DOCSLIB.ORG

Stomatal Density Values of Cycad Species Grown Under Elevated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stomatal Density Values of Cycad Species Grown Under Elevated 10.1071/BT11009_AC CSIRO 2011 Australian Journal of Botany, 2011, 59(7), 630–639 Supplementary Data Table 1: Stomatal density values of cycad species grown under elevated [CO2] of 1500ppm and sub-ambient [O2] of 13% in combination and isolation relative to control of 380ppm [CO2] and 20.9% [O2]. Atmospheric Treatment Species Control st dev Low O2 st dev High CO2 st dev Low O2 / High CO2 st dev Cycas revoluta Stomatal Density (mm2) 51.9 12.9 53.7 12.1 54.2 2.4 40.7 2.9 Cv 24.9 22.6 4.4 7.1 Change Relative to Control (%) - 103.6 104.5 78.6 Dioon merolae Stomatal Density (mm2) 66.2 9.5 69.0 5.8 62.0 7.1 80.1 17.3 Cv 14.3 8.4 11.5 21.5 Change Relative to Control (%) - 104.2 93.7 121.0 Lepidozamia hopei Stomatal Density (mm2) 31.0 2.9 32.4 5.8 31.5 0.8 36.1 7.7 Cv 9.3 17.8 2.5 21.4 Change Relative to Control (%) - 104.5 101.5 116.4 Lepidozamia peroffskyana Stomatal Density (mm2) 33.3 4.2 39.4 5.6 35.6 3.5 36.6 7.6 Cv 12.5 14.3 9.8 20.9 Change Relative to Control (%) - 118.1 106.9 109.7 Macrozamia miquelii Stomatal Density (mm2) 62.5 2.4 50.9 7.0 53.2 10.4 55.6 4.2 Cv 3.8 13.7 19.6 7.5 Change Relative to Control (%) - 81.5 85.2 88.9 Zamia floridiana Stomatal Density (mm2) 72.7 8.5 74.5 18.7 61.1 1.4 70.4 14.7 Cv 11.7 25.0 2.3 20.9 Change Relative to Control (%) - 102.5 84.1 96.8 1 Supplementary Data Table 2: Stomatal index values of cycad species grown under elevated [CO2] of 1500ppm and sub-ambient [O2] of 13% in combination and isolation relative to control of 380ppm [CO2] and 20.9% [O2]. Atmospheric Treatment Species Control st dev Low O2 st dev High CO2 st dev Low O2 / High CO2 st dev Cycas revoluta Stomatal Index (%) 4.7 0.5 4.8 0.4 4.4 0.3 4.2 0.1 Cv 11.2 9.1 7.1 2.7 Change Relative to Control (%) - 102.4 94.8 90.2 Dioon merolae Stomatal Index (%) 6.8 0.7 6.5 0.4 5.8 0.6 6.6 0.9 Cv 9.6 6.3 10.5 13.4 Change Relative to Control (%) - 96.2 85.1 97.6 Lepidozamia hopei Stomatal Index (%) 4.6 0.1 4.3 0.5 4.3 0.5 4.3 0.5 Cv 1.6 11.0 10.8 10.9 Change Relative to Control (%) - 92.4 92.0 92.2 Lepidozamia peroffskyana Stomatal Index (%) 4.6 0.7 4.8 0.3 4.2 0.4 4.2 0.4 Cv 15.1 7.2 8.6 8.3 Change Relative to Control (%) - 104.0 92.3 92.4 Macrozamia miquelii Stomatal Index (%) 8.1 0.1 6.8 0.5 7.3 1.3 7.4 0.7 Cv 1.6 7.2 18.2 10.0 Change Relative to Control (%) - 84.6 90.1 91.3 Zamia floridiana Stomatal Index (%) 6.7 0.4 6.4 0.7 6.3 0.2 6.9 0.3 Cv 5.9 10.4 3.9 4.0 Change Relative to Control (%) - 96.0 94.4 103.1 2 Supplementary Data Table 3: Stomatal Pore Lengths of cycad species grown under elevated [CO2] of 1500ppm and sub-ambient [O2] of 13% in combination and isolation relative to control of 380ppm [CO2] and 20.9% [O2]. Atmospheric Treatment Species Control st dev Low O2 st dev High CO2 st dev Low O2 / High CO2 st dev Cycas revoluta Stomatal Pore Length ( m) 31.8 9.4 23.9 5.2 25.9 5.9 26.3 4.5 Cv 29.7 21.8 22.6 17.3 Change Relative to Control (%) - 75.1 81.5 82.7 Dioon merolae Stomatal Pore Length ( m) 17.5 4.7 22.3 4.6 22.9 4.5 24.4 5.1 Cv 26.7 20.5 19.8 20.7 Change Relative to Control (%) - 127.9 131.4 139.8 Lepidozamia hopei Stomatal Pore Length ( m) 41.2 8.4 38.0 8.3 46.7 5.2 43.6 5.5 Cv 20.5 21.8 11.2 12.7 Change Relative to Control (%) - 92.1 113.4 105.8 Lepidozamia peroffskyana Stomatal Pore Length ( m) 35.6 5.5 39.8 4.0 42.9 5.7 39.3 5.9 Cv 15.5 10.1 13.3 15.1 Change Relative to Control (%) - 111.7 120.4 110.3 Macrozamia miquelii Stomatal Pore Length ( m) 28.6 3.3 26.4 3.8 31.5 6.7 29.8 5.0 Cv 11.7 14.5 21.2 16.8 Change Relative to Control (%) - 92.1 110.2 104.3 Zamia floridiana Stomatal Pore