DOCSLIB.ORG

Notes Du Mont Royal ←

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notes Du Mont Royal ← Notes du mont Royal www.notesdumontroyal.com 쐰 Cette œuvre est hébergée sur « No- tes du mont Royal » dans le cadre d’un exposé gratuit sur la littérature. SOURCE DES IMAGES Google Livres HIST ORIÆ P0 ETICÆ SCRIPTORES -ANTIŒJI. APO nono RU s Atbcnimfil. prou MIE U s mm. r. c o’N qui Grammticut- man; EN 1 U s Néumfis. ANTONINUS LIBERALIS. 35 Græcè &Latinè. q Acte-fière étaye: Non d- Indim- mafia". PARISIIS. Typis F- M u au: 1. Proflant apud R. S c o T T, Bibliopolam Londinenfem. MDCLxxm 1 L L u s T RI DJOSEPHO WILLIAMSON; E gu 1 n maure, 3ERE NISSIMO CAROLOH. j MAG.BRIT. FRANC. ET HIE. REGI l ’ A CONSILns INTERIORIBUS, ET A SECRETIS STATuS. Y Xflzznt in me, V1 R CLARISSIME, . 4 ’ Promerita tua , magna f 72è (9* dmmrna. Sponte tuâ , nullo me: "mita, dtfcena’ifli etiam ad 1728,84 benewolentiâ, quâ Genti: a . hujnr Epiflola Dedicato-riaf bujur Ô aliarum literato: homi- ne: campleéïeria. Necfpem, nec cogitationem quidem foui, alignant . aliquid tanna beneficii: unquam reponendi g neque enim patiebatur id autfortunn YUÆr magnitudo, ont men anguflz’a. Non ceflb interim juflâ debitâq; prodicationo ubiq; teflari tantum Tibi débere me, quantum fermé homo bomini poteflfugi bâc(nullâ aliâ de coiffa) gratitudinir mon: fignzficandæ curâ adduôîm, N omini Tuo ho: li- bella: infiripfi. Malui parum mo- deflu: balzan, quina minù: gratua. Quanquam confllio louis. meo-illud ctiam patrocinari pofigquàrl non ira Pridem (gradua ((21 laumaroitas)flu- diorum mêorum rationcmTe ex- peétare Epiftola Dcdicatoria.’ peâare dicerer. Obtempero jufi: un 5 etiam ad exifiimationi: ’ me Periculum. H ne ramon qua- liacunque fiant, non profil: , uti fiera, apud TE wilejèent. V o- torum religioni niai! addit marmor gamma pretiofum,nec detrabit ruile faxum, fed nuncupantu ani- : mus. Hunc utwelz’: intueri, non .1 que (firuntur, obnixè rogat, à . SUMME VIR, afin-hm Amplitudini Tuæ Devotiflîm us Londini, Decemb. Idib.Auno M DC LXXV. 7H 0. GA LE. in) Ææâüæâæéëâââs’ëëëæü’: Wæææææææææîæ B I B L I O T H E Æ Apollodori Atbenienfir. PAgiJixu. ’Ouggûc] Fait hac Orphicorum de Diis traditio; ab iis ad Græcos pervertir. Dio- doms, Eufebius ex Eucmero, Athcnagons ex - Orphco hoc nos docent. V3110 de L.L. Prin- cipe: Dn’ Caban [Cælw] à Terra, n. apud Græcos s mm in [Égypte Scrapu à Ifir, in Latin principe: Satur- mà 01m Philo Byblius ex Phœnicum Thcologia aliosdcos Cœlo antiquiores? rcccnfct. V. EuIèb. Bo- tthius uoque in Porphyrium libre 3.fic Eribinâ’àmn- Un une": Yin-algol, refont" forfait" ad Summum, 801mm: 4d C clam, Cælm ad antiquiflînmm Ûpbt’onem, i ou)»; 2 A Nome in I. Lib. Apollodori. cujw deum efi’ principium. Eadem ferè habct Schol. Æfihyliadv.957. Promethei; 8c Tzetzes in Lyco- phroncm. Epici Cyclifcriptorcs bine originem per- petui carminis deduccbant. V. Procli Chxefioma- thiam. I L. 7. Bgu’gwr, ruina] Apud Hcfiodum legis 1.57.". Athenagoras ex Orpheo candem leâionem confir- N mat. Scholiafiæ tamen Apollonii Rhodii ita Scri- - ’ ’ Îbunt. ut me Cditutaôc n’y" eundem elfe volunt cum .1 Bfiareo. Horatio quoque dicitur Gyas centima- nus. Ibidâlco’ior] Hefiodo 85 Athen. :8179- dicitur, 8c .Pa- rœmîographis x26]: il; Baignoiwçênpe’i infra in aliâ ’ . progenie occurrit Ko’iQ- , cujus Virgilius mami- ait. ’L. 15. ’Açnr] Hcfiodo I’Ag-ym a Schol. Æfèhyli a: Athenag.’AnG-. Vox cf: percgrina, ofiendit fe in . 