DOCSLIB.ORG

Camp Elizabeth, Sterling County, Texas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camp Elizabeth, Sterling County, Texas Camp Elizabeth, Sterling County, Texas: . An Archaeological and Archival Investigation of a u.s. Army Subpost, and Evidence Supporting Its Use by the Military and "Buffalo Soldiers 11 Maureen Brown, Jose E. Zapata, and Bruce K. Moses with contributions by Anne A. Fox, C. Britt Bousman, I. Waymle Cox, and Cynthia L. Tennis Sponsored by: San Angelo District Texas Department of Transportation Archaeological Survey Report, No. 267 Center for Archaeological Research The University of Texas at San Antonio 1998 Camp Elizabeth, Sterling County, Texas: An Archaeological and Archival Investigation of a U.S. Army Subpost, and Evidence Supporting Its Use by the Military and "Buffalo Soldiers" Maureen Brown, Jose E. Zapata, and Bruce K. Moses with contributions by Anne A. Fox, C. Britt Bousman, L Waynne Cox, and Cynthia L. Tennis Robert J. Hard and C. Britt Bousman Principal Investigators Texas Antiquities Permit No. 1866 Archaeological Survey Report, No. 267 Center for Archaeological Research The University of Texas at San Antonio ©copyright 1998 The following information is provided in accordance with the General Rules of Practice and Procedure, Chapter 41.11 (Investigative Reports), Texas Antiquities Committee: 1. Type of investigation: Archaeological and archival mitigation 2. Project name: Camp Elizabeth 3. County: Sterling 4. Principal investigator: Robert J. Hard and C. Britt Bousman 5. Name and location of sponsoring agency: Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas 78701 6. Texas Antiquities Permit No.: 1866 7. Published by the Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 6900 N. Loop 1604 W., San Antonio, Texas 78249-0658, 1998 A list of publications offered by the Center for Archaeological Research is available. Call (210) 458-4378; write to the Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 6900 N. Loop 1604 W., San Antonio, Texas 78249-0658; e-mail to [email protected]; or visit CAR's web site at http://www.csbs.utsa.edu/researchlcar. Abstract The Center for Archaeological Research (CAR) of The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) engaged in a two-phase contract with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to complete archaeological and archival investigations of the Camp at the Head of the North Concho (41 STIll). The camp, known locally as Camp Elizabeth, was a military outpost of Fort Concho in San Angelo, Texas, and is now located approximately nine miles northwest of Sterling City along V.S. Highway 87. The camp lies within the right-of-way along V.S. 87 that will be impacted by a highway improvement project. CAR's archaeological and archival investigations confirmed the presence of the former military occupation of the camp during the late-nineteenth century. No evidence supporting a legendary presence of the Texas Rangers at Camp Elizabeth was found. Archival evidence that the Buffalo Soldiers, African-American troops, were stationed at Camp Elizabeth is presented. Archaeological excavations identified numerous features, including a farrier's shop. Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ i List of Figures .................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1: Introduction Maureen Brown ............................................................................. '" .................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Project Background Bruce K. Moses, Cynthia L. Tennis, and Maureen Brown ................................................................... 5 Chapter 3: Research Issues Maureen Brown and Jose E. Zapata ................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 4: Archival Investigations Jose E. Zapata, 1. Waynne Cox, and C. Britt Bousman ...................................................................... 19 Chapter 5: Archaeological Investigations Maureen Brown, Bruce K. Moses, and Jose E. Zapata ...................................................................... 47 Chapter 6: Conclusions and Interpretations Maureen Brown, Anne A. Fox, Bruce K. Moses, Jose E. Zapata, and C. Britt Bousma .................... 81 References Cited ............................................................................................................................. 102 Appendix A: 1870 and 1880 Census Data .................................................................................... 112 Appendix B: Artifact Data ............................................................................................................................ 131 11 Figures 1-1. Project location ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1-2. Detail of project location .............................................................................................................................. 2 1-3. Project area, looking north/northwest. ......................................................................................................... 3 2-1. Vegetation zones in the vicinity of the project area ..................................................................................... 7 2-2. Vegetation in the project area ....................................................................................................................... 7 2-3. Plan of Camp Elizabeth as remembered by Kellis ..................................................................................... 12 2-4. TxDOT's investigations at 41ST111 .......................................................................................................... 14 4-1. Texas forts and selected communities in 1855 ........................................................................................... 20 4-2. Texas forts and selected communities in 1870 ........................................................................................... 24 4-3. Fort Concho and outposts, ca. 1875 ........................................................................................................... 35 4-4. Ft. Concho Scout Report map of the location of Camp at the Head of the North Concho ........................ 37 4-5. Texas frontier railroads and towns, ca. 1890 ............................................................................................. 41 4-6. Forts occupied by the Buffalo Soldiers ...................................................................................................... 42 4-7. Emblem of the 10th Cavalry. National Archives ....................................................................................... 43 4-8. Buffalo Soldiers of the 25th Infantry.......................................................................................................... 45 5-1. Site map showing grid in 41ST111 project area, TxDOT previous investigations, CAR's Phase I and II investigations ....................................................................................................................... 48 5-2. Site map showing TxDOTs identified Features 1-5 and CAR's excavated units within Features 1 (U77-86, and U89) and Feature 4 (U87-88) .............................................................................................. 50 5-3. Unit 73 (12 inches bs) showing interior northwest comer of Feature 1. ................................................... 53 5-4. Unit 73, profile of north wall of Feature 1 within U73 .............................................................................. 54 5-5. Feature 1, plan map .................................................................................................................................... 55 5-6. Feature 1 after excavations (looking east) ................................................................................................. 56 5-7. Feature 1, exposure of north and west walls (looking southeast) .............................................................. 56 5-8. Feature 1, exposure of the east wall and the northeast comer (looking south) ......................................... 57 5-9. Bladed area excavations showing the locations of identified anomalies A1-A70 .................................... 60 5-10. Anomalies and Features 6 and 7 identified within Bladed Area 1........................................................... 63 5-11. Anomalies and Features 5 and 9 identified within Bladed Area 2 ........................................................... 65 5-12. A29: Orange soil concentration ............................................................................................................... 66 5-13. A30: 12d cut nail with grommet and window glass ................................................................................. 66 5-14. Anomalies and Features 2, 3, 4, and 10 identified within Bladed Area 3 ................................................ 67 5-15. Anomalies and Features 1, 11, 12, and 13 within Bladed Area 4 ............................................................ 69 5-16.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fort Concho Historical Trail
    FORT CONCHO HISTORICAL TRAIL Brought to you by Concho Valley Council Boy Scouts of America FORT CONCHO HISTORICAL TRAIL Fort Concho was established on December 4, 1867, after the army had to abandon Fort Chadbourne (located north of what is now Bronte, Texas) for lack of good water. The new fort was located at the junction of the North and South Concho Rivers. The fort consisted of some forty buildings and was constructed of native limestone. Fort Concho was closed in June 1889 after having served this area for some twenty-two years. Today, the fort is a National Historical Landmark. The Fort Concho Historical Trail takes you not only through this Fort, but also along some of the streets of the settlement of Santa Angela, now San Angelo that was developed to serve the needs of the men who were stationed at the Fort. In 1870, a trader and promoter named Bart DeWitt bought 320 acres of land for $1.00 an acre, marked off town lots and offered them for sale. The town of Santa Angela grew from just a few people to the thriving city it is today. On the trail you will take downtown, you will see some of the old buildings of this early community as well as some of the other historical areas along the Concho River. The Concho River was named from the mussel shells found in the river. THOSE ELIGIBLE TO HIKE THE TRAIL All members of the Boy Scouts of America, the Girl Scouts USA and all adults, parents and Scouters who go with them, are eligible to hike the trail and earn the Fort Concho Historical Trail Patch if they follow the trail requirements as listed.
