DOCSLIB.ORG

Putney Place, 84-88 Upper Richmond Road in the London Borough of Wandsworth Planning Application No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Putney Place, 84-88 Upper Richmond Road in the London Borough of Wandsworth Planning Application No planning report PDU/1445a/02 17 November, 2008 Putney Place, 84-88 Upper Richmond Road in the London Borough of Wandsworth Planning application no. 2008/3321 Strategic planning application stage II referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal A detailed application for demolition of the existing office buildings and a redevelopment of the site to provide a residential-led mixed-use scheme comprising 300 residential units, 3,439 sq.m. of office space, 114 sq.m. of retail (Class A1) space, 443 sq.m. of flexible retail/restaurant/office (Classes A1, A3 and B1) space, 2,862 sq.m. of public amenity space, 32 car parking spaces, 213 sq.m. of cycle storage in excavated basement, associated plant and new public art, accommodated in two separate 26-storey (84m) and 21-storey (67.5m) buildings; and the erection of a single-storey building to contain 84 sq.m. of retail/cafe (Class A1/A3) space and landscaped public realm. The applicant The applicant is Oracle Residential Ltd and the architects are SMC Alsop. Strategic issues Wandsworth Council has resolved to refuse permission for this application. The Mayor must consider whether the application warrants a direction to take over determination of the application under Article 7 of the Mayor of London Order 2008. Having regard to the Council’s draft decision notice there are no sound planning reasons for the Mayor to intervene in this particular case and, therefore, no basis to issue a direction under Article 7 of the Order 2008. Recommendation That Wandsworth Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 16 September 2008, the Mayor of London received documents from Wandsworth Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. This was referred to the Mayor under Categories 1A, 1B(c), and 1C(c), of the Schedule to the Order 2008: 1A-”Development which comprises or includes the provision of more than 150 houses, flats, or page 1 houses and flats. ” 1B- “Development (other than development which only comprises the provision of houses, flats, or houses and flats) which comprises or includes the erection of a building or buildings— (c) outside Central London and with a total floorspace of more than 15,000 square metres.” 1C- “Development which comprises or includes the erection of a building of one or more of the following descriptions—(c) the building is more than 30 metres high and is outside the City of London.” 2 On 22 October 2008, the Mayor considered planning report PDU/1445a/01, and subsequently advised Wandsworth Council that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 110 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 111 of that report could address these deficiencies. 3 A copy of the above-mentioned report is attached. The essentials of the case with regard to the proposal, the site, case history, strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance are as set out therein, unless otherwise stated in this report. 4 On 6 November 2008, Wandsworth Council resolved to refuse planning permission for the development, and on 10 November 2008 it advised the Mayor of this decision. Under the provisions of Article 5 of the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor may allow the draft decision to proceed unchanged, or issue a direction under Article 7 that he is to act as the local planning authority for the purpose of determining the application and any connected application. The Mayor has until 23 November 2008 to notify the Council of his decision and to issue any direction. 5 The Council’s draft decision notice includes the following five reasons for refusal: i) The proposal would create an overbearing and incongruous form of development of inappropriate form, size, height, design, materials and appearance- out of character with the built form of the surrounding area, and of an inappropriate layout and design which would be to the detriment of visual amenity, to the detriment of the amenity of users of the development, and would form an overdevelopment of the site with inappropriate environmental conditions, to the detriment of the area and surrounding infrastructure, with insufficient benefits to the quality of the townscape, the quality of the public realm and funding contributions toward off-site improvements- contrary to UDP policies GEN7,TBE1, TBE2, TBE4,TBE5 and T1, and the Core Strategy Proposed Submission policies PL4, PL14 and IS3. ii) The proposal by reason of its height, layout and proximity to residential properties, would form an overbearing and dominant feature, having adverse impact on the amenity of adjoining occupiers, contrary to UDP policies GEN12 and H3, and Core Strategy Proposed Submission Policy PL6. iii) The loss of office space, which would lead to the loss of employment accommodation within the town centre and which is not considered adequately justified, has been put forward to take a contrary approach to UDP policy BIN3 and Core Strategy Proposed Submission Policies PL6, PL8, and PL14. iv) The proposal comprises below standard proportion affordable housing and an inappropriate split between shared ownership and social rented accommodation with no justification, contrary to the requirements of GEN 13, Core Strategy Proposed Submission policy IS5 and London Plan policy 3A.9. page 2 v) The proposal fails to provide satisfactory information to demonstrate acceptable levels of energy efficiency, measures to minimise environmental impact and to ensure an optimum sustainable form of development in accordance with the requirements of UDP policy GEN1 and Core Strategy Proposed Submission policy IS2. 