Help by Environmental Zealots (Allen Chair Symposium 1996: the Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Help by Environmental Zealots (Allen Chair Symposium 1996: the Future University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 1996 Capture and Counteraction: Self- Help by Environmental Zealots (Allen Chair Symposium 1996: The uturF e of Environmental and Land-Use Regulation) James E. Krier University of Michigan Law School, [email protected] Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/243 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles Part of the Animal Law Commons, Common Law Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Krier, James E. "Capture and Counteraction: Self- Help by Environmental Zealots (Allen Chair Symposium 1996: The uturF e of Environmental and Land-Use Regulation)." U. Rich. L. Rev. 30, no. 4 (1996): 1039-54. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAPTURE AND COUNTERACTION: SELF-HELP BY ENVIRONMENTAL ZEALOTS James E. Krier* I. THE MEANING OF SELF-HELP Self-help is a largely neglected topic in American legal stud- ies.' With the exception of a survey by a group of law students published a dozen years ago,2 there appears to be little, if any- thing, in our legal literature that confronts the subject in a systematic way.3 This is so, at least, if one defines self-help as I do. To me, the term refers to any act of bypassing the formal legal system in order to get what one wants. Lest this meaning seem obvious, notice that there are alter- native definitions of self-help that view it more narrowly. One of these alternatives defines self-help to mean what it means in the large and familiar range of popular self-help books and articles that offer "how-to" guidance on matters ranging from the mundane to the metaphysical: how to do your own plumb- ing, how to be your own best friend, and so on. If we were to * Earl Warren DeLano Professor, University of Michigan Law School. An earlier version of this essay was presented as the George E. Allen Lecture at the T.C. Wil- liams School of Law, University of Richmond, during my week-long visit to the school as the George E. Allen Professor in March 1996. I am grateful to the Allen family, and to the students, staff, and faculty of the law school-Professor Michael Allan Wolf in particular-for hospitality and support. Research assistance was provided by a cluster of people during their time as students at the University of Michigan Law School. My thanks especially to Daniel Ginsberg, Eric Guidry, Stephen Ross, Kevin Toh, and Donald Wiest. 1. In contrast to the situation with respect to American law, there are a number of studies of self-help written in other languages and focused on other legal cultures. I have not consulted these for purposes of the present essay, but I intend to consider them in connection with the larger work of which this essay is a part. 2. See, Special Project, Self-Help: ExtrajudicialRights, Privileges and Remedies in Contemporary American Society, 37 VAND. L. REV. 845 (1984). 3. But see Richard A. Posner, Killing or Wounding to Protect a Property Interest, 14 J.L. & ECON. 201 (1971). Posner's article, despite its rather limited substantive reach, approaches the question of self-help in a way that illuminates the general subject, as I shall try to show. 1039 HeinOnline -- 30 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1039 1996 1040 UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LAW REVIEW [Vol. 30:1039 define self-help in this way, we would find a raft of legal liter- ature offering instruction on the preparation of one's taxes, the making of one's will, the filing of one's lawsuit, the dissolution of one's marriage, and so on, by and for oneself.4 But this gen- re is concerned only with the relatively limited question of self- help that bypasses lawyers, whereas I am concerned with the very broad matter of self-help that bypasses the formal legal system entirely. Another definition of self-help gets closer to the broad concep- tion but still manages to fall short, and in a way that proves to be instructive. An example is found in the Oxford English Dic- tionary, which, under the term "self-help," has an entry that reads: "Law. Redress of one's wrongs by one's own action, with- out recourse to legal process."5 The shortcoming of this defini- tion is its focus on the righting of wrongs. Self-help in its full- est and most significant sense entails substantially more than that, a point I can explain by reference to the rule of capture, which happens to be one of my central concerns in this essay. II. SELF-HELP AND THE RULE OF CAPTURE The rule of capture is quite clearly a self-help rule, yet