Ciputra Development Bloomberg: CTRA.IJ | Reuters: CTRA.JK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ciputra Development Bloomberg: CTRA.IJ | Reuters: CTRA.JK Company Update Ciputra Development Bloomberg: CTRA.IJ | Reuters: CTRA.JK Samuel Research 01 Nopember 2017 Inline 9M17 weak 3Q17 BUY (Maintain) Perbaikan sektor yang masih belum terlihat dan rendahnya pengakuan pendapatan di 3Q17 serta stagnasi pertumbuhan segmen rumah hunian Target Price Rp 1,580 dan rulo telah mendorong stagnasi kinerja keuangan CTRA di 9M17. Last Price Rp 1,205 Kenaikan segmen recurring yang hanya +6.5%YoY juga tidak dapat banyak menolong lonjakan beban lain-lain (179%YoY) yang telah ikut Potential Upside 31.1% menekan laba bersih 9M17 turun -8.4%YoY. Sudut pandang kami untuk JCI Index 6,017 CTRA tahun depan masih positif (lihat report SSI sebelumnya). Review yang tengah kami lakukan tidak akan menurunkan TP maupun Share isued (mn) 18.56 rekomendasi. Tetap BUY CTRA dengan TP NAV Rp1.580 (50% disc to Market Cap. (Rp bn) 22.37 NAV), 23.1x P/E17E dan 2.0x PBV17E. 52-Weeks High/Low 1,700 / 990 Rendahnya kinerja 9M17. CTRA melaporkan penurunan pendapatan dan laba sebesar -1.6%YoY dan -8.4%YoY, sedangkan per 3Q17 lonjakan laba Avg Daily Vol (mn) 16.79 bersih QoQ belum kami simpulkan sebagai sinyal perbaikan stabil kinerja Free Float 49.0 tahun depan. Di sisi lain, angka 9M17A dapat dikatakan inline vs proyeksi pendapatan kami untuk CTRA di 9M17E, atau mencapai 96.3% dan laba Nominal Value Rp 250 bersih +0.8% lebih baik (Rp566miliar 9M17A vs Rp562miliar 9M17E SSI). Book value/share ‘17 Rp 774 Adapun 3Q17A hanya mencapai 83.1% dan 81.7% vs 3Q17E kami. Relative to JCI Chart Stagnasi main revenue contributor. Di periode yang sama unit bisnis 140 JCI CTRA penyumbang utama pendapatan konsolidasian (rumah hunian dan ruko) 130 tercatat stagnan menjadi Rp2.31tn vs Rp2.44tn di 9M16, dengan total 120 110 penjualan unit usaha non-recurring menjadi Rp3.14tn dan tidak banyak 100 berubah dari Rp3.28tn 9M16. Demikian pula dengan segmen recurring yang 90 meskipun bertumbuh +6.5%YoY tidak dapat banyak mengimbangi stagnasi 80 bisnis non-recurring. 70 Nov-16 Feb-17 May-17 Aug-17 Nov-17 Ekspektasi meningkatknya pengakuan pendapatan. Sepanjang Jan- Sept17, CTRA membukukan pre-sales +21.5%YoY menjadi Rp5.25tn. Pengakuan pendapatan yang lebih banyak di kuaryal berjalan dibarengi Company Background dengan pertumbuhan recurring yang lebih baik dan stabilnya kenaikan pre- PT Ciputra Development Tbk merupakan sales tahun depan menjadi beberapa katalis pertumbuhan FY18. Marketing pengembang dan penjual landed house, sales 9M17 mencapai 61.8% dari target CTRA dan 62.2% dibandingkan apartement, ruang perkantoran dan dengan