3 Marci,v;17. Plut: de his ex Antiquis adfert Schol. Eurip. in initie Alcefi. Tria elfe Cyclopum genera obfervant viri doâi. 1-. Hos iplbs 52.qui Tirynthcm minibus cinxerunt; 3.quos Virgilius Æmæos vo- CH. Pag. 2. lin. 2. Tépuw] Orpheus apud Proclum ’ .0"; 3:th d’un; 3 ’Ouaivà; ----u’1w’uper 3.11293391qu K43 90,6" and" Mât 84507 plus 53e Têtu" Luc. mu] Alii Kpfdo,& Poct. mon» feribunt. 16. Anima] Ex Orpheo; omifit Hefiodus, Tir .Ognpîunhumln --1g même; aduler. T2ctzesôc Alexander Rhetor. :3. bang] Rem narratOrpheus apud Prochain. So- ilus Titenius, qui fait antiquiflîmus Titanamr, ut mp- o Nota: in I. Lib. Apollodori. 3 faipsêrc Hier 8c Philochorus; Sain: Sol ab injuriâ Mm câlinait, inquit Servius ad 6 inti]. C2- tcrùm prætcr bos Cœli 8c Terre filios Stephanus Ethnicographus alios recenfet in v.’AJa.n 8c MM)". Emploi banc quem pallia eft Calas 8c Saturnus ad Phyfioiogiam transfcrunt Communs, Porphyrius de Anno,& Produs in TimzLun,cx Orphco. 1’343.ij Ms. Oxon. 8c Pain. qui. 01v bac maori»: prima: caramba)" S cumin. Tertul- lhwsex Phcrccydc. Saturnum 8c Rheam hommes Me, Demain autan numcro à Phœnicibus mil-clip- tos prodidit Sambaniâthon apud Thcodorenun, 3 u. mania] Lege --uûx a Meliiïei. fumigène si:contra MME: mandant faimGræcos. regain Cm1, ad ajut ifilin 5mn; nuiriendumfmflê damnation. Hyginus Poc- tic- Anton. Serviusad 3 Endd. Virgilhls 4.8eorg. bas Nymphas intelligit apes. chobius in Adag. more fuo totam banc aux): exicripfit. 293Mo] Orphea faquitur. Agathoéles Babylonius la- pider!) hune ex Proeconnefo petimm feripfit. Voca- batnr anime, inquit Hefychius. De Bætuliis mul- îa Damafcius in Vin lfidori. V. ’Seldcnum de Diis Syris ex Scal’ o adN. Euièbaost. P4.l.l.’Eynfiâfl L. îfiu’lo. ’ 2. nm] min; Orphicorum deus cran Hic igitur He- Îlodus incipit Orphca meut", v. notam 16. p.2. - in ’Ep’confer I] M55. 69’ î. Hcliod.Theog.Mox,iidcm,e’fç’inyxa legunr. L1- v.886. ncâ 20 rcflituc 8907131 gémir g maman Damaf- dus :3an libre mg) ipxôy Orphciverfus adfert, m quibus non dam: aïs-51m . De Cyclopibus inquic Oxpheus, A; 91. V4 Notæ in t. Lib. Apollodori. ci Il"? 3077i: a; taf, n35" a! M013! [1951" mûovfixqu- , 2 5. ’Ev qui Taurin] Saturnum cum Titanibus intellige. Nota in hac re illud apud Auâorem libelli de Flu- minibus, T3: Pl Mme, «bien; Ziô; aimai égiça ras-nig- n’poCn. Augufiinus alicubi commemorat lances . deorum pedes. ’Aumm columnam pafitam il)? infana fonio Tripbylii ab ipfi fait, tituba indicabat, in quâ columnâgefia fiaaperfiripfit. Laâant. ex Ennio Euc- meri interprete. Es. 1.5. 2166] Ægii codd. 8c Pal. habent SwEôr,Hcfi- odus 21.56. Styx a: Zeuxa inter Occanidas; utra hîc retinenda fit, dubium cil; quoniam paucæ recenfeno tur,v.p.67. L. 6. .AfLQI7CJ’7fl] Heiiodus 86 Cod.Pal. 14491945, naît. Amphitrite 8c Styx notiores’e’rant (cribæ, quàm Am- phiro 8: Zeuxo ,j cit autem Amphitrite ex aliâ L. And] Apollonius Rhodius Km’yîuu vocat.Cal- limachoente. limai; (mallem .[(qu1; ) 86 Kami"; dici- L9. cola] Hefiodus 8c Schol. une. Hyginus (amen Æthramtur. ei uxorem l dat. LJ I. ’EuçuBoiu] L.’EvguCiag, ut 8c p.6. Hefiodus emen- dandus in hâc parte, mm apud’ cum Koïe- huius Eu- rybiæ dicitur maritus, pro quoiKeÏO- fubfiitui debet x4.ex qui... noliro a? Mss. hîc 8c 6c infra Tzetze. legunt 5?. à . 20. x4991] lus Centaurorum Chiron natus ex Sa- turne , reliqui nubigenœ ex Ixione 8c Ne- plus. 28. 211473; Nota! in 1.Lib. Apollodori. ’ s :8. 2mn] Styx numpha a; fons.]upîter Nymphz fa- yens honorem fond habuit. Apollodorus libro 24. qui 315: cgit de rebus apud lnferos,adeoquede Styge; flétan) liane ait in» finît «N 3704161114, Styx enim omnia corrumpit 8c confumit. Dii contrà 1’51! oa- qîq à ni «in; chu-immPlura vide apud Stobæum p.12 9. Ed. Canter. Rit autem Styx proprie non En 43h, (éd infra in Tartaro,ubi Dii puniuntur,Saturnus a: Titaness nain ut Erynnys animas punit, ira Styx dcos. 26.1.5. cagne] L. 069m. La 2. pro 1&5.ng , uterque codex feriptus habet d’un 1 8. roumain J In his magna difcrepantia , mm tuyau», rouvrirai, Hefi.