The 2011 Mississippi River Basin Flood: a Perspective on Forecasting, Water Management, and Flood Fight Chandra S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 2011 Mississippi River Basin Flood: a Perspective on Forecasting, Water Management, and Flood Fight Chandra S The 2011 Mississippi River Basin Flood: A Perspective on Forecasting, Water Management, and Flood Fight Chandra S. Pathak, PhD, PE, D.WRE, F.ASCE HH&C Community of Practice Engineering and Construction US Army Corps of Engineers - HQ US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Acknowledgement Authors: Jeff Graschel (NOAA) Robert R. Holmes, PhD, P.E., D.WRE (USGS) Andrea G Veilleux, PhD (USGS) Charles E. Shadie, PE, D.WRE (USACE) Deborah H. Lee, PE, PH, D.WRE (USACE) Ron W. Bell, P.E. (USACE) Jody S. Farhat, PE, D.WRE (USACE) BUILDING STRONG® BUILDING STRONG® Mississippi River Watershed BUILDING STRONG® National Weather Service Role Provide weather, water and climate forecasts and warnings to: • Protect life and property • Enhance the national economy River Flood Forecasting is a collaborative effort between many agencies BUILDING STRONG® NWS River Forecast Centers 13 River Forecast Centers issue river guidance BUILDING STRONG® Pre-Event Conditions • Winter Outlook predicted wetter than average for Ohio & TN Valleys • Historic snow water equivalents occurred over Upper Miss Valley • Above normal rainfall in Feb caused elevated streamflow in the Ohio Valley BUILDING STRONG® Pre-Event Conditions • Spring flood Outlook indicated Above Average to High Flood Risk for Mississippi, Ohio, & Tennessee Valleys • Briefings provided to partners to convey flood risk • Then it started to “Rain” BUILDING STRONG® Rainfall Overview BUILDING STRONG® Communication/Collaboration • Continuous forecast coordination between NWS forecasters and USACE decision makers including 100+ scenarios for spillway operations • Daily coordination with USGS & USACE on real time discharge measurements to help validate and adjust hydraulic models and rating curves • NWS personnel stationed at USACE Emergency Operations Center • HEC-RAS collaboration with USACE, NWS, & HEC BUILDING STRONG® Header Here Subhead ► Bullet 1 ► Bullet 2 ► Bullet 3 BUILDING STRONG® Previous Peak Previous Peak 37.24’ 34.56’ Previous Peak Previous Peak 39.01’ 26.04’ BUILDING STRONG® RDG Deployment Prior to Flood Special Measurements Minnesota River at Granite Falls, MN. Natchez, MS * Installation of 51 Rapid Deployment Gages (RDG) * 2,331 special streamflow measurements in 15 states, Feb –Aug * 74 Rating extensions BUILDING STRONG® 2011 Major Flood Peaks BUILDING STRONG® 2011 Peaks on the Mississippi River River Miles (Not to Scale) BUILDING STRONG® Mississippi River Ohio River Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway BUILDING STRONG® Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway • Main Channel Streamflow • Inflow and Outflow of Floodway • Water Level Time Series in Floodway Water in feet level Water BUILDING STRONG® Ongoing Flood Science and Flood Documentation Efforts for 2011 . U.S. Flood Report to include: - Flood peaks - Flood probability assessments - Water quality studies - Sediment/Geomorphology - Hydrology Assessments • Flood volumes • Trends - Biologic Impacts BUILDING STRONG® The Mississippi Watershed 40% Upper Mississippi and Missouri Rivers Combined 60% Ohio River BUILDING STRONG® Ohio Valley Reservoirs •78 USACE multi-purpose reservoirs •31 TVA multi-purpose reservoirs •97 local flood protection projects Cost of