GAO-02-914T Military and Veterans' Benefits: Observations on The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GAO-02-914T Military and Veterans' Benefits: Observations on The United States General Accounting Office GAO Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Benefits, Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EST, Thursday, July 18, 2002 MILITARY AND VETERANS’ BENEFITS Observations on the Transition Assistance Program Statement of Cynthia A. Bascetta, Director Education, Workforce, and Income Security Issues GAO-02-914T Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: Thank you for inviting me to discuss the military’s transition assistance program, which the Congress established in 1990 during a time of military downsizing to help service men and women return to civilian life. Since its inception, the program has served over one million separating and retiring military personnel and has been administered through the coordinated efforts of the Departments of Defense (DOD), Transportation (DOT), Labor (DOL), and Veterans Affairs (VA). In fiscal year 2001, the military branches and DOL spent approximately $47.5 million to provide transition assistance to about 222,000 separating and retiring service members. Today, I will describe the transition assistance offered by each military branch and how their transition assistance programs and services differ. I will also discuss what is known about how well program objectives, such as transitioning to civilian employment, have been met. To conduct our work, we analyzed program descriptions and administrative data from documentation provided by DOD, DOT, DOL, and VA. We also conducted structured group interviews during fieldwork at five locations, one at each military branch—the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard.1 We talked to about 70 service members, including separatees and retirees as well as members expected to separate with a disability, who had participated in the transition assistance workshop. At each location, we also interviewed commanding officers, supervisors, and transition assistance program staff. While all military branches were represented, we cannot generalize from this information. In addition, we did not interview service members who did not receive transition assistance services. Finally, we reviewed existing studies of the transition assistance program. Our work was conducted from March 2002 through July 2002, in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. In summary, while each branch of the military provides required pre- separation counseling and offers transition assistance workshops to help service members transition to civilian life, not all eligible service members 1 We conducted structured group interviews at Camp LeJeune, North Carolina; Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland; Fort Stewart, Georgia; Naval Air Station in Jacksonville, Florida; and U.S. Coast Guard Integrated Support Command Miami, Florida. We observed a transition assistance program workshop at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland. We also observed disabled transition assistance program workshops at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland and at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in the District of Columbia. Page 1 GAO-02-914T receive transition assistance. Because the military branches have considerable flexibility in designing their programs to address the perceived needs of their service members, transition assistance varies in content and delivery across the military branches. For example, the Army uses contract staff and interactive job assistance tools to provide the level of employment-related assistance it believes many of its service members need. In addition, service members experience differences in access to transition assistance depending on their unique circumstances. For example, service members who receive transition assistance while stationed at remote locations often receive less extensive transition assistance than what is available at other locations. Service members we talked to liked the services they received, and several studies confirm participant satisfaction with transition assistance. However, isolating the impact of transition assistance on employment, education, and other outcomes is difficult because of data inadequacies and methodological challenges. Only two program evaluations from the early 1990s evaluated the effectiveness of transition assistance on employment and provided limited information. Moreover, they did not evaluate the impact of transition assistance on other potential goals, including recruitment and retention, which could have growing importance now that the military is no longer downsizing. Background When the Congress established the transition assistance program in 1990,2 significant reductions in military force levels were expected. The law noted that many of these service personnel specialized in critical skills, such as combat arms, which would not transfer to the civilian workforce. Transition assistance, including employment and job training services, was established to help such service members make suitable educational and career choices as they readjusted to civilian life. The law directed DOL, DOD, and VA to jointly administer the program. To do