5 Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5 Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism 5 Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism It is not known when the directive power of the magnet 5.1 HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION - its ability to align consistently north-south - was first recognized. Early in the Han dynasty, between 300 and 5.1.1 The discovery of magnetism 200 BC, the Chinese fashioned a rudimentary compass Mankind's interest in magnetism began as a fascination out of lodestone. It consisted of a spoon-shaped object, with the curious attractive properties of the mineral lode­ whose bowl balanced and could rotate on a flat polished stone, a naturally occurring form of magnetite. Called surface. This compass may have been used in the search loadstone in early usage, the name derives from the old for gems and in the selection of sites for houses. Before English word load, meaning "way" or "course"; the load­ 1000 AD the Chinese had developed suspended and stone was literally a stone which showed a traveller the pivoted-needle compasses. Their directive power led to the way. use of compasses for navigation long before the origin of The earliest observations of magnetism were made the aligning forces was understood. As late as the twelfth before accurate records of discoveries were kept, so that century, it was supposed in Europe that the alignment of it is impossible to be sure of historical precedents. the compass arose from its attempt to follow the pole star. Nevertheless, Greek philosophers wrote about lodestone It was later shown that the compass alignment was pro­ around 800 BC and its properties were known to the duced by a property of the Earth itself. Subsequently, the Chinese by 300 Be. To the ancient Greeks science was characteristics of terrestrial magnetism played an impor­ equated with knowledge, and was considered an element tant role in advancing the understanding of magnetism. of philosophy. As a result, the attractive forces of lode­ stone were ascribed to metaphysical powers. Some early 5.1.2 Pioneering studies in terrestrial magnetism animistic philosophers even believed lodestone to possess a soul. Contemporary mechanistic schools of thought In 1269 the medieval scholar Pierre Pelerin de Maricourt, were equally superstitious and gave rise to false concep­ who took the Latin nom-de-plume of Petrus Peregrinus, tions that persisted for centuries. Foremost among these wrote the earliest known treatise of experimental physics was the view that electrical and magnetic forces were (Epistola de Magnete). In it he described simple laws of related to invisible fluids. This view persisted well into the magnetic attraction. He experimented with a spherical nineteenth century. The power of a magnet seemed to magnet made of lodestone, placing it on a flat slab of iron flow from one pole to the other along lines of induction and tracing the lines of direction which it assumed. These that could be made visible by sprinkling iron filings on a lines circled the lodestone sphere like geographical merid­ paper held over the magnet. The term "flux" (synony­ ians and converged at two antipodal points, which mous with flow) is still found in "magnetic flux density," Peregrinus called the poles of the magnet, by analogy to which is regularly used as an alternative to "magnetic the geographical poles. He called his magnetic sphere a induction" for the fundamental magnetic field vector B. terrella, for "little Earth." One of the greatest and wealthiest of the ancient It was known to the Chinese around 500 AD, in the Greek city-colonies in Asia Minor was the seaport of Tang dynasty, that magnetic compasses did not point Ephesus, at the mouth of the river Meander (modern exactly to geographical north, as defined by the stars. The Kucuk Menderes) in the Persian province of Caria, in local deviation of the magnetic meridian from the geo­ what is now the Turkish province of western Anatolia. In graphical meridian is called the magnetic declination. By the fifth century Be the Greek state of Thessaly founded the fourteenth century, the ships of the British navy were a colony on the Meander close to Ephesus called equipped with a mariner's compass, which became an Magnesia, which after 133 BC was incorporated into the essential tool for navigation. It was used in conjunction Roman empire as Magnesia ad Maeandrum. In the vicin­ with celestial methods, and gradually it became apparent ity of Magnesia the Greeks found a ready supply of lode­ that the declination changed with position on the globe. stone, pieces of which subsequently became known by the During the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries the world­ Latin word magneta from which the term magnetism wide pattern of declination was established. By the derives. end of the sixteenth century, Mercator recognized that 281 282 Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism declination was the principal cause of error in contempo­ properties of magnets (e.g., the concentration of their rary map-making. powers at their poles) had been established, but the accu­ Georg Hartmann, a German