DOCSLIB.ORG

Diversity Agenda Vs. Learning Class Warfare Taxes Threats to Free Speech Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diversity Agenda Vs. Learning Class Warfare Taxes Threats to Free Speech Online Diversity Agenda Vs. Learning Class Warfare Taxes Threats to Free Speech Online What Will It Take to Control Spending? SPRING 2019 CONSERVATIVE IDEAS FOR ADVANCING LIBERTY Freedom Is for Everyone CONTENTS | SPRING 2019 EDITOR’S NOTE N THIS ISSUE, YOU WILL FIND oppressors to the oppressed (primarily racial 2 Heather Mac Donald (p. 16) discussing “the and sexual minorities) is the only just purpose What Will trashing of Western civilization” on college of politics, and if individual rights get in the I ONE QUESTION 21 campuses. Picking up that theme, Mike Gon- way of that project, then they must be shoved What One Change It Take to zalez (p. 32) identifies the entitlement state aside. Likewise, GDP growth, debt, deficits, and Would Improve the as a major motivator of those same corrupt- other traditional metrics of good policy matter U.S. Immigration Control ing agendas. not when weighed against the imperatives of System? A few pages away you can find Dan Mitchell equality of condition. (p. 26) employing the concept of deadweight loss In the conservative understanding, the 4 Spending? to explain why everybody loses when tax rates preservation of individual liberty is the only are high, and Jonathan Bydlak (p. 21) making the legitimate purpose of government, and limiting case that controlling federal spending requires political power via a constitution of checks and ROUND UP budget process reforms. balances and rights is the means by which liberty Tax Rates in the ’50s, Something for everybody—or at least is preserved. Homeschoolers everybody who likes bad news. Read in While the conservative concern for Shine, Late-Term conjunction, these articles lead to a dire constitutional rigor may seem distant from Abortions, CBO summation of our current situation: the everyday struggles of people, it at least has Mis-Estimates, Raising taxes will harm the economy and lead this advantage over the progressive mania for Admissions Scandal How the to even more government spending (and deficits equality: It does not create insoluble conflicts Diversity and debt); but government spending is already over who is more oppressed than whom. 9 rising because organized interest groups value Progressives want more minorities admitted Agenda such spending and the political process rewards to universities—as long as those minorities politicians for delivering it; meanwhile, the are not highly qualified Asian-Americans. TOOLKIT Corrupts Higher very existence of the entitlement state induces Progressives want economic justice—but Effective Facebook Education 26 citizens to see their interests in terms of what primarily justice for the inner cities, not Marketing government gives them; that, in turn, encourages so much for the hayseeds up in the holler. in the Age of AN INTERVIEW WITH Class Warfare HEATHER MAC DONALD citizens to identify as members of interest Progressives oppose bigotry—unless it’s bigotry Algorithm Anxiety 16 Taxes groups, often organized around some concept (and worse) perpetrated against homosexuals of victimhood, ensuring that constituencies for in the name of Islam. Progressives want to 14 spending remain powerful; and all along, rising stand with the historically oppressed—as long generations are being taught that freedom is as the historically oppressed are not Jews CALENDAR a con designed to keep straight, white men supporting the state of Israel. Progressives 40 35 32 in power. want to promote the voices of racial It’s a complicated knot. So how can it be minorities—as long as those voices aren’t untangled? You start by picking a string. Fiscal expressing conservative opinions. PICTURING POLICY The Enemies sanity can help fix the culture, and fixing the With progressives in power, you can never Economic Freedom of Free Speech culture can make it easier to find fiscal sanity. be sure that you won’t be the next egg broken Is Good for the Who Taught Citizens to Think The best case for cutting spending is grounded for an omelet. Conservatives don’t have need of Environment Are Targeting in an understanding of the legitimate purposes doctrines to resolve the tensions between theory of Themselves as Victims? of government. And convincing people that and practice—such as intersectionality—because 43 the Internet government has grown beyond those purposes freedom really is for everybody. Peter’s liberty is requires talking about things other than math not diminished when Paul’s is protected. In fact, © 2019 The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 544-4400 and economics. it’s enhanced. Alex Adrianson, Editor | Kay Coles James, President | Robert Bluey, Vice President of Communications | Jim Weidman, Editorial Director | It also helps to know the contrary position. And when government protects your liberty, Melissa Bluey, Designer As the Left sees things, individual rights are it puts your fortunes and your future in your Founded in 1978 by The Heritage Foundation, The Insider is a quarterly journal of conservative ideas for promoting liberty in public policy. less important than power, disparities in which own hands, not that of a group claiming you as a Contact the editor: [email protected] ALEX ADRIANSON edits The Insider. Have a story idea? are the real cause of suffering in the world. In member. If we can’t win with that message, then Nothing in these pages is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder Want to connect with him? KEITHBISHOP/GETTY IMAGES; ARTISTEER/GETTY IMAGES; JUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES SULLIVAN/GETTY JUSTIN IMAGES; ARTISTEER/GETTY IMAGES; KEITHBISHOP/GETTY CLOCKWISE: DAVID MUIR/GETTY IMAGES; ETHAN MILLER/GETTY IMAGES; IMAGES; MILLER/GETTY ETHAN