metered Parking U004 U004 U004 U004 U004 U004 U004 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE R019 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016 LOCATION: PARKING LOT C
Space Type 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 1200-100 100-200 200-300 300-400 400-500 500-600 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 No. 263 Metered Parking NO PLATE NO PLATE H969 H969 H969 H969 H969 H969 H969
264 Metered Parking B217 B217 B217 B217 B217 B217 B217 Y357 Y357 Y357 Y357 V897
265 Metered Parking M587 M587 M587 M587 M587 U611 E601 K423 K423 K432 E797 W712 6262 6262
266 Metered Parking F940 F940 F940 0RXZ 0RXY Y346 Y346 C368 C368 Z913 Z913 Z913
267 Metered Parking P385 P385 P385 P385 X915 X915 X915 Z722 Z722 Z722 R427 P643 T888 T888 T888
268 Metered Parking L283 L283 L283 T533 T533 T533 T533 T533 T533 J921 J921 J921
269 Metered Parking C845 C845 C845 C845 B208 B208 B208 Z522 Z522 Y566 Y566 Y566
270 Metered Parking C690 C690 C690 C690 D739 D739 P782 P782 P782 G564 G564 G564 80BW 80BW
271 Metered Parking N254 N254 N254 V025 V025 N074 N074 5771 5771 J686 J686 X862 X862 X862
272 Metered Parking E751 E751 E751 H564 S521 S521 S521 S521 S521 V638 V638 V638
273 Metered Parking S285 S285 S285 S285 S285 X021 X021 I390 I390 I390 I390 I390
274 Metered Parking L320 L320 L320 L320 L320 L320 L320 D141 D141 D141 D141 J774 J774
275 Metered Parking W510 W510 W510 E510 W510 W510 W510 W510 W510 RSFN RSFN RSFN RSFN E351 E351
276 Metered Parking Z398 Z398 Z398 Z398 Y874 Y874 Y874 Y874 Y874 E117 E117 E117 T151 T151
277 Metered Parking G814 G814 G814 G814 G814 G814 G814 T238 T238 T238 T238 T238 7893 7893 7893
278 Metered Parking N336 N336 N336 N336 N336 N336 N336 B348 B348 B348 B348 J380 J380 J380
279 Metered Parking R243 R243 R243 R243 R243 R243 R243 R243 R243 R806 R806 R806 R806 R806 R806
280 Metered Parking J743 J743 J743 L095 L095 L095 L095 L095 L095 J839 J839 Y084 Y084
281 Metered Parking V255 V255 V255 J804 J804 J804 N104 N104 N104 V016 B451 B451
282 Metered Parking G850 G850 R207 R207 R207 R207 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE
283 Metered Parking 9718 9718 9718 9718 9718 9718 9718 Z140 Z140 H873 H873
284 Metered Parking D694 D694 D694 D694 D694 D694 D694 D694 D694 L748 L748 L748 V593 V593
285 Metered Parking P474 P474 P474 P474 P474 P474 P474 X516 X516 G836 G836 G836 K032 K032 K032
286 Metered Parking R197 R197 R197 R197 R197 X880 X880 G333 G333 G333 5LWM 5LWM R919 R919 R919
287 Metered Parking 12H1 12H1 12H1 W802 W802 W802 W802 RUSA RUSA E143 E143 E143 E143 E143
288 Metered Parking E825 E825 E825 E825 D802 D802 D802 D802 D802 D802 D802 57K1 G030 G030
289 Metered Parking G501 G501 G501 G501 G501 V839 V839 V839 N897 N897 N897 E517 E517
290 Metered Parking S951 S951 S951 S951 P409 P409 M308 M308 M308 M308 M308 M308 J654
291 Metered Parking G965 G965 G965 G965 R909 54A0 54A0 54A0 A626 V100 V100 V100 9155 9155 9155
292 Metered Parking K912 K912 K912 K912 K912 C464 C464 C464 C464 C464 C464 J092 J092 J092
293 Metered Parking A505 A505 A505 A505 A505 A505 L588 L588 L588 T646 T646 T646 T646
294 Metered Parking G909 G909 G909 G909 G909 W327 W327 W327 W327 W327 W327 W327 W327 W327 W327
295 Metered Parking V639 V639 V639 Z768 Z768 Z768 D198 D198 BT44 BT44 C791 C791
296 Metered Parking M407 M407 M407 P707 P707 P707 E412 E412 E412 E412 P669 NO PLATE NO PLATE
297 Metered Parking B112 W801 W801 W801 L500 L500 N330 N330 M806 M806 M806 M806
298 Metered Parking E019 E019 E019 G981 G981 G981 G981 G981 D881 D881 B606 B606
299 Metered Parking 8805 8805 8805 W087 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE A528 A528 A528
300 Metered Parking 1611 1611 1611 1611 1611 T308 T308 T308 T308 2341 2341 B878 B878 B878 B878
301 Metered Parking A405 A405 A405 A405 A405 A405 A405 A405 A405 A405 A405 V795
302 Metered Parking 614V 614V 614V 614V 614V 614V 25ZL 25ZL 25ZL 25ZL H471 H471
303 Metered Parking T802 T802 T802 T802 T802 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 R376 R376 R376 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016 LOCATION: PARKING LOT C
Space Type 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 1200-100 100-200 200-300 300-400 400-500 500-600 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 No. 304 Metered Parking G616 G616 G616 A146 A146 U751 U751 U751 Z373 L839 L839 L839 F259 F259
305 Metered Parking J752 J752 J752 A818 A818 A818 A818 T017 M837 M837 Y281
306 Metered Parking N972 N972 N972 N972 V047 L538 L538 L538 L538 7JUG 7JUG B720 B720 B720 B720
307 Metered Parking A865 A865 A865 A865 X460 B127 B127 B127 B127 G080 G080 R671
308 Metered Parking F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F308 F211 F211 F211 8732 8732 8732
309 Metered Parking 6675 6675 6675 6675 6675 6675 6675 6675 Y804 Y804 Y804 Y804
310 Metered Parking V114 V114 V114 Y134 Y134 T717 T717 T717 86P1 86P1 709A 709A 709A 7776 7776
311 Metered Parking U630 U630 U630 U630 U630 E070 E070 E070 E070 E070 N603 N603 N960 N960
312 Metered Parking NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE J512 J512 J512 2191 2191 2191 2191
313 Metered Parking K017 K017 K017 K017 K017 K017 L718 L718 X659 X659 X659 R117 NO PLATE
314 Metered Parking K247 K247 K247 K247 K247 K247 23G0 23G0 23G0 L799 L799 L799 Y405
315 Metered Parking K085 K085 K085 K085 K085 K085 K085 5207 5207 5207 5207 J359 J359 A863
316 Metered Parking Z888 Z888 Z888 Z259 HYV8 HYV8 HYV8 D041 D041 D041 D041 D041 F570 F570 A704
317 Metered Parking P735 P735 P735 P735 P735 R767 U982 U982 U982 G405 G405 G405
318 Metered Parking F812 J046 J046 J046 J046 J046 J046 L217 L217 H119 H119 G433 G433
319 Metered Parking XY04 XY04 XY04 D275 D275 D275 D275 D275 D275 F354 F354 U228 U228 P126 X819 X819 X819 X819
320 Metered Parking F890 F890 F890 F890 F890 F890 F890 7822 7822 7822 R217 R217 A847 A847
321 Metered Parking Z067 T134 T134 T134 T134 T134 T134 F828 F828 Y247 Y247 R834 R834
322 Metered Parking J546 J546 J546 J546 J546 J546 J546 D587 D587 D587 D587 X368
323 Metered Parking Z921 Z921 Z921 V049 V049 V049 V049 V049 H165 5539 S539 S539 S539 S539 S539 E460 E460 E460
324 Metered Parking R115 R115 D328 D328 D328 D328 D328 L271 L271 S222 S222 S222 S222 S222
325 Metered Parking E263 E263 M938 M938 M938 M938 L664 L664 L664 L582 L582 L582 L582 L582 L582
326 Metered Parking A829 A191 A191 A191 A191 A191 A191 A191 A191 T811 T811 T811
327 Metered Parking P829 P829 P829 P829 P829 P829 P829 U907 U907 U907 U907 H324 H324 H324 H324
328 Metered Parking 80C1 E135 E135 E135 E135 E135 93X1 93X1 93X1 X474 T679 T679 T679
329 Metered Parking 7192 7192 7192 7192 7192 A286 G085 G085 W215 W215 E415 T515 T515 T515 T515
330 Metered Parking V325 V325 V325 XY04 XY04 XY04 XY04 B245 B245 B119 B119 U315 U315 U315 C139 C139 C139 C139
331 Metered Parking 79E1 79E1 79E1 79E1 79E1 B579 B579 B579 B579 W899 W899 W899
332 Metered Parking Z067 Z067 Z067 Z067 Z067 Y972 Y972 Y972 A043 A043 M651 M651 M651 M651 M651
333 Metered Parking B827 B827 B827 B827 B827 B827 B827 S224 S224 S224 S224
334 Metered Parking R279 R279 R279 R279 R279 R279 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE M202 M202 J811 J811 J811 J811
335 Metered Parking R115 R115 R115 R115 R115 R115 R115 R948 R948 L692 L692 L692 T151
336 Metered Parking A489 A489 A489 6528 6528 6528 6528 6528 6528 6528 NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE E917 NRSR NRSR NRSR
337 Metered Parking A829 A829 A829 A829 A829 A829 A534 A534 A534 A534 A534 A534 Z803 Z803 B602
338 Metered Parking K346 K346 K346 K346 K346 M339 M339 M339 M339 M339 M339 M339 M339 M339 M339
339 Metered Parking 80C1 80C1 80C1 80C1 80C1 80C1 80C1 W349 W349 W349 G779 G779 M188
340 Metered Parking H805 H805 H805 R824 R824 R824 R824 R824 R824 T703 T703 D549 D549 D549 P009 P009 P009 Y372
341 Metered Parking E581 E581 E581 E581 E581 E581 E581 50FR 50FR 50FR 50FR 50FR H476
342 Metered Parking V607 V607 V607 S936 S936 S936 S936 S936 10J0 10J0 7504 7504 7504 7504 7504 7504 7504 7504
343 Metered Parking 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 2054 Z027
344 Metered Parking F838 G205 G205 G205 G205 G205 G205 G205 G205 G205 G205 G205 G205 A799 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016 LOCATION: PARKING LOT C
Space Type 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 1200-100 100-200 200-300 300-400 400-500 500-600 600-700 700-800 800-900 900-1000 1000-1100 1100-1200 No. 345 Metered Parking 68R0 68R0 68R0 JMZ JMZ JMZ JMZ JMZ JMZ JMZ JMZ E935 E935 K372 K372 H632 H632
346 Metered Parking R925 U716 U716 U716 U716 U716 U716 WT15 WT15 X164 X164 X164 B925 B925 NO PLATE
347 Metered Parking N644 N644 9706 9706 9706 9706 9706 9706 9706 9706 N393 N393 N393 N780 N780 N780 N780
348 Metered Parking B403 B403 B403 B403 U968 Z312 Z312 G742 N379 N379 N379 N379 N379 N379
349 Metered Parking U625 U625 U625 U625 U625 NO PLATE NO PLATE 5527 K513 K513 K513 F076 F076 F076
350 Metered Parking V910 V910 V910 V910 P551 P551 P551 Z314 Z314 Z314 Z314 P613 P613 U291
351 Metered Parking 7948 7948 7948 7948 L940 L940 L940 L940 O152 O152 O152 M841 M841 M841
352 Metered Parking V442 V442 V442 V442 V442 V442 V442 5053 5053 5869 5869 5869 C709 C709
353 Metered Parking V607 V607 V607 V607 T694 T694 T694 T694 T694 T694 T694 N265 N265 R112
354 Metered Parking M163 M163 M163 M163 Y701 Y701 Y701 B176 B176 B176 B176 B176 B176 B176
355 Metered Parking 326C 326C 326C 326C 326C 326C J859 J859 J859 R312 R312 NO PLATE NO PLATE
356 Metered Parking NO PLATE NO PLATE NO PLATE X472 X472 N740 N740 C560 C560 C560 C560 5777 5777 5777
357 Metered Parking E018 E018 E018 E018 CED CED CED X543 X543 X543 X543 G687 G687 H340
358 Metered Parking P304 P304 P304 P304 P304 P304 P304 V169 E561 E561 8NRG U267 U267 V067
Appendix A5 Shade Hotel Manhattan Beach Parking Survey
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Parking Study Locations: 1221 N Valley Dr Day: Saturday City: Manhattan Beach Date: 9/17/2016
Shade Hotel Valet Parking TIME Grand Total Regular Compact EV City Vehicle Spaces 28 3* 1 1 30 06:00 AM 23 1 1 1 26 07:00 AM 23 1 1 1 26 08:00 AM 22 1 1 1 25 09:00 AM 18 1 1 1 21 10:00 AM 14 1 1 1 17 11:00 AM 14 0 1 1 16 12:00 PM 17 0 1 1 19 01:00 PM 22 0 1 1 24 02:00 PM 18 0 1 1 20 03:00 PM 21 0 1 1 23 04:00 PM 23 0 1 1 25 05:00 PM 22 0 1 1 24 06:00 PM 21 0 1 1 23 07:00 PM 18 0 1 1 20 08:00 PM 21 0 1 1 23 09:00 PM 22 0 1 1 24 10:00 PM 22 0 1 1 24 11:00 PM 21 0 1 1 23 12:00 AM 19 0 1 1 21
Notes : * 2 of the 3 compact spots were used for storage Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Parking Study Locations: 1221 N Valley Dr Day: Tuesday City: Manhattan Beach Date: 9/20/2016
Shade Hotel Valet Parking TIME Grand Total Regular Compact EV City Vehicle Spaces 28 3* 1 1 30 06:00 AM 13 0 1 1 15 07:00 AM 13 0 1 1 15 08:00 AM 13 0 1 1 15 09:00 AM 21 0 1 1 23 10:00 AM 20 0 1 1 22 11:00 AM 18 0 1 0 19 12:00 PM 20 0 1 0 21 01:00 PM 22 1 1 1 25 02:00 PM 19 1 1 1 22 03:00 PM 21 0 1 1 23 04:00 PM 19 0 1 1 21 05:00 PM 15 1 1 1 18 06:00 PM 11 1 1 1 14 07:00 PM 13 1 1 1 16 08:00 PM 11 1 1 1 14 09:00 PM 10 1 1 1 13 10:00 PM 11 1 1 1 14 11:00 PM 11 1 1 1 14 12:00 AM 11 1 1 1 14
Notes : * 2 of the 3 compact spots were used for storage
Appendix A6 Shade Hotel Redondo Beach Parking Survey
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Parking Study
Location: 655 N Harbor Dr Day: Tuesday City: Redondo Beach Date: 11/1/2016
Shade Hotel (655 N Harbor Dr, Redondo Beach) LOT 1 LOT 2 Time HOTEL/VALET HC Illegal Unmarked HC HOTEL/VALET Grand Total EMPLOYEE Valet Tags No Tags HC Illegal CLEAN AIR EV PARKING Motorcycle Tag No Tag HC Illegal Valet Tags No Tags PARKING
Spaces33 6 1121 25330 111
6:00 AM 8200700000000017
7:00 AM 10200700000000019
8:00 AM 8100400000000013
9:00 AM 7100300000000011
10:00 AM 9310200000000015
11:00 AM 12310300000000019
12:00 PM 12320200000000019
1:00 PM 11210100000000015
2:00 PM 9110300000000014
3:00 PM 6200400000000012
4:00 PM 5200300000000010
5:00 PM 6200400000000012
6:00 PM 14100400000000019
7:00 PM 11100400000000016
8:00 PM 12110500000000019
9:00 PM 11110400000000017
10:00 PM 10110400000000016
11:00 PM 11010400000000016
12:00 AM 10000400000000014
Notes: The entire Lot 1 is valet parking. Lot 2 is employee parking and not used by the valet.
Lot 1 ‐ Occupancy Study
25
20
15
10
5
0 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AM
Hotel Valet‐ Tags Hotel/Valet ‐ No Tags HC HC Illegal Clean Air EV‐Parking Motorcycles Illegal‐Tag Illegal‐NoTags Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Parking Study
Location: 655 N Harbor Dr Day: Saturday City: Redondo Beach Date: 11/5/2016
Shade Hotel (655 N Harbor Dr, Redondo Beach) LOT 1 LOT 2 Time HOTEL/VALET HC Illegal Unmarked HC HOTEL/VALET Grand Total EMPLOYEE Valet Tags No Tags HC Illegal CLEAN AIR EV PARKING Motorcycle Tag No Tag HC Illegal Valet Tags No Tags PARKING
Spaces33 6 1121 253 30 111 6:00 AM 2143011110000000 41 7:00 AM 193309010000000 35 8:00 AM 193208010000000 33 9:00 AM 143109010000000 28 10:00 AM 113105010000000 21 11:00 AM 61009010000000 17 12:00 PM 1041011010000000 27 1:00 PM 93107010000000 21 2:00 PM 74003010000000 15 3:00 PM 95009010000000 24 4:00 PM 871011010100000 29 5:00 PM 138009010000000 31 6:00 PM 148009110200000 35 7:00 PM 2193010210100000 47 8:00 PM 2396011212100000 55 9:00 PM 19126011203100000 54 10:00 PM 1575010203000000 42 11:00 PM 9123110101100000 38
12:00 AM 1312311010020000042
Notes: The entire Lot 1 is valet parking. Lot 2 is employee parking and not used by the valet.
