DOCSLIB.ORG

Branches of Unovis in Smolensk and Orenburg

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Branches of Unovis in Smolensk and Orenburg Chapter 6 Branches of Unovis in Smolensk and Orenburg Alexander Lisov Kazimir Malevich realised that Suprematism could only be firmly established as a substantial art movement in Russia with the support of an association of like-minded individuals. He had thought about this a long time before he arrived in Vitebsk on 5 November 1919, but he only succeeded in actually or- ganising such an association in Vitebsk, where he established a ‘party of Supre- matism’, Unovis (Utverditeli novogo iskusstva – Champions of the New Art), in January-February of 1920. By the summer of that year, the Suprematists dom- inated the school. From the very beginning of Unovis, Malevich intended to extend the influence of his ideas beyond Vitebsk. He counted on gaining the support of art schools in other Russian cities, including Moscow, and securing the assistance of artists with whom he had already cooperated. The author of the first brief account of the group’s origin, published in the Unovis almanac, was probably Ivan Gavris. At the end of May 1920, he reported that ‘during the comparatively short period of its existence, Unovis has man- aged to make contact with and organise Unovis in other cities’.1 It is clear from the text that one of these branches was in Smolensk. In fact, Gavris names no other cities in which branches were established. Evidently, the possibility of setting up other branches of Unovis had been discussed from the moment of its creation in Vitebsk. In this endeavour, Malevich’s working relations with his former students at the Second State Free Art Studios (Gosudarstvennye svobodnye khudozhestvennye masterskie – Svomas) in Moscow were vital. The artist evidently worked on creating other branches of Unovis by corre- spondence, which unfortunately is not preserved in its entirety.2 First of all, 1 [I.T. Gavris], ‘Kratkaia istoriia vozniknoveniia “Unovis”’, Unovis No. 1 (Vitebsk: Unovis, 1920), [sheet 44]; reprinted in ‘Unovis No. 1. Vitebsk. 1920. Prilozhenie k faksimil’nomu izdaniiu’, in Unovis No. 1. Vitebsk. 1920. Faksimil’noe izdanie, ed. Tat’iana Goriacheva (Moscow: State Tretyakov Gallery / Izdatel’stvo Skanrus, 2003), 88-90; English translation as ‘A Short History of the Origins of Unovis’, in Larissa A. Zhadova, Malevich: Suprematism and Revolution in Russian Art 1910-1930, trans. Alexander Lieven (London: Thames and Hudson, 1982), 305-309. 2 For surviving items of correspondence, see Kazimir Malevich, Letters, Documents, Memoirs and Criticism, Russian edition: eds., Irina A. Vakar and Tatiana N. Mikhienko; English edition: trans. Antonina W. Bouis, ed. Wendy Salmond, general ed. Charlotte Douglas (London: Tate Publishing, 2015), 2 vols. © KoninklijkeBrillNV,Leiden, 2019 | DOI:10.1163/9789004384989_008 BranchesofUnovisinSmolenskandOrenburg 127 Malevich turned to Petr Miturich in Moscow who was close to Velimir Khleb- nikov and to Grigorii Petnikov in Kharkov. It is revealing that Unovis, like the earlier Supremus group, was conceived as an alliance of innovators, not only in the field of fine arts, but also in literature, music, and the theatre. Malevich placed great hopes on the conference at the State Free Art Studios in Moscow and on the accompanying exhibition of the Vitebsk Unovis in June 1920. The exhibition was intended to demonstrate the organisation’s successes and the quality of Malevich’s pedagogical system. He was not disappointed. Branches of Unovis began to be set up in Perm, Ekaterinburg, Samara, Saratov, and Odessa. A special role was played by the branches in nearby Smolensk and Orenburg, where some degree of success was achieved in developing and applying the principles of Malevich’s system, and where the artist himself be- came directly involved in their activities. Malevich regarded Unovis as an organisation of representatives of the most recent art trends – Cubism, Futurism and Suprematism. Among these, Supre- matism was naturally the ultimate goal and was seen as the culmination of painting’s evolution. He called Unovis ‘a party in art’, an association of like- minded creative figures, who would fight for Suprematism, its philosophy and world view. Malevich made these attitudes clear in his article entitled ‘Con- cerning a Party in Art’.3 Yet Malevich also thought about Unovis in relation to the practical tasks of art education. He realised that, in the current situa- tion, he needed to promote the programme of artistic training (that he had developed) in the provincial