2 0 0 7 a N N U a L R E P O

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2 0 0 7 a N N U a L R E P O Alaska Air Group 2007 Annual Report P.O. Box 68947 • Seattle, WA 98168-0947 www.alaskaair.com www.horizonair.com Alaska Airlines Reservations Horizon Air Reservations 1-800-ALASKAAIR (252-7522) 1-800-547-9308 2 0 0 7 AN N U A L RE P O R T 2007 marked not only Alaska’s 75th anniversary but the passing of Alaska Air Group’s former Chairman and CEO and long-time board member Bruce Kennedy. Bruce led Alaska as CEO from 1979 to 1991 and helped build the company into what it is today. He stepped down as chairman and CEO to serve others through missionary and humanitarian work. Later, he devoted his talents to helping produce a new airplane specially designed to serve people in remote parts of the world. He left behind a great legacy – not only through his leadership and contributions to the Alaska Air Group companies, but through his generous service to others, Bruce R. Kennedy which has left its mark on all who were privileged to know him. We will miss you, Bruce. Alaska Air Group 2007 Annual Report We promise to provide an exceptional customer experience that is safe, dependable and delivered with genuine and caring service. — Our customer promise To Our Stockholders Living up to our promises — something we all learned when we were young — seems to get more complicated as we grow up. But regardless of how difficult it becomes, keeping promises is essential to the success of any business — especially to ours. Our strategic plans at Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air revolve around living up to our promises to all our stakeholders. When Bill Ayer, Chairman and CEO customers buy tickets on our airlines, they expect us to get them where they want to go gatherings, employees forced to change major safely, on time and with their bags. Our life plans because they lost a portion of their employees trust us to provide good jobs with fair, hard-earned retirement incomes, and market-based compensation and to make good stockholders who lost their investments — on our retirement funding obligations. And we excuses simply don’t matter. believe there is an implicit, if not explicit, promise to provide investors a reasonable return While some things, such as soaring fuel prices over the long term. Keeping these core promises and a sluggish economy, are out of our direct is foundational to our future success. control, we decide how we’re going to respond to circumstances that present themselves. And it’s But let’s be frank. We haven’t always delivered. the sum of those decisions that determines our ultimate success or failure over the long term. Our industry as a whole has struggled and some airlines have outright failed to live up to their Let’s look at how we performed in 2007 and promises over the past few years. There are what we’re doing in 2008 to better position plenty of excuses to go around, but to customers ourselves to live up to our promises. who missed important meetings or family 1 Financial Results last year while Horizon contributed about 20 percent.) At $92.3 million, or $2.28 per diluted share, Alaska Air Group’s 2007 adjusted net income fell short of our plan and lagged our 2006 results. Alaska Airlines Unit Costs The primary reason was the significant rise in the 9.0¢ cost of fuel combined with our inability to pass 8.73¢ along those added costs through higher fares in 8.52¢ 8.5¢ the current competitive and economic 8.34¢ environment. 8.0¢ 7.92¢ 7.90¢* 7.75¢* 7.50¢*7.50¢* Alaska Air Group Net Profit 7.5¢ Cost per Available Seat Mile (excluding fuel and unusual items) Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Continuous Adjusted for unusual items 7.0¢ Improvement 150 137.7 20012002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 125.0 target 92.3 *Represents Alaska Airlines mainline flying 100 84.5* 55.0 50 13.5 5.2 Horizon Air Unit Costs 0 ($ millions) -15.3 20¢ -30.8 -50 -43.4 18.95¢ -52.6 -67.2 -67.5 18¢ -100 -88.3 20012002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 15.99¢ 16¢ 15.80¢ *(5.9) mil. after accounting change See reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted amounts on page 112. 