cleric, discovered in 1544 mulated observations were unable to provide a more fun­ that a magnetized needle assumed a non-horizontal atti­ damental understanding of the phenomena because they tude in the vertical plane. The deviation from the horizon­ were not quantitative. A major advance was achieved by tal is now called the magnetic inclination. He reported his Charles Augustin de Coulomb (1736-1806), the son of a discovery in a letter to his superior, Duke Albrecht of noted French family. who in 1784 invented a torsion Prussia, who evidently was not impressed. The letter lay balance that enabled him to make quantitative measure­ unknown to the world in the royal archives until its dis­ merits of electrostatic and magnetic properties. In 1785 he covery in 1831. Meanwhile, an English scientist, Robert published the results of his intensive studies. He estab­ Norman, rediscovered the inclination of the Earth's mag­ lished the inverse-square law of attraction and repulsion netic field independently in 1576. between slTIaII electrically charged balls. Using thin, mag­ In 1600 Willianl Gilbert (1544-1603), an English scien­ netized steel needles about 24 inches (61 em) in length, he tist and physician to Queen Elizabeth, published De also established that the attraction or repulsion between Magnete, a landmark treatise in which he summarized all their poles varied as the inverse square of their separation. that was then known about magnetism, including the Alessandro Volta (1745-1827) invented the voltaic cell results of about seventeen years of his own research. His with which electrical currents could be produced. The studies extended also to the electrostatic effects seen when relationship between electrical currents and magnetism some materials were rubbed, for which he coined the name was detected in 1820 by Hans Christian Oersted "electricity" from the Greek word for amber. Gilbert was (1777-1851), a Danish physicist. During experiments the first to distinguish clearly between electrical and mag­ with a battery of voltaic cells he observed that a magnetic netic phenomena. His magnetic studies followed the work needle is deflected at rightangles to a conductor carrying of Peregrinus three centuries earlier. Using small magnetic a current, thus establishing that an electrical current pro­ needles placed on the surface of a sphere of lodestone to duces a magnetic force. study its magnetic field, he recognized the poles, where the Oersted's result was met with great enthusiasm and needles stood on end, and the equator, where they lay par­ was followed at once by other notable discoveries in the allel to the surface. Gilbert achieved the leap of irnagina­ same year. The law for the direction and strength of the tion that was necessary to see the analogy between the magnetic force near a current-carrying wire was soon for­ attraction of the lodestone sphere and the known mag­ mulated by the French physicists Jean-Baptiste Biot netic properties of the Earth. He recognized that the Earth (1774-1862) and Felix Savart (1791-1841). Their compa­ itself behaved like a large magnet. This was the first triot Andre Marie Ampere (1775-1836) quickly under­ unequivocal recognition of a geophysical property, pre­ took a systematic set of experiments, He showed that a ceding the laws of gravitation in Newton's Principia by force existed between two parallel straight current­ almost a century. Although founded largely on qualitative carrying wires, and that it was of a type different from the observations, De Magnete was the most important work known electrical forces. Ampere experimented with the on magnetism until the nineteenth century. magnetic forces produced by current loops and proposed The discovery that the declination of the geomagnetic that internal electrical currents were responsible for the field changed with time was made by Henry Gellibrand existence of magnetism in iron objects (i.e., ferromagnet­ (1597-1637)'1 an English mathematician and astronomer, ism). This idea of permanent magnetism due to con­ in 1634. He noted, on the basis of just three measure­ stantly flowing currents was audacious for its time. ments made by William Borough in 1580'1 Edmund At this stage, the ability of electrical currents to gener­ Gunter in 1622 and himself in 1634, that the declination ate magnetic fields was known, but it fell to the English had decreased by about 7° in this time. From these few scien tist Michael Faraday (1791-1867) to demonstrate observations he deduced what is now called the secular in 1831 what he called "magneto-electric' induction. variation of the field. Faraday came from a humble background and had little Gradually the variation of the terrestrial magnetic mathematical training. Yet he was a gifted experimenter, field over the surface of the Earth was established. In and his results demonstrated that the change of magnetic 1698-1700 Edmund Halley, the English astronomer and flux in a coil (whether produced by introducing a magnet mathematician, carried out an important oceanographic or by the change in current in another coil) induced an survey with the prime purpose of studying compass vari­ electric current in the coil.