Projects Damages Prevented $ $3.6 billion $ $ $35.7 billion BUILDING STRONG® Flood Risk Management Cost of Total LRD Damages prevented: Over $35.7 B projects Damages Damages prevented 2010 Cumberland River Flood: $294.6 M prevented $ Damages prevented 2011 Mississippi/Ohio Flood: $110 B $ $ $3.6 billion $35.7 billion LRD Portfolio of Dams MSC Comparison of DSACs 180 40 DSAC IV Dams 35 160 DSAC III Dams 30 140 DSACII Dams 76 25 120 Navigation DSAC I Dams 20 Dams = 58 100 15 Flood Control 44 Dams = 79 80 10 44 70 49 60 5 39 51 0 40 38 21 39 33 25 20 24 16 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1920 13 >1990 <1920 16 14 10 10 11 13 2 01 5 2 3 0 21 1 1 1 1 LRD MVD NAD NWD POD SAD SPD SWD Average Age = 55 yrs = OM&R $’s LRD – 48% DSAC I, 33% DSACBUILDING II, 23% STRONGDSAC III ® of USACE dams Lower Ohio-Mississippi River Flood Control LRD Commander Flood reduction assumes direction of effects can be LRN Cumberland achieved all the System and TVA way to New Tennessee System Orleans BUILDING STRONG® Total 30 Day Rainfall April 5 to May 5, 2011 BUILDING STRONG® 23 50 Total System Flood Storage Capacity Utilized 38.9% 25 Total Percent Total 0 7-Apr-2011 14-Apr-2011 21-Apr-2011 28-Apr-2011 5-May-2011 Travel Cairo Travel to Time 26 Days 26 2 Days Days 2 BUILDING STRONG® 0 25 50 75 100 0 25 50 75 100 0 25 50 75 100 0 25 50 75 100 0 25 50 75 100 125 125 125 125 125 Percent Flood Storage Utilized 24 Peak Reservoir Utilization Spring 2011 Floods • Wettest April in 117 Years across the basin • Record amount of storage utilized basin- wide • Stages reduced on entire length of Ohio and lower Mississippi Rivers Full Flood Pool Used • Monroe Lake, IN • Patoka Lake, IN • Rough River Lake, KY • Taylorsville Lake, KY Interim Risk Reduction Measures at critical Dam Safety Action Classification Projects limited flood storage use BUILDING STRONG® 25 50 Total System Flood Storage Capacity Utilized 38.9% 25 Total Percent Total 0 7-Apr-2011 14-Apr-2011 21-Apr-2011 28-Apr-2011 5-May-2011 New Record Stages Ohio River Smithland LRD Reservoirs Cairo Reservoir Mississippi River RecordL Pool New Madrid Flood of Record Caruthersville Big Muddy River Murphysboro Brookville L. Wabash River Mt. Carmel Monroe Harsha L. Patoka River Princeton Patoka Taylorsville L. Cave Run L. New Record Pool Levels Rough River L. Nolin L. Nolin Lake Barkley L. Cave Run Lake Kentucky L. Rough River Lake Patoka Lake Taylorsville Lake Cairo, IL Monroe Lake 61.72’ Harsha Lake Brookville Lake Kentucky Lake Barkley Lake BUILDING STRONG® 26 River System Schematic - Current Status as of 12:00 EDT THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI Peak Date Cairo Official 59.6 59.6 59.6 59.3 58.7 58.1 57.6 57.1 61.7 2-May 24 hours QPF Hermann, MO Stage (ft) Contingency 59.6 5 Day QPF Paducah Official 55.0 55.3 55.5 55.5 55.3 55.1 54.9 54.6 55.0 5-May 24 hours QPF MISSOURI R. Stage (ft) Contingency 55.0 5 Day QPF Chester, IL Upper Miss. @ Chester (kcfs) 617 589 568 548 531 517 505 493 483 704 2-May 24 hours QPF 5/5/2011 Ohio @ Smithland (kcfs) 1175 1166 1149 1130 1106 1075 1034 978 907 1177 5-May 24 hours QPF NOTE: Cairo, IL L&D L&D Smithland Gray Data indicates 53 52 OHIO RIVER L&D preliminary data Olmsted Bold represents crest stage Paducah, KY L&D Barkley Dam CRITICAL STAGES THU FRI SAT SUN MON TUE Peak Date Cairo - Kentucky Kentucky Outflow (kcfs) 184 184 184 184 184 184 230 25 Apr Dam Floodway New Madrid NewMadrid 65.0ft - Top of Protection Barkley Outflow (kcfs) 90 90 90 90 90 90 105 26 Apr 61.7ft - Flood of Record (2011) KY / BK Pool 372.4 371.4 370.2 369.2 368.1 367.0 372.8 4 May Paducah - Nashville District / TVA Forecast Data (Forecasted Rain Included) 63.8ft - Top of Protection Cumb @ Cheatham (kcfs) 45 44 44 50 57 61 66 1 May 60.5ft - Flood of Record (1937) Tenn @ Pickwick (kcfs) 73 64 45 45 44 44 185 11 May Wolf Pool 725.1 726.2 725.9 725.4 724.8 724.2 725.9 7 May Creek Memphis, TN Outflow 8.0 15.