& Pal.legunt. on.) Anna. 11907441441,rani-nm, Hga’lopifla,HCCmflop.0.& renifla P. - H45", ’Hlôrn,Hefiod. .AMpiJN, ’ANpidlt,HCfiOd, proNégus, Nnmrnir. i Alîdvjy, "1511,49, 11145, Horn. noMI, TIR-rufian. ’A01076I, ’Au’loyâpn. Nain, Mini-n, Bel: qui... NnniuJ-ICC nom.sch.Apon. Amand", Amphi» , Hygin. Inter bas Nereidas qualèlam miicuit Oceanidas, titi clarum cit exHefiodo 8c tabulis Genealogicis. Orphe- as numerabat quinquaginta, cum fequitur Heliodus a Homcrus triginta, non une magnâ nominum varietate ab bis a Apollodorus quadraginta 8c quinque . Hygi- nus his quatuor adjecit. .Apud Hefiodum bis ponitur ngqyâ,altcro in loco ponerem "M76, hanc enim in fuis ’ A 3 cxw 6 Notæ in 1. Lib. Apollodori. cxemplaribus repent Ægius. Ariûarchus numerum Hefiodi auxit, addendo eoüy,vereor,ut reâè,nam en ad aliam familiam pertinet. ?.7.l. 1. Mr il aunâmeçv] ’Icât 15”49, multum veterî- bus decantatus. Pifander Larandenfis de hac re VI. libros carminum feripfit. His in nuptiis citrum pri- mô è terrâ ortum feripfit Aièlepiades Rerum Ægypt. libre LX. Pythagorici mon» binario junanem idea defignabangquod uni infini acceflioue alterna tubere- ret: Vulcana oflanarium adfiribebant, quoniam’ex pri- ma motu,i.e. dyade, que juin dt, confier. Capella. 3.’Agylw] Lege’Agm. Q1011 autem fequitur "1711.0, ôte. fcias ex Orpheo depromi, ut locupletiflimetc- flatur Athenagoras. 9. notas] Hefiodus vetfu gos ex ]ove &Themide procreatas feribit, idem verfu 2 183ejufdem Theogo- niæ, Noâis tillas facit. Diu efi cùm fufpicatus fum .illud opus non cire unius hominis. Orpheus fuit au- âor ultimæ fententiæ,câmque alicubi lècutus cit So- phoclcs; collige hoc ex Phylicis Stobæi. P.8. 1.10. Tain-44;] L. une,» Porro Orpheus non invenit, Ed ex Ægypto in Græciam tranllulit filera Bacchi. ldeoinve-ntor creditus, quoniam multain- novavit. V. Diod. Sic. LI. Biblimhecæ. ln Latinis rectifia verras, ille nibil tale ardeur ,converfiu remarie nacarat". Rem banc inouï; exfequitur Virgilius 4. L. 12. Tintin] L. «bain. O quarra piger lolia haïe omni en: lineâ renafccntia devorare -’ Lui. min] Eui’tathius ad me. p.3 38. cd. Rom.aliam Georg.Magnctis familiam percenfet, in qui nulla occurrit . Picri Menrio. 19.Wàuvsoy] De hoc v. p. 197. Hefychium in ’11- ’ airain , 8c quæ ad Palæphatum. Schol. Nicandri ’ ’ ’ vulx Nota in 1.Lib.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche Und Vorarbeiten Band 64
    Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten Herausgegeben von Jörg Rüpke und Christoph Uehlinger Band 64 19-08-13 14:44:08 TITEL4 U272 Format: 155 x 230 mm Metaserver2 (PKW) Release 19.00x SOLAR 31May13.1609 on Fri May 31 17:09:48 BST 2013 Cities and Priests Cult personnel in Asia Minor and the Aegean islands from the Hellenistic to the Imperial period Edited by Marietta Horster and Anja Klöckner DE GRUYTER 19-08-13 14:44:08 TITEL4 U272 Format: 155 x 230 mm Metaserver2 (PKW) Release 19.00x SOLAR 31May13.1609 on Fri May 31 17:09:48 BST 2013 ISBN 978-3-11-031837-1 e-ISBN 978-3-11-031848-7 ISSN 0939-2580 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. © 2013 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Druck: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen ♾ Gedruckt auf säurefreiem Papier Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com 19-08-13 14:44:09 TITEL4 U272 Format: 155 x 230 mm Metaserver2 (PKW) Release 19.00x SOLAR 31May13.1609 on Fri May 31 17:09:48 BST 2013 Contents Acknowledgements ! VII Abbreviations ! IX Marietta Horster, Anja Klöckner (Mainz/Gießen) Introduction ! 