    [Show full text]
  • D. G. & D. A. Sanford
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 4-5-1878 D. G. & D. A. Sanford. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Rep. No. 465, 45th Cong., 2nd Sess. (1878) This House Report is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 45TH CONGREss, } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. REPORT 2d Session. { No. 465. D. G. & D. A. SANFORD. APRIL 5, 1878.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole Honse and ordered to be printed. Mr. MORGAN, from the Committee on Indian Affairs, submitted the fol­ lowing REPORT: [To accompany bill H. R. 4241.] The Committee on Indian Affairs, to whom was referred the petition for the relief of D. G. & D. A. Sanford, report: That Messrs. D. G. & D. A. Sanford have been engaged for years as cattle-drivers, and on or about the 12th day of June, 1872, they started from ~he county of San Saba, in Texas, with 2, 782 head of cattle for California. They also had with them 38 horses and mules, 4 yoke of oxen, and 2 wagons, which contained their provisions and outfit.
    [Show full text]
  • Concho River & Upper Colorado River Basins
    CONCHO RIVER & UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASINS Brush Control Feasibility Study Prepared By The: UPPER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY In Cooperation with TEXAS STATE SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION BOARD and TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY December 2000 Cover Photograph: Rocky Creek located in Irion County, Texas following restoration though a comprehensive brush control program. Photo courtesy of United States Natural Resources Conservation Services. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The preparation of this report is the result of action by many state, federal and local entities and of many individuals dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of water resources within the State of Texas. This report is one of several funded by the Legislature of Texas to be implemented by the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board during FYE2000. We commend the Texas Legislature for its’ extraordinary insight and boldness in moving ahead with planning that will be critical to water supply provision in future decades. In particular, the efforts of State Representative Robert Junell are especially recognized for his vision in coordinating the initial feasibility study conducted on the North Concho River and his support for studies of additional watershed basins in Texas. The following individuals are recognized as having made substantial contributions to this study and preparation of this report: Arlan Youngblood Ben Wilde Bill Tullos Billy Williams Bob Buckley Bob Jennings Bob Northcutt Brent Murphy C. Wade Clifton C.J. Robinson Carl Schlinke David Wilson Don Davis Eddy Spurgin Edwin Garner Gary Askins Tommy Morrison Woody Anderson Gary Grogan Howard Morrison J.P. Bach James Moore Jessie Whitlow Jimmy Sterling Joe Dean Weatherby Joe Funk John Anderson John Walker Johnny Oswald Keith Collom Kevin Spreen Kevin Wagner Lad Lithicum Lisa Barker Marjorie Mathis Max S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Your Next Trip
    CHARLES AND MARY ANN GOODNIGHT RANCH STATE HISTORIC SITE, GOODNIGHT PRESERVE THE FUTURE By visiting these historic sites, you are helping the Texas Historical Commission preserve the past. Please be mindful of fragile historic artifacts and respectful of historic structures. We want to ensure their preservation for the enjoyment of future generations. JOIN US Support the preservation of these special places. Consider making a donation to support ongoing preservation and education efforts at our sites at thcfriends.org. Many of our sites offer indoor and outdoor facility rentals for weddings, meetings, and special events. Contact the site for more information. SEE THE SITES From western forts and adobe structures to Victorian mansions and pivotal battlegrounds, the Texas Historical Commission’s state historic sites illustrate the breadth of Texas history. Plan Your Next Trip texashistoricsites.com 1 Acton HISTORIC15 Kreische BrSITESewery DIVISION22 National Museum of the Pacific War 2 Barrington Plantation Texas16 Landmark Historical Inn Commission23 Old Socorro Mission 3 Caddo Mounds P.O.17 BoxLevi 12276,Jordan Plantatio Austin,n TX 7871124 Palmito Ranch Battleground 4 Casa Navarro 18 Lipantitla512-463-7948n 25 Port Isabel Lighthouse 5 Confederate Reunion Grounds [email protected] Magon Home 26 Sabine Pass Battleground 6 Eisenhower Birthplace 20 Mission Dolores 27 Sam Bell Maxey House 7 Fannin Battleground 21 Monument HIll 28 Sam Rayburn House 8 Fanthorp Inn 29 San Felipe de Austin 9 Fort Grin 30 San Jacinto Battleground and
