Harry Kenrick: the First Warden of the Te Aroha Mining District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harry Kenrick: the First Warden of the Te Aroha Mining District HARRY KENRICK: THE FIRST WARDEN OF THE TE AROHA MINING DISTRICT Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 52 Revised at August 25, 2016 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 HARRY KENRICK: THE FIRST WARDEN OF THE TE AROHA MINING DISTRICT Abstract: Because of his improvident father, Harry Kenrick left England for the Victorian goldfields before moving to the South Island of New Zealand. In 1865, he settled in the West Coast to begin a lifetime career of working for the government. In addition to his official duties, he was involved in mining and assisted to develop the district, becoming involved in disputes that foreshadowed his experiences at Thames. Appointed as resident magistrate for Poverty Bay in 1877, his work was praised, as it had been on the West Coast, but two years later he was abruptly moved to Thames to become both magistrate and warden after the forced resignation of his predecessor, William Fraser. The latter’s career is examined, as is how his clique hated Kenrick for replacing him; but most residents welcomed a man whose decisions were seen as fair and just. Fraser retained support amongst many in the community, becoming mayor and then a member of parliament, but continued to snipe at Kenrick, supported by a small number of malcontents, who made his life difficult. In his determination to make his subordinates perform their duties satisfactorily, Kenrick provoked conflict with Hugh McIlhone, Inspector of Miners’ Rights, and James Monteith McLaren, Inspector of Mines. They were supported by two prominent Thames residents, Louis Ehrenfried, a brewer and local government politician, and George Nathaniel Brassey, a solicitor, who spent years trying to undermine Kenrick for their own personal advantage. In 1880 and 1885, two petitions to remove him failed miserably, as his reputation both locally and with the government and its officials had risen steadily. Kenrick improved mining regulations and enforced them fairly, as even some who lost cases accepted. At Te Aroha, after some initial criticisms he became popular because of his efforts to be fair to all who came before him in court and his assistance both to mining and to the development of the district. His efforts to assist Maori made him popular with them as well, and when he died, prematurely, he was deeply mourned by both Maori and Pakeha. INTRODUCTION 2 As both mining warden and resident magistrate, Harry Kenrick was one of the most important officials in Hauraki. As would be expected, despite his attempts to be fair to all parties not all his decisions would please everyone, but in his case the partisans of his predecessor made his life unnecessarily stressful. That after his premature death he was widely mourned was a tribute both to his success and to his personality. HIS LIFE BEFORE BEING POSTED TO THAMES Harry Kenrick was born in or about 1834 (civil registration did not start until 1837), in Southwark, Surrey, to Richard Kyffyn Kenrick, of Nant-y-clwyd Hall (otherwise Nantclwyd or Nant Clwyd), in the vale of Nangollen, Denbighshire, North Wales, and Mary Robinson Bromley, of Deptford, Kent.1 He was reputedly ‘well-educated’.2 Because of his father’s financial difficulties, ‘owing to gambling debts and extravagance’, the bailiffs were ‘frequent visitors sometimes received with firearms, or again with friendly chaff, when a stream, the boundary between two counties, protected the object of their search’.3 Subsequently, his father fled Wales to live in a series of English hotels before being imprisoned in two London debtors’ prisons, the Fleet and the Queen’s Bench, at least as early as 1841 (when aged 42) and at least until 1843.4 In 1852, his father sold Nant-y-clwyd Hall, and in September that year the family arrived in Melbourne, Australia, on the ‘Thomas Lowrie’, and went to the Bendigo diggings.5 Kenrick had ‘some success’ as a gold miner, 1 http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/woore.html; Death Certificate of Harry Kenrick, 31 July 1886, 1886/3468, BDM; family tree devised by Robert Harry Kenrick Christie, n.d., Malcolm Christie Collection; Grey River Argus, 9 December 1871, p. 2; Te Aroha News, 21 March 1932, p. 5. 2 D.N. Hawkins, Beyond the Waimakariri: A regional history (Christchurch, 1957), p. 178. 3 Recorded on family tree devised by Robert Harry Kenrick Christie, n.d., Malcolm Christie Collection. 4 Queen’s Bench Prison, Southwark, London, Census of England, 1841, ancestry.co.uk; London Gazette, 25 April 1843, p. 1384; Margaret Blount to Philip Hart, 7 October 2011, email; David Bowman to Philip Hart, 8 November 2011, email. 