Length ( m) 21.5 5.4 19.4 3.7 17.2 3.1 18.0 2.7 Cv 25.2 18.8 17.8 15.1 Change Relative to Control (%) - 90.3 79.8 83.7 3 Supplementary Data Table 4: Calculated maximum stomatal conductance (Gsmax) of cycad species (see Supplementary Data Formulae 1) grown under elevated [CO2] of 1500ppm and sub-ambient [O2] of 13% in combination and isolation relative to control of 380ppm [CO2] and 20.9% [O2]. Atmospheric Treatment Species Control st dev Low O2 st dev High CO2 st dev Low O2 / High CO2 st dev -2 -1 Cycas revoluta Gsmax (mmol m s ) 112.1 27.9 74.2 16.8 85.2 3.8 65.6 4.7 Cv 24.9 22.6 4.4 7.1 Change Relative to Control (%) - 66.2 76.0 58.5 -2 -1 Dioon merolae Gsmax (mmol m s ) 59.6 8.5 92.4 7.7 86.8 10.0 123.5 26.6 Cv 14.3 8.4 11.5 21.5 Change Relative to Control (%) - 154.9 145.5 207.1 -2 -1 Lepidozamia hopei Gsmax (mmol m s ) 89.0 8.3 82.1 14.6 109.1 2.8 112.8 24.2 Cv 9.3 17.8 2.5 21.4 Change Relative to Control (%) - 92.2 122.6 126.7 -2 -1 Lepidozamia peroffskyana Gsmax (mmol m s ) 77.2 9.7 108.0 15.4 109.6 10.7 98.5 20.6 Cv 12.5 14.3 9.8 20.9 Change Relative to Control (%) - 139.9 142.0 127.6 -2 -1 Macrozamia miquelii Gsmax (mmol m s ) 108.8 4.2 77.7 10.7 107.8 21.1 103.2 7.7 Cv 3.8 13.7 19.6 7.5 Change Relative to Control (%) - 71.4 99.1 94.9 -2 -1 Zamia floridiana Gsmax (mmol m s ) 97.8 11.4 85.4 21.4 57.4 1.3 71.4 14.9 Cv 11.7 25.0 2.3 20.9 Change Relative to Control (%) - 87.3 58.7 73.0 4 Supplementary Data Graph 1: Stomatal density and size of cycad species relative to other plant groups grown under ambient atmospheric [CO2] and [O2]. Stomatal size calculated as stomatal length x width of closed guard cells. Data taken from Franks and Beerling (2009). 1000 900 800 ) Franks and Beerling 2009 2 700 Cycas revoluta 600 Dioon merolae 500 Lepidozamia hopei 400 Lepidozamia peroffskyana Macrozamia miquelii 300 Stomatal Density (mm Stomatal Zamia integrifolia 200 100 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Stomatal Size ( m2) Franks PJ, Beerling DJ. 2009. Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 10343-10347 5 Supplementary Data Graph 2: Calculated maximum stomatal conductance (Gsmax) (see supplementary data for additional information) of cycad species grown sub-ambient [O2] of 13.0 % and elevated [CO2] of 1500 ppm (see Table 2 for growth conditions): a) Cycas revoluta; b) Dioon merolae; c) Lepidozamia hopei; d) Lepidozamia peroffskyana; e) Macrozamia miquelii, and; f) Zamia integrifolia. Letters indicates significant difference in treatment SPL to control SPL value (a = P > 0.05; b = P < 0.05; c = P < 0.01). Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean. 6 Supplementary Data Graph 3: Maximum stomatal conductance (Gsmax) of cycad species grown under elevated [CO2] and sub-ambient [O2]. Cycas revoluta (closed squares); Dioon merolae (open squares); Lepidozamia hopei (closed triangles); Lepidozamia peroffskyana (open triangles); Macrozamia miquelii (closed diamonds); Zamia integrifolia (open diamonds). Error bars indicate stomatal deviation either side of mean. 7 Supplementary Data Formulae 1: Maximum stomatal conductance formulae of Cowan (1977) use in Figure 3. -2 -1 Gsmax = maximum stomatal conductance of water vapour (mol m s ) S = stomatal density (number of stomata per m2) D = diffusivity of water in air (m-2 s-1) A = area of the stomatal pore (m2) V = molar volume of air (m3 mol-1) L = depth of stomatal pore (m) Area of the stomatal pore was calculated as an ellipse as cycad species analysed possess large kidney shaped stomata. Following the methods of Beerling and Chaloner (1993) stomatal width at full opening was assumed to be half stomatal pore length.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Release Notice This Document Is Available Through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Controlled Document System Teambinder™
