DOCSLIB.ORG

Region 2'S Hurricanes Irma and Maria Response Efforts in Puerto Rico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Region 2'S Hurricanes Irma and Maria Response Efforts in Puerto Rico F U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Ensuring clean and safe water Region 2’s Hurricanes Irma and Maria Response Efforts in Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands Show the Need for Improved Planning, Communications, and Assistance for Small Drinking Water Systems Report No. 21-P-0032 December 3, 2020 Report Contributors: Stacey Banks Charles Brunton Kathlene Butler Lauretta Joseph Timothy Roach Jayson Toweh Khadija Walker Abbreviations EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency OIG Office of Inspector General PRASA Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority USVI U.S. Virgin Islands Cover Photos: Left to right: Hurricane Maria, a rural water system in Puerto Rico, and clean drinking water. (Photos from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, EPA OIG, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Are you aware of fraud, waste, or abuse in an EPA Office of Inspector General EPA program? 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2410T) Washington, D.C. 20460 EPA Inspector General Hotline (202) 566-2391 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2431T) www.epa.gov/oig Washington, D.C. 20460 (888) 546-8740 (202) 566-2599 (fax) [email protected] Subscribe to our Email Updates Follow us on Twitter @EPAoig Learn more about our OIG Hotline. Send us your Project Suggestions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 21-P-0032 Office of Inspector General December 3, 2020 At a Glance Why We Did This Audit Region 2’s Hurricanes Irma and Maria Response We conducted this audit to Efforts in Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands Show determine how the the Need for Improved Planning, Communications, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s preparedness and and Assistance for Small Drinking Water Systems response efforts for the three major hurricanes of 2017— What We Found specifically, hurricanes Harvey, Before hurricanes Irma and Maria made Irma, and Maria—protected Enhancements to water system landfall, Region 2 established an incident human health and water capacity and emergency command structure and staffing plan to preparation for island response resources from storm-related direct and manage its emergency response could better protect the health drinking water and surface water efforts. The region also contacted agencies of communities impacted by contamination. This report in Puerto Rico and the USVI to determine hurricanes and other disasters. addresses the response to the ability of the islands’ drinking water and drinking water and wastewater wastewater systems to weather the storms. systems impacted by hurricanes Irma and Maria in Puerto Rico Hurricane Irma approached Puerto Rico and the USVI on September 5, 2017, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. as a Category 5 storm. Beginning on September 20, 2017, Hurricane Maria struck the USVI as a Category 5 storm and Puerto Rico as a Category 4 storm. The OIG issued two previous After the hurricanes, regional emergency response staff performed operational reports assessing EPA assessments of drinking water and wastewater systems; conducted water Region 6’s preparedness and sampling and analyses; and helped small, rural drinking water systems obtain response efforts pertaining to generators. Despite these regional efforts and the federal government’s largest- water issues associated with ever hurricane response, some small, rural drinking water systems in Puerto Hurricane Harvey in Texas, and Rico and the USVI still had not returned to normal operations more than nine EPA Region 4’s preparedness months after the storms made landfall. The damage caused by the hurricanes and response efforts pertaining and the pre-storm conditions of those systems complicated the response. to water issues associated with Hurricane Irma in Florida. The EPA’s internal review processes delayed distribution of public health This audit addresses the announcements, such as instructions on how to treat drinking water to reduce following: risk of illness. In addition, Region 2 did not fully engage its local staff in Puerto Rico and the USVI during hurricane preparations. By adjusting its review-and- • Ensuring clean and safe water. approval process for public outreach information; strengthening the capacities of • Partnering with states and small, rural drinking water systems; and involving local EPA staff in the planning other stakeholders. • Operating efficiently and stages, Region 2 can improve the effectiveness of its emergency response effectively. efforts. This audit addresses two top EPA Recommendations and Planned Agency Corrective Actions management challenges: • Overseeing states and We made three recommendations to Region 2: first, develop and train staff on a territories implementing EPA procedure to locally disseminate public health information after emergencies; programs. second, develop a supplemental emergency response plan that includes roles • Communicating risks. for local staff and addresses specific geographic, logistical, and cultural Address inquiries to our public challenges; third, help improve the capacity and resilience of small, rural drinking affairs office at (202) 566-2391 or water systems. [email protected]. The region agreed with the recommendations and provided estimated milestone List of OIG reports. dates for its planned corrective actions. All recommendations are resolved. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL December 3, 2020 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Region 2’s Hurricanes Irma and Maria Response Efforts in Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands Show the Need for Improved Planning, Communications, and Assistance for Small Drinking Water Systems Report No. 21-P-0032 FROM: Sean W. O’Donnell TO: Peter Lopez, Regional Administrator Region 2 This is our report on the subject audit conducted by the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The project number for this audit is OPE-FY18-0005. This report contains findings that describe the problems the OIG has identified and corrective actions the OIG recommends. Final determinations on matters in this report will be made by EPA managers in accordance with established audit resolution procedures. The Region 2 regional administrator is responsible for the findings outlined in this report. In accordance with EPA Manual 2750, your office provided acceptable planned corrective actions and estimated milestone dates in response to OIG recommendations. All recommendations are resolved, and no final response to this report is required. However, if you submit a response, it will be posted on the OIG’s website, along with our memorandum commenting on your response. Your response should be provided as an Adobe PDF file that complies with the accessibility requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The final response should not contain data that you do not want to be released to the public. If your response contains such data, you should identify the data for redaction or removal along with corresponding justification. We will post this report to our website at www.epa.gov/oig. Region 2’s Hurricanes Irma and Maria Response 21-P-0032 Efforts in Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands Show the Need for Improved Planning, Communications, and Assistance for Small Drinking Water Systems Table of Contents Chapters 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ....................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................. 1 Responsible Offices .................................................................................... 5 Scope and Methodology .............................................................................. 6 Prior Reports ............................................................................................... 6 2 EPA Needs to Improve Its Emergency Response Planning, Communications, and Assistance to Small Water Systems ............................. 8 Conditions in Puerto Rico and USVI Slowed Response to Hurricanes Irma and Maria .................................................................... 8 EPA Emergency Response Personnel Provided Critical Help .................... 10 Hurricane Preparation and Response Activities Should Include All Local EPA Staff and Follow Cultural Norms ..................................... 13 EPA Could Better Inform the Public and Prepare Small Water Systems in Puerto Rico and USVI ........................................................................ 14 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 16 Recommendations ...................................................................................... 17 Agency Response and OIG Assessment .................................................... 17 Status of Recommendations and Potential Monetary Benefits .............................. 18 Appendices A Initial Agency Response to Draft Report ......................................................... 19 B Second Agency Response to Draft Report ...................................................... 24 C Distribution ......................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 1 Introduction Purpose The U.S. Environmental Protection Top Management Challenges Agency’s Office of Inspector General This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUPPORTING RESILIENT RECONSTRUCTION in DOMINICA Building Back Better for a Resilient Future
    SUPPORTING RESILIENT RECONSTRUCTION IN DOMINICA Building back better for a resilient future AT A GLANCE Country Dominica Damage to housing across all parishes following Hurricane Maria Risks Hurricanes; Floods; Landslides; Earthquakes Area of Engagement Enabling resilient recovery By improving the uptake of resilient building practices, Dominica can limit the damage from natural hazards. Data source: Hurricane Maria Post-Disaster Needs Assessment DOMINICA’S VULNERABILITY TO NATURAL HAZARDS Dominica is located within the Atlantic hurricane belt and SHARING RESULTS, LEVERAGING is extremely vulnerable to high-intensity weather events FINANCING AND STARTING TO such as high winds, excess rainfall and hurricanes. Physical REBUILD development in Dominica is concentrated along narrow coastal areas, particularly in the south and west. Housing is Following both Hurricane Maria and Tropical Storm Erika, not built to withstand extreme natural hazards, with wood and Dominica conducted Post-Disaster Needs Assessments (PDNAs), galvanized sheeting being most common for roofing and with with support from the ACP-EU NDRR Program*, which is few confined masonry buildings. managed by the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) and the World Bank. On September 18, 2017, Hurricane Maria hit Dominica with catastrophic effects. Hurricane Maria was one of the most The Hurricane Maria PDNA identified housing as the most rapidly intensifying storms in recent history, leaving Dominica affected sector and one of the most important and challenging exposed to winds, flash floods and landslides. The impacts of areas for recovery. Building on the recommendations of the Hurricane Maria were severe both for the country’s economy Hurricane Maria PDNA, the ACP-EU NDRR Program launched as well as the human development of its citizens, and affected the “Enhancing Resilient Reconstruction in Dominica” project.
