DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing North America's Energy Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Developing North America's Energy Future DEVELOPING NORTH AMERICA’S ENERGY FUTURE 12 2012 Annual Report TransCanada Corporation 2012 Financial Highlights Net Income Attributable to Common Shares | $1.30 billion or $1.84 per share Comparable Earnings ­£® | $1.33 billion or $1.89 per share «>À>LiÊ >À}ÃÊLivÀiÊÌiÀiÃÌ]Ê/>ÝiÃ]Ê i«ÀiV>ÌÊ>`ÊÀÌâ>ÌÊ­£® | $4.2 billion Funds Generated from Operations ­£® | $3.3 billion >«Ì>Ê Ý«i`ÌÕÀiÃ]Ê µÕÌÞÊÛiÃÌiÌÃÊ>`ÊVµÕÃÌÃÊ NÊ $3.5 billion Ê- >ÀiÊ Û`i`ÃÊ iV>Ài`Ê NÊ $1.76 per share Net Income Attributable Comparable Earnings(1) Comparable EBITDA(1) Funds Generated from Capital Expenditures, Equity to Common Shares (millions of dollars) (millions of dollars) Operations(1) (millions of dollars) Investments and Acquisitions (millions of dollars) (millions of dollars) 2,000 2,000 5,000 5,000 8,000 4,544 4,245 1,526 1,559 1,600 1,600 4,000 3,686 4,000 6,400 1,357 3,451 1,299 1,330 3,284 1,233 3,161 4,973 1,200 1,200 3,000 3,000 4,800 3,146 3,461 800 800 2,000 2,000 3,200 400 400 1,000 1,000 1,600 0 0 0 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 Net Income per Share Comparable Earnings Dividends Declared Common Shares Market Price – Close (1) – Basic (dollars) per Share (dollars) per Share (dollars) Outstanding – Average Toronto Stock Exchange (millions of shares) (dollars) 3 3 3 1,000 50 47.02 44.53 2.22 37.99 2.17 800 40 691 702 705 1.96 1.89 2 1.84 2 2 1.77 1.76 1.68 1.60 600 30 400 20 1 1 1 200 10 0 0 0 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 (1) Non-GAAP measure that does not have any standardized meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For more information see Non-GAAP measures in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of the 2012 Annual Report. On the cover:Ê} ÌÃÊÕ>ÌiÊ >Ì >Ê* «ÃÊ-µÕ>ÀiÊÊ/ÀÌ]Ê"Ì>À]Ê >>`>°Ê/À>à >>`>ÊLÕ`ÃÊ>`Ê«iÀ>ÌiÃÊÃ>viÊ>`ÊÀi>LiÊ v>VÌiÃÊÌÊ`iÛiÀÊÌ iÊ>ÌÕÀ>Ê}>Ã]ÊiiVÌÀVÌÞÊ>`ÊÊÌ >ÌÊÃÊvÊ«i«iÊVÕÌÊÊiÛiÀÞÊ`>ÞÊÌÊ}Ê>LÕÌÊÌ iÀÊ`>ÞÊÛiðÊ/À>à >>`>Ê ÃÊ>ÊxäÊ«iÀÊViÌÊÜiÀÊvÊÌ iÊ*ÀÌ>`ÃÊ iÀ}ÞÊ iÌÀi]ÊV>«>LiÊvÊÃÕ««Þ}ÊÓxÊ«iÀÊViÌÊvÊ/À̽ÃÊiiVÌÀVÌÞÊii`ð Natural Gas Pipelines 21 Existing In Development Under Construction 20 Regulated Natural Gas Storage 27 Oil Pipelines Existing In Development Under Construction Crude Oil Terminal 34 19 Crude Oil Receipt Facility 49 30 35 21 1 2929 37 20 27 48 3 25 3 36 32 2 7 11 4 31 8 12 6 40 28 50 9 38 39 26 13 22 5 47 51 5 44 45 10 46 5 5a 43 42 24 41 23 33 18 Energy 16 Natural Gas Power Generation Coal Power Purchase Arrangements 15 Nuclear Power Generation 14 17 Wind Power Generation Solar Power Generation Hydro Power Generation Unregulated Natural Gas Storage 500 km N 200 mi In Development TC - 01 - 13 Existing Natural Gas Pipelines Oil Pipelines Energy Canadian Pipelines Canadian / U.S. Pipelines Canadian - Western Power 1 Alberta System 22 Keystone Pipeline System 30 Bear Creek 2 Canadian Mainline 31 Cancarb 3 Foothills Under Construction 32 Carseland 4 Trans Québec & Maritimes (TQM) 33 Coolidge1 23 Cushing Marketlink Receipt Facility 34 Mackay River 24 Gulf Coast Project U.S. Pipelines 35 Redwater 25 Keystone Hardisty Terminal 36 Sheerness PPA 5 ANR Pipeline 37 Sundance A PPA 5a ANR Regulated Natural Gas Storage In Development 37 Sundance B PPA 6 Bison 26 Bakken Marketlink Receipt Facility 7 Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) 27 Grand Rapids Pipeline Canadian - Eastern Power 8 Great Lakes 28 Keystone XL Pipeline 9 Iroquois 38 Bécancour 29 Northern Courier Pipeline 10 North Baja 39 Cartier Wind 11 Northern Border 40 Grandview 12 Portland 41 Halton Hills 13 Tuscarora 42 Portlands Energy Mexican Pipelines Bruce Power 14 Guadalajara 43 Bruce A 15 Tamazunchale 43 Bruce B Under Construction U.S. Power 16 Mazatlan Pipeline 44 Kibby Wind 17 Tamazunchale Pipeline Extension 45 Ocean State Power 18 Topolobampo Pipeline 46 Ravenswood 47 TC Hydro In Development Unregulated Natural Gas Storage 19 Alaska Pipeline Project 20 Coastal GasLink 48 CrossAlta 21 Prince Rupert Gas Transmission Project 49 Edson TransCanada’s Power Assets by Fuel Source In Development 21% 50 Napanee 21% Natural Gas Natural Gas/Oil 51 Ontario Solar 11,800 14% Nuclear Coal MW Hydro 5% Wind 4% 1 Located in Arizona, results reported in Canadian - Western Power 34% 1% Solar TransCanada produces close to 11,800 megawatts (MW) of