IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Hanan S. Rashada Case No.: 09-- 1 15.9L POB 14211 Cleveland, OH 44114 Judges: (216) 704-9399
Relator, ORIGINAL ACTION
vs.
The Ohio Secretary of State Borden Building 180 East Broad Street Columbus, OH 43215-3707 (877) 767-6446
Respondent.
Please also serve:
Ohio Attorney General 30 East Broad Street, 17th Floor Columbus, OH 43215-3428 (877) 244-6446
U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20535-0000 (800) 869-4499
The United States Congress The Clerk of the House United States Capitol Building, Room H154 Washington, D.C. 20515-6601 (202) 225-7000
COMPLAINT FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
Hanan S. Rashada POB 14211 Cleveland, OH 44114 (216) 704-9399 (fi PRO SE LITIGANT CI,F'Rtt ,r1F C'UUR7" SUI^f^E MUH10 TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......
STATEMENT OF FACTS ...... 1
ARGUMENT ...... 24
CONCLUSION ...... 29
FOOTNOTES ...... 33
PROOF OF SERVICE ......
APPENDIX Appx. Page
Appendix A ...... 1 Appendix B ...... 4 Appendix C ...... 6 Appendix D ...... 9 Appendix E ...... 10 Appendix F ...... 11 Appendix G ...... 14 Appendix H ...... 16
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION ...... 1
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS; STATUTES ......
USA Patriot Act of 2001, Section 223(2)(f) ...... 1 Ohio Constitution, Section 2, Article IV ...... 1 S.Ct.Prac.R. X, §§ 1-4 ...... 1
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
CAS ES : ......
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS; STATUTES : ...... 1
USA Patriot Act of 2001, Section 223(2)(f) ...... 1 Ohio Constitution, Section 2, Article IV ...... 1
i STATEMENT OF FACTS
Hanan S. Rashada, the only relator in this action, pursuant to Article IV, Section 2 of the
Ohio Constitution and S.Ct.Prac.R. X§§ 1-4, governing original actions, asks this Court to issue a writ of prohibition preventing the State (and other offices of government and civilians acting with it), (hereinafter collectively referred to as "relator") from inducing mind control espionage, engaging sexual assault, battery, harassment, and stealing hard files and computer generated documents from both her home computer and she uses at public libraries; and from bullying her by wielding electronic surveillance, intelligence technologies and other instrumentation, from implanting devices into her and conducting medical procedures and surgeries without her awareness, permission and consent.
1. Back gr ound. The relator was being assaulted and harassed since the time she lived in Washington, D.C. during the 1980s. This was long before the horrific events of
September 11, 2001 and the enactment of the USA Patriot Act. It was after September 11, 2001 and the enactment of the USA Patriot Act that assaults on her worsened. Commencing in early
1996 through 2009 (in Cleveland, Ohio alone), the relator submitted numerous complaints to several offices of government concerning assault and harassment. A list of those offices of govemment is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Appendix A. At the time of the signing of this motion, however, no responses were forthcoming from any of those offices concerning her complaints. An Affidavit in Support is attached. All footnotes are listed on page 33 of this Complaint.
Respondent has no probable cause for assaulting and harassing the relator and is clearly acting against her for reasons unrelated to a watch for terrorist activities. Therefore, pursuant to
Section 223(2)(f) of the USA Patriot Act, as stated immediately below, respondent is in default: "Administrative Discipline. If a court or appropriate department or agency determines that the United States or any of its departments or agencies has violated any provision of this chapter and the court or appropriate department or agency finds that the circumstances surrounding the violation raise serious questions about whether or not an officer or employee of the United Sates acted willfully or intentionally with respect to the violation, the department or agency shall, upon receipt of a true and correct copy of the decision and findings of the court or appropriate department or agency promptly initiate a proceeding to determine whether disciplinary action against the officer or employee is warranted. If the head of the department or agency involved determines that disciplinary action is not warranted, he or she shall notify the Inspector General with jurisdiction over the department or agency concerned and shall provide the Inspector General with the reasons for such determination."
2. Mind Control Espionage.
a. Parallel. During early 1999, relator began drafting a small business plan for a company she named Parallel. This business would provide a service for analyzing research and discovery on a metaphysical curve. In the spring of 2005, relator sent a proposal outline of her new business concept to respondent via of "Signature Mail". The package however failed to reach respondent's office because respondent, having learned of the proposal while censoring her, intercepted it. In fact, respondent was very much in the way of intercepting relator's mails and other materials for several years.
