CORRUPTION RISKS: MINING APPROVALS in AUSTRALIA Mining for Sustainable Development Programme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CORRUPTION RISKS: MINING APPROVALS in AUSTRALIA Mining for Sustainable Development Programme CORRUPTION RISKS: MINING APPROVALS IN AUSTRALIA Mining for Sustainable Development Programme OCTOBER 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 07 26 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY QUEENSLAND Description of activity - p7 Mining Leases Queensland - p26 Summary of risk assessment Coordinated projects - p29 outcomes - p8 11 37 NATIVE TITLE INTRODUCTION Determination of native title - p37 Transparency International Mining for Sustainable Development Programme The expedited process – exploration - p11 licences, Western Australia - p38 The M4SD Programme study - p11 Right to negotiate and ILUAs, Mining Glossary - p12 Leases – Western Australia - p38 Acronyms and abbreviations - p13 Background - p14 46 Methodology - p15 CROSS CUTTING ISSUES Industry influence - p46 16 Whistle blowing - p50 WESTERN AUSTRALIA Due Diligence - p50 Exploration Licence and Mining Lease Approvals Process Western Australia - p16 State Agreements Western Australia - p22 2 54 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Distribution of results - p54 Risks distributed across approvals processes - p56 Large mining infrastructure projects - p56 Native Title - p57 Aggregated risks - p57 Other minor risks - p57 Limitations of results - p57 58 CONCLUSION 60 BIBLIOGRAPHY 68 APPENDIX A 3 FOREWORD For the past 15 years, I have been working in corporate Without adequate due diligence—even basic research into accountability, good governance, and business and human the track record of mining applicants—there is a risk that rights. This has included the mining sector, with a focus permits will be awarded to companies with a history of non- on the policy and practice of Australian mining companies compliance or corruption, including in their operations in operating abroad – often in corruption and conflict-prone other countries. countries. The risk assessment also identified a high potential for Understanding corruption risks in the mining approvals industry influence and state and policy capture in the process is vital to ensuring mining contributes to sustainable awarding of mining approvals. Greater regulation of political development, and shared benefits. donations, lobbyists and the movement of staff between government and industry, would help reduce risks that could If corruption risks are identified, and acted upon, before enable corruption to occur. mining activities get underway, better outcomes for impacted communities, the natural environment and all citizens, can be While Australia has systems of transparency and achieved. accountability in place, more needs to be done to address transparency of negotiation processes and agreements, This important research, Corruption Risks: Mining Approvals including native title parties. in Australia, documents the existing system of checks and balances that require transparency and accountability in the This report is an essential resource for government, exploration license, and mining lease, approvals regime in industry, civil society, and the public – those with an interest Australia. in ensuring mining contributes to economic, social, and environmental prosperity. The report identifies vulnerabilities in both the Western Australia and Queensland approvals process that could It shines a light on the corruption vulnerabilities in the mining enable corruption to occur. approvals process, and provides a roadmap for better policy and practice. Corruption risks are not just a developing country paradigm. This research confirms even mature mining jurisdictions, such as Australia, have vulnerabilities in the mining approvals process that could result in corruption and compromised decision-making. A key risk identified for large scale mining and coordinated projects (associated infrastructure), is inadequate due diligence investigation into the character and integrity of applicants for mining approvals. This includes a lack of investigation of beneficial ownership. Chief Executive Officer Transparency International Australia 4 ABOUT THIS REPORT This Report Disclaimer Transparency International’s Mining for Sustainable The research, language, views, conclusions and Development Programme (M4SD) seeks to enhance strategies outlined in this document have been created transparency and accountability in the awarding of by the Transparency International National Chapter mining-related permits, licences and contracts. in Australia and are not [necessarily] endorsed by Transparency International, Transparency International This report documents findings of research into the Australia or BHP Billiton Foundation. mining approvals process in Australia. The material set out in this publication is intended for general information only. To the extent permitted by Acknowledgements local laws, Transparency International, Transparency International Australia and BHP Billiton Foundation exclude liability for and are not liable to any person The BHP Billiton Foundation supports the participation