electricity – enough to power nearly 12 million homes. DEVELOPING NORTH AMERICA’S ENERGY FUTURE Enormous change is underway in North America’s energy landscape. Advanced technology is unlocking significant oil and natural gas reserves once thought to be inaccessible. Some communities are realizing the benefits of energy development while others are grappling with the challenges that may occur. Demand for energy resources is booming from overseas markets as North America moves toward greater energy security and independence. This shift presents considerable investment opportunity for a company like TransCanada. The International Energy Agency predicts North America will require $6 trillion in new energy infrastructure by 2035 as aging facilities need to be replaced and energy products need to be transported to new and existing markets. With over 60 years’ experience delivering energy safely and reliably across the continent every day, we are leading this transformation and have embarked on a decade of unprecedented growth. Since 2010, we have placed $13 billion of new projects into service, including our Keystone oil pipeline that transports more than 500,000 barrels per day (bbl/d) of Canadian crude oil to markets in the United States, the refurbishment of two reactors at Bruce Power, one of the world’s largest nuclear power facilities, wind power developments in Canada and the United States, natural gas-fired power facilities on both sides of the border and further growth in our North American natural gas pipeline infrastructure. This past year saw us make significant progress in pturingca new investment opportunities that included $16 billion in new projects. This brings our total of secured capital projects to $25 billion, $12 billion of which are in the advanced stages of development and expected on-line by 2015. This $25 billion capital program includes the significant expansion of our Keystone System, additional oil pipelines to service growing production in Alberta’s oil sands, two potential pipelines across northern British Columbia to connect the emerging liquefied natural gas export market, major expansions to Mexico’s natural gas pipeline system, and solar power facilities in Ontario along with a large, clean-burning, natural gas-fired power plant. 2012 Annual Report TransCanada Corporation TransCanada has secured $25 billion worth of projects scheduled for completion by the end of the decade – $12 billion of which are expected on-line by 2015. Delivering these capital projects on time and on budget will generate significant value for our shareholders. Getting there will require discipline and commitment as we build upon our strong foundation of existing assets, talented people and financial capacity. Unparalleled asset base We are focused on maximizing the value of our existing energy infrastructure assets. TransCanada owns or has interests in $48 billion of long-life assets – primarily pipelines and power generation facilities – in Canada, the United States and Mexico. We operate one of the largest natural gas transmission networks on the continent, a 68,500-kilometre (km) (42,500-mile) system that taps into virtually every major supply basin and transports approximately 20 per cent of North America’s daily natural gas needs. We are also one of the largest providers of natural gas storage and related services, with more than 400 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of capacity. Through our energy business, we own or have interests in 21 facilities that have the capacity to generate 11,800 megawatts (MW) of electricity, enough to power more than 12 million homes. Our Keystone Pipeline transports almost one- quarter of Canada’s crude oil exports to the United States, and has moved more than 350 million barrels safely and efficiently since it began operating in 2010. The best talent Our employees are the heart of our competitive advantage. We have approximately 4,900 dedicated employees across North America who are an important part of the communities where we operate in seven Canadian provinces, 31 U.S. and five Mexican states. Our path forward lies in these committed and motivated people living our company’s values of integrity, collaboration, responsibility and innovation. Our employees and contractors enable us to achieve our best-in-class records for injury rates, operational safety and environmental