Insert title of report here Moore River South

Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

Prepared for Moore River Company 24 July 2017

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 1 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

Contact Information Document Information

Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd Prepared for Moore River Company Trading as Cardno Project Name Moore River South ABN 77 009 119 000 File Reference P7026-RP-002-B-

Vegetation.docx 11 Harvest Terrace, West Perth WA 6005 Job Reference P7026 Telephone: 08 9273 3888 Date 24 July 2017 Facsimile: 08 9486 8664 International: +61 8 9273 3888

[email protected] Revision Number B www.cardno.com

Author(s): Denise Morgan

Approved By: Paul Wiseman Effective Date: 24/07/17

Date Approved: 24/07/17

Document History

Revision Date Description of Revision Prepared by: Reviewed by:

A 21/07/17 Draft for Review D. Morgan P. Wiseman B 24/07/17 Issue D. Morgan P. Wiseman

© Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document.

Prepared for Moore River Company Page ii

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Sources 1 1.3 Study Area 1 1.4 Proposed Irrigation Areas 1 2 Vegetation 3 2.1 Vegetation Condition 3 2.2 Plant Communities 4 2.3 Significant Flora 5 2.4 Threatened Ecological Communities 5 2.5 Environmentally Sensitive Areas 5 3 Irrigation Assessment and Control 7 4 Conclusions 8 5 References 9

Figures

Figure 1 –Approved POS and Outline Development Plan Figure 2 – Staging Plan Figure 3 – POS Conceptual Design Figure 4 – Conceptual Design Coastal Nodes Figure 5 – Vegetation Condition Figure 6 – Vegetation Communities

Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

1 Introduction

1.1 Purpose This report provides an overview of vegetation character and condition affecting Stage 1 of the proposed Moore River South development, in support of an application for Works Approval of a wastewater treatment plan to service the development. In particular, the report relates to areas that are proposed to be irrigated by treated wastewater.

1.2 Sources Information for this report is largely sourced from technical reports prepared to support the ODP (Structure Plan) for the development. These reports are listed in Section 5.

1.3 Study Area The area the subject of this report is Stage 1 shown in Figure 2. Stage 1 comprises the following: > 1 x Town Centre lot > 1 x Municipal Depot lot > 1 x Emergency Services lot > 32 x Light Industry/Mixed Business lots > 2 x Community Purpose lots > 1 x Tourism/Caravan Park lot > 171 x R20 Residential lots > 122 x R40 Residential lots > 6 x public open spaces.

1.4 Proposed Irrigation Areas As outlined in the approved District and Local Water Management Strategy (DLWMS - Cardno, 2013), the intention is to use public open space (POS) and other landscaped areas as the primary area for disposal of treated wastewater. In addition, the primary school playing field and irrigation of gardens within tourism sites will be capable of taking some of the water. This section only considers retention and infiltration areas proposed within POS. Swales and bio-retention areas and infiltration in non-development areas such as natural depressions are not included as these are not proposed to be used for irrigation. The areas of POS approved within Stage 1 is described in Table 1. The POS numbers relate to those shown on Figure 1.

Table 1 Extract of POS Schedule from Endorsed ODP

POS No. Stage Size (ha) Indicative Purpose (ODP)

1 1A,3,6 25.5137 Coastal dunal system and natural areas of Assume approx. drainage and habitat protection. Low key passive 8.5ha per stage recreation, with strategic access to the beach including turfed nodes with car parking and amenities. Excludes foreshore reserve which may include similar amenities at strategic access points. 2 1A 12.06 Buffer for Crown Reserve and protection of important flora and vegetation communities. Possible low key passive recreation - walk trails, viewing locations, interpretive stops. 4 1A 1.143 Infiltration basin, vegetation retention, parkland 5 1A 0.8745 Infiltration basin, vegetation retention, parkland 9 1A 0.5089 Parkland

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 1 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

POS No. Stage Size (ha) Indicative Purpose (ODP)

12 1B 1.2746 Infiltration depression, vegetation retention, parkland Total Stage 1 POS 24.361 Includes areas allocated for conservation Primary School site 1A 2 School oval and grounds approximate area (subject 4.737ha to design and layout of school) Total including school oval 26.361