so, the agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which spelled out each agency’s role in the provision of services to members of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. When the Coast Guard started to operate the transition assistance program in 1994, DOT entered into a similar agreement with VA and DOL. 2 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991, P.L. 101-510, November 5, 1990. Page 2 GAO-02-914T Each branch of the military is required to provide pre-separation counseling to all military personnel no later than 90 days prior to their separation from the military. Pre-separation counseling, according to the law, shall include information about education and vocational rehabilitation benefits, selective reserve options, job counseling and job search and placement information, relocation assistance services, medical and dental benefits, counseling on the effects of career change, and financial planning. The military branches are to provide space for the provision of transition services at locations with more than 500 active duty personnel. Separating service members must complete a pre-separation counseling checklist indicating that they have been informed of the services available to them and, on this checklist, they are to indicate the services they wish to receive, including if they wish to participate in the transition assistance workshop. For locations in the United States, DOL is responsible for providing transition assistance workshops, which are generally 3-day training sessions focusing primarily on resume writing and job search strategies and includes a manual with basic information on the material covered in the workshop.3 The MOU identifies specific workshop objectives, including preventing and reducing long-term unemployment, reducing unemployment compensation paid to veterans, and improving retention. DOL spent about $5 million in fiscal year 2001 to provide about 3,200 workshops, in addition to the funding spent on transition assistance by the military branches shown in table 1. The workshop and other transition services are to be accessible to service members two years prior to retirement and one year prior to separation.4 As part of the transition assistance workshop, VA is responsible for providing information on veterans’ benefits, including information on disability benefits. VA is also responsible for providing more detailed information and assistance to those service members separating or retiring due to a disability. 3 When available these seminars are facilitated by Local Veterans Employment Representatives (LVER) or Disabled Veterans Outreach Program (DVOP) specialists, federally funded staff, who are part of states’ employment service systems and provide direct employment services to eligible veterans. If they are unavailable, federal DOL staff or a DOL contractor facilitates the transition assistance workshop. At overseas locations, the workshops are facilitated by DOD. 4 Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, P.L. 107-103, Dec. 27, 2001, extended from 6 months to 1 year for separatees and from 1 year to 2 years for retirees, the time prior to separation that service members may access transition assistance. Page 3 GAO-02-914T Table 1: Transition Assistance Funding by Military Branch, Fiscal Year 2001 Army Air Force Marine Navy Coast Guard Total Funding (in millions)a DOD 13.5 8.9 4.0 10.3 0.0 36.7 Other 5.3b 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5c 5.8 Total 18.8 8.9 4.0 10.3 0.5 42.5 Transition Assistance Workshopsd Number held 1,207 1,115 520 1,075 33 3,950 Length (in days) 2-3 3 3-4 4 4 N/A Average class size 24 25 41 38 35 N/A a These amounts do not include DOL or VA funding, DOD overhead expenditures or any resources contributed by local installations. b The Army provides funds to supplement transition assistance. c This amount includes funds from both Coast Guard Headquarters and local Coast Guard installations. d These numbers include both DOL facilitated and contractor facilitated workshops in the U.S. and DOD facilitated workshops overseas. Source: DOD and DOT. In 1996, Congress established the Commission on Servicemembers and Veterans Transition Assistance and directed it to review programs that provide benefits and services to veterans and service members making the transition to civilian life. The Transition Commission examined pre- separation counseling and transition assistance program workshops
Recommended publications
  • A Textual Analysis of US Army and US Navy Recruiting Advertisements From
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 The changing face of the U.S. military: a textual analysis of U.S. Army and U.S. Navy recruiting advertisements from pre-9-11 to six years into the Iraq War Maryann M. Rowland Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Rowland, Maryann M., "The changing face of the U.S. military: a textual analysis of U.S. Army and U.S. Navy recruiting advertisements from pre-9-11 to six years into the Iraq War" (2009). LSU Master's Theses. 1151. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1151 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHANGING FACE OF THE U.S. MILITARY: A TEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF U.S. ARMY AND U.S. NAVY RECRUITING ADVERTISEMENTS FROM PRE-9-11 TO SIX YEARS INTO THE IRAQ WAR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Mass Communication in The Manship School of Mass Communication by Maryann Rowland B.A., University of Central Florida, 2006 May 2009 AKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this thesis would not have been possible without the help and support of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • From Representation to Inclusion: Diversity Leadership for the 21St-Century Military