IMAGES; MUIR/GETTY DAVID CLOCKWISE: the passage of any bill before Congress. Email [email protected] this view, the redistribution of power from the we are doing something wrong. IMAGES WEBKING/GETTY COVER: 2 SPRING 2019 THE INSIDER THE INSIDER SPRING 2019 3 which resulted in detaining parents JESSICA VAUGHAN Tweaks using so their cases could be adjudicated, executive authority leading to, in most cases, deportation In fiscal year will help, but the most of the families. This policy became 2017, foreign visitors The effective way to deter known as family separation. In overstayed their legal proceedings overstays is to reduce the response to intense political entries about 700,000 incentives and increase furor over family separation, the times, with more than for the average the risk of consequences. administration reversed the policy 400,000 of them failing overstayer likely If overstayers cannot after only a couple months. So right to depart or acquire will take over easily get a job, a driver’s now, family units showing up at our a legal status within eight years. license, and other southern border are caught and then eight months after the benefits, there is little released. Many will fail to show up for end of the fiscal year. One option point to remaining their immigration court hearing, yet Not only does this is to require illegally. Implementing keeping the family together in custody rampant disregard for certain mandatory use is simply not allowed by law. our laws undermine of E-Verify and Our asylum system contributes to the integrity of our categories discouraging sanctuary this mess by ensuring that very weak immigration system, it is of visa policies will help. claims of “credible fear” are used to also a national security holders to For those who will delay the adjudication of these cases, and public safety not be deterred, we guaranteeing that the claimants will vulnerability, since we waive their need more effective be released into the United States. can’t know the motives of rights to enforcement. Unlike The result is the surge we are those who overstay. a court illegal border now seeing at our borders with Congress has been hearing as crossers, who often children used as pawns to game the pressing for action for can be processed A WALL MARKS THE U.S.-MEXICAN BORDER at Tijuana and Baja, March 13. system. And because of the special 25 years, but successive a condition administratively by attention and legal processes we administrations have of admission. immigration officers give to children and asylum seekers, failed to address the upon arrest, visa our immigration officials and court problem. The first step overstayers are system are underwater, with no hope was to implement an entry-exit entitled to more generous forms What One Change Would Improve of ever digging out. Without changes, system, and one important benefit is of due process, including a hearing most of these illegal immigrants will that we now have a better idea of who in immigration court and the the U.S. Immigration System? remain in the United States even is overstaying and in what categories opportunity for protracted appeals. though only about 10 percent of of entry. Our immigration courts are now so Central Americans will actual end up Now the State Department must dysfunctional that the proceedings DAVID INSERRA enough time talking about the fact that once being given asylum. adjust and issue fewer visas to for the average overstayer arrested an illegal immigrant enters the country and is These loopholes should be changed applicants in categories with poor today likely will take over eight Right now we are seeing a spike in illegal apprehended, the immigration system generally to allow us to keep families together, compliance. Dozens of countries have years. Congress should address the immigration at our southern border. Three just releases them into the United States. but quickly return them to their overstay rates of more than 30 percent backlog; one option is to require things distinguish these immigrants from Two loopholes plus our weak asylum system home countries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Testimony
    CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY H.R. 51, "Washington, D.C. Admission Act" Testimony before the Committee on Oversight and Reform United States House of Representatives March 22, 2021 Zack Smith Legal Fellow Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies The Heritage Foundation Table of Contents I. The District of Columbia cannot be converted into our nation's 51st state without a constitutional amendment 3 II. Former Washington, DC Mayor Walter E. Washington raised practical concerns about making the District a state, and former Delegate Walter Fauntroy raised constitutional concerns 4 III. The historical reasons for securing full federal control over the seat of government, for preventing one state from having outsized influence on the federal government, and for the important symbolic value of having a national capital free from a single state's influence remain true today 6 IV. Both Democratic and Republican Justice Departments have reached the same conclusion that DC statehood requires a constitutional amendment 8 A. The fact that Congress has used its authority under Article IV, section 3 of the Constitution to admit 37 other states is constitutionally irrelevant. The District owes its existence to the fact that Congress exercised its CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY authority under Article I, section 8, clause 17 of the Constitution to create it. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 l. The prior retrocession of part of the District to Virginia should not be used as precedent 1O 2. Maryland's consent is needed before a new state can be created from the land it donated to create the federal seat of government 10 B. The Twenty-Third Amendment provides the most serious constitutional obstacle to the District's becoming a state via simple legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S6886