The proposed management of stormwater is described in the DLWMS. Post development surface water runoff was modelled for the 1 year-1 hour, 5 year and 100 year ARI critical duration storm events. Vegetated retention areas (including bio-pockets and swales within road reserves, and vegetated retention areas within POS and undeveloped areas) will be used to retain stormwater. Due to the highly permeable sand soils and the large separation to groundwater, rapid infiltration rates are expected. Table 2 summarises the areas of POS to be provided in Stage 1, the areas within them that will be used for infiltration of stormwater up to a 100 year ARI storm event, and the balance of land in each POS that would be available to receive irrigation of treated wastewater. From this it can be seen that there will be more than ample area available within POS to receive irrigation. In addition, the primary school site will use treated wastewater for irrigation of the school oval. The total POS available in Stage 1 to receive irrigation will be around 20.5ha, plus the primary school site.

Table 2 Unencumbered Areas Available for Irrigation

POS No. Stage Size (ha) Area for Balance (ha) Infiltation** (m2)

1 1A 8.5 2,860 7.764 2 1A 12.06 5,950 11.465 5 1A 0.8745 6,775 0.197 9 1A 0.5089 - 0.5089 12 1B 1.2746 7,100 0.5646 Total 23.218 22,685 20.499 Primary School site 4.737ha 1A 2 (assumed) 2 2 Total including school oval 25.218 24,685 22.499 * Note: Primary school site will not be cleared until construction of the school and oval takes place. Timing at the discretion of the Department of Education. It is assumed that approximately 2ha of the site will be taken up by the playing fields. Exact areas of extant vegetation that will be cleared within each POS will only be determined at the stage of detailed design and subject, if required, to obtaining clearance approvals. ** Based on estimated basin top areas within POS for each post-development sub-catchment identified in the DLWMS. It is proposed that POS areas will be irrigated with treated recycled wastewater. This will reduce the total required water for the development, which would otherwise need to be provided by groundwater. Through this strategy, the amount of groundwater allocation that needs to be secured is reduced. See Figures 3 and 4 for POS conceptual designs. Figure 3 is indicative of a typical park showing how existing vegetation can be incorporated. Figure 4 is indicative of a coastal access node. The development will have a primary school situated on a 4.7ha lot. It is proposed that the irrigation requirements of the school will also be achieved through treated recycled wastewater and the Department of Education has indicated a willingness to accept this.

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 2 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

2 Vegetation

Broad regional information indicates that the area is located within the Swan Coastal Plain Subregion Drummond Botanical Subdistrict. The vegetation is broadly categorised as Banksia low woodland on leached sands with Melaleuca swamps on ill-drained soils and woodlands of Tuart (Eucalyptus gomphocephala), Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) and Marri (Corymbia calophylla) on less leached soils (Beard, 1990). Regional vegetation complex mapping undertaken by Heddle et. al. 1986 for parts of Western Australia indicates that the study area is primarily within the Quindalup Complex. The description given for the Quindalup Complex is: “Coastal dune complex consisting mainly of two alliances, the strand and fore dune alliance and the mobile and stable dune alliance. Local variations include low closed forest of Melaleuca lanceolata – Collistris preissii and closed scrub of Acacia rostellifera”. A flora and vegetation survey of the site was conducted in November 1992 (Alan Tingay and Associates 1993). This survey did not reveal any significant or protected flora or vegetation, however suggested that "significant stands of Allocasurina lehmanniana could be protected as much as possible within open space along the top of the Moore River Southern riverbank". In addition, the survey noted a feature could be made of some or all of the Tuart grove which also has an understorey of A. lehmanniana.

2.1 Vegetation Condition In late 2009 Cardno conducted a detailed spring flora and vegetation in accordance with the Environmental Protection Authority's (EPA) Guidance Statement No.51 Terrestrial Flora and Vegetation Surveys for Environmental Impact Assessment in Western Australia (EPA 2004a) across the ODP area. The survey included three separate visits, and also identified the flora species present within the survey area and the condition of the vegetation. Vegetation condition ranged from ‘Completely Degraded’ to ‘Pristine-Excellent’ with a majority of the vegetation in either a ‘Completely Degraded’ or ‘Pristine-Excellent’ condition. Whilst the mapping does not cover the entire eastern area within the revised ODP boundary, field observations and observations of the aerial imagery indicate that the vegetation condition is comparable to those mapped and largely represent ‘Completely Degraded’ condition vegetation. The ODP has aimed to to preserve, where possible, areas of ‘Pristine-Excellent’ condition vegetation. The ODP boundary includes 96.3% of the mapped ‘Completely Degraded’ condition vegetation as well as roughly 36ha of unmapped degraded vegetation. Areas of ‘Completely Degraded’ condition consisted of cleared paddock and tracks east of the foreshore reserve. The coastal foreshore reserve is in an ‘Excellent’ to ‘Pristine-Excellent’ condition. The river foreshore area is in a ‘Good’ to ‘Very Good’ condition. Remaining patches of remnant vegetation east of the foreshore reserve were in a ‘Degraded’ to ‘Very Good’ condition. Figure 5 shows how vegetation condition was assessed, with the approved subdivision plan overlaid. From this is can be seen that the majority of proposed future lots are on land that is completed degraded and degraded. Significant areas of the Pristine/Excellent vegetation will be within the proposed foreshore reserve and and public open space. Within Stage 1, POS areas 5 and 9 will be created on completedly degraded and good condition vegetation respectively. As indicated on Table 1, POS 5 will retain some vegetation, specifically some remnant trees, but will be largely free of design constraints. POS 9 will be entirely parkland. POS 1 will be maintained as coastal reserve, with a small access node similar to the type shown in Figure 4. Vegetation clearing will be minimised wherever possible. No specific plant community can be recommended for retention as all plant communities have been determined to be Priority 3 Ecological Communities, therefore all represent the same conservation significance.

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 3 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

2.2 Plant Communities Figure 6 shows plant communities mapped with the approved subdivision overlaid. A total of 138 native and 36 weed species were recorded, comprising 54 families and 118 genera. Eight broad plant communities have been described for the study area, which are: 1. OaSc - Low Scrub B of Olearia axillaris and Scaevola crassifolia over Open Herbs of *Trachyandra divaricata *Tetragonia decumbens, *Cakile maritima, *Pelargonium capitatum, Hardenbergia comptoniana and Conostylis candicans on foredunes with Spinifex longifolius and Ficinia nodosa; 2. ArAp - Dense Thicket to Thicket of Acacia rostellifera over Low Scrub B of Acanthocarpus preissii over Open Low Grass of *Bromus diandrus, *Lolium rigidum and Poa porphyroclados, Open Herbs of Calandrinia sp. Southwest Coast, *Dischisma arenarium, Carpobrotus virescens, and *Tetragonia decumbens on lower slopes and within swales; 3. AlEg - Scrub of Allocasuarina lehmanniana subsp. lehmanniana, Spyridium globulosum and Myoporum insulare with emergent pockets of Low woodland A to Open Low Woodland A of Eucalyptus gomphocephala over Low Scrub B of Acacia lasiocarpa, Olearia axillaris and Leucopogon parviflorus over Low Open Sedges of Lepidosperma gladiatum with *Bromus diandrus and Austrostipa flavescens, Parietaria debilis, Senecio pinnatifolius, *Trachyandra divaricata, Daucus glochidiatus, *Crassula glomerata and Trachymene pilosa; 4. MsAlSg - Heath A to Dwarf Scrub C of Melaleuca systena, Acacia lasiocarpa, Spyridium globulosum and Calothamnus quadrifidus with occasional pockets of Low Woodland A of Eucalyptus gomphocephala and Low Woodland B of Banksia attenuata over Open Herbs of Lomandra maritima, Parietaria debilis, Phyllanthus calycinus, Poranthera microphylla, Senecio pinnatifolius and Trachymene pilosa; 5. MsAlAp - Low Heath B of Melaleuca systena, Acacia lasiocarpa, Acanthocarpus preissii and Calothamnus quadrifidus with occasional pockets of Low Woodland B of Banksia attenuata or Thicket to Scrub of Acacia rostellifera in the swales over Open Herbs of Conostylis candicans, Desmocladus asper and Heliophila pusilla, Lepidosperma pubisquameum, *Bromus diandrus and Poa porphyroclados on cream-grey shallow sands over limestone; 6. McSg - Thicket of Melaleuca cardiophylla, Spyridium globulosum, Leucopogon insularis and Acanthocarpus preissii over Low Grasses *Bromus diandrus, *Lolium rigidum and *Ehrharta longiflora with Desmocladus asper, Calandrinia sp. Southwest Coast, Stylidium maritimum (P3), Hibbertia spicata subsp. leptotheca (P3) and Beyeria cinerea subsp. cinerea (P3) on grey-brown shallow sands over limestone. This plant community was recorded along the southern bank of Moore River to the east of the large blow-out; 7. MsMhBs - Heath A to Dwarf Scrub C of Melaleuca systena/Melaleuca huegelii, Banksia sessilis, Spyridium globulosum, Templetonia retusa, Acacia truncata and Hakea lissocarpha over Open Herbs of Calandrinia brevipedata, Podotheca gnaphalioides and Trachymene coerulea subsp. coerulea with Austrostipa flavescens, Poa porphyroclados, *Bromus diandrus and Ehrharta villosa on dark greybrown sand over limestone; and 8. MhMtMs - Low Heath C recently burnt (3-5 years) of Melaleuca huegelii/Acacia truncata, Melaleuca systena and Banksia sessilis, over Very Open Herbs of Desmocladus asper, Stylidium junceum, Calandrinia sp. Two-rocks, Carpobrotus virescens, *Crassula glomerata, and Gompholobium tomentosum with *Bromus diandrus and Poa porphyroclados on grey- brown shallow sands over limestone. * Refers to species that are known weeds. Both POS 5 and POS 9 in Stage 1 are located within community OaSc that has been cleared for paddocks. The portion of POS 1 within Stage 1 will conserve community MsAISg in Excellent/Pristine condition.

