DOCSLIB.ORG

Ozark Plateau Ecosystem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ozark Plateau Ecosystem U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Ozark Plateau Ecosystem USFWS Field Stations The Ecosystem Team includes 5 National with private landowners, caving clubs, Fish Hatcheries, 3 Ecological Services conservation organizations, local gov- Field Offices, 2 National Wildlife Refuges, ernments, and others to further the 2 Law Enforcement Offices. This ecosys- protection efforts for this unique re- tem crosses the Service’s Regional Bound- source. aries encompassing portions of Regions 3, 4, and 2. ■ Conserve Unique and Rare Species The Ozark Plateau is home to numerous Partners rare and declining species, unique State agencies, including the Arkansas endemics, neotropical migrant birds, Game and Fish Commission, Arkansas and other species that are of concern to Department of Environmental Quality, the Service. In addition to conservation Arkansas State Parks, Illinois Natural and protection of these species and their History Survey, the Missouri Department habitats, the Ozarks is faced with the of Conservation and the Missouri Depart- management challenges of addressing ment of Natural Resources; Federal invasive species issues. partners including the U.S. Forest Ser- vice, U.S. Environmental Protection ■ Improve Recreational Fisheries and Agency, National Park Service, and U.S. Mitigation Hatcheries Geological Survey Biological Resources The Service will continue to address the Division, and Department of Agriculture; fisheries needs of altered environments Non-governmental conservation organi- as a result of the construction of federal zations such as The Nature Conservancy, dams. The goal is to ensure a healthy Oklahoma Wildlife Federation, the Trust aquatic ecosystem and an adequate for Public Land, and Bat Conservation sustainable recreational fisheries. International; Local Governments, Cav- National Fish Hatcheries, in partner- ing Clubs and Spelunkers; Universities in ship with state natural resource Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Okla- agencies, will stock fish species (both homa; and local landowners throughout native and non-native) ideally suited for the Ozark Plateau. these altered environments in Northern Arkansas and Southwestern Missouri. Ecosystem Description The Ozark Plateau is a dome shaped uplift Contacts of approximately 50,000 square miles in Roderick May, Team Leader, 417-451- Arkansas, Oklahoma and Missouri. It is 0554; Lisa Mandell, Biologist, 612-713- characterized by horizontal bedrock, 5167 caves, sink holes, and natural springs. The rivers and streams in this area flow in all Web Address directions. Losing streams recharge Ozark Plateau ecosystem: groundwater. The ecosystem is rich in http://midwest.fws.gov/ecosys/ozark.htm biological diversity and includes species that are found only in the Ozark Plateau. The main vegetation is upland oak-hickory forest and bottomland hardwood forest in the floodplains of large rivers. Landscape Priorities ■ Conserve Karst System Conservation of the karst system of the Ozarks includes work to improve and protect water quality, educate the public on the effects of human activity on karst, and protection of the unique under ground species that live in karst habitat. It also involves developing partnerships Great Lakes - Big Rivers Region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake of the Ozarks Regional Housing Study Acknowledgments
    LAKE OF THE OZARKS REGIONAL HOUSING STUDY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The project team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the residents of the Lake Region, who gave their time, ideas, and exper- tise for the creation of this plan. It is only with their assistance and direction the plan gained the depth necessary to truly represent the spirit of the Lake Region and it is with their commitment that the plan will be implemented. We would also like to thank the partner organizations, Lake of the Ozarks Regional Economic Development Council who financially sup- ported this study and provided their leadership. A special thanks to everyone involved. Project Manager LOREDC BOARD Roger Corbin Tim Jacobsen Jeana Woods COMMITTEE Jacob Neusche Kim Willey Corey ten Bensel Linda Conner Brent Depeé Colleen Richey Debbie Hurr Russell Clay Jeff Hancock Cary Patterson Lori Hoelscher Vicki Devine Dennis Croxton Vicki Brown Kevin McRoberts Stan Schultz Roger Corbin CONSULTING TEAM RDG Planning & Design Omaha and Des Moines www.RDGUSA.com CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 7 CHAPTER 2: PROFILE OF THE REGION 11 CHAPTER 3: CAMDEN COUNTY 49 CHAPTER 4: MORGAN COUNTY 79 CHAPTER 5: MILLER COUNTY 103 CHAPTER 6: LACLEDE COUNTY 127 CHAPTER 7: DEFINING HOUSING ISSUES / DIRECTIONS FORWARD 153 CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 LAKE OF THE OZARKS REGIONAL HOUSING STUDY | Introduction INTRODUCTION The Lake of the Ozarks Regional Housing Study represents an in-depth study of the housing conditions of the three counties that constitute the Lake of the Ozarks Regional Economic Development Council (LOREDC). This includes the counties of Camden, Miller, and Morgan and the commercial centers of Camdenton, Eldon, Lake Ozark, Osage Beach, and Versailles.