Recommended publications
  • CERI 7022/8022 Global Geophysics Spring 2016
    FerrimagnetismI I Recall three types of magnetic properties of materials I Diamagnetism I Paramagnetism I Ferromagnetism I Anti-ferromagnetism I Parasitic ferromagnetism I Ferrimagnetism I Ferrimagnetism I Spinel structure is one of the common crystal structure of rock-forming minerals. I Tetrahedral and octahedral sites form two sublattices. 2+ 3+ I Fe in 1/8 of tetrahedral sites, Fe in 1/2 of octahedral sites. FerrimagnetismII I xmujpkc.xmu.edu.cn/jghx/source/chapter9.pdf Ferrimagnetism III I www.tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/def_en/kap_2/basics/b2_1_6.html I Anti-spinel structure of the most common iron oxides 3+ 3+ 2+ I Fe in 1/8 tetrahedral sites, (Fe , Fe ) in 1/2 of octahedral sites. FerrimagnetismIV I Indirect exchange involves antiparallel and unequal magnetization of the sublattices, a net spontaneous magnetization appears. This phenomenon is called ferrimagnetism. I Ferrimagnetic materials are called ferrites. I Ferrites exhibit magnetic hysteresis and retain remanent magnetization (i.e. behaves like ferromagnets.) I Above the Curie temperature, becomes paramagnetic. I Magnetite (Fe3O4), maghemite, pyrrhotite and goethite (' rust). Magnetic properties of rocksI I Matrix minerals are mainly silicates or carbonates, which are diamagnetic. I Secondary minerals (e.g., clays) have paramagnetic properties. I So, the bulk of constituent minerals have a magnetic susceptibility but not remanent magnetic properties. I Variable concentrations of ferrimagnetic and matrix minerals result in a wide range of susceptibilities in rocks. Magnetic properties of rocksII I I The weak and variable concentration of ferrimagnetic minerals plays a key role in determining the magnetic properties of the rock. Magnetic properties of rocks III I Important factors influencing rock magnetism: I The type of ferrimagnetic mineral.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Earth's Magnetism
    THE STUDY OF EARTH’S MAGNETISM (1269-1950): A FOUNDATION BY PEREGRINUS AND SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMAGNETISM AND PALEOMAGNETISM Vincent Courtillot, Jean-Louis Le Mouël To cite this version: Vincent Courtillot, Jean-Louis Le Mouël. THE STUDY OF EARTH’S MAGNETISM (1269-1950): A FOUNDATION BY PEREGRINUS AND SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMAGNETISM AND PALEOMAGNETISM. Reviews of Geophysics, American Geophysical Union, 2007, 45 (3), pp.RG3008. 10.1029/2006RG000198. insu-02448801 HAL Id: insu-02448801 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-02448801 Submitted on 22 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THE STUDY OF EARTH’S MAGNETISM (1269–1950): A FOUNDATION BY PEREGRINUS AND SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMAGNETISM AND PALEOMAGNETISM Vincent Courtillot1 and Jean-Louis Le Moue¨l1 Received 17 February 2006; revised 14 July 2006; accepted 18 September 2006; published 25 September 2007. [1] This paper summarizes the histories of geomagnetism induced magnetizations), Delesse (remagnetization in a and paleomagnetism (1269–1950). The role of Peregrinus direction opposite to the original), and Melloni (direction of is emphasized. In the sixteenth century a debate on local lava magnetization acquired at time of cooling).