14.58¢ 14.60¢ 14.19¢ 13.58¢ 14¢ 13.35¢ Cost per Available Seat Mile (excluding fuel and unusual items) Continuous 12¢ Improvement Airlines have many moving parts, but when you 20012002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 boil it down, there are just two main drivers of target profitability — what it costs to provide our service and what our customers pay for it. We’re proud of the progress we’ve made lowering our non-fuel unit costs. During the past Costs six years we’ve achieved $298 million in annual reductions at Alaska Airlines and $174 million at In 2007, we succeeded in lowering Alaska’s Horizon Air (measured in terms of 2007 available non-fuel unit costs (CASM excluding fuel) by seat miles). But we’re not yet where we need to 3.2 percent. CASM excluding fuel for Horizon be, and we have several initiatives underway that was up 2.8 percent, and if you exclude the costs will help us continue to lower these costs, not associated with fleet transition, Horizon’s unit the least of which is completing Alaska’s costs increased only 0.3 percent last year. (To transition to a single 737 fleet type later this provide some perspective, Alaska’s mainline year and Horizon’s transition out of smaller, operation accounted for about 80 percent of less-efficient Q200s in 2009. Alaska Air Group’s $3.5 billion in total revenues 2 We plan to replace the 37-seat Q200s with 76-seat handling performance in Seattle and are already Q400s. The Q400 provides twice as many seats for beginning to see results from some of the changes just a third more in operating cost, resulting in we’ve made. At Horizon, where an unusually high significantly lower unit costs. Lower unit costs level of planned maintenance contributed to a cost mean we can offer lower fares and stimulate new “bubble” in 2007, we are working hard to operate traffic in some of our markets, such as the Seattle- more efficiently and improve our cost structure. Portland shuttle where our primary competition is the automobile. The rising price of fuel has presented its own set of challenges. With crude oil at $65 per barrel in March 2007, who would have guessed we’d be looking at $100 or more per barrel just one year later. Fuel is now our largest expense, accounting for 28 percent of Alaska Air Group’s total operating expense on an economic basis in 2007. And even though Alaska was able to grow while consuming the same amount of fuel as the year before (through our transition to more fuel-efficient 737-800s), the airline’s fuel bill still rose by about $145 million in 2007 — and that’s after a $53.4 million benefit from our fuel hedges. To see why Horizon’s shuttle service beats driving, go to www.I-5slog.com Of course, the best way to control our fuel expense is to not burn it in the first place. Completing We’re striving to make our operation as efficient as Alaska’s fleet transition later this year means we possible to better serve our customers, and this will have one of the lowest fuel costs per available year we are making some significant investments at seat mile in the industry at a time when it matters Alaska and Horizon that will lay the foundation for most. And Horizon’s fleet changes will translate long-term service and cost benefits. We are focused into better fuel efficiency, as well. on improving Alaska’s on-time and baggage- Fuel Consumption by Narrow-body Jet Aircraft Type Alaska Airlines Fleet 17 16 15 14 13 Gallons/Seat 12 11 10 737-900 737-800 A320 757-200 737-700 737-400 A319 MD-80* DC-9 172 seats 157 seats 149 seats 182 seats 124 seats 144 seats 122 seats 140 seats 140 seats Type of Aircraft *Alaska will retire its MD-80 fleet in 2008. Based on nominal fuel burn for a trip length of 1,000 statute miles. Assumes 100% load factor and 220 lbs for each passenger plus bag. Source: The Boeing Company 3 Fuel Consumption by Regional Aircraft Type Horizon Air Fleet 12 10 8 6 Gallons/Seat 4 2 Q400 CRJ900 Embraer 190 CRJ700 Q200* CRJ200 E170 Beech 1900 76 seats 88 seats 99 seats 70 seats 37 seats 50 seats 72 seats 19 seats Type of Aircraft *Horizon will retire its Q200 fleet in 2009. Based on nominal fuel burn for a trip length of 400 statute miles. Assumes 100% load factor. Source: Bombardier We are conserving fuel in other ways, too. For Average Revenue Per Passenger example, by the end of this year almost all our Horizon Air Next-Generation aircraft will have winglets, which Alaska Airlines $150 145 reduce fuel burn by about 3 percent. We’ve also 143 developed “Required Navigation Performance” 130 122 124 (RNP) procedures that save both fuel and time $125 118 118 through more direct flight routings, allow us to perform constant-descent approaches, and * $100 * 94 decrease the need to over fly destinations due to 90 92 84* inclement weather. Last year, the RNP 81 81 82 approaches we developed kept us from having to $75 divert more than 1,200 arrivals as a result of weather, saving an estimated $8 million in the $50 process.