with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the of Transparency International Australia in Phase I of the information set out in the publication. M4SD Programme. Globally, the M4SD Programme is also funded by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Get in contact The Australian M4SD research was undertaken by Helen Langley on behalf of Transparency International For enquiries regarding the Australian research into Australia. Helen Langley is the author of this report. mining approvlas or other Transparnecy International Layout and design by Leapfrog International. Australia programmes please contact: [email protected] A summary report was prepared by Tim Grice on behalf of Transparency International Australia. The summary +61 3 9877 0369 report is available at www.transparency.org.au www.transparency.org.au Title Picture: Panorama of Coober Pedy, South Australia. Source: By edella/Shutterstock Report Information: Title: Corruption Risks: Mining Approvals in Australia Publication date: October 2017 ISBN: 0 9752439 1 8 5 Helen Langley Author 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Description of activity The Australian research for the Transparency International Mining for Sustainable Development Programme investigated mining approvals in Western Australia and Queensland using the Mining Awards Corruption Risk Assessment (MACRA) risk assessment tool. In Western Australia, the research focussed on the investigation of exploration licences, mining leases, State Agreement Acts and Native Title mining agreements (expedited process and right to negotiate); and in Queensland, it focussed on mining leases and environmental approvals for large infrastructure mines under State and Commonwealth law. The research involved an investigation into the context of mining in Australia and the process for approving the grant of mining leases or licences and associated approvals required before mining activities can commence. The purpose of the research was to note where there are risks that could enable corruption to occur. Vulnerabilities identified in the mining approvals process led to a comprehensive analysis and assessment of risk. A number of risks ranging from low, through medium, high to very high risks were identified that could create an enabling environment for corruption to occur. Geologists Sampling Rocks in the Pilbara, Australia Source: By Adwo/Shutterstock. 7 Summary of risk assessment 4. The inadequate protection of whistle blowers was assessed as a weakness in the broader outcomes State and Commonwealth regulatory framework for mining approvals. The research identified that comprehensive law reform is required to facilitate disclosure and protect whistle blowers in the mining The risk assessment identified seven industry. risks for mining approvals in Western 5. Large mining infrastructure project approvals Australia and Queensland, and two risks in each state were assessed as having lower for Native Title mining agreement making. levels of transparency and accountability than The analysis showed risks that were mining lease approvals. The research revealed that distributed across approvals processes, Ministers or senior government representatives and that the aggregation of risks can be have considerable discretionary powers to make approvals and recommendations. This raises a compounding factor and lead to an considerable concern as when there is also increase in the potential for corruption to a risk of industry influence, and opportunities occur. for companies and their directors with a poor business record to operate in each state the risk of 1. The research found that the approvals systems corruption is significantly increased. for exploration licences and mining leases in Western Australia, and for mining leases in 6. The approvals process for large infrastructure Queensland, have a high level of transparency projects evaluated and approved through the and accountability that can act as a corruption Coordinated projects process in Queensland was deterrent for many of the vulnerabilities identified in assessed as having elements of transparency and the approval processes. Ministerial discretion was accountability for the assessment and evaluation identified as a weakness in the exploration licences of Environmental Impact Statements for State and and mining lease approval process in Western Federal environmental approvals. Yet, the level of Australia, which led to the assessment of the risk, discretion available to the Coordinator-General, and external influence in the awarding of approvals. the limited independent reviewing of the scientific The risk was assessed as a low level risk as the modelling
Recommended publications
  • Inquiry Into Greenfields Mineral Exploration and Project Development in Victoria