    From representation to inclusion: Diversity leadership for the 21st-Century Military Final RepoRt From representation to inclusion: Diversity leadership for the 21st-Century Military Final RepoRt MILITARY LEADERSHIP DIVERSITY COMMISSION 1851 South Bell Street Arlington, VA 22202 March 15, 2011 The Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United States The 112th United States Congress Mr. President and Members of Congress: The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 established the Military Leadership Diversity Commission. The Commission was asked to conduct a comprehen- sive evaluation and assessment of policies and practices that shape diversity among mili- tary leaders. Sixteen interrelated tasks, given by Congress, informed the Commission’s enclosed final report, From Representation to Inclusion: Diversity Leadership for the 21st- Century Military. As chairman of this Commission, I am proud to present this report for your consideration. The Commission held itself to high standards of openness and transparency in all deliberations. Moreover, we modeled inclusiveness by inviting those with diverse back- grounds, expertise, and experience to have a say in our independent analysis. The Com- mission sought extensive input for our deliberations from the Department of Defense and the Services as well as the private sector. We hosted 13 public hearings, meeting in loca- tions across the country where many active-duty servicemembers and veterans reside. We heard public testimony from top military leaders, subject matter experts, and diversity officers from leading corporations known for their diversity practices. In addition, we con- ducted interviews with servicemembers. The Commission believes that the diversity of our servicemembers is the unique strength of our military.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Branch Drug DUI Other Property Sex Violence Grand Total
    Nevada Department of Corrections Male Population of Veteran Offenders by Offense Group June 30, 2019 1 Military Branch Drug DUI Other Property Sex Violence Grand Total Air Force 4 6 6 5 57 29 107 Army 26 18 17 38 159 130 388 Coast Guard 1 1 1 3 3 9 Marine Corps 6 12 5 22 33 73 151 National Guard 3 1 2 7 16 29 Navy 15 5 3 15 83 62 183 Total Veterans 55 43 31 83 342 313 867 % 6.34% 4.96% 3.58% 9.57% 39.45% 36.10% 100.00% Non Veterans 1,218 321 643 1,667 1,561 4,721 10,131 % 12.02% 3.17% 6.35% 16.45% 15.41% 46.60% 100.00% Unknown 72 9 19 63 255 690 1,108 % 6.50% 0.81% 1.71% 5.69% 23.01% 62.27% 100.00% Grand Total 1,345 373 693 1,813 2,158 5,724 12,106 % 11.11% 3.08% 5.72% 14.98% 17.83% 47.28% 100.00% 1 The military branch category from the most current NDOC prison booking. 2 Source: Nevada Department of Corrections, Offender Management Daily data warehouse. 11/6/2019 NDOC Page 1 Nevada Department of Corrections Male Population of Veteran Offenders by Type of Confinement June 30, 2019 1 2 3 Military Branch Institutional Confinement Other Confinement Total Air Force 107 107 Army 379 9 388 Coast Guard 9 9 Marine Corps 146 5 151 National Guard 28 1 29 Navy 181 2 183 Total Veterans 850 17 867 1 The military branch category from the most current NDOC prison booking.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Army Air Service During World War I's Hundred Days
    University of Washington Tacoma UW Tacoma Digital Commons History Undergraduate Theses History Winter 3-12-2020 The American Army Air Service During World War I's Hundred Days Offensive: Looking at Reconnaissance, Bombing and Pursuit Aviation in the Saint-Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne Operations. Duncan Hamlin [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/history_theses Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Hamlin, Duncan, "The American Army Air Service During World War I's Hundred Days Offensive: Looking at Reconnaissance, Bombing and Pursuit Aviation in the Saint-Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne Operations." (2020). History Undergraduate Theses. 44. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/history_theses/44 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UW Tacoma Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of UW Tacoma Digital Commons. The American Army Air Service During World War I's Hundred Days Offensive: Looking at Reconnaissance, Bombing and Pursuit Aviation in the Saint-Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne Operations. A Senior Paper Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation Undergraduate History Program of the University of Washington By Duncan Hamlin University of Washington Tacoma 2020 Advisor: Dr. Nicoletta Acknowledgments I would first like to thank Dr. Burghart and Dr. Nicoletta for guiding me along with this project. This has been quite the process for me, as I have never had to write a paper this long and they both provided a plethora of sources, suggestions and answers when I needed them.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: Military Service