performance. Financial strength and flexibility We are well positioned to fund our ongoing capital program with growing cash flow from new assets placed into service, an ‘A’ grade credit rating and a strong balance sheet. Maintaining our financial capacity and flexibility is critical to ensure we can always access capital to meet our needs. Over the last decade, we’ve invested $38 billion in long-term assets that have led to significant and stable growth in earnings, cash flow and dividends and a total annualized return to shareholders of 13.3 per cent per year since 2000. Looking forward, cash flow generated from operations is expected to grow as $12 billion of new assets begin contributing by 2015, and a further $13 billion are expected to be completed by the end of the decade.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generation Capacity and Production
    GENERATION CAPACITY AND PRODUCTION NET GENERATION NET GENERATION (GWh) HYDROELECTRIC CAPACITY (MW) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Central Operations 124 668 493 564 692 645 Includes 26 stations, headquarters in North Bay. Eastern Operations 2,571 14,517 12,535 12,241 13,281 12,774 Includes 10 stations, headquarters in Renfrew. Niagara Operations 2,278 11,250 12,015 12,547 12,267 12,372 Includes 5 stations, headquarters in Niagara area. Northeast Operations 1,809 3,584 3,779 4,057 3,802 3,359 Includes 14 stations, headquarters in Timmins. Northwest Operations 687 3,065 3,089 3,497 3,448 3,583 Includes 11 stations, headquarters in Thunder Bay. NET GENERATION NET GENERATION (GWh) NUCLEAR CAPACITY (MW) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Darlington Nuclear Generating Station Located on Lake Ontario in the Municipality of Clarington. The 2,634 19,250 25,619 23,293 27,960 25,051 station has four units. One unit was taken offline in October 2016 for refurbishment. Pickering Nuclear Generating Station Located on Lake Ontario in Pickering. The station has six 3,094 21,411 19,958 21,231 20,045 19,642 operating units and two units in a safe shutdown state. NET GENERATION NET GENERATION (GWh) (1) THERMAL CAPACITY (MW) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Atikokan Generating Station Located near the town of Atikokan in northwestern Ontario. The 205 138 149 109 10 -18 station has one biomass unit. The station stopped using coal in 2012. Brighton Beach (2) Located in Windsor. The station is a combined cycle generating 280 60 123 115 100 Not reported station fuelled by natural gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Workers Union
    October 20, 2020 Independent Electricity System Operator 1600-120 Adelaide Street West Toronto, ON M5H 1T1 Via email to [email protected] Re: Resource Adequacy Engagement CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, The Power Workers’ Union (“PWU”) represents a large portion of the employees LOCAL 1000, C.L.C. working in Ontario’s electricity industry. Attached please find a list of PWU employers. 244 EGLINTON AVE. E. TORONTO, ONTARIO The PWU appreciates the opportunity to provide input on the Resource Adequacy M4P 1K2 Engagement. The PWU is a strong supporter and advocate for the prudent and TEL.: (416) 481-4491 rational reform of Ontario’s electricity sector and recognizes the importance of low- FAX: (416) 481-7115 cost, low-carbon energy to the competitiveness of Ontario’s economic sectors. PRESIDENT Jeff Parnell The PWU believes that IESO processes and initiatives should deliver energy at the lowest reasonable cost while stimulating job creation and growing the province’s gross VICE PRESIDENTS Andrew Clunis domestic product (GDP). We are respectfully submitting our detailed observations Mike Hambly and recommendations. Tom Chessell We hope you will find the PWU’s comments useful. Yours very truly, Jeff Parnell President Printed on recycled and recyclable paper List of PWU Employers Abraflex (2004) Ltd. Alectra Utilities Algoma Power Aptum Atlantic Power Corporation - Calstock Power Plant Atlantic Power Corporation - Kapuskasing Power Plant Atlantic Power Corporation - Nipigon Power Plant Atura - Halton Hills Generating Station Atura - Napanee Generating Station Atura - Portlands Energy Centre Atura – Brighton Beach Generating Station Bracebridge Generation Brookfield Power Wind Operations Brookfield Renewable Power - Mississagi Power Trust Bruce Power Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Clean Path to Ozone Annex Compliance: Phasing out Ontario’S Coal-Fired Power Plants