estimasi FY17E kami (Rp8.43tn), inline vs 60.1% tahun lalu. properti lainnya. CTRA juga mengembangkan berbagai fasilitas yang Maintain BUY. Kontinuitas suku bunga yang rendah potensi meningkatkan berhubungan dengan properti. catatan penjualan segmen residential dan shophouses sebagai akibat Shareholder Structure peningkatan profile konsumen menggunakan mortgage (51% di 9M17, 49% di FY16 dan jauh diatas FY15 29%). Beberapa resiko investasi : (1) PT Sang Pelopor 44.8% pelemahan sektor berlanjut (2) nilai pre sales turun. Credit Suiise Group 6.2% Forecast and Valuation (at closing price Rp1,205 per share) Others 49.0% Y/E Dec (Rpbn) 15A 16A 17E 18E Sales 7,514 6,739 6,896 7,928 EBITDA 2,528 1,990 2,228 2,308 Net Profit 1,739 1,171 1,271 1,447 EPS (Rp/saham) 94 63 68 78 Akhmad Nurcahyadi, CSA DPS (Rp) 15 39 50 68 +62 21 2854 8144 Dividend Yield (%) 1.3 3.2 4.1 5.6 [email protected] BV per share (Rp) 703 770 774 807 EV/EBITDA (x) 14.6 11.1 8.7 6.1 P/E Ratio (x) 12.9 19.1 17.6 15.5 P/BV Ratio (x) 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 www.samuel.co.id Page 1 of 5 Ciputra Development CTRA:IJ | CTRA.JK Figure 1. CTRA Quarterly Result 3Q16 2Q17 3Q17 QoQ YoY 9M16 9M17 YoYvs vsFY16 FY17Evs FY17ESSI cons Sales 1.540 1.555 1.522 (2,1) (1,2) 4.419 4.348 (1,6) 65,6 63,1 56,5 COGS (812) (756) (844) 11,6 3,9 (2.280) (2.267) (0,6) Gross profit 728 799 678 (15,2) (6,9) 2.139 2.081 (2,7) S&GA and others (285) (498) (252) (49,4) (11,6) (1.060) (1.066) 0,5 Operating profit 443 302 426 41,3 (3,8) 1.078 1.016 (5,8) Net Interest expense (121) (72) (92) 27,4 (23,9) (270) (248) (8,1) Other income (expenses) 103 (34) (6) (82,9) (105,6) 90 57 (37,3) Pre-tax profit 426 196 328 67,8 (22,8) 898 824 (8,3) Profit (loss) for the period 329 141 256 82,0 (22,2) 668 625 (6,5) Owners of the parent 308 123 227 84,1 (26,5) 618 566 (8,4) 71,2 60,4 46,3 Margin Gross margin 47,3 51,4 44,5 (6,8) (2,7) 48,4 47,9 (0,5) - (47,9) Operating margin 28,8 19,4 28,0 8,6 (0,8) 24,4 23,4 (1,0) - (23,4) Net margin 20,0 7,9 14,9 7,0 (5,1) 14,0 13,0 (1,0) 95,8 82,8 Source: Company, SSI research Figure 2. CTRA and peers Stock Rec Mkt Cap Last Price 1D Chg YTD Chg TP Cons TP SSI Upside PE PE PBV PBV ROE ROE Coverage (Rpbn) (Rp) (%) (%) (Rp) (Rp) (%) 17E 18E 17E 18E 17E 18E BSDE BUY 33,201 1,725 0.3 (1.7) 2,267 2,350 36.23 15.4 13.3 1.3 1.1 8.7% 8.5% PWON BUY 30,581 635 0.8 12.4 723 767 20.79 15.5 13.0 3.0 2.5 19.2% 19.3% ASRI BUY 7,899 402 (1.0) 14.2 442 448 11.44 14.9 14.4 1.0 0.9 6.7% 6.6% SMRA HOLD 14,643 1,015 (1.9) (23.4) 1,254 1,110 9.36 44.9 33.6 1.8 1.9 4.1% 5.7% SSIA BUY 2,800 595 0.8 37.1 796 750 26.05 39.7 22.9 0.9 0.9 2.3% 3.8% CTRA BUY 22,365 1,205 (0.4) (9.7) 1,469 1,580 31.12 17.7 15.4 1.6 1.5 