art schools and gain support there, before he would be able to introduce his approach to the capital. It would clearly not be possible for his ideas to gain immediate acceptance in the centre, since he had encountered such strong opposition from the leadership of the Moscow State Free Art Studios, as well as from the Department of Fine Arts within the People’s Commissariat of Education (Otdel izobrazitel’nykh iskusstv, Nar- odnyi komissariat prosveshcheniia – IZO Narkompros) in the person of David Shterenberg. Malevich counted on gaining the support of the student masses and like-minded artists in the provinces. He thought of his stay in Vitebsk as temporary and forced. Once he had acquired support, then his new pedagog- ical system would be approved and implemented throughout the new Russia. This was one of his main concerns in 1920-1921. 3 Kazimir Malevich, ‘O partii v iskusstve’ [Concerning a Party in Art], Put’ Unovisa, 1 (Jan- uary 1921); reprinted in Kazimir Malevich, Sobranie sochinenii v piati tomakh, ed. Aleksandra Shatskikh (Moscow: Gileia, 1995), I: 223-230; English translation in Anna Kafetsi, ed., Russian Avant-Garde 1910-1930: The G. Costakis Collection: Theory – Criticism (Athens: Ministry of Cul- ture, National Gallery / Alexandros Soutzos Museum; and Delphi: European Cultural Centre of Delphi, 1995), 556-558..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2
    MIT 4.602, Modern Art and Mass Culture (HASS-D) Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2 PHOTOGRAPHY, PROPAGANDA, MONTAGE: Soviet Avant-Garde “We are all primitives of the 20th century” – Ivan Kliun, 1916 UNOVIS members’ aims include the “study of the system of Suprematist projection and the designing of blueprints and plans in accordance with it; ruling off the earth’s expanse into squares, giving each energy cell its place in the overall scheme; organization and accommodation on the earth’s surface of all its intrinsic elements, charting those points and lines out of which the forms of Suprematism will ascend and slip into space.” — Ilya Chashnik , 1921 I. Making “Modern Man” A. Kasimir Malevich – Suprematism 1) Suprematism begins ca. 1913, influenced by Cubo-Futurism 2) Suprematism officially launched, 1915 – manifesto and exhibition titled “0.10 The Last Futurist Exhibition” in Petrograd. B. El (Elazar) Lissitzky 1) “Proun” as utopia 2) Types, and the new modern man C. Modern Woman? 1) Sonia Terk Delaunay in Paris a) “Orphism” or “organic Cubism” 1911 b) “Simultaneous” clothing, ceramics, textiles, cars 1913-20s 2) Natalia Goncharova, “Rayonism” 3) Lyubov Popova, Varvara Stepanova stage designs II. Monuments without Beards -- Vladimir Tatlin A. Constructivism (developed in parallel with Suprematism as sculptural variant) B. Productivism (the tweaking of “l’art pour l’art” to be more socialist) C. Monument to the Third International (Tatlin’s Tower), 1921 III. Collapse of the Avant-Garde? A. 1937 Paris Exposition, 1937 Entartete Kunst, 1939 Popular Front B.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Architecture of the Book": El Lissitzky's Works on Paper, 1919-1937
    "The Architecture of the Book": El Lissitzky's Works on Paper, 1919-1937 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Johnson, Samuel. 2015. "The Architecture of the Book": El Lissitzky's Works on Paper, 1919-1937. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17463124 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA “The Architecture of the Book”: El Lissitzky’s Works on Paper, 1919-1937 A dissertation presented by Samuel Johnson to The Department of History of Art and Architecture in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of Art and Architecture Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 Samuel Johnson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Maria Gough Samuel Johnson “The Architecture of the Book”: El Lissitzky’s Works on Paper, 1919-1937 Abstract Although widely respected as an abstract painter, the Russian Jewish artist and architect El Lissitzky produced more works on paper than in any other medium during his twenty year career. Both a highly competent lithographer and a pioneer in the application of modernist principles to letterpress typography, Lissitzky advocated for works of art issued in “thousands of identical originals” even before the avant-garde embraced photography and film.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Art School and Unovis in Vitebsk (University of Cambridge, 19 & 20 April 2018)
