DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Partners: Forging the US-Japan Special Relationship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pacific Partners: Forging the US-Japan Special Relationship Pacific Partners: Forging the U.S.-Japan Special Relationship 太平洋のパートナー：アメリカと日本の特別な関係の構築 Arthur Herman December 2017 Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Research Report Pacific Partners: Forging the U.S.-Japan Special Relationship 太平洋のパートナー：アメリカと日本の特別な関係の構築 Arthur Herman Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute © 2017 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org Hudson is grateful for the support of the Smith Richardson Foundation in funding the research and completion of this report. ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. Hudson Institute 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20004 P: 202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Table of Contents Introduction （イントロダクション） 3 Part I: “Allies of a Kind”: The US-UK Special Relationship in 15 Retrospect（パート I：「同盟の一形態」：米英の特別な関係は過去どうだったの か） Part II: Understanding the US-Japan Special Relationship 54 (パート II：アメリカと日本の特別な関係についてはどうとらえられるか) Part III: How the US-Japan Special Relationship Can Change Asia 101 （パート III:アメリカと日本の特別な関係はアジアをどのように変えることができる か） Conclusion（結論） 136 About the Author and Acknowledgements （著者紹介と謝辞） 144 End Notes（脚注） 145 This page intentionally left blank (this text will be removed before publishing) Pacific Partners: Forging the US-Japan Special Relationship INTRODUCTION n a speech in Fulton, Missouri on March 6, 1946, Winston Churchill coined one of the Imost famous phrases in the history of foreign policy. “Neither the sure prevention of war, nor the continuous rise of world organization will be gained without what I have called the fraternal association of the English-speaking peoples. This means a special relationship between the British Commonwealth and Empire and the United States.” The historical record shows this was not Churchill’s first mention of the term “special relationship.” It surfaces in his correspondence as early as 1943. But the Fulton speech was the first public acknowledgment of a bilateral strategic alliance that would persist for the next seventy years—an alliance, one can forcefully argue, that won both World Wars I and II, and then kept the peace in Europe for four decades during the Cold War. By any measure that is an impressive, nearly seventy-year record. Yet Churchill’s use of the term was more than simply descriptive of the successful wartime alliance between the UK and US, which led to Germany’s defeat and which Churchill foresaw would be needed again to confront Soviet aggression in the postwar period. (The Fulton speech also coined another phrase of great significance for the future: the “iron curtain” that Churchill portrayed as having descended upon Eastern Europe thanks to Soviet occupation.) Churchill’s use of the term was also clearly prescriptive. The true purpose of his speech, given in the aftermath of World War II to an overwhelmingly American audience, was to lay out an ambitious agenda for both countries. This agenda would keep peace while constraining the twin threats the former British prime minister saw looming on the horizon: war and tyranny. “If the population of the English-speaking Commonwealths,” Churchill emphasized, “be added to that of the United States, with all that such co-operation implies in the air, on the sea, all over the globe and in science and in industry, and in moral force, there will be no quivering, precarious balance of power to offer its temptation to ambition or adventure.”1 There can be little doubt that Churchill’s prediction largely came true over the next seventy years. In 1950, four years after the Fulton speech, the US-UK special relationship (in which Churchill included Canada) became the foundation of NATO, the security organization that halted Soviet aggression in the Cold War and that still maintains the balance of power between East and West in today’s Putin era. In addition, security and defense cooperation between the US and Britain would reach levels unprecedented in modern history—levels that have persisted through the war on terror and will no doubt grow stronger in the wake of Brexit. No one can doubt, either, that the Anglo-American alliance is built on more than perceptions of long-term common interests. There is also a deep foundation that rests on a common history (the United States having been originally a British colony), a 3 Arthur Herman common language, and shared commitment to common values such as liberty under law, individual freedom, and liberal democracy. Therefore, while both countries have other security treaties and alliance partners, if the term “special” does not apply to the US-UK security relationship seventy years later, then it applies nowhere. Seventy years, as it happens, is almost exactly how long the US-Japan strategic alliance has persisted since World War II. As we will see, this alliance has served to keep peace in East Asia and served as a powerful check on regional aggressors and a potent conduit of economic, cultural, scientific, and political interchange between the two countries. That interchange has, arguably, drawn the two countries as close together as possible, given that they are separated by a 4000-mile-wide ocean and a singular lack of any common language, history, or cultural tradition. In the final analysis, neither has a stronger or more reliable ally in Asia and the Pacific Rim than the other—just as