it has nothing to do with redressing wrongs. Under the rule, which re- mains a significant feature of American law despite judicial and legislative modifications over the years,6 so-called fugitive or freely roaming natural resources are, while in their natural state, owned in common by members of the community at large. They remain common property until someone "captures" them by reducing them to individual possession and control, at which point they typically become that person's private property. The rule of capture is of ancient origin. It probably originated in the context of wild animals-animals ferae naturae is the 4. See, e.g., FRANK G. HOUDEK, LAW FOR THE LAYMAN: AN ANNOTATED BiBLIOG- RAPHY OF SELF-HELP LAW BOOKS (1991). Houdek's book is a loose-leaf volume, so obviously a lot of future entries are anticipated. 5. 14 OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY 922 (2d ed. 1989). 6. See generally JESSE DUKEMINIER & JAMES E. KRIER, PROPERTY 20-62 (3d ed. 1991) (discussing various aspects of the rule of capture). Some of the ideas explored in the present essay were first suggested in the cited pages of the Dukeminier & Krier course book. HeinOnline -- 30 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1040 1996 19961 CAPTURE AND COUNTERACTION 1041 pretentious legal term-that were hunted for food and other domestic purposes: waterfowl and other wild birds valued for their flesh or plumage; rabbits, mink and deer; fish and whales. Whales provide a good example of the rule of capture in opera- tion. A whale loose in the open ocean essentially belongs to everybody entitled to fish the waters-it is common proper- ty-whereas a whale fast to a whaling ship belongs, as private property, to the whaler that caught it.' Capture might be liter- al (which is to say "actual"-the whale is harpooned and tied fast to the boat), or figurative ("constructive," as lawyers put it-the whale has been mortally wounded by a harpoon from a pursuing whaler). The general point is apparent: When an ani- mal ferae naturae is killed or caught, or as good as killed or caught, it belongs to the predator who did it in, so long as pursuit of the animal has not been abandoned.8 The rule of capture was extended early on from wild animals to other resources which, though they lack a life of their own, nevertheless roam about. An example is groundwater, found in pools and streams beneath vast stretches of surface land owned as relatively small individual plots by any number of people. Under the applicable rule (since modified to some degree in some jurisdictions), each owner of overlying land had the right to drill down through his land in order to extract ("capture") the water. All of the landowners were in competition with each other.9 No one landowner had the right to exclude the others from taking water by digging wells that started on, and bot- tomed under, their own land. The water was common property until reduced to individual possession and control, at which point it, like a whale on a line, became private property. 7. "A Fast-Fish belongs to the party fast to it," as one respected authority put the matter. "A Loose-Fish is fair game for anybody who can soonest catch it." HERAiAN MELVILLE, MOBY-DICK ch. 89 (Harrison Hayford & Hershel Parker eds., W.W. Norton & Co. 1967) (1851). 8. Under the rule of capture, an animal that subsequently escapes into the wild is usually once again ferae naturae, common property up for grabs. See, e.g., RAY ANDREWS BROWN, THE LAW OF PERSONAL PROPERTY 18 (Walter B. Raushenbush ed., 3d ed. 1975). 9. See DUKEMINIER & KRIER, supra note 6, at 4041. Under the early common law rule, each owner of land over an aquifer was entitled to draw freely from the source. The rule "was in reality a rule of capture... ." RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS ch. 41, commentary at 256 (1977). HeinOnline -- 30 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1041 1996 1042 UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LAW REVIEW [Vol. 30:1039 Likening water beneath the surface of the earth to whales beneath the surface of the ocean would probably strike lay observers as a remarkably odd thing to do. But we can expect that most people, once introduced to the legal conception behind the analogy, would regard the leap from whales to water as perfectly natural and utterly logical. (Whether it was also wise is a separate question that I shall take up eventually.) And given the likening of water roaming free to wild animals roam- ing free, it is not surprising to learn that judges subsequently -extended the notion to still other fugitive resources when man- kind happened upon them and found them worth exploiting.