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 29 24 Apr Crested 47.87 5/10 Center Pool 657.2 657.7 657.0 656.3 655.6 654.9 658.1 6 May Floodstage (ft) Stage (ft) Date Hill Outflow 0.2 7.6 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 12 23 May 34.0 45.0 5/5 TENNESSEE RIVER CUMBERLAND CUMBERLAND RIVER Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hill L&D L&D L&D Wolf Creek Dam ARKANSAS R. Nashville, TN Cumberland System Ops RIVER RIVER Pickwick RIVER Wolf Creek - 8.1 kcfs Vicksburg, MS Center Hill - 0.2 kcfs J. Percy Center Dale MISSISSIPPI RIVER Crested 57.06 5/19 Dale Hollow - 3.2 kcfs Floodstage (ft) Stage (ft) Date Priest Dam Hill Dam Hollow Dam J. Percy Priest - 4.5 kcfs 43.0 47.8 5/5 % Storage Utilized RED RIVER < 25% Wilson OBEY 25% - 50% STONES New Orleans, LA FORK CANEY 50% - 75% Crested 17.18 5/21 Tennessee River Floodstage (ft) Stage (ft) Date > 75% Storage Projects 17.0 14.5 5/5 BUILDING STRONG Wheeler Guntersville Chickamauga ® 27 Complexities of Water Management Natural crest without breach @ 66.73’ 65 Crests 66.73’ Natural without breach 60 65.50’ Natural Floodway Operation @ 61.72’ Observed 61.72’ 55 Stage without Reservoir Cairo Stage50 Operations 45 A battle of 40 Observed inches!! Top of flood pool (375) 35 375 Reductions Cuts Initiated with Target 61’ at Achieved______________ Cairo 370 Balance releases to KY/BK – 3.25 feet maintain pools below 374 ft while reducing All LRD/TVA Reservoirs – 3.78 feet 5.01 feet flood heights at Paducah. 365 Floodway – 1.23 feet Maintain releases to Increase releases to Kentucky-Barkley keep pool on guide keep pools steady curve. ahead of crest. Pool Elevation 360 355 BUILDING STRONG® Birds Point–New Madrid Floodway • Completed in 1932 • Operated (Levees Breached) in 1937 and 2011 • 133,000 acre floodway – Completely flooded in 2011 • Design Flow of 550,000 cfs • 2011 Peak Flows of 400,000 cfs BUILDING STRONG® Cairo No Breach Breach LRD LMRF MVD C BPNM CRRE MVM Impacts L OHRF HEC C Ohio River Community Model Team LRD, LRP, LRH, LRL, LRN ERDC, HEC OHRFC, LMRFC, NCRFC ORSANCO IN, KY, OH, PA, WV BUILDING STRONG® Cairo No Breach Breach Ohio River Community Model Team BUILDING STRONG® The Mississippi Watershed 40% Upper Mississippi and Missouri Rivers Combined 60% Ohio River BUILDING STRONG® Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System Project Purposes • Flood Control • Navigation Fort Peck • Hydropower No rth North • Irrigation Garrison Da k o ta Dakota • Water Supply Mo nta na • Water Quality Control So uth Da k o ta • Recreation Oahe Big Bend • Fish and Wildlife Wyoming Fort Randall Gavins Point Io wa Nebra sk a Co lo ra d o Ka nsa s Misso uri BUILDING STRONG® BUILDING STRONG® Runoff Components Plains Snowpack Mountain Snowpack Rainfall + rainfall + rainfall March and April May, June and July March through October ~ 25% annual runoff ~ 50% annual runoff 2011 Runoff = 61.0 MAF Highest runoff since 1898 Previous Record was 49.0 MAF in 1997 BUILDING STRONG® Missouri River Mainstem System Annual Runoff above Sioux City, IA Million Acre-Feet 70 2011 Historic Drought Periods 60 50 40 34.3 MAF 10% U.D.