Recommended publications
  • ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 February 16, 2012 (Date of earliest event reported) ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) 1-8957 91-1292054 (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 19300 International Boulevard, Seattle, Washington 98188 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (206) 392-5040 (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) ITEM 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers. Retirement of Bill Ayer as CEO of Alaska Air Group, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Horizon Air Industries, Inc.; Appointment of Brad Tilden as Ayer's Successor On February 15, 2012, the board of directors and Bill Ayer announced that Ayer will retire as Chief Executive Officer of Alaska Air Group (the “Company”) and its subsidiary carriers, effective at the company's annual shareholder meeting on May 15, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • 164 - 41 NMB No
    NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD WASHINGTON, DC 20572 (202) 692-5000 In the Matter of the Application of the 41 NMB No. 39 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES PILOTS CASE NO. R-7403 ASSOCIATION (File No. CR-7125) alleging a representation dispute FINDINGS UPON pursuant to Section 2, Ninth, of INVESTIGATION the Railway Labor Act, as amended August 5, 2014 involving employees of SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. AND AIRTRAN AIRWAYS This determination addresses the application filed pursuant to the Railway Labor Act (RLA)1 by the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA). SWAPA requests the National Mediation Board (NMB or Board) to investigate whether Southwest Airlines Co. (Southwest) and AirTran Airways (AirTran) (collectively the Carriers) are operating as a single transportation system. The investigation establishes that Southwest and AirTran are operating as a single transportation system for the craft or class of Pilots. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 2, 2011, Southwest Airlines Co. acquired one hundred percent of the outstanding stock of AirTran Holdings, Inc., the former parent company of AirTran. AirTran operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southwest. The integration process is expected to be finalized by the end of 2014, at which time AirTran will no longer exist. 1 45 U.S.C. § 151, et seq. - 164 - 41 NMB No. 39 On June 3, 2014, SWAPA filed an application alleging a representation dispute involving the craft or class of Pilots. The Pilot craft or class at Southwest is represented by SWAPA pursuant to voluntary recognition. Pilots at AirTran are represented by the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) under the Board’s certification in NMB Case Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • General* Virginia Private Equity Deals*
    VIRGINIA M&A ACTIVITY SNAPSHOTS 2002-2006 US M&A Global M&A Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) 2006 11296 $ 1,776,292.75 2006 27912 $ 3,679,516.00 2005 10348 $ 1,297,140.12 2005 24526 $ 2,627,013.25 2004 9716 $ 971,593.81 2004 22102 $ 1,914,663.25 2003 8109 $ 627,724.56 2003 19353 $ 1,221,885.25 2002 7316 $ 528,825.06 2002 18557 $ 1,130,339.12 Virginia M&A - General* Virginia Private Equity Deals* Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) Year Deal Count Volume (Millions) 2006 437 $ 49,844.53 2006 40 $ 2,345.49 2005 381 $ 51,440.98 2005 17 $ 396.05 2004 370 $ 61,057.25 2004 14 $ 598.85 2003 293 $ 16,980.39 2003 13 $ 1,604.73 2002 282 $ 21,126.50 2002 10 $ 536.20 * Any involvement: includes deals with either target, acquirer or seller * Any involvement: includes deals with either target, acquirer or seller headquartered in the state. headquartered in the state. 2006 Active Industries - VA Industry Deal Count Volume (mil) Communications 40 $ 10,190.03 Industrial 22 $ 3,710.94 Consumer, Non-cyclical 41 $ 3,248.73 Financial 57 $ 2,748.02 Technology 41 $ 655.11 * Target Only: Includes deals in which target is headquartered in the state Top 5 Deals 2006 - US * Any Involvement Announced Rank Date Total Value (mil.) Target Name Acquirer Name 1 3/ 5/06 $ 83,105.46 BELLSOUTH CORP AT&T INC 2 11/20/2006 $ 32,500.31 EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TR BLACKSTONE GROUP 3 7/24/06 $ 32,193.46 HCA INC CONSORTIUM 4 5/29/06 $ 27,449.73 KINDER MORGAN INC Knight Holdco LLC 5 10/2/2006 $ 27,159.94 HARRAH'S ENTERTAINMENT INC CONSORTIUM * Bain
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 2008 Alaska Airlines Earnings Conference Call on Jan. 29. 2009