    H-Russia Conference: The People's Art School and Unovis in Vitebsk (University of Cambridge, 19 & 20 April 2018) Discussion published by Isabel Stokholm on Thursday, March 29, 2018 International conference: ‘The People's Art School and Unovis in Vitebsk' Pembroke College, University of Cambridge 19 & 20 April 2018 In the devastating years that followed Russia's 1917 October Revolution, a small provincial town in present-day Belarus witnessed the founding of a revolutionary new art school. At its helm was Marc Chagall, a native of Vitebsk newly returned from Paris, who was soon joined by fellow avangardisti in the form of Kazimir Malevich and El Lissitzky. Together with students and colleagues, and against the backdrop of a raging civil war, this exceptional group of artists elaborated a new path for artistic education and collective creativity that had a profound influence far beyond the boundaries of Vitebsk. Organised by the Cambridge Courtauld Russian Art Centre (CCRAC) in collaboration with the Van Abbemuseum, Eindhoven and generously supported by the In Artibus Foundation and Pembroke College, Cambridge, this conference complements the major exhibition, Chagall, Lissitzky, Malevich: Vitebsk 1918-1922, which opens this spring in Paris’s Centre Pompidou (28 March – 23 July 2018). The event draws together fifteen senior academics and emerging scholars from Belarus, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Russia, the US and UK to consider anew this vital period – one that is often lost within the broader history of Russia’s celebrated avant-garde. With papers devoted to a wide range of media, from Russian-Jewish painting to porcelain and Suprematist ballet, this conference aims to reveal just what made a short-lived venture far from Russia’s artistic centres so innovative and far-reaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas City Art Institute: ARTHI241 Constructivism and the Bauhaus Tuesday/Thursday 2:30-3:50Pm, EB 217
    Kansas City Art Institute: ARTHI241 Constructivism and The Bauhaus Tuesday/Thursday 2:30-3:50pm, EB 217 Professor: Maria Elena Buszek Office: 304 Baty House (ext 3378), e-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: T/Th, 11:00a.m.-12:30p.m., or by appointment Helpsite: http://www.flatblacknova.com/buszek (go to “Constructivism and The Bauhaus” to enter our class’ primary site) Course Description: This course will deal with the utopian experiments in art and theory to emerge from the Russian Constructivist mov ement and the German Bauhaus academy in the years between the two World Wars. In both Constructivism and The Bauhaus, one finds some of the most influential ideas on the integration of art and everyday life in history—affecting our world to this very day—which we will study through the objects and writings created by the artists associated with each. Since the course deals as much with history as with art, we will also be exploring the different historical events, artistic media and philosophical theories that inform the artworks presented in the class. Grading: Your grade will be based on two exams and one short paper. All these grades hold equal weight in determining your grade, which means your final grade will be based on the average of these four grades. Because the exams will be slide intensive, resulting in the impossibility of giving examinations anywhere outside of our class period/classroom, there can be no make-ups of either examination. Because you will have plenty of lead-time to research and compose your paper—the due date of which has been included in the schedule from the beginning of the semester—late papers will not be accepted under any circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardcorist Lectores
    S20 FRANKOWSKI+GARCIA FRANKOWSKI+GARCIA S20 MANIFESTO In a drive for human emancipation, the last hundred years witnessed the creation of various avant-garde schools, workshops, and laboratories that strived to blur the boundary between art, architecture and life. HARDCORIST Starting with the People’s Art School in Vitebsk in 1918, and followed by the Bauhaus (1919), Unovis (1919), Vhkutemas (1920), GINKhUK (1923) and Black Mountain College (1933), a century of turmoil paved the way to a series of transcendental institutions set to liberate architecture from the constraints of previous epochs. A hundred years after the foundation of Unovis, Bauhaus and Vhkutemas, ‘HARDCORIST LECTORES LECTORES AND THEIR WORLDMAKING LABORATORIES’ reconsiders the relationship between pure form, radical pedagogy, and the creation of spaces for the exploration and development of critical forms of architecture. HARDCORIST LECTORES AND THEIR WORLDMAKING AND THEIR WORLDMAKING LABORATORIES