neither the UK nor the US has a stronger and more reliable ally than the other in Europe and the Atlantic Basin. So is there a US-Japan special relationship analogous to the one Churchill identified between the US and UK in 1946? And if not, why not? What ingredients are needed to raise the US-Japan alliance to that level? And what advantages, strategic or otherwise, would flow from raising the US-Japan alliance into that special relationship status? These are the three questions this monograph sets out to address. The operative assumption here is that such an alliance is both possible and desirable. It is also axiomatic that the future of the relationship is also the future of peace and stability in Asia, just as US-UK cooperation became the anchor of peace and stability in Europe through the Cold War and beyond. In addressing these questions, then, the first step is seeing what can be learned from the US-UK experience—or perhaps more properly, the UK-US experience since, as we will see, Britain was the original suitor in this trans-Atlantic partnership and has remained so since. It is Britain above all, and its political leaders, who have made preserving the alliance at its “special,” even unique level a major priority. After World War II the US steadily emerged as the stronger and more dominant partner. It has generally been conceded ever since that if either party would suffer more from the severing of the relationship, it would be Britain. Yet as we will see, the US has learned that it, too, enjoys additional leverage in world affairs by cultivating and extending the special relationship. While Churchill and other British politicians had no illusions and realized that Britain had more to gain in a strong postwar partnership, US politicians have also discovered that keeping the former colonial superpower and “mother of all parliaments” close has important benefits. So while Churchill, because of his prestige as a war leader and statesman, undoubtedly propelled the phrase special relationship into the political vocabulary in ways a less- regarded figure could not; and while historians still disagree about Churchill’s 4 Pacific Partners: Forging the US-Japan Special Relationship intentions in injecting the phrase into a speech ostensibly about postwar Europe, there is no doubt that the speech described an alliance that has continued to shape global reality and served as a foundation for regional peace and stability, regardless of how fanciful or cynical Churchill’s intentions may have been. The US-UK alliance has been unlike any other in modern history. Except perhaps, the alliance between the US and Japan. As we will see, that alliance has served as a foundation for regional peace and stability. It, too, has deep roots that are very different, yet at least as rooted in historical reality; and it, too, has benefited both partners in tangible and undeniable ways. Moreover, in the past seventy years it has suffered fewer major disruptions and confrontations over foreign policy goals than the British-American special relationship. While there were important disagreements between Tokyo and Washington over the Vietnam War, and there has been occasional friction over whether Japan has been carrying its share of the mutual defense burden and over US bases in Japan, there has not been a Japanese version of the Suez dispute or the public strain placed on the alliance like the strain on US-UK relations triggered by the Falklands crisis in 1982 (see part I). At the same time, it is certainly true that unlike the US and UK, the US and Japan do not share the same language or culture. It is also true that they do not share the same ethnic or racial stock, although as the US has become increasingly multi-racial since 1945, including 5.6 percent Asian-American,2 that distinction, which would have meant a great deal to Winston Churchill, has become virtually meaningless.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Japan Between the Wars
    JAPAN BETWEEN THE WARS The Meiji era was not followed by as neat and logical a periodi- zation. The Emperor Meiji (his era name was conflated with his person posthumously) symbolized the changes of his period so perfectly that at his death in July 1912 there was a clear sense that an era had come to an end. His successor, who was assigned the era name Taisho¯ (Great Righteousness), was never well, and demonstrated such embarrassing indications of mental illness that his son Hirohito succeeded him as regent in 1922 and re- mained in that office until his father’s death in 1926, when the era name was changed to Sho¯wa. The 1920s are often referred to as the “Taisho¯ period,” but the Taisho¯ emperor was in nominal charge only until 1922; he was unimportant in life and his death was irrelevant. Far better, then, to consider the quarter century between the Russo-Japanese War and the outbreak of the Manchurian Incident of 1931 as the next era of modern Japanese history. There is overlap at both ends, with Meiji and with the resur- gence of the military, but the years in question mark important developments in every aspect of Japanese life. They are also years of irony and paradox. Japan achieved success in joining the Great Powers and reached imperial status just as the territo- rial grabs that distinguished nineteenth-century imperialism came to an end, and its image changed with dramatic swiftness from that of newly founded empire to stubborn advocate of imperial privilege. Its military and naval might approached world standards just as those standards were about to change, and not long before the disaster of World War I produced revul- sion from armament and substituted enthusiasm for arms limi- tations.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures Taken by the Government of Japan on the Comfort Women Issue