    Country Policy and Information Note Turkey: Military service Version 2.0 September 2018 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the basis of claim section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis of COI; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Analysis This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment on whether, in general: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x Claims are likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • RECRUITING for DIFFERENCE and DIVERSITY in the U.S. MILITARY by JEREMIAH B. FAVARA a DISSERTATION Presented to the School of J
    RECRUITING FOR DIFFERENCE AND DIVERSITY IN THE U.S. MILITARY by JEREMIAH B. FAVARA A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Jeremiah B. Favara Title: Recruiting for Difference and Diversity in the U.S. Military This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the School of Journalism and Communication by: Carol Stabile Chair Gretchen Soderlund Core Member Christopher Chávez Core Member Dan HoSang Core Member CJ Pascoe Institutional Representative and Sara D. Hodges Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2017. ii © 2017 Jeremiah B. Favara iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Jeremiah B. Favara Doctor of Philosophy School of Journalism and Communication September 2017 Title: Recruiting for Difference and Diversity in the U.S. Military After shifting to an all-volunteer force (AVF) in 1973, the U.S. military was forced to expand recruiting efforts beyond the ideal figure of the white male soldier in order to meet personnel needs. Shaped by the economic realities of the AVF, such recruiting efforts sought to show individuals historically excluded from military service, namely women and people of color, that there was a place for them in the military. The presence of women and people of color in recruitment materials contributes to ideals of citizenship and articulates understanding of gender, race, sexuality, and class in relation to military inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • First Last Class Year Military Branch Rank Community Leadership
    Community Leadership Course for Veterans Participant Roster First Last Class Year Military Branch Rank Laura Anthony CLCV V Army O-2 Erinn Black CLCV V Air Force E-5 Samantha Brillon CLCV V Army E-4 Justin Burdette CLCV V Marine Corps O-2 Anthony Canzonieri CLCV V Army E-4 Derrick Clark Sr. CLCV V Navy E-3 David Clay Jr. CLCV V Army O-3 David Coogan CLCV V Marine Corps O-3 Nicole Dawson CLCV V Army E-6 Laura Goossen CLCV V Army O-1 Brian Greenert CLCV V Navy O-3 Leonard Hammonds II CLCV V Marine Corps E-3 Timothy Jones CLCV V Navy E-4 Alexander Kabusk CLCV V Army Reserves O-1 Leonard Kistler CLCV V Air Force E-6 Charles Lynch CLCV V Army E-5 Nathan Mallory CLCV V Air Force E-5 Daniel McCafferty CLCV V Army E-6 Sean McCann CLCV V Marine Corps O-2 Daniel Restivo CLCV V Marine Corps E-4 Nicholas Boyko CLCV IV Marine Corps E-4 David Cain CLCV IV Marine Corps E-6 Matthew Darwin CLCV IV Marine Corps E-3 Adam Davila CLCV IV Marine Corps O-3 Patricia Gerhauser CLCV IV Navy E-4 Brenda Kietzer CLCV IV Air Force E-4 Raymond Leonard CLCV IV Marine Corps O-3 Michael Mason CLCV IV Army National Guard E-5 Nicole McAfoose CLCV IV Air National Guard E-6 Erik Orient CLCV IV Marine Corps O-3 Joseph Ott CLCV IV Army E-8 Shantel Rodney CLCV IV Army National Guard E-6 Adam Salinas CLCV IV Army O-3 Jessica Stahl CLCV IV Army National Guard O-3 William Steele CLCV IV Marine Corps O-4 Brenden Stokes CLCV IV Air Force E-5 Joshua Stuart CLCV IV Army E-5 Justin Thomas CLCV IV Army Reserves E-4 Lee Wagner CLCV IV Marine Corps O-2 Ryan Ahl CLCV III Army E-6 Daniel
    [Show full text]
  • The Gender Power Structure of the U.S. Military: a Feminist Institutionalism Analysis
    The Gender Power Structure of the U.S. Military: A Feminist Institutionalism Analysis Nicole Brunner PhD University of York Politics October 2013 Abstract This thesis provides a feminist institutionalism analysis of the gendered power structure of the U.S. military. It argues that femininity is placed in a disadvantaged position to masculinity in the U.S. Armed Forces, even as formal policies evolve and move the U.S. military toward formal gender equality. This thesis utilises aspects of new institutionalism theory to analyse how institutional change has occurred in respect to the gender power structure. It explicates processes of change that have occurred in the U.S. military and highlights the role of both agency and structure in the evolution of the institution. It also explores what factors of the institution continue to discriminate against women in order to explain why more change has not yet occurred, as of 2013. In order to evaluate the above issues, this thesis draws on data from interview and survey respondents to explicate their experiences in order to provide a clear picture of the masculine-oriented informal norms of the U.S. military institution. It also provides a case study of sexual assault in the military to evaluate the tension between stagnant informal norms and advancing formal policies. This thesis argues that the disadvantaged status of women in the U.S. military can be explained by evaluating the past formal policies and informal norms and values of the U.S. Armed Forces. 2 Table of Contents Abstract......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • After Harvard: Considering Military Service