Lot 2 ‐ Occupancy Study 25
20
15
10
5
0 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM11:00 PM12:00 AM
Hotel Valet‐Tags Hotel/Valet ‐ No Tags HC HC Illegal Clean Air EV‐Parking Motorcycles Illegal‐Tag Illegal‐NoTags
APPENDIX B ON-STREET PARKING UTILIZATION DATA SHEETS
Appendix B1 Weekday On-Street Parking Survey
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING OCCUPANCY STUDY HERMOSA PARKING OCCUPANCY STUDY TRAVEL SEGMENT STREET FROM TO SIDE DATE LIMIT CURB TYPE RESTRICTIONS #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### DIRECTION INVENTORY No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 10 AM | 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes 001 Hermosa Ave 15th St 14th St East NB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 8 6738888887687785557 Applicable | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes Applicable | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight 001 Hermosa Ave 15th St 14th St West NB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 1 1111111111111111111 Everyday 001 Hermosa Ave 15th St 14th St West NB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 8 7857768876775565336 24 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 10 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicle Shall Vacate Space At 001 Hermosa Ave 15th St 14th St East SB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 2 2211211211120011001 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 10 AM | 24 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM To 001 Hermosa Ave 15th St 14th St East SB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 6 4554566666465565545 Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 10 AM | 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes 001 Hermosa Ave 15th St 14th St East SB 08/31/16 Normal 1 0000111111111111111 Applicable | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Monday 8 AM To 10 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicle Space Of Expiration 001 Hermosa Ave 15th St 14th St West SB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 8 4435345821255854100 Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Monday 6 AM to 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight 002 Hermosa Ave 14th St 13th St East NB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 5 5555555534545554001 Everyday | Taxi Zone Thurs - Mon 9 PM to 3 AM Begin No Parking Monday 6 AM to 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 002 Hermosa Ave 14th St 13th St East NB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 4 4444444444444442210 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Everyday 002 Hermosa Ave 14th St 13th St East NB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 No Parking Monday 6 AM to 7 AM | 15 Minute Parking Only | No Taxi Parking No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 AM | 15 Minute Parking Only | No Taxi Parking | 002 Hermosa Ave 14th St 13th St West SB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 1 0101000110000001000 Compact Cars Only No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 002 Hermosa Ave 14th St 13th St West SB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 4 4434424431244440000 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday 002 Hermosa Ave 14th St 13th St West SB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 AM | 15 Minute Parking Only | No Taxi Parking No Parking Monday 6 AM to 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 003 Hermosa Ave 13th St Pier Ave East NB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 8 8778887776888774644 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 003 Hermosa Ave 13th St Pier Ave West SB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 5 5335555554455553334 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday 003 Hermosa Ave 13th St Pier Ave West SB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 AM | 15 Minute Parking Only | No Taxi Parking No Parking Monday 6 AM to 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 004 Hermosa Ave Pier Ave 11th St East NB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 6 2555435646656662121 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday 004 Hermosa Ave Pier Ave 11th St East NB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 1 3 0 1 2 2 4 0 0 0 1 No Parking Monday 6 AM to 7 AM | 15 Minute Parking Only | No Taxi Parking No Parking 6 AM to 7 AM Daily | 15 Minute Parking Only | Except Taxi Parking 004 Hermosa Ave Pier Ave 11th St West SB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 2 0001101210212221001 Thursday - Monday 9 PM to 3 AM No Parking 6 AM to 7 AM Daily | 3 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight 004 Hermosa Ave Pier Ave 11th St West SB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 3 0222233322222330011 Everyday No Parking 6 AM to 7 AM Daily | Taxi Parking Only | Taxi Zone Thur - Mon 9 PM to 3 004 Hermosa Ave Pier Ave 11th St West SB 08/31/16 White Curb 7 0011010021011363456 AM No Parking Monday 6 AM To 7 AM | Passenger Loading And Unloading Only | During 005 Hermosa Ave 11th St 10th St East NB 08/31/16 5 Minute White Curb 2 0000001000000020000 Business Hours Only No Parking Monday 6 AM To 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 005 Hermosa Ave 11th St 10th St East NB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 8 4576565686585665644 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 005 Hermosa Ave 11th St 10th St West SB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 2 1122122112212221110 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 AM | Loading Zone 7 AM to 6 PM Monday Thru 005 Hermosa Ave 11th St 10th St West SB 08/31/16 Yellow Curb 1 0101010000001111000 Saturday No Parking Monday 8 AM To 12 Noon | 3 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to 006 Manhattan Ave 14th St Pier Ave East NB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 3 1233322122230332100 Midnight Daily No Parking Tuesday 10 AM To 2 PM | 3 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight 006 Manhattan Ave 14th St Pier Ave West SB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter/Taxi Zone 5 0133533332245551000 Daily | Taxi Zone | Taxi Zone Thurs - Mon 9 AM to 3 AM No Parking Tuesday 10 AM To 2 PM | 24 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight 006 Manhattan Ave 14th St Pier Ave West SB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 5 3225555344435544444 Daily 007 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave 10th St East NB 08/31/16 1 Hour Normal 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 10 11 11 11 No Parking Thursday 10 AM to 2 PM No Parking Wednesday 8 AM to 12 Noon | 2 Hour Parking | 10 AM to Midnight | No 007 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave 10th St West SB 08/31/16 2 Hour Normal 3 1103231332333132231 Permit Parking No Parking Wednesday 8 AM to 12 Noon | 1 Hour parking | 10 AM to Midnight | 007 Manhattan Ave Pier Ave 10th St West SB 08/31/16 1 Hour Normal 14 11 6 6 6 8 12 13 13 14 14 12 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Except Residents or Day Permits No Parking Monday 8 AM To 12 Noon | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space 008 15th St Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 2 1001122111212100111 At Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Monday 8 AM To 12 Noon | 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes 008 15th St Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 7 5555675664676777766 Applicable | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 12 Noon | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space 008 15th St Beach Dr Hermosa Ave South EB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 3 0022220000100101000 At Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 12 Noon | 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes 008 15th St Beach Dr Hermosa Ave South EB 08/31/16 12 Hour Meter 6 6665666656666666655 Applicable 008 15th St Beach Dr Hermosa Ave South EB 08/31/16 Blue Curb 1 1000000011111111100 No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 12 Noon | Reserved For Disabled No Parking Monday 8 AM To 10 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space 009 14th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 11 2 7 7 10 8 10 11 11 11 7 7 11 7 11 9 5 3 2 0 At Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday 009 14th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 No Parking Monday 8 AM To 10 AM | 15 Minute Parking Only | No Taxi Parking 009 14th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 White Curb 1 0000000010000000000 No Parking Monday 8 AM To 10 AM | Passenger Loading And Unloading No Parking Monday 8 AM To 10 AM | 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes 009 14th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 1 1111111111111100000 Applicable | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 10 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space 009 14th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave South EB 08/31/16 12 Hour Meter 8 1423558884677763332 At Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 10 AM | 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes 009 14th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave South EB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 5 2110355555555554332 Applicable | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday 010 14th Hermosa Ave Palm Dr North WB 08/31/16 Red 0 0000000000000000000 Tow Away No Parking Any Time No Parking Tuesday 10 AM To 2 PM | 3 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight 010 14th Hermosa Ave Palm Dr South EB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 3 1233333313323233201 Daily 011 14th Palm Dr Manhattan Ave North WB 08/31/16 Red 0 0000000000000000000 Tow Away No Parking Any Time No Parking Tuesday 10 AM To 2 PM | 3 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight 011 14th Palm Dr Manhattan Ave South EB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 3 3233333233332333333 Daily Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services HERMOSA PARKING OCCUPANCY STUDY HERMOSA PARKING OCCUPANCY STUDY TRAVEL SEGMENT STREET FROM TO SIDE DATE LIMIT CURB TYPE RESTRICTIONS #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### #### DIRECTION INVENTORY No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6 AM To 6:30 AM | 15 012 Pier Ave Hermosa Ave Palm Dr North WB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 1 0001011001101100111 Minute Parking Only Daily No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6 AM To 6:30 AM | 3 Hour 012 Pier Ave Hermosa Ave Palm Dr North WB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 3 3132323223333323333 Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Daily No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6 AM To 6:30 AM | 3 Hour 012 Pier Ave Hermosa Ave Palm Dr North WB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 4 0000000000122222101 Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Daily | Motorcycle Parking Only 1 Motorcycle Per Stall No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6:30 AM To 7 AM | 15 012 Pier Ave Hermosa Ave Palm Dr South EB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 1 0001111111110010111 Minute Parking Only Daily No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6:30 AM To 7 AM | 3 Hour 012 Pier Ave Hermosa Ave Palm Dr South EB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 2 2102222222222221122 Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Daily 012 Pier Ave Hermosa Ave Palm Dr South EB 08/31/16 Meter 1 0000000001010000000 No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6:30 AM To 7 AM 013 Pier Ave Palm Dr Manhattan Ave (S) North WB 08/31/16 Normal 0 0000000000000000000 No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6:30 AM To 7 AM | 3 Hour 013 Pier Ave Palm Dr Manhattan Ave (S) South EB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 6 0346565456355644422 Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Daily No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6:00 AM to 6:30 AM | 15 014 Pier Ave Manhattan Ave (S) Manhattan Ave (N) North WB 08/31/16 15 Minute Green Curb 2 0122021220201210000 Minute Parking Only Daily No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6:00 AM to 6:30 AM | 3 014 Pier Ave Manhattan Ave (S) Manhattan Ave (N) North WB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 8 5588687867688774555 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Daily No Parking Monday/Wednesday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday 6:30 AM To 7 AM | 3 Hour 014 Pier Ave Manhattan Ave (S) Manhattan Ave (N) South EB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 5 1253254522232250111 Parking | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Daily 015 11th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 Normal 0 0000000000000000000 No Parking Anytime No Parking Tuesday 6 AM To 7 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 015 11th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave South EB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 27 23 21 27 27 20 25 26 22 22 20 19 24 27 26 25 22 15 18 17 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Everyday No Parking Monday 7 AM To 9 AM | 3 Hour Parking | Vehicles Shall Vacate Space At 016 10th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 1 1111111111111111011 Expiration Of 3 Hour Limit | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Monday 7 AM To 9 AM | 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes 016 10th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave North WB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 6 6566666666666666666 Applicable | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 12 Noon | 24 Hour Parking | Resident Parking Passes 016 10th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave South EB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 7 7777777767767767777 Applicable | Enforced 10 AM To Midnight Everyday 016 10th Beach Dr Hermosa Ave South EB 08/31/16 Blue Curb 2 1111112111112211111 No Parking Tuesday 8 AM To 12 Noon | Handicap Parking Only No Parking Wednesday 8 AM to 12 NOON | 3 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to 017 10th Hermosa Ave Palm Dr North WB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 3 2111101233333333133 Midnight Everyday No Parking Thursday 10 AM to 2 PM | 24 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to 017 10th Hermosa Ave Palm Dr South EB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 4 4344444444444444444 Midnight Everyday No Parking Wednesday 8 AM to 12 NOON | 24 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to 018 10th Palm Dr Manhattan Ave North WB 08/31/16 3 Hour Meter 3 1000013332333333333 Midnight Everyday No Parking Thursday 10 AM to 2 PM | 24 Hour Parking | Enforced 10 AM to 018 10th Palm Dr Manhattan Ave South EB 08/31/16 24 Hour Meter 4 4434444444444444444 Midnight Everyday
Appendix B2 Weekend On-Street Parking Survey
WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE FROM / TO 15TH TO 14TH 15TH TO 14TH 15TH TO 14TH 15TH TO 14TH SIDE WEST SIDE OF SB LANES EAST SIDE OF SB LANES (Parking in median) WEST SIDE OF NB LANES (Parking in median) EAST SIDE OF NB LANES Space Type METER METER TOTAL METER METER TOTAL METER TOTAL METER TOTAL Space Inventory 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 24 Hour Parking - 3 Hour Parking - 24 Hour Parking - 3 Hour Parking - 24 Hour Parking - 24 Hour Parking - Resident Parking Vehicles shal Resident Parking Vehicles shall Resident Parking Resident Parking Passes Applicable vacate space at Passes Applicable vacate space at Passes Applicable Passes Applicable - Enforced 10 AM - expiration of 3 - Enforced 10 AM - expiration of 3 - Enforced 10 AM - - Enforced 10 AM - Midnight Everyday hour limit - Midnight Everyday hour limit - Midnight Everyday Midnight Everyday Restrictions - No Parking Enforced 10 AM to - No Parking Enforced 10 am to - No Parking - No Parking Monday 8 AM to Midnight Everyday Tuesday 8 AM to Midnight Everyday Tuesday 8 AM to Tuesday 8 AM to 10 AM - No Parking 10 AM - No Parking 10 AM 10 AM Monday 8 AM to Tuesday 8 AM to 10AM 10 AM 600-700 5 1 6 1 1 2 8 8 8 8 700-800 5 1 6 1 1 2 7 7 8 8 800-900 7 2 9 2 3 5 8 8 9 9 900-1000 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 1000-1100 6 1 7 2 4 6 8 8 9 9 1100-1200 7 2 9 2 4 6 8 8 8 8 1200-100 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 100-200 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 200-300 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 300-400 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 400-500 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 500-600 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 600-700 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 700-800 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 800-900 7 2 9 2 6 8 8 8 9 9 900-1000 7 2 9 2 6 8 7 7 8 8 1000-1100 7 2 9 2 7 9 8 8 9 9 1100-1200 7 0 7 2 8 10 8 8 9 9
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE FROM / TO 14TH TO 13TH 14TH TO 13TH SIDE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Space Type METER GREEN CURB TOTAL GREEN CURB METER TOTAL Space Inventory 4 2 6 2 9 11 3 Hour Parking - 15 minute parking 15 minutes only 3 Hour Parking - Vehicles shal only - No Taxi daily - No Parking Vehicles shal vacate space at Parking - No Monday 6 AM to 7 vacate space at expiration of 3 Parking Tuesday 6 AM expiration of 3 hour limit - AM to 7 AM hour limit - Restrictions Enforced 10 AM to Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Everyday - Midnight Everyday - No Parking No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 Monday 6 AM to 7 AM AM 600-700 1 0 1 0 3 3 700-800 4 1 5 1 5 6 800-900 4 0 4 0 9 9 900-1000 4 2 6 1 8 9 1000-1100 2 2 4 1 9 10 1100-1200 4 1 5 1 8 9 1200-100 4 1 5 2 9 11 100-200 3 0 3 0 9 9 200-300 4 1 5 2 9 11 300-400 4 1 5 2 9 11 400-500 4 1 5 2 9 11 500-600 4 1 5 1 9 10 600-700 4 1 5 1 9 10 700-800 4 0 4 2 9 11 800-900 4 1 5 2 9 11 900-1000 4 1 5 2 8 10 1000-1100 1 0 1 1 7 8 1100-1200 2 0 2 1 7 8
Notes: The 5 spaces closest to 14th Street on the North Side also signed "Taxi Zone Thur to Mon 9 PM to 3 AM" WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE FROM / TO 13TH TO PIER 13TH TO PIER SIDE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Space Type METER GREEN CURB TOTAL METER TOTAL Space Inventory 5 2 7 8 8 3 Hour Parking - 15 minute parking Illegal 3 Hour Parking - Vehicles shal only - except taxi Vehicles shall vacate space at parking Thursday vacate space at expiration of 3 to Monday 9 PM to expiration of 3 hour limit - 3 AM - No Parking hour limit - Restrictions Enforced 10 AM to Tuesday 6 AM to 7 Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Everyday - AM Midnight Everyday No Parking - No Parking Monday 8 AM to Monday 6 AM to 7 10AM AM 600-700 2 0 0 2 0 0 700-800 5 1 0 6 7 7 800-900 5 1 0 6 7 7 900-1000 5 1 0 6 8 8 1000-1100 3 2 0 5 8 8 1100-1200 5 2 0 7 8 8 1200-100 5 2 0 7 8 8 100-200 5 2 0 7 8 8 200-300 5 0 0 5 8 8 300-400 5 1 0 6 8 8 400-500 5 2 0 7 8 8 500-600 5 0 0 5 8 8 600-700 5 2 0 7 8 8 700-800 5 2 1 8 8 8 800-900 5 2 0 7 8 8 900-1000 4 2 0 6 7 7 1000-1100 5 2 0 7 7 7 1100-1200 3 1 0 4 8 8
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE FROM / TO PIER TO 11TH PIER TO 11TH SIDE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Space Type GREEN CURB METER WHITE CURB TOTAL METER GREEN CURB TOTAL Space Inventory 2 3 5 10 6 2 8 15 minute parking 3 Hour Parking - Taxi Parking Only - 3 Hour Parking - 15 Minute Parking only - Except taxi Vehicles shal No Parking Vehicles shal Only - No Taxi parking Thursday vacate space at Tuesday 6 AM to 7 vacate space at parking - No to Monday 9 PM to expiration of 3 AM expiration of 3 Parking Monday 6 3 AM - No Parking hour limit - hour limit - AM to 7 AM Restrictions Tuesday 6 AM to 7 Enforced 10 AM to Enforced 10 AM to AM Midnight Everyday - Midnight Everyday - No Parking No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7 Monday 6 AM to 7 AM AM 600-700 0 1 1 2 2 0 2 700-800 0 2 2 4 3 0 3 800-900 0 3 1 4 6 1 7 900-1000 0 2 2 4 3 0 3 1000-1100 1 3 1 5 5 0 5 1100-1200 0 3 0 3 5 0 5 1200-100 1 1 0 2 6 2 8 100-200 0 3 2 5 6 2 8 200-300 0 3 2 5 6 2 8 300-400 2 3 4 9 5 2 7 400-500 2 3 2 7 6 2 8 500-600 2 3 4 9 5 2 7 600-700 2 3 3 8 6 1 7 700-800 2 3 6 11 6 1 7 800-900 2 3 5 10 6 2 8 900-1000 1 0 7 8 5 0 5 1000-1100 0 3 6 9 5 0 5 1100-1200 0 3 6 9 6 2 8