1 Delphine Ackermann (Poitiers) Les prêtrises mixtes : genre, religion et société ! 7 Ludwig Meier (Heidelberg) Priests and Funding of Public Buildings on Cos and Elsewhere ! 41 Isabelle Pafford (San Francisco) Priestly Portion vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Du Mont Royal ←
    Notes du mont Royal www.notesdumontroyal.com 쐰 Cette œuvre est hébergée sur « No- tes du mont Royal » dans le cadre d’un exposé gratuit sur la littérature. SOURCE DES IMAGES Google Livres H15 TORIÆ PO*ETICÆ SCRIPTORES ANTICLUI; A?0LLODORUS Athenimfis. PTOLEMÆUS www. CONO N Grammaticm. PARTHENIUS Niumfis. AN’Î ON INUS LIBERALIS, Græoë 8c Latiné. Accçfiën brave: Nm é Indice: maqflàrjr’. PA R I S I I S. Typis F. Mucun’r. Proflantapud R. S c o T r, Bibiiopolam Londinenfem. Mngrxxm 0.1”.3 ( 3: çj 2’ x î (,,si i t Q. l Cxm I . &t . x è. " n: . l .A I V( Il T . Bayeflnhe Staatsmbnmmk München 1L1, u s "En I a D. JOSEPHQ . W I LL’IAM’S O N; ÎL- Eæmn Jante, sin E N133] M o CAROLO n. MA G. BRIT. nunc. ET me. REGI ’ A CONSILIIS INTE RIORI B u s, ET A SECRETIS STATuS. - v j: 4min me, VIR . 510,3; L ARIS SI M E, ’ L:Â- pruneau tua , magna nué (9* diminua. Sparte ma; mollo mec merito, defiendifli etiam ad mp5 beuwolentiâ, qué Gentir a buju; r Epifiola Dcdicatoriaf lmjm (9° aliarum litqratos kami; ne: compleà’eris. Neèfiaem, nec cogitationem quidam fbjw’, alignant?! aliquz’d mais beneficii: unqmzm rÏOnendi 5- neque .enim patiebatur i autfbrt’unæ TUÆ. magnitudo, mit maze angufiia.’ Non ’cefi .interim jufiâ debitâq; prédication vubiq; teflari tannin: Ïibz’ debere me, quantum fermé homo bomini ,potefl.-Ïugi bâc(nullâ aliâ de cap) t gratitua’z’nir mEÆ’ figmficandæ cura - » adduôîus, Nomini’ Tuo 1703 li- bella: infaripfi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greco-Roman East: Politics, Culture, Society, Volume XXXI - Edited by Stephen Colvin Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521828759 - The Greco-Roman East: Politics, Culture, Society, Volume XXXI - Edited by Stephen Colvin Index More information Index Abydenus 187 Aphrodisias (Caria) Achaean League 146, 148 sympoliteia with Plarasa 162–3, 172, 179 Achaeans Aphrodite in foundation of Soloi 184 Stratonikis 153 Achaios 149 Apollo 167, 173, 226 adlectio 111 Lairbenos 4, Lyrboton 36, Tarsios 5, Tiamos Aelius Ponticus 102, 103, 116 22 Aetolian League 146, 148 Lycian 58–9 Agatharchides (FGrHist 86 F16) Apollodoros Metrophanes (Miletos) 166 Aigai (Cilicia) 206 Apollonia (Crete) 148 Akalissos (Lycia) 171 Apollonis (Lydia) 149 akathartia see purity Apollonos Hieron (Lydia) 4 Akmonia 4 Arados (Phoenicia) 205 Al Mina 186 Aramaic Aleppo/Beroea 124 used (written) in Cilicia 190, 192, 195–6 Alexander the Great 156 Aratus 200, 206 southern Asia Minor, campaign 198 arbitration 32 Alexander Polyhistor 187 archiatros 100, 101, 103, 107 Alexandreia (Troas) 150 architecture alphabet Greek influence at Dura 121 Greek 45; place of adaptation 190–1 Parthian 132 Lycian 45 Argos Phrygian 191 mythological (kinship) ties with Amos (Rhodian Peraia) 177 Cilicia 198–9; Aigai 206; Soloi 195; Amphilochos 183–4, 195 Tarsos 184, 206 Anatolian languages Aristotle, on solecism 181 disappearance 203–4; see individual Arrian (Anab. 1.26–2.5) 197, 202 languages Arsinoe (Cilicia) 199 Anchialos (Cilicia) Artemis 21, 60–61 (?), 166, 226 foundation by ‘Sardanapalus’ 198 Pergaia 41 Antigonos Monophthalmos 150, 162, 171, Arykanda (Lycia) 178 sympoliteia with Tragalassa Antioch