5 http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/woore.html; Hawkins, p. 178; ‘Unassisted Shipping’, Victoria Index, Public Record Office, Victoria, information provided in Robert Ashley to Philip Hart, 18 June 2005, email; Margaret Blount to Philip Hart, 22 May 2008, email. 3 and his ‘eventful’ life in Victoria ‘included participation in the Eureka Stockade affair’.6 His descendants believed he was a friend of Peter Lalor, the main leader of the rebellious miners,7 meaning that he supported those fighting the government. ‘After varied experiences in the pursuit of the precious metal for about three years, he resolved upon leaving Australia and returned to England’,8 presumably with his parents, for his father would prosecute his wife for adultery in 1857 and die in London in 1860, where his mother remarried six years later.9 After two years in England, Kenrick arrived on the ‘Westminster’ in Canterbury, New Zealand, in January 1858, and immediately enquired, with other passengers, about milling timber at Rangiora.10 With one partner, he acquired the Rangiora sawmill in 1859, and with another partner moved it to Oxford to be the first sawmill working the Harewood Forest (later East Oxford) from April 1860 onwards.11 They had already purchased 390 acres of bush.12 His partner handled the office work, Kenrick the mill; all the cutting rights to the Harewood Forest were in his name.13 In 1891, one of the first mill workers recalled working in Kenrick’s mill: When I arrived in Oxford the first mill was getting ready to start. The wages were 7/- a day, which we sometimes got, but the price of necessities was 50 per cent above present rates. I have a keen recollection of a venerable and respected resident bringing us our weekly supply of mutton in a dray drawn by ‘Whiskey,” a bullock who has long since gone the way of all beef. We paid for the mutton 7d a pound. Bread you could either bake or go without, 6 Thames Advertiser, 2 August 1886, p. 2; Hawkins, p. 178. 7 Evelyn Walker to Mollie Christie, November 1990, Malcolm Christie Papers. 8 Te Aroha News, 21 August 1886, Supplement, p. 3. 9 http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/woore.html; Mary Blount to Philip Hart, 5 October 2011, 7 October 2011, emails; Reynolds Newspaper, 8 February 1857, cited in http://www.wbcollyer.org/. 10 Death Certificate of Harry Kenrick, 31 July 1886, 1886/3468, BDM; D.N. Hawkins, Rangiora: The passing years and people in a Canterbury country town (Rangiora, 1983), p. 91. 11 Advertisement, Lyttleton Times, 18 April 1869, p. 5; Hawkins, Rangiora, p. 97; Hawkins, Beyond the Waimakariri, pp. 41, 160, 178. 12 Lancelot Watson, The Story of Oxford 1852-1932 (Christchurch, 1932), p. 16. 13 Oliver A. Gillespie, Oxford: The first hundred years (Christchurch, 1977), pp. 58-61. 4 while other stores had to be procured either from Rangiora or from West Oxford, where there was a sort of store where the prices were double what they are now, and the quality worse.14 According to an obituary, ‘in the end the speculation turned out unprofitable’.15 Their selling unseasoned timber for telegraph poles made officials ‘loath to deal with them again’.16 In March 1863 Kenrick ended his partnership,17 and transferred his interest to a brother (another Richard Kyffen Kenrick),18 a carter who had arrived from Australia in 1862 and had been transporting logs for him; ‘a racing and gambling man’, Richard went bankrupt, forcing the sale of the mill in 1865.19 Three years later, Richard was chosen as the local poundkeeper.20 When a shipping agent at Castlepoint in 1880, he became bankrupt again, owing £4,758 14s 5d; his assets were a life insurance policy and furniture valued at £10, both mortgaged to a creditor.21 Richard Kyffin-Kenrick, as his surname was recorded, would die in Auckland in 1898.22 A younger brother, Orlando, who left London in October 1858 to work in this sawmill, later served in the New Zealand land wars before becoming a captain of cargo boats on the Murray River in Australia.23 Kenrick erected the first timber house, previous habitations being ‘of a primitive and varied character’, mostly constructed out of ‘sods or slabs, and with a thatched roof, the windows being sometimes made with calico’.24 The 14 Watson, p. 110. 15 Te Aroha News, 21 August 1886, Supplement, p. 3. 16 Hawkins, Beyond the Waimakariri, p. 183. 17 Advertisement, Press, 28 March 1863, p. 5. 18 http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/woore.html. 19 Hawkins, Beyond the Waimakariri, p. 180; Gillespie, pp. 61-62. 20 Watson, p. 34. 21 Bankruptcy File, AAOM W3843, 17885, 99/1255, ANZ-W. 22 Death Notice, Auckland Weekly News, 11 November 1898, p. 1. 23 ‘Pioneer Days’, Grey River Argus, 11 June 1914, p.