    S6886 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE October 31, 2017 that—exactly the opposite. She wrote EXECUTIVE SESSION preme court justices who were not ap- that if a judge’s personal views were to proved by Republican Senators to move impede that judge’s ability to impar- to the Federal bench: Lisabeth Tabor tially apply the law, then the judge EXECUTIVE CALENDAR Hughes from Kentucky, Myra Selby should recuse herself from the case. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under from Indiana, Don Beatty from South As the coauthor of that article and the previous order, the Senate will pro- Carolina, Louis Butler from Wisconsin, current president of Catholic Univer- ceed to executive session and resume Patricia Timmons-Goodson from North sity recently put it, ‘‘The case against consideration of the Barrett nomina- Carolina. Prof. Barrett is so flimsy, that you tion, which the clerk will report. Senate Republicans turned obstruc- have to wonder whether there isn’t The senior assistant legislative clerk tion of judicial nominees into an art some other, unspoken, cause for their read the nomination of Amy Coney form under President Obama. Yet Sen- objection.’’ Barrett, of Indiana, to be United States ator MCCONNELL, day after day, has It does make you wonder. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit. said: ‘‘I think President Obama has To those using this matter as cover The PRESIDING OFFICER. The as- been treated very fairly by any objec- to oppose Professor Barrett because of sistant Democratic leader. tive standard.’’ her personally held religious beliefs, Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, Senator He comes to the floor now regularly let me remind you, there are no reli- MCCONNELL has come to the floor to to complain about ‘‘obstruction’’ of gious tests—none—for public office in complain about what he calls obstruc- Trump nominees.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Think About the Foundations of American Conservatism James W
    No. 22 How to Think About the Foundations of American Conservatism James W. Ceaser, Ph.D. ontemporary American conservatism, which is Reagan. The remarkable diversity of this coalition has Cnotorious for its internal factionalism, is held been both a source of strength and a source of weak- together by a self-evident truth: conservatives’ shared ness for the conservative movement. Each part came antipathy to modern liberalism. Their main objections into existence at a different time and under differ ent are well-known. circumstances, and each has been guided by a different Almost to a man or woman, conservatives oppose principle by which it measures what is good or right. using government authority to enforce a vision of greater equality labeled by its supporters, with great • For religious conservatives, that principle is seduction, as “social justice.” Nearly as many conser- biblical faith. vatives object to the use of government authority—or, • For libertarians, it is the idea of “spontaneous alternatively, to the denial of government authority order,” the postulate that a tendency is opera- where it is natural, legal, and appropriate—to pro- tive in human affairs for things to work out for mote a worldview of individualism, expressivism, and themselves, provided no artificial effort is made secularism. Finally, most conservatives want nothing to impose an overall order. to do with an airy internationalism, frequently suspi- • For neoconservatives, it is a version of “natural cious of the American nation, that has shown itself so right,” meaning a standard of good in political inconstant in its support for the instruments of secu- affairs that is discoverable by human reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Edwards Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt5q2nf31k No online items Preliminary Inventory of the Lee Edwards papers Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Staff Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2009, 2013 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Preliminary Inventory of the Lee 2010C14 1 Edwards papers Title: Lee Edwards papers Date (inclusive): 1878-2004 Collection Number: 2010C14 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 389 manuscript boxes, 12 card file boxes, 2 oversize boxes, 5 film reels, 1 oversize folder(146.4 Linear Feet) Abstract: Correspondence, speeches and writings, memoranda, reports, studies, financial records, printed matter, and sound recordings of interviews and other audiovisual material, relating to conservatism in the United States, the mass media, Grove City College, the Heritage Foundation, the Republican Party, Walter Judd, Barry Goldwater, and Ronald Reagan. Includes extensive research material used in books and other writing projects by Lee Edwards. Also includes papers of Willard Edwards, journalist and father of Lee Edwards. Creator: Edwards, Lee, 1932- Creator: Edwards, Willard, 1902-1990 Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Tow Center for Digital Journalism CONSERVATIVE A Tow/Knight Report NEWSWORK A Report on the Values and Practices of Online Journalists on the Right Anthony Nadler, A.J. Bauer, and Magda Konieczna Funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Boundaries and Tensions Within the Online Conservative News Field 15 Training, Standards, and Practices 41 Columbia Journalism School Conservative Newswork 3 Executive Summary Through much of the 20th century, the U.S. news diet was dominated by journalism outlets that professed to operate according to principles of objectivity and nonpartisan balance. Today, news outlets that openly proclaim a political perspective — conservative, progressive, centrist, or