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 4 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

2.3 Significant Flora Species of flora are prescribed as “Declared Rare” or “Priority” conservation status where populations are restricted geographically or threatened by local processes. DBCA recognises these threats and subsequently applies regulations towards population protection and species conservation. DBCP enforces regulations under the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 to conserve Declared Rare Flora (DRF) and protect significant populations. Priority flora (PF) species are potentially rare or threatened and are classified in order of threat. The flora survey undertaken by ATA Environmental in 1993 did not identify any listed DRF species. Three PF species were recorded as present on the site, being: > Stylidium maritimum (P3); > Hibbertia spicata subsp. leptotheca (P3); and > Beyeria cinerea subsp. cinerea (P3). These species are all within the foreshore reserve to be created adjacent to the Moore River and will not be subject to irrigation. Additionally, significant local flora Allocasuarina lehmanniana subsp. lehmanniana, Marianthus erubescens and Thomasia triphylla were recorded, which are not uncommon species, but represent the extent of their ranges or unusual coastal distributions. These species are found over a number of plant communities within the subject site including MsAlSg, MsAlAp, AlEg, McSg and MhMtMs (refer to Figure 6). There are no pristine, excellent or good condition examples of these communities within Stage 1. These species do not have statutory protection under the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950, and therefore they do not represent a constraint over the site. DBCA advises that “special consideration should be given to the management of priority flora as they are conservation significance”.

2.4 Threatened Ecological Communities In Western Australia, ‘Threatened Ecological Communities’ (TECs) are defined by the Western Australian TEC Scientific Advisory Committee and are assigned to categories of Priority 1 to Priority 5. While they are not afforded direct statutory protection at a State level (unlike DRF under the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950) their significance is acknowledged through other State environmental approval processes (Environmental Impact Assessment pursuant to Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986). Selected TECs are also afforded statutory protection at a Federal level pursuant to the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The EPBC Act provides for the strong protection of TECs, which are listed under section 181 of the Act, and are defined as “Critically Endangered”, “Endangered” or “Vulnerable” under Section 182. A search was conducted of the TEC database and no known occurrences of TECs were recorded within the boundary of the ODP. In addition to listing as a TEC, a community may be listed as a Priority Ecological Community (PEC). An ecological community that is under consideration for listing as a TEC, but does not yet meet survey criteria or has not been adequately defined, is placed on the list of PECs. No PECs have been recorded within the study area.