    Pre-Clearance Survey Report Mainline (Dawson Highway Crossing – Mainline Valve 4) Project Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: x Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action x Should indicates a recommended course of action x May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Pipelines. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Pipelines Environmental Manager. Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Australia Pacific LNG, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between Australia Pacific LNG and AMEC Environment and Infrastructure Pty Ltd. Australia Pacific LNG and AMEC Environment and Infrastructure Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Copying this report without the permission of Australia Pacific LNG or AMEC Environment and Infrastructure Pty Ltd is not permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Biology of Cycad Pollen, Seed and Tissue - a Plant Conservation Perspective
    Bot. Rev. (2018) 84:295–314 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-018-9203-z Comparative Biology of Cycad Pollen, Seed and Tissue - A Plant Conservation Perspective J. Nadarajan1,2 & E. E. Benson 3 & P. Xaba 4 & K. Harding3 & A. Lindstrom5 & J. Donaldson4 & C. E. Seal1 & D. Kamoga6 & E. M. G. Agoo7 & N. Li 8 & E. King9 & H. W. Pritchard1,10 1 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex RH17 6TN, UK; e-mail: [email protected] 2 The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd, Private Bag 11600, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; e-mail [email protected] 3 Damar Research Scientists, Damar, Cuparmuir, Fife KY15 5RJ, UK; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 4 South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 5 Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical Garden, Chonburi 20250, Thailand; e-mail: [email protected] 6 Joint Ethnobotanical Research Advocacy, P.O.Box 27901, Kampala, Uganda; e-mail: [email protected] 7 De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines; e-mail: [email protected] 8 Fairy Lake Botanic Garden, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; e-mail: [email protected] 9 UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK; e-mail: [email protected] 10 Author for Correspondence; e-mail: [email protected] Published online: 5 July 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Cycads are the most endangered of plant groups based on IUCN Red List assessments; all are in Appendix I or II of CITES, about 40% are within biodiversity ‘hotspots,’ and the call for action to improve their protection is long- standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Brisbane Native Plants by Suburb
    INDEX - BRISBANE SUBURBS SPECIES LIST Acacia Ridge. ...........15 Chelmer ...................14 Hamilton. .................10 Mayne. .................25 Pullenvale............... 22 Toowong ....................46 Albion .......................25 Chermside West .11 Hawthorne................. 7 McDowall. ..............6 Torwood .....................47 Alderley ....................45 Clayfield ..................14 Heathwood.... 34. Meeandah.............. 2 Queensport ............32 Trinder Park ...............32 Algester.................... 