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: HERMOSA AVENUE HERMOSA AVENUE FROM / TO 11TH TO 10TH 11TH TO 10TH SIDE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Space Type YELLOW CURB METER TOTAL WHILTE CURB METER GREEN CURB TOTAL Space Inventory 1 2 3 1 8 2 11 Loading Zone 7 3 Hour Parking - 3 Hour Parking - 15 Min AM to 6 PM Vehicles shal Vehicles shal Monday to vacate space at vacate space at Saturday - No expiration of 3 expiration of 3 Parking Tuesday 6 hour limit - hour limit - Restrictions AM to 7 AM Enforced 10 AM to Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Everyday - Midnight Everyday - No Parking No Parking Monday 8 AM to Monday 6 AM to 7 10AM AM 600-700 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 700-800 0 2 2 0 4 0 4 800-900 0 2 2 0 7 0 7 900-1000 0 2 2 0 4 0 4 1000-1100 0 2 2 0 6 0 6 1100-1200 1 2 3 0 8 1 9 1200-100 1 2 3 1 8 1 10 100-200 1 2 3 0 8 1 9 200-300 1 2 3 0 8 1 9 300-400 1 2 3 0 8 2 10 400-500 1 2 3 0 8 1 9 500-600 1 2 3 0 8 1 9 600-700 1 2 3 0 8 1 9 700-800 1 2 3 1 8 1 10 800-900 1 2 3 0 8 1 9 900-1000 1 2 3 1 8 2 11 1000-1100 0 2 2 0 8 0 8 1100-1200 1 2 3 0 8 1 9
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: 15TH 15TH FROM / TO HERMOSA TO END HERMOSA TO END SIDE NORTH SOUTH Space Type METER METER TOTAL METER METER HANDICAPPED TOTAL Space Inventory 7 2 9 6 3 2 11 24 Hour Parking - 3 Hour Parking - Illegally Parked 24 Hour Parking - 3 Hour Parking - Resident Parking Vehicles shal Resident Parking Vehicles shal Passes Applicable - vacate space at Passes Applicable - vacate space at Enforced 10 AM - expiration of 3 Enforced 10 AM - expiration of 3 Midnight Everyday - hour limit - Midnight Everyday - hour limit - Restrictions No Parking Enforced 10 AM to No Parking Enforced 10 AM to Monday 8 AM to Midnight Everyday - Tuesday 8 AM to Midnight Everyday - 12 Noon No Parking 12 Noon No Parking Monday 8 AM to Tuesday 8 AM to 12 Noon 12 Noon 600-700 7 1 1 9 4 2 2 8
700-800 7 1 1 9 5 1 2 8
800-900 7 2 1 10 6 1 1 8 900-1000 7 1 1 9 6 1 1 8 1000-1100 7 1 1 9 5 0 1 6
1100-1200 7 2 1 10 5 0 1 6 1200-100 7 2 1 10 5 2 2 9 100-200 6 2 1 9 6 0 2 8 200-300 6 2 1 9 6 0 2 8 300-400 7 2 1 10 6 0 2 8 400-500 7 2 1 10 6 0 2 8 500-600 7 2 1 10 6 3 2 11 600-700 7 2 0 9 6 3 1 10 700-800 7 2 0 9 6 3 1 10 800-900 7 2 0 9 6 3 1 10 900-1000 7 2 0 9 6 2 1 9 1000-1100 7 1 0 8 6 2 1 9 1100-1200 7 1 0 8 5 0 1 6
Notes: The three 3-hour spaces and one of the 24-hour spaces on the south side were posted "Temporary No Parking." WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: 14TH STREET HERMOSA AVENUE FROM / TO HERMOSA TO END 15TH TO 14TH SIDE NORTH SIDE SOUTH SIDE Space Type METER METER Green Curb TOTAL METER METER TOTAL Space Inventory 1 10 1 12 6 8 14 24 Hour Parking - 3 Hour Parking - 15 Mins 24 Hour Parking - 3 Hour Parking - Resident Parking Vehicles shal Resident Parking Vehicles shal Passes Applicable - vacate space at Passes Applicable - vacate space at Enforced 10 AM - expiration of 3 Enforced 10 AM - expiration of 3 Midnight Everyday - hour limit - Midnight Everyday - hour limit - Restrictions No Parking Enforced 10 AM to No Parking Enforced 10 AM to Monday 8 AM to Midnight Everyday - Tuesday 8 AM to Midnight Everyday - 10 AM No Parking 10 AM No Parking Monday 8 AM to Tuesday 8 AM to 10AM 10AM 600-700 1 8 0 9 5 2 7 700-800 1 7 0 8 5 4 9 800-900 1 10 1 12 6 7 13 900-1000 1 10 0 11 6 7 13 1000-1100 1 9 1 11 5 7 12 1100-1200 1 10 0 11 5 7 12 1200-100 1 10 0 11 5 8 13 100-200 1 10 1 12 5 8 13 200-300 1 10 1 12 5 8 13 300-400 1 10 1 12 6 8 14 400-500 1 10 1 12 6 8 14 500-600 1 9 1 11 6 8 14 600-700 1 10 1 12 6 8 14 700-800 1 10 0 11 6 8 14 800-900 1 10 0 11 6 8 14 900-1000 1 9 1 11 6 7 13 1000-1100 1 9 0 10 6 7 13 1100-1200 1 6 0 7 8 5 13
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: 14TH STREET 14TH FROM / TO HERMOSA TO MANHATTAN HERMOSA TO MANHATTAN SIDE NORTH SIDE SOUTH SIDE Space Type TOTAL METER METER TOTAL Space Inventory 0 3 3 6 24 Hours Parking - 3 Hours Parking - Enforced 10 AM to Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Daily - Midnight Daily - Restrictions No Parking No Parking Tuesday 10 AM to Tuesday 10 AM to 2 PM 2 PM 600-700 0 0 0 0 700-800 0 0 2 2 800-900 0 0 3 3 900-1000 0 3 3 6 1000-1100 0 3 3 6 1100-1200 0 3 3 6 1200-100 0 3 3 6 100-200 0 3 3 6 200-300 0 3 3 6 300-400 0 3 3 6 400-500 0 3 3 6 500-600 0 3 3 6 600-700 0 3 3 6 700-800 0 3 3 6 800-900 0 3 3 6 900-1000 0 3 2 5 1000-1100 0 2 3 5 1100-1200 0 3 3 6
Notes: No parking on north side of street WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: 11TH STREET 11TH STREET FROM / TO HERMOSA TO END HERMOSA TO END SIDE NORTH SIDE SOUTH SIDE Space Type TOTAL METER TOTAL Space Inventory 0 27 27 3 Hour Parking - Illegal Vehicles shal vacate space at expiration of 3 hour limit - Restrictions Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Everyday - No Parking Tuesday 6 AM to 7AM 600-700 0 24 0 24 700-800 0 27 0 27 800-900 0 26 0 26 900-1000 0 19 0 19 1000-1100 0 25 0 25 1100-1200 0 27 0 27 1200-100 0 27 0 27 100-200 0 27 0 27 200-300 0 27 0 27 300-400 0 27 0 27 400-500 0 27 0 27 500-600 0 27 0 27 600-700 0 26 0 26 700-800 0 27 1 28 800-900 0 27 0 27 900-1000 0 27 0 27 1000-1100 0 25 0 25 1100-1200 0 27 0 27
Notes: North side parking part of Parking Lot A WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: 10TH STREET 10TH STREET FROM / TO HERMOSA TO END HERMOSA TO END SIDE NORTH SIDE SOUTH SIDE Space Type METER METER TOTAL METER HANDICAPPED TOTAL Space Inventory 6 1 7 7 2 9 24 Hour Parking - 3 Hour Parking - Illegal 24 Hour Parking - Handicapped - No Illegal Resident Parking Vehicles shal Resident Parking Parking Tuesday 8 Passes Applicable - vacate space at Passes Applicable - AM to 12 Noon Enforced 10 AM - expiration of 3 Enforced 10 AM - Midnight Everyday - hour limit - Midnight Everyday - Restrictions No Parking Enforced 10 AM to No Parking Monday 7 AM to 9 Midnight Everyday - Tuesday 8 AM to AM No Parking 12 Noon Monday 7 AM to 9 AM 600-700 6 0 1 7 7 2 1 10
700-800 6 0 1 7 7 2 1 10
800-900 6 0 1 7 7 2 1 10 900-1000 6 0 1 7 7 2 1 10 1000-1100 6 1 0 7 7 2 0 9
1100-1200 6 1 0 7 7 2 0 9 1200-100 6 1 0 7 7 2 0 9 100-200 6 1 2 9 7 2 0 9 200-300 6 1 1 8 7 2 0 9 300-400 6 1 1 8 7 2 0 9 400-500 6 1 1 8 7 2 0 9 500-600 6 1 1 8 7 2 0 9 600-700 6 1 1 8 7 2 0 9 700-800 6 1 1 8 7 2 0 9 800-900 6 1 1 8 7 2 2 11 900-1000 6 1 1 8 7 2 2 11 1000-1100 6 1 1 8 7 2 0 9 1100-1200 6 1 1 8 7 2 2 11
Notes: Cars noted at illegal were parked in front of driveways WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: 10TH STREET 10TH STREET FROM / TO HERMOSA TO MANHATTAN HERMOSA TO MANHATTAN SIDE NORTH SIDE SOUTH SIDE Space Type METER METER TOTAL METER TOTAL Space Inventory 3 3 6 8 8 3 Hour Parking - 24 Hour Parking - Illegal 24 Hour Parking - Vehicles shall Enforced 10 AM to Enforced 10 AM - vacate space at Midnight Daily - No Midnight Everyday - expiration of 3 Parking No Parking hour limit - Enforce Wednesday 8 AM Thursday 10 AM to Restrictions 10 AM to Midngith to 12 Noon 2 PM Everyday - No Parking Wednesday 8 AM to 12 Noon
600-700 1 2 0 3 7 7 700-800 1 2 0 3 7 7 800-900 0 3 0 3 6 6 900-1000 2 3 0 5 6 6 1000-1100 3 3 0 6 8 8 1100-1200 3 3 0 6 8 8 1200-100 2 3 1 6 8 8 100-200 3 3 0 6 8 8 200-300 3 3 0 6 8 8 300-400 3 3 0 6 8 8 400-500 3 3 0 6 7 7 500-600 3 3 0 6 8 8 600-700 3 3 1 7 8 8 700-800 3 3 0 6 8 8 800-900 3 3 0 6 8 8 900-1000 3 3 0 6 8 8 1000-1100 1 3 0 4 6 6 1100-1200 3 3 0 6 8 8
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: PIER AVENUE PIER AVENUE PIER AVENUE FROM / TO HERMOSA TO MANHATTAN HERMOSA TO MANHATTAN (SOUTH) MANHATTAN (SOUTH) TO MANHATTAN (NORTH) SIDE NORTH SIDE SOUTH SIDE SOUTH SIDE Space Type GREEN CURB METER TOTAL METER GREEN CURB TOTAL METER TOTAL Space Inventory 3 11 14 9 1 10 5 5 15 minute parking 3 hours parking - 3 hours parking - 15 minute parking Illegal 2 hours parking - only daily - No enforced 10 AM to enforced 10 AM to only daily - No enforced 10 AM to Parking Monday, Midnight Daily - Midnight Daily - Parking Monday, Midnight Daily - Wednesday, No parking No parking Wednesday, No Parking Restrictions Friday, Saturday, Monday, Monday, Friday, Saturday, Monday, Sunday 6:00 AM Wednesday, Wednesday, Sunday 6:30 AM Wednesday, to 6:30 AM Friday, Saturday, Friday, Saturday, to 7 AM Friday, Saturday, Sunday 6:00 AM Sunday 6:30 AM Sunday 6:30 AM to 6:30 AM to 7 AM to 7 AM 600-700 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 700-800 1 3 4 3 0 0 3 0 0 800-900 1 11 12 8 0 0 8 1 1 900-1000 2 11 13 9 0 0 9 3 3 1000-1100 3 11 14 8 1 0 9 5 5 1100-1200 1 11 12 9 0 0 9 4 4 1200-100 1 11 12 9 1 1 11 5 5 100-200 3 11 14 9 1 0 10 5 5 200-300 3 11 14 9 1 0 10 4 4 300-400 2 11 13 9 1 1 11 5 5 400-500 1 10 11 9 1 0 10 4 4 500-600 1 11 12 9 1 0 10 5 5 600-700 3 11 14 9 1 0 10 5 5 700-800 3 11 14 9 1 0 10 5 5 800-900 3 11 14 9 1 0 10 5 5 900-1000 3 9 12 9 1 0 10 5 5 1000-1100 3 10 13 8 0 0 8 4 4 1100-1200 2 11 13 8 0 0 8 4 4
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: MANHATTAN AVENUE MANHATTAN AVENUE FROM / TO 14TH TO PIER 14TH TO PIER SIDE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Space Type METER METER TOTAL METER UNMARKED TOTAL Space Inventory 3 5 8 3 1 4 3 Hours Parking - 24 Hours Parking - 3 Hours Parking - 1 Hour Enforced 10 AM to Enforced 10 AM to Enforced 10 AM to Midnight Daily - No Midnight Daily - No Midnight - No Parking Tuesday Parking Tuesday Parking Monday 8 Restrictions 10 AM to 2 PM - 10 AM to 2 PM - AM to 12 Noon Taxi Zone Taxi Zone Thursday to Thursday to Monday 9 PM to 3 Monday 9 PM to 3 AM AM 600-700 3 5 8 2 1 3 700-800 3 5 8 2 1 3 800-900 5 5 10 3 1 4 900-1000 5 5 10 3 1 4 1000-1100 5 5 10 1 1 2 1100-1200 5 5 10 3 1 4 1200-100 5 5 10 3 1 4 100-200 5 5 10 3 1 4 200-300 5 5 10 3 1 4 300-400 5 5 10 3 1 4 400-500 5 5 10 3 1 4 500-600 5 5 10 3 1 4 600-700 5 5 10 3 1 4 700-800 5 5 10 3 1 4 800-900 5 5 10 3 1 4 900-1000 4 4 8 3 1 4 1000-1100 3 4 7 3 1 4 1100-1200 4 4 8 2 1 3
Notes: WILTEC Tel: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 PARKING SURVEYS RESULTS SUMMARY
CLIENT: FEHR AND PEERS PROJECT: HERMOSA BEACH PARKING DATE: SATURDAY AUGUST 27, 2016
STREET: MANHATTAN AVENUE MANHATTAN AVENUE FROM / TO PIER TO 10TH PIER TO 10TH SIDE WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Space Type UNMARKED UNMARKED TOTAL UNMARKED TOTAL Space Inventory 14 3 17 11 11 1 Hour Parking 10 2 Hour Parking - 1 Hour Parking - Illegal AM to Midnight - 10 AM to Midnight - 10 AM to Midnight - No Parking No Permit Parking - No parking Restrictions Wednesday 8 AM No Parking Thursday 10 am to to 12 Noon Wednesday 8 AM 2 pm to 12 Noon
600-700 11 3 14 11 0 11 700-800 12 3 15 10 0 10 800-900 12 3 15 9 0 9 900-1000 13 3 16 11 0 11 1000-1100 11 3 14 11 0 11 1100-1200 14 3 17 11 0 11 1200-100 14 3 17 11 3 14 100-200 14 3 17 11 0 11 200-300 14 3 17 11 0 11 300-400 14 3 17 11 0 11 400-500 13 3 16 10 0 10 500-600 14 3 17 11 0 11 600-700 14 3 17 11 1 12 700-800 14 3 17 11 0 11 800-900 14 1 15 11 0 11 900-1000 14 3 17 11 0 11 1000-1100 13 2 15 11 0 11 1100-1200 14 3 17 11 11
Notes: 606 South Olive Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90014
Office: 213.488.4911 Fax: 213.488.4983 www.walkerparking.com
July 27, 2017
Mr. Michael Mathews Bolour Associates, Inc. 8383 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 920 Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Re: Strand & Pier Project Shared Parking Analysis
Dear Michael,
Walker Parking Consultants is pleased to provide the following Shared-Use Parking Needs Analysis for the Strand & Pier mixed-use redevelopment project (the “Project”) to identifying and recommending an accurate number of parking spaces necessary to park the land uses at the Project while ensuring that access to, and quality of, the already busy Coastal area is not negatively impacted by the construction of too few or too many parking spaces.
Sincerely
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
Steffen Turoff, AICP Jeff Weckstein Director, Planning Studies Parking Consultant Pacific Region Planning Studies Walker Parking Consultants Walker Parking Consultants
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL DEVELOPMENT HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for: BOLOUR ASSOCIATES, INC.
July 27, 2017
PROJECT NO. 37-8536.04
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT HERMOSA BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for: BOLOUR ASSOCIATES, INC.
JULY 27, 2017
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION...... III SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ...... II STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS...... IV STUDY BACKGROUND ...... V WHY A PARKING STUDY TO -RIGHT SIZE THE PROJECTS PARKING? ...... v CHANGING TRENDS ...... vii PROJECT DESCRIPTION, STUDY METHODOLOGY AND GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS ...... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 2 SHARED PARKING METHODOLOGY ...... 6 BASE PARKING RATIOS ...... 8 DRIVE RATIO (MODE SPLIT) ...... 8 NON-CAPTIVE ADJUSTMENT ...... 9 OTHER GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE STRAND PIER PROJECT ANALYSIS ...... 10 ASSUMPTIONS REGARDING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES (UBER, LYFT) ...... 12 METHODOLOGY FOR NON-CAPTIVE AND OTHER ASSUMPTIONS ...... 12 HOTEL GUEST ROOMS ...... 12 BEACH/HOTEL RETAIL AND SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS ...... 14 FAST FOOD/CARRY OUT RESTAURANT ...... 14 HOTEL SPA/WELLNESS SALON ...... 15 HOTEL RESTAURANT AND LOBBY LOUNGE ...... 15 HOTEL MEETING/BANQUET AREA ...... 16 CENTRAL COURTYARD TERRANCE/LOUNGE AREA AND ROOFTOP TERRACE SKY DECK ...... 17 FINDINGS ...... 18 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS ...... 19 SHARED PARKING OVERVIEW...... 20 SHARED PARKING PROJECTIONS FOR STRAND & PIER ...... 20 COMPARABLE SITE DATA/SHARED PARKING MODEL VALIDATION ...... 27 FINAL SHARED-USE PARKING RECOMMENDATION...... 29
APPENDIX A – PROPOSED PARKING PRICING AND VALIDATION STRCTURE ...... A-1
APPENDIX B – PARKING VALET OPERATIONS PLAN ...... B-1
APPENDIX C – TRANSPORTATION NETWORKED COMPANIES OBSERVATIONS ...... C-1
APPENDIX D – SHARED PARKING MODEL VALIDATION ...... D-1
APPENDIX E – PARKING PRICES FOR HOTELS IN COASTAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ……………E - 1
i STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04
LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES, AND PHOTOGRAPHS
Table 1: Existing and Proposed Land Use Summary ...... 5 Table 2: Drive In Percentages Observed for Hotel Guests in the Following Markets ...... 13 Table 3: City of Hermosa Beach Minimum Parking Requirements ...... 19 Table 4: Summary of Shared Parking Model Base Generation Ratios ...... 22 Table 5: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Adjustments ...... 23 Table 6: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Projections: Recommended Weekday Parking Supply ...... 24 Table 7: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Projections: Recommended Weekend Parking Supply ...... 25 Table 8: Comparable Hotel Information ...... 28 Table 9: Observed Parking Demand at Comparable Hotels ...... 30 Table B- 1: Proposed Aisle Parking Count ...... B-4 Table B- 2: Recommended Event Staffing Schedule ...... B-8 Table B- 3: Valet Level of Service (LOS) ...... B-9 Table C-1: Drive in Percentages Observed for Hotel Guests C-5 Table C-2: Rideshare Observed Service, Pier and Hermosa Avenue, Hermosa Beach C-6 Table D- 1: Shared Parking Southern California Case Studies ...... D-2
Figure 1: Strand & Pier Location ...... 3 Figure 2: Shared Parking Methodology ...... 7 Figure 3: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Projections Peak Weekend ...... 26 Figure 4: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Projections Peak Weekday...... 26 Figure B-1: Compact and Standard Typical Vehicle Dimensions ...... B-3 Figure B-2: Proposed Porte Cochere ...... B-5 Figure B-3: Proposed B1 Parking ...... B-6 Figure B-4: Proposed B2 Parking ...... B-7
Photograph C-1: Self-Driving Vehicle, Mountain View, California, October 2016 ...... C-2
ii STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04
INTRODUCTION
Walker Parking Consultants is pleased to provide the following Shared-Use Parking Needs Analysis for the Strand & Pier mixed-use redevelopment project (the “Project”) to identifying and recommending an accurate number of parking spaces necessary to park the land uses at the Project while ensuring that access to, and quality of, the already busy Coastal area is not negatively impacted by the construction of too few or too many parking spaces.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The following are our primary findings and conclusions: • Based on our shared parking analysis, Walker projects that the Strand & Pier Project will generate the following operational parking needs during intervals of peak activity on a typically busy day/night at full occupancy: o A recommended weekday parking supply of 189± parking stalls, and o A recommended weekend parking supply of 200± parking stalls. • Based on the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code parking requirements, Walker anticipates that the Strand & Pier has a code requirement of 472 parking spaces. When comparing the requirement with the actual parking demand projected by the shared parking analysis we note that the difference is in part the result of the following. o The City’s minimum parking requirement for a mixed-use project is a compounded, gross calculation that does not reflect that the proposed land uses will utilize parking spaces built on the site at different times of the day depending on the land use; o The minimum parking requirement does not take into account site-specific non- motorized (bicycles and pedestrians) transportation adjustments, demonstrated high drop-off usage (taxis, Uber and Lyft), and transit adjustments (used largely by employees) that will affect the actual projected parking demand; o The existing land uses where the Project will be built currently utilize public parking. However, no reductions in the City’s parking requirement for the Project are taken for the parking spaces that are currently used by, or required for the existing, parking-generating uses that will be removed as part of the proposed project. • The results of the shared parking analysis assume that a market rate/market comparable fee for hotels and auxiliary uses will be charged for the parking, as is customary and desirable for parking management purposes in similar types of projects, and that the parking system will be managed in a fashion that promotes shared parking between uses. • The results of the shared parking analysis assume that in addition to a fee-based parking structure, the project will also implement a validation system (sample included in Appendix A) to provide reasonable and accessible parking for project patrons, to minimize any impact on surrounding public parking. • The proposed subterranean parking will be entirely valet-parked. The valet parking program prepared for the Project site is referenced in the Appendices of this report.
iii STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04
• We do not recommend any 24x7 reserved parking for the hotel, but anticipate sufficient parking available in the evenings and overnight to accommodate overnight guests, with some percentage of guests anticipated to also stay (and remain parked) during the day. • The Project’s proposed parking supply of 223+ parking spaces is significantly higher than the parking supply provided/demand observed in our analysis of parking supply at twenty-one other luxury hotels in coastal Southern California on a per key and operational basis. • The shared parking model built for this engagement has been validated based on parking demand data collected at three comparable hotels in the South Bay, and based on the parking supply data collected at twenty-one luxury hotels in coastal Southern California. • The proposed Project is removing several existing uses that rely solely on public parking. Since the proposed project plans to accommodate parking demand for all proposed uses on site, the result will be a public benefit in the form of decreased on- and off-street public parking demand related to the removal of the existing uses which currently use public parking.