6 The environmental information for the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 has been taken into account in the consideration of this case. 7 The decision on this case, and the reasons will be made available on the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk. Article 7: Direction that the Mayor is to be the local planning authority Policy test guidance Circular GOL Circular 1/2008 8 The initial policy test regarding the Mayor’s power to take over and determine applications referred under parts 1 and 2 of the schedule to the Order is a decision about who should have jurisdiction over the application rather than whether planning permission should ultimately be granted or refused. 9 The policy test consists of the following three parts, all of which must usually be met in order for the Mayor to take over the application: a) significant impact on the implementation of the London Plan; b) significant effects on one or more borough (except applications under Category 1A); and c) sound planning reasons for his intervention. 10 Parts (a) and (b) of the test identify the impact an application would have on the Mayor’s policies and the geographical extent of the impact, whilst part (c) deals with the reasons for the Mayor’s intervention, having regard to the Council’s draft decision on the application. These tests are intended to ensure that the Mayor can only intervene in the most important cases. 11 This report considers the extent to which the policy tests under Article 7(1) apply in this case and whether, therefore, the Mayor should direct that he is to be the local planning authority and apply the tests set out under Article 7(3) of the Order 2008. Policy test 7(1)(c): Sound planning reasons for intervening 12 Notwithstanding parts (a) and (b), part (c) of the policy test is whether the Mayor considers there to be sound planning reasons to intervene. Having regard to the details of the proposal and the Council’s draft reasons for refusal, together with the outstanding issues from stage one described in paragraphs 14 to 22 below, there are no sound planning reasons to intervene in this case. 13 In order for the Mayor to issue a direction that he is to be the local planning authority, relevant policy tests a) and c) must be met. Given policy test (c) has not been met, there is no basis to issue a direction under Article 7. 14 Notwithstanding the above, should the scheme be considered at appeal or a revised application submitted the applicant should have regard to the following matters considered below. • The submission of a housing toolkit appraisal to assess the financial viability of the scheme and to justify the low provision of affordable housing. page 3 • Confirmation as to whether a registered social landlord has been secured, how the proposed sheltered housing would be managed, whether a housing grant has been sought and if not, the reasons for that stance. • Confirmation of firm proposals to meet the shortfall in children’s playspace required as part of this development. • Further discussions with GLA officers, the Council and the applicant on the scale and design of the tower buildings. • Addressing the energy issues raised in paragraphs 44 to 57 of the attached planning report. • The submission of a noise assessment report to address the issues raised in paragraphs 70 to 75 of the attached report report. • The submission of further details in respect of the access provisions for disabled people (e.g. secure storage or charging facilities for residents who use a mobility scooter, and the provisions made for people with sensory impairments) as described in paragraphs 76-82 of the attached report.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wadham Road Planning Statement
    Property Development Business Plan – Town Planning Overview 1. PROPERTY DETAILS Site Name & Yard on Wadham Road, Putney, Address London SW15 2LR Unique Ref 279 (PAR) Borough London Borough of Wandsworth Company LUL Freehold Site Area 0.02 hectares (hectares) Location and Site Plan The site comprises a square area of concreted brownfield land. The site is adjacent to a railway viaduct which connects the two LU stations: Putney Bridge and East Putney. The site is located on Wadham Road within a predominantly residential area consisting of two to three storey Site terraced houses. Description East Putney tube station and Putney Railway station, which is served by South Western Railway, are both situated approximately 0.4 miles from the site. To the west of the site, separated by the railway viaduct, is an MOT servicing station on Winthorpe Road. Existing Use Temporary storage units now disused and vacant. 2. TOWN PLANNING Development Adopted: London Plan (2016), Emerging: Draft London Plan (intend to publish) 2020. Plan and supplementary Adopted: Wandsworth Local Plan Core Strategy (2016), Development Management Policies Document documents (2016) Site Allocation No Planning No available planning history for the site History Housing No zone/OA Heritage The site is within the Oxford Road Conservation Area Designations Flood Zone Flood zone 1 Ecological No Property Development Business Plan – Town Planning Overview Designations PTAL 6a Wandsworth core strategy: Table 2.1 identifies that the site is located in borough zone d and the Tall buildings erection of tall buildings is likely to be deemed inappropriate. The borough considers any development of permitted 5 storeys and above as ‘tall’ (assuming an average storey height of 3m).
