DOCSLIB.ORG

The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative: LLC for Philanthropy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative: LLC for Philanthropy Tax The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative: LLC for Philanthropy Adding flexibility but not tax savings, the use of an LLC rather than a private foundation for philanthropic efforts should not be controversial. This article was originally published in the March 2016 edition of Estate Planning magazine. by Michael Kosnitzky In December 2015, Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan announced an innovative type of philanthropic initiative. Perhaps never before, however, have people been so vilified for pledging to give away most of their net worth. The expression “no good deed goes unpunished” does not even begin to explain the way that the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) and Priscilla Chan and her husband Mark Zuckerberg have been treated by some members of the press and academia. Never in the history of mankind have two people pledged to do so much to Michael Kosnitzky advance human potential and promote equality and have been treated so Tax harshly for it. Perhaps some explanations are in order, however, as even some +1.786.913.4884 fair-minded individuals have gotten the technical aspects of the CZI planning [email protected] wrong. For purposes of simplicity, Ms. Chan and Mr. Zuckerberg are referred to in the discussion that follows as “the Zuckerbergs.” Michael Kosnitzky is a partner in Pillsbury’s Tax practice, resident in the law firm’s New Pledge rather than immediate gift York and Miami offices. His practice includes The Zuckerbergs’ commitment to give 99% of their Facebook shares (worth representation of both domestic and foreign about $45 billion) is a pledge. It is not an outright current gift, donation, high-net-worth individuals and corporations, investment, or expenditure. The Zuckerbergs agreed to spend their money over partnerships, limited liability companies, S time and have made a very public commitment to do so. corporations, and real estate investment trusts. Pledging cash or property to a charity is a very common practice. A pledge means that the pledger intends to perform in the future when the money is actually needed by the charity or when a specific event occurs—such as attaining a commitment letter for construction of a building, the hiring of a new CEO, or even the death of the pledger. The law governing the enforceability of pledges by charities against pledgers is well-settled. As a general rule, these pledges are not enforceable, meaning a pledge to a charity is only as good as the word of the person making the pledge. An exception applies, however, when the charity detrimentally relies on the pledge, which means that a particular charity incurred expenses or obligations specifically because of the pledger’s promise to donate and the pledger knew this and that the charity would be irreparably damaged if the pledger did not perform on his or her pledge. This is no different in substance than what the Zuckerbergs have done here except that their pledge, unlike the pledge of Optional label for Practice when there is no Bio info included. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP pillsburylaw.com Tax Tax most people to a specific charity, was Likewise, the LLC’s expenditures will tax deduction could be taken. In that offered more broadly, quite publically, flow through to the Zuckerbergs for tax situation, the increased benefit of and with great fanfare thereby purposes only when the LLC actually the deduction taken at a higher tax creating even greater assurance donates cash or Facebook stock to a rate could be greater than the time that the Zuckerbergs will perform charity, makes a gift to an individual, value of money benefit of taking the lest they be subject to great public or expends funds for other purposes deduction in an earlier year. If the ridicule or, in contemporary parlance, (e.g., lobbying for causes consistent Zuckerbergs were to make contribu- pubic “shaming” via social media and with the LLC’s business purpose). The tions of cash or stock today to either the Internet. Zuckerbergs will receive the exact same public charities (generally churches, tax treatment with respect to these schools, hospitals, governmental Tax effect of entity selection items of income and gain and expendi- entities, private operating foundations, The Zuckerbergs will continue to tures as they would have received had and other nonprofit entities organized own indirectly the Facebook stock they recognized the income and gain, for charitable, religious, educational, contributed to the limited liability or paid the expenditures directly and scientific, or literary purposes) or to company (LLC) until either it or not through the LLC. Nothing about an their own private foundation, instead the proceeds of its sale are donated LLC changes the way the Zuckerbergs