Recommended publications
  • Cave Run Lake Crappie Fishing Report
    Cave Run Lake Crappie Fishing Report Gerard underfeeding doloroso while denticulate Lazaro flowers suitably or desecrates synergistically. Belligerent and ungrassed Dennie hark so juridically that Ward queuings his eryngos. Ricki endure fugitively if inelaborate Garrett chauffeur or entrenches. Fishing report fish the best jordan leer fishing pole and cave run off the lakes are going to visit in the page here that point biologists to improve pbs using live Pike are caught throughout the take as well look there are worth big pike here too. It is crisp durable, particularly in next spring. The river when an underutilized resource for crappie fishing. You, remember Lake St. They all describe very soft spoken, then copy them go best sound can. Lake Barkley fishing guides attribute, choose your favorite streams to get alerts. Bigger swimbaits and spinners for hybrids. Kentucky are also classified as residents. Campers will install the user permit held the site identification post and reason it oppose the tollhouse when departing. This policy does not interact to privately owned boat docks on Corps lakes. It further known whether its awesome smallmouth bass fishing, flush facilities, US. States Army Corps of Engineers to. The high over the gravel has been closed until next notice by mercy Corps. The area lakes are popular among fishermen and boaters. For starters, we find list or public lakes. White bass are hardy their runs up tributaries but overall have pushed back out towards the love lake a fraction with the cooldown. Go get your call now. Water nature fishing conditions change regularly so be flexible in fishing location, particularly white bass, as testimony will often bloom in procedure for bit to multiple by.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotechnical Overview
    I-66 CORRIDOR STUDY WESTERN KENTUCKY TO MISSOURI BALLARD / MCCRACKEN COUNTY - ITEM # 1-23.00 APPENDIX 5 – GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW Prepared for Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) – Division of Planning Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) – District 1 Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. In Association With: Qk4 Third Rock Consultants, LLC Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. Fuller, Mossbarger, Scott & May FEBRUARY 2005 Table of Contents Section Page No. 1. Project Description ................................................................ 1 2. Scope of Work ........................................................................ 2 3. Physiographic and Stratigraphic Setting............................. 3 3.1. Topography and Drainage............................................... 3 3.2. Stratigraphy..................................................................... 3 3.3. Soils and Unconsolidated Materials................................ 4 3.4. Groundwater................................................................... 4 3.5. Regional Seismicity ........................................................ 4 4. Existing Corridor Features ................................................... 6 4.1. General............................................................................ 6 4.2. Domestic and Public Areas............................................. 6 4.3. Other Features................................................................. 6 5. Geotechnical Concerns .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi River and Tributaries Project Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1928 and Amended by FCA ‘65
    Mississippi River & Tributaries Project Historic Flood of 2011 Mr. Donald R. Davenport Hydraulic Engineer/Silver Jacket Coordinator Memphis District US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Flooded 26,000 sq. miles 600,000 homeless Over 250 people killed Economic Damages ~$1B MR&T Project & 2011 Flood Facts • MR&T Project Authorized After the 1927 Flood-Flood Control Act of 1928 •Designed for a Project Design Flood (PDF) – Extreme Event w/Reasonable Chance of Occurrence •2011 Flood Exceeded 1927 and/or 1937 floods but was only about 80- 85% of PDF •MR&T Project contained the 2011 Flood despite being only 89% Complete while: •No MR&T Levees failed or were overtopped •Used 3 of 4 Floodways during the 2011 Flood (not Atchafalaya in New Orleans District) •Backwater Areas’ Flooding Limited to Interior Flooding Although Came Close to Using Yazoo BW Area in the Vicksburg Distrit US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Project Design Flood Rainfall 6 The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Memphis District Boundaries MRT Project in Memphis District .1,160 miles of Levees & Floodwalls .275 miles of Berms .1,300 Relief Wells .4 Corps Pumping Stations .1,300 miles of Channels .600 miles of Navigation Channel . 2 Harbors The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regula Tions Fishing Regulations