    [Show full text]
  • Call Sign May 09
    May 2009 Sam’sSam’s donedone it!it! Driver’sDriver’s sonson qualifiesqualifies toto fightfight forfor England…England… OlOlympicsympics next???next??? A 23 year old DaC lady shows Nobu the wayway a real taxi service should operate!operate ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: DaC’s Barrie defeats Westminster in landmark PCN victory! Parliament Sq demo: DaC’s Roman Way manager (and Tamil) explains all… Call Sign May 2009 Page 2 NASH’S NUMBERS By Alan Nash (A95) Requested by numerous drivers, this is my best effort for the location of Heathrow hotels… Abbreviations - BRE - Bath Road exit via West Ramp, one-way to Newbury Road onto Bath Road A4… CLRB - Cherry Lane roundabout, leave by Spur Rd, straight on and under at M4 roundabout to... TR - Turn right / TL- Turn left / NS North side of road / SS South side of road / RB – Roundabout… * Star rating - Mid wk is approx cost per room per night mid week 04/2009 (weekends cheaper)… For ‘What’s On’ and a larger coloured version of the above, visit www.nashsnumbers.co.uk/extras Call Sign May 2009 Page 3 from the editor’s desk But in general, it is true that many cyclists do New marshalled shoot along the inside just as you are turning left. Some travel so quickly that you just don’t realise rank… why? they are there. In fact, some cyclists now travel I think that the more marshalled ranks we have, so fast that unless you have an open road, you the better. However, this issue of Call Sign tells can’t keep up with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Consultation
    Roehampton Supplementary Planning Document Statement of Consultation September 2015 Roehampton SPD Statement of Consultation - September 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Consultation Undertaken 4 3 Overview of Responses 6 4 Representations and the Council’s Response 8 Comments on the Introduction and Background 8 Comments on Key Issues and Challenges 8 Comments on Vision and Strategic Objectives 9 Comments on Core Principle 1 - Housing 9 Comments on Core Principle 2 - Services and Local Centres 12 Comments on Core Principle 3 - Community Facilities 13 Comments on Core Principle 4 - Landscape and Recreation 14 Comments on Core Principle 5 - Heritage 14 Comments on Core Principle 6 - Urban Design 16 Comments on Core Principle 7 - Transport and Access 16 Comments on Core Principle 8 - Sustainability 17 Comments on Delivery 19 Other Comments 19 Appendices 21 1 Consultation Letters 21 2 List of Consultees 22 3 Consultation Web pages 34 4 SPD Summary Boards 37 5 Consultation Advertisement 38 6 E-News Advertisements 39 7 Social Media Advertising 40 8 Consultation Representations 41 2 Wandsworth Council Introduction Local planning authorities may prepare Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) to provide greater detail on Local Plan policies. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) supports the production of SPDs where they can help applicants to make successful applications. To support the implementation of the Council’s Core Strategy (October 2010, second submission version October 2014), Development Management Policies Document (DMPD) (February 2012, second submission version October 2014), Site Specific Allocations Document (SSAD) (February 2012, second submission version October 2014) and the current Local Plan Review, the council is committed to preparing a number of SPDs, which are detailed in the Local Development Scheme (LDS) (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • 203A Lower Richmond Road, London, SW15 1HJ
    To Let 203A Lower Richmond Road, London, SW15 1HJ SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF ACCOMMODATION • Retail shop to let in Richmond The following breakdown indicates the area’s and • Ground floor lock up dimensions of the unit: • No restrictions on opening hours AREA AREA • Licence to serve alcohol from 10am to 9pm 7 days FLOOR DESCRIPTION sqm sqft a week • Rent £11,000 per annuum Ground Retail area 31.91 343.4 • Approx. 