    A Clean Path to Ozone Annex Compliance: Phasing Out Ontario’s Coal-Fired Power Plants Prepared by: Cliff Chen, Bruce Biewald, and David White Synapse Energy Economics 22 Pearl Street, Cambridge, MA 02139 www.synapse-energy.com 617-661-3248 Prepared for: The OntAIRio Campaign March 21, 2003 THE OntAIRio CAMPAIGN The production of this report was made possible though the generous financial support of the Salamander Foundation and the Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation. We would also like to express our appreciation for the support of the Climate Action Network of Canada (CANet). For additional copies of this report, please contact: Sierra Club of Canada 24 Mercer Street, Suite 102 Toronto, ON M5V 1H3 (416) 960-9606 [email protected] Table of Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................. 1 2. Ontario’s Aging Coal Fleet .......................................................................................... 3 3. A Clean Alternative ...................................................................................................... 6 4. Coal Phase Out Scenario............................................................................................ 10 5. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................15 References........................................................................................................................ 17 Appendix A: Explanation
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Toronto's Electricity Supply Needs
    ONTARIO CLEAN AIR QUALITY ISSUES FACT SHEET #19 AIR ALLIANCE A comparison of the Meeting Toronto’s ▼ Portlands Energy www.cleanairalliance.org Electricity Supply Centre and the Needs: Toronto Waterfront Clean Energy Centre Toronto is one of the largest cities in North America that has no significant electricity generation capacity within its own vicinity — the city generates just 1.2% of the power used within its boundaries while using close to 20% of the power produced in Ontario. Currently, the central city south of Eglinton (between Hwy. 427 and Victoria Park) receives almost its entire electricity supply via two Hydro One transmission corridors. This leaves the city highly reliant on large centralized supply sources outside of the city, such as the Pickering and Darlington nuclear stations and the giant Nanticoke coal-fired station on Lake Erie. It has been widely recognized that this current power structure leaves the city highly vulnerable to power disrup- tions while also creating serious system inefficiencies. To address this imbalance, efforts are underway to locate new generation capacity within the city, while also improving overall energy efficiency (Toronto Hydro, for exam- ple, has set a goal of reducing peak demand in Toronto by 5% by 2007). This, in turn, has led to two proposals to build new generation facilities on the eastern waterfront: • The Portlands Energy Centre (PEC) is a joint venture of Ontario Power Generation and TransCanada that is proposing to build a 550 megawatt (MW) combined-cycle* natural gas power plant near the site of the mothballed Hearn Generating Station. The PEC plan has undergone a complete environmental assess- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • MRP Report V4
    GENERATING CHANGE: SUSTAINABLE ADAPTIVE REUSE OF URBAN POWER PLANTS IN-DEPTH CASE STUDIES AND PLANNING IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HEARN, TORONTO by Julia Smith MA, Maastricht University, 2011 BA, University of Toronto, 2009 A Major Research Paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Planning in Urban Development Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Julia Smith 2015 Author’s Declaration for Electronic Submission of a MRP I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purposes of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. ii GENERATING CHANGE: SUSTAINABLE ADAPTIVE REUSE OF URBAN POWER PLANTS IN-DEPTH CASE STUDIES AND PLANNING IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HEARN, TORONTO © Julia Smith 2015 Master of Planning in Urban Development Ryerson University ABSTRACT Cities across the western world are making the transition away from coal energy, and towards greener methods of power generation; as a result, abandoned power plants, including Toronto’s Richard L. Hearn Power Generation Station, are now features of many post-industrial urban landscapes. Largely out of use since 1983, the Hearn has seen a variety of redevelopment concepts over the last 30 years, but recent initiatives to revitalize Toronto’s Waterfront and industrial Port Lands have spurred renewed interest in the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Capacity and Production
