Elizabeth City Historic District
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Ordinance
CITY COUNCIL ATLANTA, GEORGIA 20-O-1381 AN ORDINANCE BY TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE TO AMEND PART III, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, PART 15 LAND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, PART 16 ZONING AND PART 19, FEES, PERMITS, LICENSES AND CHARGES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTA CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ALIGN ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES TRANSFERRING FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION AND OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS TO THE ATLANTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; TO UPDATE CERTAIN PROVISIONS; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the City commissioned a comprehensive study entitled “Delivering Mobility, An Assessment of a Stand-Alone Atlanta Transportation Department” (the “Study”), which was prepared by the consulting group WSP USA and completed March 5, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Study found that restructuring the way transportation is managed in the City could catalyze, and be the vehicle for, providing transportation leadership, vision, talent and capacity; and WHEREAS, the City adopted certain Study recommendations to create the Atlanta Department of Transportation via Ordinance 19-O-1159, adopted by the Atlanta City Council on June 17, 2019 and approved by the Mayor on June 24, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Atlanta Department of Transportation (“ATLDOT”) will have purview over transportation related functions within the City of Atlanta, including certain functions previously under the purview of the Department of Public Works Office of Transportation and Office of Capital Projects; and WHEREAS, ATLDOT desires to amend the City of Atlanta Code of Ordinances so as to align roles and responsibilities transferring from the Department of Public Works Office of Transportation and Office of Capital Projects to the Atlanta Department of Transportation. -
REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Contents Executive Summary
REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Contents Executive Summary ................................................................5 Summary of Resources ...........................................................6 Regionally Important Resources Map ................................12 Introduction ...........................................................................13 Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value .................21 Areas of Historic and Cultural Value ..................................48 Areas of Scenic and Agricultural Value ..............................79 Appendix Cover Photo: Sope Creek Ruins - Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area/ Credit: ARC Tables Table 1: Regionally Important Resources Value Matrix ..19 Table 2: Regionally Important Resources Vulnerability Matrix ......................................................................................20 Table 3: Guidance for Appropriate Development Practices for Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value ...........46 Table 4: General Policies and Protection Measures for Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value ................47 Table 5: National Register of Historic Places Districts Listed by County ....................................................................54 Table 6: National Register of Historic Places Individually Listed by County ....................................................................57 Table 7: Guidance for Appropriate Development Practices for Areas of Historic and Cultural Value ............................77 Table 8: General Policies -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Old West Baltimore Historic District other names Harlem Park/Upton/Sandtown/Druid Heights/Madison Park (B-1373) 2. Location street & number Roughly bounded by North Ave., Madison Ave., Dolphin St., Franklin St., • not for publication Fulton Ave. city or town Baltimore • vicinity state Maryland Code MD county Independent City code 510 zip code 21217 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this S nomination Q request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [3 meets • does not meet the National Register criteria. -
Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5
Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5 - Eastside Extending Atlanta’s Urban Redevelopment Potential Prepared for The City of Atlanta Fulton County and The Atlanta Board of Education by Eastside Atlanta Stakeholders and Huntley & Associates November 2003 Extending Atlanta’s Urban Redevelopment Potential Eastside Atlanta Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District #5 Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 12 The Vision 12 Description of the Proposed TAD / Geographic Boundaries (A) 13 Overview of Tax Allocation Districts 13 Tax Increment Financing Spurs Redevelopment 14 Summary of Atlanta TADs 15 Why Eastside Atlanta Qualifies for TAD 18 Key Findings within the Redevelopment Area 20 Rationale for the Proposed Eastside Redevelopment Area and TAD 20 2000 Census Tracts within the Proposed Eastside TAD 20 Market Conditions and Trends (B) 21 Proposed Land Uses and Redevelopment Projects (C) 28 The Vision 28 Strategy and Goals 28 Proposed Private Redevelopment Projects (D) 29 Public Improvements and Additional Economic Catalysts 37 Contractual Relationships (E) 43 Relocation Plans (F) 44 Zoning & Land Use Compatibility (G) 45 Method of Financing / Proposed Public Investments (H) 45 Taxable Valuation for TAD (I) 47 Historic Property within Boundaries of TAD (J) 47 Creation & Termination Dates for TAD (K) 48 Tax Allocation Increment Base & State Certification (M) 48 NOTE: Section and subsection headings listed below that are followed by a (n) denote information specifically required per Georgia Code Chapter -
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Old West Baltimore Historic District other names Harlem Park/Upton/Sandtown/Druid Heights/Madison Park (B-1373) 2. Location street & number Roughly bounded by North Ave., Madison Ave., Dolphin St., Franklin St., LJ not for publication Fulton Ave.____________________________________ city or town Baltimore D vicinity state Maryland Code MD county Independent City code 510 zip code 21217 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this [3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ^ meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. -
Property Type Emerged in Georgia and Gained Popularity Among Developers and a Burgeoning Middle-Class Population
NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 124-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section E Page 1 Georgia’s Modern Apartment Complexes Summary This section provides contexts outlining the development of Georgia’s modern apartment complexes. Documenting the significant activities associated with these types of properties, the narrative briefly discusses the early history of Georgia’s apartment development, followed by an examination of modern apartment complexes within the state’s broader historic periods of development. A research tool designed to serve also as a predictive model to assist in the locating and identification of historic-period apartment complexes, this section provides the necessary historical contexts for the listing of Georgia’s modern apartment complexes in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Introduction According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the term, apartment, is derived from English origins, first used in London about 1640 and adopted into general usage in Britain and the American colonies in the 1750s. Connoting buildings and tenants “housed apart” in large measure because of patterns of social segmentation, the apartment became a small, but increasingly important component of the American urban and then suburban landscape. In the last several decades, architectural historians have defined and redefined American apartment buildings and apartment complexes within a number of historical periods and contexts. -
Chelseahagood a Valuation of Historic District
A Valuation of Historic District Designation in Atlanta Chelsea Hagood MCRP 2014 Georgia Institute of Technology 1 Acknowledgements: I want to express deep gratitude to my adviser, Dr. Nisha Botchwey, for guiding and supporting me through this entire process. I would also like to thank Allison Duncan for sharing her knowledge and ideas on preservation in Atlanta. Special thanks go to Atlanta realtors, Anna Kilinski and Derrick Duckworth, for providing data that made this project possible. Finally, I want to thank my parents for their unending support and encouraging words throughout my education and career. 2 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Policy Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 Literature Review…………………………………………………………………………………………………………13 Data and Methodology….………………………………………………………………………………………………22 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………30 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………36 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...……41 References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...……45 Appendix………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...……49 3 Introduction: It is a well-established notion that historic district designation results in increased property values (Rypkema, 2005). Many cities have employed these historic preservation policies in an effort to catalyze inner-city redevelopment efforts. It is difficult, however, to assume that all geographies will ascribe the same monetary value to historic preservation, especially across -
Heritage Area Management Action Plan
BALTIMORE CITY HERITAGE AREA MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN PREPARED FOR THE BALTIMORE CITY COMMISSION FOR HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL PRESERVATION AND THE CITIZENS OF BALTIMORE SEPTEMBER 2001 BALTIMORE CITY HERITAGE AREA MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN Prepared for the: Citizens of Baltimore and for the City of Baltimore Commission for Historical and Architectural Preservation 417 E. Fayette Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Prepared By: HRG Consultants, Inc. 7921-B Glenbrook Road Bethesda, Maryland 20814 And AB Associates Margaret R. Burke, Ph.D. Lipman, Frizzell, Mitchell LLC Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP Urban Asset Management September 2001 MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN i CREDITS THANKS FOR ASSISTANCE IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN GO TO: The Honorable Martin P. O’Malley, Mayor The Honorable Laurie Schwartz, Deputy Mayor THE BALTIMORE CITY HERITAGE AREA STEERING COMMITTEE James Piper Bond, Chair Camay Murphy, Chair The Honorable Ben Cardin, U.S. Representative The Honorable Paul Sarbanes, U.S. Senator The Honorable Verna Jones, Maryland House of Delegates The Honorable Sheila Dixon, City Council President Michael Baker, Baltimore Department of Recreation and Parks; Jay Brodie, Baltimore Development Corporation; Connie Caplan, Mt. Vernon Cultural District; Ed Cline, Maryland Stadium Authority; Robert Embry, Abell Foundation; Louis Fields, Baltimore African American Tourism Council; Dennis Fiori, Maryland Historical Society; Bill Gilmore, Baltimore Office of Promotion; Charles Graves, Baltimore Department of Planning; Nancy Haragan, Greater -
The Value of Historic District Status in Georgia
MARCH 22, 2019 The Value of Historic District Status in Georgia Carlianne Patrick Working Paper 19-02 cslf.gsu.edu Title ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am especially appreciative of the assistance from Sarah Rogers, Certified Local Government Coordinator for the Historic Preservation Division of the Department of Natural Resources, for providing guidance and original documentation on many of the local historic districts; Allison Duncan, principal planner for the Atlanta Regional Commission, who provided the data on listed and potential National Register of Historic Places districts; and Stephanie Cherry-Farmer, program coordinator for the National Register Program and Survey for the Historic Preservation Division of the Georgia Department of National Resources, who provided invaluable assistance gathering the initial data for the project. This research would not have been possible without their assistance. I also would like to thank Siyu Pan for her excellent research assistance. cslf.gsu.edu The Value of Historic District Status in Georgia The Center for State and Local Finance WORKING PAPER 19-02 The Value of Historic District Status in Georgia CARLIANNE PATRICK March 2019 Note: This paper was previously published by CSLF as a policy report in January 2019. The Center for State and Local Finance Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Georgia State University Atlanta, Georgia 30303 United States of America Phone: (404) 413-0137 Fax: (404) 413-0248 Email: [email protected] Website: cslf.gsu.edu Copyright 2019, the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the copyright owner. -
ABSTRACT Title of Document: “MIXED USE” in PEABODY HEIGHTS
ABSTRACT Title of Document: “MIXED USE” IN PEABODY HEIGHTS: USING ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES TO RESURRECT A BALTIMORE NEIGHBORHOOD Daniel FC Hayes, AIA, Master of Historic Preservation, 2017 Directed By: Dennis Pogue, PhD Graduate Program in Historic Preservation School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation University of Maryland, College Park Once strong, vibrant, primarily-residential neighborhoods, often interspersed with institutional, commercial, and industrial functions, many inner-city areas have been negatively transformed since WWII though substantive loss of urban fabric and change-of-use. These factors have had detrimental effects on the communities, including vacancy, reduction in the mix of uses and population, and the loss of property values and high-quality buildings, contributing to a depression in neighborhood morale, economics, and æsthetics. This is not an uncommon situation in urban communities throughout the nation. The PEABODY HEIGHTS section of Baltimore, Maryland, is an apt example of these urban conditions. This paper investigates these conditions and proposes recommendations for their amelioration that grow out of the area’s original development principles. “MIXED USE” IN PEABODY HEIGHTS: USING ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES TO RESURRECT A BALTIMORE NEIGHBORHOOD . By Daniel FC Hayes, AIA Final Project submitted to the Faculty of the Historic Preservation Program of the School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements