DOCSLIB.ORG

The Social and Economic Impact of Hiv and Aids in Ukraine : a Re-Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Social and Economic Impact of Hiv and Aids in Ukraine : a Re-Study BRITISH COUNCIL UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH This Project was implemented with financial support from the Department of International Development of the United Kingdom (DFID) and the British Council for the Government of Ukraine THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF HIV AND AIDS IN UKRAINE : A RE-STUDY Olga Balakireva Alla Scherbyns’ka Yulia Galustian Yuriy Kruglov Olexander Yaremenko Ukrainian AIDS Centre at the Health Ukrainian Institute of Social Ministry of Ukraine Research Nataliya Levchuk Volodymyr Onikienko Institute of Economy, National Council for Studying Productive Academy of Science of Ukraine Forces, National Academy of Science of Ukraine Lidiya Andruschak UNAIDS In co-operation with international consultants Tony Barnett, University of East Anglia, UK and Alan Whiteside, University of Natal, South Africa Edited by Veena Lakhumalani, The British Council, Ukraine 14 Kyiv City - 2001 Contents INTRODUCTION Executive summary Section 1. THE NATURE OF HIV/AIDS AND THE GLOBAL EPIDEMIC Section 2. HIV AND AIDS DATA 2.1 HIV Data 2.2 AIDS Data 2.3 General conclusions Section 3. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES 3.1. Concepts of Susceptibility and Vulnerability 3.2. Description of Models for Projecting the Development of HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Ukraine and Incoming Data 3.3. Projecting the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Ukraine: main results Section 4. UKRAINE AS A RISK ENVIRONMENT 4.1 Demographic Situation in Ukraine 4.2 Social and Economic Characteristics of the Contemporary Ukrainian Society 4.3 Attitudes to People with HIV and AIDS in Ukraine 4.4 Behavioural Factors Contributing to HIV/AIDS Epidemic 4.5 Bio-Medical Factors and HIV Susceptibility 4.6 Regressive Analysis of Influence of Regional Development Factors on HIV-Infection Prevalence 4.7 Conclusions Section 5. DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF HIV EPIDEMIC IN UKRAINE 5.1 HIV/AIDS Impact upon Demographic Situation 5.2 Families’ Vulnerability 5.3 HIV/AIDS Impacts upon Economic Activity of Population 5.4 Susceptibility and Vulnerability of Some Economic Sectors 5.5 Social Support and Social Security to HIV-Positive People Section 6. PREPARADNESS OF THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM TO DEAL WITH HIV/AIDS Section 7. HOW TO ORGANISE AN AFFECTIVE RESPONSE TO THE EPIDEMIC? APPENDIXES 15 INTRODUCTION This work seeks to throw light on the scale of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Ukraine and attempts to identify some impacts the epidemic might have in the social and economic fields. Evidence throughout the world shows that HIV/AIDS decreases average life expectancy, increases the demand for medical services and highlights the problems of poverty and inequality. The inter-relation between HIV and economic development is complex. On the one hand, the epidemic affects economic development, and on the other, the epidemic development is dependent, to a large extent on the economic situation. This report focuses on the groups of population most vulnerable to HIV and attempts to identify the factors contributing to susceptibility to the virus. The epidemic is not limited to a certain community any more, it is spreading rapidly. Ukraine is becoming a society at a high risk of vast masses of the general population becoming infected. Today, it can be said that HIV threatens the future of the nation. This study has undertaken in order to analyse the social and economic context of the HIV/AIDS epidemic and to project possible demographic, social and economic impacts of the epidemic. As part of this research, projections were prepared to assess the scale of the epidemic years ahead in order to see its possible impacts. The projections presented are worth considering by health policy makers, especially in the field of HIV/AIDS prevention and dealing with demographic, social and economic effects of the epidemic. Ukraine became a sovereign country in 1991 with the population estimated at 49,036,500 on January 1, 2001.1 The first HIV case was registered in 1987, while 1994 is regarded as the first year of the epidemic. Between 1987 and 2001, 43,600 persons were infected.2 2,907 Ukrainians were diagnosed with AIDS, 1,473 died.3 Most of the infections are caused by intravenous drug use and unprotected sex. Unlike in comparable countries, the heterosexual epidemic overshadowed the homosexual epidemic - the registered of number homosexually transmitted infections are very few. The percentages of cases caused by unprotected sex and drug injection have changed recently. Throughout the last four years, the proportions of infections caused by intravenous drug use decreased from 83.6% (1997) to 56.6.