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Walker Parking Consultants (“Walker”) was founded as a parking design and consulting firm in 1965 and operates offices in 16 U.S. cities and two offices overseas. Walker is a qualified professional engineering and consulting firm specializing in parking design, parking planning studies, and restoration, with a focus on shared-use analyses. Moreover, current Walker staff member is the author of record and lead staff member on the Urban Land Institute’s / International Council of Shopping Center’s publication entitled Shared Parking, Second Edition, which is considered the primary industry resource for shared parking methodology, and Parking Requirements for Shopping Centers, Second Edition.
Walker has a strong track record of preparing shared parking analyses for mixed-use projects like the one performed in this study, and an intimate knowledge of the subject property, in part owing to a staff consultant and member of the project team, who lives one-block from the project site. Walker staff for this engagement include:
• Jeff Weckstein, Project Manager, a Parking Consultant who has a Master’s degree in Urban Planning from the University of California Irvine and over 10 years of experience in parking and transportation planning, shared-use parking, and mixed-use development in Southern California beach communities. He is a resident of Redondo Beach.
• Steffen Turoff, Technical Advisor, and Walker’s Director of Planning Studies for the West Coast, has a Master’s degree in Urban Planning from UCLA, and more than twelve years of experience in parking planning in Southern California. He is a resident of Los Angeles.
• Jonathan Wicks, Parking Consultant, and Walker’s West Coast lead for parking operations and technology consulting. He has over ten years’ experience in parking valet and
iv STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04
operations consulting in Southern California. He is a resident of Hermosa Beach and lives within one block of the Project site.
Walker Parking Consultants has completed hundreds of shared parking studies for public and private development sites. The Walker staff in the Los Angeles area has completed dozens of similar studies in the Los Angeles-Orange County Metropolitan Area, many led by the aforementioned consultants. Walker staff, including these consultants, have also completed parking analyses in other beach cities, subject to California Coastal Commission regulations or directly related to Coastal Plans, in Huntington Beach, Newport Beach, Redondo Beach, Long Beach, Santa Monica, Malibu, Del Mar, Pacific Beach (San Diego) and Dana Point among others.
STUDY BACKGROUND
A parking demand study represents an overlap of transportation and land use planning; we begin by looking at the location and any related, unique factors of a project. Located at the center of Hermosa Beach at the intersection of the Hermosa Beach Pier and the Marvin Braude Bike Trail (the “Strand”), an analysis of the Strand and Pier Hotel Project recognizes that the Project is well positioned to capitalize on the vibrancy and pedestrian density of downtown Hermosa Beach, one of the highest Walk- and Bike-Scores in Southern California, and the built in market created by the attraction of the beach – people who are already (parked or otherwise) in the area and then choose to frequent restaurants and bars . Because the Project is unique in land uses for the location, we recognize that City code requirements may not appropriately project the number of parking spaces necessary to serve the Project.
The Project consists of a one of a kind mixed-use project for downtown Hermosa Beach with hotel, restaurant and retail uses, replacing uses that are similar to existing restaurant, retail and residential uses along the Strand and the Pier. The overall net change in land use consists of construction of a hotel and its ancillary uses such as lounge and pool deck space and banquet/meeting space. However, unlike the existing uses, the Project’s planned uses share parking spaces more efficiently, as a significant amount (though not all) of the Hotel’s auxiliary space will be patronized by Hotel guests, already parked or otherwise traveled to the site.
Bolour Associates, Inc. (“Bolour”) has engaged Walker Parking Consultants to review the City’s parking requirements for the Project, assess the associated parking needs and then make operational recommendations to meet the total actual, operational parking demand projected to be generated by the planned development. The goal of this report is to recommend a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to satisfy its operational requirements without having any significant impact on other existing public parking in the area, or cause an impact to public coastal area parking or parking demand.
WHY A PARKING STUDY TO RIGHT SIZE THE PROJECTS PARKING?
This parking study is necessary in that typical municipal minimum parking requirements do not accurately predict parking provisions for mixed use projects, primarily because they do not take into account the efficiencies and shared nature of a mixed-use project with regard to parking. The result is more than 18.5 million parking spaces occupying an estimated 200 square miles of v STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04 space in Los Angeles County.1 Nor do they consider other site-specific efficiencies such as transportation mode split considerations.2 Below we cite some of this research. Some cities like San Diego have zoning codes which expressly contain standards for shared parking in their ordinances.3 The City of Hermosa Beach’s code does not, and thus alternative methodologies for accurately determining the appropriate number of parking spaces for a mixed-use site, particularly one containing a unique mix of land uses, become necessary.
Parking planning research and findings over the past 15 years conducted by prominent researchers, urban planning professors, and engineers such as Donald Shoup, Ph.D, P.E. FAICP at UCLA’s Luskin School of Public Policy, Richard Willson, Ph.D and FAICP at California Polytechnic University, Pomona, Michael Manville, Ph.D at Cornell University and UCLA, Colin Dentil-Post at UC Berkeley,4 and Mary Smith P.E. at Walker Parking Consultants on behalf of the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), have determined one or both of the following regarding municipal minimum parking requirements:
• Most municipal parking requirements established prior to 2005 have not been developed based on research or data; and
• Standards which mandate minimum parking requirements often exacerbate the parking impacts they are meant to remedy by expressly encouraging driving to a destination.
These findings are widely accepted and have been recognized, highlighted and disseminated by numerous and diverse governmental and transportation policy focused institutions including:
• The United States Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics5 • The Federal Highway Administration6 • Rand Corporation • The Mayors’ Innovation Project7 • The Reason Foundation8
1 http://www.accessmagazine.org/articles/fall-2016/do-cities-have-too-much-parking/
2 http://shoup.bol.ucla.edu/ProblemsWithParkingRequirementsInZoningOrdinances.pdf
3 City of San Diego Municipal Code, 142.0545 Shared Parking Requirements.
4 http://iurd.berkeley.edu/wp/2012-04.pdf
5http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/journal_of_transportation_and_statistics/volume _06_number_01/html/paper_01/index.html
6https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/climate_change/mitigation/publications/reference_sourcebook/page05. cfm#s2
7 http://www.mayorsinnovation.org/images/uploads/pdf/SURDNA_Parking_brief.pdf
8 http://reason.org:8080/news/printer/minimum-parking-mandates-are-ineffi
vi STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04
• The City of Santa Monica9 • The Los Angeles Sustainability Collaborative10 • The Parking Consultants Council of the National Parking Association • The Victoria Transportation Policy Institute11 • The American Planning Association
Important and expressly stated in the research findings cited above, the over-requiring of parking spaces brought about by minimum parking requirements leads to reductions in the transportation mode share for walking, biking and transit usage, and the associated environmental consequences.12 In this way higher and inflexible minimum parking requirements that over require parking are likely to be contrary to the strategies promoted in the City of Hermosa Beach’s General Plan, which states as the Objective 1.0 of its Transportation System Goals, Objectives and Policies:
Maximize the use of alternative transportation modes and multi-passenger vehicles for transportation within and through the City and decrease reliance on single passenger automobiles.13
The City of Hermosa Beach’s parking requirements similarly do not recognize the unique mixed- use nature of this project, as the zoning code and parking requirements are decades old.
The same can be said of the Code requirements’ relation to the Hermosa Beach Pedestrian Safety Assessment, which consistent with research findings, has recommended “reduced parking requirements” among other policy suggestions.14
CHANGING TRENDS
In addition to the now established research on minimum parking requirements, the Strand and Pier Project is being conceived at a unique period of transition in mobility trends in which California is witnessing the biggest changes in the use of the automobile in 60 years or more as a result of changing technologies, business models, demographics and preferences. The changes, such as car sharing, ride sharing, and greater interest in walkable places, impact the traditional model of driving to and parking at a destination. Thus, when determining the long- term planning needed for a capital investment such as a parking garage, an analysis should consider the impact of Transportation Network Companies (TNCs), or “rideshare” firms on future
9https://www.smgov.net/departments/pcd/agendas/Planning-Commission/2013/20130130/s2013013006Aa.pdf
10http://lasustainability.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/HildeSamaan-ParkingReformPolicyBrefingPaper.pdf
11 http://www.vtpi.org/park_man.pdf
12 https://www.planning.org/planning/2015/may/puttingacap.htm
13 http://www.hermosabch.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=761, Page 33, Section 4.0 Transportation
14 http://www.hermosabch.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=714, Page 10
vii STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04 demand. By all indications, ride sharing, and, further into the future, self-parking and self-driving cars, will change how parking should be provided as well. Some parking will always be needed but all indications are that less parking will be needed than current planning regulations suggest.15
Walker Parking Consultants has performed a shared parking analysis for the Strand and Pier Project. The objective of this shared parking analysis is to provide an industry-standard recommendation for a reasonable number of spaces to accommodate projected parking demand on a typical peak day/night at full occupancy. In addition to assisting Bolour in “right- sizing” the parking needs of the Project, the amount of parking required by the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code is compared to the shared parking study’s recommendations.
The analysis and comparison are necessary because the City’s code does not contemplate a mix of uses on one site. Instead the City’s code requires parking requirements for individual land uses only, and does not include any specific provisions for shared parking between a mix of land uses. Furthermore, the City’s code does not have any mechanism to look at parking “credits” for existing uses to remain, or existing uses to be replaced. This shared parking methodology, considering the overall peak parking demand of a mix of land uses, has been found to be more accurate and efficient than basing analyses on a land-use-by-land-use parking demand projection for individual land uses found in city codes. Recognizing the unique nature of some projects like the proposed Project, the City does permit an applicant to request review of a Parking Plan to justify a reduction in parking from code requirements. The results of the Walker shared parking analysis are intended to function as the Parking Plan for this Project.
A shared parking analysis has been prepared to determine the recommended parking supply to serve the Strand and Pier project. Our assumptions are based on differentials in the following factors:
1. The intensity, type and mix of proposed land uses including commercial retail, restaurants and a hotel (some land uses will be used not by outside customers but patrons already parked on site); 2. Hours of operation of the proposed uses and projected parking demand patterns (parking demand for hotel rooms peak late in the evening, but during the day or early evening some guests who drive are likely to have taken their car to an outside destination); 3. The rate of turnover for the proposed shared use spaces; 4. The anticipated peak parking and traffic loads for the site on a typical busy day; 5. The adjacency of viable transportation alternatives, including walkability and bikeability, to reduce parking demand;
15http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1152&context=crer
viii STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT # 37-8536.04
6. The primacy of the beach itself as the main attraction and destination in the area, especially during the peak beach season.16; 7. Methods of operation of the parking that will allow for shared parking; and 8. The percentage of spaces available for sharing versus those reserved for a specific tenant.
16 When large crowds are at the beach, it is likely that these people, already in the beach area, will make up a significant percentage of patronage for the non-hotel components of the Project, rather than people driving on busy days to visit the site. Variations in parking demand for restaurant and retail are key determinants of when and how much parking demand will peak. The impact is likely to occur in several ways: large crowds at the beach during periods of peak demand are likely to provide a greater customer base for businesses on the site than patrons who drive in. The busy conditions around the beach are also likely to discourage people from driving in from offsite specifically to frequent on site businesses. To some extent this is true for hotel and event patrons as well. At times when the beach is the main attraction, it is likely that hotel patrons will have less reason to drive on and off the site. This would include fewer business people and more tourists who are staying at Strand and Pier to enjoy the beach attraction. These guests will have less impetus to drive to and park on the site. This will not be true for all, or perhaps most hotel patrons, but a significant enough amount that it should be considered. Overall, periods of peak pedestrian and bike times in the area will typically generate lower parking demand per patron as congestion in the area will create more business and less impetus for people from offsite to drive to the location.
ii
PROJECT DESCRIPTION, STUDY METHODOLOGY AND GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
1 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Bolour is currently in the entitlements phase to construct a mixed-use project at the intersection of the Pier and the Strand in the City of Hermosa Beach. The Project site is bound by the Strand to the west, 13th Street to the north, City of Hermosa Beach parking Lot B to the east and Pier Plaza to the south. The Project will displace existing retail, restaurant and residential uses on the site and replace them with a mixed-use project containing boutique hotel, ancillary hotel uses (restaurant, lobby, bar, lounge, pool deck), retail uses and restaurants.
The Strand & Pier Project is located in the heart of downtown Hermosa Beach, steps from the beach, at the intersection of the Hermosa Beach Pier and the Strand. The Strand, also known as the Marvin Braude Bike Trail, is a paved bicycle path that runs for 22 miles connecting Will Rogers State Beach in Pacific Palisades, Santa Monica, Venice, Marina Del Rey and Manhattan, Hermosa and Redondo Beaches by bicycle. In the vicinity of the Hermosa Beach Pier, the Strand is utilized by both bicyclists and pedestrians.
The site is currently serviced directly by LA Metro and Beach Cities Transit (BCT). While unlikely to provide service to most hotel guests, when transit service is available it is typically used by a significant percentage of hotel employees.17
BCT Route 109 runs from Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) to Riviera Village in Redondo Beach with a stop at the Hermosa Avenue/11th Street intersection (southbound) and Hermosa Avenue/10th Street intersection (northbound) approximately 0.20 miles from the project site. BCT line 109 runs from 6:00 AM through 10:00 PM, seven days a week, with headways of 30-40 minutes. Metro Bus Route 232 runs from LAX to Downtown Long Beach with a stop at the Pacific Coast Highway/Pier Avenue intersection approximately 0.50 miles east of the project site. Route 232 runs from approximately 5:00 AM to 11:00 PM, seven days a week, with headways of 15-30 minutes on weekdays, and 30 minutes on weekends. Metro Bus Route 130 runs from Cerritos to Redondo Beach with a stop at the Hermosa Avenue/11th Street intersection (southbound) and Hermosa Avenue/10th Street intersection (northbound) approximately 0.20 miles from the project site. Route 130 runs from approximately 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM with 30-45 minute headways on weekdays and from 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM with 60 minute headways on weekends.
LAX is approximately seven miles north of the project site. The significance of the close proximity of a major airport suggests a significant time and monetary incentive not to rent a car for hotel guests who plan to spend most of their time on the hotel Project site.
Our observations indicate that Uber, Lyft and taxi service are a popular method of traveling to and within the commercial and beach area surrounding the site. TNCs have generally not made data available for transportation research however, based on a variety of sources from which
17 For example, in a comprehensive city-wide parking rate study Walker performed for the City of Santa Monica in 2012, in stakeholder meetings with the City’s Chamber of Commerce, Walker was told that hotel employees typically did not drive to their place of employment. Where transit service was not available, the majority of employees were said to be dropped off at work by family or friends. In locations with transit service, it was more heavily relied upon by employees. 2 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04 we have collected data, a preliminary analysis and finding is provided elsewhere in this document.
Figure 1 illustrates the location of the proposed Strand & Pier project.
Figure 1: Strand & Pier Location
Source: Image, Google Earth Professional, 2016; graphics, Walker Parking Consultants, 2016.
Walker’s analysis is based on programming data verified by Bolour, and as included in the entitlement applications filed with the City of Hermosa Beach. The Project is anticipated to include the following land uses:
• 100-key boutique hotel with the following ancillary uses: o 4,480 square foot lobby lounge and bar (3,579 square foot lobby/lounge plus 901 square feet of outdoor seating) o 2,539 square foot hotel restaurant (including outdoor seating)
3 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
o 2,857 square foot spa/wellness center o 2,406 square feet of meeting/private dining space o 3,956 square foot public rooftop lounge and bar o 6,912 square foot pool deck • 5,215 square feet of retail space including a bike shop and bicycle valet facilities • 5,757 square feet of sit-down restaurant space, including outdoor seating; and • 2,192 square feet of beach serving concessions without inside seating, including outdoor seating.
The Strand & Pier Project will provide 178 parking spaces in a valet-only subterranean parking structure below the development. The valet-only operation, described in detail in Appendix B, is projected to add 45± parking spaces to the functional capacity of the Project’s parking structure, as needed for a total parking supply of 223+ parking spaces.
The Project will displace the following existing land uses:
• 1,022 square foot restaurant and 1,241 square foot patio (Good Stuff) • 1,271 square foot bar (The Deck) • 2,560 square foot restaurant (The Mermaid) • 3,171 square foot restaurant (Playa Hermosa Fish and Oyster) • 1,062 square foot retail/coffee shop (Pier Surf) • 800 square foot retail (Trek) • 2,623 square feet of Pier retail (Tiki Mon and Lapperts) • 331 square feet of outdoor seating on Pier Avenue for Killer Shrimp • 1,575 square foot bike shop • 8 apartment dwelling units
The Project will displace 22 existing parking spaces, consisting of the following: • 15 spaces in the Mermaid parking lot • 7 spaces at the existing apartment building
Table 1 on the next page summarizes the existing and proposed land uses on the site.
4 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Table 1: Existing and Proposed Land Use Summary
Land Use Existing Proposed
Hotel 100 keys - Lobby/Lounge and Bar 4,480 SF - Restaurant 2,539 SF - Spa/Wellness 2,857 SF - Meeting/Private Dining Space 2,406 SF - Rooftop Lounge/Bar 3,956 SF - Pool Deck 6,912 SF Retail 6,060 SF 5,215 SF Sit Down Restaurants 9,596 SF 5,757 SF Beach Serving/Fast Restaurants 2,192 SF Apartments 8 DU Parking Spaces 22 Spaces 223 Spaces Note: Du = Dwelling Unit. SF = Square Feet
Includes outdoor seating
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
Bolour has engaged Walker to address projected on-site parking needs for the Project based on assumed shared-use of the on-site parking and based on anticipated modal split and captive adjustments appropriate for the site; the actual, typical peak parking demand rather than the theoretical number of parking spaces needed per the City’s minimum parking requirements.
5 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
SHARED PARKING METHODOLOGY
Shared parking is the use of a parking area to serve two or more individual land uses without conflict or encroachment. The ability to share parking spaces is the result of two conditions:
1. Variations in the accumulation of vehicles by hour, by day, or by season at the individual land uses, and 2. Relationships among the land uses that result in visiting multiple land uses on the same auto trip.
The key goal of a shared parking analysis is to find the balance between providing adequate parking to support the land uses within a development from a commercial and operational standpoint while minimizing the negative aspects of excessive land area or resources devoted to parking. In general, a shared parking analysis considers the types, quantities and user groups of land uses for a development, as well as site- and market-specific characteristics. The ultimate goal of a shared parking analysis is to find the peak period, or design day condition; according to ULI's Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, "A design day or design hour is one that recurs frequently enough to justify providing spaces for that level of parking activity.”