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Beam Dynamics II - Longitudinal
    Chapter 3 Beam Dynamics II - Longitudinal Sequences of Gaps Transit Time Factor Phase Stability Chapter 3 Longitudinal Beam Dynamics 1 The Faraday Cage Protons are confined in a conducting box, at low energy. Assume they can bounce off the walls with no energy loss. Move the switch from position A to B. The potential on the box rises from 0 to 1 MV. What is the proton energy now? Chapter 3 Longitudinal Beam Dynamics 2 The Linac Drift Tube A linear accelerator (linac) is comprised of a succession of drift tubes. These drift tubes have holes in their ends so the particles can enter and exit, and when particles are inside the drift tube, a Faraday Cage, the potential of the drift tube may vary without changing the energy of the particle. Acceleration takes place when a charged particle is subjected to a field. The field inside the Faraday cage is not affected by the potential outside. (Aside from fields generated by the protons themselves, the field inside the Faraday cage is zero.) The drift tubes are arranged in a sequence with a passage through their middle for the particles to pass. The field in the gap between the drift tubes accelerates the particles. Chapter 3 Longitudinal Beam Dynamics 3 Some Actual Linac Configurations We will look at: Sloan-Lawrence Structure (Ising, Wideroe) Alvarez Structure RFQ Structure Coupled-Cavity Structure Chapter 3 Longitudinal Beam Dynamics 4 Some Kinematics For simplicity, we will assume the particles are non-relativistic. The normalized velocity is 2T = m c2 T is the kinetic energy of the particle, mc2 is the rest mass, 938 MeV for protons.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Earth's Magnetic Field Reversing? ⁎ Catherine Constable A, , Monika Korte B
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 246 (2006) 1–16 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Frontiers Is Earth's magnetic field reversing? ⁎ Catherine Constable a, , Monika Korte b a Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0225, USA b GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany Received 7 October 2005; received in revised form 21 March 2006; accepted 23 March 2006 Editor: A.N. Halliday Abstract Earth's dipole field has been diminishing in strength since the first systematic observations of field intensity were made in the mid nineteenth century. This has led to speculation that the geomagnetic field might now be in the early stages of a reversal. In the longer term context of paleomagnetic observations it is found that for the current reversal rate and expected statistical variability in polarity interval length an interval as long as the ongoing 0.78 Myr Brunhes polarity interval is to be expected with a probability of less than 0.15, and the preferred probability estimates range from 0.06 to 0.08. These rather low odds might be used to infer that the next reversal is overdue, but the assessment is limited by the statistical treatment of reversals as point processes. Recent paleofield observations combined with insights derived from field modeling and numerical geodynamo simulations suggest that a reversal is not imminent. The current value of the dipole moment remains high compared with the average throughout the ongoing 0.78 Myr Brunhes polarity interval; the present rate of change in Earth's dipole strength is not anomalous compared with rates of change for the past 7 kyr; furthermore there is evidence that the field has been stronger on average during the Brunhes than for the past 160 Ma, and that high average field values are associated with longer polarity chrons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planeterrella Experiment: from Individual Initiative to Networking J
    submitted to Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate c The author(s) under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license The Planeterrella experiment: from individual initiative to networking J. Lilensten1, G. Provan2, S. Grimald3, A. Brekke4, E. Fluckiger¨ 5, P. Vanlommel6, C. Simon Wedlund6, M. Barthel´ emy´ 1, and P. Garnier3 1 Institut de Plantologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble, 38041 Grenoble, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institution University of Leicester, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected] 3 IRAP, e-mail: [email protected] 4 History of Geoph. and Space Sciences journal, e-mail: [email protected] 5 Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern, Switzerland, e-mail: [email protected] 6 Royal Observatory of Belgium e-mail: [email protected] 7 e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Space weather is a relatively new discipline which is generally unknown to the wider public, de- spite its increasing importance to all of our daily lives. Outreach activities can help in promoting the concept of space weather. In particular the visual beauty and excitement of the aurora make these lights a wonderful inspirational hook. A century ago Norwegian experimental physicist Kristian Birkeland, one of the founding fathers of modern space science, demonstrated with his Terrella experiment the formation of the aurora. Recently a modernised version of the Terrella has been designed. This Planeterrella experiment is very flexible, allowing the visualization of many phenomena occurring in our space environment. Although the Planeterrella was originally designed to be small to be demonstrated locally by a scientist, the Planeterrella has proved to be a very successful public outreach experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Surveying for Buried Metallic Objects