    [Show full text]
  • Aparchai and Phoroi: a New Commented Edition of the Athenian
    Thèse de doctorat présentée à la Faculté des Lettres de l'Université de Fribourg (Suisse) Aparchai and Phoroi A New Commented Edition of the Athenian Tribute Quota Lists and Assessment Decrees Part I : Text Björn Paarmann (Danemark) 2007 Contents Preface 3 Introduction 7 Research History 16 The Tribute Lists as a Historical Source 37 Chapter 1. The Purpose of the Tribute Lists 40 1.1 The Tribute Quota Lists 40 1.1.1 Archives or Symbols? 40 1.1.2 Archives? 40 1.1.2 Accounts? 42 1.1.3 Votives? 43 1.1.4 Conclusion 50 1.2 The Assessment Decrees 52 1.3. Conclusion: Θεοί and θεδι 53 Chapter 2. The Geographical Distribution of the Ethnics 55 2.1 The Organisation of the Quota Lists 55 2.2 The Interpretation of the Data 58 2.3 Conclusion 63 Chapter 3. Tribute Amount and the Size of the Pokis 64 3.1 Tribute Amount and Surface Area 64 3.2 Examination of the Evidence 73 3.3 Conclusion 77 Chapter 4. Ethnics and Toponyms in the Tribute Lists 78 Conclusion: On the Shoulders of Giants 87 Future Perspectives 91 Appendix: Size of the Members of the Delian League 92 Bibliography 97 Plates 126 Preface A new edition of the tribute quota lists and assessment decrees needs, if not an excuse, then perhaps at least an explanation. Considering the primary importance of these historical sources, it is astonishing how little attention has been paid to the way they have been edited by Meritt, McGregor and Wade-Gery in The Athenian Tnbute Lists (ATL) I-IV from 1939-1953 and by Meritt in Inscnptiones Graecae (IG I3) 254-291 from 1981 during the last several decades.1 This negligence on the part of contemporary scholars, both ancient historians and, more surprisingly, also Greek epigraphists, stands in sharp contrast to the central place the lists take in academic articles, monographs and history books dealing with Greek history of the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Boehm-City and Empire.Indd 6 O E H M - C I T Y
    Introduction Sometime between 311 and 306 bce, Antigonos the One-Eyed compelled the polis of Skepsis to join in the foundation of a new coastal metropolis, Antigoneia Troas, along with several other major cities of the region.1 Situated in the rich agricultural basin of the Skamandros River, at the foot of Mount Ida in the interior of the cen- tral Troad, Skepsis was roughly sixty kilometers (thirty-seven miles) from the urban center of Antigoneia along modern routes. Th e city, which had identifi ed as Ionian since its incorporation of settlers fl eeing the destruction of Miletos in 494, unwillingly joined the union alongside its hated neighbor across the Skamandros, the Aiolian polis Kebren.2 Antigonos’s synoikism was designed to consolidate his hold on the region in the wake of the peace of 311, as the rival heirs of Alexander’s empire took advantage of the cessation in hostilities to stabilize their emerging territorial kingdoms and prepare for the next round of confl ict. Th e terms of this famous peace are most fully known from a fragmentary copy of a letter from Antigonos to Skepsis, in which he announces the settlement and professes to assent to the less palatable conditions of the agreement because he “was ambi- tious” (philotimesthai, l. 21) to secure the freedom and autonomy of the Greeks in his lifetime.3 Th e vaguely worded settlement was formalized through oaths requir- ing the Greek cities under Antigonos’s control to abide by its terms. Th e letter 1. Strabo 13.1.52. For a full discussion of the synoikism, see ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 61 Ephesus Compiled by C