    [Show full text]
  • UB Powerpoint Template
    converge.colorado.edu CONVERGE ethical, coordinated, and scientifically rigorous social science, engineering, and interdisciplinary extreme events research Lori Peek Principal Investigator, CONVERGE, SSEER, and ISEEER Director, Natural Hazards Center Professor, Department of Sociology University of Colorado Boulder Session 2: Collecting, Managing, and Archiving Social and Behavioral Science Data Describe opportunities for identifying and coordinating social science researchers so that we can best share information and publish our data as well as data collection protocols using DOIs, repositories, etc. Discuss some of the overarching challenges and concerns with sharing social science data, such as privacy, data management plans and related IRB policies, duplication vs. replication, etc. converge.colorado.edu 4 Things converge.colorado.edu 1. NSF has funded the CONVERGE initiative converge.colorado.edu Why CONVERGE? Why CONVERGE? • identify and coordinate researchers and research teams; • advance hazards and disaster research; • encourage the publication of data and data collection instruments and protocols (DesignSafe Cyberinfrastructure + CONVERGE). • support and accelerate training and mentoring; • fund virtual reconnaissance, field research, and the development of novel research instruments and data collection protocols; • accelerate the development of mobile applications for social science data collection (NHERI RAPID); Why CONVERGE? 2. NSF Supports Extreme Events Research (EER) Networks converge.colorado.edu Why the EER’s? Disciplinary
    [Show full text]
  • Persistent Hydrological Consequences of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico
    RESEARCH LETTER Persistent Hydrological Consequences of Hurricane 10.1029/2018GL081591 Maria in Puerto Rico Special Section: P. W. Miller1,2 , A. Kumar1, T. L. Mote1 , F. D. S. Moraes1 , and D. R. Mishra1 The Three Major Hurricanes of 2017: Harvey, Irma and Maria 1Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA, 2Now at Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA Key Points: • Landscape vegetation metrics for Puerto Rico remained depressed Abstract In September 2017, Hurricane Maria severely defoliated Puerto Rico's landscape, coinciding below pre‐Maria values for with a series of persistent hydrological consequences involving the atmospheric, terrestrial, and marine approximately two months after components of the water cycle. During the defoliated period, the atmosphere's thermodynamic structure landfall 2 2 2 • Cloud and precipitation activity more strongly explained daily cloud activity (R PRE = 0.02; R POST = 0.40) and precipitation (R PRE = 0.19; demonstrated a stronger 2 R POST = 0.33) than before landfall, indicating that post‐Maria land‐atmosphere interactions were relationship to the atmospheric comparatively muted, with similar precipitation patterns also found following Hurricanes Hugo (1989) and thermodynamic profile during the defoliated period Georges (1998). Meanwhile, modeled post‐Maria runoff exceeded statistical expectations given the magnitude • Subsurface runoff responses to of contemporaneous precipitation. Enhanced runoff also coincided with greater sediment loads in nearshore rainfall and coastal suspended waters, increasing sediment content greater than twofold. This study offers a holistic narrative of sediment values remained elevated for two and four months, hydrospheric disturbance and recovery, whereby the instantaneous, large‐scale removal of vegetation is respectively accompanied by hydrologic changes “upstream” in the atmosphere and “downstream” in rivers and estuaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Damage Detection on Four Major Caribbean Islands T ⁎ Kirsten M
    Remote Sensing of Environment 229 (2019) 1–13 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Remote Sensing of Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rse Hurricane damage detection on four major Caribbean islands T ⁎ Kirsten M. de Beursa, , Noel S. McThompsona, Braden C. Owsleya, Geoffrey M. Henebryb,c a Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, United States of America b Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, United States of America c Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, Michigan State University, United States of America ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Tropical cyclones are natural events that transform into natural disasters as they approach and reach land. In Hurricanes 2017 alone, tropical cyclones caused an estimated $215 billion in damage. While MODIS data are regularly used Droughts in the analysis of hurricanes and typhoons, damage studies typically focus on just a few events without providing MODIS a comprehensive overview and comparison across events. The MODIS record is now sufficiently long to enable Disturbance standardization in time, allowing us to extend previously developed disturbance methodology and to remove Tasseled Cap dependency on land cover datasets. We apply this new approach to detect the impact of both droughts and hurricanes on the four largest Caribbean islands since 2001. We find that the percentage of disturbed land on the four islands varies from approximately 0–50% between 2001 and 2017, with the highest percentages coinciding with major droughts in Cuba, and Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico. We demonstrate that (1) Hurricane Maria resulted in significant disturbance across 50% of Puerto Rico (4549 km2), and (2) gradual recovery started about 2.5 months after the hurricane hit.