Recommended publications
  • Mercer Morgue (Former), MERCER (List No
    New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero – Report for a Historic Place Mercer Morgue (Former), MERCER (List No. 1560, Category 2) Mercer Morgue (Former), looking southeast from Glass Road (Martin Jones, HNZPT, 18 March 2021) Martin Jones Last amended 15 June 2021 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. IDENTIFICATION 4 1.1. Name of Place 4 1.2. Location Information 4 1.3. Legal Description 5 1.4. Extent of List Entry 5 1.5. Eligibility 5 1.6. Existing Heritage Recognition 5 2. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 6 2.1. Historical Information 6 2.2. Physical Information 16 2.3. Chattels 26 2.4. Sources 26 3. SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT 27 3.1. Section 66 (1) Assessment 27 3.2. Section 66 (3) Assessment 28 4. APPENDICES 31 4.1. Appendix 1: Visual Identification Aids 31 4.2. Appendix 2: Visual Aids to Historical Information 34 4.3. Appendix 3: Visual Aids to Physical Information 34 4.4. Appendix 4: Significance Assessment Information 34 Disclaimer Please note that entry on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero identifies only the heritage values of the property concerned, and should not be construed as advice on the state of the property, or as a comment of its soundness or safety, including in regard to earthquake risk, safety in the event of fire, or insanitary conditions. Archaeological sites are protected by the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014, regardless of whether they are entered on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rārangi Kōrero or not. Archaeological sites include ‘places associated with pre-1900 human activity, where there may be evidence relating to the history of New Zealand’.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Warden of the Te Aroha Mining District
    HARRY KENRICK: THE FIRST WARDEN OF THE TE AROHA MINING DISTRICT Philip Hart Te Aroha Mining District Working Papers No. 52 Revised on February 16, 2021 Historical Research Unit Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton, New Zealand ISSN: 2463-6266 © 2016 Philip Hart Contact: [email protected] 1 HARRY KENRICK: THE FIRST WARDEN OF THE TE AROHA MINING DISTRICT Abstract: Because of his improvident father, Harry Kenrick left England for the Victorian goldfields before moving to the South Island of New Zealand. In 1865, he settled in the West Coast to begin a lifetime career of working for the government. In addition to his official duties, he was involved in mining and assisted to develop the district, becoming involved in disputes that foreshadowed his experiences at Thames. Appointed as resident magistrate for Poverty Bay in 1877, his work was praised, as it had been on the West Coast, but two years later he was abruptly moved to Thames to become both magistrate and warden after the forced resignation of his predecessor, William Fraser. The latter’s career is examined, as is how his clique hated Kenrick for replacing him; but most residents welcomed a man whose decisions were seen as fair and just. Fraser retained support amongst many in the community, becoming mayor and then a member of parliament, but continued to snipe at Kenrick, supported by a small number of malcontents, who made his life difficult. In his determination to make his subordinates perform their duties satisfactorily, Kenrick provoked conflict with Hugh McIlhone, Inspector of Miners’ Rights, and James Monteith McLaren, Inspector of Mines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Rural Settlement Pattern Of
    THE EVOLUTION OF THE RURAL SETTLEMENT PATTERN OF LOWLAND SOUTH TARAN.AKI 1860 - 1920 BEING A THESIS presented to UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Geography By G.I. RAWSON 1967 CONTENTS Page CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 Aim Sources Method Physical Setting References CHAPTER TWO: THE BEGININGS OF SETTLEMENT 11 (a) The Settlement Pattern 1868-1870 The Need For Security The ITilTllaturity Of Settlement The Pattern Was A Simple One (b) The 1870's - Some Continuing Themes Settlement Characteristics The Position Of The Maori Government Influence Increased Regional Identity References CHAPTER THREE: THE OCCUPATION OF THE BUSHLANDS 25 The Demand For Land Government Assistance The Prog+ess of Settlement References CHAPTER FOUR: SOUTH TARANAKI 1884-1886 33 (a) Where The People Were (b) The Farming Scene The Established Farms1 The Bush Farms First Attempts At Dairying (c) Some Continuing Themes References CHAPTER FIVE: THE GROWTH OF DAIRYING 1886-1920 49 Initial Difficulties Initiative Taken By The Farmers The Role Of The Entrepreneur Progress To 1893 1893-1920 - The Final Developments References CHAPTER SIX: THE PATTERN COMPLETED - SOUTH TA.RA.NAKI 64 In 1920 CHAPTER SEVEN: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 69 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 73 FIGURES: Following Page Fig. 1 SOUTH TARAN.AKI 1868 - 1870 14 Fig. 2 SOUTH TARAN.AKI 1884 - 1886 34 Fig. 3 THE EXPANSION OF DAIRYING - 1888 - 1920 54 Fig. 4 SOUTH TARAN.AKI 1920 65 Fig. 5 TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS In End Pocket J;>LATES: Following Page PLATE ONE: The Waimate Plains 6 PLATE TWO: The Waingongoro Valley 6 PLATE THREE: Undulating Land near Eltham 7 PLATE FOUR: The Hurleyville area 7 PLATE FIVE: The Fringes of The Hill Country 39 PLATE SIX: A Raupo Whare In The 1880 1 s 39 PLATE SEVEN: The Manutahi Area 58 PLATE EIGHT: Kakaramea 58 PLATE NINE: The Fraser Road Dairy Factory 67 PLATE TEN: Unimproved Land Near Eltham 67 Unless otherwise acknowledged all photographs were taken by the author.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Corpse Factory the Master Hoax of British Propaganda in the First World War Joachim Neander
