DOCSLIB.ORG

The Claussen Archaeological Site: Prehistory of the Flint Hills

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Claussen Archaeological Site: Prehistory of the Flint Hills Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press 2011 – Freedom’s Frontier in the Flint Hills Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal (Laurie J. Hamilton, Editor) The Claussen Archaeological Site: Prehistory Of The Flint Hills Rolfe Mandel Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/sfh Recommended Citation Mandel, Rolfe (2011). "The Claussen Archaeological Site: Prehistory Of The Flint Hills," Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal. https://newprairiepress.org/sfh/2011/nature/9 To order hard copies of the Field Journals, go to shop.symphonyintheflinthills.org. The Field Journals are made possible in part with funding from the Fred C. and Mary R. Koch Foundation. This is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Claussen Archaeological Site: Prehistory Of The Flint Hills On a warm afternoon in May 2000, I was walking along Mill Creek in Wabaunsee County inspecting soils and sediment exposed in a steep stream bank that stands about thirty feet above the creek. It is a common routine for me. Most of my research involves reconstructing the geology, paleoecology, and archaeology of stream valleys, so I look for places where creeks and rivers have cut into their own deposits. These cutbanks are my “windows” into the past. The stream bank along Mill Creek was Streams frequently deposit sediment on one of those windows. When I looked their floodplains, so it’s not unusual to down the steep face at the southern end find the remains from prehistoric people of the exposure, I noticed mussel shells, far below the land surface. Given what CLAUSSEN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MILL CREEK, WABAUNSEE COUNTY pieces of flint, and fire-reddened rocks I know about rates of sedimentation, I Steven Perry sticking out about eight feet below the suspected that the buried archaeological land surface – a buried archaeological site. horizon was approximately 1,000 years 99 old. My estimate wasn’t far off. Charcoal I also saw concentrations of artifacts 3-4 It is the second oldest recorded buried some animal bone. According to Roper, among the buried artifacts later yielded feet below the artifacts that initially caught archaeological site in the Flint Hills and this occupation represents a Middle a radiocarbon age of about 1,225 years my attention. The dark layer containing all among the oldest stratified sites in Kansas. Ceramic-period short-term encampment. before present. This places the occupation the artifacts is a former surface soil, now The most extensive excavations at the During the excavation more than 130 in the Middle Ceramic period, when buried under 25 feet of stream deposits. Claussen site occurred in 2003, when groups of farmers and hunter-gatherers Considering the depth of the artifacts the Kansas Anthropological Association The Claussen site is the inhabited the Flint Hills. and the magnitude of weathering in the and the Kansas State Historical Society second oldest recorded Although my discovery was significant, stream deposits, I knew the shallowest joined forces with the University of buried archaeological what I saw several hundred feet to the archaeological horizon was at least 10,500 Kansas for a two-week dig in the hot site in the Flint Hills and north and at a much greater depth was years old. Again, later radiocarbon dating July sun. Two groups of archaeologists even more exciting. As I cautiously walked confirmed my estimate. Three separate under the direction of Donna Roper among the oldest stratified along the bottom of the 30-foot-high stream archaeological horizons were identified and Virginia Wulfkuhle focused on the sites in Kansas. bank, I spotted mussel shells eroding out in the upper 3 feet of the buried soil: an Ceramic-age cultural deposits at and of a dark layer about 25 feet below a stream upper horizon dating to 10,300 years ago, near the south end of the stream bank, pottery fragments belonging to a single terrace. The terrace is a former floodplain a middle horizon dating to 10,400 years while a third group supervised by KU vessel were found over a small area. left elevated above the valley floor when a ago, and a lower horizon dating to 10,550 archaeologist Jack Hofman concentrated Partial reconstruction of the vessel stream down-cuts, and all of the sediment years before present. Based on these ages, on the deeply buried Late Paleoindian revealed a plug-shaped handle with a exposed in the tall bank was deposited the three cultural horizons represent Late cultural deposits at the north end. I human effigy face. The face is simple: over thousands of years by floodwaters. Paleoindian occupations on a former focused on the soils and stratigraphy