Allowing multiple land uses and entities to share parking spaces has allowed for and led to the creation of many popular developments and districts, resulting in the combination of hospitality, office, residential, retail, and entertainment districts that rely heavily on shared parking practices to be compact, thereby fitting in with an area’s character, walkable and viable projects. In the same way, mixed-use projects have also benefited from the shared parking principle, which offers multiple benefits to a community, not the least of which is a lesser environmental impact from the reduction in required parking needed to serve commercial developments as well as the ability to create a more desirable mix of uses at one location.
Appendix D includes 13 case studies of shared parking commercial centers, nine of them in Southern California. We recognize that commercial centers are much larger and more diverse than the Project. However, we suggest that what is important about the research is that the case studies validate the accuracy of the Shared Parking effort and the validated success of shared parking policies. The effort was heavily focused in Southern California.
The flow chart on the following page describes in general the logical progression of a shared parking analysis with adjustments made depending on the specific circumstances of the mix of land uses and location under study.
6 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Figure 2: Shared Parking Methodology
Gather and review project data Type and quantity of land uses Local zoning standards of practices Existing conditions, parking pricing, local users, and facilities if appropriate Local mode splits, transit, and transportation demand management programs Physical relationships between uses Parking management strategies acceptable to the various parties
Select parking ratios (space/ unit land use) W eekends and weekdays Visitor/ customer, employee/ resident, and reserved
Select factors and analyze differences in activity patterns Time of day Monthly
Develop scenarios for critical parking need periods
Adjust ratios for modal split and persons per car for each scenario
Apply noncaptive adjustments for each scenario
Calculate required parking spaces for each scenario
Do scenarios reflect all critical parking NO needs and management concerns?
YES
Recommend a parking plan Test adequacy of parking for key scenarios Evaluate potential facilities and allocation of spaces for key scenarios Confirm physical relationships between uses to encourage shared parking Recommend parking management plan to achieve projected shared parking
Source: Adapted from Shared Parking 2nd Edition, 2005.
7 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
BASE PARKING RATIOS
To begin a shared parking analysis, the type and quantity of land uses are analyzed. Each land use has a specific metric considered by the parking industry to be a reliable meter of parking demand for that use. For hotels that metric is the number of rooms, for restaurants and most other uses we use square footage. The parking demand is divided by the quantity for each metric to generate a parking ratio for each land use based on that metric (i.e. for restaurant the ratio is presented as “spaces per thousand square feet of gross floor area”; for Hotel the ratio is presented as “spaces per room”).
This ratio, called the base parking ratio, is the result of industry research of stand-alone “cornfield18” sites or on empirical data when available for an existing site. When multiplied by the given quantity for a land use in a proposed development, the base parking ratio is considered to produce the peak parking that land use would require. Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, 2005 uses the 85th percentile of peak-hour observations for recommended parking ratios, unless otherwise noted.
For a mixed-use site this calculation (Quantity X Base Parking Ratio) provides the maximum amount of parking needed for the site without consideration to the dynamics of the site and market, and interplay between activity levels for each land use. These adjustments are found in the subsequent steps of a shared parking analysis.
DRIVE RATIO (MODE SPLIT)
The drive ratio represents a reduction in anticipated spaces needed to account for employees and visitors arriving to the site by means other than a single-occupant vehicle (SOV). These other means include mass transit, carpooling/vanpooling, drop offs, bicycling, or walking from locations outside of the development site, etc.
A large site, even without transit access will typically experience some reduction in the SOV ratio due to carpooling, drop offs or other ways people find to commute. Walker utilizes market and site specific data sources to generate assumptions for a drive ratio reduction. Market data is generally available from the US Census; Walker obtained a database of various census tracks which provides means of transportation to work data by location of workplace. This data may be used to support reductions in employee parking. Ultimately no reductions in the drive ratio were identified for the site and no adjustments to the Model were made in this category.
In the event that a reduction is limited, Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, 2005 suggests conservatively assuming a 100% drive-alone mode split because to some degree the base parking ratios already account for a small amount of ridesharing, drop-offs, and walking.
18 A “cornfield” development is defined as a site that cannot be easily reached through transit and does not have neighboring land uses where demand from one use would overflow to the adjacent site.
8 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
NON-CAPTIVE ADJUSTMENT
The non-captive ratio is the second factor modified when tailoring a shared parking model. “captive market” is borrowed from market researchers to describe people who are already present at certain times of the day. In a shared parking analysis, the term “captive market” reflects the adjustment of parking needs and vehicular trip generation rates due to interaction among land-uses internal to the site. Traditionally, a non-captive adjustment is used to fine-tune the parking requirements for restaurants and retail patronized by hotel guests, already counted as being parked for the day (including residents and their guests).
Generally, non-captive parking considerations for any mixed-use development take into account that some visitors to a specific land use may already be parked or have arrived at the site to visit multiple land uses on the site, such as when an office worker visits a restaurant within the same development. A shared parking analysis assumes some percentage of patrons at one business (restaurant) may be employees of another business (office) located in the same development. This is referred to as the “effects of a captive market,” as some of the restaurant’s patrons are already parking at the site to work; therefore, they contribute only once to the number of peak hour spaces utilizing the development’s parking supply. In other words, with shared parking, the parking demand ratio for individual land uses can be corrected downward in proportion to the captive market support of the neighboring land uses.
The precise definition of a “captive market” refers to people already within a site (for example hotel guests who patronize the hotel’s restaurants and bars). However, in a beach location, the definition should be broader because much of the restaurant, retail and bar patronage is likely not only from on-site hotel guests, but people for whom the beach is their primary destination. This broader definition and phenomenon has been referred to by some in transportation planning as “district capture.” Given the large crowds on busy beach days - and the high bicycle and pedestrian traffic recorded in the area - it is reasonable to assume that the businesses within the Project will capture a significant amount of patronage from people for whom businesses within the Project are not their primary destination. Given the large numbers of people present in the area, we assume that some district capture effect is reasonable in the case of the Project’s auxiliary uses.
9 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
OTHER GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE STRAND PIER PROJECT ANALYSIS
The following general assumptions are applied to this analysis:
1. Paid parking is assumed for all user groups in a way that is typical for efficient parking management practices at similar locations. This study assumes that pricing and validation systems will be consistent with market comparables for similarly sited hotel and mixed-use properties. Appendix E demonstrates that of 41 hotels in coastal Southern California that we surveyed, 36 charged guests for parking. A sample pricing and validation system is included in Appendix A. 2. As noted earlier, Walker’s shared-use methodology is based on the Second Edition of Shared Parking, the parking planning industry standard for shared parking data.19 The study and data are a co-publication of the Urban Land Institute and the International Council of Shopping Centers, and based on other industry standards and research data collected by a nationwide team of five parking consultants from parking and transportation and parking consulting firms from across the nation.20 These include base ratios before adjustments leveraging much of the data used in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Parking Generation publication.21 Walker Parking Consultants and its Senior Vice President Mary Smith served as the lead consultant in developing this body of work. The recommended parking capacity presented herein is designed in most cases to represent the 85th or 90th percentile conditions, consistent with the recommendations contained within Shared Parking. The ‘base’ unadjusted parking ratios utilized in the Shared Parking Model are based on the most recent years of research in Southern California and automobile dependent sites throughout the United States.22 Actual research has produced significantly different results than most City codes and based on the analysis, the City of Hermosa Beach minimum parking requirements for each land use as well. In some cases, such as sit-down restaurants, the base ratio utilized in the Shared Parking Model is much higher than City code requirements as it is based on actual data, and in other cases, such as quick-serve restaurants, the model base ratio is lower based on actual utilization patterns.
19 Smith, Mary S. Shared Parking, Second Edition. Urban Land Institute, 2005. 20 Smith, Mary S., Shared Parking, Second Edition, Washington, D.C.: ULI-the Urban Land Institute and the International Council of Shopping Centers, 2005. Page 6. Along with Mary Smith, team members included Pat Gibson (Gibson Transportation Consultants, Los Angeles), Randy McCourt (Chair, Institute of Transportation Engineers Committee), Gerry Salzman of Desman parking consultants, whose article, “Hotel Parking: How Much is Enough?” Urban Land, January 1988, is a foundation for hotel parking demand projections and which informs parking demand projections within the Shared Parking model. Marty Wells (Wells and Associates) and Jerry Wentzel (DKS Associates) also evaluated key land use data for Shared Parking.
21 Parking Generation, Third Edition (Washington, D. C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2004).
22 For example, the committee updating Shared Parking from the First Edition to the most recent Second Edition conducted a series of thirteen case studies to verify that the shared parking model was reasonably accurate. These studies were conducted at a variety of commercial centers in California, Arizona, Ohio, Florida, and Virginia. Eight of the thirteen case studies were on commercial centers in Southern California. A more in depth discussion of the analysis and assessment of accuracy of the Shared Parking Model is contained in Appendix D of this document. 10 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
3. Certain adjustments for public transit have been applied to the ULI/Walker’s model, based on census data from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Census Transportation Planning Products Program (CTPP) for the Hermosa Beach Area. We have also reviewed planning documents such as the South Bay Bicycle Master Plan and the Hermosa Beach 2014 Area Survey and incorporated reasonable transit usage goals into our baseline assumptions. Lastly, we have made adjustments to account for non-motorized (walking and bicycle) trips. Bolour and Provenance Hotels provided additional information related to the hotel land use that are included in our discussion of the different land uses that will make up the Project. The assumptions found and incorporated into the analysis include the following: a. Based on the United States Census American Community Survey table A202105 (Means of Transportation, Workers 16 years and over), approximately 71 percent of employees within the Project’s census tract drive or ride to work in a personal vehicle near the project site. b. The 2014 area use survey indicated that 56% of patrons coming to the beach arrive via automobile, with the remainder walking, bicycling or taking transit. c. In a community with a Walkscore of 92/100 and Bikescore of 95/100, pedestrian and bicycle mode shares are likely to have a greater impact on parking demand than the availability of nearby public transit. It is reasonable to expect that a high Walkscore and Bikescore will reduce the likelihood of guests, patrons and employees driving to and parking at the site. 4. Due to the walkability (scoring a 92 “Walker’s Paradise” score on walkscore.com) and bike-ability of downtown Hermosa Beach, along with the increasing popularity of ridesharing services such as Uber and Lyft in lieu of rental cars and hotel shuttles, some hotel guests will arrive at the Strand & Pier without a car, and will not keep a car during their stay. 5. As noted within the discussion of the non-captive factor, it is assumed that a significant percentage of patrons of the retail and restaurant uses will already be at Hermosa Beach, from visiting the beach or other downtown commercial uses as their primary destination, from staying at one of the other local hotels within walking distance, or from staying at the proposed hotel at the Strand & Pier. 6. The proposed hotel will provide free bicycle rentals to guests of the hotel. Additionally, the project proposes to significantly improve accessibility to short-term bicycle parking spaces by providing an increased quantity of bike racks within the public right-of way adjacent to the project site. Lastly, the project is proposing an on-site bicycle valet service in conjunction with the vehicular valet program on site to provide additional secured and longer-term bicycle parking for the public and visitors of the project. The bicycle valet program will consist of a storage facility with over 100 bicycle parking spaces within the subterranean parking structure. 7. Walker’s analysis does not include an analysis of or projections of demand for the following: bicycle parking spaces, loading spaces, and disabled parking spaces. It is assumed that these accommodations will be provided consistent with or in excess of the City of Hermosa Beach’s Municipal Code Zoning and Building Code Requirements, and are hereby incorporated into the project by the project Architect. 11 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
8. The program data used in this memorandum were provided by Bolour. 9. The results of the shared parking analysis were reviewed in light of available data at other existing comparable hotels as well as recent approvals of comparable hotels as a check on the conclusions of the model. Discussion of comparable sites is provided in Table 11 after the shared parking analysis on page.
ASSUMPTIONS REGARDING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES (UBER, LYFT)
With the exception of long-term airport parking, no other parking segment has been impacted as much by the business model of ridesharing companies Uber and Lyft as hotels. The significant – and continued – reduction in self-park from these services is being observed and analyzed in greater detail in Appendix C of this report. We note that assumptions regarding TNC impacts have not been applied to the models for this analysis as they have not yet been recognized by CTPP or other transportation data although reductions in demand from 10% to 20% have been observed, as noted in Appendix C.
METHODOLOGY FOR NON-CAPTIVE AND OTHER ASSUMPTIONS
Given the large number of people in the immediate area of the Project during the time of the projected peak in parking demand, it is reasonable to assume that a significant percentage of patrons of the retail and restaurant uses will already be in Hermosa Beach: • With the beach as their primary destination; • Staying at the proposed hotel; • Staying at another local hotel within walking distance; • Offsite businesses as their primary destination; • Residents who live within close proximity; These non-captive visitors not require additional parking. Based on our knowledge of the location and mix of land uses we set forth the following assumptions as reasonable. In some cases, we include some discussion of the drive ratio as it is helpful to understand the non-captive ratio in the context of how many people will be driving in alone from off site.
HOTEL GUEST ROOMS
The project includes 100 guest rooms; about which we assume for the purpose of peak parking demand projections:
• A 100% occupancy rate is assumed for projecting peak parking demand, recognizing that average hotel occupancy rates are significantly lower; • Approximately 60% of the guest population will arrive via private automobile, according to estimates from Provenance Hotels; this assumption is more than double the drive in percentage that Provenance has observed in its Seattle and Portland markets. The
12 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
following information was provided by Provenance. The reduction in parking demand from guests that is beginning to be seen at some locations is discussed in Appendix C.
Table 2: Drive In Percentages Observed for Hotel Guests in the Following Markets
Drive in Rates by Percentage of Guests at Provenance Hotels Year Seattle San Diego Portland 2016 19% 35% 32% 2015 21% 33% 34% 2014 22% 38% 34% 2013 21% 34% Average 21% 35% 33%
Source: Bolour Associates and Provenance Hotels, 2016
• A 71% employee drive ratio is assumed based on the United States Census American Community Survey table A202105 (Means of Transportation, Workers 16 years and over), which states that approximately 71 percent of employees within the Project’s census tract drive or ride to work in a personal vehicle near the Project site. We note that hotel employees, who on average are lower income, tend to have lower car ownership and as a result, a lower drive ratio, in our experience.23 • An 80% hotel guest presence factor at the 5:00 pm weekday peak per the extensive research described in the development of the Shared Parking Model and in some cases other sources24; some guests are assumed to be out at this hour for dining or leisure purposes; • A 90% presence factor at the 8:00 pm weekend peak, again per the research described in the development of the Shared Parking Model and other sources25; some guests are assumed to be out at this hour for dining or leisure purposes; • Non-captive ratios do not apply to a hotel land use as it is the primary destination for patrons coming to the site.
23http://industry-salaries.careertrends.com/l/23465/Hotel-Motel-and-Resort-Desk-Clerks-in-Administrative- and-Support-Services 24 The Shared Parking Model as well as multiple sources indicate that demand for hotel guest room parking peaks between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. on weekdays and Saturdays. Authors Walter Rutes and Richard Penner conclude that demand for guest rooms peaks between midnight and 4 a.m. for Monday through Thursday and for Saturday ( Walter A. Rutes and Richard H. Penner, Hotel Planning and Design (New York, New York: Watson-Guptill Publications, 1985), 194. Because some of the resource information was written more than a decade ago, the authors of three of the primary works were consulted about more recent published material. The works mentioned in this article appear to be the most recent published data available; the principles and methodology have not changed. This information is discussed at https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Variables+that+influence+hotel+parking+demand.-a054010760 and is consistent with the data in the ULI Shared Parking Model. 25 Ibid. 13 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
BEACH/HOTEL RETAIL AND SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS
These beach/hotel retail and sit-down restaurants are assumed to be third-party retail/restaurant establishments that while within the Project, are independent operators from the Hotel and will function in a similar manner to any other commercial establishment on Pier Plaza, where most visitors will be intentional. To the extent a greater percentage of patrons of these businesses are made up of hotel guests, parking demand will decrease, but the assumptions are Project-specific and are made to reflect conservatively high demand projections: Based on the market assumptions that these businesses will be operated independently of the Hotel, in a similar manner as other commercial establishments on Pier Plaza and patronized by intentional visitors, our assumption is that nine of ten patrons will come from off site during the peak; the model therefore assumes 90% non-captive ratio assumes that nine out of ten customers will come from off site and not from Hotel guests or other businesses on site. This compares to the Shared Parking Model’s 100% non-captive default ratio (ten of ten customers come from offsite) for a location with no mix of land uses. • 40% of patrons who arrive from off site are assumed to drive to these businesses in the hotel, as their primary destination. This compares the Shared Parking Model’s 100% default drive ratio (ten of ten) for an entirely auto-dependent, suburban location. • A 71% employee drive ratio is assumed based on the United States Census American Community Survey table A202105 (Means of Transportation, Workers 16 years and over), which states that approximately 71% of employees within the Project’s census tract drive or ride to work in a personal vehicle near the project site. • Assuming the most conservatively high 100% non-captive ratio resulted in no impact on the peak weekend parking demand for this land use or the site, but an increase in the projected weekday peak of one parking space. This would assume that all customers for the retail came from outside of the hotel, which we suggest is unreasonable.
FAST FOOD/CARRY OUT RESTAURANT
Two walkup style casual café spaces are planned adjacent to the public plaza at the terminus of 13th Street and Beach Drive. These cafés are programmed with walk-up window/snack bar to serve beach goers and outdoor dining at the corner of 13th Street and The Strand. The Fast-Food Beach serving retail located on 13th Street and the Strand are intended to be quick-serve food service uses for beach goers or strand users. Given the small size of these establishments, it is highly unlikely that these will ever serve as “destinations,” particularly for drivers. They are intended as convenience food for the greater Hermosa Beach community already in the area or at the hotel. Given this business model, it is an unreasonable assumption to expect that during a peak beach day, that a material number of people would drive to this location with a fast food establishment as their primary destination, in part given the large number of beach goers, pedestrians and cyclists who would make up a large proportion of the business for this establishment at this time. We therefore use the following assumptions for these businesses: 14 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
• 95% non-captive ratio assumes that effectively all (nineteen out of twenty) patrons will come from off site; just one of twenty patrons is assumed to come from within the hotel and its auxiliary uses. This compares to the Shared Parking Model’s 100% non-captive default ratio for a location with no additional land uses on the site.
• Given the number of beach goers and large numbers of pedestrians during peak hours, 5% of patrons from off site are assumed to make the fast food/carry out restaurant their primary destination and parking primarily for this purpose. This compares with the Shared Parking Model’s 100% default drive ratio for a stand-alone, suburban, entirely auto- dependent location, where restaurants are effectively only accessible by car and parking is provided in large, free surface lots.
• Despite the lower driving ratio for patrons, we assume a relatively high (71%) drive ratio for employees based on the aforementioned United States Census American Community Survey table A202105 (Means of Transportation, Workers 16 years and over), which states that approximately 71% of employees within the Project’s census tract drive or ride to work in a personal vehicle near the project site.
HOTEL SPA/WELLNESS SALON
The spa/wellness center on site will be comprised of a fitness center, exclusively for the use of hotel guests and spa visitors only, as well as a number of treatment rooms within the spa itself. While the spa is open to the public, the small size of the facility is intended to be an amenity for hotel guests and will be conducive for use by hotel guests on the site, as opposed to members of the public driving in from off site. • Based on the assumption that the spa/wellness center is intended primarily for hotel guests, it is assumed that only one in four guests, or 25% of the patrons will be non-captive, and that 75% of spa salon’s patrons will be hotel guests. However, we assume that a significant number of people who come from offsite will drive, generating parking demand. Spa patrons would be less likely to drive from outside the area for the primary purpose of enjoying the spa facilities given the congestion caused by beach demand. The non-captive ratio in this case compares to the Shared Parking Model’s default ratio for a hotel restaurant and bar of 30% on weekends (70% being hotel guests).