8.8% 9.7% DMAS BUY 9,013 187 (1.1) (19.1) 283 300 60.43 10.6 8.5 1.0 0.9 9.7% 10.8% KIJA BUY 6,289 302 (0.7) 4.2 446 450 49.01 13.1 11.6 1.0 0.9 7.8% 8.1% Average 21.5 16.6 1.5 1.3 8.4% 9.0% Source: Company, SSI research Figure 3. CTRA PE Band 30 25 20 15 10 5 Nov-11 Nov-12 Nov-13 Nov-14 Nov-15 Nov-16 Nov-17 Average ST dev +1 ST dev -1 PE - Forward ST dev +2 ST dev -2 Source: Bloomberg, SSI research www.samuel.co.id Page 2 of 5 Ciputra Development CTRA:IJ | CTRA.JK Figure 4. CTRA NAV Valuation Market Area Price/sqm NAV Assets Value (Rp (ha) (Rp '000) (Rp bn) bn) 1 Citra Garden City 6 West Jkt 2.5 18,000 450 24 2 Citra Garden City, other areasWest Jkt 39.1 16,000 6,256 337 Raw land 10.68 16,000 1,709 92 3 Citra Raya Tangerang West Java 100.8 3,000 3,024 163 raw land 333.78 3,000 10,013 540 4 Citra Indah Jonggol West Java 85.9 1,500 1,289 69 raw land 93 1,500 1,395 75 5 Citraland Surabaya East Java 148.6 7,400 10,996 592 raw land 379.38 7,400 28,074 1,513 6 Citraharmoni Sidoarjo East Java 24.1 3,900 940 51 raw land 28.02 3,900 1,093 59 7 Citraland lampung South Sum 14.8 3,500 518 28 raw land 6.72 3,500 235 13 8 Citragarden sidoarjo East Java 3 5,000 150 8 9 Citragarden lampung South Sum 1.9 2,000 38 2 10 Citraland Pekanbaru West Sum 5.3 4,000 212 11 raw land West Sum 1.92 4,000 77 4 11 Citraland NGK Jambi South Sum 2 3,400 54 3 Total 66,523 3,584 After tax 63,197 3,405 Recurring income 3,120 168 Sub total 66,317 3,573 Total shares (in mn) 18,560 Debt 4,430 239 Advances from cust 5,850 315 Cash 2,702 146 Net Asset Value 58,738 3,165 50% 50% disc to NAV 1,582 Target price 1,580 Market Price (IDR) 1,205 Upside Potential 31% Source: Bloomberg, SSI research www.samuel.co.id Page 3 of 5 Ciputra Development CTRA:IJ | CTRA.JK Key financial figures Profit and Loss Cash Flow Yr-end Dec (Rp bn) 15A 16A 17E 18E Yr-end Dec (Rp bn) 15A 16A 17E 18E Revenue 7,514 6,739 6,896 7,928 Net income 1,284 862 937 1,067 COGS (3,786) (3,450) (3,456) (3,947) Depreciation & amort. (223) (243) (248) (268) Gross profit 3,729 3,290 3,440 3,981 Working capital chg (1,638) (1,781) 1,227 (69) Gross margin (%) 49.6 48.8 49.9 50.2 Others 2,030 0 0 0 Operating profit 2,415 1,851 2,095 2,168 Operating cash flow 1,452 (1,162) 1,916 729 Opr margin (%) 32.1 27.5 30.4 27.4 Net - Capex (1,151) (701) (810) (932) EBITDA 2,528 1,990 2,228 2,308 Investing cash flow (2,562) (2,277) (449) (2,509) EBITDA margin (%) 33.6 29.5 32.3 29.1 Net - Borrowings 639 1,207 (983) 927 Other inc (expenses) (250) (350) (405) (646) Other financing 605 1,982 (567) 1,354 Pre-tax profit 1,885 1,326 1,346 1,522 Financing cash flow 1,244 3,189 (1,550) 2,281 Income tax - net (146) (155) (75) (75) Net - Cash flow 135 (249) (83) 501 Net profit 