    t.g theologie.geschichte herausgegeben von der Universität des Saarlandes Beiheft 6: The German Corpse Factory The Master Hoax of British Propaganda in the First World War Joachim Neander The German Corpse Factory The Master Hoax of British Propaganda in the First World War universaar Universitätsverlag des Saarlandes Saarland University Press Presses Universitaires de la Sarre © 2013 universaar Universitätsverlag des Saarlandes Saarland University Press Presses Universitaires de la Sarre Postfach 151150, 66041 Saarbrücken ISSN 2191-1592 gedruckte Ausgabe ISSN 2191-4745 Online-Ausgabe ISBN 978-3-86223-117-1 gedruckte Ausgabe ISBN 978-3-86223-118-8 Online-Ausgabe URN urn:nbn:de:bsz:291-universaar-t.g.beihefte.v60 Gestaltung und Satz: Dr. August Leugers-Scherzberg, Julian Wichert Projektbetreuung universaar: Müller, Alt Gedruckt auf säurefreiem Papier von Monsenstein & Vannerdat Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen National bibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.d-nb.de> abrufbar. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 7 I. ATROCITIES, DENIAL, AND ANTI-DENIAL ............. 25 II. THE ROOTS OF THE LEGEND ............................... 43 III. A PROPAGANDA BLITZ: THE “CORPSE FACTORY” CONQUERS THE WORLD ...................................... 131 IV. “KEEP THE HOME FIRES BURNING” .................... 179 V. THE “CORPSE FACTORY” GOES GLOBAL
    [Show full text]
  • The Public and Political Life of Wiremu Te Kakakura Parata 1871-1906
    Wai 2200, #A216 The Public and Political Life of Wiremu Te Kakakura Parata 1871-1906 Tony Walzl Walghan Partners 10 May 2019 1 Contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 6 PARATA AS PARLIAMENTARIAN .......................................................................... 8 The 1871 Parliamentary Session.......................................................................... 10 Confiscation .............................................................................................................. 11 Maori Representation .............................................................................................. 13 Other Issues .............................................................................................................. 20 The 1872 Parliamentary Session.......................................................................... 23 Hui at Otaki and Parihaka ........................................................................................ 24 Maori Representation .............................................................................................. 25 Land Confiscation ..................................................................................................... 27 The Fall of the Fox Ministry...................................................................................... 31 The Rise and Fall of the Stafford Ministry ............................................................... 36 Parata’s Appointment to
    [Show full text]
  • The White Horse Press Full Citation: Knight, Catherine. "The Paradox of Discourse Concerning Deforestation in New Zealand
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Knight, Catherine. "The Paradox of Discourse Concerning Deforestation in New Zealand: A Historical Survey." Environment and History 15, no. 3 (August 2009): 323–42. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3383. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2009. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. The Paradox of Discourse Concerning Deforestation in New Zealand: A Historical Survey CATHERINE KNIGHT 32 Bluewater Place Paraparaumu Kapiti Coast, New Zealand Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT When the European settlement of New Zealand began in earnest in the mid- nineteenth century, the landscape too underwent a dramatic transformation. Much of the forest was destroyed by milling and fire, and the land converted to pasture for farming. While seen by many as firmly within the prevailing ‘doc- trine of progress’, this transformation was viewed with misgivings by others, who observed how deforestation led to erosion and floods, and advocated more prudent forest management. This paper explores the historical discourse on deforestation around the latter part of the nineteenth and early part of the twentieth centuries and how it contrasts with the recent discourse following major floods in 2004, in which the discussion of deforestation as an underlying cause of floods and erosion is notable in its very absence.