343 sqft of total area Total 31.91 343.4 • A1 Class use LOCATION DESCRIPTION The shop is situated on the South side of Lower Richmond Road between Erpingham Road and Fanthorpe Street Vacant retail shop to let. The property is situated within a within the London Borough of Wandsworth. Lower parade of shops which include a Dentist, Dry cleaners and Richmond Road is a main arterial route between Putney Pizzeria. The property has a frontage to Lower Richmond and Barnes. The premises are a short walking distance to Road of circa 13sqft. Putney Railway Station. There are several bus routes that pass along the premises. Monarch House, 8 Church Street, Isleworth, Middlesex, TW7 6XB www.monarchcommercial.co.uk To Let TENURE Rental £11,000 BUSINESS RATES Rateable value £10,000 Rates payable £4,600 Interested parties are advised to confirm the rating liability with the Local Authority on; 020 8871 6000. EPC VIEWING AND FURTHER INFORMATION Interested parties are invited to contact the vendor’s sole Certificate available upon request agents, Monarch Commercial, to arrange a viewing: VAT Ankur Lakhanpal 0208 569 8500 To be confirmed E-mail: [email protected] LEGAL COSTS Raj Sandhu 0208 569 8500 Each party to be responsible for their own legal costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking-Tube-Map-Zones-1-3.Pdf
    Walking times between stations Bounds Green Bowes Park 23 17 White Hart Lane Wood Green 18 Northumberland Park Alexandra Palace 15 Bruce Grove East Finchley 22 Turnpike Lane Hornsey 19 25 23 22 Harringay South 28 Hendon Central Highgate Crouch Harringay Green Lanes Tottenham 19 3 25 Hill Blackhorse 23 31 35 Road Brent Cross Archway Manor 19 Walthamstow 19 21 19 House Seven Tottenham 18 24 Central Golders Green Sisters Hale Cricklewood Hampstead 12 Upper 15 23 Leytonstone Neasden 27 Heath Gospel Oak 28 13 16 Holloway 38 13 Stamford Walthamstow 16 Hampstead Tufnell Park Hill Manor Park Dollis Hill 10 10 Queen’s Road Leyton 3 Wanstead 17 16 Midland Road 23 Finsbury Park 67 27 Park 24 17 16 Kentish Town Willesden Green 21 Arsenal 55 13 20 Leytonstone 26 59 20 Stoke Newington St James Street 16 28 Finchley Road Kentish 20 High Road Forest Gate Stonebridge Park Town Holloway Road Kilburn & Frognal 13 Rectory Road 17 42 Leyton Belsize Park West 29 Lea Bridge 16 33 Woodgrange 23 Camden 10 14 Drayton Park Harlesden 16 Road Caledonian Road Clapton 19 15 Park 12 Highbury & Dalston Stratford Maryland Kensal Brondesbury West 55 Chalk Farm Kingsland 52 11 Willesden Junction Rise Park 12 25 13 Islington 20 International 14 24 12 12 8 Hampstead 13 Hackney 32 25 Camden Town Caledonian 13 15 Downs 20 Brondesbury 10 Homerton Finchley Road 2 Road & 18 14 19 29 Kensal Green 8 Barnsbury Canonbury Stratford 18 18 7 27 Hackney Swiss Cottage Mornington St Hackney Queen’s Park Crescent King’s Dalston Junction 16 Central Wick 7 Kilburn Pancras 14 International Cross
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 3
    Agenda Item!""#$%&'() 3 Page 1 Page 2 !""#$%&'() Page 3 This page is intentionally left blank Page 4 Appendix 2 LondonAssembly(Plenary)ExtraordinaryMeeting–3September2013 TranscriptofAgendaItem4:RevisedEarlyMinorAlterationstotheLondonPlan DarrenJohnson(Chair): Thepurposeoftoday’smeetingisfortheAssemblytoformally receiveand,inaccordancewithsection42BoftheGreaterLondonAuthority(GLA)Act1999 (asamended),consideritsresponsetotheRevisedEarlyMinorAlterations(REMA)tothe LondonPlan. CanIthereforewelcometotoday’smeetingourguestsfromtheGLA:SirEdwardLister,Deputy MayorforPlanning;RichardBlakeway,DeputyMayorforHousing,LandandProperty;Stewart Murray,AssistantDirectorofPlanningandRichardLinton,PrincipalStrategicPlanner. MyopeningquestiontoSirEdward:couldyousetouttheaimsandobjectivesoftheRevised EarlyMinorAlterationstotheLondonPlan,aslaidbeforetheAssembly,andhowthealterations addresstheissuesraisedbytheInspector,theAssemblyandthechangestonationalpolicy. SirEdwardLister(DeputyMayorforPlanning): Thankyou,Darren.BeforeIdocouldI justalsointroduceJenniferPeterswhoisaseniorstrategicplannerwithintheteam.Depending uponthequestion,wemightwanttoswaponeofthepeoplehereonthefrontbench,soto speak,withher.Itdependsuponthelineofquestioningandhowitgoes.Ihopethatis acceptabletoyou. Toansweryourquestions:firstly,theaimsandobjectivesofREMA.Theearlyalterationstothe planarereallyunfinishedbusinessfromtheLondonPlanpublishedin2011andtheyintended todothreethings.Firstly,tobringtheplanintoconformitywiththeNationalPlanningPolicy Framework(NPPF)and,asyouwillseeinaminuteorIhopeyouwill,itislargelyinconformity
    [Show full text]
  • Flat 4 25 Weimar Street