15 Coopers Plains........32 Hemmant. .................32 Merthyr .................7 Annerley ...................32 Coorparoo ................3 Hendra. .................10 Middle Park .........19 Rainworth. ..............47 Underwood. ................41 Anstead ....................17 Corinda. ..................14 Herston ....................5 Milton ...................46 Ransome. ................32 Upper Brookfield .......23 Archerfield ...............32 Highgate Hill. ........43 Mitchelton ...........45 Red Hill.................... 43 Upper Mt gravatt. .......15 Ascot. .......................36 Darra .......................33 Hill End ..................45 Moggill. .................20 Richlands ................34 Ashgrove. ................26 Deagon ....................2 Holland Park........... 3 Moorooka. ............32 River Hills................ 19 Virginia ........................31 Aspley ......................31 Doboy ......................2 Morningside. .........3 Robertson ................42 Auchenflower
    [Show full text]
  • Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description
    Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site Ecological Character Description 2010 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this ECD are correct, the Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of the Environment does not guarantee and accepts no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to the currency, accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the information in this ECD. Note: There may be differences in the type of information contained in this ECD publication, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2010. The ‘Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site: Final Report’ is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This report should be attributed as ‘BMT WBM. (2010). Ecological Character Description of the Shoalwater and Corio Bays Area Ramsar Site. Prepared for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.’ The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Ecological Character Description for the Shoalwater and
    [Show full text]
  • A Trait-Based Approach to the Conservation of Threatened Plant Species
    A trait-based approach to the conservation of threatened plant species J UAN C. ÁLVAREZ-YÉPIZ,ALBERTO B ÚRQUEZ A NGELINA M ARTÍNEZ-YRÍZAR and M ARTIN D OVCIAK Abstract Traditionally the vulnerability of threatened environment, genetics and population dynamics (Gilpin & species to extinction has been assessed by studying their Soulé, ), hereafter referred to as the traditional ap- environment, genetics and population dynamics. A proach. In this context, the study of environment includes more comprehensive understanding of the factors pro- investigating the quality and quantity of available and po- moting or limiting the long-term persistence of threa- tential habitat, and thus all aspects of species’ relationships tened species could be achieved by conducting an with abiotic and biotic factors. Genetic studies focus on the analysis of their functional responses to changing envir- genetic diversity of species and populations (including onments, their ecological interactions, and their role in adaptation to change) and population bottlenecks from ecosystem functioning. These less traditional research small effective population sizes. Research on population dy- areas can be unified in a trait-based approach, a recent namics investigates species’ demography and persistence in methodological advance in ecology that is being used to a given environment manifested via population structure, link individual-level functions to species, community fecundity and, ultimately, fitness. The traditional approach and ecosystem processes to provide mechanistic explana- has proved successful in studies of threatened and non- tions of observed patterns, particularly in changing environ- threatened plant and animal species (e.g. Oostermeijer ments. We illustrate how trait-based information can be et al., ; Conard, ; Kalkvik, ).