Recommended publications
  • Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2
    AAnniimmaallss LLiibbeerraattiioonn PPhhiilloossoopphhyy aanndd PPoolliiccyy JJoouurrnnaall VVoolluummee 55,, IIssssuuee 22 -- 22000077 Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2 2007 Edited By: Steven Best, Chief Editor ____________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell Pg. 2-28 Jewish Ethics and Nonhuman Animals Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 29-47 Deliberative Democracy, Direct Action, and Animal Advocacy Stephen D’Arcy Pg. 48-63 Should Anti-Vivisectionists Boycott Animal-Tested Medicines? Katherine Perlo Pg. 64-78 A Note on Pedagogy: Humane Education Making a Difference Piers Bierne and Meena Alagappan Pg. 79-94 BOOK REVIEWS _________________ Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, by Eric Schlosser (2005) Reviewed by Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 95-101 Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust, by Charles Patterson (2002) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 102-118 The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA, by Norm Phelps (2007) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 119-130 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume V, Issue 2, 2007 Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell, PhD It is difficult to be sat on all day, every day, by some other creature, without forming an opinion about them. On the other hand, it is perfectly possible to sit all day every day, on top of another creature and not have the slightest thought about them whatsoever. -- Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency (1988) Committed to the idea that the lives of humans and animals are inextricably linked, Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (1828–1910) promoted—through literature, essays, and letters—the animal world as another venue in which to practice concern and kindness, consequently leading to more peaceful, consonant human relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Compassion Over Killing Hom
    Compassion Over Killing Home Page http://web.archive.org/web/20010212020030/www.cok-online.org/abolit... Compassion Over Killing COK Home The Abolitionist Calender Literature Merchandise By Mike Markarian What You Can Do When I first became involved in the animal rights movement, about ten years ago, I was active with both grassroots and national groups. Our Join Us animal rights group in Buffalo, N.Y., held numerous grassroots protests at local fur stores and rodeos. And when PETA called and asked us to Links help with a demo, or when the Fund for Animals called and asked us to help with a hunt sabotage, we were more than happy to work with them. It seemed to be a very cooperative and symbiotic relationship —grassroots groups needed the national groups to provide well-researched information, literature, ready-made posters, and other materials, and the national groups needed local activists for support at local events. Years later, I work for a national group, I have been called a and I am still very active with grassroots “sell-out” and a groups. But it seems that the gap between “compromiser” the two parts of our movement is simply because I work widening. Among the grassroots movement, there seems to be a growing for an organization stigma against national groups. I have that is willing to pay been called a “sell-out” and a me to help animals “compromiser” simply because I work full-time....I can for an organization that is willing to pay certainly handle the me to help animals full-time (rather than name-calling--after having to deliver pizzas or tend bar to fund my activism).
    [Show full text]
  • The Probe, Issue 201 - June 1999
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The Probe: Newsletter of the National Animal Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Damage Control Association for June 1999 The Probe, Issue 201 - June 1999 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmprobe Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons "The Probe, Issue 201 - June 1999" (1999). The Probe: Newsletter of the National Animal Damage Control Association. 241. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmprobe/241 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Probe: Newsletter of the National Animal Damage Control Association by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE PROBE National Animal Damage Control Association Supplement to No. 201 June 1999 GENESIS THE SECRETARY'S DECISION There has long been a need for a professional society in In a recent speech at a Predator Control Summit meeting the field of vertebrate pest management ("nuisance ani- in Texas, Secretary [of the Interior] Andrus referred to the mals", "animal damage control", whatever). Wildlife man- present ADC program as a "war on wildlife." This in itself agers and educators tend to belittle this aspect of wildlife exposes the fact that Andrus has no knowledge of the management. It has become a "black hat" agency... animal damage control program, wildlife management, livestock management, range management, or wildlife The objectives of NADCA as stated in the attached population dynamics. Secretary Andrus also lacks concern prospectus are to work for the conservation of natural about the livestock losses to unmanaged predators and is resources and economic survival in the best interests of not aware of the real world problem..