    Reprinted from the Summer 1990 Issue of Ground Water Monitoring Review Magnetic Surveying for Buried Metallic Objects by Larry Barrows and Judith E. Rocchio Abstract Field tests were conducted to determine representative total-intensity magnetic anomalies due to the presence of underground storage tanks and 55-gallon steel drums. Three different drums were suspended from a non-magnetic tripod and the underlying field surveyed with each drum in an upright and a flipped plus rotated orientation. At drum-to-sensor separations of 11 feet, the anomalies had peak values of around 50 gammas and half-widths about equal to the drum-to-sensor separation. Remanent and induced magnetizations were comparable; crushing one of the drums significantly reduced both. A profile over a single underground storage tank had a 1000-gamma anomaly, which was similar to the modeled anomaly due to an infinitely long cylinder horizontally magnetized perpendicular to its axis. A profile over two adjacent tanks had a. smooth 350-gamma single-peak anomaly even though models of two tanks produced dual-peaked anomalies. Demagnetization could explain why crushing a drum reduced its induced magnetization and why two adjacent tanks produced a single-peak anomaly. A 40-acre abandoned landfill was surveyed on a 50- by 100-foot rectangular grid and along several detailed profiles; The observed field had broad positive and negative anomalies that were similar to modeled anomalies due to thickness variations in a layer of uniformly magnetized material. It was not comparable to the anomalies due to induced magnetization in multiple, randomly located, randomly sized, independent spheres, suggesting that demagne- tization may have limited the effective susceptibility of the landfill material.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock and Paleomagnetic Investigations Technical Detailed
    NWM-USGS-GPP-06 RO Rock and Paleomagnetic Investigations Technical Detailed Procedure GPP-O NNWSI Project Quality Assurance Program U.S. Geological Survey Effective Date: pepared by: Joseph Rosenbaum Technical Reviewer: Richard Reynolds 'Branch Chief: Adel Zohdy NNWI Project Coordinator: W. Dudley Quality Assurance: P. L. Bussolini 8502210165 841130 PDR WASTE PDR Wm-II NWM-USGS-GPP- 06, RO NWM-USGS-GPP- o RO Page 2 of 13 Rock and Paleomagnetic Investigations 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure provides a means of assuring the accuracy, validity, and applicability of the methods used to determine paleomagnetic and rock magnetic properties. 1.2 The procedure documents the USGS responsibilities for quality assurance training and enforcement, the processes and authority for procedure modification and revision, the requirements for procedure and personnel interfacing, and to whom the procedure applies. 1.3 The procedure describes the system components, the principles of the methods used, and the limits of their use. 1.4 The procedure describes the detailed methods to be used, where applicable, for system checkout and maintenance, calibration, operation and performance verification. 1.5 The procedure defines the requirements for data acceptance, documentation and control; and provides a means of data traceability. 1.6 The procedure provides a guide for USGS personnel and their contractors engaged to determining paleomagnetic and rock mag- netic properties and a means by which the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) can evaluate these activities in meeting requirements for the NNWSI repository. 2.0 SCOPE OF COMPLIANCE 2.1 This procedure applies to all USGS personnel, and persons assigned by the USGS, who perform work on the procedure as described by the work activity given in Section 1.1, or use data from such activities, if the activities or data are deemed by the USGS Project Coordinator to potentially affect public health and safety as related to a nuclear waste repository.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Signature of the Leucogranite in Örsviken
    UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG Department of Earth Sciences Geovetarcentrum/Earth Science Centre Magnetic signature of the leucogranite in Örsviken Hannah Berg Johanna Engelbrektsson ISSN 1400-3821 B774 Bachelor of Science thesis Göteborg 2014 Mailing address Address Telephone Telefax Geovetarcentrum Geovetarcentrum Geovetarcentrum 031-786 19 56 031-786 19 86 Göteborg University S 405 30 Göteborg Guldhedsgatan 5A S-405 30 Göteborg SWEDEN Abstract A proton magnetometer is a useful tool in detecting magnetic anomalies that originate from sources at varying depths within the Earth’s crust. This makes magnetic investigations a good way to gather 3D geological information. A field investigation of a part of a cape that consists of a leucogranite in Örsviken, 20 kilometres south of Gothenburg, was of interest after high susceptibility values had been discovered in the area. The investigation was carried out with a proton magnetometer and a hand-held susceptibility meter in order to obtain the magnetic anomalies and susceptibility values. High magnetic anomalies were observed on the southern part of the cape and further south and west below the water surface. The data collected were then processed in Surfer11® and in Encom ModelVision 11.00 in order to make 2D and 3D magnetometric models of the total magnetic field in the study area as well as visualizing the geometry and extent of the rock body of interest. The results from the investigation and modelling indicate that the leucogranite extends south and west of the cape below the water surface. Magnetite is interpreted to be the cause of the high susceptibility values. The leucogranite is a possible A-type alkali granite with an anorogenic or a post-orogenic petrogenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • United States National Museum