    GENERATING CAPACITY AND PRODUCTION GENERATING ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION (GWh) CAPACITY (MW) at Dec. 31, 2019 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 HYDROELECTRIC, SOLAR & WIND Central Operations − Hydroelectric − − − 668 493 564 OPG moved from five to four Ontario operating regions in 2018. Eagle Creek Renewable Energy Includes 85 hydroelectric stations and minority shareholdings in 13 hydroelectric 627 1,239 105 − − − stations and two solar facilities. Headquarters in Morristown, New Jersey. OPG acquired Eagle Creek in 2018. Eastern Operations − Hydroelectric 2,625 13,218 13,185 14,517 12,535 12,241 Includes 22 hydroelectric stations. Headquarters in Renfrew, Ontario. Nanticoke Solar 44 58 − − − − Solar facility located in Haldimand County, Ontario. In−service as of 2019. Northeast Operations − Hydroelectric 1,846 3,243 4,019 3,584 3,779 4,057 Includes 21 hydroelectric stations. Headquarters in Timmins, Ontario. Northwest Operations − Hydroelectric 687 3,367 2,892 3,065 3,089 3,497 Includes 11 hydroelectric stations. Headquarters in Thunder Bay, Ontario. Pickering Wind Turbine (Retired) − 0 2 2 3 3 Previously located in Pickering, Ontario. The turbine was dismantled in 2019. South Central Operations − Hydroelectric 2,319 12,534 12,174 11,250 12,015 12,547 Includes 12 hydroelectric stations. Headquarters in Niagara area, Ontario. NUCLEAR Darlington Nuclear Generating Station Located in the Municipality of Clarington, Ontario. The station has four units. One 2,634 19,860 20,029 19,250 25,619 23,293 unit was taken offline in October 2016 for refurbishment. Pickering Nuclear Generating Station Located in Pickering, Ontario. The station has six operating units and two units in 3,094 23,605 20,850 21,411 19,958 21,231 a safe shutdown state.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004 Corporate Profile
    Annual Report 2004 Corporate Profile Ontario Power Generation Inc. is an Ontario-based electricity generation company whose principal business is the generation and sale of electricity in Ontario and to interconnected markets. Our focus is on the efficient production and sale of electricity from our generation assets, while operating in a safe, open and environmentally responsible manner. In 2004, OPG generated 105 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity. OPG’s electricity generating portfolio, as of December 31, 2004, had a total in-service capacity of 22,790 megawatts (MW), which consisted of: • three nuclear stations with a capacity of 6,103 MW (excludes Pickering A, Units 2 and 3, which have a capacity of 1,030 MW and are currently laid up) and Pickering A, Unit 1, with a capacity of 515 MW, currently being returned to service; • six fossil-fuelled stations with a capacity of 9,718 MW; • 64 hydroelectric stations with a capacity of 6,962 MW; • three wind power stations (which includes OPG’s 50 per cent interest in the Huron Wind joint venture) with a capacity of 7 MW. OPG co-owns one gas-fired station with ATCO Power Canada Ltd. and ATCO Resources Ltd. In addition, OPG has leased two nuclear stations on a long-term basis to Bruce Power L.P. Contents 2 Message from the Chairman and the President 74 Board of Directors 10 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 74 Governance 44 Consolidated Financial Statements 76 Officers 48 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Ontario Power Generation Facilities – see inside back cover Electricity Terms One megawatt (MW) is one million watts.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication from Kevin Dick, General Manager, Portlands Energy Centre