2.5 Environmentally Sensitive Areas Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) are areas prescribed under the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004. As a result ESAs are only considered when a clearing permit is required under these regulations. ESAs have been identified to protect the native vegetation values of areas surrounding significant, threatened or scheduled ecosystems and communities.

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 5 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

A search of the Native Vegetation Mapping database revealed that the Moore River is listed as an ESA and that this area partially overlaps the northern part of the ODP area within the Moore River foreshore reserve. No area proposed to be irrigated is affected, and no clearing of this area is proposed as part of the wastewater treatement or water supply proposal.

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 6 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

3 Irrigation Assessment and Control

The following best practice initiatives and maintenance practices will be implemented as part of continual system evaluation in order to manage the irrigation system: > Irrigation rates will not exceed max allowable for sandy soils. > Nutrient load will not exceed max allowable for sandy soils. > Monitoring and recording of system flow rates using an automatic flow meter. > Monthly system field checks to ensure problems are addressed in a timely manner (if any) > Monthly water samples to confirm water quality > Management of pump stations to ensure adequate distribution of irrigation > Aquasol staff in charge will be correctly trained and proper PEE to be used onsite. > Conduct routine maintenance of the irrigation system for optimum performance > Inspection of the pumping station, and conduct pump/motor maintenance > Ten groundwater bores installed to provide the best representation of the groundwater system and water quality at the site. Refer enclosed to Attachment 9A - Monitoring Bores. > Each sprinkler used for irrigation will be fitted with a control valve, solenoid, and latching relay to provide equal flow and limit ponding. The total number of sprinklers required for the system will be determined during the detailed engineering design phase for the WWTP. > Direct stormwater to vegetated (with native wetland species) treatment areas including swales, bio-pockets and vegetation retention areas.. > Garden beds should not be located immediately adjacent to the infiltration or vegetated retention areas to reduce nutrient transportation into these areas. > The quality of the treated water from the WWTP discharged will be high. > Adherence to the Drinking Water Source Protection Plan (RPS) will be maintained. > Surface Runoff Catchment in place.

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 7 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

4 Conclusions

Environmental information including the type and character of vegetation informed the revision of the ODP from the 2000 version. The reiterative process allowed for the design to recognise the environmental features of the site. The findings concluded that the development would have no environmental impact on the Moore River. The presence of significant areas of remnant vegetation, including vegetation in “Excellent” and “Pristine-Excellent” condition, and significant flora species was taken into account in the ODP design process. Public open space has been strategically allocated to retain significant remnant vegetation, habitat trees and wildlife corridors. It is envisaged that the areas of POS will maintain and enhance the environmental integrity of the subject site and provide opportunities for recreation and community interaction. Within Stage 1, areas proposed for irrigation do not provide a risk to significant vegetation. The design minimises modifications to the topography and landscape, which will help facilitate vegetation retention, reduce risks of erosion and sand mobilisation and minimise the need for imported fill. The future planning and development process will detail measures to effect the long term protection of the environmental features and/or to minimise the impacts of development. A Foreshore Management Plan including the Moore River foreshore reserve and POS has already been prepared and approved as a pre-condition of the subdivision approval. Other measures to be undertaken/prepared during future stages of development are likely to include: > Fire Management > Revegetation, Rehabilitation and Landscaping Plan > Dust Management Plan > Landscape Strategy > Construction Management Plan > Memorials on title > Local Development Plans > Design guidelines > Management frameworks

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 8 Stage 1 Vegetation Overview Moore River South

5 References

Alan Tingay and Associates, Vertebrate Fauna Survey, November 1997 Alan Tingay and Associates, South Guilderton Envrionmental Assessment, unpublished Cardno, Moore River Environmental Assessment and Justification Report, April 2010 Cardno, Moore River South District and Local Water Management Strategy, 2013 Cardno, Moore River South Flora and Vegetation Assessment, 2010 Cardno, Moore River South Outline Development Plan, 2013 Harewood, Greg, Fauna Habitat Impact Assessent Moore River, 2010 M P Rogers and Associates Pty Ltd, Moore River South Coastal Engineering Study, March 1996 M P Rogers and Associates Pty Ltd, Moore River Coastal Setbacks Amendments to Draft SPP 2.6, September 2012 Masterplan Consultants, Moore River South Outline Development Plan, 12 January 2000 URS Australia Pty Ltd, H3 Level Hydrogeological Assessment - Groundwater Licence Application, 27 March 2013 URS Australia Pty Ltd, Water Resource Management Operating Strategy, 27 March 2013