    After Harvard: Considering Military Service A publication of the Harvard Veterans Alumni Organization comprised of Harvard graduate students and alumni. Ofce of Career Services, Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences: www.ocs.fas.harvard.edu Dear Reader, As veterans of the military who are now part of the Harvard community, we know how daunting the decision to join America’s armed forces can be. This is especially true at a place like Harvard where military service is definitely the path less traveled. We know the questions are numerous. What is life in the military really like? Should I join the Army or the Marine Corps? What will it mean for my future career if I spend four years in the military after my time at Harvard? Who should I talk to about this decision? These are just some of the countless questions that people who have never served and people who have never been to Harvard just have a tough time helping you answer. This pamphlet was put together by a group of Harvard graduate students, many of whom attended Harvard College, served in the US military, and came back to campus to attend one of Harvard’s various graduate programs. In it, they seek to provide you with answers to the questions and access to the resources that they wish they had known about when they were in your shoes. This pamphlet is not recruiting material. Rather, it is meant to be straight talk about military service and what it means to serve in the military after attending a school like Harvard.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contractual Approach to the Military's Conscientious Objection Rules Alexander Drylewski
    Brooklyn Law Review Volume 74 | Issue 4 Article 4 2009 When Fighting Is Impossible: A Contractual Approach to the Military's Conscientious Objection Rules Alexander Drylewski Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr Recommended Citation Alexander Drylewski, When Fighting Is Impossible: A Contractual Approach to the Military's Conscientious Objection Rules, 74 Brook. L. Rev. (2009). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol74/iss4/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Law Review by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. NOTES When Fighting Is Impossible A CONTRACTUAL APPROACH TO THE MILITARY’S CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION RULES Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes . known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare. —James Madison1 Sometime they’ll give a war and nobody will come. —Carl Sandburg2 I. INTRODUCTION Presently, the United States stands alone as the world’s unquestioned global military leader.3 Its military presence is felt through over 820 installments in at least 39 countries.4 The United States’ active duty military consists of approximately 1.38 million personnel equipped with the most advanced and effective combat-related technology in the world.5 In order to maintain and further this global preeminence, the military relies on a constant and substantial influx of new members— men and women willing to dedicate themselves to serving their country, both in times of war and peace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Includes a Combination of Classroom Instruction, Field Exercises, and Physical Training
    Options for HS Graduates Training and Education Basic Training u Basic training is 8 – 12 weeks of intense physical and mental preparation. u Also known as Boot Camp, Basic Training The Military includes a combination of classroom instruction, field exercises, and physical training. u Enlistees learn discipline, physical endurance, and respect for authority. Advance Individual Training (AIT) Qualifications u After basic training, enlistees typically go to Advance Individual Training where they receive Basic qualifications instruction and training for a specific job. u High school diploma (GED candidates have u Advance training can last a few weeks or several limited opportunities) months. u 18 years old (17 with parental consent) u Enlistees are trained in occupational fields such u US citizen or Permanent Resident Alien as accounting, communications, computers, healthcare, construction, law enforcement, Physical requirements mechanical repair, and culinary service. u Good physical condition u Appropriate weight u Able to pass a physical exam For More Information The best way to learn about the military is to talk ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational to a recruiter. The career, training, and educational Aptitude Battery) opportunities are different for each branch, so talk u The ASVAB is a 3-hour test designed to to recruiters representing two or more branches identify a person’s aptitudes, abilities, and of the military. strengths. For information on opportunities in the u To enlist in any branch of the military, one military, go to todaysmilitary.com. must earn a minimum score on the ASVAB. u Recruiters generally make the testing Create your future! arrangements and interpret ASVAB scores.
    [Show full text]