1,739 1,171 1,271 1,447 Cash at beginning 2,900 3,034 2,785 2,702 Net profit margin (%) 23.1 17.4 18.4 18.3 Cash at ending 3,034 2,785 2,702 3,203 -32.7% 8.5% 0 683 0 0 Balance Sheet Key Ratios Yr-end Dec (Rp bn) 15A 16A 17E 18E Yr-end Dec (Rp bn) 15A 16A 17E 18E Cash & ST Investment 3,034 3,468 2,702 3,203 ROE (%) 9.8 6.0 6.5 7.1 Receivables 1,323 1,702 1,742 2,002 ROA (%) 4.9 3.0 3.4 3.5 Inventories 7,531 7,945 7,575 7,849 Revenue growth (%) 18.5 (10.3) 2.3 15.0 Others 656 596 609 701 EPS growth (%) (3.1) (32.9) 8.7 13.8 Total current assets 12,545 13,711 12,627 13,755 Interest coverage (x) 3.9 2.3 2.2 2.1 Net fixed assets 2,962 3,034 3,115 3,182 Debt to equity (%) 40.4 45.2 36.7 42.8 Other assets 10,752 12,328 11,967 13,544 Net gearing (%) 17.2 20.9 17.9 21.4 Total assets 26,259 29,072 27,709 30,481 Payables 1,417 1,372 1,404 1,614 Major assumptions ST.
Recommended publications
  • Only Yesterday in Jakarta: Property Boom and Consumptive Trends in the Late New Order Metropolitan City
    Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 38, No.4, March 2001 Only Yesterday in Jakarta: Property Boom and Consumptive Trends in the Late New Order Metropolitan City ARAI Kenichiro* Abstract The development of the property industry in and around Jakarta during the last decade was really conspicuous. Various skyscrapers, shopping malls, luxurious housing estates, condominiums, hotels and golf courses have significantly changed both the outlook and the spatial order of the metropolitan area. Behind the development was the government's policy of deregulation, which encouraged the active involvement of the private sector in urban development. The change was accompanied by various consumptive trends such as the golf and cafe boom, shopping in gor­ geous shopping centers, and so on. The dominant values of ruling elites became extremely con­ sumptive, and this had a pervasive influence on general society. In line with this change, the emergence of a middle class attracted the attention of many observers. The salient feature of this new "middle class" was their consumptive lifestyle that parallels that of middle class as in developed countries. Thus it was the various new consumer goods and services mentioned above, and the new places of consumption that made their presence visible. After widespread land speculation and enormous oversupply of property products, the property boom turned to bust, leaving massive non-performing loans. Although the boom was not sustainable and it largely alienated urban lower strata, the boom and resulting bust represented one of the most dynamic aspect of the late New Order Indonesian society. I Introduction In 1998, Indonesia's "New Order" ended.