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Eastern Redcedar Infestations in the Northern Kansas Flint Hills Author(S): Clenton E
    Society for Range Management Evaluation of Eastern Redcedar Infestations in the Northern Kansas Flint Hills Author(s): Clenton E. Owensby, Kenneth R. Blan, B. J. Eaton, O. G. Russ Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Range Management, Vol. 26, No. 4 (Jul., 1973), pp. 256-260 Published by: Allen Press and Society for Range Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3896570 . Accessed: 20/12/2011 14:12 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Allen Press and Society for Range Management are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Range Management. http://www.jstor.org Arizona ranchers are enthusiastic about the potential ways and Public Works. 19(12):3-7. application of horizontal well drilling in remote and rough Root, A. W. 1955. Horizontal drill, Calif. Highways and Public Works. country. 34(3): 26-29. Stanton, T. E. 1948. Hydrauger method. Calif. Highways and Public LiteratureCited Works. 27(1):6-10). Tripp, Vollie. 1963. Not how deep but how long says this driller. Water Hellesoe, G. F. 1941. Los Gatos-Santa Cruz highway slipout. Calif. High- Well J. 17(5):21, 36-38.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods
    The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods ... Have We Forgotten? Introduction - This report was originally written as NWS Technical Attachment 81-11 in 1981, the thirtieth anniversary of this devastating flood. The co-authors of the original report were Robert Cox, Ernest Kary, Lee Larson, Billy Olsen, and Craig Warren, all hydrologists at the Missouri Basin River Forecast Center at that time. Although most of the original report remains accurate today, Robert Cox has updated portions of the report in light of occurrences over the past twenty years. Comparisons of the 1951 flood to the events of 1993 as well as many other parenthetic remarks are examples of these revisions. The Storms of 1951 - Fifty years ago, the stage was being set for one of the greatest natural disasters ever to hit the Midwest. May, June and July of 1951 saw record rainfalls over most of Kansas and Missouri, resulting in record flooding on the Kansas, Osage, Neosho, Verdigris and Missouri Rivers. Twenty-eight lives were lost and damage totaled nearly 1 billion dollars. (Please note that monetary damages mentioned in this report are in 1951 dollars, unless otherwise stated. 1951 dollars can be equated to 2001 dollars using a factor of 6.83. The total damage would be $6.4 billion today.) More than 150 communities were devastated by the floods including two state capitals, Topeka and Jefferson City, as well as both Kansas Cities. Most of Kansas and Missouri as well as large portions of Nebraska and Oklahoma had monthly precipitation totaling 200 percent of normal in May, 300 percent in June, and 400 percent in July of 1951.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003
    Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003 Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team Arkansas Field Office 601 North University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72205 Oklahoma Field Office 2727 East 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74114 Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment ii 12/2003 Table of Contents Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment............................................................................................................................i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................4 Ecoregional Boundary Delineation.............................................................................................................................................4 Geology..........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Soils................................................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The Archeological Heritage of Kansas