of the eyes and mouth are holes that were I crawled up to the mussel shells and floodplain. the site and placed the archaeological made with a small hollow tool, and used a trowel to clean off the face of the This discovery on the bank of Mill record into a geologic context. finger pinches on the soft, pre-heated nearly vertical bank. With each stroke of Creek launched a series of archaeological A large excavation block at the clay formed the nose. the trowel, more mussel shells appeared, and paleoenvironmental investigations southern end of the stream bank The Late Paleoindian horizons along with charcoal, bone fragments, over the next ten years, and the locality exposed a pair of hearths surrounded by dating between 10,300 and 10,550 charred hackberry seeds, burned earth, would gain fame as the Claussen site, dense scatters of chipped stone, pottery, years ago yielded many chipped-stone and a few small pieces of chipped stone. named after landowner Dr. Vern Claussen. and mussel shells, plus several tools and artifacts, all derived from the Permian- 100 101 animal remains recovered here indicate in the North American archaeological that subsistence behaviors soon after record. Initially referred to as “turtleback the Ice Age were very different from the scrapers” because of their shape — flat on bison-focused Native Americans on the the bottom and humpbacked on the top— Plains out west at that time. Dalton adzes probably were hafted like No projectile points or other artifacts that could be assigned to specific cultural ...the earliest people who groups were found in the Paleoindian occupied the Claussen site horizons during the 2003 excavations. AN EFFIGY HUMAN FACE were eating just about every ON THE HANDLE OF A VESSEL UNEARTHED AT THE CLAUSSEN SITE However, inspection of the site in 2005 Kansas State Historical Society animal that came down to resulted in the discovery of a Dalton adze age Florence cherts, or “flint,” common occupied the Claussen site were eating used for smoothing rough-cut wood, plus the creek for a drink... to the Flint Hills. We discovered only just about every animal that came down a complete Dalton projectile point. The a small handful of tools, however. to the creek for a drink, plus waterfowl, adze and projectile point were lying at modern adzes, in which the cutting blade Nearly all of the stone artifacts were land birds, reptiles, mollusks, and the foot of the 30-foot-high stream bank, is perpendicular to the haft or handle. flakes shed during the production or fish. Deer and antelope were the most so their original position in the artifact- Over the past five years, we’ve learned sharpening of tools. Apparently, the common vertebrates, along with birds, bearing buried soil is unknown. The a lot about what the environment looked Paleoindians were careful not leave especially turkey. Fresh-water mussels Dalton period extends from about 12,500 like before, during, and after the periods many tools behind. This seems logical also were a major food source. The to 11,000 years ago, when a culture of of prehistoric human occupation at the given the great effort that goes into Paleoindians gathered live mussels from ancient Native American hunter-gatherers, Claussen site. The paleoenvironmental making them. Also, the remains of a gravel bars, placed them in shallow pits referred to as the Dalton people, made information has been gleaned from fossil variety of animals, including vertebrates with smoldering wood, and covered them a distinctive set of stone tools that are land and aquatic snails, from ancient and invertebrates, were found in the with green vegetation. This slow cooking today found at sites across the middle phytoliths (microscopic silica bodies Late Paleoindian horizons. Although process caused the shells to pop open – a of the United States, especially the left behind by plants) and from the Paleoindians frequently are described as Kansas clam bake. Oddly, the remains of Ozarks. The Dalton adze is the earliest chemistry of organic carbon preserved in big-game hunters, the earliest people who only one bison were found. Hence the known heavy-duty woodworking tool the soils and sediment at the site. 102 103 Here’s what we now know. About Also, upland prairie plants, including wild 12,500 years ago the valley bottom of Mill onion, prairie turnip, hog peanut, funnel Creek was a moist, woodland setting with lily, and Jerusalem artichoke, and a variety one or more springs in the immediate area of bottomland plants, such as hackberry, of the Claussen site. Between 12,500 and wild cucurbit, ragweed, goosefoot, marsh 10,600 years ago the setting became drier elder, and sunflower, were food sources. as spring activity decreased, though trees There’s high-quality Permian chert for were common.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake of the Ozarks Regional Housing Study Acknowledgments