% (2001) of the total, while the percentage of heterosexually transmitted infections grew from 11.3% (1997) to 26.9% (2001). The statistics on mother to child transmission are alarming: 196 cases were registered in 1997 (2.2% of the total) while 914 cases (13.1%) in 20014. Experts in the field believe the governmental statistics do not reflect the real situation. The estimated number of HIV infected in 1999 was 200000-240000 5. As in many other countries, the HIV epidemic in Ukraine is not a purely medical problem. The HIV/AIDS impacts might be classified as demographic (mortality and the number of orphans increase, while birth rate and population drop) and socio-economic at the levels of individuals, households, industry and the macro-economy. At the same time, it is important to remember that HIV is not a global catastrophe, it is rather an additional problem that unfolds like many others. A comprehensive multi-disciplinary approach is obviously needed to respond the HIV epidemic effectively. This message is addressed to everyone responsible for implementation of the Ukrainian National Programme on Combating AIDS, decision makers at the national and local levels responsible for HIV prevention, improving the surveillance system and providing HIV positive 1 Source: the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine (data available by January 1, 2001) 2 Source: Information Bulletin of the Ukrainian National AIDS Centre at the Health Ministry of Ukraine –No.21 – 2001. 3 Source: Information Bulletin of the Ukrainian National AIDS Centre at the Health Ministry of Ukraine –No.21 – 2001 4 Source: Information Bulletin of the Ukrainian National AIDS Centre at the Health Ministry of Ukraine –No.21 – 2001. 5 Source: HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Ukraine: assessment of the current situation/ The Project «Strategic of National Response to the epidemic of HIV/AIDS in 2001 – 2003» – Kyiv, 2000, p. 4. 16 people with medical aid and social support, as well as all governmental agencies and NGOs in the field of dealing with the epidemic. It is also addressed to the mass media and the society as a whole. The first attempt to postulate HIV/AIDS impacts upon the Ukrainian economy and society was a research study conducted in 1997 by Alan Whiteside (Health Economics and HIV/AIDS Research Division at the University of Natal, Durban) and Tony Barnett (School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich). The research did not cover issues of medicine or epidemiology. It has endeavoured to project long term social, economic and demographic effects of the epidemic. The findings appeared to be of great importance for senior officials in Ukraine’s health care. The research provided for two scenarios: according to one, the epidemic would develop slowly as in West Europe, while according to the other, Ukraine might suffer from an explosive spread of HIV, similar to South East Asia. Projecting the epidemic and its impacts is a vital component of strategic planning of an effective response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic . Four years have passed since then. These years have been marked with significant social and economic changes in Ukraine. The situation with HIV definitely worsened. A law was adopted On Introduction of Changes to the Law of Ukraine on AIDS Prevention and Social Protection of Population (March, 1998). This period was marked with further development of civil society, including the non-state sectors in the economy, political parties, various NGOs and volunteer organisations. A variety of social projects and programmes have been launched, especially at local level. The general public attitude to people with HIV and AIDS has become much more tolerant. Throughout 2000, an assessment of the HIV situation and resources available to deal with the epidemic was conducted within the framework of a national campaign for strategic planning of a national level response to the epidemic for 2001-2003. The assessment was initiated by UNAIDS and run by the Ministry of Health Care of Ukraine. This study involved experts from many ministries, state agencies and research institutions. On July 11, 2001, a national programme of dealing with HIV/AIDS was adopted and on June 22, 2001, President Kuchma signed a decree, proclaiming 2002 ‘the year of combating AIDS’. Taking into consideration the recent changes, a new projection of the epidemic and its possible social and economic impacts is required. We wish to express our gratitude to: Veena Lakhumalani, The British Council in Ukraine Chris Desmond, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa S. Philipovich, and L. Bochkova, Ministry of Health of Ukraine Many thanks go to the research advisers: Tony Barnett, University of East Anglia Norwich, UK Alan Whiteside, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa V. Steshenko, Economics Institute at the National Academy of Science of Ukraine for the help and support in preparing this report. We also would like to thank Sergei Naboka, the translator, and our colleagues from the Institute of Social Research: M. Varban, N. Dudar, I. Demchenko, D. Dmytruk, N. Karavaeva, and T. Bondar. 17 Executive Summary 20 years after the first case was registered, the HIV/AIDS epidemic has become one of the most serious problems affecting individuals and societies. The epidemic has touched all countries and its effects are more serious than it was predicted. Evidence throughout the world shows that HIV/AIDS decreases average life expectancy, increases the demand for medical services and highlights the problems of poverty and inequality.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Projects Support