of using an LLC, they would be to a charity, gifted to an individual, will be taxed. entitled to a current tax deduction invested in a for-profit company, against their income for the year the or used to pay lobbying or other contributions were made that could expenditures. This probably puts The LLC model does afford also be carried forward, if not fully them in a worse tax position than had greater flexibility for lobbying used, and applied against future they just donated some of the shares income for a maximum of five years.1 to a combination of public charities and for-profit activities than Once contributions are made to these and a private foundation. the charitable model. charities, and a current tax deduction taken by the Zuckerbergs, public A domestic LLC is treated as charities would be under absolutely a “flow-through entity” for most For instance, if the LLC makes a contri- no obligation to immediately deploy tax purposes. This means that an bution to a charity of cash or Facebook the funds or stock contributed by the LLC’s tax attributes flow through stock at some time in the future, the Zuckerbergs for charitable purposes. to its owners, who are in this case Zuckerbergs would at that time be Instead, the charity could decide not the Zuckerbergs. At present, the entitled to a tax deduction subject to to use the funds for its charitable primary asset of the LLC will be the various statutory limitations (some purposes until many years later. Facebook stock, so the Zuckerbergs of which are addressed below). While will continue to be responsible for the tax treatment would be the same In the case of a contribution to a any taxes associated with dividends regardless of whether the LLC was ever private foundation, the only obligation paid by the company on the shares formed, many of the strategies deployed would be to make the mandatory and gains from the sale of the shares in tax planning however are based annual distribution of 5% of the by the LLC, if any are in fact sold. on time value of money principles. value of its endowment2 but even Dividends, however, are unlikely to This means that tax professionals use this can be minimized in several be paid now or in the foreseeable techniques designed to accelerate ways. For example, besides grants future by the company because of the deductions so that they can be used to or contributions to other charities company’s focus on growth investing, reduce current taxes. The principle is for charitable purposes, reasonable and the ongoing requirement to pay simple: A tax deduction taken now is administrative expenses necessary for dividends would reduce the financial better than one taken later. the conduct of the charitable activities flexibility of the company. Facebook’s of the foundation itself, costs of all website, under Investor Relations, One important exception to this direct charitable activities, amounts clearly states that “Facebook does not proposition, not relevant here, is if paid to acquire assets used directly pay a dividend.” tax rates are expected to substantially in carrying out charitable purposes increase in a future year when the (such as computers, office furniture, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative: LLC for Philanthropy or an office building), assets set aside While the LLC model does afford for charitable purposes and program- greater flexibility for lobbying Charitable contribution related investments and loans, are all and for-profit activities than the deduction limits treated as qualifying distributions for charitable model, it is less tax efficient The ability of the Zuckerbergs to this purpose. While these charitable than the charitable model in making receive the benefits of a charitable organizations do have limitations on grants to individuals because in the contribution tax deduction at any their ability to lobby, these restrictions former case, such grants would be time is curtailed by the various are not absolute and they can use their treated as taxable gifts subject to a limitations imposed by the Internal funds to invest in for-profit businesses, 40% gift tax.3 Revenue Code. This makes it unlikely and they may make grants to private that the Zuckerbergs will receive the individuals without incurring gift tax. Also, while much has been made full benefit of the deduction. of the ability of the Zuckerbergs to The bottom line is that by not avoid the capital gains tax on the In the case of contributions to public making tax-deductible contributions appreciated, publicly traded Facebook charities, and not the Zuckerbergs’ immediately and instead contributing stock contributed to charities, this presumed private foundation, the the stock to the LLC, the Zuckerbergs benefit would not apply when the aggregate deductible contributions may be foregoing the immediate tax LLC needs to sell the shares in order (including those subject to the benefit they would have received from to generate the cash necessary to separate 20% or 30% limitations contributing directly to one or more make gifts to individuals, to invest discussed below) cannot exceed 50% public charities or their own private in for-profit businesses, and to pay of adjusted gross income (AGI).4 As foundation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inside Silicon Valley's Classrooms of the Future