LABORATORIES’ explores the possibility of Universal Workshops and Architectures of Emancipation. If a theory is critical inasmuch as it seeks for forms of human emancipation, Nathalie FRANKOWSKI + Cruz GARCIA critical architecture employs its mediums, strat¬egies, methods, concepts, narratives, spaces and forms to lib¬erate WAI Architecture Think Tank humans from the pressing challenges of our times. In the midst of environmental decay to the point of no return, with the asphyxiating grip of neoliberal The only purpose of capitalism, and the crushing socio- economic effects of the Anthropocene, education is to make the gospel of the Cubo-Futurist Opera Victory Over the Sun seems not so new worlds collectively. distant after all. This requires the practice ‘HARDCORIST LECTORES of curiosity as a daily AND THEIR WORLDMAKING LABORATORIES’ reconsiders the habit and the exercise of relation¬ship between radical form and radical program, as buildings become dignified and purposeful inseparable from the activities, programs rebelliousness.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Avant-Garde Art and Bolshevik Time* Debates Among These
    The images reproduced here accord with fair use. Please acknowledge credits. 1 © Susan Buck-Morss, 2006. * Avant-Garde Art and Bolshevik Time ," t po a e , T l a Debates among these "Futurists," as c . r. " apot i ori e l t ow m T s a Lenin called all of these experimental groups, i c i c z . a r. os H i ori e t t ow were waged on numerous issues, but they shared m s i a c , M i h, K t z c a os H um vi e a general tendency in their move t e e “Art of the l a , M h, K t a us c proletariat is not a M 1923. S M um away from art -- particularly away vi e e holy shrine where l a us from oil painting -- and into "life," things are lazily M 1923. S M regarded, but work, e t a factory which a the lived experience of the everyday. a t r produces new nd a r artistic things.” nd rva . They understood their work not as a a rva kovo S a um Cup a . - Nikolai Punin, 1918 e kovo us Cup documenting the revolution but as nd V . " us us um a nd V e i . “ a a i realizing it, serving (and also leading) the us n M a kova i kol a kova i l 1923. K e kol n M hni i i proletariat in the active building of a new society. s 1923. K a hni r," l s vi n, N orc e e i r,” t vi n, N P e i uc Constructivists and Suprematists and others of e t ue a orc t uc a S Ruka S P ue a t S Ruka S S the avant-garde both turned to "production art," applying their earlier formal and technical innovations to the design of everyday objects and architectural spaces that the masses would produce and use.1 Although production art was variously practiced, it provided the sense of a shared political task.2 "The proletariat * Based on material from Susan Buck-Morss, Dreamworld and Catastrophe: The Passing of Mass Utopia in East and West.
    [Show full text]
  • Following the Black Square: the Cosmic, the Nostalgic & the Transformative in Russian Avant-Garde Museology Teofila Cruz-Uri
    Following The Black Square: The Cosmic, The Nostalgic & The Transformative In Russian Avant-Garde Museology Teofila Cruz-Uribe A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies: Russia, East Europe and Central Asia University of Washington 2017 Committee: Glennys Young James West José Alaniz Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Jackson School of International Studies Cruz-Uribe ©Copyright 2017 Teofila Cruz-Uribe 1 Cruz-Uribe University of Washington Abstract Following The Black Square: The Cosmic, The Nostalgic & The Transformative In Russian Avant-Garde Museology ​ ​ Teofila Cruz-Uribe Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Jon Bridgman Endowed Professor Glennys Young History Department & Jackson School of International Studies Contemporary Russian art and museology is experiencing a revival of interest in the pioneering museology of the Russian artistic and political avant-garde of the early 20th century. This revival is exemplified in the work of contemporary Russian conceptual artist and self-styled ‘avant-garde museologist’ Arseniy Zhilyaev (b. 1984). Influential early 20th century Russian avant-garde artist and museologist Kazimir Malevich acts as the ‘tether’ binding the museologies of the past and present together, his famous “Black Square” a recurring visual and metaphoric indicator of the inspiration that contemporary Russian avant-garde museology and art is taking from its predecessors. This thesis analyzes Zhilyaev’s artistic and museological philosophy and work and determines how and where they are informed by Bolshevik-era avant-garde museology. This thesis also asks why such inspirations and influences are being felt and harnessed at this particular juncture in post-Soviet culture.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chagall, Lissitzky, Malevich: the Russian Avant-Garde in Vitebsk