• We assume that 80% (weekdays) and 60% (weekends) of these patrons from off site would drive to the location as their primary destination at the beach. This compares to the Shared Parking Model’s 60% and 70% default drive ratio respectively, for a hotel bar restaurant use in an entirely auto-dependent, suburban location. The drive ratios assumed are therefore reasonable.
HOTEL RESTAURANT AND LOBBY LOUNGE
The hotel restaurant on site will be the primary food-service space for the hotel operations itself, providing three meals a day for the hotel guests. In addition, this restaurant and kitchen will serve all of the room service, catering, and public areas of the project (lobby lounge, pool
15 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04 deck/terrace, roof deck). This restaurant is primarily for hotel guests and users, but open to the public. While some restaurant patrons may visit the project intentionally to dine at this restaurant, the business plan calls for patrons to be primarily from within the hotel, or patrons and visitors of other uses on-site. One of the central spaces of the project is the hotel’s lobby lounge and patio at the ground floor of the project. This is the location for hotel guests, as the developer has characterized the use, to interact with the general public in a new “living room” for the city. This lobby lounge serves as the greeting area for arriving and departing guests, as well as a meeting place for guests to gather. Therefore, while the lobby itself is not anticipated to generate parking demand, the adjacent lobby lounge, which is also open to the general public to enjoy the on- site facilities and views, we project will generate parking demand during peak periods. Most visitors to the lobby lounge space will be patrons of the hotel, or visitors already within Hermosa Beach for other uses. Based on a similar mix of use by hotel patrons and visitors, the lobby lounge is projected to generate parking demand based on the same non-captive ratios and drive ratios: • The 50% non-captive ratio used for both weekday and weekend parking demand projections assumes that up to half of restaurant patrons will come from off site; a conservatively high number for parking demand projections given the restaurants emphasis on serving hotel guests. This compares to the Shared Parking Model’s 90% non- captive default ratio for hotel restaurant patrons on weekdays, but 30% non-captive on weekends.
• Given the number of beach goers and large numbers of pedestrians during peak hours, 40% of patrons from off site are assumed to drive to the destination on weekdays, 25% on weekends. This compares with the Shared Parking Model’s 60% weekday and 70% weekend for a stand-alone, suburban, entirely auto-dependent location, where restaurants are effectively only accessible by car and parking is provided in large, free surface lots.
HOTEL MEETING/BANQUET AREA
The B1 level of the project includes approximately 2,406 square feet of pre-function, meeting, and ballroom space which are available to hotel guests, but may also be available for rent by the general public for meetings, events, and private celebrations. These facilities are accessible from the ground floor via elevators and stairwells located in a foyer adjacent to the porte cochere and lobby. The focus of parking demand for this use is during the weekday and weekend peaks for the Project as a whole. To project parking demand for this use we use the following assumptions:
• The 100% daytime and 70% evening non-captive ratio for the hotel meeting and banquet area used for both the weekday and weekend peak parking demand period assumes that none of the people using these facilities for daytime events will be hotel guests and that less than half of people using these facilities for evening events will be hotel guests.
16 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
This compares to the Shared Parking model’s data points that assume a 60% non-captive ratio for conference and banquet space on weekdays and the model’s 70% non-captive ratio assumption on weekends.
• We project parking demand using a drive ratio of 80% for this land use; four of five patrons not staying at the hotel are assumed to drive. This ratio is higher than the Shared Parking model’s 75% default drive ratio for both weekday and weekend for a hotel ballroom and conference hall land use.
CENTRAL COURTYARD TERRANCE/LOUNGE AREA AND ROOFTOP TERRACE SKY DECK
The second floor includes a 6,912 sf central courtyard terrace and lounge area serving primarily as an amenity for overnight hotel guests. The terrace spans the center of the Project from east to west and includes food and beverage serving seating, water features, landscaping, and hotel serving splash zone with associated sundeck lounge area. A portion of the terrace facing the strand includes a publicly accessible lounge and sundeck area fronting the Strand with views of the beach and the ocean. Only a portion of the pool deck will be publicly accessible.
In addition to the second floor terrace, the proposed Project is designed with a rooftop “sky deck” open to both hotel guests and the greater Hermosa Beach community. The rooftop includes an approximately 3,580 square-foot public roof terrace, a 376-square foot chef’s garden,26 and 2,660 square feet of planted green roofing (the latter not included in parking demand calculations). It is intended that movable furniture will be provided on the roof deck. This area will be open to the public and serve limited food and beverage from one of the hotel restaurants. The entire rooftop may be opened up during the evening, and utilized together for both public and private special events and gatherings for hotel guests and the greater community. • Because only a portion of the pool deck is publicly accessible, a 40% non-captive ratio was calculated and assumed; 60% of pool deck patrons will be hotel guests but 40% will come from off site, based on the overall area of the pool deck that is expected to be typically available to the public. • Non-hotel guests utilizing the space will consist of people from off site, either visiting other destinations as their primary destination, such as the beach or Strand, or coming to the location by car, walking, or bicycle. • The 40% non-captive ratio compares with the Shared Parking Model’s 90% non-captive default ratio for a hotel restaurant lounge on weekends, owing to what is expected to be a key amenity feature for hotel guests. • The drive ratio for the weekend peak assumes that on average half of all patrons coming from off site will drive alone.
26 Parking demand ratios typically reflect blended activity throughout the land use; some spaces will generate people arriving at the site by car, some will serve people who are already on the site. The chef’s garden is likely a low demand use, reducing the overall ratio for the use classification, but this assumption is incorporated into the analysis. 17 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
FINDINGS
18 STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The City of Hermosa Beach parking requirements for the Strand & Pier project are set forth in Chapter 17.44 (Off-Street Parking) of the City’s Municipal Code are shown. Table 3 summarizes Walker’s calculations for the parking requirements for the Strand & Pier project per the City of Hermosa Beach Municipal Code.
Table 3: City of Hermosa Beach Minimum Parking Requirements
Parking Proposed Uses Quantity/Size Ratio per HBMC Required 1 space per Key (first 50 keys) Hotel 100 keys 1 space per 1.5 keys (50-100 keys) 83 - Hotel Restaurant (incl. outdoor) 2,539 SF 1 space per 100 SF 25 - Lobby/Lounge (incl. outdoor) 4,480 SF 1 space per 80 SF 56 - Spa/Wellness 2,857 SF 1 space per 250 SF 11 - Meeting/Private Dining Space 2,406 SF 1 space per 50 SF 48 - Rooftop Lounge/Bar 3,956 SF 1 space per 80 SF 49 - Semi-Private Pool Deck 6,912 SF 1 space per 80 SF 86 Retail 5,215 SF 1 space per 250 SF 21 Sit-Down Restaurant (incl. outdoor and Pier Ave Right-of-Way)) 5,757 SF 1 space per 100 SF 58 Quick Restaurant 1,348 SF 1 space per 50 SF 27 13th Street (Outdoor Seeting) 844 SF 1 space per 100 SF 8 Total Required - Proposed Uses 472
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016 NOTE: As discussed in the preamble of this memorandum, The City of Hermosa Beach’s Zoning Ordinance does not provide any standards for shared parking and/or unbundled parking. As such, it requires all uses to provide parking as if they are new, independent uses. Despite this, the existence of operating retail/commercial uses on site is relevant to determining the project’s public benefit, since these uses are already theoretically being served by other existing public parking in the area. Therefore, by accommodating parking for these uses on-site, the surrounding parking lots/garages should experience some relief in parking demand, as those cars will now be accommodated on-site with the new project.
Based on the table above, the Strand & Pier’s gross unadjusted parking requirement is 472 parking spaces. City municipal code requirements for individual land uses typically represent a ‘peak demand’ scenario where each use must provide its own parking; City codes do not take into account differences in the hourly variation of parking demand for different uses, nor the seasonality of parking demand for certain uses. In this way, the use of parking demand for stand- alone uses tends to result in a double counting of the recommended number of parking spaces. Additionally, in the case of the Strand & Pier and the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, the inclusion of the 6,912 square foot pool deck area as a separate line item in parking requirements (86 spaces) is unusual, as the pool area typically is considered an ancillary use of the ‘hotel’ and not an additional use.
19
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
SHARED PARKING OVERVIEW
Shared-use parking is a proven practice in which land uses in close proximity share a “pool” of available spaces in order to reduce the overall parking needs for the site. The concept works well and is often relied upon in situations where parking demand for different uses peaks at different times of the day. For example, a hotel and retail/restaurant can share parking effectively because a hotel will experience peak demand during the evening/overnight, while retail and restaurants will experience peak demand during lunchtime and early evenings. Reductions to the parking system are also made based on local factors such as walkability and bikeability, the use of Uber, Lyft and taxis, and transit ridership percentage.
Another consideration for which shared parking accounts is a captive market. A captive market occurs when a user group has already parked in an area for a primary use and then patronizes another establishment without generating any new car trips or parking demand. For example, a restaurant in a hotel may be very busy at breakfast, but is unlikely to generate nearly as many cars as a stand-alone restaurant because most of its business will come from the “captive” market of people who are staying at the hotel. The effects of a captive market vary greatly, depending on the size of the market, the type of commercial space, and the characteristics of surrounding land uses.
For the Project, we anticipate a large drive ratio adjustment for restaurant and retail patrons to account for the large number of patrons already having parked in the surrounding area with the beach as their primary attraction. A drive ratio adjustment is also made for non-captive employees working at the hotel, retail shops and restaurants, to account for alternative modes of transportation, as discussed earlier in the report. A captive adjustment is anticipated for retail, restaurant and hotel ancillary use patrons who are already staying at the hotel.
Walker’s methodology takes into account the number of cars generated by various land-use components and adjusts the “peak demand” to reflect the presence of people parking for that land use at different times of the day. Walker’s model is specific enough to provide a breakdown of parking demand generated by different user groups, weekday versus weekend demand patterns, and the fluctuations in this demand at different times of the year.
For mixed-use developments, the shared use methodology is more appropriate to predict a project’s parking demand over stand-alone City code requirements, which can over calculate demand by assuming that all components of a development generate demand at the same time. If viewed individually, these land uses create an unadjusted parking demand which is typically only applicable for projects that consists of a single land use and are developed in a low density area without driving alternatives.
SHARED PARKING PROJECTIONS FOR STRAND & PIER
20
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
On a typical busy weekend day, the shared parking model projects parking demand to be highest around 8:00 p.m. in August and recommends a parking capacity of 200± spaces to accommodate typical design day conditions (90th percentile conditions). On a typical busy weekday, the model projects parking demand to be highest around 5:00 p.m. in July and recommends a parking capacity of 189± spaces. We note that model’s capacity recommendations generally include a “cushion” or effective supply factor to allow for proper functioning of the parking facility. When constructed, the Strand & Pier site will have a parking supply of approximately 223+ spaces due to the provision of valet parking. Appendix B contains the parking valet operations plan prepared for the Project.
Table 4 summarizes the metrics for each category of proposed land use at the project site used to project parking demand both for the Project. The table also summarizes the base parking generation ratios Walker assigned to each land use in the shared parking models built for this engagement. As noted earlier, the Pool Deck is typically not included as a separate use from the hotel in a typical parking analysis. However, this analysis includes the pool deck in the parking demand calculation, and treats it similarly to a lounge type of use.
21
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27,2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Table 4: Summary of Shared Parking Model Base Generation Ratios
WPC SPM Base Ratio Land Use Weekday Weekend Hotel Uses - Rooms 1.15 Stalls per Key 1.18 Stalls per Key - Lobby/Lounge and Bar 10.00 Stalls per TSF 10.00 Stalls per TSF - Restaurant 10.00 Stalls per TSF 10.00 Stalls per TSF - Spa/Wellness 6.00 Stalls per TSF 6.00 Stalls per TSF - Meeting/Private Dining Space 30.00 Stalls per TSF 30.00 Stalls per TSF - Rooftop Lounge/Bar 10.00 Stalls per TSF 12.00 Stalls per TSF - Pool Deck 10.00 Stalls per TSF 12.00 Stalls per TSF Retail 3.60 Stalls per TSF 4.00 Stalls per TSF Sit Down Restaurants 18.00 Stalls per TSF 20.00 Stalls per TSF Beach Serving/Fast Restaurants 15.00 Stalls per TSF 15.00 Stalls per TSF Note: TSF = Thousand Square Feet
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
Table 5 details the adjustments applied for each land use by user group; hourly and monthly adjustments are not shown as these are proprietary to Walker’s model. The table provides the driving and non-captive ratios used to program the shared parking model. Drive ratios for employees were determined using United States census data for downtown Hermosa Beach, while the drive ratios for patrons were based on the proximity and frequency of transit services, the presence of other large attractions in the immediate vicinity (specifically the beach), the results of the Hermosa Beach Area Use Survey and data supplied by Provenance Hotels and Bolour. The ratios were also informed by Walker’s contemporaneous work on projects in similar beach adjacent locations.
22
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Table 5: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Adjustments
Driving Ratio Non Captive Ratio Land Use Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Beach Retail 40% 40% 40% 40% 90% 90% 90% 90% Employee 71% 71% 71% 71% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sit-Down Restaurant 50% 50% 50% 50% 90% 90% 90% 90% Employee 71% 71% 71% 71% 100% 100% 100% 100% Carry Out/Fast Food 5% 5% 5% 5% 95% 95% 95% 95% Employee 71% 71% 71% 71% 100% 100% 100% 100% Hotel Spa/Salon 80% 80% 60% 60% 25% 25% 25% 25% Employee 71% 71% 71% 71% 100% 100% 100% 100% Hotel 60% 60% 60% 60% 100% 100% 100% 100% Hotel Restaurant/Lounge 40% 40% 25% 25% 50% 50% 50% 50% Hotel Meeting/Banquet Area 80% 80% 80% 80% 100% 70% 100% 70% Hotel Pool Deck/Patio/Rooftop 50% 50% 50% 50% 40% 40% 40% 40% Employee 71% 71% 71% 71% 100% 100% 100% 100% Residential Guest 80% 80% 60% 60% 100% 100% 100% 100% Residential 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Office 80% 80% 60% 60% 100% 100% 100% 100% Employee 71% 71% 71% 71% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
23
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Table 6 summarizes the weekday recommended parking supply at the Strand & Pier. The projections reflect the impact of monthly and hourly factors, and non-captive ratios and drive ratios on unadjusted parking demand.
Table 6: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Projections: Recommended Weekday Parking Supply
Weekday Demand Unadjusted Month Adj Pk Hr Adj Non Captive Drive Ratio July Land Use Demand* July 5:00 PM Evening Evening 5:00 PM Beach Retail 15 100% 95% 90% 40% 5 Employee 4 100% 95% 100% 71% 3 Sit-Down Restaurant 88 98% 75% 90% 50% 29 Employee 16 100% 100% 100% 71% 11 Carry Out/Fast Food 28 98% 60% 95% 5% 1 Employee 5 100% 70% 100% 71% 2 Hotel Spa/Salon 9 100% 100% 25% 80% 2 Employee 9 100% 100% 100% 71% 6 Hotel 90 100% 80% 100% 60% 43 Hotel Restaurant/Lounge 70 100% 30% 50% 40% 4 Hotel Meeting/Banquet Area 72 100% 100% 100% 80% 58 Hotel Pool Deck/Patio/Rooftop 109 100% 60% 40% 50% 13 Employee 25 100% 70% 100% 71% 12 Subtotal Customer/Guest 481 155 Subtotal Employee 59 34 Total Parking Spaces Required 540 189 * Unadjusted demand shows the amount of parking spaces needed if each land use were developed as a stand-alone project in an area with no transit or bicycle/pedestrian opportunities; unadjusted demand does not include adjustments for hourly presences, transit, non- motorized transportation or captive adjustments Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
For weekday conditions, the highest recommended parking supply is 189 parking spaces. This is projected to be needed for conditions in July at 5:00 PM. The proposed project is projected to have the capacity to park 223+ vehicles on site.
Table 7 summarizes the weekend recommended parking supply at the Strand & Pier. The projections reflect the impact of monthly and hourly factors, and non-captive and drive ratios on unadjusted parking demand.
24
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Table 7: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Projections: Recommended Weekend Parking Supply
Weekend Demand Unadjusted Month Adj Pk Hr Adj Non Captive Drive Ratio Aug Land Use Demand* Aug 8:00 PM Evening Evening 8:00 PM Beach Retail 17 95% 65% 90% 40% 4 Employee 4 100% 75% 100% 71% 2 Sit-Down Restaurant 98 99% 100% 90% 50% 44 Employee 17 100% 100% 100% 71% 12 Carry Out/Fast Food 28 99% 50% 95% 5% 1 Employee 5 100% 60% 100% 71% 2 Hotel Spa/Salon 9 100% 0% 25% 60% 0 Employee 9 100% 0% 100% 71% 0 Hotel 100 100% 90% 100% 60% 54 Hotel Restaurant/Lounge 70 100% 90% 50% 25% 8 Hotel Meeting/Banquet Area 72 100% 100% 70% 80% 40 Hotel Pool Deck/Patio/Rooftop 130 100% 100% 40% 50% 26 Employee 18 100% 55% 100% 71% 7 Subtotal Customer/Guest 524 177 Subtotal Employee 53 23 Total Parking Spaces Required 577 200 * Unadjusted demand shows the amount of parking spaces needed if each land use were developed as a stand-alone project in an area with no transit or bicycle/pedestrian opportunities; unadjusted demand does not include adjustments for hourly presences, transit, non- motorized transportation or captive adjustments Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
For weekend conditions, the highest recommended parking supply is 200 parking spaces. This is projected to be needed for conditions in August at 8:00 PM. The proposed project is projected to have the capacity to park 223+ vehicles on site.
Figure 3 shows the projected weekend hourly distribution of the recommended parking supply for various user groups generated by the Strand & Pier project. The shared parking concept is clearly illustrated, showing where the different uses gain efficiency by generating peak demand for parking spaces at different times of the day. Weekday peak recommended supply is shown on Figure but is projected to lower than weekend demand. Therefore, we recommend parking the project based on the weekend projected needs.
25
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Figure 3: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Projections Peak Weekend
200 191 198 196 200 189 167 180 165 159 154 151 153 160 134 140 123 126 115 120 96 96 100 68 80 59 60 40 20 -
Retail Restaurant Hotel (Guests) Hotel (Ancillary Uses) Employees (all) Total
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
Figure 4: Strand & Pier Shared Parking Model Projections Peak Weekday
189 188 200 182 180 177 177 173 180 163 152 160 145 147 142 140 129 114 120 97 103 100 74 80 62 53 60 40 20 -
Retail Restaurant Hotel (Guests) Hotel (Ancillary Uses) Employees (all) Total
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
26
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
COMPARABLE SITE DATA/SHARED PARKING MODEL VALIDATION
COMPARABLE HOTEL PARKING SUPPLY DATA
This section reviews the results of the shared parking analysis in light of available data at twenty- two existing comparable hotels as well as recent approvals of comparable hotels as a check on the recommendations of the shared parking model. Walker and Bolour reviewed available data related to parking and land use at twenty-two luxury hotels along the Southern California coast from Malibu to San Diego, including existing hotels as well as hotels in various stages of entitlement and construction. Table 8 provides information on hotels where parking supply information was available. Key findings were as follows:
• The proposed Project is providing parking at 2.23 spaces per key, a higher rate than all twenty-two hotels on the list. - Mean 1.08 spaces per key - Median 1.04 spaces per key - 50th Percentile 1.05 spaces per key - 85th Percentile 1.43 spaces per key • Based on data from www.walkscore.com, the proposed Project has a higher walkscore than the hotels in the table, with the exception of hotels in Santa Monica. • The proposed Project plans to provide more spaces per key than all the hotels in Santa Monica shown in the Table. • The bulk of the comparable sites also have restaurant and/or retail uses associated with their hotels. Based on the experience of comparable coastal, luxury hotels, the proposed Project is providing enough parking, consistent with Walker’s parking demand analysis. The proposed parking supply for the Strand & Pier hotel is in line with the comparable site data.