    LAKE OF THE OZARKS REGIONAL HOUSING STUDY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The project team would like to acknowledge the contributions of the residents of the Lake Region, who gave their time, ideas, and exper- tise for the creation of this plan. It is only with their assistance and direction the plan gained the depth necessary to truly represent the spirit of the Lake Region and it is with their commitment that the plan will be implemented. We would also like to thank the partner organizations, Lake of the Ozarks Regional Economic Development Council who financially sup- ported this study and provided their leadership. A special thanks to everyone involved. Project Manager LOREDC BOARD Roger Corbin Tim Jacobsen Jeana Woods COMMITTEE Jacob Neusche Kim Willey Corey ten Bensel Linda Conner Brent Depeé Colleen Richey Debbie Hurr Russell Clay Jeff Hancock Cary Patterson Lori Hoelscher Vicki Devine Dennis Croxton Vicki Brown Kevin McRoberts Stan Schultz Roger Corbin CONSULTING TEAM RDG Planning & Design Omaha and Des Moines www.RDGUSA.com CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 7 CHAPTER 2: PROFILE OF THE REGION 11 CHAPTER 3: CAMDEN COUNTY 49 CHAPTER 4: MORGAN COUNTY 79 CHAPTER 5: MILLER COUNTY 103 CHAPTER 6: LACLEDE COUNTY 127 CHAPTER 7: DEFINING HOUSING ISSUES / DIRECTIONS FORWARD 153 CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 LAKE OF THE OZARKS REGIONAL HOUSING STUDY | Introduction INTRODUCTION The Lake of the Ozarks Regional Housing Study represents an in-depth study of the housing conditions of the three counties that constitute the Lake of the Ozarks Regional Economic Development Council (LOREDC). This includes the counties of Camden, Miller, and Morgan and the commercial centers of Camdenton, Eldon, Lake Ozark, Osage Beach, and Versailles.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
    OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf Author TRC Environmental Corporation Prepared under BOEM Contract M08PD00024 by TRC Environmental Corporation 4155 Shackleford Road Suite 225 Norcross, Georgia 30093 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region May 2012 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and TRC Environmental Corporation. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endoresements or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report is available only in compact disc format from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, at a charge of $15.00, by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2012-008. The report may be downloaded from the BOEM website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report also from the National Technical Information Service in the near future. Here are the addresses. You may also inspect copies at selected Federal Depository Libraries. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Standard for Pottery Analysis in Archaeology
    A Standard for Pottery Analysis in Archaeology Medieval Pottery Research Group Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group Study Group for Roman Pottery Draft 4 October 2015 CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Aims 1 1.2 Scope 1 1.3 Structure 2 1.4 Project Tasks 2 1.5 Using the Standard 5 Section 2 The Standard 6 2.1 Project Planning 6 2.2 Collection and Processing 8 2.3 Assessment 11 2.4 Analysis 13 2.5 Reporting 17 2.6 Archive Creation, Compilation and Transfer 20 Section 3 Glossary of Terms 23 Section 4 References 25 Section 5 Acknowledgements 27 Appendix 1 Scientific Analytical Techniques 28 Appendix 2 Approaches to Assessment 29 Appendix 3 Approaches to Analysis 33 Appendix 4 Approaches to Reporting 39 1. INTRODUCTION Pottery has two attributes that lend it great potential to inform the study of human activity in the past. The material a pot is made from, known to specialists as the fabric, consists of clay and inclusions that can be identified to locate the site at which a pot was made, as well as indicate methods of manufacture and date. The overall shape of a pot, together with the character of component parts such as rims and handles, and also the technique and style of decoration, can all be studied as the form. This can indicate when and how a pot was made and used, as well as serving to define cultural affinities. The interpretation of pottery is based on a detailed characterisation of the types present in any group, supported by sound quantification and consistent approaches to analysis that facilitate comparison between assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Eastern Redcedar Infestations in the Northern Kansas Flint Hills Author(S): Clenton E