    1 Chagall, Lissitzky, Malevich: The Russian Avant-Garde in Vitebsk, 1918-1922 The Jewish Museum September 14, 2018-January 6, 2019 Wall Texts and Object Labels Chagall, Lissitzky, Malevich: The Russian Avant-Garde in Vitebsk, 1918–1922, is organized by the Centre Pompidou, Paris, in collaboration with the Jewish Museum, New York. Angela Lampe Curator of Modern Collections, Musée National d’Art Moderne Exhibition Curator Claudia J. Nahson Morris and Eva Feld Curator Supervising Curator for the Jewish Museum DONORS TO THE EXHIBITION The exhibition is supported through the Samuel Brandt Fund, the David Berg Foundation, the Robert Lehman Foundation, the Centennial Fund, and the Peter Jay Sharp Exhibition Fund. The publication is made possible, in part, by The Malevich Society. Nonflash, noncommercial photography for personal use is permitted in this exhibition except where the following symbol appears: #ChagallLissitzkyMalevich Exhibition design: Leslie Gill Architect Graphic design: Topos Graphics Lighting: Clint R. Coller Intern: Paulina Fedotova Research Assistant: Ori Hashmonay The companion volume to the exhibition is on sale in the Cooper Shop in the museum’s lobby. -- 2 Chagall, Lissitzky, Malevich: The Russian Avant-Garde in Vitebsk, 1918–1922 Introduction “I found myself in Vitebsk when the great celebrations of the October Revolution were over, but the city was still resplendent with Malevich’s designs—circles, squares, dots, and lines of different colors—and with Chagall’s flying people. I had the impression of being in an enchanted city, but in those days everything was wonderful, and everything was possible, and at that moment the people of Vitebsk had become Suprematists.” Sofia Dymshits-Tolstaia, 1921 This is the first major exhibition to explore a littleknown chapter in the history of the Russian avant-garde: Marc Chagall’s encounter with the leading figures of abstraction, El (Lazar) Lissitzky and Kazimir Malevich, at the time of the Russian Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of El Lissitzky's Prouns a Thesis
    ARCHITECTURAL FORM GENERATION IN SUPREMATIST PAINTERLY SPACE: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF EL LISSITZKY’S PROUNS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY KEMAL REHA KAVAS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE IN ARCHITECTURE JANUARY 2005 Approval of the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Canan Özgen Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Architecture. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Selahattin Önür Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope of quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Architecture. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayşen Sava ş Supervisor Examining Committee Members Inst. Dr. Nihal Bursa (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ay şen Sava ş (METU, ARCH) Prof. Dr. Jale Erzen (METU, ARCH) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zeynep Mennan (METU, ARCH) Inst. Andreas Treske (Bilkent University, ARCH) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Kemal Reha Kavas ABSTRACT ARCHITECTURAL FORM GENERATION IN SUPREMATIST PAINTERLY SPACE: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF EL LISSITZKY’S PROUNS Kavas, Kemal Reha M.Arch, Department of Architecture Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ay şen Sava ş January, 2005, 120 pages This thesis re-conceptualizes Lazar Markovich (El) Lissitzky’s (1890-1941) PROUN drawings as architectural representations.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazimir Malevich, Unovis, and the Poetics of Materiality