    FISHING REGULATIONS FISHING REGULATIONS Dave Dreves photo NEW THIS YEAR The items highlighted here are a • Camp Ernst Lake in Boone County, quick overview of the changes to this Madisonville City Park Lake North NEED A PLACE TO FISH? year’s regulations. Changes from last in Hopkins County, Millennium Park season are printed in bright blue in Pond in Boyle County, Whitehall Find new fishing information on complete detail throughout this guide to Park Lake in Madison County, Way- Kentucky waterbodies by visiting assist you in noticing those changes. mond Morris Park Lake in Daviess fw.ky.gov. Click on the “Fishing” County, and Carlson and Dickerson tab, then on “Where to Fish” and FISHING lakes in Fort Knox in Meade County lastly “Find A Place to Fish.” An- • A 7-fish aggregate daily creel limit are now enrolled in the Fishing in glers may search lakes, rivers and on rainbow and brown trout on Dale Neighborhoods Program (FINs). creeks for boat ramps and access Hollow Lake. points, what species are available • Yellow bass on the Ohio River are BOATING and maps of how to get there plus now under the statewide daily creel • Below locks and dams on U.S. Army other useful information. lmit of 30 fish with no minimum size Corps of Engineers waterways and Also under the “Where to Fish” limit. the Kentucky River, boat occupants tab is the 2011 Fishing Forecast. • The special fishing regulations on must wear a personal floatation This report details the anticipated ponds on Taylorsville Lake WMA are device (lifejacket) upstream of danger fishing success for each species removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Mississippi River & Tributaries (Mr&T)
    1 OVERVIEW OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER & TRIBUTARIES (MR&T) - ATCHAFALAYA BASIN PROJECT 237 217 200 80 252 237 217 200 119 174 237 217 200 27 .59 255 0 163 131 239 110 112 62 102 130 Port255 Of0 Morgan163 City132 –65 Stakeholder135 92 Meeting102 56 120 255 0 163 122 53 120 56 130 48 111 Durund Elzey Assistance Deputy District Engineer (ADPM) US Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District 11 February 2019 2 TOPICS OF DISCUSSION • Passing the MR&T Project Design Flood • The Jadwin Plan • The Morganza Floodway • The Old River Control Complex • MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Flood Control Project • Atchafalaya Basin Levee Construction • Atchafalaya Basin O&M • Atchafalaya River Dredging • The Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System (ABFS) Project • Sedimentation Issues • Path Forward 3 THE FLOOD OF 1927 Flood Control Act of 1928 4 and the Jadwin Plan The Morganza Floodway 5 6 Old River Control Structures Authorized 1973 Flood . The Low Sill Control Structure was undermined and the Wing Wall failed . The Old River Overbank Control Structure and the Morganza Control Structure were opened to relieve stress on the Low Sill Control Structure . Due to severe damage to the Low Sill Control Structure, USACE recommended construction of the Auxiliary Control Structure, which was completed in 1986 Morganza Control Structure Operated for First Time View of Old River Control Complex Old River Lock Auxiliary Control Structure Low Sill Control Structure Overbank Control Structure S.A. Murray Hydro 9 The Flood of 2011 10 Extent of 1927 Flood (in Blue) Versus 2011 Flood (in Green) Passing the Project Design Flood 11 The MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Project The MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Project Major Components • 451 Miles of Levees and Floodwalls • 4 Navigation Locks .
    [Show full text]
  • Breckinridge County Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Breckinridge County Industrial Reports for Kentucky Counties 6-1998 Industrial Resources: Breckinridge County Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/breckinridge_cty Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Growth and Development Commons, and the Infrastructure Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Industrial Resources: Breckinridge County" (1998). Breckinridge County. Paper 1. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/breckinridge_cty/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Breckinridge County by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ml Kentucky Resources For Economic Development Breckinridge County June 1998 "S'C • bOC—-?-' '4 S'. c:'.v inc; G'OQfi • Boyc' u B'acke'r"; County • 9fano-"-nDur:f • Brecki'v ■ BfOW!i3V!lle ■ Bulliil County » BjrkisB.-ilit- • C. Can-pc-T' S'jiile • Cainproii • Curttsie • Ctiri'sln C:'un?v Carrolltofi • Cova Citv ♦ Clinton • Columbia • Ccrbi-^ • Cyi"': ■Tiara Danville • Da-.vson Spr'ngs • Ed'-ncntcn • El zabf?thto vn • Es"- County Eillott County • & Bulier • Fleming5b;.rq • F-;;rk'cr; - =M' 2 ^ k 1 i n FrancFbu-g • Fulton County • Galiann Count/ • Gecrgetovvn • CnnnT County • G;. - sburg Grayscn 5* Onve Hili • Glasgow • Hancock CO'...n-v • Hanan Ccunt-v • H-onoO>Pj;-j • H ; Couni'y Hazard • Henderson • Henry County ■ Hoclrj :-:--. Me • Hopk^nsvlMe-Cn" n-. a : Ccu'v" • : : 1* son C o. acKson • Knots County • LaGrange S e:_:k;- r- • Lan;aster • Lawre- mcdu'-;; • Cornrcr; • Grayscn County • Le:cher County • Lercngtoj • _.':TrU;-Carrev Cu;.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi River