Complaints that the relator submitted to offices of government often included her new business technique for compiling theories about what was happening to her. During the time relator was submitting her complaints, she was not yet fully aware that it was Respondent that was already monitoring her via intelligence technologies. She believed the parties who assaulted and harassed her were civilians recruited for terrorist watch programs. Nevertheless, when her proposal outline failed to reach respondent's office that cinched it. Relator then realized that more than civilians were involved as they would be hard put to walk into a post office and take possession of State office mails. Frustrated by all this, relator put away her work
2 on Parallel. The respondent, however, having realized the commercial potential of relator's new business technique, moved in for the kill. As far as it was concerned, if it could not take possession of relator's new business, it would take possession of the mind that could produce the business by using electronic surveillance, MICs, and intelligence technologies. Before it could fully take possession of the relator, however, respondent needed to complete the operations it already had in effect.
The USA Patriot Act designated the total amount of SIX HUNDRED MILLION AND
NO/100 DOLLARS ($600,000,000.00) for the FBI technical support center. Relator believes the mainframe technology that catalogs and monitors her brainwave activity is located inside this center and that PC (personal computers) or PT (personal technology) can be mobilized anywhere to download from it or input information to it concerning the relator.
b. New Age Curriculum. Commencing in 1998 and continuing until early 2002, the relator drafted several study courses (approx. 22) that she encapsulated into the heading, New
Age Curriculum. Relator anticipated the courses would be taught on-line until an actual university campus was built. In March 2002, when she left Cleveland to visit Atlanta, Georgia, she deposited the preliminary New Age Curriculum in a locked suitcase in the basement of a relative's home. Six months later when she returned to Cleveland, she discovered the New Age
Curriculum had been stolen. When she went to report the theft to the Cleveland Police
Department (5th District), the officer who assisted her, spoke sincerely in telling her that he understood she had mental problems and that her report would not be considered competent. It was at this point that relator started becoming fully aware that false accusations concerning her mental health were circulating in very important places although she was not yet aware of where they originated.
3 3. MKUltra Instrumentation. Research indicates that MKUltra was first discovered
(by happenstance) during the 1950's. Other research indicates that this instrumentation has been around since as far back as the 10th century and that it might have been renamed.l Nevertheless, during the 1950's, scientists did research on MKUltra and found it to be harmful to the brain in causing tumors; muscular skeletal dysfunction, viral syndrome and other disorders. Relator believes this instrumentation was used on her and that it has caused some damages to her that respondent's physicians deny and have failed to report to her.
4. Invisibility Camouflaize. During World War II (summer 1943), an experiment named "Project Invisibility" (also referred to Project Rainbow and the Philadelphia Experiment) was conducted on a Navy destroyer, the U.S.S. Eldridge, while docked at a Philadelphia Naval
Yard. The purpose of the experiment was to research Einstein's Unified Field Theory for
Gravitation and Electricity. Scientists sought to make the ship invisible to enemy radar? It was
Einstein's theory that invisibility could be achieved by generating an intense magnetic field that would cause refraction (bending of light or radar waves) around the ship. In line with Einstein's theory, scientists mounted the U.S.S. Eldridge with tons of electronic equipment that included two massive generators, three RF transmitters, three thousand power amplifier tubes, special synchronizing and modulation circuits and other specialized hardware. The research was a success. The only drawback was that the experiment not only succeeded in camouflaging the ship; it teleported the ship from the Navy yard at Philadelphia to Norfolk, Virginia, where it stayed for several minutes, before teleporting back to the yard at Philadelphia. In the process of researching invisibility, scientists had discovered dematerialization and teleportation. This research was continued throughout the years. While it was initially aimed at electronic camouflage, it was later extended to the study of creating invisibility by using a similar field in
4 the air instead of water. Today, massive microwave centers are used to effectuate invisibility, dematerialization, and teleportation.
During relator's stay (2002 to 2006) at a property of the Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing
Authority (CMHA), specifically, The Riverview Tower Apartments ("the Riverview") at 1795
West 25th Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, and the place where the worst of the onslaught of sexual assaults, batter, and turmoil began. In conducting investigative research into her dilemma, relator sought to learn how respondent, whom she could detect only via of a glimmer of something flickering about her residence, were able to enter into her apartment to assault her and whatever else. Eventually, she learned that a microwave center was located on top of a building located in Downtown Cleveland and referred to as the 740 Huron Road Building; the old address of a telephone company. Although separated by the Cuyahoga River, bridges and other obstructions, this building faces the back of the Riverview, where the relator's apartment was situated. Relator believes this microwave center, or something like it, might also be the point where government operatives are teleported into her present residence as well and somehow connected with the strange meter she located inside her present apartment. When relator discovered the meter, she noticed that some kind of energy emanated from it that made her nauseous. She found this suspicious and decided to cover it over with a sniall plastic cup filled with aluminum foil to block the energy rays. During her stay at the Riverview, relator never found a meter of this kind inside her apartment. She believes however that a meter of its kind could have been located elsewhere on the premises of the Riverview.