    [Show full text]
  • New Town Development in Indonesia Renegotiating, Shaping and Replacing Institutions
    Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde Vol. 167, no. 1 (2011), pp. 60-85 URL: http://www.kitlv-journals.nl/index.php/btlv URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-100913 Copyright: content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License ISSN: 0006-2294 MARLEEN DIELEMAN New town development in Indonesia Renegotiating, shaping and replacing institutions In line with the trend of urbanization in the developing world, Indonesia has undergone a rapid demographic shift from rural to urban areas. According to the United Nations, the proportion of urban dwellers in Indonesia was 17 per cent in 1970, 22 per cent in 1980, 31 per cent in 1990 and 42 per cent in 2000 and it has now surpassed 50 per cent (Urbanization 2007). This rapid urbaniza- tion is mirrored in the growth of Jabotabek1 and other Indonesian cities such as Surabaya in the past decades. Prices of land and real estate in and around urban areas, as well as the density and size of the cities, have increased significantly. The growth of urban areas has intensified the need for more infrastructure and services in the form of roads, sewerage, water management, public transport, and housing. The Indonesian government has not always been able to keep up with the increased growth, and Jakarta currently faces an assortment of problems such as regular flooding, pollution, security problems, poor road and pavement conditions, persistent traffic jams and inadequate public transport. Apart from urbanization, Indonesia has also witnessed significant eco- nomic growth in the past decades. During Soeharto’s New Order, for exam- ple, the economy grew at an average of 7 per cent annually over a period of 32 years (1966-1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 212 2nd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2018) Education Management of Early Childhood Education Programs (Case Study in Ciputra International School) Nimatur Rohmah, Yatim Riyanto, Moedjiarto Universitas Negeri Surabaya Surabaya, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract—Early childhood is an early stage associated kindergarten, Raudatul Athfal, or other similar forms. While with growth and development, education provided early on can early childhood education on the non-formal path in the create qualified Human Resources (HR). Early childhood form of Play Group, Child Care. Early childhood education education will be able to restore future community portraits to in the informal education path is in the form of family face the challenges of globalization, most of the early childhood education or education organized by the environment ". that follows the early childhood program benefit when they have entered adulthood. it can be said that the ability of both The importance of education provided to children early children is cognitive and non-cognitive that is able to facilitate on is able to prepare superior human resources and ready to to learn at the next level. This research used a qualitative compete in the era of globalization. In line opinion on more approach with a case study model. The results of this study cost-effective investment, early childhood education will be indicate that: (1) planning starts from formulating the vision able to recoup several times more investments than after and mission and socializing to all stakeholders, the planning consists of several programs namely improving the quality of school age (in school education) and adult age.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Big Business in Indonesia Christian Chua
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarBank@NUS CHINESE BIG BUSINESS IN INDONESIA THE STATE OF CAPITAL CHRISTIAN CHUA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2006 CHINESE BIG BUSINESS IN INDONESIA THE STATE OF CAPITAL CHRISTIAN CHUA (M.A., University of Göttingen/Germany) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2006 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout the years working on this study, the list of those who ought to be mentioned here grew tremendously. Given the limited space, I apologise that these acknowledgements thus have to remain somewhat incomplete. I trust that those whose names should, but do not, ap- pear here know that I am aware of and grateful for the roles they played for me and for this thesis. However, a few persons cannot remain unstated. Most of all, I owe my deepest thanks to my supervisor Vedi Hadiz. Without him, I would not have begun work on this topic and in- deed, may have even given up along the way. His patience and knowledgeable guidance, as well as his sharp mind and motivation helped me through many crises and phases of despair. I am thankful, as well, for the advice and help of Mary Heidhues, Anthony Reid, Noorman Ab- dullah, and Kelvin Low, who provided invaluable feedback on early drafts. During my fieldwork in Indonesia, I was able to work as a Research Fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Jakarta thanks to the kind support of its direc- tor, Hadi Soesastro.