Prepared for Moore River Company Page 9

Moore River South

01

FIGURES

Screening planting along POS boundary

Native planting to be used within POS

Mounding to add definition to landscape Local play space Main plaza space with shade structures, BBQ & seating facilities A

A Large trees to define POS boundary

Pedestrian path around perimeter

Garden bed to include native groundcovers and shrubs

Grassed kick-about area Timber deck viewing platform

Large shelter on viewing platform with seating Drainage Swale Area for temporary water detention

Path to bridge over Native sedges suitable drainage swale for periodic inundation

Bio-filtration pocket to include native reeds and sedges Mounding to add definition to landscape

B Main pedestrian access path

Trees to define park boundary

Entry plaza with seating B wall PUBLIC OPEN SPACE EXAMPLE

landscape architecture THE MOORE RIVER COMPANY PTY LTD MOORE RIVER DISTRICT & LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY urban design 0 5 10 15 25m DATE DRAWING NO ISSUE environmental management SCALE 1:500 @ A3 16.09.13 SP131601-002SP B

XREF's: CAD File: G:\Planning\2007\P7026 Moore Rive Subdivision\Drawings\01\P7026-CI-01-SK01.dwg DATE PLOTTED: 17 July 2017 11:48 AM BY : MATTHEW REDWAY LEGEND: VEGETATION CONDITION 1A BLOWOUT DEGRADED EXCELLENT PRISTINE /EXCELLENT PUBLIC OPENSPACE COMPLETELY DEGRADED GOOD STAGE NUMBER STAGE BOUNDARY VERY GOOD/ VERY GOOD Fi g r Ve - 5 ure 2 g tto Condition etation 1A 1A 3 0 SCALE 1:10000 200 3 @A3 400m 6 4

NORTH 1A This documentis producedbyCardnoLimited in accordancewith thetermsofretainer. solely forthebenefit ofandusebytheclient whatsoever toany thirdpartyarisingoutof any use or reliancebythird partyonthe Cardno Limited does notandshall assume anyresponsibility orliability content of thisdocument. All RightsReserved. © CardnoLimited 5 5 Cardno (WA)Pty Ltd|ABN77009119000 Tel: 089273 3888Fax: 0894868664 Web: www.cardno.com.au West PerthWA 6005 11 HarvestTerrace 1B ® rwn ubrRevision Drawing Number Datum LAYOUT PLAN VEGETATION CONDITION FLORA ANDVEGETATION ASSESSMENT MOORE RIVERSOUTH MOORE RIVERCOMPANY PTYLTD ...1/71 1:5000 17/07/17 A.H.D. 72-I0-K1A P7026-CI-01-SK01 Date Scale Size A3 XREF's: CAD File: G:\Planning\2007\P7026 Moore Rive Subdivision\Drawings\01\P7026-CI-01-SK02.dwg DATE PLOTTED: 17 July 2017 11:47 AM BY : MATTHEW REDWAY LEGEND: 1A PADDOCKS BLOWOUT PUBLIC OPENSPACE STAGE NUMBER STAGE BOUNDARY Fi g r Ve - 6 ure 2 g tto Communities etation 1A 1A 3 0 SCALE 1:10000 200 3 @A3 400m 6 4