    [Show full text]
  • FRIENDS of THC BOARD of DIRECTORS Name Address City State Zip Work Home Mobile Email Email Code Killis P
    FRIENDS OF THC BOARD OF DIRECTORS Name Address City State Zip Work Home Mobile Email Email Code Killis P. Almond 342 Wilkens San TX 78210 210-532-3212 512-532-3212 [email protected] Avenue Antonio Peggy Cope Bailey 3023 Chevy Houston TX 77019 713-523-4552 713-301-7846 [email protected] Chase Drive Jane Barnhill 4800 Old Brenham TX 77833 979-836-6717 [email protected] Chappell Hill Road Jan Felts Bullock 3001 Gilbert Austin TX 78703 512-499-0624 512-970-5719 [email protected] Street Diane D. Bumpas 5306 Surrey Dallas TX 75209 214-350-1582 [email protected] Circle Lareatha H. Clay 1411 Pecos Dallas TX 75204 214-914-8137 [email protected] [email protected] Street Dianne Duncan Tucker 2199 Troon Houston TX 77019 713-524-5298 713-824-6708 [email protected] Road Sarita Hixon 3412 Houston TX 77027 713-622-9024 713-805-1697 [email protected] Meadowlake Lane Lewis A. Jones 601 Clark Cove Buda TX 78610 512-312-2872 512-657-3120 [email protected] Harriet Latimer 9 Bash Place Houston TX 77027 713-526-5397 [email protected] John Mayfield 3824 Avenue F Austin TX 78751 512-322-9207 512-482-0509 512-750-6448 [email protected] Lynn McBee 3912 Miramar Dallas TX 75205 214-707-7065 [email protected] [email protected] Avenue Bonnie McKee P.O. Box 120 Saint Jo TX 76265 940-995-2349 214-803-6635 [email protected] John L. Nau P.O. Box 2743 Houston TX 77252 713-855-6330 [email protected] [email protected] Virginia S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT: [To Accompany Bill H
    45TH CONGREss, } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. REPORT 2d Session. { No. 465. D. G. & D. A. SANFORD. APRIL 5, 1878.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole Honse and ordered to be printed. Mr. MORGAN, from the Committee on Indian Affairs, submitted the fol­ lowing REPORT: [To accompany bill H. R. 4241.] The Committee on Indian Affairs, to whom was referred the petition for the relief of D. G. & D. A. Sanford, report: That Messrs. D. G. & D. A. Sanford have been engaged for years as cattle-drivers, and on or about the 12th day of June, 1872, they started from ~he county of San Saba, in Texas, with 2, 782 head of cattle for California. They also had with them 38 horses and mules, 4 yoke of oxen, and 2 wagons, which contained their provisions and outfit. On · the lOth day of July they applied to Maj. John P. Hatch, com­ manding United States troops at Fort Concho, for a military escort across the Staked Plains. The escort was promised them on their arri­ val at the fort, but upon their arrival, that .officer advised them to pro­ ceed with ·their herd, and, as one of the petitioners swears, promised them an escort which would overtake them on· the 13th. They, under this advice, drove their herd about twelve miles and went into camp to await the arrival of the promised escort, when at about one o'clock on the morning of the 14th they were attacked by a large body of India,ns, a part of whom drove in the herders, while the others drove off the stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University Number 265 21 December 2006
    Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University Number 265 21 December 2006 THE MAMMALS OF SAN ANGELO STATE PARK, TOM GREEN COUNTY, TEXAS JOEL G. BRANT, ROBERT C. DOWLER, AND CARLA E. EBELING ABSTRACT A survey of the mammalian fauna of San Angelo State Park, Tom Green County, Texas, began in April 1999 and includes data collected through November 2005. Thirty-one species of native mammals, representing 7 orders and 18 families, were verified at the state park. The mammalian fauna at the state park is composed primarily of western Edwards Plateau mam- mals, which include many Chihuahuan species, and mammals with widespread distributions. The most abundant species of small mammal at the state park were Neotoma micropus and Peromyscus maniculatus. The total trap success for this study (1.5%) was lower than expected and may reflect the drought conditions experienced in this area during the study period. Key words: Edwards Plateau, mammal survey, San Angelo State Park, Texas, Tom Green County, zoogeography INTRODUCTION San Angelo State Park (SASP) is located about tributaries, and the North Concho River with its asso- 10 km (6 mi.) west of San Angelo in Tom Green ciated tributaries and O. C. Fisher Reservoir (Fig. 1). County, Texas, and is situated around O. C. Fisher The North Concho River creates a dispersal corridor Reservoir and the North Concho River (Figs. 1 and for eastern species to move west into west-central 2). This area is an ecotonal zone at the junction of Texas. two major biotic regions in Texas, the Edwards Pla- teau (Balconian) to the south and the Rolling Plains to The soils of SASP are composed mostly of the north (Blair 1950).
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Forts Trail Region
    CatchCatch thethe PioPionneereer SpiritSpirit estern military posts composed of wood and While millions of buffalo still roamed the Great stone structures were grouped around an Plains in the 1870s, underpinning the Plains Indian open parade ground. Buildings typically way of life, the systematic slaughter of the animals had included separate officer and enlisted troop decimated the vast southern herd in Texas by the time housing, a hospital and morgue, a bakery and the first railroads arrived in the 1880s. Buffalo bones sutler’s store (provisions), horse stables and still littered the area and railroads proved a boon to storehouses. Troops used these remote outposts to the bone trade with eastern markets for use in the launch, and recuperate from, periodic patrols across production of buttons, meal and calcium phosphate. the immense Southern Plains. The Army had other motivations. It encouraged Settlements often sprang up near forts for safety the kill-off as a way to drive Plains Indians onto and Army contract work. Many were dangerous places reservations. Comanches, Kiowas and Kiowa Apaches with desperate characters. responded with raids on settlements, wagon trains and troop movements, sometimes kidnapping individuals and stealing horses and supplies. Soldiers stationed at frontier forts launched a relentless military campaign, the Red River War of 1874–75, which eventually forced Experience the region’s dramatic the state’s last free Native Americans onto reservations in present-day Oklahoma. past through historic sites, museums and courthouses — as well as historic downtowns offering unique shopping, dining and entertainment. ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ ★★ 2 The westward push of settlements also relocated During World War II, the vast land proved perfect cattle drives bound for railheads in Kansas and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • San Angelo Project History
    San Angelo Project Jennifer E. Zuniga Bureau of Reclamation 1999 Table of Contents The San Angelo Project.........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................7 Post Construction History ................................................12 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................16 Project Benefits and Use of Project Water ...................................16 Conclusion............................................................17 About the Author .............................................................17 Bibliography ................................................................18 Archival and Manuscript Collections .......................................18 Government Documents .................................................18 Articles...............................................................18 Books ................................................................18 Index ......................................................................19 1 The San Angelo Project The San Angelo Project is a multipurpose project in the Concho River Basin of west- central Texas. In a region historically known for intermittent droughts and floods, the project provides protection against both weather extremes.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Guide.Pub