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Perspectives in Australian Archaeology, Part X
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Asmussen, Brit, 2011. Changing perspectives in Australian archaeology, part X. "There is likewise a nut…" a comparative ethnobotany of Aboriginal processing methods and consumption of Australian Bowenia, Cycas, Macrozamia and Lepidozamia species. Technical Reports of the Australian Museum, Online 23(10): 147–163. doi:10.3853/j.1835-4211.23.2011.1575 ISSN 1835-4211 (online) Published online by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://publications.australianmuseum.net.au 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia Changing Perspectives in Australian Archaeology edited by Jim Specht and Robin Torrence photo by carl bento · 2009 Papers in Honour of Val Attenbrow Technical Reports of the Australian Museum, Online 23 (2011) ISSN 1835-4211 Changing Perspectives in Australian Archaeology edited by Jim Specht and Robin Torrence Specht & Torrence Preface ........................................................................ 1 I White Regional archaeology in Australia ............................... 3 II Sullivan, Hughes & Barham Abydos Plains—equivocal archaeology ........................ 7 III Irish Hidden in plain view ................................................ 31 IV Douglass & Holdaway Quantifying cortex proportions ................................ 45 V Frankel & Stern Stone artefact production and use ............................. 59 VI Hiscock Point production at Jimede 2 .................................... 73 VII
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Pollination of Cycads 9 10 Alicia Toon1, L
    1 2 DR. ALICIA TOON (Orcid ID : 0000-0002-1517-2601) 3 4 5 Article type : Invited Review 6 7 8 Insect pollination of cycads 9 10 Alicia Toon1, L. Irene Terry2, William Tang3, Gimme H. Walter1, and Lyn G. Cook1 11 12 1The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, 13 Australia 2 14 University of Utah, School of Biological Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA 15 3 USDA APHIS PPQ South Florida, P.O.Box 660520, Miami, FL 33266, USA 16 17 Corresponding author: Alicia Toon 18 [email protected] Ph: +61 (0) 411954179 19 Goddard Building, The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, 20 Qld, 4072, Australia. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Manuscript Author 31 This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/AEC.12925 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved 32 33 Acknowledgements 34 We would like to thank Dean Brookes for discussions about genetic structure in cycad 35 pollinating thrips populations. Also, thanks to Mike Crisp for discussions about plant 36 diversification and Paul Forster for information on Australian cycads. This work was funded 37 by ARC Discovery Grant DP160102806. 38 39 Abstract 40 Most cycads have intimate associations with their insect pollinators that parallel those of 41 well-known flowering plants, such as sexually-deceptive orchids and the male wasps and 42 bees they deceive.
    [Show full text]
  • Self Guided Walk 1 31 700M - 20 Minutes Duration 30 Wheel Chair Accessible
    32 Self Guided Walk 1 31 700m - 20 minutes duration 30 Wheel Chair accessible 29 Welcome to Mackay 28 Macrozamia miquelii female cone Zingiber spectabile – Palm Walk (16) Xerochrysum bracteatum – Golden Everlasting Daisies (23) Regional Botanic Various cycads and native Continue along the macrozamias grow in between. Gardens where you will Lagoons pathway to the The fenced area on your right discover some of the Gymnosperm Deck (15) protects Macrozamia miquelii which is endemic to Australia. The deck is a great opportunity plants that are part of to try your hand at some bird our living collection. 27 spotting on the lagoons with some assistance from the bird identification sign. How many can you find from the sign? 26 Cordyline manners-suttoniae - Giant Palm Lily 23 Commersonia bartramia 24 – Brown Kurrajongs in flower Gardens Administration The large trees above are (21) Commersonia bartramia – On your right are the giant 25 Brown Kurrajongs. They are Cordyline manners-suttoniae 22 a fast-growing tree and their (Giant Palm Lily) which are found Bowenia spectablis - Cycad (15) branches are layered with white only in Queensland and have 20 flowers in December. Turn left at attractive white flowers and bright At the end of the timber deck the intersection onto... red fruits. The hedges along here are popular with many butterfly 15 21 keep walking until you reach Palm Walk (16) species, including the Ulysses 19 a zigzag pathway which leads and Green Triangle. Can you spot you up through a range of cycad Here you will find a variety of any butterflies along here? species.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are There So Many Flowering Plants? a Multiscale Analysis of Plant Diversification