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Inquiry into greenfields mineral exploration and project development in Victoria May 2012 ORDERED TO BE PRINTED Victorian Government Printer Parliamentary Paper No. 136 Session 2010–11 Parliament of Victoria Economic Development and Infrastructure Committee Inquiry into greenfields mineral exploration and project development in Victoria ISBN: 978‐0‐9808214‐2‐0 Economic Development and Infrastructure Committee Parliament House, Spring Street EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Phone: +61 3 8682 2832 Email: [email protected] Website: <http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/edic> This report is also available online at the Committee’s website. Cover design by Matt Clare of Mono Design. Rear cover image provided by Iluka Resources. This report is printed on recycled paper. Table of Contents Committee members and staff ix The Economic Development and Infrastructure Committee xi Committee contact details xi Terms of reference xiii Chair’s foreword xv List of recommendations xvii List of tables xxi List of figures xxiii List of abbreviations xxv Chapter one: Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of the Inquiry 3 1.1.1 Terms of reference 3 1.1.2 What types of minerals are the focus of the Inquiry? 4 1.2 Inquiry process 5 1.3 Report overview 5 Chapter two: The mining and extractives sectors in Australia 7 2.1 Overview of mineral exploration and mining project development 8 2.1.1 ‘Greenfields’ versus ‘brownfields’ exploration 9 2.1.2 Why is greenfields mineral exploration important? 9 2.1.3 The relationship between junior
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report (2020)
    For personal use only TERRACOM LIMITED 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Contents SECTION 1: COMPANY OVERVIEW 2 Chairman’s letter to shareholders 3 Directors 4 Management team 6 Company information 7 Current operations and project structure 8 Operations overview 9 Current mining tenements held 10 SECTION 2: COMPANY UPDATE 11 Operational summary 12 Production overview 13 Financial overview 14 Operational performance 15 SECTION 3: COMPANY OPERATIONS AND PROJECTS 16 Australia Operations and Projects 17 South Africa Operations and Projects 22 SECTION 4: JORC RESOURCES AND RESERVES STATEMENT 31 SECTION 5: FINANCIAL REPORT 39 Director’s Report 41 Auditors Independence Declaration 64 Statement of profit or loss 66 Statement of other comprehensive income 67 Statement of financial position 68 Corporate Directory Statement of changes in equity 70 Statement of cash flows 72 PEOPLE Notes to financial statements 77 Directors Wallace King AO Directors declaration 133 Craig Ransley Glen Lewis Independent Auditor’s Report 134 Shane Kyriakou SECTION 6: ASX ADDITIONAL SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION 141 Craig Lyons Matthew Hunter Additional shareholder information for listed public companies 142 Company Secretary Megan Etcell Chief Executive Officer Danny McCarthy Chief Commercial Officer Nathan Boom Download Chief Financial Officer Celeste van Tonder Scan the QR code to download CORPORATE INFORMATION a PDF of the 2020 TerraCom Registered Office Blair Athol Mine Access Road Limited Annual Report. Clermont, Queensland, 4721 Australia Telephone: +61 7 4983 2038 Contact Address
    [Show full text]
  • Roy Hill Celebrates Historic First Shipment
    10 December 2015 Roy Hill Celebrates Historic First Shipment Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd and Roy Hill Holdings Pty Ltd are pleased to announce the historic inaugural shipment from Port Hedland of low phosphorous iron ore from the Roy Hill mine on the MV ANANGEL EXPLORER bound for POSCO’s steel mills in South Korea. Mrs Gina Rinehart, Chairman of Hancock and Roy Hill Holdings Pty Ltd, said “The Roy Hill mega project is the culmination of hard-work from the dedicated small executive and technical teams at Hancock and more recently by the entire Roy Hill team.” “Given that the mega Roy Hill Project was a largely greenfield project that carried with it significant risks and considerable cost, it is remarkable that a relatively small company such as Hancock Prospecting has been able to take on and complete a project of this sheer size and complexity.” “The Roy Hill Project has recorded many achievements already and with the first shipment it will also hold one of the fastest construction start-ups of any major greenfield resource project in Australia. This is a considerable achievement, and although the media refer to a contractors date for shipment, it remains that the shipment still occurred ahead of what the partners schedule had planned in the detailed bankable feasibility study.” “The performance on the construction gives great confidence we can achieve performance as a player of international significance in the iron ore industry. To put the scale of the Roy Hill iron ore project into perspective in regard to Australia’s economy, when the mine is operating at its full capacity, Roy Hill will generate export revenue significantly greater than either Australia's lamb and mutton export industry or our annual wine exports.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Responsibility for Australia's Mining Legacies