    Сultural projects support Regarding participation in project contests: +38 (050) 629-18-08 Other issues: +38 (044) 504-22-66 For calls from abroad: +1 365 500-5000 For media representatives: [email protected] Other queries: [email protected] Lavrska St, 10-12, Kyiv, 01010, Ukraine FB.com/ucf.ua Directory CONTENT EU Grant Programmes Cross-border Cooperation Programme Ukraine Grant Programmes Poland-Belarus-Ukraine ENI CBC Hungary-Slovakia-Romania-Ukraine Ministry of Culture of Ukraine Horizon2020 Ministry of Information Policy Creative Europe Ministry of Youth and Sports Erasmus+UA Ukrainian Cultural Foundation Romania-Ukraine Programme Ukrainian Institute Export Promotion Office of Ukraine State Fund for Regional Development Grant Programmes International Renaissance Foundation of Euroregions Bohdan Hawrylyshyn Family Foundation Czech Centre Zagoriy Family Foundation Polish Institute in Ukraine Initiative for the Future British Council in Ukraine Harald Binder Cultural Enterprises Goethe-Institute in Ukraine French Institute Visegrad Fund International programmes Grant Programmes in North America UNESCO International Fund for Cultural Diversity (IFCD) United States Embassy in Ukraine 1 Ministry of Culture of Ministry of Information Policy Main body in the system of central executive bodies, which ensures the formation and implementation of state policy in the fields of culture and arts, Central executive body in the field protection of cultural heritage, export, import and return of cultural values, state of information sovereignty of Ukraine, in particular it deals with the issues language policy, as well as ensures the formation and implementation of state policy of dissemination of socially important information in Ukraine and abroad, in the field of cinematography.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Ukraine Resilient
    Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Russian from Society Ukraine: Safeguarding Resilient Research Paper Mathieu Boulègue and Orysia Lutsevych Ukraine Forum | June 2020 Resilient Ukraine Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Mathieu Boulègue and OrysiaLutsevych Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 The Impact of the Armed Conflict 13 3 Creating Resilience Dividends: Case Studies 27 4 Recommendations 33 5 Conclusion 37 About the Authors 38 Acknowledgments 39 1 | Chatham House Resilient Ukraine: Safeguarding Society from Russian Aggression Summary • Despite military conflict and an increasingly adversarial relationship with Russia, Ukraine has largely maintained its democratic reforms thanks to its resilience and determination to decide its own future. The country is gradually developing the capacity of its state institutions and civil society to address the political and social consequences of Russian aggression. • Russia’s three main levers of influence in Ukraine include the ongoing armed conflict, corruption, and the poor quality of the political sphere. The Kremlin seeks to exploit these vulnerabilities to promote polarization and encourage a clash between Ukraine’s citizens and its governing elite by taking military action, manipulating the corruption narrative, supporting pro-Russia parties, and fuelling religious tensions through the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). • The ramifications of the military operation in Donbas reverberate strongly across the country and domestic politics. The most prominent spillover effects include the circulation of firearms and the weakened capacity of authorities to reintegrate internally displaced people (IDPs) and war veterans. • With no clear way to end the armed conflict, there is a growing risk of societal polarization. This could have negative consequences for any prospective peace agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine
    Public Council of All-Ukrainian Environmental NGOs under the aegis of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs for preparation to Fifth Pan-European Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs Кyiv — 2003 Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine. Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs. — Kyiv, 2003. — 139 pages The document is prepared by the Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs in the framework of the «Program of Measures for Preparation and Conduction of 5th Pan-European Ministerial Conference» «Environment for Europe» for 2002–2003» approved by the National Organising Committee of Ukraine. Preparation and publication of the report was done wit the support of: Regional Ecological Center - REC-Kyiv; Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine; Milieukontakt Oost Europa in the framework of the project «Towards Kyiv-2003» with financial support of the Ministry of Territorial Planning, Construction and the Environment; UN office in Ukraine Contents Foreword . 1. Environmental Policy and Legislation . 1.1. Legislative Background of Environmental Policy . 1.2. Main State Documents Defining Environmental Policy . 1.3. Enforcement of Constitution of Ukraine . 1.4. Implementation of Environmental Legislation . 1.5. State of Ukrainian Legislation Reforming after Aarhus Convention Ratification . 1.6.Ukraine's Place in Transition towards Sustainable Development . 2. Environmental Management . 2.1. Activities of State Authorities . 2.2 Activities of State Control Authorities . 2.3. Environmental Monitoring System . 2.4. State Environmental Expertise . 2.5. Activities of Local Administrations in the Field of Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural-Relations-I