    FINAL TRANSCRIPT ALK - Q4 2008 Alaska Airlines Earnings Conference Call Event Date/Time: Jan. 29. 2009 / 11:30AM ET www.streetevents.com Contact Us © 2009 Thomson Financial. Republished with permission. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of Thomson Financial. FINAL TRANSCRIPT Jan. 29. 2009 / 11:30AM, ALK - Q4 2008 Alaska Airlines Earnings Conference Call CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS Shannon Alberts Alaska Air Group - Managing Director, IR Bill Ayer Alaska Air Group - Chairman, CEO Glenn Johnson Alaska Air Group - CFO Brad Tilden Alaska Airlines - President Jeff Pinneo Horizon Air - President, CEO Jay Schaefer Alaska Air Group - VP of Finance, Controller Caroline Boren Alaska Airlines - Managing Director, Corporate Communications CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANTS Mike Linenberg Merrill Lynch - Analyst William Greene Morgan Stanley - Analyst Ray Neidl Calyon Securities - Analyst Peter Jacobs Ragen MacKenzie - Analyst Helane Becker Jesup and Lamont - Analyst Megan Kuhn Flight International - Media PRESENTATION Operator Good morning. I will be your conference Operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Alaska Air Group 2008 fourth quarter earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers© remarks, there will be a question and answer session. (Operator Instructions) At this time it is my pleasure to turn the conference over to the Managing Director of Investor Relations, Shannon Alberts. Please go ahead. Shannon Alberts - Alaska Air Group - Managing Director, IR Thanks. Hello everyone and thank you for joining us for Alaska Air Group©s fourth quarter 2008 conference call.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Case: 11-16173 05/23/2011 ID: 7761902 DktEntry: 16-1 Page: 1 of 23 (1 of 93) No. 11-16173 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WAYNE TALEFF., et al . Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., GUADALUPE HOLDINGS CORP., and AIRTRAN HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants-Appellees. On Appeal of an Interlocutory Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Case NO. 3:11-CV-2179-JW) PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INJUNCTION SEEKING TEMPORARY “HOLD SEPARATE” ORDER PENDING DISPOSITION OF MALANEY, ET AL., V. UAL CORPORATION, ET AL. AND REQUEST FOR RELIEF PENDING THIS APPEAL JOSEPH M. ALIOTO (SBN 42680) THERESA D. MOORE (SBN 99978) THOMAS P. PIER (SBN 235740) JAMIE L . MILLER (SBN 271452) ALIOTO LAW FIRM 225 BUSH STREET 16 TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO , CALIFORNIA 94104 TEL : (415) 434-8900 FAX : (415) 434-9200 JMILLER @ALIOTOLAW .COM TMOORE @ALIOTOLAW .COM Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants Case: 11-16173 05/23/2011 ID: 7761902 DktEntry: 16-1 Page: 2 of 23 (2 of 93) TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ..........................................................1 ARGUMENT .............................................................................................1 I. THIS COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR THIS APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.A. SECTION 1292 AND THIS COURT’S PRIOR HOLDINGS.........................................2 A. Denial of the Temporary Restraining Order is Appealable because Denial of All Relief was Implied in the Denial by the District Court ...............................................................3 B. Denial of the Temporary Restraining Order is Appealable because Denial of the Temporary Restraining Order was Tantamount to the Denial of the Preliminary Injunction .5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Air Group Sustainability Report 2012
    Alaska Air Group Sustainability Report 2012 Reporting period January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2011 WHO WE ARE Welcome Alaska Air Group is committed to leading our industry in environmental stewardship. We are dedicated to honorable and responsible relationships with our customers, employees, investors, business partners and the communities where we fly. This is Air Group’s first full Sustainability Report and expands on our first Environmental Report that we published in 200. This Sustainability Report summarizes the significant effects of our environmental, economic and social goals, progress and impacts. Our intention is to transparently document our corporate social responsibility efforts and use this report as a platform for dialogue and collaboration to drive continued improvement and innovation. We report on the facilities that are maintained by Alaska Air Group. Although we do not document the environmental or social impacts of our suppliers, where relevant we describe collaborative improvement efforts and procurement restrictions. This report covers Air Group’s two carriers, Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air. We describe aggregated data for Air Group as well as separate data for the two airlines where the information is relevant and available. This report summarizes data from Jan. , 200, to Dec. 3, 20. Where available, we include data showing trends over multiple years. This report is consistent with Level B requirements of the internationally recognized Global Reporting Initiative. Although the report has not been externally assured, financial and governance data drawn from our 2011 Annual Report (as reported on Form 0k) were audited by KPMG. Our current plan is to publish a Sustainability Report every other year.