    PG23.6.6 ­ PG23.6.6 Portlands Energy Centre 470 Unwin Ave, Toronto ON M4M 389 PH: 416.462.8670 www.portlandsenergycentre.com Planning and Growth Management Committee 10°1 Floor, West, City Hall October 11, 2017 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H2N2 To whom it may concern: Re: Draft Official Plan Amendment - The Port Lands I am writing you on behalf of Portlands Energy Center ("PEC") as a tenant of Ontario Power Generation Inc. ("OPG") in connection with its properties located at 470 Unwin Avenue (the Po1tlands Energy Centre) located in the Central Waterfront Secondaiy Plan Area. As OPG's tenant PEC has been copied on the correspondence to date that OPG has provided the City of Toronto regarding the Official Plan Amendment for the Pott Lands. Specifically, PEC was copied on the correspondence that occurred on April 12, 2017 and May 25, 201 7. However, PEC wished to advise you independently that we share some of the concerns with the proposed Official Plan Amendment. Kindly accept this letter, which details PEC's concerns regarding the proposed amendments to the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan ("CWS Plan") concerning lands located within the area known as the Pott Lands. In reviewing the draft Official Plan Amendment for the Pott Lands ("Draft OPA") there are a number of concerns that PEC identified and had previously discussed with the City of Toronto in their consultation in advance of the publication of the Draft OPA. Specifically, the Draft OPA does not recognize the existing land uses by PEC on OPG's lands which are leased by PEC.
    [Show full text]
  • EB-2012-0451/EB-2012-0433/EB-2013-0074 Exhibit M.IESO.GEC.1 Page 1 of 1
    EB-2012-0451/EB-2012-0433/EB-2013-0074 Exhibit M.IESO.GEC.1 Page 1 of 1 INDEPENDENT ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATOR RESPONSE TO GREEN ENERGY COALITION INTERROGATORY #1 INTERROGATORY Issue A.1. Reference IESO Letter, June 28, 2013 Questions Please identify the witnesses who will sponsor the evidence, and explain their relationship to the documents in the Appendices to the letter (e.g., author, familiar with the development of the document, no relationship) RESPONSE The IESO witnesses are: Dan Rochester, Manager – Reliability Assessments. Mr. Rochester’s relationship with the documents in the Appendices to the letter is as follows: o Appendix 1 – limited review and limited familiarity with the content o Appendices 2 and 6 – no relationship o Appendices 3 to 5 - author David Robitaille, Manager – Operational Effectiveness. Mr. Robitaille’s relationship with the documents in the Appendices to the letter is as follows: o Appendix 1, 2 and 6 – no relationship o Appendices 3 to 5 – familiar with the content EB-2012-0451/EB-2012-0433/EB-2013-0074 Exhibit M.IESO.GEC.2 Page 1 of 1 INDEPENDENT ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATOR RESPONSE TO GREEN ENERGY COALITION INTERROGATORY #2 INTERROGATORY Issue A.1. Reference IESO Letter, June 28, 2013 Questions Please provide the equivalent of Table 1 for “Capability at Winter Peak.” RESPONSE The Forecast Capability at 2013/2014 Winter Peak is included and provided in the last column of the table below: Total Forecast Change in Forecast Installed Capability at Number Installed Change in Capability at Fuel Type Capacity
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Various Methods of Power Generation in Ontario
    GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH VARIOUS METHODS OF POWER GENERATION IN ONTARIO October 2016 Prepared For: Ontario Power Generation Inc. 700 University Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z5 6605 Hurontario Street , Suite 500, Mississauga, Ontario ▪ L5T 0A3 Tel: 905-364-7800 ▪ Fax: 905-364-7816 ▪ www.intrinsik.com DISCLAIMER Intrinsik Corp. (hereafter referred to as Intrinsik) provided this report to Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG) solely for the purpose stated in the report. Intrinsik does not accept any responsibility for the use of this report for any purpose other than as specifically intended by OPG. Intrinsik does not have, and does not accept, any responsibility or duty of care whether based in negligence or otherwise, in relation to the use of this report in whole or in part by any third party. Any alternate use, including that by a third party, or any reliance on or decision made based on this report, are the sole responsibility of the alternative user or third party. Intrinsik does not accept responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. Intrinsik makes no representation, warranty or condition with respect to this report or the information contained herein other than that it has exercised reasonable skill, care and diligence in accordance with accepted practice and usual standards of thoroughness and competence for the profession of toxicology and environmental science to assess and evaluate information acquired during the preparation of this report. Any information or facts provided by others, and referred to or utilized in the preparation of this report, is believed to be accurate without any independent verification or confirmation by Intrinsik.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.05 Electricity Power System Planning