    THE ARCHEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF KANSAS A Synopsis of the Kansas Preservation Plan by John D. Reynolds and William B. Lees, Ph.D. Edited By Robert J. Hoard and Virginia Wulfkuhle funded in part by a grant from the United States Department of the Interior National Park Service KSHS Archeology Popular Report No. 7 Cultural Resources Division Kansas State Historical Society Topeka, Kansas 2004 1 Preface This document is a synopsis of the archeology section of the Kansas Preservation Plan, which was financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, a division of the United States Department of the Interior, and administered by the Kansas State Historical Society. The contents and opinions, however, do not necessarily reflect the view or policies of the United States Department of the Interior or the Kansas State Historical Society. The Kansas Preservation Plan is a technical document that was developed for the Historic Preservation Department of the Kansas State Historical Society that is designed to provide the background for making informed decisions in preserving the state's heritage. The size and technical nature of the plan make it inaccessible to many who have interests or responsibilities in Kansas archeology. Thus, the following synopsis of the archeology sections of the Kansas Preservation Plan is designed as a non-technical, abbreviated introduction to Kansas archeology. William B. Lees and John D. Reynolds wrote the original version of this document in 1989. These two men were employed by the Kansas State Historical Society, respectively, as Historic Archeologist and Assistant State Archeologist. Bill Lees moved on to work in Oklahoma and Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • 26Th Annual Flint Hills Conference Chert Symposium Abstracts, March
    26th Annual FLINT HILLS ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE Abstracts—2004 <> Symposium Papers <> Anderson, Mark L. and Dan G. Horgen (both from University of Iowa’s-Office of the State Archaeologist, Iowa City) The Lithic Raw Material Assemblage at the University of Iowa’s—Office of the State Archaeologist: An Improved Framework for Lithic Analysis The UI-OSA lithic raw material assemblage encompasses over 250 in-state and 220 out- state samples. Multiple structural shortcomings in the assemblage have limited the efficacy of making clear geologic and geophysical associations. In turn, this has significantly limited the ability of making cultural inferences regarding prehistoric use. Consequently, the assemblage has been reorganized to align with the geologic column of Iowa, to represent geo-physical regions, and to afford a more systematic and consistent approach to lithic identification. Multiple software packages (e.g. Excell, Arc View, Visual Basic, Trimble Pathfinder, Dream Weaver) have been used to provide for a GIS based assemblage that features a web-based component affording research/identification of Iowa lithic materials from a remote location. Lastly, this paper summarizes analytical tools in addition to the existing macroscopic identification key that may be applied to the assemblage for improved future use. McGregor, Douglas S. (Kansas State University, Manhattan) Neutron Activation Analysis at Kansas State University, A Powerful Tool for Trace Element Characterization (in Symposium—“Sourcing Cherts: Looking East from the Flint Hills) Kansas State University nuclear facilities include a Neutron Activation Analyses (NAA) Laboratory. Neutron activation analysis is a powerful technique for determining trace element composition of a family of elements including most metals, heavy metals, and rare earth elements.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Grants Awarded
    GRANTS AWARDED 2019 CIVIC GRANTS Civic-Public AFTER THE HARVEST KANSAS CITY MO $75,000.00 Charity Civic-Public ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION NEBRASKA CITY NE $500,000.00 Charity BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - CRATER LAKE Civic-Public CENTRAL POINT OR $125,000.00 COUNCIL Charity BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - OREGON TRAIL Civic-Public EUGENE OR $75,000.00 COUNCIL Charity BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - PONY EXPRESS Civic-Public ST. JOSEPH MO $50,000.00 COUNCIL Charity Civic-Public CAMP WOOD YMCA ELMDALE KS $250,000.00 Charity CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY CAMP FOUNDATION Civic-Public MISSOULA MT $20,000.00 (CAMP MAK-A-DREAM) Charity Civic-Public CITY OF BAKER CITY BAKER CITY OR $20,000.00 Charity Civic-Public CITY OF FOREMAN FOREMAN AR $250,000.00 Charity Civic-Public EUREKA SPRINGS COMMUNITY CENTER EUREKA SPRINGS AR $27,000.00 Charity