    [Show full text]
  • Soaring High in Search of Discoveries
    Community Connection Volume 3, Issue 4 · Fall 2014 Soaring high in search InsIDE THIS IssUE of discoveries: Be inspired at the Discovery Gala Gala co-pilots share why Page 2 » kidney research matters Leading the volunteer team planning this year’s Discovery Gala are Bill Give through and Pam Ayer of Bellevue. He’s the retired chief executive credited with your workplace Page 4 » a dramatic turnaround of Alaska Airlines, and she has a transplanted kidney donated by her sister in 2011. “When you come to the Gala,” Pam promises, “you’ll find it informative and you’ll walk away feeling better because you were there. It’s going to Safety first be a great evening with engaging people and informative conversations. Page 6 » Who wouldn’t want to come?” Continued on page 3. Free estate planning seminars Page 8 » Discovery Gala Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014 5:30 – 11 p.m. Hyatt Regency Bellevue www.nwkidney.org/gala More details on pages 2-3. Pam and Bill Ayer are co-chairs of the 2014 Discovery Gala. 2 Community Connection Discovery Transforming lives throughGala research Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014 5:30 – 11 p.m. Hyatt Regency Bellevue 900 Bellevue Way NE, Bellevue Join us for a very special evening as we celebrate and support innovations in kidney disease research. The evening begins with champagne and cocktails and a gourmet dinner. Bid on a vacation to remember or specially selected prize packages. Enjoy the dueling pianos and groove to the high energy vocals and horn section of Players Club. Know that you’re not just having a great time, you’re helping to raise funds for kidney research.
    [Show full text]
  • ALASKA AIR GROUP 2009 ENVIRONMENT REPORT WELCOME Alaska Air Group 2009 Environment Report
    ImprovIng our envIronmental footprInt ALASKA AIR GROUP 2009 ENVIRONMENT REPORT WELCOME Alaska Air Group 2009 Environment Report IN THIS REPORT ABOUT THIS REPORT Welcome to Alaska Air Group’s 2009 Environment Report. Our goal in 2009 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS publishing this report is to communicate openly with employees, customers, investors, analysts and other key stakeholders about our environmental impact. The hope is that this report will serve as a foundation for increased understanding of the challenges asso­ ciated with continued environmental improvement and aid in the search for innovative solutions. Alaska Air Group | 2009 Environment Report 2 about thIs report Alaska Air Group’s first corporate Environment Report is structured around communicating Alaska Air Group’s commitment to leadership and continuous improvement in environ­ mental performance; openly discussing the key impacts, opportunities, and challenges in our industry; and describing our performance and initiatives in each of the significant areas of environmental impact. Within this structure, we also convey the character, values, and strengths of our people and organizational culture. We are just beginning the process of assessment and reporting. A major task over the past two years has been developing appropriate key performance indicators, measurement processes, and infrastructure for data collection and analysis as a foundation for under­ standing where we are, establishing baseline data, reporting meaningful information, and developing improvement plans. This report focuses on the environment. The time period covered by this report is January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2009, for Alaska Air Group’s two airline carriers: Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air. Where data is available, we describe environmental impacts for two to six years prior to 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Keith Loveless: Outstanding Corporate Counsel (Medium Size Legal Team)
    CORPORATE COUNSEL OF THE YEAR Keith Loveless: Outstanding Corporate Counsel (Medium size legal team) BUSINESS JOURNAL PHOTO | Dan Schlatter Keith Loveless Vice President of Legal & Corporate Affairs and Corporate Secretary Alaska Airlines Keith Loveless began his career at Alaska Air Group 25 years ago as a corporate lawyer. In 1999, he was appointed vice president of legal and corporate affairs, general counsel and corporate secretary. During his time with Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air Industries, the parent company, Loveless has helped negotiate labor and employment agreements for Alaska Airlines employees represented by a total six bargaining groups, hammer out benefits plans, navigate securities regulation and compliance and governance issues, and finance and acquire new airplanes. He has also advises the board of directors, oversees the companies ethics programs, accounting audits and safety and operational audits, and supervises litigation. “What I tell my kids I do every day is, I help run a company, and that’s how I feel about it and it’s a lot of fun,” Loveless said. Alaska CEO Bill Ayer calls Loveless “a trusted business partner.” “In addition to his high ethical standards, he brings a seasoned and balanced perspective to senior management and board deliberations that appropriately takes into consideration the long‐term success of the company as well as the legal risks,” Ayer said. “He is known for providing sound, practical advice, and his counsel is sought out by colleagues and coworkers.” Ayer also said that the Chicago native, who grew up in small towns in cotton farming and industrial northern region of Alabama, is highly unusual among corporate counsel.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Airlines: Navigating Change