    Contributions from The Museum of History and Technology: Paper 8 The Natural Philosophy of William Gilbert and His Predecessors IV. James King 121 By W James King THE NATURAL PHILOSOPHY OF WILLIAM GILBERT AND HIS PREDECESSORS Until several decades ago, the physical sciences were considered to have had their origins in the 17th century— mechanics beginning with men Like Galileo Galilei and magnetism ivith men like the Elixjihcthan physician and scientist William Gilbert. Historians of science, however, have traced many of the 17th century's concepts of tncchanics hack into the Middle Ages. Here, Gilbert' s explanation of the loadstone and its powers is compared with explanations to he found in the Middle Ages and earlier. From this comparison it appears that Gilbert can best be understood by considering him not so much a herald of the new science as a modifier of the old. The Author : W. James King is curator of electricity. Museum of History and Technology, in the Smithsonian Institution' s United States National Musettm. THE \K.\R 1600 SAW the puhlkiition Ijy an English for such a tradition by determining what (iilbert's physician, William Gilbert, of a book on the original contributions to these sciences were, and loadstone. Entitled De magnele, ' it has traditionally to make explicit the sense in which he may be con- been credited with laying a foundation for the sidered as being dependent upon earlier work. In modern science of electricity and magnetism. The this manner a more accurate estimate of his position following essay is an attempt U) examine the basis in the history of science may be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleomagnetism and U-Pb Geochronology of the Late Cretaceous Chisulryoung Volcanic Formation, Korea
    Jeong et al. Earth, Planets and Space (2015) 67:66 DOI 10.1186/s40623-015-0242-y FULL PAPER Open Access Paleomagnetism and U-Pb geochronology of the late Cretaceous Chisulryoung Volcanic Formation, Korea: tectonic evolution of the Korean Peninsula Doohee Jeong1, Yongjae Yu1*, Seong-Jae Doh2, Dongwoo Suk3 and Jeongmin Kim4 Abstract Late Cretaceous Chisulryoung Volcanic Formation (CVF) in southeastern Korea contains four ash-flow ignimbrite units (A1, A2, A3, and A4) and three intervening volcano-sedimentary layers (S1, S2, and S3). Reliable U-Pb ages obtained for zircons from the base and top of the CVF were 72.8 ± 1.7 Ma and 67.7 ± 2.1 Ma, respectively. Paleomagnetic analysis on pyroclastic units yielded mean magnetic directions and virtual geomagnetic poles (VGPs) as D/I = 19.1°/49.2° (α95 =4.2°,k = 76.5) and VGP = 73.1°N/232.1°E (A95 =3.7°,N =3)forA1,D/I = 24.9°/52.9° (α95 =5.9°,k =61.7)and VGP = 69.4°N/217.3°E (A95 =5.6°,N=11) for A3, and D/I = 10.9°/50.1° (α95 =5.6°,k = 38.6) and VGP = 79.8°N/ 242.4°E (A95 =5.0°,N = 18) for A4. Our best estimates of the paleopoles for A1, A3, and A4 are in remarkable agreement with the reference apparent polar wander path of China in late Cretaceous to early Paleogene, confirming that Korea has been rigidly attached to China (by implication to Eurasia) at least since the Cretaceous. The compiled paleomagnetic data of the Korean Peninsula suggest that the mode of clockwise rotations weakened since the mid-Jurassic.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Aeromagnetic Anomaly Map of California
    PRELIMINARY AEROMAGNETIC ANOMALY MAP OF CALIFORNIA By Carter W. Roberts and Robert C. Jachens Open-File Report 99-440 1999 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1 INTRODUCTION The magnetization in crustal rocks is the vector sum of induced in minerals by the Earth’s present main field and the remanent magnetization of minerals susceptible to magnetization (chiefly magnetite) (Blakely, 1995). The direction of remanent magnetization acquired during the rock’s history can be highly variable. Crystalline rocks generally contain sufficient magnetic minerals to cause variations in the Earth’s magnetic field that can be mapped by aeromagnetic surveys. Sedimentary rocks are generally weakly magnetized and consequently have a small effect on the magnetic field: thus a magnetic anomaly map can be used to “see through” the sedimentary rock cover and can convey information on lithologic contrasts and structural trends related to the underlying crystalline basement (see Nettleton,1971; Blakely, 1995). The magnetic anomaly map (fig. 2) provides a synoptic view of major anomalies and contributes to our understanding of the tectonic development of California. Reference fields, that approximate the Earth’s main (core) field, have been subtracted from the recorded magnetic data. The resulting map of the total magnetic anomalies exhibits anomaly patterns related to the distribution of magnetized crustal rocks at depths shallower than the Curie point isotherm (the surface within the Earth beneath which temperatures are so high that rocks lose their magnetic properties).
    [Show full text]