    Cultural Relations in the New Normal Handbook of Project Models1 ALTERATION—a programme that consisted of a series of online events for THE UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE professionals in the cultural field running from April to July 2021. It was aimed at The Ukrainian Institute is a public institution affiliated with the Ministry of Foreign defining new, efficient approaches to establishing, building, and developing inter- Affairs of Ukraine. The mission of the Ukrainian Institute is to strengthen Ukraine’s cultural relations and connections between EU and Ukrainian cultural and civil international standing through the means of cultural diplomacy. As such, this insti- society actors in conditions of pandemic-induced uncertainty, changes, and in- tute facilitates international connections between people and institutions, thereby stability. Alteration was the result of a mutual initiative of the EU Delegation to creating opportunities for Ukraine to interact and cooperate with the world. Ukraine and the Ukrainian Institute, supported via the EU-funded Cultural Rela- tions Platform. The strategic goals of the Ukrainian Institute are to: → Improve understanding and the visibility of Ukraine among foreign The programme covered such questions as: how should international cultural audiences; relations adapt to this “new reality?” How should digital tools be used for better Ensure a stable demand for professional interaction with Ukraine; efficiency? What best case practices exist in international cultural relations and → among cultural institutions in the EU and in Ukraine that can be of use to other in- → Build the capacity of Ukrainian actors in the cultural, educational, stitutions? And, lastly, how can cultural initiatives and products be promoted using and scientific spheres—as well as civil society—for international digital tools? cooperation; → Increase Ukraine’s involvement in current global cultural processes; This handbook is also part of the Alteration programme, drawing on key les- → Nurture and expand the usage of the Ukrainian language in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Value Project Cultural Relations in ‘Societies in Transition’
    The Cultural Value Project Cultural Relations in ‘Societies in Transition’ Joint Academic Report Helmut Anheier, Marie Gillespie, Malte Berneaud-Kötz, Olga Kononykhina, Regina A. List, Dounia Mahlouly, Eva Nieto McAvoy, Ben O’Loughlin, Olga Onuch, and Colin Wilding November 2018 Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures ...........................................................................................................4 Research Teams ..........................................................................................................................5 Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................8 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 10 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 15 2 Literature Review: Cultural Relations in ‘Societies in Transition’ ...................................... 18 2.1 Defining cultural relations? ......................................................................................... 19 2.2 Summary .................................................................................................................... 25 3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Researching international cultural relations: collaborative synergies
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Scenario 1) Background A. Donetsk and Luhansk Are Rebel
    Ukraine Scenario 1) Background a. Donetsk and Luhansk are rebel-held parts of Ukraine, and have been since 2014. The regions have ethnic Russian majorities and rebelled over attempts to ban Russian as an official language and curtail trade across the Russian border. Many of the rebels advocate secession. b. Ukraine’s state power company claimed the regions were some $431 million in debt over non- payment of bills. Russia says that they will be providing power through pre-existing lines effective immediately to avoid loss of electricity to some 3 million people in the effected areas. c. The decision by the Ukrainian government to cut power to the region appears to be an attempt to put pressure on the secessionist movement, though ironically by forcing them to turn to Russia for electricity, they may further enhance the region’s link to the Russian Federation. Source: “Russia to Supply Electricity to Eastern Ukraine After Kiev Cuts Power: Ukraine Says Regions Weren't Paying Their Bills,” Jason Ditz, Posted on April 25, Anti-War.com website: https://news.antiwar.com 2) Context a. Areas in Eastern Ukraine (Donbas Region) have had power cut by pro-Ukrainian (Kiev Government) groups that control the highest capacity power generation stations in the country. These are the 4 operational nuclear power stations in western Ukraine which includes the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Station, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe generating 6,000 MW. This leaves the Russian controlled areas with a small number of lower capacity coal generation facilities to power the Donbas region with additional power provided by Russian power plants to support the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Guidelines for Online Networking Study Tour to Czech