    february 4/5 2017 Can Silicon Valley really hack education? Hannah Kuchler reports The making of Rodrigo Duterte Why Simon Kuper is boycotting Trump’s America Winter warmers: Honey & Co’s spices Subscribe to the FT HOME WORLD US COMPANIES MARKETS OPINION WORK & CAREERS LIFE & ARTS Sign In Subscribe FT Magazine Add to myFT Read next Tim Hayward Inside Silicon Valley’s classrooms of the future Veggie Pret, London: green without Technology is transforming education, with personalised learning at envy the heart of the curriculum. Is this the future? Pupils at the AltSchool in San Francisco's start-up district © Carlos Chavarría 19 Save FEBRUARY 2, 2017 by: Hannah Kuchler In chalets scattered across the snow in California’s ski country, a school of the future is taking shape. Warm inside a classroom, teenage twins Laurel and Bryce Dettering are part of a Silicon Valley experiment to teach students to outperform machines. Latest in FT Magazine Surrounded by industrial tools, Bryce is Sample the FT’s top laying out green 3D-printed propellers, which stories for a week Tim Hayward will form part of a floating pontoon. The 15- You select the topic, we deliver the Veggie Pret, London: green without news. year-old is struggling to finish a term-long envy challenge to craft a vehicle that could test Select topic water quality remotely. Robert Shrimsley Enter email address School quiz nights: it’s the taking So far, the task has involved coding, part… Sign up manufacturing and a visit to a Nasa By signing up you confirm that you have read contractor who builds under-ice rovers.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware Karen Sbriglio, Firemen’S ) Retirement System of St
    EFiled: Aug 06 2021 03:34PM EDT Transaction ID 66784692 Case No. 2018-0307-JRS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KAREN SBRIGLIO, FIREMEN’S ) RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ST. ) LOUIS, CALIFORNIA STATE ) TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ) CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL ) BUILDING LABORERS’ LOCAL NO. ) 79 GENERAL FUND, CITY OF ) BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND ) RELIEF SYSTEM, and LIDIA LEVY, derivatively on behalf of Nominal ) C.A. No. 2018-0307-JRS Defendant FACEBOOK, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) PUBLIC INSPECTION VERSION ) FILED AUGUST 6, 2021 v. ) ) MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL SANDBERG, PEGGY ALFORD, ) ) MARC ANDREESSEN, KENNETH CHENAULT, PETER THIEL, JEFFREY ) ZIENTS, ERSKINE BOWLES, SUSAN ) DESMOND-HELLMANN, REED ) HASTINGS, JAN KOUM, ) KONSTANTINOS PAPAMILTIADIS, ) DAVID FISCHER, MICHAEL ) SCHROEPFER, and DAVID WEHNER ) ) Defendants, ) -and- ) ) FACEBOOK, INC., ) ) Nominal Defendant. ) SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) I. SUMMARY OF THE ACTION...................................................................... 5 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ....................................................................19 III. PARTIES .......................................................................................................20 A. Plaintiffs ..............................................................................................20 B. Director Defendants ............................................................................26 C. Officer Defendants ..............................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Download Trendswatch
    TRENDSWATCH THE SCENARIO EDITION A TOOL FOR MUSEUM PLANNING TrendsWatch is made possible with generous support from our corporate partners: TRENDSWATCH Table of Contents Introduction . 3 How to Use This Report . 4 Scenarios . 9 Our Bright Future: Idealists and pragmatists work together to build a sustainable world . 11 Fragmentation: Underground activists fight for equity, privacy, and economic reform . 19 A New Equilibrium: Making the best of a world that’s a lot like today, only more so . 27 Wild Times: In which social service nonprofits save the day . 35 Where to Find the Future . .43 Author Credit . 45 About Us and Design Credit . 46 Acknowledgements . 