    GROUND TRUTHS: TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR AUSTRALIA’S MINING LEGACIES Charles Roche and Simon Judd ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Research: Charles Roche, Simon Judd and Sangita Bista We recognise and pay tribute to the communities, researchers and mining professionals who have long understood the need for mining legacies reform in Australia. This project was sponsored by a grant from the Australian Conservation Foundation. Editors: Charles Roche and Simon Judd Design and layout: Elbo Graphics All images (c) MPI unless attributed Cover artwork: Trying to Protect Our Land, Jacky Green Prints available, monies raised will support community response to mining at McArthur River. ISBN: 978-0-9946216-0-3 A publication by the Mineral Policy Institute www.mpi.org.au | [email protected] GROUND TRUTHS: TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR AUSTRALIA’S MINING LEGACIES 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Recommendations 4 Mining In Australia 5 Mine Closure Or Mining Legacy? 6 Success or failure? Mine closures in Australia 6 Mining legacies 7 The Australian response to mining legacies 7 International recognition and response 9 Risk 11 Environmental and social risk 11 Financial Risk 12 Textbox 1. Yabulu Refnery 14 Examples Of Mining Legacies In Australia 15 New South Wales coal – case studies 15 Textbox 2. Financial risk at Russell Vale 18 Victorian coal – case studies 19 Textbox 3. A lack of closure planning at Anglesea 21 The Carmichael coal mine; project viability and closure risk 23 McArthur River Mine 23 Ranger Uranium Mine 24 Textbox 4. Burning rocks and technical risk at McArthur River 26 Regulation and Management of Mine Closure and Mining Legacies 28 Coordinated action on Australian mine closure 28 The state system and environmental fnancial assurance 28 The bonds system 29 Mining levies 29 New South Wales 29 Textbox 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) Centralized Monitoring Solution
    Case Study: Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) Centralized Monitoring Solution of 2007, seven mines all linked by the world’s largest privately owned rail network. CHALLENGES To meet the growing demand for their iron ore, particularly from the ever-growing Chinese market, Pilbara Iron were faced with the challenge of increasing production from their mining operations, or more importantly preventing stoppages in production, while maintaining quality. It was recognized that the process control systems at their processing plants were critical assets required to be available and reliable while keeping the plant within the optimal production limits. At the same time the mining industry, like most industries, was and is facing a worldwide shortage of skilled labor to operate and maintain their plants. Rio Tinto Iron Ore Figure 1. Pilbara Iron’s operations has the added burden of very remote mining operations, making it even harder to attract and retain experienced and skilled labor, PROFILE particularly control and process engineers. The mining operations of Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) in Australia are located in the Pilbara Region, In order to offer the benefits of living in a a remote outback area in northwest Western modern thriving city, a group of process control Australia, some 1200 kilometers from Perth. Pilbara professionals was established in Perth. Iron has three export port facilities and, by the end The members of this team came from Rio Tinto A WEB-BASED SOLUTION Asset Utilization, a corporate support group To meet this need a centralized monitoring solution established within Rio Tinto at the time to address was established, with data collection performed at performance improvement across all operations the sites and analysis and diagnosis undertaken worldwide, and Pilbara Iron itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Application by Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd and Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd
    AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL Applications by Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd and Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd [2013] ACompT 2 Citation: Applications by Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd and Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd [2013] ACompT 2 Review from: Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia Parties: Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd, North Mining Ltd, Pilbara Iron Pty Ltd, Rio Tinto Ltd, Mitsui Iron Ore Development Pty Ltd, Nippon Steel Australia Pty Ltd & Sumitomo Metal Australia Pty Ltd Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd, Hamersley Iron-Yandi Pty Ltd, Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd, North Mining Ltd, Pilbara Iron Pty Ltd, Rio Tinto Ltd, Mitsui Iron Ore Development Pty Ltd, Nippon Steel Australia Pty Ltd & Sumitomo Metal Australia Pty Ltd File numbers: ACT 3 of 2008 ACT 4 of 2008 Tribunal: MANSFIELD J (PRESIDENT) MR R SHOGREN (MEMBER) MR R STEINWALL (MEMBER) Date of judgment: 8 February 2013 Catchwords: ACCESS TO SERVICES – review of Minister’s decisions to declare two services under s 44H of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – where Minister had failed to consider proper test in applying criterion (b) in s 44H(4) – private profitability test – whether there was material which could satisfy the Tribunal about criterion (b) properly considered ACCESS TO SERVICES – review of Minister’s decisions to declare two services under s 44H of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – review being conducted after significant passage of time – extent of power of presiding member under s 44K(6) – whether in circumstances presiding member could request National Competition Council to secure experts