    Society for Range Management Evaluation of Eastern Redcedar Infestations in the Northern Kansas Flint Hills Author(s): Clenton E. Owensby, Kenneth R. Blan, B. J. Eaton, O. G. Russ Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Range Management, Vol. 26, No. 4 (Jul., 1973), pp. 256-260 Published by: Allen Press and Society for Range Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3896570 . Accessed: 20/12/2011 14:12 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Allen Press and Society for Range Management are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Range Management. http://www.jstor.org Arizona ranchers are enthusiastic about the potential ways and Public Works. 19(12):3-7. application of horizontal well drilling in remote and rough Root, A. W. 1955. Horizontal drill, Calif. Highways and Public Works. country. 34(3): 26-29. Stanton, T. E. 1948. Hydrauger method. Calif. Highways and Public LiteratureCited Works. 27(1):6-10). Tripp, Vollie. 1963. Not how deep but how long says this driller. Water Hellesoe, G. F. 1941. Los Gatos-Santa Cruz highway slipout. Calif. High- Well J. 17(5):21, 36-38.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas North Montana Dakota
    Kansas North Montana Dakota South Dakota Wyoming Nebraska Utah Colorado Kansas Kansas Partners Program Conservation Focus Areas Introduction and Overview visible on global satellite images. “Natural Kansas” edited by Joseph It is within this prairie landscape, T Collins, University Press of Kansas is known as the “Prairie where PFW program is needed. Kansas. State.” Often, people will drive With 97% of the state in private through and have the perception ownership (Kansas Department Focus Area Selection of miles and miles of nothing, not of Wildlife and Parks 2008), there even a tree. The lack of trees, are ample opportunities for the Through continued communication cities, and crop fields, or rather, the PFW program to assist ranchers with our conservation partners we presence of vast intact grasslands and farmers with voluntary fish established four focus areas for the is exactly what makes Kansas and wildlife habitat restoration KS PFW program. The Southwest unique. This feature provides an projects. Over time, invasive Kansas Prairies and Playas, North extraordinary view of the past and species, fragmentation, and poor Central Prairies, Flint Hills, and what the landscape can continue land management have led to Central Wetlands and Prairies to look like in the future. The fact degradation and loss of prairie prioritize our conservation efforts. that someone can drive and see only habitats, contributing to the decline Using Geographic Information miles and miles of unaltered terrain of numerous Federal trust species. Systems (GIS) technologies, we is beautiful to many. A landscape Through educational efforts and incorporated datasets created void of trees, forms the unique the application of appropriate by conservation partners that character of the prairie and hosts a land management strategies, the included; species habitat models, vast amount of native wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods
    The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods ... Have We Forgotten? Introduction - This report was originally written as NWS Technical Attachment 81-11 in 1981, the thirtieth anniversary of this devastating flood. The co-authors of the original report were Robert Cox, Ernest Kary, Lee Larson, Billy Olsen, and Craig Warren, all hydrologists at the Missouri Basin River Forecast Center at that time. Although most of the original report remains accurate today, Robert Cox has updated portions of the report in light of occurrences over the past twenty years. Comparisons of the 1951 flood to the events of 1993 as well as many other parenthetic remarks are examples of these revisions. The Storms of 1951 - Fifty years ago, the stage was being set for one of the greatest natural disasters ever to hit the Midwest. May, June and July of 1951 saw record rainfalls over most of Kansas and Missouri, resulting in record flooding on the Kansas, Osage, Neosho, Verdigris and Missouri Rivers. Twenty-eight lives were lost and damage totaled nearly 1 billion dollars. (Please note that monetary damages mentioned in this report are in 1951 dollars, unless otherwise stated. 1951 dollars can be equated to 2001 dollars using a factor of 6.83. The total damage would be $6.4 billion today.) More than 150 communities were devastated by the floods including two state capitals, Topeka and Jefferson City, as well as both Kansas Cities. Most of Kansas and Missouri as well as large portions of Nebraska and Oklahoma had monthly precipitation totaling 200 percent of normal in May, 300 percent in June, and 400 percent in July of 1951.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003
    Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003 Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team Arkansas Field Office 601 North University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72205 Oklahoma Field Office 2727 East 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74114 Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment ii 12/2003 Table of Contents Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment............................................................................................................................i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................4 Ecoregional Boundary Delineation.............................................................................................................................................4 Geology..........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Soils................................................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Visualization and Collaborative Practice in Paleoethnobotany
    ARTICLE VISUALIZATION AND COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE IN PALEOETHNOBOTANY Jessica M. Herlich and Shanti Morell-Hart Jessica M. Herlich is a Ph.D. candidate at the College of William and Mary and Shanti Morell-Hart is Assistant Professor at McMaster University. aleoethnobotany lends unique insight into past lived Methodologies, Practices, and Multi-Proxy Understandings experiences, landscape reconstruction, and ethnoecolog- There are many methodologies within paleoethnobotany that ical connections. A wide array of paleoethnobotanical P lead to distinct yet complementary pieces of information, methodologies equips us to negotiate complementary under- whether due to scale of residue (chemical to architectural) or the standings of the human past. From entire wood sea vessels to technology available (hand loupes to full laboratory facilities). individual plant cells, all sizes of botanical remains can be The limits of archaeobotanical analysis are constantly expand- addressed through the tools available to an archaeobotanist. As ing as the accessibility and capabilities of technology improve. paleoethnobotanical interpretation is interwoven with other This is true for microscopes and software, which make it possi- threads of information, an enriched vision of the relationships ble for a paleoethnobotanist to capture and enhance the small- between landscape and people develops. est of cellular structures, and for telecommunications and digi- tal records, which are expanding the possibilities for decipher- Collaboration is a necessary component for archaeobotanical ing archaeobotanical material and for collaborating with distant analysis and interpretation. Through collaboration we make stakeholders. Improvements in technology are an integral part the invisible visible, the unintelligible intelligible, the unknow- of the exciting future of paleoethnobotany, which includes col- able knowable.
    [Show full text]
  • From Easement to Stewardship Attorneys at Law Focuses on Oil Flint Hills Ranches Get a Conservation Boost and Gas, Energy, Environmental and Real Estate Law
    KANSAS Fall 2020 • nature.org/kansas Photos courtesy Jeff Kennedy and John Mize Jeff Kennedy and John Mize Join Board of Trustees The Nature Conservancy’s Kansas Board of Trustees is pleased to announce two attorneys, Jeff Kennedy (Wichita) and John Mize Cattle drive in the Flint Hills, Chase county, Kansas © Ryan Donnell (Salina), have joined their ranks. Jeff’s practice at Martin Pringle, From Easement to Stewardship Attorneys at Law focuses on oil Flint Hills ranches get a conservation boost and gas, energy, environmental and real estate law. He served Conservation easements have long been of Kansas and Oklahoma. Stewardship on the Kansas Energy Council an important tool to protect farms, assistance may be in the form of help with and was a member of the Kansas ranches and working forests across the prescribed burning, equipment loans, Energy & Environmental Policy United States. They have been especially mapping of invasive species or cost- Advisory Group. effective in the Flint Hills, where nearly all share dollars. Emphasis will be placed on the land is privately owned and more than enhancing biodiversity of the property, John recently retired from Clark, 110,000 acres have been permanently and ongoing monitoring of plant and Mize and Linville, Chartered protected with conservation easements. animal communities will measure success. after a long career practicing While easements are an effective strategy health care and non-profit to curb the threat of development of “Layering this additional conservation law. He has served on the native grasslands, other conservation on top of easements advances our goal of Kansas Commission on Judicial challenges remain.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Activity Book