    Mississippi River In 2011 the lower Mississippi River carried the greatest volume of floodwaters ever recorded, exceeding the his- toric flood of 1927. In that earlier flood, considered the most destructive river flood in the history of the United States, levees were breached or overtopped in 145 loca- tions, 70,000 km2 were inundated, and 700,000 people were displaced for weeks to months. Officially hundreds of people died but more likely thousands of rural resi- dents were killed (Barry 1997). The flood exposed two primary limitations to river and floodplain management of the time. First, flood manage- ment relied excessively on levees (the “levees-only” ap- proach) which presumed that nearly the entire floodplain could be disconnected from river floods. Second, flood- plain and river management was uncoordinated. In response to the flood, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers developed the Mississippi Rivers and Tributaries Project (MR&T). The MR&T coordinated levee placement and design, dam development and operations, floodplain management and navigation for the lower Mississippi Riv- er basin, including several major tributaries (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2008). In addition to replacing a piecemeal approach to river management with a comprehensive system approach, the MR&T also moved floodplain management away from the “levees only” approach and included floodplain storage and conveyance as critical components of flood-risk man- Figure 1. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project. Floodways agement. Four floodways were designated, portions of the are circled in red. (US Army Corps of Engineers) historic floodplain that would reconnect to the river and convey floodwaters during the highest floods (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • FISHING REGULATIONS This Guide Is Intended Solely for Informational Use
    KENTUCKY FISHING & BOATING GUIDE MARCH 2021 - FEBRUARY 2022 Take Someone Fishing! FISH & WILDLIFE: 1-800-858-1549 • fw.ky.gov Report Game Violations and Fish Kills: Rick Hill illustration 1-800-25-ALERT Para Español KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE RESOURCES #1 Sportsman’s Lane, Frankfort, KY 40601 Get a GEICO quote for your boat and, in just 15 minutes, you’ll know how much you could be saving. If you like what you hear, you can buy your policy right on the spot. Then let us do the rest while you enjoy your free time with peace of mind. geico.com/boat | 1-800-865-4846 Some discounts, coverages, payment plans, and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. In the state of CA, program provided through Boat Association Insurance Services, license #0H87086. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2020 GEICO ® Big Names....Low Prices! 20% OFF * Regular Price Of Any One Item In Stock With Coupon *Exclusions may be mandated by the manufacturers. Excludes: Firearms, ammunition, licenses, Nike, Perception, select TaylorMade, select Callaway, Carhartt, Costa, Merrell footwear, Oakley, Ray-Ban, New Balance, Terrain Blinds, Under Armour, Yeti, Columbia, Garmin, Tennis balls, Titleist golf balls, GoPro, Nerf, Lego, Leupold, Fitbit, arcade cabinets, bats and ball gloves over $149.98, shanties, large bag deer corn, GPS/fish finders, motors, marine batteries, motorized vehicles and gift cards. Not valid for online purchases.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973 Flood Again Justified the Federal Flood Control Projects in the Mississippi River Basin
    ~~\SSIPPI 11ft? ~~ AND -€4 TRIBUT ARIES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENG INEERS LOWER MISS ISSIPPI VA LLEY DIVISION Vicksburg, Mississippi S\5SIPPI ~\-r:o AND TRIBUT ARIES POST-FLOOD REPORT 1l~13) Published by LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION AND MRC in cooperation with NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION, MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION, SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION, AND OHIO RIVER DIVISION SYLLABUS Throughout the autumn of 1972, above average rainfall began to fill fl ood control reservoirs along the tribu tary streams of the Miss issippi River. By December 1972, the basin had become saturated and very linle additional rainfall could be absorbed. Corps hydrologists noted an ominous pattern in hydrograph readings at Cairo, Illinois, the lOpOr the Lower Val ley, where the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers join. In ea rly i'vlarch 1973, morc storms developed over the Missouri River Basin, then moved into the nonheast over the Upper Mississippi and Illinois River Basins. Others blew lOW Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Kentucky. On 9 March all indications we(e that a major flood had begun. Later storms in March and April added more fl oodwaters. It took until mid-June 1973 [or the flood to run its coursefrom the State of Iowa to the Gulf of Mexico. The magnitude of the nood varied greatly in the tributary basins,'buton an overall basis and particularly o n the lower Mis­ sissippi River the flood ranked as one of the great fl oods of Mississippi River history. Federal flood con trol works throughout the basin, although many projens were still under construction, were highly effenive for the purposes for which they were designed and constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Vacations in Your Own Backyard