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Ember Within
    The Wild Ember Within A Study of the Hunting Ethos in Norway and the U.S.A. Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Culture, Environment and Sustainability Submitted by Kristian Svendsen Bjørkdahl October, 2005 Centre for Development and the Environment University of Oslo Blindern, Norway Contents 1 Introducing Hunting………………………………………… 1 The Charge against Hunting……………………………………………………… 3 The Hunter’s Response…………………………………………………………… 10 2 Creatures…………………………………………………….. 13 The Problem of Pluralism………………………………………………………… 14 The Importance of Being Practical……………………………………………….. 19 Ceci n’est pas un animal vs. The Moral Status of Animals………………………. 24 The Hunter’s Animal……………………………………………………………... 36 The Hunting Game……………………………………………………………….. 41 Is There a Case for the Fair Chase?..……………………………………………... 48 3 Origins………………………………………………………. 51 The Hunting Hypothesis and the Killer Ape……………………………………... 51 A Fresh Look at Our Predatory Past……………………………………………… 54 10,000 Year Long Fall……………………………………………………………. 55 The Fall as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Human Ecologists… 62 The Wild Ember Within………………………………………………………….. 63 The Predatory Instinct……………………………………………………………. 67 The Return of the Killer Ape……………………………………………………... 71 To Argue with Instinct……………………………………………………………. 74 4 Webs…………………………………………………………87 Preserving Nature, or, Making Sure There Are Enough Animals to Hunt………. 89 The Hunter’s Enemy……………………………………………………………… 92 iii The Merciful Predator and the Art of Growing Animals…………………. 96 The Holist Sportsman …………………………………………………….. 99 Man and Nature……………………………………………………………108 5 Conclusion……………………………………………..119 References……………………………………………..122 iv Acknowledgements (and Apologies) I dedicate this thesis, and all the hours spent writing it, to Kine and Filip. At the same time, I would like to acknowledge the following individuals and institutions for their invaluable help and support: Andrew Brennan, Karen V.
    [Show full text]
  • Activists' Protests Against Hunting
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 45 Number 5 Article 7 5-1-1991 The Right to Arm Bears: Activists' Protests Against Hunting Aileen M. Ugalde Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Second Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Aileen M. Ugalde, The Right to Arm Bears: Activists' Protests Against Hunting, 45 U. Miami L. Rev. 1109 (1991) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol45/iss5/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Right to Arm Bears: Activists' Protests Against Hunting 1. INTRODUCTION: HAUNTING THE HUNTERS .............................. 1109 II. THE HUNTING DEBATE ................................................ 1113 A. The Strategies and Impact of Anti-Hunting Protesters ................... 1113 B. The Hunters' Response to Anti-Hunting Protesters ...................... 1116 III. THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF ANTI-HUNTING PROTESTERS .......... 1117 A. A History of Protest in First Amendment Doctrine ...................... 1118 B. The Connecticut Hunter Harassment Act: A Model ..................... 1122 C. Dorman v. Satti: When Activists Take Their Case into the Field ......... 1124 1. CONTENT-NEUTRAL AND CONTENT-BASED RESTRICTIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Wrenn Colostate 0053A 13455.Pdf
    DISSERTATION PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION Submitted by Corey Lee Wrenn Department of Sociology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Michael Carolan Lynn Hempel Michael Lacy Marcela Velasco Copyright by Corey Lee Wrenn 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT PROFESSIONALIZATION, FACTIONALISM, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT SUCCESS: A CASE STUDY ON NONHUMAN ANIMAL RIGHTS MOBILIZATION This project explores the intra-movement interactions between professionalized and radical factions in the social movement arena using a content analysis of movement literature produced by the Nonhuman Animal rights movement between 1980 and 2013. Professionalized factions with greater symbolic capital are positioned to monopolize claimsmaking, disempower competing factions, and replicate their privilege and legitimacy. Radical factions, argued to be important variables in a movement’s health, are thus marginalized, potentially to the detriment of movement success and the constituency for whom they advocate. Specifically, this study explores the role of professionalization in manipulating the tactics and goals of social movement organizations and how the impacts of professionalization may be aggravating factional boundaries. Boundary maintenance may prevent critical discourse within the movement, and it may also provoke the “mining” of radical claimsmaking for symbols that have begun to resonate within the movement and the public. Analysis demonstrates a number of important consequences to professionalization that appear to influence the direction of factional disputes, and ultimately, the shape of the movement. Results indicate some degree of factional fluidity, but professionalization does appear to be a dominant force on movement trajectories by concentrating power in the social change space.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Animals: 2001 More Than a Slap on the Wrist
    Overview: The State of Animals in 2001 Paul G. Irwin he blizzard of commentary tors have taken part in a fascinating, environments; and change their inter- marking the turn of the millen- sometimes frustrating, dialogue that actions with other animals, evolving Tnium is slowly coming to an end. seeks to balance the needs of the nat- from exploitation and harm to Assessments of the past century (and, ural world with those of the world’s respect and compassion. more ambitiously, the past millenni- most dominant species—and in the Based upon that mission, The HSUS um) have ranged from the self-con- process create a truly humane society. almost fifty years after its founding gratulatory to the condemnatory. The strains created by unrestrained in 1954, “has sought to respond cre- Written from political, technological, development and accelerating harm atively and realistically to new chal- cultural, environmental, and other to the natural world make it impera- lenges and opportunities to protect perspectives, some of these commen- tive that the new century’s under- animals” (HSUS 1991), primarily taries have provided the public with standing of the word “humane” incor- through legislative, investigative, and thoughtful, uplifting analyses. At porate the insight that our human educational means. least one commentary has concluded fate is linked inextricably to that of It is only coincidentally that the that a major issue facing the United all nonhuman animals and that we choice has been made to view the States and the world is the place and all have a duty to promote active, animal condition through thoughtful plight of animals in the twenty-first steady, thorough notions of justice analysis of the past half century—the century, positing that the last few and fair treatment to animals and life span of The HSUS—rather than of decades of the twentieth century saw nonhuman nature.