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Marãa Tripled Stem Breaks and Doubled Tree Mortality Relative
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09319-2 OPEN Hurricane María tripled stem breaks and doubled tree mortality relative to other major storms María Uriarte 1, Jill Thompson2 & Jess K. Zimmerman3 Tropical cyclones are expected to intensify under a warming climate, with uncertain effects on tropical forests. One key challenge to predicting how more intense storms will influence these ecosystems is to attribute impacts specifically to storm meteorology rather than dif- 1234567890():,; ferences in forest characteristics. Here we compare tree damage data collected in the same forest in Puerto Rico after Hurricanes Hugo (1989, category 3), Georges (1998, category 3), and María (2017, category 4). María killed twice as many trees as Hugo, and for all but two species, broke 2- to 12-fold more stems than the other two storms. Species with high density wood were resistant to uprooting, hurricane-induced mortality, and were protected from breakage during Hugo but not María. Tree inventories and a wind exposure model allow us to attribute these differences in impacts to storm meteorology. A better understanding of risk factors associated with tree species susceptibility to severe storms is key to predicting the future of forest ecosystems under climate warming. 1 Department of Ecology Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027, USA. 2 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QB, UK. 3 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00925, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.U. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2019) 10:1362 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09319-2 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09319-2 yclonic storms (hurricanes, cyclones, and typhoons) exposure to wind or the structure and composition of forests at Crepresent the dominant natural disturbance in coastal the time the storm struck.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Maria
    Hurricane Maria Six-Month Update | April 2018 Red Cross Response Continues to Aid Communities with Urgent Needs More than six months after Hurricane Maria’s high winds We also worked to help survivors cope with day-to- and torrential rainfall devastated Puerto Rico, the U.S. day difficulties caused by the destruction of much of Virgin Islands and islands throughout the Caribbean, the the island’s power grid. For example, water pumps American Red Cross continues to provide life-sustaining aren’t functioning in many communities with ongoing support for people with urgent needs. In Maria’s wake, power outages, leaving thousands of residents thousands of hurricane survivors, particularly in more without access to safe drinking water. Red Cross isolated communities, face long-term challenges disaster workers traveled throughout Puerto Rico, brought about by severe storm damage to homes and supplying water filters to these heavily impacted infrastructure—including lack of power and clean water. areas and training people on how to purify the water they are drawing from wells, streams and rivers. Using the RC View data collection system, Red Cross volunteers and employees have been able to assess In addition, the Red Cross is providing critical health damage, identify unmet needs and target communities and mental health services for people dealing with across Puerto Rico where additional support is required. ongoing medical needs that were further complicated We have delivered vital relief items like drinking water, by damage to the health care infrastructure, as well as bulk food items and cleanup supplies, as well as tarps to those suffering from heartbreaking loss.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005