    Map 61 Ephesus Compiled by C. Foss and G. Reger (islands), 1994 Introduction The continental part of the map comprises three distinct geographic regions: the coasts of Ionia and Caria, the Maeander valley, and the mountainous hinterland of Caria. The coastal region, settled by Greeks in their first great expansion in the Iron Age, became the site of major cities and many smaller settlements along its deeply indented coastline. The excavators of Ephesus and Miletus have long surveyed the regions of those cities, and other classical scholars have investigated the rest of Ionia. The Ionian coast has seen great physical changes since antiquity. The vast quantities of alluvium deposited by the R. Maeander have made the ancient port of Ephesus an inland town, and turned the former Gulf of Latmos near Miletus into a lake (inset and E2). The Carian coast, with its numerous small ports, is well known thanks to the researches of Bean and Fraser. The broad Maeander valley, which divides Ionia from Caria, always played a major role in the economy of the region with its fertility and the communication it provided between coast and interior. It has not been systematically surveyed. The river’s tributaries offered an outlet for the scattered settlements in the basins and plateaus of the heavily forested interior of Caria. Much of this region, as well as many parts of neighboring ones, was carefully explored by Louis Robert. The map omits Carian sites for which no Greek name is attested; for these, see Radt (1970). For unnamed village sites also not marked, see Marchese (1989, 147-54).
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1997
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 13 | 2000 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1997 Angelos Chaniotis and Joannis Mylonopoulos Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/1300 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.1300 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2000 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis and Joannis Mylonopoulos, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1997 », Kernos [Online], 13 | 2000, Online since 21 April 2011, connection on 16 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/1300 Kernos Kernos, 13 (2000), p. 127-237. Epigraphie Bulletin for Greek Religion 1997 (EBGR 1997) The eleventh issue of the BBGR deals primarily with the epigraphic harvest of 1997. Although my long time collaborator Eftychia Stavrianopoulou has been unable to contribute lemmata this year due to other responsibilities, we have been able to cover the majority of the publications of 1997 and to close many of the gaps left in previous issues; thus, this bulletin is the longest so far. We have been focusing on riew epigraphic finds, new interpretations of inscriptions, and epigraphical corpora, but we have also summarized sorne of the religious studies which are based primarily on the epigraphic material; we have also included sorne articles which present or discuss important papyrological sources. Next year, we hope with the help of E. Stavrianopoulou not only to include more addenda to earlier issues, but also to reduce the chronological gap between the publication of a book or an article and its presentation in this bulletin.