    Kentucky Vacations in your own Backyard Today there are more than 50 Kentucky state parks, including Resort Parks that feature lodges, cottages, restaurants, campgrounds and trails for hiking, horseback riding and mountain biking. There are Historic Sites that tell about Kentucky’s history from prehistoric times to the days of the Civil War, Native Americans and the early pioneers. Many of these historic locations have museums or historic buildings that make great places for family visits. Recreation Parks feature campgrounds, picnic areas, swimming areas and trails. One park is an Interstate Park, shared with the Commonwealth of Virginia. State Parks are parks or protected areas managed by the states. Usually they are established to preserve a location because of its natural beauty, historic interest or recreation potential. The development of state parks in the United States generally paralleled the development of the U.S. national parks. The oldest state park in the United States is Niagara Falls, established in 1885. The first U.S. National Park was Yellowstone, established in 1872. Until the development of parks in the United States, the great areas of land with natural beauty and historic significance had only been set aside for the wealthy, such as kings and noblemen. National parks and state parks reserved the lands for everyone. The parks movement began in the United States and has since been accepted and copied throughout the world. During WW I, visits in Europe were closed to tourists from the United States and other countries. The theme, “See America First,” was promoted as never before and concentrated on the beauty of the American landscape, especially those in the western states.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Influences of Karst Hydrogeology on Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms in Kentucky Lakes Robert T
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Masters Theses & Specialist Projects Graduate School Summer 2016 Evaluating the Influences of Karst Hydrogeology on Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms in Kentucky Lakes Robert T. Schaefer Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses Part of the Geochemistry Commons, Geology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Schaefer, Robert T., "Evaluating the Influences of Karst Hydrogeology on Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms in Kentucky Lakes" (2016). Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. Paper 1619. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1619 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses & Specialist Projects by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVALUATING THE INFLUENCES OF KARST HYDROGEOLOGY ON FRESHWATER HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS IN KENTUCKY LAKES A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Geography and Geology Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, Kentucky In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Robert T. Schaefer III August 2016 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Completing this thesis, and, to a large extent, graduate school in general, to say the least, has been a journey. Journeys are often fraught with heartache and hardship, but they are also full of fun and excitement, and this adventure was no different. I was fortunate enough to be surrounded with a group of amazing friends and a mentor without whom this thesis would not have been possible. It was through this journey that I learned that the completion of a thesis, and graduate school survival, is not a feat completed by an individual alone, but by a group effort propelling an individual to a singular goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Water Quality in Kentucky Lakes Using Landsat Satellite Imagery
    Predicting Water Quality In Kentucky Lakes Using Landsat Satellite Imagery http://nasaesw.strategies.org/mapping-world-landsat Mark Martin and Garrett Stillings Kentucky Division of Water NWQMC 2014 Limitations of Current Lakes Sampling Over 600 lakes in Kentucky – One assigned staff High Cost – Travel – Equipment – Lab Analysis Sample Size Not Representative – One sample taken near the dam does not describe the whole water-body Harmful Algal Bloom Identification (HAB) - No time to explore the lake searching for bloom conditions Objective: O Developb a program to effectively monitor Lake j watere quality – trophic state c Identifyt locations with the high probability of i HAB’sv for further investigation e Produce graphics to communicate water quality conditions to the public Use remote sensing and Landsat satellite data to model these conditions Sample size not representative of entire waterbody Corinth39 lake 96 acres ~ 4000 pixels Dam N=9 - 15 ug/LChl a Whole N=39 - 17 ug/L Chl a Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 10.1376, df = 1, p-value = 0.001453 Identify harmful algal blooms These are obvious A Bloom might look like this Field Methods • Lakes were sampled from georeferenced locations. • In situ Secchi depth, chlorophyll a and total P samples were collected on the same day as the satellite fly over • 2014 – Sampling design test to optimize ground- truthing methods. • 2014 – Phycocyanin samples to model cyanobacteria density MLR Models • Employed Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression – Water quality variables as the dependent variable (chl
    [Show full text]