NORTH 1A PLANT COMMUNITIES This documentis producedbyCardnoLimited in accordancewith thetermsofretainer. solely forthebenefit ofandusebytheclient whatsoever toany thirdpartyarisingoutof any use or reliancebythird partyonthe Cardno Limited does notandshall assume anyresponsibility orliability content of thisdocument. All RightsReserved. © CardnoLimited 5 5 MhAtMs -LowHeathCrecentlyburnt(3-5years)ofMelaleucahuegelii/Acaciatruncata,systenaandBanksiasessilis, Poa porphyroclados,*BromusdiandrusandEhrhartavillosaondarkgrey-brownsandoverlimestone; MsMhBs -HeathAtoDwarfScrubCofMelaleucasystena/Melaleucahuegelii,Banksiasessilis,Spyridium Desmocladus asper,Calandriniasp.SouthwestCoast,Stylidiummaritimum(P3),Hibbertiaspicatasubsp. McSg -ThicketofMelaleucacardiophylla,Spyridiumglobulosum,Leucopogoninsularisand MsAlAp -LowHeathBofMelaleucasystena,Acacialasiocarpa,AcanthocarpuspreissiiandCalothamnusquadrifidus Phyllanthus calycinus,Porantheramicrophylla,SeneciopinnatifoliusandTrachymenepilosa; MsAlSg -HeathAtoDwarfScrubCofMelaleucasystena,Acacialasiocarpa,Spyridiumglobulosumand OaSc -LowScrubBofOleariaaxillarisandScaevolacrassifoliaoverOpenHerbs*Trachyandra brevipedata, PodothecagnaphalioidesandTrachymenecoeruleasubsp.withAustrostipaflavescens, leptotheca (P3)andBeyeriacinereasubsp.ongrey-brownshallowsandsoverlimestone; pubisquameum, *BromusdiandrusandPoaporphyrocladosoncream-greyshallowsandsoverlimestone; Calothamnus quadrifiduswithoccasionalpocketsofLowWoodlandAEucalyptusgomphocephala Grass of*Bromusdiandrus,*LoliumrigidumandPoaporphyroclados,OpenHerbsCalandriniasp.SouthwestCoast, pinnatifolius, *Trachyandradivaricata,Daucusglochidiatus,*CrassulaglomerataandTrachymenepilosa; insulare withemergentpocketsofLowwoodlandAtoOpenWoodlandEucalyptusgomphocephala comptoniana andConostyliscandicansonforeduneswithSpinifexlongifoliusFicinianodosa; divaricata *Tetragoniadecumbens,*Cakilemaritima,*Pelargoniumcapitatum,Hardenbergia and Gompholobiumtomentosumwith*BromusdiandrusPoaporphyrocladosongrey-brownshallowsandsoverlimestone. globulosum, Templetoniaretusa,AcaciatruncataandHakealissocarphaoverOpenHerbsofCalandrinia swales overOpenHerbsofConostyliscandicans,DesmocladusasperandHeliophilapusilla,Lepidosperma and LowWoodlandBofBanksiaattenuataoverOpenHerbsLomandramaritima,Parietariadebilis, *Dischisma arenarium,Carpobrotusvirescens,and*Tetragoniadecumbensonlowerslopeswithinswales; of Lepidospermagladiatumwith*BromusdiandrusandAustrostipaflavescens,Parietariadebilis,Senecio over LowScrubBofAcacialasiocarpa,OleariaaxillarisandLeucopogonparviflorusOpenSedges Very OpenHerbsofDesmocladusasper,Stylidiumjunceum,Calandriniasp.Two-rocks,Carpobrotusvirescens,*Crassulaglomerata, Acanthocarpus preissiioverLowGrasses*Bromusdiandrus,*Loliumrigidumand*Ehrhartalongiflorawith with occasionalpocketsofLowWoodlandBBanksiaattenuataorThickettoScrubAcaciarostelliferainthe ArAp -DenseThickettoofAcaciarostelliferaoverLowScrubBAcanthocarpuspreissiiOpen AlEg -ScrubofAllocasuarinalehmannianasubsp.lehmanniana,SpyridiumglobulosumandMyoporum Cardno (WA)Pty Ltd|ABN77009119000 Tel: 089273 3888Fax: 0894868664 Web: www.cardno.com.au West PerthWA 6005 11 HarvestTerrace 1B ® rwn ubrRevision Drawing Number Datum LAYOUT PLAN PLANT COMMUNITIES FLORA ANDVEGETATION ASSESSMENT MOORE RIVERSOUTH MOORE RIVERCOMPANY PTYLTD ...1/71 1:5000 17/07/17 A.H.D. 72-I0-K2A P7026-CI-01-SK02 Date Scale Size A3 over