    WEIMAR STREET PUTNEY • SW15 WEIMAR STREET PUTNEY • SW15 A superb brand new, second floor high specification two bedroom apartment. Situated in a prime location close to local amenities with excellent transport links. 2 double bedrooms • Bathroom Open plan kitchen/reception room New build • Central Putney location Putney Station 0.3 miles Putney Bridge Station 0.3 miles Putney Common 0.7 miles Wandsworth Park 0.4 miles Richmond Park 2.5 miles Central London 6.3 miles Heathrow Airport 13.4 miles Gatwick Airport 29.4 miles ﴿All distances are approximate﴾ These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the text. Weimar Street, Putney SW15 25 Weimar street SW15 is a new development located in the heart of Putney which is made up of six two bedroom apartments. Finished to a high standard throughout, James Taylor Construction Ltd have designed a selection of superb apartments, with open plan living/dining rooms and well appointed bedrooms. Location The apartment is conveniently located moments from Putney High Street, which offers a wonderful array of bars, local shops, restaurants, cafes and supermarkets. The area benefits from numerous excellent schools and the open spaces of Wandsworth Park, Putney Common and Richmond Park. Putney train station and Putney Bridge underground station offer quick access into the City and the West End. There are numerous buses which run from Putney High Street into central London, Richmond, Wimbledon and surrounding areas. The A3 is a short drive away, providing a swift exit to most parts of the South coast and the surrounding countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Rail
    A B C D E F G H Towards Towards Towards Towards Towards Towards Aylesbury Hemel Hempstead Luton Stevenage Stevenage Stansted Airport Luton Airport Parkway Outside fare zones, Welwyn Garden City Hertford North Hertford East St Margarets London’s Outside fare zones Watford Junction Oyster not valid. Hatfield Bayford Harpenden Welham Green Ware Chesham 9 St Albans City Brookmans Park Cuffley Outside fare zones Rye Amersham Potters Bar House Watford High Street Radlett Hadley Wood Crews Hill Rail & Tube 6 Broxbourne Cockfosters Gordon Hill Bushey Elstree & Borehamwood New Barnet Chalfont & 8 Enfield Chase Cheshunt Epping Latimer Watford Oakwood 7 8 High Barnet Towards 5 Grange Park Theydon Bois Chelmsford services Carpenders Park Theobalds Waltham Outside Oakleigh Park Grove 6 7 8 and Southend Towards Chorleywood Southgate Cross Debden fare Croxley Totteridge & Whetstone Enfield High 7 Winchmore Hill Town zones Turkey Loughton Wycombe Rickmansworth Street Hatch End Edgware Woodside Park Arnos Grove Shenfield New Southgate Enfield Lock Moor Park Palmers Green Southbury Buckhurst Hill Stanmore Mill Hill Broadway West Finchley Bounds Bush Hill Brentwood 1 1 6 Headstone Lane Green Park Brimsdown Chingford Northwood Roding 5 West Ruislip Burnt Oak 4 Mill Hill East Valley Grange Hill Canons Park Ponders End Northwood Bowes Park Hills Harrow & Wealdstone Colindale Chigwell Finchley Central Edmonton Green Highams Hainault Hillingdon Ruislip Harold Wood Queensbury Hendon Central Alexandra Wood Green Meridian Water Park Pinner 5 Woodford Ruislip Manor
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 2 Urban Design Study: Tall Buildings Submission Version
    Stage 2 Urban Design Study: Tall Buildings Submission version LDF evidence base May 2011 Wandsworth Stage 2 Urban Design Study – Tall Buildings Stage 2 Urban Design Study - Tall Buildings 1 Introduction 4 Background 4 Areas for further analysis 6 Methodology 7 2 Detailed Area Studies 8 Wandsworth Town Centre 8 Policy Context 8 Urban Characterisation 10 Transport 14 Development opportunities 14 Findings and policy recommendations 14 Clapham Junction Town Centre 18 Policy Context 18 Urban Characterisation 19 Transport 24 Development opportunities 24 Findings and policy recommendations 26 Putney Town Centre and Putney Wharf Focal Point 28 Policy Context 28 Urban Characterisation 29 Transport 33 Development opportunities 33 Findings and policy recommendations 34 Balham Town Centre 36 Policy Context 36 Wandsworth Stage 2 Urban Design Study – Tall Buildings Urban Characterisation 36 Transport 40 Development opportunities 40 Findings and policy recommendations 40 Tooting Town Centre 42 Policy Context 42 Urban Characterisation 42 Transport 46 Development opportunities 46 Findings and policy recommendations 46 Nine Elms near Vauxhall 48 Policy Context 48 Urban Characterisation 48 Transport 52 Development opportunities 52 Findings and policy recommendations 53 Wandsworth Riverside Quarter Focal Point and Wandle Delta Proposed Focal Point 55 Policy Context 55 Urban Characterisation 55 Transport 59 Development opportunities 59 Findings and policy recommendations 59 Ransomes Dock Focal Point 61 Policy Context 61 Urban Characterisation 61 Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Estimates of Station Usage 2017/18: Methodology and Validation