    Chapter 5 Kazimir Malevich, Unovis, and the Poetics of Materiality Maria Kokkori, Alexander Bouras and Irina Karasik In 1921, Kazimir Malevich formulated a radically new understanding of ma- teriality and the nature of creativity. He stated, ‘The new war on materials has been declared. Materials will be defeated by the production processes, and in the course of this war they will be transformed’.1 From 1920 to 1922 at the Vitebsk People’s Art School (Vitebskoe narodnoe khudozhestvennoe uchilishche) and later at the State Institute for Artistic Culture in Petrograd (Gosudarstvennyi institut khudozhestvennoi kul’tury – Ginkhuk), Malevich and the Unovis group investigated art through laboratory research, focusing on the ‘science of painting’ [zhivopisnaia nauka], as Malevich described it, and examining the painterly processes involved in the ‘new systems of art’.2 Cen- tral to their explorations was the study of faktura, in both its material and immaterial aspects, fusing the two and thus challenging preconceptions about its meaning, practice, purpose, essence, and use.3 When Malevich set up Unovis (Utverditeli novogo iskusstva – Champions of the New Art) in early 1920 in Vitebsk, he deliberately set out to create a 1 Kazimir Malevich, ‘Unovis’, Iskusstvo, 1 (Vitebsk, 1921): 9-10. 2 K. Malevich, O novykh sistemakh v iskusstve. Statika i skorost’. Ustanovlenie A [On New Systems in Art. Stasis and Speed. Resolution A] (Vitebsk: Unovis, 1919); reprinted in Kazimir Malevich, Sobranie sochinenii v piati tomakh, ed. Aleksandra Shatskikh (Moscow: Gileia, 1995), I: 153-183; English translation in K. S. Malevich, Essays on Art 1915-1933, ed. Troels Andersen, trans. Xenia Glowacki-Prus and Arnold McMillin (Copenhagen: Borgens Forlag, 1968), 1: 83-119.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Art Exhibitions and State Identity in the Late Cold War
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Worlds on View: Visual Art Exhibitions and State Identity in the Late Cold War A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Art History, Theory, and Criticism by Nicole Murphy Holland Committee in charge: Professor John C. Welchman, Chair Professor Norman Bryson Professor Robert Edelman Professor Grant Kester Professor Kuiyi Shen 2010 © Nicole Murphy Holland, 2010 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Nicole Murphy Holland is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii This dissertation is dedicated to my beloved family, Lindsay, Emily, and Peter Holland, whose unswerving support and devotion has made this project possible. iv I didn’t know at the time that John Wayne was an American icon. I thought the painting was just another picture of a cowboy. Vladimir Mironenko, commenting on the painting John Wayne by Annette Lemieux. v Table of Contents Signature Page……………………………………………………………………… iii Dedication ……………………………………………………………………………iv Epigraph ………………………………………………………………………………v Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………… vi Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………… viii Vita…………………………………………………………………………………… x Abstract………………………………………………………………………………xii Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 Part 1: Theoretical Underpinnings………………………………………… 12 Part 2: Exhibition Functions……………………………………………… 18 Part 3: The Nature of Exhibition Space……………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Suprematism, the Invention of Russian Artist Kazimir Malevich, Was One of the Earliest and Most Radical Developments in Abstract Art
    SYNOPSIS: Suprematism, the invention of Russian artist Kazimir Malevich, was one of the earliest and most radical developments in abstract art. Its name derived from Malevich's belief that Suprematist art would be superior to all the art of the past, and that it would lead to the "supremacy of pure feeling or perception in the pictorial arts." Heavily influenced by avant-garde poets, and an emerging movement in literary criticism, Malevich derived his interest in flouting the rules of language, in defying reason. He believed that there were only delicate links between words or signs and the objects they denote, and from this he saw the possibilities for a totally abstract art. And just as the poets and literary critics were interested in what constituted literature, Malevich came to be intrigued by the search for art's barest essentials. It was a radical and experimental project which at times came close to a strange mysticism. Although the Communist authorities later attacked the movement, its influence was pervasive in Russia in the early 1920s, and it was important in shaping Constructivism, just as it has been in inspiring abstract art to this day. Key Ideas / Information • The Suprematists' interest in abstraction was fired by a search for the 'zero degree' of painting, the point beyond which the medium could not go without ceasing to be art. This encouraged the use of very simple motifs, since they best articulated the shape and flat surface of the canvases on which they were painted. (Ultimately, the square, circle, and cross became the group's favorite motifs.) It also encouraged many Suprematists to emphasize the surface texture of the paint on canvas, this texture being another essential quality of the medium of painting.
    [Show full text]