    [Show full text]
  • James Macandrew of Otago Slippery Jim Or a Leader Staunch and True?
    JAMES MACANDREW OF OTAGO SLIPPERY JIM OR A LEADER STAUNCH AND TRUE? BY RODERICK JOHN BUNCE A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2013 iii ABSTRACT James Macandrew, a Scotsman who migrated to Dunedin in 1851, was variously a businessman, twice Superintendent of Otago Province, an imprisoned bankrupt and a Minister of the Crown. He was an active participant in provincial and colonial politics for 36 years and was associated with most of the major political events in New Zealand during that time. Macandrew was a passionate and persuasive advocate for the speedy development of New Zealand’s infrastructure to stimulate the expansion of settlement. He initiated a steamer service between New Zealand and Australia in 1858 but was bankrupt by 1860. While Superintendent of Otago in 1860 and 1867–76 he was able to advance major harbour, transport and educational projects. As Minister of Public Works in George Grey’s Ministry from 1878–79 he promoted an extensive expansion of the country’s railway system. In Parliament, he was a staunch advocate of easier access to land for all settlers, and a promoter of liberal social legislation which was enacted a decade later by the Seddon Government. His life was interwoven with three influential settlers, Edward Gibbon Wakefield, Julius Vogel and George Grey, who variously dominated the political landscape. Macandrew has been portrayed as an opportunist who exploited these relationships, but this study will demonstrate that while he often served these men as a subordinate, as a mentor he influenced their political beliefs and behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymn of Hate”
    Wicked Wilhelmites and Sauer Krauts: The New Zealand Reception of Ernst Lissauer’s “Hymn of Hate” ROGER SMITH Abstract When the German poet Ernst Lissauer published his anti-English poem “Haßgesang gegen England” in the early weeks of the First World War, the effect was electric. The poem, translated into English and dubbed the “Hymn of Hate,” echoed around the globe, reaching as far as New Zealand where newspapers sedulously followed its international reception and published local responses. Given the nature of New Zealand’s relationship to Britain and the strength of the international press links, it is not surprising that news of the poem reached New Zealand in the early months of the war. However, the sheer volume of coverage given to a single German war poem in New Zealand’s press over the course of the war and after, as well as the many and varied responses to that poem by New Zealanders both at home and serving overseas, are surprising. This article examines the broad range of responses to Lissauer’s now forgotten poem by New Zealanders during the Great War and after, from newspaper reports, editorials and cartoons, to poetic parodies, parliamentary speeches, enterprising musical performances and publications, and even seasonal greeting cards. “The poem fell like a shell into a munitions depot.” With these words, the Austrian novelist Stefan Zweig recalled the impact made by Ernst Lissauer’s anglophobic poem “Haßgesang gegen England” (“A Chant of Hate Against England”) upon first publication in Germany in 1914.1 The reception of Lissauer’s poem in the German-speaking world is a remarkable story, but its reception, in translation, in the English-speaking world is no less surprising.