    Chapter 3 Ministry of Energy Section 3.05 Electricity Power System Planning 1.0 Background 1.2 Key Players Involved The entities involved in power system planning in Ontario include the Ministry of Energy (Ministry), 1.1 What Is Electricity Power the Independent Electricity System Operator System Planning? (IESO), the Ontario Energy Board (OEB), Ontario Electricity power system planning involves man- Power Generation (OPG), Hydro One, a major aging the long-term demand for electricity and transmitter and distributor (see Section 3.06 of deciding how to meet that demand through vari- this year’s Annual Report for our audit of Hydro ous generation, conservation and transmission One’s Management of Electricity Transmission solutions: and Distribution Assets), four other small licenced Generation—Ontario has a diverse mix of transmitters and approximately 70 local distribu- Chapter 3 • VFM Section 3.05 • energy sources (called the “supply mix”) tion companies. Figure 1 shows the key roles and including nuclear, hydropower, natural gas, responsibilities of each. wind, solar and bioenergy. The Ministry and the IESO are the key players in • Conservation—Ontario encourages consum- power system planning at the provincial level. Their ers to reduce or shift consumption away from plans aim to ensure adequate supply, bulk transmis- peak times and to use energy more efficiently, sion planning and interaction with local distribu- with the intent to avoid the need for increased tion companies. Under the Electricity Act, 1998, the electricity generation and to avoid or defer the Minister has the authority to issue directives (which need for significant investment in new electri- require cabinet approval) on the supply mix, and city infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • GARDINER EXPRESSWAY and LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD EAST RECONFIGURATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Natural Environment Baseline Conditions Report – 2014
    GARDINER EXPRESSWAY AND LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD EAST RECONFIGURATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Natural Environment Baseline Conditions Report – 2014 Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Blvd East Reconfiguration Environmental Assessment Natural Environment Baseline Conditions Report 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The study area has been heavily urbanized with industrial and port activities dating back to the 1800s. As a result, the natural environment has been severely degraded. Currently there is little existing natural habitat or wildlife that is native to the study area. The study area does provide some habitat for breeding and migrant bird species as well as some breeding and foraging habitat for some herpetofauna and mammals. Species that are tolerant of habitat disturbances and human activity can be found in the study area as documented in a number of background studies completed along Toronto’s central waterfront. All flora and fauna have been found to be common in Ontario. An MNR biologist has been contacted (2010) and relays that no aquatic species at risk have been reported within the vicinity of the study area. Recent activities that have taken place along the Lake Ontario shoreline, particularly those led by Waterfront Toronto, the City of Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) have considered environmental concerns to be a key priority. As a result, there has been a gradual improvement in physical shoreline conditions, fish habitat, adjacent natural communities, and water quality in Lake Ontario and the Don River. Examples of these improvements include Corktown Common, which is a new park in the West Don Lands, and Lake Ontario Park in the Port Lands.
    [Show full text]