27
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Table 8: Comparable Hotel Information
PUBLIC PUBLIC RESTAURANT PARKING SPACES Walk HOTEL NAME ADDRESS CITY # OF KEYS 1 STATUS1 PARKING SPACES / RETAIL IN BALLROOM1 SPACES1 / KEY Score2 ADJACENT1 AVAILABLE1 PROJECT?1 1 Strand & Pier Hotel Pier Ave/The Strand Hermosa Beach 100 EIR 223 2.23 92 Yes 336 Yes Yes; 2,406 sf 2 Monarch Beach Resort 1 Monarch Beach Res Dana Point 400 ACTIVE 800 2.00 53 Yes Yes; 115,000 sf 3 Tower23 723 Felspar St San Diego 44 ACTIVE 85 1.93 87 Yes 4 Shutters 1 Pico Blvd Santa Monica 198 ACTIVE 289 1.46 91 Yes 120 Yes Yes; 8,600 sf 5 Pasea Hotel & Spa 21080 PCH Huntington Beach 250 ACTIVE 359 1.44 70 Yes 1762 Yes Yes; 34,000 sf 6 Marina Del Rey Hotel 13534 Bali Way Marina Del Rey 164 ACTIVE Approx 230 1.40 60 Yes 222 Yes Yes; 9,700 sf 7 Hyatt 21500 PCH Huntington Beach 517 ACTIVE Approx 700 1.35 60 Yes 1762 Yes Yes; 52,000 sf 8 Laguna Cliffs Marriott 25135 Park Lantern Dana Point 378 ACTIVE Approx 450 1.19 51 Yes 46 Yes Yes 9 Lido House Hotel 3300 Newport Blvd Newport Beach 130 ENTITLE / DEMO 148 1.14 84 No 10 Waterfront Beach Resort 21100 PCH Huntington Beach 290 ACTIVE Approx 326 1.12 63 Yes 1762 Yes Yes; 21,500 sf 11 Beach Terrace Inn 2775 Ocean St. Carlsbad 48 ACTIVE 53 1.10 89 No Yes 12 Surf and Sand 1555 S Coast Hwy Laguna Beach 167 ACTIVE Approx 175 1.05 79 Yes Yes; 20,000 13 Beach House 1300 The Strand Hermosa Beach 96 ACTIVE 100 1.04 89 Yes 300 No Yes; 2,200 sf 14 Kimpton Shorebreak Hotel 500 PCH Huntington Beach 157 ACTIVE Approx 160 1.02 84 Yes 505 Yes Yes; 8725 sf 15 Shade Hotel Redondo 655 N Harbor Dr Redondo Beach 54 ACTIVE 53 0.98 73 Yes Yes Yes 16 Casa Del Mar 1910 Ocean Way Santa Monica 129 ACTIVE Approx 125 0.97 91 Yes 120 Yes Yes; 10,750 sf 17 120 Colorado Blvd 120 Colorado Blvd Santa Monica 211 EIR 180 0.85 93 Yes Yes 18 Viceroy Santa Monica 1819 Ocean Ave Santa Monica 162 ACTIVE Approx. 135 0.83 93 Yes 120 Yes Yes 19 Shade Hotel Manhattan 1221 N Valley Dr Manhattan Beach 38 ACTIVE 29 0.76 91 Yes Yes Yes 20 Malibu Beach Inn 22878 PCH Malibu 45 ACTIVE Approx 35 0.78 47 Yes 92 Yes Yes 21 Courtyard by Marriott 1554 5th St Santa Monica 136 ENTITLEMENT 78 0.57 95 Yes Yes 22 Pantai Inn 1003 Coast Blvd La Jolla 30 ACTIVE 14 0.47 86 No No 23 The Georgian Hotel 1415 Ocean Santa Monica 84 ACTIVE Approx. 20-25 0.30 93 Yes 747 Yes Yes; 2,232 sf Mean 1.08 Median 1.04 For Twenty-Two 50th Percentile 1.05 Comparable Sites 85th Percentile 1.43 Source: 1 = Bolour, 2016 2 = www.walkscore.com, accessed 10/28/2016
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
28
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
COMPARABLE HOTEL PARKING DEMAND DATA
Having validated the proposed Strand & Pier project’s parking supply based on comparable hotel parking supply data from twenty-two coastal hotels in Southern California, the next parking model validation step deals with parking demand, to verify that parking is functioning as intended. To complete the demand validation, Fehr & Peers collected parking demand data at three of the comparable hotels, those in closest proximity to the proposed Strand & Pier hotel, on one weekday and one Saturday in November 2016 (Parking Utilization in Downtown Hermosa Beach and at Select Hotels, Fehr & Peers, December 8, 2016). Walker has analyzed the data provided by Fehr & Peers and find that is corroborates and validates the shared parking model output for the proposed hotel and its ancillary uses during the projected weekend peak period of parking demand. Operationally, the Shade hotels are closer comparables to the Strand & Pier as they are full service hotels with lounge/bar areas, a restaurant/bar, pool/pool deck and spa. The Beach House is not a full service hotel as it offers a continental breakfast and an afternoon ‘happy hour’ for guests, but otherwise has no dining/drinking facilities, has no pool/deck and no spa. It is Walker’s professional opinion that drive-in ratios may be higher for a limited service hotel as patrons have to go off-site for amenities, and may be more inclined to bring a vehicle and go further afield. The Shade hotels and proposed Strand & Pier can offer more of an ‘urban resort’ experience to patrons who may be seeking one. The collected parking data at both Shade hotels encompasses the site, capturing parking demand for both the hotel rooms and the ancillary hotel uses. Table 9 compares the parking demand per occupied room at these properties during the peak to the shard parking model output for the proposed Strand & Pier, including its ancillary uses (the hotel rooms, lobby lounge/bar, hotel restaurant and pool deck) to provide an apples-to-apples comparison. The model output associated with the meeting rooms was not included in the comparison as the Fehr & Peers study indicated that neither Shade hotel had events associated with its banquet facilities the day of the counts.
29
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
Table 9: Observed Weekend Parking Demand at Comparable Hotels
Property 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM Observed Parking Demand per Occupied Room for Hotel & Anciallary Uses1 Beach House 0.75 0.77 0.72 0.76 0.83 0.84 Shade - Manhattan 0.59 0.57 0.49 0.57 0.59 0.59 Shade - Redondo 0.65 0.87 1.02 1.00 0.78 0.70 Projected Parking Demand per Occupied Room for Hotel and Ancillary Uses2 Strand & Pier SPM Output 0.77 0.89 0.92 0.95 0.92 0.84
Note: Ratios shown are spaces per occupied room 1: Source = Fehr & Peers (December 8, 2016)
2: Source: Strand & Pier Project Shared Parking Analysis (Walker Parking Consultants January 9, 2017) Includes Hotel, Hotel Restaurant/Lounge, Hotel Pool Deck/Patio and Hotel Employee output. Excludes Hotel Meeting Rooms and Hotel Spa output Source: Fehr & Peers, 2016, Walker Parking Consultants, 2017
The shared parking model built for this analysis is projecting a per room hotel/hotel ancillary parking demand for Strand & Pier comparable to the actual demand Shade Redondo experienced the evening of the counts (5-10% below that of Shade Redondo during the 7:00 and 8:00 PM hours, higher than Shade Redondo during the ‘shoulder’ hours) and much higher than the observed parking demand at Shade Manhattan. The projected parking demand is also above that of the observed demand at the less comparable Beach House. The mode output presented in the analysis is validated by this data. In terms of neighborhood and transportation characteristics, Shade Manhattan is a better comparable than Shade Redondo based on Walkscores: Shade Manhattan: 91, Strand & Pier location: 92, Beach House: 89, Shade Redondo: 73, and as we go further down the coast the distance from Los Angeles International Airport increases; in this regard the Strand & Pier lies somewhere between Shade Manhattan and Shade Redondo). For these reasons, we feel the model projecting slightly less peak parking demand per room than Shade Redondo is appropriate.
30
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
JULY 27, 2017 PROJECT 37-8536.04
FINAL SHARED-USE PARKING RECOMMENDATION
Based on Walker’s model and the adjustments and assumptions discussed above, the shared parking model project’s the need for a 200+ space parking supply at the Strand & Pier to satisfy the parking needs of the development. The project is proposing 223+ on-site parking spaces through valet parking, and approximately 180 public and valet bicycle parking spaces.
The proposed parking supply is more than sufficient to accommodate the parking demand generated on the site.
The proposed project is removing several existing uses that rely solely on public parking to accommodate their parking demand. Since the proposed project plans to accommodate parking demand from all its proposed uses on site, the result will be a public benefit in the form of decreased on- and off-street public parking demand related to the removal of the existing uses which rely in part on public parking.
Regarding concerns expressed that pricing or other policies could deter use of the parking spaces contained within the onsite garage serving the proposed project, our experience suggests that, as a private firm, the hotel’s goal will be to maximize parking revenue, thereby capturing as much parking demand for the site as possible.
31
APPENDIX A – PROPOSED PARKING PRICING AND VALIDATION STRUCTURE
A-1
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX A: PARKING PRICING AND VALIDATION STRUCTURE
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
PRICING AND VALIDATION PROGRAM
Bolour Associates, developer of the Pier and Strand Hotel, has proposed the following parking pricing structure for spaces on the site:
• Overnight parking fee for hotel guests and visitors: $36
• Validated hourly parking rates: $10 for first four hours, $5 per hour above four hours, with a daily maximum of $36.
• Non-validated hourly rates: $10 for first hour, $2 per each half hour above the first hour, with a daily maximum parking fee of $36.
Many of the comparable coastal hotel parking rate structures that were reviewed did not distinguish between an overnight guest or an overnight visitor. Bolour therefore proposes to keep these rates the same.
With the unvalidated rate structure, while a premium is charged for the first hour, as the length of time parked increases, the rates become more competitive with the nearby public parking garage. In this way, the hotel garage makes itself accommodating to all day visitors while the City’s parking garage would facilitate in and out and shorter term stays.
A-2
APPENDIX B – PARKING VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
A-1
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
Walker has provided the following, preliminary operational methodology for operating the planned valet parking operation in the proposed Strand and Pier Project, based on the following assumptions:
Bolour plans to develop a mixed-use boutique hotel (approximately 100 keys) along the Strand in the City of Hermosa Beach. The development will include retail, restaurant, and event uses, many of them similar to uses which currently exist on the site and which will be removed to make way for the proposed project. Per the City of Hermosa Beach's municipal code, Bolour is required to provide ±386 parking spaces. Bolour is requesting a comprehensive Parking Plan pursuant to section 17.44.210 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code, and plans to provide 178 parking spaces.
In order to successfully develop its desired program, Bolour must size its structure (number of parking spaces provided) correctly considering the following criteria:
• The “design day" peak demand for programmed uses contained within the planned development • Opportunities to share parking given different hours of peak parking demand possibly experienced by different user groups; • Preparation of a shared parking analysis to inform and support Bolour's Parking Plan submittal to the City.
Bolour must also maximize the efficiency of the operation of the planned parking structure.
As Walker does not control the quality of labor, materials, equipment, methods of operation, or services furnished by others, or market conditions, any opinions rendered as to operation, including but not limited to opinions as to the efficiency of the garage layout are made on the basis of our experience and represent our judgement as experienced and qualified professionals, familiar with the industry. Walker cannot and does not guarantee the performance of others. All recommendations should be considered in whole.
METHODOLOGY
In accordance with the scope of services and based upon additional information provided by Bolour Associates, Walker reviewed the following documents as part of our analysis:
A. Site Plans, and Reference Plans for the Strand and Pier Parking Facility B. Walker/ULI Shared Parking Model
OVERVIEW
Valet operations are best employed in settings in which an enhanced level of service is desired, or in parking operations in which an owner needs to optimize use of limited parking capacity. B-2
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
True valet parking is defined by the parking patrons' use of a single drop off and pick up point for their vehicles. This site is referred to as the Porte Cochere, a French term describing a porch large enough for a carriage to pass through. However, in valet parking it refers both to the spot where patrons claim their vehicles, often a podium, and to the vehicle staging area in the vicinity. A Porte Cochere can have several lanes for both traffic and parking.
Valet parking is often confused with an “attendant assist” operation. Attendant assist parking is utilized in facilities where there is no single drop off point; instead, parkers will self-park their vehicle in the drive aisle as directed by the attendant and then allow the attendants access to their vehicles’ keys. This enables the attendants to have the ability to move vehicles as needed to allow patrons, whose vehicles are blocked to exit. Attendants are stationed throughout the facility, without regard to a single drop off area. Attendant assist is recommended when there is an opportunity to increase capacity by utilizing the aisles for additional parking.
Given the capacity of the garage, Walker recommends implementing a full valet operation with a Porte Cochere at grade near the entrance of the hotel with only valet attendants accessing the interior of the parking facility.
By eliminating public access to the garage, valets can also implement a hybrid aisle parking method of operation in areas in which aisle widths can accommodate additional vehicles. Keys for aisle parked cars which are blocking vehicles in marked stalls can be kept either in the central Porte Cochere area or scattered throughout the parking levels in locked storage boxes.
The valet dedicated section can accommodate aisle parking at a rate of approximately one aisle car parked for every three marked stalls. Aisle parked cars may be shifted either forward or reverse in the aisle to release the vehicles located perpendicularly in marked stalls along each aisle. Aisle parked cars can be locked and secured after each use in the aisle in which they were originally located or parked in vacated marked stalls as capacities allow. Tandem stalls may serve aisle parking as the valets will have access to all valeted cars on each parking level.
The following sections detail Walker’s recommendations on how the valet operation should function. All stack parked vehicles shown in the following drawings are either compact, indicated with a “C,” or standard size cars, indicated with an “S.” The typical dimensions for each vehicle type are illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure B- 1: Compact and Standard Typical Vehicle Dimensions
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016 B-3
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
Based on these dimensions, Walker projects the Strand and Pier hotel could likely accommodate the following vehicle counts on each of the garage’s subterranean levels via aisle parking.
Table B- 1: Proposed Aisle Parking Count
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016
The ±45 vehicles accommodated via aisle parking, combined with the 178 marked stalls in the garage, create a total capacity of 223+ vehicles in the garage. Walker notes that the total number of cars which can park in the facility is a function of vehicle size and valet efficiency. If all guests drive compacts, more cars can likely park. Conversely, if all guests drive SUVs or trucks, less cars could likely fit in the garage.
PORTE COCHERE AND RECEPTION
A Porte Cochere is typically placed at the most convenient spot for patrons both to leave their vehicle and gain access to their destination, and then, when their business has concluded, to return to claim their vehicle. In the case of Strand and Pier’s hotel and restaurants, the Porte Cochere is located adjacent to the lobby reception door which leads to Beach Drive and 13th Street.
Guests drive into the Porte Cochere’s valet reception area, or driveway, and are greeted by a valet who directs them to pull as far forward into the staging area as possible to keep vehicles off of the street. A claim check is handed to each patron when dropping off his or her vehicle. This claim check should have a unique, pre-printed number that corresponds to the portions of the ticket that goes with the vehicle. The claim check should have an area where the valet can note pre-existing damage. Whenever possible, each vehicle should be visibly inspected for damage while the patron is dropping it off. Damage should be noted, both verbally to the customer and on the ticket. Figure 2 below details the valet operation for the Porte Cochere area in the northern exterior of the lobby level. There is likely queueing space for approximately ten cars to be staged in the valet Porte Cochere.
B-4
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
Figure B- 2: Proposed Porte Cochere
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016
Based on typical standard car dimensions, it is likely that up to ten cars at a time may be staged in the Porte Cochere area until there is not enough room to stage any more inbound vehicles. The eleventh car to arrive would have to be taken into the garage to be parked. Often the dedicated valet employee who is assigned to monitor activity in the driveway, who is commonly referred to as the greeter, will move cars forward in a chain like fashion as valets park the staged inbound vehicles located along the chain closer to the entrance of the garage. This method of operation serves two functions, 1) there is always an attendant available to greet and assist guests at the entrance to the hotel, and 2) vehicle movement is constant which allows additional guests to park and access the hotel.
LEVEL B1
Once a valet gets into a vehicle staged on the driveway, she will proceed down to the B1 parking level to find an appropriate parking stall. Guests who are short term parkers should be parked on the B1 level. Figure 3 below details the valet and aisle parking operation for the B1 level.
B-5
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
Figure B- 3: Proposed B1 Parking
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016
Depending on which side of the parking level the valet ultimately parks the vehicle, there are two stairwells which will return the valet to the Porte Cochere area. One stairwell on the southeastern corner of each level which exits onto 13th Court at grade and one stairwell on the northeastern corner of each level which exits directly onto the valet driveway at grade. Each of the stairwells is located within an exit corridor with access to each level of the garage. Valet use of stairwells to enter and exit the garage will be faster and safer then circulating up the garage drive aisles.
LEVEL B3
If B1 is full, valets will proceed down to the B2 parking level to find an appropriate parking stall. Guests who are long term parkers should be parked on the B2 level as well. Whenever possible, valets should back vehicles into spaces. This practice allows retrieving valets, who are usually more rushed, to be able to look forward as they leave the parking space, which is much safer than backing out. As many vehicles are equipped with automatic locking devices, it is advisable to teach valets always to remove keys before closing the doors of the vehicle. Radio volumes should be lowered and then the radio turned off so that the retracting antennas will lower. The purpose of lowering the volume is to avoid startling customers when they turn on the radio after B-6
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04 claiming their vehicle. Figure 4 below details the valet and aisle parking operation for the B2 level.
Figure B- 2: Proposed B2 Parking
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016
Valet access to B2 from the Porte Cochere and pedestrian return to the Porte Cochere from the garage will be through the same two stairwells which serve B1.
VEHICLE RETURN
Today’s parking equipment come with interfaces that allow hotel valet operations the ability to attach charges directly to a guest’s room before they’ve even checked in at the front desk. There is also equipment on the market that will take digital photos of all four sides of a vehicle as it is being brought into and out of the parking garage, allowing the valet operator to have irrefutable proof of pre-existing damage to a vehicle. Some hotels have kiosks in the lobby with which a guest can arrange, by touch screen, to have their vehicle retrieved and waiting for them.