Civic-Public FIELDS & FUTURES EDMOND OK $75,000.00 Charity Civic-Public FIRST TEE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY KANSAS CITY MO $50,000.00 Charity Civic-Public FRIENDS OF ARROW ROCK, INC. ARROW ROCK MO $75,000.00 Charity Civic-Public FRIENDS OF THE WINTHROP LIBRARY WINTHROP WA $100,000.00 Charity Civic-Public GIRL SCOUTS - SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA OMAHA NE $50,000.00 Charity Civic-Public HARPER'S PLAYGROUND PORTLAND OR $40,000.00 Charity HARRIS PARK MIDTOWN SPORTS & ACTIVITY Civic-Public KANSAS CITY MO $35,000.00 CENTER Charity Civic-Public HARVESTERS FOOD NETWORK KANSAS CITY MO $500,000.00 Charity Civic-Public HERITAGE SERVICES OMAHA NE $500,000.00 Charity Civic-Public HERITAGE SERVICES OMAHA NE $100,000.00 Charity Civic-Public KANSAS CITY CAMPUS FOR ANIMAL
    [Show full text]
  • Back Story/Finding Aid
    PRESIDENT OBAMA’S KANSAS HERITAGE ORAL HISTORY PROJECT PART ONE: BACK STORY/FINDING AID President Obama’s Kansas Heritage Project In partnership with BCTV Butler Community College 102 S. Haverhill Road El Dorado, KS 67042 DEDICATION We dedicate this collection to our oral history narrators and to grandparents everywhere. It is they who hold fast the bonds of community from one generation to the next, and the next, through time. President Obama's Kansas Heritage Oral History Project by obamakansasheritage.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This project is supported by the Kansas Humanities Council, a non-profit cultural organization dedicated to promoting humanities programs across Kansas. More information is available at kansashumanities.org. 2 Back Story/Finding Aid Contents CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... 2 FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. 4 PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................... 7 About the President Obama’s Kansas Heritage Group ................................................................... 7 About the Oral History Project ....................................................................................................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Landscape Structure in the Southeastern Missouri Ozarks
    Analysis of Landscape Structure in the Southeastern Missouri Ozarks Ming Xu, Sart C. Saunders, and Jiquan Chen 1 Abstract.-We characterized the landscape structure within and surrounding the MOFEP study sites using Landsat TM data and GIS databases. Up to 31 percent of the landscape was within Iiparian zones. Road density was 1.4 km/km2 within the landscape but reached 2.0 km/km2 within 40-m stream buffers. More than 99 percent of the region had a slope <40 percent; about 92 percent of the area had an elevation <300 m. Land was evenly distrtbuted among aspect categortes. Upland forest dominated the landscape. Patch types were differentially distrtbuted by elevation and slope but evenly distrtbuted by aspect. An average of >80 percent of patches existed as edge habitat. Recent research has emphasized the influence consideration. Quantitative charactertzation of of dynamics in spatial pattern on ecological landscape pattern can allow managers to processes as diverse as hydrological activity monitor broad-scale ecological change (Swanson et at 1988), vegetation distrtbution (Hunsaker et al. 1994) and assess accurately (Zobel et al. 1976), species dispersal (Gustafson the impacts of differtng management regimes and Gardner 1996, Schumaker 1996) microcli­ (Baskent and Jordan 1995). Traditionally, matic gradients (Chen et al. 1995), and gene landscape structure has been defined by com­ flow (Futuyma 1986). The development of position (i.e., the types and amounts ofvegeta­ landscape ecology has provided new, interdisci­ tion patches found in the landscape) and rela­ plinary avenues to explore the role of spatial tive distrtbution of patches (i.e., patch-corrtdor­ heterogeneity in controlling ecological processes matrix model; Forman 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Highlands Dry-Mesic Forest and Woodland