    Archaeology Activity Book Illustrations: Heather Brindza Text: Danielle Ellis Layout: Rebecca Conway Appalachian Forest Heritage Area (AFHA) is a non-profit, grassroots organization that promotes economic and community development by linking central Appalachian forest history, culture, natural history, products and forest management into a multi-state heritage tourism initiative. Monongahela National Forest hosts AFHA-sponsored AmeriCorps service at forest sites that enhance natural resources and tourism and connect local communities. The Eastern National Forests Interpretive Association (ENFIA) is a non-profit association that aids and promotes the historical, scientific, and educational activities of the USDA Forest Service. This activity book was made possible through grants and partnership agreements with AFHA AmeriCorps, ENFIA, and USDA Forest Service. Archaeology is the study of material culture left behind by people from the past. Material culture are things created or used by people, like stone tools, a glass bottle, or even an entire building. Archaeologists look for archaeological sites to try to answer questions about the past. A site is where artifacts, features, or ecofacts are grouped together in an area. This means people were in that area in the past, and it’s up to the archaeologist to figure out what they were doing there. Sometimes archaeologists find things that can’t be easily collected or are part of the environment past peoples used. These things are called features. Features are often large, like the foundation of a house, or difficult to collect from the site, like an ashy campfire ring. Feature example: campfire ring Artifacts are things created or used by past peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archeological Heritage of Kansas
    THE ARCHEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF KANSAS A Synopsis of the Kansas Preservation Plan by John D. Reynolds and William B. Lees, Ph.D. Edited By Robert J. Hoard and Virginia Wulfkuhle funded in part by a grant from the United States Department of the Interior National Park Service KSHS Archeology Popular Report No. 7 Cultural Resources Division Kansas State Historical Society Topeka, Kansas 2004 1 Preface This document is a synopsis of the archeology section of the Kansas Preservation Plan, which was financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, a division of the United States Department of the Interior, and administered by the Kansas State Historical Society. The contents and opinions, however, do not necessarily reflect the view or policies of the United States Department of the Interior or the Kansas State Historical Society. The Kansas Preservation Plan is a technical document that was developed for the Historic Preservation Department of the Kansas State Historical Society that is designed to provide the background for making informed decisions in preserving the state's heritage. The size and technical nature of the plan make it inaccessible to many who have interests or responsibilities in Kansas archeology. Thus, the following synopsis of the archeology sections of the Kansas Preservation Plan is designed as a non-technical, abbreviated introduction to Kansas archeology. William B. Lees and John D. Reynolds wrote the original version of this document in 1989. These two men were employed by the Kansas State Historical Society, respectively, as Historic Archeologist and Assistant State Archeologist. Bill Lees moved on to work in Oklahoma and Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of 1He Lithic Artifact Assemblage From
    AN ANALYSIS OF 1HE LITHIC ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE FROM THE FORBUSH CREEK SITE (31YD1), YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA by Jane Madeline McManus A thesis sul::mitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 1985 Approved by: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Dickens, Dr. Crumley, and Dr. Davis, whose support, help, and advice is greatly appreciated. I would especially like to thank Steve who helped me from the first day of this project to the last. You know I couldn't have done it without your help. I would also like to thank Dr. Dickens and Trawick for teaching me the ropes of photography. You all have made this a very rewarding learning experience. Finally, I would like to say thanks to Carol Anne and Lee for putting up with me and I'm sorry for the neglect. DEDICATION To Monnna and Daddy, with all my love and appreciation for the opportunity. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION • 1 RAW MATERIAL. 7 DEBITAGE. 8 CHIPPED STONE IMPLEMENTS • 15 CHIPPED STONE PROJECTILE POINTS. 22 GROUND STONE IMPLEMENTS. 28 DISCUSSION • 35 Characteristics of the Forbush Creek Assemblage • • 35 The Introduction of European Metal Tools. 36 The Subsistence Pattern. 37 Small Triangular Projectile Points. 38 SUMMARY. • 48 REFERENCES CITED. 50 APPENDICES • 51 Appendix A. Lithic Artifact Analysis Format. 52 Appendix B. Distribution of Lithic Artifacts by Feature. 58 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.
    [Show full text]