At a minimum, guests can call down from their room to the front desk or valet stand, or even text ahead from anywhere on property, to request their car. With a stack parking operation, training guests to requests their vehicle in advance of arriving on the valet driveway will be a key component of labor management and guest satisfaction. Under optimal conditions, valets should be able to park a car, retrieve a car, and return to the Porte Cochere within five minutes. B-7
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
Upon bringing a customer’s vehicle to the Porte Cochere, valet attendants should turn off the lights, shut off the ignition and remove the keys. They should then wait by the vehicle with the driver’s door opened. As the customer approaches the vehicle, the valet should help them into the seat, verify the claim ticket (by matching the number to the identifying number on the other portion of the ticket that was retained with the vehicle), and hand the keys to the customer. This is done so that the customer does not inadvertently turn the ignition key to an already idling vehicle, causing ignition damage.
STAFFING SCHEDULE
Valet parking is labor intensive and the largest line item on any valet operation pro forma budget will be labor cost. It is thus crucial to the success of the operation that the staffing level be appropriate. There should always be someone assigned to greet the arriving vehicles, open the vehicles’ doors, and hand over the claim ticket to the patron.
This task can be accomplished by rotating valet attendants. In addition, there should always be someone assigned to the Porte Cochere whose duty it is to meet the departing patrons and take their claim tickets. This person is responsible for beginning the vehicle retrieval process and collecting any charges associated with the valet parking. Finally there is the position of valet attendant, whose responsibility it is to park and retrieve patrons’ vehicles. This is the position that requires the greatest attention in planning and scheduling.
Scheduling valet attendants should be based on the following two factors: ▪ Hourly activity levels for both arriving and departing patrons; ▪ Time needed to park and to retrieve vehicles.
Typical staffing will likely be one valet overnight, one greeter and one valet during the morning shift, and one greeter and one valet during the evening shift. Table 2 below provides a recommended event staffing plan based on the assumption that two valets can handle up to thirty vehicles over a staggered event entrance and exit.
Table B- 2: Recommended Event Staffing Schedule
Valets Required # of Valeted Cars 2 0 - 30 3 31 - 50 4 51 - 80 5 81 - 110 6 111 - 150 7 151 - 175 8 176 - 200 9 201 - 225 10 225+
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016 B-8
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
VALET LEVEL OF SERVICE
Establishing and evaluating valet parking operations can be accomplished by determining the goals of the valet system and establishing an expectable Level of Service (“LOS”). To establish the LOS standards, Walker’s team of former valet operators developed the LOS approach based on experience in operating valet operations for hotels, restaurants, and event venues.
The LOS approach is adopted from a classification system used to evaluate roadways. LOS “A” represents the highest standard, LOS “B” represents less than the highest but good, LOS “C” represents standard service, LOS “D” represents less than standard, and LOS “F” represents un- satisfactory service.
The level of service (LOS) for a valet parking operation is measured based on patron wait time. At its core, valet parking is a service more than anything else. From the initial greeting to the final delivery of the vehicle, the customer must be made to feel that they are important, welcome, and treated with respect. By measuring the wait time, the time the customer spends waiting once the claim check is handed to the valet to the time the vehicle is delivered, we can measure the level of service. This measured level of service is accurate provided that the other steps in customer service are followed. This means that the valets must also be polite, in clean uniforms, well groomed, professional and courteous. Even with a LOS time A, if the other steps are not met, the patron may be dissatisfied. Table 3 provides the wait time LOS ratings.
Table B- 3: Valet Level of Service (LOS)
1 From presentation of claim ticket to return of vehicle to pick-up point
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016
B-9
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX B: VALET OPERATIONS PLAN
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
APPENDIX C – TRANSPORTATION NETWORKED COMPANIES (TNC’S)
OBSERVATIONS AND DATA
C-1
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX C: TNC OBSERVATIONS & DATA
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
POSSIBLE IMPACTS OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORKED COMPANIES
While parking and transportation planners continue to project parking demand in a static manner, the way people are traveling in Los Angeles only recently has begun changing dramatically. Although rideshare companies Uber and Lyft view demand and usage data as highly proprietary, we know that the growth in use of the services has been more than 1000% in just the past four years.
For some land uses more than others, the demand for parking spaces has been reduced as a result.27 Greater changes are likely in store as self-driving vehicles (SDVs) become part of the system, in some cases in tandem with ridesharing companies, who are some of the largest investors and aggressive implementers of the technology.28 They are already on the road in cities such as Mountain View, CA and Pittsburgh, PA.
Photograph C- 1: Self-Driving Vehicle, Mountain View, California, October 2016
Photo Credit: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016
Based on our work in parking structure design and planning, Walker pays close attention to these trends. While overall we have seen little consensus among the experts in research and business about extent to which parking demand will be reduced by these trends, the overall consensus appears to be a reduction in parking demand in the future.
27http://www.latimes.com/socal/burbank-leader/news/tn-gnp-bob-hope-airport-uber-lyft-20151106- story.html
28 http://sfist.com/2016/08/18/uber_otto_driverless_pitssburgh.php
C-2
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX C: TNC OBSERVATIONS & DATA
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
The dramatic changes caused by technology make flexibility an important goal to keep in mind particularly when sizing a fifty-year capital investment such as a parking structure. Some municipalities are keeping such policy decisions in mind. The City of Summit, New Jersey recent has foregone construction of a public parking structure in lieu of providing a stipend for Uber rides.29 Developers of residential properties have made similar strategic plans.30
The impact of rideshare vehicles were not explicitly factored into our parking demand projections; however, we suggest that their growing popularity is likely to lower parking demand in the future and should be kept in mind. We therefore gathered some rideshare data to reflect this trend. The following is a sampling of data that we have collected that is relevant to these impacts for the Project.
IMPACT ON PARKING DEMAND
One proxy for TNC’s negative impact on parking demand for travel-related land uses is the reduction in rental car business. Rental cars, used almost exclusively by hotel guests and other travelers, are increasingly being passed over for the greater convenience, door-to-door service, and often reduced cost of TNCs. The impact has only increased with the growth in the use of TNCS since some data began reflecting the trend one to two years ago. The use of rental cars was found to drop 10% in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the first quarter of 2015.31
Parking operators who serve the hotel industry are also observing the trend. Walker posed the question of the impact of Uber and Lyft on parking demand to the Regional Vice President of a nationwide parking company, active in Los Angeles County. The parking executive stated the following observations:
In a nut shell this has been a huge impact nationwide but % varies by city, sub market and hotel type. I can tell you for LA overnight drive in rates are down 3 to 8% and transient drive in rate is down 20%.32
Walker requested parking data from Provenance hotel, the proposed operator of the project, regarding its experience regarding parking demand. The following data was provided. For hotels in its walkable markets in Seattle and Portland, the number of guests requiring parking experienced a material reduction.
29 http://fortune.com/2016/10/04/new-jersey-uber/
30http://www.sustainablebrands.com/news_and_views/collaboration/sustainable_brands/uber_partners _sf_real_estate_developer_incentivize_r
31https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/04/21/uber-lyft-hammer-cabs-car-rentals-business- travel/83277332/
32 Email with Regional Vice President, Parking Operations Company in Los Angeles, Friday, August 19, 2016 12:12 PM. C-3
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX C: TNC OBSERVATIONS & DATA
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
Table C- 1: Drive in Percentages Observed for Hotel Guests in the Following Markets
Drive in rates by percentage of guests Year Seattle San Diego Portland 2016 19% 35% 32% 2015 21% 33% 34% 2014 22% 38% 34% 2013 21% 34%
Reduction over four years 10.7% -3% 6.2%
Source: Bolour Associates and Provenance Hotels, 2016
DEMAND FOR RIDESHARE FOR AUXILIARY USES
Walker collected data to measure the TNC mode split for restaurants, bars, and retail establishments in the general commercial district as well. On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 5:30 PM, the hour of peak parking demand for the site projected by the Model, Walker sought to test our hypothesis that the location of the Strand and Pier Project was being heavily served by rideshare services Uber and Lyft. Aside from anecdotal evidence, including a Walker staff member who lives adjacent the site, without a car, and relies solely on the ridesharing services and public transit for transportation, we sought to collect actual data.
We subsequently collected one full day of data on the following Friday. The results of the data collection are shown in Table AC2 below. Walker staff visually identified and counted thirty-four drop offs by rideshare firms within the peak period on Friday August 19th. Observations the following week were significantly lower but still material.
C-4
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX C: TNC OBSERVATIONS & DATA
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
Table C- 2: Rideshare (Uber and Lyft) Observed Service. Pier and Hermosa Avenues in Hermosa Beach
Friday 12:00 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM August 26, PM – – 2:00 – 3:00 – 4:00 – 5:00 – 6:00 – 7:00 – 8:00 2016 1:00 PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Pick Up 6 5 2 4 6 11 7 12 Drop-off 2 5 6 2 7 13 14 10 Roaming 10 6 6 5 8 14 12 12 Total 18 16 14 10 21 32 33 32
Friday August 19, 5:30 PM - 2016 6:30 PM Pick Up 8 Drop-off 34 Roaming 23 Total 65 Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2016
We conclude from our data collection, including drop off data for hotel and non-hotel uses, review of hotel data, communication with parking operators, our experience in the industry and review of trends in the press that the trend toward the use of rideshare companies, and potentially self-driving vehicles in the future, is likely to reduce parking demand at the project site beyond what can be reasonably be projected today, during projected peak hours for parking demand.
C-5
STRAND AND PIER PROJECT APPENDIX C: TNC OBSERVATIONS & DATA
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
APPENDIX D – SHARED PARKING MODEL VALIDATION
D-1
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT APPENDIX D: SHARED PARKING MODEL VALIDATION
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
VALIDATION OF SHARED PARKING MODEL METHODOLOGY AND RATIOS FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS
The committee updating Shared Parking conducted a series of 13 case studies to verify that the shared parking model is reasonably accurate. These studies were conducted at a variety of shopping centers in California, Arizona, Ohio, Florida, and Virginia. The centers studied varied in size from 48,566 sf to 1,274,700 sf.
Eight of the thirteen case studies were on shopping centers in southern California. The size of these centers, their respective mix of land uses and the ratio of estimated demand/observed occupancy is shown in the following table. In most cases, the shared parking model estimated the parking demand within a few percent or in the case of the Long Beach Town Centre, over projected the number of spaces necessary. In two cases, the shared parking model under- projected the parking demand; however, in the case of The Block at Orange, the under projection did not occur during a peak month, and the committee believes that “the monthly variation at this center was significantly lower than normal . . . the ‘valleys’ in the monthly variation of parking demand seem less deep than those commonly seen.”
Table D- 1: Shared Parking Southern California Case Studies
Estimated Demand/ Observed Occupancy Size Enter- Weekday Weekend Case N ame (ksf) Retail Dining tainment Office Other Day Evening Day Evening
1 Puente Hills Mall 1,190 87% 5% 7% - - - - 1.11 1.09 2 Fashion Island 1,174 88% 10% 2% - - - - 0.96 1.06 4 Long Beach Towne Center 832 77% 9% 15% - - - - 1.44 1.23 5 Covina Town Square 381 61% 10% 29% - - - - - 1.06 6 Burbank Empire 614 92% 7% - 1% - - - 1.04 - 7 Westfield Promenade 546 81% 8% 10% - - - - - 1.04 9 Irvine Spectrum, 2002 797 7% 13% 35% 45% - 1.19 1.30 1.15 0.96 Irvine Spectrum, 2003 1,274 24% 11% 20% 45% - 1.19 1.46 0.92 0.82 12 Block at Orange1 1,175 40% 20% 20% 32% 3% 0.93 0.82 0.87 0.64
SDCC 1,764 - - - - -
1. Other is Health Club 2. Other includes Hotel (9%), Residential (32%) and Health Club (2%) Source: Shared Parking, ULI, 2005.
Several of the case studies for centers that were near reasonable transit options were prepared with a uniform mode adjustment of 90%-95%, for all visitors and employees. The Block at Orange, for example, was initially prepared assuming a mode adjustment of 90%.
In planning for the parking demand at any facility, the parking demand ratios are obtained (where available) from data provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Parking Generation (3rd edition, 2004.). Parking Generation provides the Average Peak Period Parking Demand, the 85th Percentile Parking Demand, and the 33rd Percentile Parking Demand. As with traffic, traffic engineers and parking consultants generally consider the 85th percentile demand
D-2
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT APPENDIX D: SHARED PARKING MODEL VALIDATION
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04 to represent the target that will best serve communities and developers. As these parking ratios are based on statistical data, there will be some facilities that outperform others, resulting in higher parking demand. The committee responsible for the update to Shared Parking didn’t consider the variations in parking demand to invalidate the parking model, but rather “are more indicative of the strength of tenants in a particular marketplace…”.
D-2
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT APPENDIX E: COASTAL CALIFORNIA HOTELS PAID PARKING POLICIES
JUNE, 2017 37-8536.04
APPENDIX E: PARKING PRICING POLICIES FOR 41 COASTAL HOTELS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
E-1
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT APPENDIX E: COASTAL CALIFORNIA HOTELS PAID PARKING POLICIES
JUNE, 2017 37-8536.04
Bolour Associates provided Walker with a survey of data for 41 hotels located in coastal Southern California. Parking pricing data was found for 37 of the hotels. The data demonstrated that 32 of the 37 hotels charged for parking. The price of parking for hotel guests generally ranged from $30.00 to $40.00 per night, with the lowest price observed to be $20.00 per night and the highest price observed to be $45.00 per night. The following table shows the parking pricing data for coastal hotels that was collected.
E-2
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT APPENDIX E: COASTAL CALIFORNIA HOTELS PAID PARKING POLICIES
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
Table E-1: Parking Pricing for Southern California Coastal Hotels Number for HOTEL NAME # OF KEYS LOCATION VISITOR PARKING RATE OVERNIGHT RATE GUESTS OVERNIGHT RATE VISITORS GUEST RATE* VALET Reference Sat/Sun: $20 ($10 with validation); M-F: $10: $5 with 1 Terranea 582 Rancho Palos Verdes $38 $38 $38/night Yes validation
2 Beach Terrace Inn 48 Carlsbad Free free free Free No
3 Laguna Cliffs Marriott 378 Dana Point $20/day up to 4 hours. Then goes to $37 $37 $37 $37 Only Free self parking; Valet: $16 daily and complimentary Self Parking: Free; $40 4 Monarch Beach Resort 400 Dana Point Free self parking; $40 valet $40 Yes with validation valet $5/hour, $35 max; 3 hours complimentary with 5 L'Auberge Del Mar 121 Del Mar $35 $35 $35 Only validation
6 Beach House 96 Hermosa Beach $10 for first hour; $4 for each 1/2 hour after. $20 max. $25 $25 $25/night Only
$7 for first 3 hours with validation. $25 for first 3 hours 7 Pasea Hotel & Spa 250 Huntington Beach $35 $35 $35/day Only w/out validation. After 3 hours, $50 all day Valet: $6 for first 2 hours; $2 for every 20 minutes after. 8 Kimpton Shorebreak Hotel 157 Huntington Beach $22 max. Goes to $35 for overnight. Self Park is $35 valet, $40 self $40 self $35/night Yes $40/night $20/day for visitors. With validation, four hours for free, 9 Hyatt 517 Huntington Beach $36 $36 $36/day Only then goes to $20. $15 daily; With validation, first three hours is $3, then 10 Waterfront Beach Resort 290 Huntington Beach $34 $34 $34 Only jumps to $15 11 Pantai Inn 30 La Jolla Free Free free Free No
12 La Valencia 114 La Jolla $10 daily $30 $30 $30 Only
13 Surf and Sand 167 Laguna Beach $20/day. Goes to $30 if it goes overnight $30 $30 $30 Only
14 Montage Laguna Beach 250 Laguna Beach $15/day with validation. $40/day without validation $40/night $40 $40/night Only
15 Capri Laguna 45 Laguna Beach N/A Free N/A Free No
16 The Inn at Laguna Beach 70 Laguna Beach N/A Free N/A Free No $25 flat for up to 12 hours, then goes to $40. $5 for the 17 Ritz Carlton Laguna Niguel 396 Dana Point $40 $40 $40/night Only first 12 hours with validation Validation: $10 for first 3 hours./ Then $5 for every 15 18 Malibu Beach Inn 45 Malibu minutes after 3 hours; $35 max. without validation, $35/night $35 $35/night Only $35 flat 19 Shade Hotel - Manhattan Beach 38 Manhattan Beach $8 under 3 hours w/ validation. $11 under 3 hours $25/night $25 $25/night Only $40 with in and out 20 Ritz Carlton Marina Del Rey 304 Marina Del Rey $12 for first 3 hours, $3 after, $40 max $40 $40 Only privilege Source: Bolour Associates, 2016
E-3
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT APPENDIX E: COASTAL CALIFORNIA HOTELS PAID PARKING POLICIES
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
Table E-2: Parking Pricing for Southern California Coastal Hotels (Continued)
Number for HOTEL NAME # OF KEYS LOCATION VISITOR PARKING RATE OVERNIGHT RATE GUESTS OVERNIGHT RATE VISITORS GUEST RATE* VALET Reference
21 Marina Del Rey Marriott 370 Marina Del Rey $10 for first two hours, $4 every hour after, $37 max $37 $37 $37/night Only
22 Marina Del Rey Hotel 164 Marina Del Rey $4 daily with validation; $10 without; $30 overnight $30 overnight $30 $30 Only
23 Doryman's Newport Beach Hotel 10 Newport Beach None Free None Free No Self: $3/hour, $10 daily. Valet: $5/hour, $15 daily, $30 24 Balboa Bay Resort 159 Newport Beach $20 self park, $30 valet $20 self park, $30 valet $20 self park, $30 valet Yes overnight
25 Portofino Hotel & Marina 161 Redondo Beach $5 $27 None $27/day Both
26 Tower23 44 San Diego $10/hr; $30 max $25/night $30 max $25/night Only $13 for first hour, $7 each additional, $45 max. $9 for 27 Loews 347 Santa Monica $45 $45 $45/day Only first 3 hours with validation. 28 JW Mariott 173 Santa Monica $10 for first hour; $3 each 30 mins; $40 max $40 $40 40/night Only $46/day with In and out 29 Fairmont Miramar Hotel** 280 Santa Monica $18 For first hour, $7 for each additional hour, $46 max $46 (Valet) $46 (Valet) Only privileges
30 The Georgian Hotel 84 Santa Monica $9 flat $28 $28 $28 Only
31 Hotel Shangri-la 71 Santa Monica $12 for first hour, $8 for each additional hour $42 $42 $42 Only
32 Ocean View Hotel 66 Santa Monica Self Parking: $15-20 flat (depending on the day) $33, Valet $33, Self $33/night Only Self Park: $12 (weekday) $15 (weekend) for under 3 33 Shore Hotel 164 Santa Monica $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 Yes hours, $23 for 3-6 hours; $35 for more than 6 hours. $16 for first hour; $10 for every hour after; $45 max. 34 Viceroy Santa Monica 162 Santa Monica $45 $45 $45/night Only Validation gets $7 for first 2 hours 35 Shutters 198 Santa Monica $12 for first hour; $2 every half hour after; $45 max $45 $45 $45/night Only $45/night with in and out 36 Casa Del Mar 129 Santa Monica $12/hour, $2 for each 30 minutes after, $45 Max $45 $45 Only privileges 90 minutes free with validation, then goes to $15 flat. 37 Hotel Erwin 119 Venice $38 $38 $38/night Only $5 per additional hour, with $38 max
Source: Bolour Associates, 2016 E-4
STRAND AND PIER HOTEL PROJECT APPENDIX E: COASTAL CALIFORNIA HOTELS PAID PARKING POLICIES
JULY 27, 2017 37-8536.04
E-5