    For the exclusive use of S. Ahmad, 2017. W14722 ALASKA AIRLINES: NAVIGATING CHANGE Bruce J. Avolio, Chelley Patterson and Bradford Baker wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 0N1; (t) 519.661.3208; (e) [email protected]; www.iveycases.com. Copyright © 2015, Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation Version: 2015-03-25 In the autumn of 2007, Alaska Airlines executives adjourned at the end of a long and stressful day in the midst of a multi-day strategic planning session. Most headed outside to relax, unwind and enjoy a bonfire on the shore of Semiahmoo Spit, outside the meeting venue in Blaine, a seaport town in northwest Washington state. Meanwhile, several members of the senior executive committee and a few others met to discuss how to adjust plans for the day ahead. This group included Bill Ayer, president and chief executive officer (CEO); Brad Tilden, executive vice-president (EVP) of finance and chief financial officer; Glenn Johnson, EVP of airport service and maintenance & engineering; the company’s chief counsel and executives from Marketing and Planning, Strategic Planning and Employee Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Reason for Removal of Companies from Sample
    Schedule D-6 Part 12 Page 1 of 966 Number of Companies Sheet Name Beginning Ending Reason for Removal of Companies from Sample US Screen 2585 2283 Removed all companies incorporated outside of the US Equity Screen 2283 476 Removed all companies with 2007 common equity of less than $100 million, and all companies with missing or negative common equity in Market Screen 476 458 Removed all companies with less than 60 months of market data Dividend Screen 458 298 Removed all companies with no dividend payment in any quarter of any year Trading Screen 298 297 Removed all companies whose 2007 trading volume to shares outstanding percentage was less than 5% Rating Screen 297 238 Removed all companies with non-investment grade rating from S&P, and removed all companies with a Value Line Safety Rank of 4 or 5 Beta Screen 238 91 Removed all companies with Value Line Betas of 1 or more ROE Screen 91 81 Removed those companies whose average 1996-2007 ROE was outside a range of 1 std. deviation from the average Final Set 81 81 DivQtr04-08 data on quarterly dividend payouts MktHistory data on monthly price closes Trading Volume data on 2007 trading volume and shares outstanding S&P Debt Rating data on S&P debt ratings CEQ% data on 2006 and 2007 common equity ratios ROE data on ROE for 1996-2007 ROE Check calculation for ROE Screen Schedule D-6 Part 12 Page 2 of 966 any year 1991 through 2007 Schedule D-6 Part 12 Page 3 of 966 GICS Country of Economic Incorporati Company Name Ticker SymbSector on 1‐800‐FLOWERS.COM FLWS 25 0 3CI COMPLETE COMPLIANCE CORP TCCC 20 0 3D SYSTEMS CORP TDSC 20 0 3M CO MMM 20 0 4KIDS ENTERTAINMENT INC KDE 25 0 800 TRAVEL SYSTEMS INC IFLYQ 25 0 99 CENTS ONLY STORES NDN 25 0 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivatives Supply and Corporate Hedging: Evidence from the Safe Harbor Reform of 2005
    Derivatives Supply and Corporate Hedging: Evidence from the Safe Harbor Reform of 2005 Erasmo Giambona Ye Wang Syracuse University, Whitman School Shanghai University of Finance and of Management Economics [email protected] [email protected] This Draft: September 1, 2017 Abstract This paper analyzes the importance of supply-side frictions for corporate hedging. To identify this relationship, we exploit a regulatory change that allows derivatives counterparties to circumvent the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay and preference rules: The Safe Harbor Reform of 2005. Following the reform-induced expansion in the availability of derivatives, fuel hedging of airlines near financial distress (those that benefited the most from the reform) increased significantly relative to financially sound airlines. Similarly, we find that hedging propensity increased for a general sample of non-financial firms. In line with theory, we also find that firm’s value and performance increased after the 2005 reform for the affected firms. Our analysis provides also evidence consistent with unsecured creditor “runs”. Keywords: supply-side frictions, safe harbor reform, fuel hedging, airlines, firm's value, unsecured creditor runs. * Erasmo Giambona, Michael J. Falcone Chair of Real Estate Finance, Syracuse University, 721 University Avenue, Syracuse, NY 13244-2450, USA. Ye Wang, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 777 Guoding Road, Shanghai, Shanghai 200433, China. We are grateful for comments from Murillo Campello and seminar participants at the University of Amsterdam. 1. Introduction Economic theory suggests that firms hedge to mitigate credit rationing (Froot, Scharfstein, and Stein, 1993; Holmström and Tirole, 2000), to reduce information asymmetry (DeMarzo and Duffie, 1991, 1995; Breeden and Viswanathan, 2016), or to alleviate the risk of financial distress (Smith and Stulz, 1985; Stulz, 2013).
    [Show full text]