    Fact Sheet: Measures Taken by the Government of Japan on the Comfort Women Issue 1. The Government of Japan has sincerely dealt with issues of reparations, property and claims pertaining to the Second World War under the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which the Government of Japan concluded with 45 countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom and France, and through other bilateral treaties, agreements and instruments. These issues including those of claims of individuals, have already been legally settled with the parties to these treaties, agreements and instruments. (With regard to the ROK, it was confirmed in the 1965 Agreement on the Settlement of Problems concerning Property and Claims and on Economic Cooperation between Japan and the Republic of Korea that the issues concerning property and claims “have been settled completely and finally.” The Government of Japan, in accordance with the said Agreement, provided 500 million US dollars to the ROK as economic cooperation.) 2. Additionally, since the 1990s, the Government of Japan has extended its utmost cooperation to the projects of the Asian Women’s Fund (AWF), which carried out “medical and welfare support projects” and provided “atonement money” (for a total of 5 million yen per person in the ROK and Taiwan as well as 3.2 million yen per person in the Philippines) to offer realistic relief to former comfort women. When the atonement money as well as the medical and welfare support were provided, the then-Prime Ministers (namely, PM Ryutaro Hashimoto, PM Keizo Obuchi, PM Yoshiro Mori and PM Junichiro Koizumi), sent a signed letter expressing apologies and remorse directly to each former comfort woman.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Reexaminating TERAUCHI Masatake's Character
    February 2019 Issue Reexaminating TERAUCHI Masatake's Character - As a “Statesman”- KANNO Naoki, Cheif, Military Archives, Center for Military History Introduction What comes to mind when you think of TERAUCHI Masatake (1852 - 1919)? For example, at the beginning of the Terauchi Cabinet (October 1616 - September 1918), it was ridiculed as being both anachronistic and a non-constitutional cabinet. Using NISHIHARA Kamezo, also known as Terauchi's private secretary, he provided funds of up to 110 million yen to the Duan Qirui government in northern China (the Nishihara Loans). The so-called Rice Riots broke out in his final year, and Siberian Intervention began. Terauchi was also called a protégé of YAMAGATA Aritomo, the leading authority on Army soldiers from former Choshu domain (Choshu-han). On the other hand, what about the succeeding Hara Cabinet (September 1918 - November 1921)? Exactly 100 years ago, HARA Takashi had already started the cabinet that consists of all political party members, except for the three Ministers of the Army, Navy, and Foreign Affairs. After the World War I, a full-on party politics was developed in Japan as global diplomatic trends drastically changed. Compared to Hara, Terauchi has not been evaluated. After Chinese-Japanese relations deteriorated following the Twenty-One Demands in 1915, the aforementioned Nishihara Loans, implemented for recovery, were over-extended to the only northern part of China, the Duan Qirui government only for a limited time. Then, ultimately, the Loans did not lead an improvement in relationships. Thus it can be said that, until recently, Terauchi's character has been almost entirely neglected by academia.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism in Japan's Contemporary Foreign Policy
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Nationalism in Japan’s Contemporary Foreign Policy: A Consideration of the Cases of China, North Korea, and India Maiko Kuroki A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, February 2013 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of <88,7630> words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Josh Collins and Greg Demmons. 2 of 3 Abstract Under the Koizumi and Abe administrations, the deterioration of the Japan-China relationship and growing tension between Japan and North Korea were often interpreted as being caused by the rise of nationalism. This thesis aims to explore this question by looking at Japan’s foreign policy in the region and uncovering how political actors manipulated the concept of nationalism in foreign policy discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Democracy in Japan: the Parliamentary Cabinet System Since 1868
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Kentucky University of Kentucky UKnowledge Asian Studies Race, Ethnicity, and Post-Colonial Studies 5-15-2014 Growing Democracy in Japan: The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868 Brian Woodall Georgia Institute of Technology Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Woodall, Brian, "Growing Democracy in Japan: The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868" (2014). Asian Studies. 4. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_asian_studies/4 Growing Democracy in Japan Growing Democracy in Japan The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868 Brian Woodall Due to variations in the technical specifications of different electronic reading devices, some elements of this ebook may not appear as they do in the print edition. Readers are encouraged to experiment with user settings for optimum results. Copyright © 2014 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Woodall, Brian.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 9 in the Post-Sunakawa World: Continuity and Deterrence Within a Transforming Global Context