    MARCH 2008 ANNUAL SUMMARY 1109 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005 JOHN L. BEVEN II, LIXION A. AVILA,ERIC S. BLAKE,DANIEL P. BROWN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, RICHARD D. KNABB,RICHARD J. PASCH,JAMIE R. RHOME, AND STACY R. STEWART Tropical Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 2 November 2006, in final form 30 April 2007) ABSTRACT The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active of record. Twenty-eight storms occurred, includ- ing 27 tropical storms and one subtropical storm. Fifteen of the storms became hurricanes, and seven of these became major hurricanes. Additionally, there were two tropical depressions and one subtropical depression. Numerous records for single-season activity were set, including most storms, most hurricanes, and highest accumulated cyclone energy index. Five hurricanes and two tropical storms made landfall in the United States, including four major hurricanes. Eight other cyclones made landfall elsewhere in the basin, and five systems that did not make landfall nonetheless impacted land areas. The 2005 storms directly caused nearly 1700 deaths. This includes approximately 1500 in the United States from Hurricane Katrina— the deadliest U.S. hurricane since 1928. The storms also caused well over $100 billion in damages in the United States alone, making 2005 the costliest hurricane season of record. 1. Introduction intervals for all tropical and subtropical cyclones with intensities of 34 kt or greater; Bell et al. 2000), the 2005 By almost all standards of measure, the 2005 Atlantic season had a record value of about 256% of the long- hurricane season was the most active of record.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Overview: Impact of Hurricanes Irma and Maria
    REGIONAL OVERVIEW: IMPACT OF MISSION TO HURRICANES IRMA AND MARIA CONFERENCE SUPPORTING DOCUMENT 1 The report was prepared with support of ACAPS, OCHA and UNDP 2 CONTENTS SITUATION OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 4 KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Overall scope and scale of the impact ....................................................................................... 5 Worst affected sectors ...................................................................................................................... 5 Worst affected islands ....................................................................................................................... 6 Key priorities ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Challenges for Recovery ................................................................................................................. 7 Information Gaps ................................................................................................................................. 7 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RECOVERY ................................................................................ 10 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA — Costliest U.S. Tropical Cyclones Tables Updated
    NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER 11691 SW 17th Street Miami, FL 33165 www.hurricanes.gov Facebook Twitter Costliest U.S. tropical cyclones tables updated NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) in consultation with the National Hurricane Center (NHC) has updated the listing of costliest tropical cyclones to strike the United States mainland. This listing was previously found in the NOAA memorandum The Deadliest, Costliest and Most Intense U.S. Tropical Cyclones, linked at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/nws-nhc-6.pdf These new tables listed below replace Tables 3a and 3b in the above document. The first table (3a), not adjusted for inflation, lists 36 tropical cyclones from 1900 to 2017 that caused at least 1 billion dollars in damage on the U.S. mainland, and another five striking U.S. territories or Hawaii. The second table (3b) accounts for inflation to 2017 dollars. For all United States hurricanes, Katrina (2005) is the costliest storm on record. Hurricane Harvey (2017) ranks second, Hurricane Maria (2017) ranks third, Hurricane Sandy (2012) ranks fourth and Hurricane Irma (2017) ranks fifth. Hurricane Maria is the costliest hurricane on record to strike Puerto Rico and the U.S Virgin Islands. The NCEI data set provides more loss information than previous damage figures used by NHC, including agriculture, individual payouts, and disaster money from the federal government to the respective states. In performing these disaster cost assessments, NCEI examined statistics from a wide variety of sources. Using the latest scientific methodology, it determined the estimated total costs of these events - that is, the costs in terms of dollars that would not have been incurred had the event not taken place.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria of That Year Truly Tested the Capacities of Federal, State, and Local Emer- Gency Management