    [Show full text]
  • GNS Science Report 2013/45
    BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Scott, B.J. 2013. A revised catalogue of Ruapehu volcano eruptive activity: 1830-2012, GNS Science Report 2013/45. 113 p. B.J. Scott, GNS Science, Private Bag 2000, Taupo 3352 © Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2013 ISSN 1177-2425 ISBN 978-1-972192-92-4 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... IV KEYWORDS ........................................................................................................................ IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 DATASETS ................................................................................................................ 2 3.0 CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIVITY ............................................................................... 3 4.0 DATA SET COMPLETNESS ...................................................................................... 5 5.0 ERUPTION NARRATIVE ............................................................................................ 6 6.0 LAHARS ................................................................................................................... 20 7.0 DISCUSSION............................................................................................................ 22 8.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 28 TABLES Table
    [Show full text]
  • 'Thinking from a Place Called London': the Metropolis and Colonial
    ‘Thinking from a place called London’: The Metropolis and Colonial Culture, 1837-1907 FELICITY BARNES In April 1907, at the Colonial Conference in London, the premiers of the white self-governing colonies met with members of the imperial government to reconcile two apparently conflicting objectives: to gain greater acknowledgement of their de facto political autonomy, and commitment to strengthening imperial unity.1 The outcomes of this conference tend to be cast in constitutional and political terms, but this process also renegotiated the cultural boundaries of empire. The white settler colonies sought to clarify their position within the empire, by, on the one hand, asserting equal status with Britain, and, on the other, emphasizing the distinction between themselves and the dependent colonies.2 In doing so they invoked and reinforced a hierarchical version of empire. This hierarchy, underpinned by ideas of separation and similarity, would be expressed vividly in the conference’s outcomes, first in the rejection of the term ‘colonial’ as a name for future conferences. These were redesignated, inaccurately, as ‘imperial’, not ‘colonial’, elevating their status as it narrowed their participation.3 ‘Imperial’ might be metropolitan, but ‘colonial’ was always peripheral. Whilst the first Colonial Conference, held in 1887, had included Crown colonies along with the self-governing kinds,4 20 years later the former were no longer invited, and India, or, more precisely, the India Office and its officials, was only a marginal presence.5 As wider participation declined, imperial government involvement increased. From 1907 the conference was to be chaired by the British prime minister. This pattern was repeated in changes to the Colonial Office itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Applications for Land Made to the Lands & Survey Office
    Pandora Research www.nzpictures.co.nz Register of Applications for land made to the Lands & Survey Office Wellington Archives NZ Reference ADXS 19505 LSW-16/4 Applications 4524 to 6138 No. Name Date # acres 4524 Patrick Byrne 06 Dec 1873 44 4525 Edward Nolloth Liffiton 08 Dec 1873 1 rood 4526 Farquhar Gray 09 Dec 1873 107a 1r 4527 Edwin Meredith 15 Dec 1873 238 4528 Robert Milson 15 Dec 1873 173a 1r 4529 Thomas Parkins 15 Dec 1873 173a 1r 4530 John Milson 15 Dec 1873 173a 1r 4531 Francis Stevens 24 Dec 1873 20 4532 Edwin Meredith 02 Jan 1874 80 4533 Thomas Kethen York 02 Jan 1874 50a 1r 4534 John Chew 02 Jan 1874 640 4535 Edwin Feist 03 Jan 1874 60 4536 Gustav Horatio Johann Kummer 05 Jan 1874 640 4537 John Alfred Perry 07 Jan 1874 60 4538 James Cooper 08 Jan 1874 195 4539 Charles Ferdinand Rutherfurd 12 Jan 1874 60 4540 George Cornelius Rees & John Lester 12 Jan 1874 120 4541 Ewen Grant 13 Jan 1874 60 4542 William McDouall 14 Jan 1874 50 4543 Thomas Kebbell and John Kebbell 15 Jan 1874 17a 2r 24p 4544 James Buick 15 Jan 1874 50 4545 William Brewer and George Brewer 19 Jan 1874 1a 1r 3p 4546 William Wratten 21 Jan 1874 120 4547 Thomas William Pilcher 23 Jan 1874 20 4548 William Wratten 27 Jan 1874 120 4549 Henry Benjamin Ellerm 29 Jan 1874 76 4550 John Sutherland 30 Jan 1874 640 4551 Stephen John Parslow Alpass 04 Feb 1874 50 4552 Peter Lockhart Sim, John Fernie, James John Wright and William Norwood 04 Feb 1874 1 rood 4553 Joseph Oates and Richard Bright 05 Feb 1874 100 4554 John Johnston 05 Feb 1874 2803 4555 Donald McLean 05 Feb 1874
    [Show full text]
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part
    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part One ISBN 0 902 198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART I A-J C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.
    [Show full text]