    Gingerbread House & Discover Christmas Using your Five Senses TB Cookie Display Miss Birdie’s Tea Party Santa’s House Santa's Workshop Hut Commissary Ruffini Hospital “Frontier House” House Horse Rides Merchants Petting Zoo Train Lions Pancakes with Santa (Sat) Headquarters Stop ATM Quartermaster A Night at the Stables (Sat) Student Art Show Food Photographs with Santa Cowboy Chuckwagon Breakfast (Sun) Court Cowboy Church Service (Sun) Barracks 6 Mess Hall 6 Chapel “Sutlers’ Christmas” Entertainment & Services Merchants “Winter OQ 9 ”Mexican Rendezvous” Merchants Mess Hall 5 Barracks 5 House” Stables Exhibits ”Czech House” OQ 8 Merchants Boot Camp OQ 7 Indian Village Staff Offices ”German OQ 6 Parade Ground House” Merchants OQ 5 Barracks 2 Living (Ruins) “Buffalo Soldiers’ Christmas” Nativity Merchants Verizon/GTE OQ 4 Volunteer Base Ball Danner Museum Parking Be Sure to See the Exhibits Kettle Corn Historical Exhibits in OQ 3 + Chuck Wagon Old Fashioned Soda Officers’ Quarters 3 ”Officers’ Exhibits Officers’ Quarters 4 Tickets Christmas” Barracks 1 Hospital Restrooms Arc Light Entertainment Area Barracks 1 Volunteer OQ 2 Handicapped Historical Walking Tours Barracks 5 Check in Restrooms Visitor Center, Food Vendors Gift Shop & Information ”Victorian OQ 1 Bandstand House” Beverages Concho Cowboy Co. Merchants Chuck Wagon Camp Old St. Angela Handicapped Parking VISIT THESE MERCHANTS FOR ALL YOUR HOLIDAY SHOPPING OQ 1 OQ 9 Commissary Barracks 2 East Barracks 2 West Food Vendors Santa Claus Calico Apothecary English’s Photography Southwest Collections 1 of One John Mark Candles Amadeo Cuisine is coming to town Carmelite Hermits’ Kitchen Message in Mesquite Usborne Books & More Geese of a Feather Dorothy’s Creations Cristi & Ali Cuisine Gypsy Chix Rowdy Rose Boutique Fork It Over Majeza Jewelry Cleaner Mom’s Madness Vittle Barn Susan Kemper Art Barracks 6 Tracy’s Studio Lilla Rose Hair Heroes Long Horn Coffee Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Trends in Streamflow from Semiarid Rangelands
    Global Change Biology (2008) 14, 1676–1689, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01578.x Long-term trends in streamflow from semiarid rangelands: uncovering drivers of change BRADFORD P. WILCOX*, YUN HUANG* andJOHN W. WALKERw *Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA, wTexas AgriLIFE Research, San Angelo, TX 76901, USA Abstract In the last 100 years or so, desertification, degradation, and woody plant encroachment have altered huge tracts of semiarid rangelands. It is expected that the changes thus brought about significantly affect water balance in these regions; and in fact, at the headwater-catchment and smaller scales, such effects are reasonably well documented. For larger scales, however, there is surprisingly little documentation of hydrological change. In this paper, we evaluate the extent to which streamflow from large rangeland watersheds in central Texas has changed concurrent with the dramatic shifts in vegeta- tion cover (transition from pristine prairie to degraded grassland to woodland/savanna) that have taken place during the last century. Our study focused on the three watersheds that supply the major tributaries of the Concho River – those of the North Concho (3279 km2), the Middle Concho (5398 km2), and the South Concho (1070 km2). Using data from the period of record (1926–2005), we found that annual streamflow for the North Concho decreased by about 70% between 1960 and 2005. Not only did we find no downtrend in precipitation that might explain this reduced flow, we found no corre- sponding change in annual streamflow for the other two watersheds (which have more karst parent material).
    [Show full text]