    [Show full text]
  • V O Ice S from Th E E Co Logica L R E Sista N Ce No . 10
    Do or Die is a journal crammed with reports and analysis from the worldwide ecological frontlines. In these times of concrete alienation here are voices that shine hope from people and movements taking action to defend nature, create revolution and re-wild humanity... Voices from the Ecological Resistance Voices from the Ecological Resistance Issue Ten No. 10 Thoughts ran in me that words and writing were nothing and must die, for action is the essence of all and if thou dost not act, thou dost nothing. ISSN 1462-5989 / ISBN 0-9545662-0-3 — Gerrard Winstanley A Collective Suicide Note... For various very compelling reasons we have decided that this is the last ever issue of Do or Die that will be produced. We’ll continue to work on the distribution of this issue, and are engaged in maintaining the web site and dealing with general requests—as well as various other radical projects. As this is the last ever issue we are not taking any subscribers, submissions or pre-orders, but donations to help us clear our huge printing debts of about £6,000 would be very gratefully received. Any extra (HA!) will be put towards radical ecological direct action. Ten years, gone in a flash… The black helicopters are circling our compound. With our glasses of poison, we salute you, comrades! “Do or Die—Digging out the avalanche of capitalism with the spatula of activism since 1992.” Published by Do or Die c/o Prior House 6 Tilbury Place Brighton BN2 2GY UK Email: [email protected] Web: www.eco-action.org/dod Our email is for orders and specific requests only—no news, discussion lists or mass mailings please.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchism and Animal Liberation
    Anarchism and Animal Liberation Anarchism and Animal Liberation Essays on Complementary Elements of Total Liberation Edited by Anthony J. Nocella II, Richard J. White and Erika Cudworth Forewords by David N. Pellow and John C. Alessio McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, 19xx– Xxxxxxxx : xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx / Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7864-9457-6 (softcover : acid free paper) ♾ ISBN 978-1-4766-2132-6 (ebook) 1. xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx—xxxx xxxxxxx BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING DATA ARE AVAILABLE © 2015 Anthony J. Nocella II, Richard J. White and Erika Cudworth. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cover image: George Tsartsianidis/Thinkstock Printed in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Jefferson, North Carolina 28640 www.mcfarlandpub.com To all those who continue to struggle toward an anarchist society: a society of non- violence, compassion, respect and liberty for all animals, both human and nonhuman. We will always be indebted to those who have sacrificed their own freedom and futures by confronting those forms of oppression, domination and rule that bring immeasurable pain, misery and suffering into the world. Acknowledgments Anthony, Richard and Erika would like to thank everyone who assisted in the production and publish- ing of this book. Special mention must go to David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Liberation: Devastate to Liberate, Or Devastatingly Liberal? Contents
    Animal Liberation: Devastate to Liberate, or Devastatingly Liberal? Contents Becoming Part of the Problem ....................... 5 On being the Greatest allies of our own gravediggers .......... 9 Guilt-Soaked Consumption ......................... 11 Fashion Victims ............................... 13 ‘All humans are bastards,’ right Ronnie? . 14 Desperately seeking sympathy ....................... 16 Up shit’s clique without a paddle ...................... 20 What’s class got to do with it? ....................... 22 Animated liberals .............................. 25 Thinking for ourselves ............................ 29 Afterword ................................... 