    Washington International Law Journal Volume 26 Number 1 Special Issue on the Japanese Constitution 1-1-2017 Article 9 in the Post-Sunakawa World: Continuity and Deterrence Within a Transforming Global Context John O. Haley University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation John O. Haley, Article 9 in the Post-Sunakawa World: Continuity and Deterrence Within a Transforming Global Context, 26 Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2017). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol26/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington International Law Journal by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Compilation © 2016 Washington International Law Journal Association ARTICLE 9 IN THE POST-SUNAKAWA WORLD: CONTINUITY AND DETERRENCE WITHIN A TRANSFORMING GLOBAL CONTEXT John O. Haley∗ Abstract: The 1959 Supreme Court Grand Bench (en banc) decision in Sakata v. Japan1 (the Sunakawa case) was the first Supreme Court decision on Article 9 and the constitutionality of Japan's defense policies. In the precedent-setting decision, all fifteen justices endorsed the view that under Article 9 Japan retained a fundamental right of self-defense and could enter into treaties for mutual security. In the absence of an apparent or "clear" violation, the courts, Sunakawa held, must defer to the judgment of the political branches on the issue of constitutionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Yulia MIKHAILOVA: Curriculum Vitae Amd Publications
    Hiroshima Journal of International Studies Volume 19 2013 Professor Yulia MIKHAILOVA: Curriculum Vitae amd Publications Curriculum Vitae Date of Birth: February 23,1948 Nationality: Australia; Permanent Resident of Japan Educational Background 1966.09 − 1972.02 Leningrad State University, Faculty of Oriental Studies, Department of Far Eastern History Bachelor with Honors in Japanese History Thesis title: Liberal Ideas in Early Modern Japan 1972.11 -1976.11 Soviet (Russian) Academy of Science Institute of Oriental Studies, Ph.D. student Ph.D. in History, 19/09/1979 Dissertation title: The Movement for Freedom and Popular Rights in Japan: History and Ideology (1870s and 1880s) Employment Record 1972.02 – 1993.01 Junior Researcher, Researcher, Senior Researcher, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, Russia 1982.09 -1988.06 Part-time Lecturer, Faculty of Oriental Studies, Leningrad State University, Soviet Union 1993.02 – 1996.03 Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Asian and International Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia 1996.04 – 1998.03 Faculty of International Studies, Hiroshima City University, Japan, Associate Professor 1998.04 – 2013.03 Faculty of International Studies, Graduate School of International Studies, Hiroshima City University, Japan, Professor 2010.04 – present Osaka University, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Part-time Lecturer 2013.06—2013.07 Department of European History and Culture,Heidelberg University, Germany, Visiting Scholar Fellowships and Grants Received: Japan Foundation Fellowship, 1983, Topic of research: Motoori Norinaga: His Life and Ideas. Canon Foundation in Europe Fellowship, 1992-1993. Topic of research: The Interrelation Between Confucianism and Shinto in Tokugawa Japan. 148 Erwin-von-Baelz Guest Professorship, Tuebingen University, Germany, November 1992, lectures and workshops for students on Intellectual History of Tokugawa and Meiji Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • SNAPSHOTS Splash Day at Hippie Hollow'
    THIS VVEEK IN TEXA.S MAY 12-19,1989 COVER FEATURE Kim Corner ... A Dozen Roses for Mother's Day HIGHLIGHT Letter from Mom TVVT NEVVS Protests at Texas State Capitol VIEWPOINT Texas Insurance Problems Escalate SNAPSHOTS Splash Day at Hippie HolloW' f Santa Fe, New Mexico is renowned as an artist colony that is home to artisans, craftsmen, poets, sculptors, photographers, cabinetmakers, designers, intellectuals and people who love beauty. They are gifted, gentle and truly appreciate the esthetic qualities of life. Much the same, we hope to inspire Houston's large urban gay population with a new, exciting club specifically designed with them in mind; a showplace for them to enjoy and where their out-of-town guests can experience a taste of the Southwest ... Santa Fe style. Just in time for the summer of 1989, we proudly announce our GRAND OPENING MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND Watch for your invitation by mail, or ask your favorite bartender at any of the clubs at 800 Pacific in Houston. o 1419 RICHMOND • 528-8903 presenting a big month of top entertainment ° o· ---- ---~~------------.-------0-; 9PM SATURDAY, MAY 13 0 Miss Gay Houston At Large Pageant • emcee-Jill Jordan ---_ 0 0 • • 0 ---- _--.. --- ---------------SUNDAY, MAY 14 .---- A Special Mother's Day Tribute ____9PM SHOW:• 0 "UNINHIBITED" - --- ---- 0 ------.0 . ----.---o SATURDAY, -MAY-----20 •• --- The Return of The Whorehouse Girls ....------in "TROPICAL.... NIGHTS" 10PM --- 0 .' <rr-; --. _---- • • ----- -- --------SUNDAY, MAY 28°· ----- Memorial Weekend Holiday Show , -9PM SHOW: "UNINHIBITED"