47 About Our Sponsors . .48 © 2018 American Alliance of Museums The text of this report is licensed by the American Alliance of Museums under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4 0. International (CC BY-NC 4 0). License . Attribute to the American Alliance of Museums and include the URL aam-us .org . You are free to: share—copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format adapt—remix, transform, and build upon the material ISBN 978-1-941963-13-5 Supertrees at Singapore’s Gardens by the Bay image (lower left cover, p. 27, p. 33): © Viktoria Diachenko/Shutterstock.com INTRODUCTION 1 “Sometimes reality is too complex. Stories give it form.” —Jean Luc Godard “The human species thinks in metaphors and learns through stories.” —Mary Catherine Bateson TRENDSWATCH INTRODUCTION Welcome to TrendsWatch: The Scenario Edition. This installment of the Alliance’s annual forecasting report takes a break from our usual format. Rather than exploring five or six trends and their implications for society and for museums, in this edition we present four stories of the future, designed to strengthen museum planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Publicação De Dados De Pesquisa Científica: Proposta De Estruturação Semântica De Cadernos Abertos De Pesquisa Frente Às Dimensões Da E-Science
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA JÚLIO MESQUITA FILHO Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação LUCIANA CANDIDA DA SILVA Publicação de Dados de Pesquisa Científica: proposta de estruturação semântica de cadernos abertos de pesquisa frente às dimensões da e-Science Orientador: Professor Dr. José Eduardo Santarem Segundo Marília, SP 2020 UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA JÚLIO MESQUITA FILHO Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação LUCIANA CANDIDA DA SILVA Publicação de Dados de Pesquisa Científica: proposta de estruturação semântica de cadernos abertos de pesquisa frente às dimensões da e-Science Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação da Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio Mesquita Filho como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutora em Ciência da Informação. Orientador: Professor Dr. José Eduardo Santarem Segundo Área de concentração: Informação, Tecnologia e Conhecimento Linha de Pesquisa: Informação e Tecnologia Marília, SP 2020 Catalogação na Publicação Silva, Luciana Candida da. S856p Publicação de dados de pesquisa científica [manuscrito]: proposta de estruturação semântica de cadernos abertos de pesquisa frente às dimensões da e-Science / Luciana Candida da Silva. – Marília, 2020. 243 f. : il. ; 30 cm. Tese (Doutorado) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio Mesquita Filho (PPGCI/UNESP), 2020. Orientador: Prof. Dr. José Eduardo Santarem Segundo. 1. Dados de pesquisa científic a. 2. Cadernos abertos de pesquisa. 3. Web Semântica. 4. Linked Data. 5. e-Science. I. Santarem Segundo, José Eduardo (orientador). II. Título. CDU: 004.65 CDD: 005.73 Luciana Candida da Silva Bibliotecária CRB-1 /1831 Como citar esse documento: SILVA, Luciana Candida da.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    What you get for your dollar January 2019 “Effective Altruism” — What it is, how philanthropic foundations use it and what are its risks and side-effects by Karolin Seitz In parallel to the debate on ‘Aid Effectiveness’ among Ensuring that charitable giving is used for the maximum donor and recipient countries, a new approach, labeled good, is a worthy goal. However, from a human rights “Effective Altruism” (EA) has gained traction in the de- perspective, several concerns arise concerning the un- bate on the impact of development aid. Unlike Aid Ef- derlying assumptions, the methodology and the conse- fectiveness, which involves donor and recipient govern- quences of the practical application of EA. ments, the new approach involves philanthropic institu- tions and their chosen (non-)governmental recipients and This briefing paper provides an overview of the approach explores ways in which funding can be used most effi- underlying EA, how and by whom it is applied and its ciently to have the greatest impact. Its proponents, in- problems and consequences. It concludes that policy cluding new philanthropic entities and so-called ‘venture makers, rather than be guided by its assumptions and philanthropies’ such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Founda- conclusions, must instead concentrate on understand- tion, claim that their funding decisions are based on evi- ing the confounding structural causes of interdependent dence-based results. However, such decisions are primar- global challenges and aim at their long-term solution, ily grounded in cost-benefit considerations, neglecting within an overarching human rights framework. social and cultural considerations and looking at prob- lems in isolation from the wider context.