    [Show full text]
  • Seds Project on Benchmarking: Sharing, Learning and Networking
    SEDS PROJECT ON BENCHMARKING: SHARING, LEARNING AND NETWORKING The Sulawesi Economic Development Strategy Project (SEDS) is a 5-year project funded by the Canadian Government and implemented by Humber College, in collaboration with seven (7) universities in Sulawesi. The SEDS project aims to strengthen the skills of the universities to design and deliver entrepreneurship education that produces graduates able to start their own businesses. The seven universities that become SEDS’ partners are Universitas Sam Ratulangi (UNSRAT), Universitas Negeri Manado (UNIMA), Universitas Klabat (UNKLAB), Universitas Katolik De La Salle (DE LA SALLE), Universitas Hasanuddin (UNHAS), Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM) and Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar (UNISMUH). Since the SEDS project launched in 2012, a series of workshops have taken place in Sulawesi, focused on applied entrepreneurship curriculum development and providing business support services to local entrepreneurs. These activities are expected to improve the SEDS’s partners capacity to empower entrepreneurship program development in the University, to grow young entrepreuners on campus, and to be able to deliver management services to foster Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Sulawesi. In order to strengthen the capacity of its partners, SEDS recently undertook benchmarking visits to provide opportunities for partners to study the development of a Business Service Centres in Yogyakarta and East Java that have been successful in cultivating young entrepreneurs. Benchmarking is an important process in which the organization can measure its progress by seeing firsthand the performance of other similar groups, in order toidentify best practices that can be adopted and adapted for the progress of the organization or Business Service Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Southeast Asia
    ISSN 0219-3213 2016 no. 13 Trends in Southeast Asia IS A NEW ENTREPRENEURIAL GENERATION EMERGING IN INDONESIA? GWENAËL NJOTO-FEILLARD AND KATHLEEN AZALI TRS13/16s ISBN 978-981-4762-46-5 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg 9 7 8 9 8 1 4 7 6 2 4 6 5 Trends in Southeast Asia 16-J00202 01 Trends_2016-13.indd 1 5/9/16 12:25 PM The ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute (formerly Institute of Southeast Asian Studies) was established in 1968. It is an autonomous regional research centre for scholars and specialists concerned with modern Southeast Asia. The Institute’s research is structured under Regional Economic Studies (RES), Regional Social and Cultural Studies (RSCS) and Regional Strategic and Political Studies (RSPS), and through country- based programmes. It also houses the ASEAN Studies Centre (ASC), Singapore’s APEC Study Centre, as well as the Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre (NSC) and its Archaeology Unit. 16-J00202 01 Trends_2016-13.indd 2 5/9/16 12:25 PM 2016 no. 13 Trends in Southeast Asia IS A NEW ENTREPRENEURIAL GENERATION EMERGING IN INDONESIA? GWENAËL NJOTO-FEILLARD AND KATHLEEN AZALI 16-J00202 01 Trends_2016-13.indd 3 5/9/16 12:25 PM Published by: ISEAS Publishing 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614 [email protected] http://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg © 2016 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia: the Atlas of Islamic World Science and Innovation Country
    Indonesia has much to offer the world. Its rich biodiversity could allow it, Indonesia for example, to pioneer cutting-edge research into pressing issues such as the effect of climate change on forests and oceans. Its geothermal stores allow for experimentation with generating renewable energy from the earth as well as through solar and wind sources. With food insecurity on the rise, Indonesia could also pioneer agricultural techniques that improve food productivity and nutrition. Once, Indonesia had the potential to emerge as a global scientific powerhouse, yet decades of neglect have left its infrastructure still too weak to build a robust R&D system. For now, the country needs to invest in the basics, ensuring that the foundation for good scientific practice is strong. It will also need the right people to make this happen, and it must focus on producing and rewarding high-quality researchers who are adept at critical thinking rather than just churning out high numbers of graduates. The research for this report was conducted as part of the Atlas of Islamic World Science and Innovation project. Bringing together partners from across the Islamic world, Europe and North America, it aims to explore the changing landscape of science and innovation across a diverse selection of countries with large Muslim populations. The Atlas of Islamic-World Science and Innovation Science and Islamic-World of Atlas The Indonesia The Atlas of Islamic World Science and Innovation Country Case Study Priya Shetty, Husein Akil, Trina Fizzanty, Grace Simamora 9 781782 520894 The Atlas of Islamic World Science and Innovation is supported by an international consortium of partners listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Indonesians After May 1998 107