    Cultural Leadership Academy Application Guidelines Cultural Leadership Academy: online networking study tour to Czech Republic 1. House of Europe House of Europe is a new EU-funded programme fostering professional and creative exchange between Ukrainians and their colleagues in EU*1 countries. The programme focuses on different professional fields: culture and creative industries, education, health, social entrepreneurship, media, and youth. This encompasses 20+ separate programme lines enabling to go for professional events, internships, and networking in the EU*, or to enrol in study tours, residencies, trainings, and other forms of support. House of Europe funds cultural coproductions and cooperations between Ukrainian and EU* organisations, along with the development of cultural infrastructure and artistic concepts for youth in Ukraine. Finally, the programme offers various youth camps and an intra-Ukrainian university exchange. Implementation of House of Europe is led by Goethe-Institut Ukraine, with the British Council, Institut français, and Czech Centres as consortium partners. 2. Cultural Leadership Academy: online networking study tours 1 Here and further in the text whenever marked with *: plus the United Kingdom. The EU countries include Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden. Cultural Leadership Academy The Cultural Leadership Academy is an educational training programme aimed at turning officials from the governments of united territorial communities into cultural management leaders. Within the Academy, House of Europe will organise four online networking study tours — to the Czech Republic, Austria and two regions in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • IRF Annual Report for 2009
    International Renaissance Foundation Black 2009 Annual Report P349, ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL RENAISSANCE FOUNDATION he International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) is an integral part of the Open Society Institute network (established by American philanthropist George Soros) that incorporates national and regional foundations in more than thirty countries around the world, including Africa, Central and Eastern Europe and the former TSoviet Union. IRF was founded in 1990. The mission of the International Renaissance Foundation – is to promote open democratic society in Ukraine Black by providing financial and organizational support for important civil society initiatives. IRF remains one of the largest donor foundations in Ukraine, supporting civil society organizations working in areas that are part of the Foundation’s priorities. Every year, IRF provides up to $7 million in support to NGOs P349, in different regions of Ukraine. In addition to offering grants to other organizations, IRF also pursues its own (operational) activities, implementing projects in its target sectors that are also selected by public representatives. The Foundation is also well-known as an expert organization, initiator of effective projects, open discussions and catalyst of social change. Openness and transparency of donor activities, and conformity with the needs of society are the main principles that guide the work of the International Renaissance Foundation. The public is involved in the distribution of Foundation funds for the needs of building a democratic open society through participation in the Executive Board and IRF Program Boards. IRF distributes the majority of its grants to non-governmental organizations after open competitions are held for projects pursuing the program priorities set by leading representatives of local civil society The IRF Board is the main public body that forms the strategy for the entire organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity
    Sixth National Report of Ukraine on the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity English version December, 2018 Kyiv – 2018 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ 4 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 5 Section I. Information on the targets being pursued at the national level .................................. 7 National Target 1 (NT1). Increasing the level of public environmental consciousness ............................... 7 National Target 2 (NT 2). Improving the environmental situation and increasing the level of environmental security ......................................................................................................................... 8 National Target 3 (NT 3). Attaining the environmental conditions safe for human health ..........................10 National Target 4 (NT 4). Integrating the environmental policy and improving the integrated environmental management system ......................................................................................................... 11 National Target 5 (NT 5). Halting the loss of biological and landscape diversity and establishing the ecological network .........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Media Monitoring on EU Issues