    [Show full text]
  • Festival Networks: Stratonikeia and the Sanctuary of Hekate at Lagina
    chapter 5 Festival Networks: Stratonikeia and the Sanctuary of Hekate at Lagina In the two previous chapters, we saw how monumental sanctuaries in the civic territory of Mylasa could exhibit very different kinds of relationships with the polis: Labraunda was politically critical for both its strategic location and the symbolic capital of Zeus Labraundos among the wider population. By stark contrast, the sanctuary of the Karian god Sinuri played a central role in the social cohesion of its local community, giving us a microcosmic view of the aggregate polis. This chapter and the next will explore the urban dynamics of two other major sanctuaries in Karia, both of which found themselves within the territory of Mylasa’s rising neighbor, the polis of Stratonikeia, roughly 30 kilometers to the east. Stratonikeia, a Hellenistic foundation, came to absorb the older sanctuaries of Hekate at Lagina, some eight kilometers north-northwest of the city’s cen- ter, and Zeus at Panamara, roughly ten kilometers to the southeast (Figure 5.1). A closer examination of this development at each sanctuary will reveal more of the dynamics in the relationship between a country sanctuary and a com- posite polis. In this case, both sanctuaries ultimately served to foster internal social cohesion but also to establish a wider regional identity. Different from Mylasa, Stratonikeia was a new arrival in the Hellenistic era and both shrines appear to have been pivotal in consolidating the incorporated communities but also in the positioning of the polis on the regional and global map. Nonetheless, there are two important points of comparison between the younger polis and Mylasa, besides their mutual border and the possession of two major sanctuaries in their respective territories: both poleis were made up of a number of ancient communities, and both were located near the home sanctuary of a Karian federation – for Stratonikeia this was the sanctuary of Zeus Chrysaoreus.
    [Show full text]
  • Abgekürzt Zitierte Literatur
    ABGEKÜRZT ZITIERTE LITERATUR AA Archäologischer Anzeiger ABSA The Annual of the British School at Athens ACO Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum AKARCA, Milâs A2k dil und Turhan AKARCA, Milâs. Co/rafyas , tarihi ve arkeolojisi. 0stanbul 1954. ANMED Anadolu Akdenizi Arkeoloji Haberleri. News of Archaeology from ANATOLIA’S MEDITER- RANEAN AREAS Annuario Annuario della R. Scuola Archeologica di Atene e delle Missioni Italiane in Oriente. Bergamo. Aphrodisias V C. RATTÉ – P. DE STAEBLER (Hrsg.), Aphrodisias V. The Aphrodisias Regional Survey. Mainz/Darmstadt 2012. AREL, Cihano/lu Ayda AREL, Une famille des notables de la région d’Ayd n: les Cihano/lu et l’architecture. Anato- lia Moderna – Yeni Anadolu 8 (1999) 239–274. AST Aratrma Sonuçlar Toplants BCH Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique BEAN, Maeander G. E. BEAN, Turkey beyond the Maeander. London 1971. BEAN – COOK, G. E. BEAN – J. M. COOK, Carian Coast The Carian Coast III. ABSA 52 (1957) 58–146. BEAN – COOK, Cnidia G. E. BEAN – J. M. COOK, The Cnidia. ABSA 47 (1952) 171–212. BEAN – COOK, G. E. BEAN – J. M. COOK, Halicarnassus Peninsula The Halicarnassus Peninsula. ABSA 50 (1955) 85–169. BENOIT – PIEROBON BENOIT, J. BENOIT – Raffaella PIEROBON BENOIT, Il territorio a N di Iasos: ricognizioni 1988, in: Sinus Territorio a N di Iasos Iasius I.3., 902–919. BENOIT – PIEROBON BENOIT – J. BENOIT – Raffaella PIEROBON BENOIT – G. RAGONE, Il territorio a N di Iasos, in: Sinus RAGONE, Territorio a N di Iasos Iasius I.1., 865–871. BLÜMEL, Iasos W. BLÜMEL, Die Inschriften von Iasos I–II (IK 28, 1–2). Bonn 1985. BLÜMEL, Mylasa W. BLÜMEL, Die Inschriften von Mylasa I–II (IK 34, 35).