32 2 “One can only empathise with individuals, motivated by a sincere de- sire for reform, who join ecology groups, consumer organisations and alternative political parties. In any of these groups these individuals are directed by a firmly entrenched leadership through a maze of po- litically motivated compromises to an end that is sadly predictable: the indefinite postponement of profound social transformation, the enrichment of the careers of a few bureaucrats and the permanent disillusion of a number of intelligent individuals. from ‘Call it Sleep’ — Cronin/Seltzer The movement which has sprung up around animal rights has gained widespread notoriety and a fair amount of support. It appeals to all sorts of people, generally the compassionate souls and especially the young. Kids, grown up in a world where the cruelty and horror has never been more openly and apparently fraternised by the media, and educational system look for something to do about it all. The lure of the animal rights movement lies exactly in that it appears that you can do something about it. With its sit-ins, hunt sabotage, commando-style Animal Liberation Front (ALF) raids etc. the movement certainly has the airs of militancy surrounding it and even if someone doesn’t get directly involved in stuff then they can still feel part of it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Animals Farmed Series in the Guardian
    “It Would Be Kinder to Shoot Them” A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Animals Farmed Series in The Guardian Lukas Leitinger Supervisor: Núria Almiron Academic Year: 2019/20 Research project of the MA in International Studies in Media, Power, and Difference Department of Communication Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Abstract This study conducted a critical discourse analysis on the Animals farmed series in The Guardian. To this end, the messages of the 196 articles from the launch of the series until April 20, 2020 and 8 articles from outside the series were analysed. Predominantly, the language of the series reinforces animal oppression by only asking how, not if, we should farm nonhuman animals. Some articles in the series show farmed animals’ suffering and workers’ ethical dilemmas, yet thorough challenges to animal oppression were only found outside the series. Thus, the study identified an underlying welfarist ideology throughout Animals farmed. Additionally, this study conducted a political economy analysis to explore the economic pressures behind the series. This analysis revealed links to the animal industry and philanthropy, which helps explain the findings. With these findings, the study contributes to critical animal and media studies and to journalism fighting animal oppression. Keywords: farmed animals, animal oppression, newspapers, critical animal and media studies, critical discourse analysis, political economy, philanthropy Type of Project: Research Report 2 Table of contents 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 2004 Volume XIII, #2
    FINDING HOPE & MEANING IN Cockfighters AVIAN FLU CATASTROPE (page 3) spread Asian Asian H5N1 pandemic rages on–– worst ever factory farm disaster killer bird flu BANGKOK, BEIJING, it apparently does not cross easily into BANGKOK, BEIJING– – C o c k f i g h t e r s , J A K A R T A ––United Nations Food & humans, and attacks mainly children, cock breeders, and public officials kow-towing to Agricultural Organization chief Jacques who have had less time to develop a them tried to pass the blame for spreading the dead- Diouf on February 25 opened an emer- spectrum of immunities to flu viruses. ly H5N1 avian flu virus throughout Southeast Asia gency meeting in Bangkok of experts Trying to eradicate the H5N1 to pigeons, sparrows, and even open-billed storks. from 23 nations with a warning that the outbreak before it mutates has involved Bad vaccines took some of the rap, too. H5N1 avian flu pandemic sweeping killing virtually all the poultry of entire An attempt was even made, as the death Southeast Asia in recent months is not regions. The economic fallout may toll increased on factory farms, to attribute the epi- yet under control. Diouf urgently have influenced both Japan and Indo- demic to free range poultry producers. appealed for economic help from other nesia to claim prematurely that their But as the H5N1 “red zones” expanded in parts of the world. H5N1 outbreaks were over, and at least eight nations, the evidence pointed ever Fear that H5N1 could quickly appears to have caused China to hope more directly at commerce in gamecocks––and at mutate into a virulent human form was repeatedly that the disease was geo- the efforts of cockfighters and cock breeders to pro- heightened on February 19 when Thai graphically contained, only to see it tect their birds from the culls and disease outbreaks scientists confirmed that the disease had leap hundreds of miles and re-emerge.
    [Show full text]