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Players in Global Mining Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
    Extractive Industries and Development48882 Series #5 June 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Emerging Players in Global Mining Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Dr. David Humphreys The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 USA www.worldbank.org/ogmc (OR /oil OR /gas OR /mining) Public Disclosure Authorized www.ifc.org/ogmc (OR /oil OR /gas OR /mining) World Bank Group’s Oil, Gas, and Mining Policy Division Oil, Gas, Mining, and Chemicals Department A joint service of the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation The Oil, Gas, and Mining Policy Division series publishes reviews and analyses of sector experience from around the world as well as new findings from analytical work. It places particular emphasis on how the experience and knowledge gained relates to developing country policy makers, communities affected by extractive industries, extractive industry enterprises, and civil society organizations. We hope to see this series inform a wide range of interested parties on the opportunities as well as the risks presented by the sector. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank or its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. Extractive Industries
    [Show full text]
  • TMEC-Annual-Report-201617.Pdf
    TMEC | Annual Report 2016/17 CONTENTS President’s Report Connecting Tasmanian Manufacturers – Ray Mostogl .....................................................5 to the World .......................................................20 CEO’s Report Portal Profile: – Wayne Bould....................................................6 Currawong Engineering Pty Ltd .................21 Energy Report Combined Experience – Ray Mostogl .....................................................7 Delivers Product Improvements ................22 Occupational Health and Safety Report METS Ignited Encourages – Peter Walker .....................................................8 Collaboration ....................................................23 Land Management Report Ensuring Mining Sector Innovation ..........24 – Cassie Arnold ...................................................9 Industry Challenged to Take a Advanced Manufacturing Report New Look at ‘Safety’ ......................................25 – Kelly Elphinstone .................................. 10 - 11 Diversity and Inclusion: Environment Report Good for Business ............................................26 – Mark Wright ....................................................11 2016-17 Financials .................................. 27 - 32 Emergency Response Report – Ben Maynard .......................................... 12 - 13 Board of Directors ................................... 33 - 36 Simulated Work Environment Opens its List of Members ........................................ 37 - 38 Doors to
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources Tasmania Annual Review 2007/2008
    Mineral Resources Tasmania Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources A Division of the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Mineral Resources Tasmania Annual Review 2007/2008 Mineral Resources Tasmania PO Box 56 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 Phone: (03) 6233 8377 l Fax: (03) 6233 8338 Email: [email protected] l Internet: www.mrt.tas.gov.au 2 Mineral Resources Tasmania Mineral Resources Tasmania (MRT) is a Division of the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources (DIER). It is Tasmania’s corporate entity for geoscientific data, information and knowledge, and consists of a multi-tasking group of people with a wide range of specialist experience. The role of MRT is to ensure that Tasmania’s mineral resources and infrastructure development are managed in a sustainable way now, and for future generations, in accordance with present Government Policy, Partnership Agreements and goals of Tasmania Together. — Mission — ! To contribute to the economic development of Tasmania by providing the necessary geoscientific information and services to foster mineral resource and infrastructure development and responsible land management for the benefit of the Tasmanian community — Objectives — ! Benefit the Tasmanian community by an effective and co-ordinated government approach to mineral resources, infrastructure development and land management. ! Maximise the opportunities for community growth by providing timely and relevant geoscientific information for integration with other government systems. ! Optimise the operational
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE PLACE REPORT Greater Bendigo City 