    [Show full text]
  • Inscriptions and Memory in the Temples of Late Antique Greece and Asia Minor
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The Writing On The Wall: Inscriptions And Memory In The Temples Of Late Antique Greece And Asia Minor Anna Marie Sitz University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Classics Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Sitz, Anna Marie, "The Writing On The Wall: Inscriptions And Memory In The Temples Of Late Antique Greece And Asia Minor" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2886. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2886 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2886 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Writing On The Wall: Inscriptions And Memory In The Temples Of Late Antique Greece And Asia Minor Abstract This dissertation documents late antique (fourth to seventh century CE) Christian responses to earlier, pagan inscriptions at sanctuaries, as seen in the archaeological record. I argue that Christians in Greece and Asia Minor neither ignored nor unthinkingly destroyed older inscriptions, but rather were generally tolerant toward these legible reminders of the pagan past, selectively editing them only occasionally. In order to clarify the types of inscriptions that Christians encountered on temple walls and architraves, I have assembled the first catalog of inscriptions on temples, which er veals that the majority of texts inscribed on sacred structures between the seventh century BCE and the third century CE were, counterintuitively, not about religion, but rather civic matters: political privileges, economic/territorial rights, and elite social structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Antik Çağda Karia Bölgesinde Bal Honey in the Karia Region in Antiquity
    Çevrimiçi Tematik Türkoloji Dergisi ACTA TURCICA Online Thematic Journal of Turkic Studies www.actaturcica.com Yıl III, Sayı 1/1, Ocak 2011 “Kültürümüzde Arıcılık”, Editörler: Emine Gürsoy Naskali, Hilal Oytun Altun Antik Çağda Karia Bölgesinde Bal Honey in the Karia Region in Antiquity Dinçer Savaş Lenger* Özet: Bugün büyük bir kısmı Muğla ili sınırları içerisinde kalan Karia bölgesi antikçağın en önemli bal üretim merkezlerinden biridir. Antik kaynaklar, epigrafik ve arkeolojik veriler bize Kalymnos ve Rhodos adaları; Theangela, Knidos, Pidasa ve Olymos kentlerinde arıcılık yapıldığı bilgisini vermektedir. Yüksek kalitesi sayesinde bölge balı, Karia’nın önemli bir ihraç ürünlerinden biri olmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Arıcılık, Bal, Karia, Kalymnos, Rhodos, Theangela, Knidos, Pidasa, Olymos, Antikçağ. Abstract: Caria which is within the borders of the actual province of Muğla was one of the most important honey production centers in ancient time. Ancient sources, epigraphic and archaeological searches give us information about apiculture activities on the islands of Kalymnos, Rhodos and in the cities of Theangela, Knidos, Pidasa and Olymos. The honey of this region was of high quality and was one of the important export products of Caria. Keywords: Apiculture, Honey, Caria, Kalymnos, Rhodos, Theangela, Knidos, Pidasa, Olymos, Ancient time. Prehistorik çağlardan itibaren bal, insanoğlunun en önemli beslenme kaynaklarından biri olmuştur. Kolay hazmedilebilir değerli bir karbonhidrat kaynağı olarak fiziksel ve zihinsel gücü arttıran bal, bileşeninde yer alan yüksek orandaki früktoz ve glikoz sayesinde * Dr. Dinçer Savaş Lenger, Nümizmat, Araştırmacı, İstanbul. [email protected] 28 antikçağ mutfağında özellikle tatlandırıcı olarak kabul görmüştür.1 Birçok yemek tarifine çeşni olarak eklenen bal, özellikle hamur işlerinde, tatlı ve ekmek yapımında kullanılan temel malzemelerden biridir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Double Axe and Approaching the Question of Karian-Kretan Interaction
    Karia and Krete: a study in social and cultural interaction Naomi H Carless Unwin UCL DPhil History 1 I, Naomi H Carless Unwin, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract My thesis focuses on social and cultural interaction between Karia (in south western Anatolia) and Krete, over a long time span; from the Bronze Age to the Roman period. A persistent tradition existed in antiquity linking the Karians with Krete; this was mirrored in civic mythologies in Karia, as well as in cults and toponyms. My research aims to construct a new framework in which to read these traditions. The way in which a community ‘remembered’ its past was not an objective view of history; traditions were transmitted because they were considered to reflect something about a society. The persistence of a Kretan link within Karian mythologies and cults indicates that Krete was ‘good to think with’ even (or especially) during a period when Karia itself was undergoing changes (becoming, in a sense, both ‘de-Karianized’ and ‘Hellenized’). I focus on the late Classical and Hellenistic periods, from which most of our source material derives. The relevance of a shared past is considered in light of actual contacts between the two regions: diplomatic, economic, cultural and military. Against the prevailing orthodoxy, which maintains that traditions of earlier contacts, affinities and kinship between peoples from different parts of the Mediterranean were largely constructs of later periods, I take seriously the origins of such traditions and explore how the networks that linked Minoan Krete with Anatolia could have left a residuum in later conceptualisations of regional history.
    [Show full text]