    Rapid Assessment Reference Condition Model The Rapid Assessment is a component of the LANDFIRE project. Reference condition models for the Rapid Assessment were created through a series of expert workshops and a peer-review process in 2004 and 2005. For more information, please visit www.landfire.gov. Please direct questions to [email protected]. Potential Natural Vegetation Group (PNVG) R5FOWOdm Interior Highlands Dry-Mesic Forest and Woodland General Information Contributors (additional contributors may be listed under "Model Evolution and Comments") Modelers Reviewers Fryar, Roger [email protected] Paul Nelson [email protected] David H. Jurney [email protected] Doug Zollner [email protected] Vegetation Type General Model Sources Rapid AssessmentModel Zones Forested Literature California Pacific Northwest Local Data Great Basin South Central Dominant Species* Expert Estimate Great Lakes Southeast QUAL FAGR Northeast S. Appalachians LANDFIRE Mapping Zones Northern Plains Southwest QURU 44 ACSA N-Cent.Rockies ACRU Geographic Range This PNVG primarily occurs in the Interior Low Plateau, southern Central Lowland, Ozark Plateaus, and Ouachita physiographic provinces. It includes parts of Missouri, Arkansas and Oklahoma. Biophysical Site Description This type is found on a wide range of topographic positions, including drier sites and mixed mesophytic forests, distribution is nonetheless influenced by local conditions affecting moisture and fertility. Generally, from east to west, that distribution becomes more and more limited in extent and more dependent on very favorable habitat conditions. Drier sites (often oak dominated) represent approximately 75% of the total type while less than 25% of the type is represented as the most mesic sites in the upland landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiographic Divisions of Illinois
    STATE OF ILLINOIS DWIGHT H. GREEN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANK G. THOMPSON, Director DIVISION OF THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Chief URBANA RKPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS- NO. 129 PHYSIOGRAPHIC DIVISIONS OF ILLINOIS M. M. LEIGHTON, GEORGE E. EKBLAW, and LELAND HORBERG Reprinted from The Journal of Geology Vol. 56, No. 1, January, 1948 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1948 ORGANIZATION STATE OF ILLINOIS HON. DWIGHT H. GREEN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION HON. FRANK G. THOMPSON, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION HON. FRANK G. THOMPSON, Chairman W. H. NEWHOUSE, Ph.D., Geology ROGER ADAMS, Ph.D., D.Sc, Chemistry LOUIS R. HOVVSON, C.E., Engineering A. E. EMERSON, Ph.D., Biology LEWIS H. TIFFANY, Ph.D., Forestry GEORGE D. STODDARD, Ph.D., Litt.D, LL.D., L.II.D. President of the University of Illinois GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION M. M. LEIGHTON, Chief SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION 100 Natural Resources Building, Urbana M. M. LEIGHTON, Ph.D., Chief Enid TOWNLET, M.S., Assistant to the Chief Helen E. McMorris, Secretary to the Chief Velda A. Millard, Junior Asst. to the Chief Elizabeth Stephens, B.S., Geological Assistant GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mineral Resource Records Arthur Bevan, Ph.D., D.Sc, Principal Geologist in Vivian Gordon, Head Charge Ruth R. Warden, B.S., Research Assistant Dorothy F. Spencer, B.S., Technical Assistant Mary Burnett, Technical Assistant Coal Harriet C. Daniels, B.A., Technical Assistant G. H. Cady, Ph.D., Senior Geologist and Head GEOCHEMISTRY R. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ozark Plateau
    from the Kansas Geological Survey Ozark Plateau: Rocks and Minerals As its name suggests, this corner of southeastern Kansas The region’s highest point (with an elevation of 1,040 ft) is is part of the Ozarks of Missouri, Oklahoma, and Arkansas. located just a few miles east of one of the lowest points, Bounded by the Spring River on the west, the Ozark along the Spring River (elevation 770 ft). Plateau covers about 55 square miles and includes the towns of Baxter Springs and Galena. This region contains Common Rocks and Minerals the oldest surface rocks in the state, limestones that formed Galena.—Galena is lead sulfide (PbS), the principal about 345 million years ago during the later part of the mineral of lead ore. It occurs as metallic to lead-gray, cube- Mississippian Period. shaped crystals that break into cubic, right-angled frag- These rocks show that during the Late Mississippian, ments. Some galena crystals are very large. Galena is the land was alternately above and below sea level. When the sea advanced, limestones (and occasionally shales) were deposited. When the sea retreated, erosion set in. The Mississipian limestones contain chert (or flint). Because chert is much harder and more resistant to weath- ering than limestone, erosion of the softer limestone has left a thick blanket of chert gravel on hilltops and ridges. The thin and rocky soil of the region, combined with steep slopes, makes most of the region unsuitable for farming. Cropland is restricted to the valley floors of Shoal Creek and Spring River. Many of the hillsides are covered with hardwood forests, predominantly oaks and hickories, along with other trees, shrubs, and vines.
    [Show full text]