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    IDEAS LEADERSHIP ACTION OUR MISSION 2 Letter from Dan Porterfield, President and CEO WHAT WE DO 6 Policy Programs 16 Leadership Initiatives 20 Public Programs 26 Youth & Engagement Programs 30 Seminars 34 International Partnerships 38 Media Resources THE YEAR IN REVIEW 40 2017-2018 Selected Highlights of the Institute's Work 42 Live on the Aspen Stage INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT 46 Capital Campaigns 48 The Paepcke Society 48 The Heritage Society 50 Society of Fellows 51 Wye Fellows 52 Justice Circle and Arts Circle 55 Philanthropic Partners 56 Supporters STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 90 2017 Annual Report WHO WE ARE 96 Our Locations 98 Aspen Institute Leadership 104 Board of Trustees LETTER FROM DAN PORTERFIELD, PRESIDENT AND CEO A LETTER FROM PRESIDENT AND CEO DAN PORTERFIELD There is nothing quite like the Aspen Institute. It is In the years to come, the Aspen Institute will deepen an extraordinary—and unique—American institution. our impacts. It is crucial that we enhance the devel- We work between fields and across divides as a opment of the young, address the urgent challenges non-profit force for good whose mission is to con- of the future, and renew the ideals of democratic so- vene change-makers of every type, established and ciety. I look forward to working closely with our many emerging, to frame and then solve society’s most partners and friends as we write the next chapter on important problems. We lead on almost every issue the Institute’s scope and leadership for America and with a tool kit stocked for solution-building—always the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 54Th Annual Commencement 54TH
    54th Annual Commencement 54TH Brilliant Future Juris Doctor Degrees MAY 11 Doctor of Medicine Degrees JUNE 1 Master of Fine Arts and Doctoral Degrees JUNE 15 Master’s and Baccalaureate Degrees JUNE 14, 15, 16, 17 Table of Contents 2019 Commencement Schedule of Ceremonies . 3 Chancellor’s Award of Distinction . 4 Message from the Chancellor . 5 Message from the Interim Vice Chancellor, Student Affairs . 6 Deans’ Messages & Ceremonies Claire Trevor School of the Arts. 7-8 School of Biological Sciences . 9-10 The Paul Merage School of Business . 11-12 School of Education . .13-14 Samueli School of Engineering . .15-16 Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences . 17-21 School of Medicine . 18, 20 Sue & Bill Gross School of Nursing . 18, 21 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences . .19, 21 Program in Public Health . .19, 21 School of Humanities . 22-23 Donald Bren School of Information & Computer Sciences . 24-25 School of Law . 26-27 School of Physical Sciences . .28-29 School of Social Ecology . 30-31 School of Social Sciences . 32-33 Graduate Division . .34-35 List of Graduates Advanced Degree Candidates . 36 Undergraduate Degree Candidates Claire Trevor School of the Arts. 47 School of Biological Sciences . .48 The Paul Merage School of Business . 52 School of Education . 54 The Henry Samueli School of Engineering . 55 School of Humanities . .60 Donald Bren School of Information & Computer Sciences . 63 Sue & Bill Gross School of Nursing . 67 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 67 School of Physical Sciences . 68 Program in Public Health . 70 School of Social Ecology . 73 School of Social Sciences .
    [Show full text]
  • CZI Community Fund Application Guidelines About the Chan
    CZI Community Fund Application Guidelines About the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Community Fund The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative believes that every child should grow up in a better world, and that our mission should begin close to home. Our giving in the Bay Area is guided by the belief that those most impacted by challenges should be guiding the development of solutions. To that end, we have been working with local leaders and supporting community organizations in the San Francisco Bay Area since our founding. While our work to-date to address some of the most pressing challenges in our backyard has focused on education and affordable housing, we are now exploring additional ways to build stronger, more equitable communities. Based on what we have learned and heard through our engagement with local residents and leaders in Belle Haven, East Palo Alto, North Fair Oaks, and Redwood City, we are launching the CZI Community Fund to support locally driven solutions. This fund will award grants of up to $100,000 to respond to community needs around education, housing, homelessness, immigration, transportation, and workforce development — areas identified by local residents and leaders as top priorities. Eligible requests will be evaluated according to the Fund Criteria below. Final grant amounts will vary and be determined by the scale and scope of the submitted proposal, and organizational capacity, as well as the number of qualified applications submitted to the Fund. Fund Criteria All applications will be evaluated based on the following criteria: • Alignment with Communities’ Priority Issue Areas - Preference will be given to organizations and projects tackling the issues of education, housing, homelessness, immigration, transportation, and/or workforce development within the Fund's eligible communities (Belle Haven, East Palo Alto, North Fair Oaks, Redwood City).
    [Show full text]
  • Zuckerberg's Shine Dims As Guardian of Facebook Users 23 March 2018
    Zuckerberg's shine dims as guardian of Facebook users 23 March 2018 Facebook has prospered on digital advertising that benefits from being able to use what people share about themselves to target ads. If Facebook was betting on people's better natures when it came to truthfully sharing, respecting others, and being able to connect with anyone, it wasn't always a winning wager. The California-based social network has been a flashpoint for controversies about bullying, harassment, free speech, extremist propaganda, election meddling, privacy, and more. "They don't put enough effort into making sure the The latest crisis laying siege to Facebook has raised the user is protected and the experience is assured," specter that Mark Zuckerberg has lost control of his analyst Enderle said. creation and been naive about the unintended consequences of people sharing so much about "They only care about the advertisers, and the user themselves is basically a digital slave." Dropout to billionaire Mark Zuckerberg rose to wealth and fame with a A public apology by Zuckerberg failed to quell mission of connecting everyone through Facebook, outrage over the hijacking of personal data from but now faces the wrath of users outraged he isn't millions of people, as critics demanded that the doing more to defend their data. social media giant go much further to protect user privacy. The latest crisis laying siege to the leading online social network has raised the specter that he has Belatedly speaking out about the harvesting of lost control of his creation and been naive about Facebook user data by a British firm linked to the unintended consequences of people sharing so President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign, much about themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire Next Door
    Florida Law Review Volume 70 Issue 5 Article 1 October 2019 Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire Next Door Dana Brakman Reiser Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Dana Brakman Reiser, Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire Next Door, 70 Fla. L. Rev. 921 (2019). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol70/iss5/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized editor of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reiser: Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability C DISRUPTIVE PHILANTHROPY: CHAN-ZUCKERBERG, THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND THE MILLIONAIRE NEXT DOOR Dana Brakman Reiser* Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Dr. Priscilla Chan, have pledged to give 99% of their net worth to—in their words— “advance[e] human potential and promot[e] equal opportunity.” To make good on this promise, however, they did not set up a traditional nonprofit, tax-exempt organization. Instead, they founded the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative, a limited liability company (LLC). The bulk of this Article provides the definitive explanation for this seemingly bizarre choice. Importantly, the philanthropy LLC structure offers donors the flexibility to bolster charitable grantmaking with impact investment and political advocacy, free of the restrictions, penalties, and transparency requirements applied to tax-exempt vehicles. The LLC form also provides donors complete control over the organizations they found, including an ability to reclaim donated assets that is absolutely prohibited in traditional forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope Meets with Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg
    Pope meets with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg By Junno Arocho Esteves Catholic News Service VATICAN CITY – Continuing his dialogue with leaders in the world of social media and technology, Pope Francis met with Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, met the pope Aug. 29 in the Domus Sanctae Marthae, where the pope lives. “It is an honor to be with you today,” Zuckerberg told the pope, adding that he hoped to help spread the pope’s “message of mercy and tenderness.” He also presented Pope Francis with a model replica of Aquila, a solar-powered aircraft that will beam internet connectivity to areas with limited or no connection. Greg Burke, Vatican spokesman, said the pope and Zuckerberg spoke about “how communications technology can be used to alleviate poverty, encourage a culture of encounter and help deliver a message of hope, especially to the most disadvantaged people.” Pope Francis presented Zuckerberg and his wife with a copy of “The Name of God is Mercy,” a book-length interview he did with Italian journalist, Andrea Tornielli. In the book, he told them, “are my thoughts on tenderness and mercy.” In a message posted on his personal Facebook page, Zuckerberg expressed his admiration for the pope and “how he’s found new ways to communicate with people of every faith around the world.” “It was a meeting we’ll never forget. You can feel his warmth and kindness, and how deeply he cares about helping people,” Zuckerberg wrote. Throughout his papacy, the pope has highlighted the importance of social networks as a means to “facilitate relationships” while warning of their ability to “lead to further polarization and division” if used incorrectly.
    [Show full text]
  • An Instagram Content Analysis for City Branding in London and Florence
    Title page An Instagram Content Analysis for City Branding in London and Florence Diletta Acuti University of Florence Via delle Pandette, 9 Florence, Italy [email protected] Valentina Mazzoli University of Florence Via delle Pandette, 9, Florence, Italy [email protected] Raffaele Donvito University of Florence Via delle Pandette, 9, Florence, Italy [email protected] Priscilla Chan Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester Fashion Institute, Righton Building, Cavendish Street, Manchester M15 6BG, United Kingdom [email protected] 1 An Instagram Content Analysis for City Branding in London and Florence Abstract This paper aims to understand how User Generated Contents (UGC) affect the process of place branding, identifying the main associations of various actors related to London and Florence, both traditionally linked to the fashion industry. In particular, this study focuses on fashion as a city image component that contributes to the construction of the image of London and Florence. This research applies a content analysis of visual information (pictures) and textual information (hashtags) available on social networks (i.e. Instagram), typing the hashtags #London and #Florence, to reconstruct the brand image of these two cities. As the recent literature has argued for brands or products, even for places and cities, it is important to monitor the perceived city brand image resulting from the overall online experience, especially on social media. This paper is one of the first to apply content analysis on Instagram in relation to city branding, where the core of communication is based on images. Therefore, in contrast to previous studies, this work principally focuses on visual communication, as a form of textual paralanguage communication, for the construction of a city image for London and Florence.
    [Show full text]