    distribute or People walk down a flooded street as they evacuate their homes after the area was inundated with flooding from Hurricane Harvey on August 28, 2017 in Houston, Texas. 9post, Joe Raedle/Getty Images HURRICANEScopy, HARVEY, IRMA, not AND MARIA U.S. Disaster Management Challenged Door the United States and its territories, 2017 was a record-breaking hurricane year. It brought F10 hurricanes, which collectively inflicted an estimated $265 billion in damage.1 Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria of that year truly tested the capacities of federal, state, and local emer- gency management. During the responses to each, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and its Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mobilized disaster assistance volunteers, a 351 Copyright ©2020 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. 352 Disaster Policy and Politics “surge” workforce2 of volunteering federal workers detailed from inside and outside of the department for up to 45-day assignments, plus an immense and largely corpo- rate contractor force, and the altruistic nonprofit organizations so intrinsically part of disaster response and recovery. A host of other federal agencies, including the U.S. Army, Air Force, and Navy, worked the disasters as well. Impacted states and territories, along with their respective local governments, worked feverishly to address the escalating needs of their victims and communities, while they awaited much needed federal post-disaster assistance. The National Response Framework provided a schematic overlay about how the nation would respond, and the National Incident Management System guided the organization of the actual response in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • High Commissioner's Dialogue on Protection Challenges
    High Commissioner’s Dialogue on Protection Challenges: Protection and Resilience during Pandemics Refugees International Written Statement for the session on Climate Action Climate-related impacts are leading to displacement and forcing people to migrate today We are in the midst of a climate crisis. The disruptive effects of climate change are being felt today. Nowhere is this more evident than in climate-related disaster displacement trends. For example, in 2019, weather-related events led to almost 24 million displaced people around the world, or more than three times the amount displaced by conflict the same year.1 While not all of these events are necessarily climate-related, they do speak to a worrying trend; namely, that sudden-onset weather events, such as hurricanes or floods, are increasing in frequency and intensity due to climate change. The climate science is clear. For instance, in 2017, Hurricane Maria was 30 percent more powerful than any other storm ever recorded in Puerto Rico – an occurrence that climate change is making five times more likely.2 The storm displaced 86,000 Puerto Ricans, with some 130,000 leaving the island for mainland United States in the aftermath.3 It also leveled much of the island Dominica and displaced 80 percent of its population.4 In 2019, Hurricane Dorian stalled over the Bahamas for more than 24 hours, supporting research that finds that hurricanes in the North Atlantic have been moving more slowly and stalling for longer periods due to climate change.5 Dorian was the strongest hurricane to ever hit the country, and it displaced 14,000 people.6 1 Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC).
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of a Hurricane on Hampton Roads the ECONOMIC IMPACT of a HURRICANE on HAMPTON ROADS
    The Economic Impact Of A Hurricane On Hampton Roads THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF A HURRICANE ON HAMPTON ROADS When clouds are seen, wise men put on their cloaks; When great leaves fall, then winter is at hand; When the sun sets, who doth not look for night? Untimely storms make men expect a dearth. – “Richard III,” Act 2, Scene 3 he rain began to fall on Norfolk in the early morning of Sept. 2, 1821. Within two hours, winds reached gale force, increasing to hurricane force by 11:30 a.m.1 When the winds and rain abated that afternoon, residents emerged to a scene of devastation. The Norfolk Herald recorded an account of the hurricane’s passage: “From half past 11:00 until half past 12:00, so great the fury of the elements, that they seemed to threaten a general demolition of everything within their reach. During that period the scene was awful. There was the deafening roar of the storm, with the mingled crashing of windows and Tfalling of chimneys, while the rapid rise of the tide threatened to inundate the town.” For the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News metropolitan statistical area1 storm when it passed through Virginia, Jeffrey D. Stern, state coordinator for (MSA), also referred to as the Hampton Roads MSA, the question is not if, the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM), estimated that but when a major tropical storm or hurricane will impact the region again. Matthew caused nearly $500 million in damage.2 Even a relatively weak hurricane would likely cause significant damage to property, displace residents and reduce economic activity.
    [Show full text]