    Ukrainian Media Monitoring on EU Issues The Project is funded by the EU Ukrainian regional media: overview by: International NGO Internews-Ukraine with support by: Delegation of the European Union to Ukraine Kyiv, 2012 1 2 Contents Ukrainian regional media: brief overview of the major regions ..................................... 10 Donetsk region........................................................................................................................... 11 Lviv region .................................................................................................................................. 16 Crimea......................................................................................................................................... 21 Kharkiv region ............................................................................................................................ 26 Lugansk region .......................................................................................................................... 37 Mykolaiv region .......................................................................................................................... 42 Odesa region.............................................................................................................................. 48 Zakarpattia region...................................................................................................................... 52 Detailed overview of Ukrainian regions by key media outlets.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Second Interim Report 10 September – 8 October 2012
    ENEMO’s 2012 parliamentary election observation mission in Ukraine is being conducted with the support of the United States Government, the German Foreign Office, the British Government, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and Black Sea Trust. European Network of Election Європейська мережа організацій, що Monitoring Organizations спостерігають за виборамиМіжнародна International Observation Mission місія спостереженняПарламентські вибори Ukraine Parliamentary Elections 2012 в Україні – 2012 Second Interim Report 10 September – 8 October 2012 The ENEMO mission for the 2012 parliamentary elections in Ukraine began its work on 23 July 2012 with the arrival of four Core Team members. ENEMO is the first international election observation mission registered for the Parliamentary Elections 2012 by the Central Election Commission (CEC). Thirty-five long-term observers arrived to Kyiv on 5 August 2012 and after training they were deployed throughout Ukraine. Long-term observer teams cover one or two oblasts of Ukraine. So far, ENEMO issued first interim report for the period August 5 – September 9. For this second interim report the focus of ENEMO long term observers was on the conduct of election campaign, formation and work of election commissions, media situation and official election complaints. Findings of this report are based on 272 reports received from long term observers. From the beginning of the mission, ENEMO observers have held 1728 meetings, out of which 823 were meetings with candidatesand representatives of political parties, 258 with election commissions and administrative officials, 238 with representatives of NGOs, 128 with media representatives and many other domestic and international interlocutors. They attended 81 rallies as well as132 DEC sessions, 47 CEC sessions and 19 PEC sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Draft River Basin Management Plan for Dnipro River Basin in Ukraine: Phase 1, Step 1 – Description of the Characteristics of the River Basin
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+): Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DNIPRO RIVER BASIN IN UKRAINE: PHASE 1, STEP 1 – DESCRIPTION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RIVER BASIN Report February 2019 Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Ms Josiane Mongellaz, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) EUWI+ country representative in Ukraine Ms Oksana Konovalenko Responsible international thematic lead expert Mr Philippe Seguin, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) Authors Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Mr Yurii Nabyvanets Ms Nataliia Osadcha Mr Vasyl Hrebin Ms Yevheniia Vasylenko Ms Olha Koshkina Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document “Assessment of the needs and identification of priorities in implementation of the River Basin Management Plans in Ukraine”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area.
    [Show full text]