    vol. 195, no. 6 the american naturalist june 2020 Why Are There So Many Flowering Plants? A Multiscale Analysis of Plant Diversification Tania Hernández-Hernández1,2 and John J. Wiens1,* 1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721; 2. Catedrática CONACYT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología) asignada a LANGEBIO-UGA (Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad–Unidad de Genómica Avanzada) Cinvestav, Libramiento Norte Carretera León Km 9.6, 36821 Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico Submitted February 3, 2019; Accepted November 25, 2019; Electronically published April 3, 2020 Online enhancements: appendixes A–R. Dryad data: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.5tb2rbp10. abstract: The causes of the rapid diversification and extraordi- cies distributed among 10 major clades (phyla sensu Niklas nary richness of flowering plants (angiosperms) relative to other 2016). The differences in richness among these clades are plant clades is a long-standing mystery. Angiosperms are only one striking (fig. 1), with ∼90% of described land plant species be- among 10 major land plant clades (phyla) but include ∼90% of land longing to angiosperms (flowering plants; Magnoliophyta). plant species. However, most studies that have tried to identify which Given that angiosperms also appear to be relatively young, traits might explain the remarkable diversification of angiosperms they clearly have a high overall diversification rate (speciation have focused only on richness patterns within angiosperms and tested minus extinction; Morlon 2014). The challenge is to identify only one or a few traits at a single hierarchical scale. Here, we assem- fi ble a database of 31 diverse traits among 678 families and analyze which traits might help explain this accelerated diversi ca- relationships between traits and diversification rates across all land tion, including traits related to ecology, morphology, phys- plants at three hierarchical levels (phylum, order, and family) using iology, reproduction, and genomic characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interaction Between Diet Breadth, Geography and Gene Flow in Herbivorous Insects
    The interaction between diet breadth, geography and gene flow in herbivorous insects Dean Robert Brookes Bachelor of Environmental Sciences (Hons) The University of Queensland A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2017 School of Biological Sciences Abstract The geographical distribution and life history of insects and their host plants determines when, and if, they will interact. The vast majority of herbivorous insects are host-plant specialists and their narrow host range limits their distribution and may also restrict gene flow between their populations. Generalist insect herbivores, by contrast, might be expected to have much higher gene flow across populations because the distribution of multiple host plant species is likely to be much more contiguous. Species distributions shift continually, so with enough time the populations of a specialist insect species should experience more events that fracture their distribution because of the changing distribution of their relatively fewer hosts. The changing distribution of insects and their host plants is thus important for mediating host-plant interactions and will also influence how and when adaptation to a host plant, or subset of host plants, occurs. To investigate the influence of geography and host breadth on gene flow, and thus speciation, I explore the evolutionary history and population genetic structure of two herbivorous insects with different host plant relationships, the generalist bug Nezara viridula (Pentatomidae, Hemiptera), a global pest species, and the specialist thrips Cycadothrips chadwicki (Aeolothripidae, Thysanoptera), the pollinator in a brood-site mutualism with Macrozamia cycads. The results from these systems were then integrated with other similar data sets from phytophagous insects to understand better how gene flow and host specificity relate to one another, and to examine the role each has played (and may still play) in the evolution of insect-plant interactions more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycads and Their Associated Species in Queensland Travel Scholarship Report
    Cycads and their associated species in Queensland Travel Scholarship Report The author with Lepidozamia hopei at Cape Tribulation, Queensland Felix Merklinger Diploma Course 45 July 2009 1 Preface The second year of the three-year diploma course at Kew offers the opportunity to apply for a travel scholarship. This is the chance for a student to study a chosen plant or group of plants in their natural habitat. Since working in the Palm House at Kew as a member of staff, I have developed a passion for the order Cycadales. Kew has an extensive collection of cycads; mainly the South African Encephalartos, which are well represented in the living collections of the Palm and Temperate House. I am especially interested in the genus Cycas and their insect pollinators, and am planning to study this relationship intensively throughout my future career. Australia was chosen as the destination for my first trip to look at cycads in the wild. This continent has some of the most ancient relicts of flora and fauna to be found anywhere in the world. Australia is home of all three families within the Cycadales and also has a number of weevils involved in their pollination. This, therefore, is the perfect country to be starting my studies. Additionally, the Australian species of cycads at Kew are not as well represented as the African species – the Australian cycads can be notoriously difficult to grow in cultivation and, of course, the import and export regulations from and into Australia are rather tight. 2 This trip provided a great opportunity to study the native flora of a country, combining this chance with a passion for insect-plant interactions, accumulating knowledge and experience for a possible future career and gathering horticultural understanding of an ancient group of plants which is in need of long-term conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Burnett Mary, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]