    HERITAGE PLACE REPORT Greater Bendigo City HERITAGE CITATION REPORT Name Carlisle United / Garden Gully Heritage Heritage Overlay Precinct Address Casley, Bennett, Duncan, Louis, Victoria Streets Property No: Building Type VHR Number N/A Residential buildings private, former church, HI Number N/A special uses land, reserved former mine lands Heritage Status Recommended listing of File Number N/A Carlisle United / Garden Gully Heritage Precinct as an individual item within the heritage overlay Precinct Recommended significant and Hermes Number contributory places within the Precinct Heritage Study Author Year Grading Ironbark Heritage Study Mandy Jean 2010 Local significance Designer/Architect Architectural Style unknown Vernacular to Modern 1950s Bungalows Maker/Builder unknown Date 1870s to 1950s Type of Place Hermes Number Heritage Place Report %#S HERITAGE PLACE REPORT Greater Bendigo City History and Historical Context History of the Area Bendigo gold field commenced in 1851 and continued over the next 153 years through times of boom, decline, revival and stagnation. The last underground historic mine closed in 1954 with continued production locally. The Bendigo Goldfields is Australia's second largest in terms of historical production after Western Australia's Golden Mile (Boulder, Kalgoorlie).1 It produced the largest amount of gold of any field in Eastern Australia and retains the largest evidence of its mining past within the inner city area. The history of mining shaped and created Bendigo. It left a chaotic industrial landscape which was in a state of perpetual flux with seemingly random, scattered, small and often very isolated settlements of people across a wide area.2 The Bendigo goldfields, about 12 kilometres wide, extend 30 kilometres from north to south.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilbara Iron Ore Project: Blacksmith Subterranean Fauna Surveys
    Flinders Mines Ltd Pilbara Iron Ore Project: Blacksmith Subterranean Fauna Surveys Final Report Prepared for Flinders Mines Ltd by Bennelongia Pty Ltd December 2011 Report 2011/137 Bennelongia Pty Ltd Pilbara Iron Ore Project, Blacksmith Subterranean Fauna Surveys Pilbara Iron Ore Project: Blacksmith Subterranean Fauna Surveys Bennelongia Pty Ltd 5 Bishop Street Jolimont WA 6913 www.bennelongia.com.au ACN 124 110 167 December 2011 Report 2011/137 i Bennelongia Pty Ltd Pilbara Iron Ore Project, Blacksmith Subterranean Fauna Surveys Cover photo : Delta deposit in the Blacksmith tenement, Hamersley Range LIMITATION: This report has been prepared for use by the Client and its agents. Bennelongia accepts no liability or responsibility in respect of any use or reliance on the report by any third party. Bennelongia has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of all information supplied by the Client. COPYRIGHT: The document has been prepared to the requirements of the Client. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belong to Bennelongia and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Bennelongia. Client – Flinders Mines Ltd Report Version Prepared by Checked by Submitted to Client Method Date Draft report Vers. 1 Sue Osborne and Stuart Halse email 14.xi.2011 Michael Curran Final report Vers. 2 Sue Osborne Stuart Halse Email 14.xii.2012 K:\Projects\B_FLI_01\report\revised impact areas\report\BEC_Flinders_subfauna_Vers.2_14xii11_FINAL.docx ii Bennelongia Pty Ltd Pilbara Iron Ore Project, Blacksmith Subterranean Fauna Surveys EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Flinders Mines Limited is considering the mining of up to six iron ore deposits within the Blacksmith tenement (E47/882), approximately 60 km north-northwest of the central Pilbara town of Tom Price.
    [Show full text]
  • West Pilbara Iron Ore Project (WPIOP) the Largest Independent
    West Pilbara Iron Ore Project (WPIOP) Project Overview and Highlights The largest independent undeveloped direct shipping iron ore project in Australia WPIOP Location Map Project Develop a competitive and profitable iron ore Vision export operation. The project is backed by two of the top five steelmakers globally, Baosteel and POSCO, Owners together with AMCI, an international resources investment and trading house, and Aurizon, a major Australian logistics company. Underpinned by ~8,000km2 tenement holding in Geology & the Western Pilbara with total Mineral Resources of ~2.7Bt of predominantly Channel Iron Deposit Resources (CID) type iron ore with current Stage 1 Mineral Resources of ~1.5Bt. Initial production target of 40Mtpa for >20 years Production of mine life with significant upside from Stage 2 deposits. Simple low cost open pit mining using excavators Mining and trucks. Conventional, predominantly dry crush and Processing screen processing at a Central Process Facility (CPF) to produce a blended fines product. New ~240km heavy haul railway to transport Rail product from the CPF to port with each train carrying over 30,000 tonnes. New multi-user deep water port at Anketell Point Port capable of handling large Cape sized (250kt) vessels, expandable to 350Mtpa of exports. West Pilbara Blend (WPB) CID fines product with a target 58.0% Fe product grade. Extensive Market sinter test work undertaken by Asian steelmakers. Feasibility study completed on 40Mtpa Stage 1 Project development. Subsequent project optimisation Status & work
    [Show full text]