otherwise — are more central to American life than at any time since the first journalism schools opened their doors. Conservative audiences, in particular, express far less trust in mainstream news media than do their liberal counterparts. These divides have contributed to concerns of a “post-truth” age and fanned fears that members of opposing parties no longer agree on basic facts, let alone how to report and interpret the news of the day in a credible fashion. Renewed popularity and commercial viability of openly partisan media in the United States can be traced back to the rise of conservative talk radio in the late 1980s, but the expansion of partisan news outlets has accelerated most rapidly online. This expansion has coincided with debates within many digital newsrooms. Should the ideals journalists adopted in the 20th century be preserved in a digital news landscape? Or must today’s news workers forge new relationships with their publics and find alternatives to traditional notions of journalistic objectivity, fairness, and balance? Despite the centrality of these questions to digital newsrooms, little research on “innovation in journalism” or the “future of news” has explicitly addressed how digital journalists and editors in partisan news organizations are rethinking norms.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Movement
    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint for Balance: a FEDERAL BUDGE T F OR FY 20 18
    Blueprint for Balance: A FEDERAL BUDGET FOR FY 2018 The Heritage Foundation © 2017 by The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-0-89195-163-6 Contents Contributors .................................................................................................................................................... ix Introduction: Blueprint for Balance ........................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: Policies for a Congressional Budget ........................................................... 5 Chapter 2: Budget Proposals ..........................................................................................................13 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Repeal the USDA Catfish Inspection Program ........................................................................................16 Eliminate the Conservation Technical Assistance Program..................................................................17 Eliminate the Rural Business Cooperative Service.................................................................................18 Prohibit Funding for National School Meal Standards ............................................................................................ and the Community Eligibility Provision 19 Withhold Funding for Federal Fruit and Vegetable Supply Restrictions ............................................20 Repeal
    [Show full text]
  • September 2, 2021
    September 2, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Senate Majority Leader Senate Minority Leader 322 Hart Senate Office Building 317 Russell Senate Office Building United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy 1236 Longworth House Office Building 2468 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Leader Schumer, Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy, As our jurisdictions’ Attorneys General, we are responsible for protecting the health, safety, and well-being of our residents. Although our jurisdictions vary in size, geography, and political composition, we are united in our commitment to an effective criminal justice system that safeguards the communities of our states. To that end, a bipartisan coalition of Attorneys General supported the passage of the First Step Act of 2018—landmark legislation that brought common sense improvements to myriad aspects of the criminal justice system. Central to these reforms was retroactive relief for individuals sentenced under the discredited 100-to-1 crack-to-powder cocaine ratio that Congress abolished in 2010. Following the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Terry v. United States, however, the lowest level crack cocaine offenders remain categorically ineligible for resentencing. We write today to urge Congress to amend the First Step Act, and to clarify that its retroactive relief applies to all individuals sentenced under the prior regime. Congress enacted the historic First Step Act of 2018 to modernize the criminal justice system, implementing comprehensive reform in areas such as corrections, criminal charging, community re-entry, and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Olin Foundation in 1953, Olin Embarked on a Radical New Course
    THE CHRONICLE REVIEW How Right­Wing Billionaires Infiltrated Higher Education By Jane Mayer FEBRUARY 12, 2016 ​ If there was a single event that galvanized conservative donors to try to wrest control of higher ​ education in America, it might have been the uprising at Cornell University on April 20, 1969. That afternoon, during parents’ weekend at the Ithaca, N.Y., campus, some 80 black students marched in formation out of the student union, which they had seized, with their clenched fists held high in black­power salutes. To the shock of the genteel Ivy League community, several were brandishing guns. At the head of the formation was a student who called himself the "Minister of Defense" for Cornell’s Afro­American Society. Strapped across his chest, Pancho Villa­style, was a sash­like bandolier studded with bullet cartridges. Gripped nonchalantly in his right hand, with its butt resting on his hip, was a glistening rifle. Chin held high and sporting an Afro, goatee, and eyeglasses reminiscent of Malcolm X, he was the face of a drama so infamous it was regarded for years by conservatives such as David Horowitz as "the most disgraceful occurrence in the history of American higher education." John M. Olin, a multimillionaire industrialist, wasn’t there at Cornell, which was his alma mater, that weekend. He was traveling abroad. But as a former Cornell trustee, he could not have gone long without seeing the iconic photograph of the armed protesters. What came to be ​ ​ known as "the Picture" quickly ricocheted around the world, eventually going on to win that year’s Pulitzer Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Platforms: Responses to Perceived Liberal Bias in Social Media
    Partisan Platforms: Responses to Perceived Liberal Bias in Social Media A Research Paper submitted to the Department of Engineering and Society Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia • Charlottesville, Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science, School of Engineering Luke Giraudeau Spring, 2021 On my honor as a University Student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments Signature __________________________________________ Date __________ Luke Giraudeau Approved __________________________________________ Date __________ Richard Jacques, Department of Engineering and Society Introduction In the United States, public opinion about tech companies’ political biases is divided along partisan lines (Vogels, Perrin, & Anderson, 2020). In the U.S. since 2018, 69 percent of Republicans claim that technology companies favor liberal views, whereas only 19 percent of Democrats say that technology companies favor the alternative view. Over 50 percent of liberals believe that perspectives are treated equally, whereas only 22 percent of conservatives feel this way. Critics who allege bias have organized to promote legislation such as the Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act (2020) as well as an executive order (Executive Order 13,925, 2020). Furthermore, conservative entrepreneurs have produced new social media platforms such as Gab and Parler that claim
    [Show full text]
  • W&M in Washington Spring 2011 Media As the Fourth Branch Of
    W&M in Washington Spring 2011 Media as the Fourth Branch of Government Taught by Professor Dan Doherty Often referred to as the “fourth branch” of government, the media serve an essential role in the functioning of a representative democracy. If a government is to be responsive to its citizens, those citizens must first gather the information necessary to develop informed preferences: information about the world around them – the economy, the environment, national security threats, etc. – and information about the beliefs, proposals, and actions of their elected leaders, and of those who seek such positions. Citizens must also engage in some form of individual and collective analysis and deliberation. The media, particularly in the Nation’s Capital, play a critical role in each of these steps. Our goal will be to understand and evaluate the media’s performance of these vital roles. Washington Program Internship . 6 credit hours: INTR 499 This course provides students the opportunity to observe the media from a number of angles. Some will intern with a media outlet that reports on the actions of politicians and the government, on the economy, the environment, national security threats, etc., such as the Washington Post organizations, Politico, the American Prospect, CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR, PBS NewsHour, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and others. Students may choose the other side of that equation and intern with, for example, the communications office of a Member of Congress, the Department of State or Homeland Security – i.e., an organization whose goal is to control and shape the information that the media report. Still others may intern with a think tank or an advocacy group, such as the American Enterprise Institute or the Heritage Foundation, or a public relations firm like Fleishman Hillard or APCO; these critical actors in our political system seek to shape how their issues of interest are portrayed and interpreted by the media, and thus ultimately shape public preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • How Trumpism Has Come to Define the Republican Party - the Washington Post Page 1 of 6
    How Trumpism has come to define the Republican Party - The Washington Post Page 1 of 6 The Washington Post Politics How Trumpism has come to define the Republican Party By Ashley Parker March 24 at 7:09 PM Over just a few days last week, the essence of Trumpism was on global display: The president ignored his advisers by congratulating Vladimir Putin, took the first steps toward imposing tariffs on billions of dollars in Chinese goods and signed a huge $1.3 trillion spending bill that will balloon the federal deficit. In each case, President Trump cast aside years of Republican orthodoxy — and most of the party followed right along. The raw, undefined brand of populism that Trump rode into office is now hardening into a clearer set of policies in his second year, remaking the Republican Party and the country on issues ranging from trade and immigration to spending and entitlement programs. Even amid persistent unpopularity and the chaotic din of his White House, Trump has used a mix of legislation and unilateral actions to successfully push ahead with key parts of his vision — tariffs that have rocked global markets; harsh crackdowns on illegal immigrants; a nationalistic foreign policy that spurns allies while embracing foes and costly policies with little concern for the growing national debt. CONTENT FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN "The Japanese government provides international cooperation in disaster risk reduction emphasizing mitigation and preparedness so that others can make use of this know-how and the https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-trumpism-has-come-to-define-the-republica..
    [Show full text]