    106 WacanaWacana Vol. Vol.18 No. 18 1No. (2017): 1 (2017) 106-130 Dewi Anggraeni, Chinese Indonesians after May 1998 107 Chinese Indonesians after May 1998 How they fit in the big picture Dewi Anggraeni ABSTRACT For Chinese Indonesians, May 1998 is a significant historical marker, twelfth and thirteenth being two concentrated days of riots and atrocities in Jakarta, followed by more, albeit on smaller scales, in Solo, Surabaya, and a number of other cities. Destruction of properties belonging to them, and rapes of their women, occurred. Then Indonesia witnessed the end of Suharto’s rule when the president resigned on 21 May 1998. A gradual political turn-around followed; Chinese Indonesians found room to move. The subsequent governments revoked restrictive regulations put in place by the New Order government, and lifted the suppression on cultural expression by Chinese Indonesians. The situation has progressed in conjunction with China’s rise in global economic dominance. Does China’s increasing international profile and rising global economic dominance help Chinese Indonesians? This article seeks to find some answer to the question as it looks at the development in the big picture; how and to what extent the social perceptions of Chinese Indonesians have evolved among the mainstream population; how they perceive themselves and believe how others perceive them; and how these may influence their lives as Indonesian citizens. KEYWORDS Chinese Indonesians; ethnic Chinese; New Order; Peranakan ; May 1998; Reformasi; SKBRI; ethnic profiling; ethnic markers; media; social media; INTI; NABIL; Chinese problems; assimilation; Chinese New Year; China. Dewi Anggraeni is a writer of fiction and non-fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitch Affirms Ciputra Development at 'BB-', Downgrades Ciputra Residence to 'A(Idn)'
    08 Jun 2020 Downgrade Fitch Affirms Ciputra Development at 'BB-', Downgrades Ciputra Residence to 'A(idn)' Fitch Ratings-Singapore/Jakarta-08 June 2020: Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of Indonesia-based property developer PT Ciputra Development Tbk (CTRA) at 'BB-'. The Outlook remains Negative. At the same time, Fitch Ratings Indonesia has downgraded wholly owned subsidiary PT Ciputra Residence's (CTRR) National Long-Term Rating to 'A(idn)' from 'A+(idn)' with a Negative Outlook. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this commentary. The Negative Outlook reflects our view of the significant challenges CTRA will face and its very limited rating headroom in the near term. CTRA's attributable pre-sales have been below IDR5 trillion, the level at which Fitch would consider negative rating action, and the pandemic has amplified the risks property developers face amid weak property demand over the next 12-18 months. CTRA had strong take-up rates across its various projects earlier in 2020 before the government imposed social distancing measures. However, the coronavirus pandemic has stalled CTRA's progress of recording IDR5 trillion in attributable pre-sales. This underpins the affirmation of the ratings. We believe CTRA needs to be able to book a minimum of IDR4 trillion of pre-sales in 2020 for the company to show an adequate trajectory to reach the IDR5 trillion threshold in the medium term. CTRR's rating is based on the consolidated profile of its parent, CTRA. The downgrade of CTRR's National Long-Term Rating follows our assessment of the company's weakening credit profile relative to its nationally rated peers.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2018'S Green Infrastructure Investment Opportunities
    GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES INDONESIA Published by the Climate Bonds Initiative Developed in partnership with Pembiayaan Investasi Non-Anggaran Pemerintah (PINA), a project of the National Development Planning Agency (BAPPENAS), and PT. EBA Indonesia. Green Infrastructure Investment Opportunities, Indonesia Contents This report highlights green infrastructure investment 3 Executive summary opportunities in Indonesia 4 Indonesia’s green infrastructure: an This report has been prepared to support “green”, are presented in a pipeline of opportunity for change Indonesia’s mission to develop low-carbon opportunities for investment in 2018-2019. and climate-resilient infrastructure. It Priorities for investment beyond 2019 are 5 Enabling infrastructure highlights green infrastructure investment also covered. investments will boost growth opportunities, with the aim of facilitating The report is part of a research series 7 Opportunities in global green engagement on this topic between project which will investigate green infrastructure finance owners and developers, and investors. investment opportunities in ASEAN 13 Green infrastructure investment The report is intended for a wide range (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) opportunities of stakeholders in Indonesia and abroad, member countries. including domestic and international 14 Transport In developing this report the Climate investors, companies and developers, 17 Energy Bonds Initiative consulted the Indonesian and relevant Indonesian Government 21 Water and waste
    [Show full text]
  • H. Winarso Access to Main Roads Or Low Cost Land? Residential Land Developers Behaviour in Indonesia
    H. Winarso Access to main roads or low cost land? Residential land developers behaviour in Indonesia In: Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, On the roadThe social impact of new roads in Southeast Asia 158 (2002), no: 4, Leiden, 653-676 This PDF-file was downloaded from http://www.kitlv-journals.nl Downloaded from Brill.com10/04/2021 02:29:57AM via free access HARYO WINARSO Access to main roads or low cost land? Residential land developers' behaviour in Indonesia The rapid growth of the urban population in the Third World has obvious implications not only for the provision of basic infrastructure but also for land development. It has been reported that in 1990, around 42 per cent of the Third World's total urban population was living in informal settlements, many of them located on urban fringes (World Resource Institute, quoted by Browder, Bohland, and Scarpaci 1995). But many urban residents also live in settlements on urban fringes created by land developers. This is particularly visible in cities of countries that have enjoyed massive economie growth, such as Bangkok (Foo 1992a, 1992b; Dowall 1991). In Jabotabek,1 the private sector has urbanized 16,600 hectares of rural land far away from the built-up area of Jakarta, selling around 25,000 hous- ing units annually. This was achieved by private developers in the Jabotabek area, an emerging mega-urban region in Indonesia, between the 1970s and the 1990s (Winarso 1999; Winarso and Kombaitan 1995). In the Jabotabek area, land developments, particularly those for residential use, have pen- etrated far into rural areas, creating urban sprawl (Henderson, Kuncoro, and Nasution 1996; Firman and Dharmapatni 1994; Firman 1994; Noe 1991; Winarso and Kombaitan 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Nomura ASEAN Virtual Conference (3 March 2021) One of Indonesia’S Leading Property Developer
    Nomura ASEAN Virtual Conference (3 March 2021) One of Indonesia’s Leading Property Developer Property Development for Sale Township Residential Condominium Office Core Business Commercial Property Development & Management Shopping Hotel ServicedServiced Office Others Mall ApartmentApartment - Business Presentation 2 Geographically Diversified Project Portfolio Kalimantan CitraGrand Senyiur City Samarinda CitraLand Banjarmasin Over 75 projects CitraGarden City Samarinda CitraGarden Banjarmasin CitraLand City Samarinda CitraGarden Aneka Pontianak in 33 cities across Medan CitraMitra City Banjarbaru CitraCity Balikpapan the nation. Pekanbaru Batam Sumatra Sulawesi CitraLand Gama City Medan Samarinda Jambi CitraPlaza Nagoya Batam CitraLand City Losari Makassar Pontianak Palu CitraLand Megah Batam Pangkal Pinang CitraLand Talassa City Makassar Balikpapan CitraRaya City Jambi Palembang CitraLand Celebes Makassar CitraLand NGK Jambi CitraGarden Makassar CitraLand Lampung Bengkulu Banjarmasin Vida View Makassar CitraGarden Lampung CitraGrand Galesong City Gowa CitraLand Palembang CitraLand Palu Banjarbaru Kendari CitraLand Pekanbaru CitraLand Kendari CitraGarden Pekanbaru Bandar CitraLand Botanical City Pangkal Lampung Makassar Pinang Jakarta Cirebon Maja Semarang Pekalongan Surabaya Bali Yogyakarta Malang Ciputra Beach Resort Denpasar Java CitraRaya Tangerang CitraGarden City Jakarta CitraLand BSB City Semarang CitraLand Surabaya CitraLand Driyorejo CBD CitraIndah City Jonggol Ciputra World Jakarta CitraGrand Semarang Ciputra World Surabaya The
    [Show full text]