    Report December 2018 Estimates of Station Usage 2017/18: Methodology and Validation Office of Rail and Road Our ref: 23285201 Client ref: Report December 2018 Estimates of Station Usage 2017/18: Methodology and Validation Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Office of Rail and Road 28-32 Upper Ground 3rd Floor London SE1 9PD One Kemble Street WC2B 4AN +44 20 7910 5000 Client ref: www.steergroup.com Our ref: 23285201 Steer has prepared this material for Office of Rail and Road. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Estimates of Station Usage 2017/18: Methodology and Validation | Report Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. i Introduction ......................................................................................................................... i Methodology ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Passenger Flows on London's Public Transport Network
    Intermodal Passenger Flows on London’s Public Transport Network Automated Inference of Full Passenger Journeys Using Fare-Transaction and Vehicle-Location Data by Jason B. Gordon B.A., University of California, Berkeley Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Transportation and Master in City Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2012 © 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author . Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of Urban Studies and Planning August 10, 2012 Certified by . Nigel H.M. Wilson Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Certified by . Harilaos Koutsopoulos Professor of Transport Science, Royal Institute of Technology Thesis Supervisor Certified by . John P. Attanucci Lecturer & Research Associate, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Alan Berger Professor of Urban Studies and Planning Chair, Master in City Planning Committee Accepted by . Heidi M. Nepf Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chair, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students Intermodal Passenger Flows on London’s Public Transport Network Automated Inference of Full Passenger Journeys Using Fare-Transaction and Vehicle-Location Data by Jason B. Gordon Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on August 10, 2012 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Transportation and Master in City Planning AbstrAct Urban public transport providers have historically planned and managed their networks and services with limited knowledge of their customers’ travel pat- terns.
    [Show full text]
  • London's Rail & Tube Services
    Rail & Tube QR 1-2016 v12 02/12/2015 11:09 Page 1 London’s Rail & Tube services tfl.gov.uk nationalrail.co.uk A B C D E F G H Towards Towards Towards Towards Towards Key to lines and symbols Hemel Hempstead Luton Airport Parkway Welwyn Garden City Hertford North Towards Stansted Airport Aylesbury Bakerloo Abellio Greater Anglia ZONE Hertford East Watford Junction Ware Central Chiltern Railways 9 Circle St. Margarets c2c ZONE limited service Watford High Street District Gatwick Express Amersham Chesham ZONE ZONE ZONE Elstree & Borehamwood Hadley Wood Crews Hill Rye House 6 Broxbourne Hammersmith & City Great Northern 8 Bushey 7 6 ZONE ZONE ZONE Jubilee Great Western Railway Gordon Hill Cheshunt Metropolitan Heathrow Connect ZONE Epping New Barnet Cockfosters 7 8 7 Carpenders Park Northern Heathrow Express Enfield Chase 7 High Barnet Theydon Bois Watford ZONE Theobalds Piccadilly London Midland Grove Chalfont Oakwood limited service Grange Park Waltham Cross Debden ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE Victoria Southern & Latimer 5 Turkey Croxley limited service Hatch End Totteridge & Whetstone Enfield Street Waterloo & City Southeastern Towards Southgate Town Loughton 6 7 8 9 1 Chorleywood Oakleigh Park Enfield Lock 1 Docklands Light Railway Southeastern high speed High Winchmore Hill Southbury Towards Wycombe Rickmansworth Moor Park Woodside Park Arnos Grove Chelmsford London Overground South West Trains Buckhurst Hill ZONE and Southend Headstone Lane Edgware Palmers Green Bush Hill Brimsdown London Trams Thameslink limited service Park Chingford Northwood
    [Show full text]