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Turkish Relations: a Review at the Beginning of the Third Decade of the Post-Cold War
    U.S.-Turkish Relations a review at the beginning of the third decade of the post–cold war era 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Report Coordinators Bulent Aliriza Bulent Aras November 2012 ISBN 978-0-89206-759-6 Ë|xHSKITCy067596zv*:+:!:+:! Blank U.S.-Turkish Relations a review at the beginning of the third decade of the post–cold war era Report Coordinators Bulent Aliriza Bulent Aras November 2012 About CSIS—50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed practical solutions to the world’s greatest challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars continue to provide strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and de- velop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Since 1962, CSIS has been dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. After 50 years, CSIS has become one of the world’s pre- eminent international policy institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn has chaired the CSIS Board of Trustees since 1999. John J. Hamre became the Center’s president and chief executive officer in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL33436 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Updated October 5, 2006 Emma Chanlett-Avery (Coordinator) Analyst in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Mark E. Manyin Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division William H. Cooper Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Japan-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Summary The post-World War II U.S.-Japan alliance has long been an anchor of the U.S. security role in East Asia. The alliance, with its access to bases in Japan, where about 53,000 U.S. troops are stationed, facilitates the forward deployment of U.S. military forces in the Asia-Pacific, thereby undergirding U.S. national security strategy. For Japan, the alliance and the U.S. nuclear umbrella provide maneuvering room in dealing with its neighbors, particularly China and North Korea. The Bush Administration has made significant strides in its goals of broadening U.S.-Japan strategic cooperation and encouraging Japan to assume a more active international role. Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Japan made its first-ever military deployments in non-combat support of U.S. and allied forces in Afghanistan. In 2004 Tokyo sent non-combat troops to Iraq, despite considerable domestic opposition. Japan generally has supported the “hardline” U.S. position in the Six-Party Talks on North Korea’s nuclear program. In 2005 the U.S. and Japan announced a sweeping new agreement to strengthen military cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • {Download PDF} Britain, America, and the Special Relationship Since
    BRITAIN, AMERICA, AND THE SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP SINCE 1941 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK B J C McKercher | 9781138800007 | | | | | Britain, America, and the Special Relationship since 1941 1st edition PDF Book Bush came out of this encounter asking, "Why does she have any doubt that we feel this way on this issue? Eden, in poor health, was forced to retire. After the U. Live TV. Such a course would not be in the moral or economic interests of either of our countries. For other uses, see Special Relationship disambiguation. The Lebanon War also exposed some minor differences in attitudes over the Middle East. It was left to the Tories who took office in to cut back the rearmament program to 10 percent, though even this imposed an intolerable burden. The UK and US have a close and valuable relationship not only in terms of intelligence and security but also in terms of our profound and historic cultural and trading links and commitment to freedom, democracy and the rule of law. Americans can never forget how the very roots of our democratic political system and of our concepts of liberty and government are to be found in Britain. Illustrated with maps and photographs and supplemented by a chronology of events and list of key figures, this is an essential introductory resource for students of the political history and foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the twentieth century. We therefore here in Britain stand shoulder to shoulder with our American friends in this hour of tragedy, and we, like them, will not rest until this evil is driven from our world.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Policy Networks in Japan: Case of the Automobile Air Pollution Policies Takashi Sagara A thesis submitted to the Department of Geography and Environment of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy i UMI Number: U615939 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615939 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 "KSCSES p m r . rrti - S • - g r t W - • Declaration I, Takashi Sagara, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract The thesis seeks to examine whether the concept of the British policy network framework helps to explain policy change in Japan. For public policy studies in Japan, such an examination is significant because the framework has been rarely been used in analysis of Japanese policy. For public policy studies in Britain and elsewhere, such an examination would also bring benefits as it would help to answer the important question of whether it can be usefully applied in the other contexts.
    [Show full text]