5. Remote Viewine, (RV); Teleportation. Remote Viewing was introduced in 1974.
It is technology that is used to gather information about a distant or unseen target using extra- sensory perception. The task of remote viewers is to gather information about a person or object
5 hidden from physical view or separated by distance. While remote viewing is described as such, there is no extra-sensory (or telepathy) involved. "Telepathy" is the transfer of information between individuals by extra-sensory means. Relator believes remote viewing is different in that it involves the process of teleporting the ethereal body of a viewer into the location of the person or thing, so the viewer can align his tethered ethereal body with that of the viewee for the purpose of absorbing information from the viewee's mind and body. The popularity of remote viewing followed on the heels of the declassification of a muti-million dollar research project conducted in the 1990s. The purpose of the project was to determine whether remote viewing could be useful to military intelligence. The project was criticized for leaking information to participants by inadvertently leaving clues; but, the experiments took a negative turn when clues were eliminated. While the research project determined remote viewing had some positive qualities, it found no evidence that it could be useful to military intelligence and was terminated in 1995. Relator asserts here her diagnosis that remote viewing can be (for lack of better terms) particles thought infected. Put another way, articles of the viewer's own thought processes, influence the results of his viewing thereby causing the viewer to walk away from a viewing with a product infected with particles of his own thoughts. A viewing that involves simplistic thoughts that does not involved higher thinking may go uninfected (e.g., ...going shopping;
...don't feel well; ...going see doctor; or number sequences: ...9-3-9-9, ...4-1-4-2, etc. ); but, the vastness of a person's thinking cannot effectively be corralled and in cases where the viewer is unable to discern creative thoughts from channeling thoughts or random thoughts passing through or analytical thoughts can be potentially disastrous.3 Nevertheless, relator believes this technology was used mainly to enable respondent to enter into her home to align their tethered bodies with hers or the purpose of sexually assaulting and harass her and to steal her personal
6 files. Said operatives were detected by the electrical pulsating they generated. The kind of electrical pulsating that could not be frequently used on someone without it affecting his health in some negative manner. Relator respectfully moves this Court to consider this in assessing damages. The use of these technologies on American citizens is a vile form of exploitation.
People should be able to use the bathroom, shower, flatulate, copulate (just to name a few) without an audience snooping around. Even slaves had the privacy needed to evacuate their bodily functions. This is slavery. A new kind of slavery where minority factions are slavers working with ruling class factions to bring harm to other minorities for the simply reason they do not share their views. This technology does not uphold the Constitutional rights of the American citizen, but obstructs them.
6. Microchip Implants (MIC). Relator believes that microchips were implanted inside her head and possibly the walls of her chest that enable respondent to monitor her brain activity with the use of "repeater stations". Relator believes that the IC medications she was prescribed, along with mysterious injections she has been given over the past few years, are connected with MIC implants and possibly other medical procedures she received without her knowledge and consent at the hands of respondent who took access to her via of a teleprocess.
Microchips or other implants enable respondent to monitor the relator and subject her to verbal assaults of various kinds, including an admonishment to "Help your own people". No explicit definition was given as to what was meant by". . . your own people" (e.g., species, subspecies, gender, age group, economic class, school of thought [?]. Relator believes however that this was intended as a racial slur and that despite some minority involvement, this confliction is largely based in race, economic and ruling class bias. Everywhere the relator ventures, she is followed, and there seems always an undercurrent of tension: If she walks into a
7 store, or a library, or down the street, or up the street, she can sense an undercurrent of some energy form unrelated to her reason for being there. If the relator is inside her home or outside of it, there is a peculiar tension that follows, generated by unseen operative forces. Relator has a home computer that has a Media Player that only plays music. Yet, there are movie files downloaded onto her computer that relator cannot access and is therefore unable to discern their content. Relator believes that were the issuing party(ies) able to resolve their personal hang-ups with themselves that they masquerade as someone else, this would be helpful in resolving this confliction.
Other verbal assaults were transmitted to the relator [apparently] for the purpose of trying to accomplish a fright factor and intimate the relator, such as: "You're gonna get killed" and "I wanted youfor myself'.
7. Censorship. Relator reasserts that she has been censored since as early as the
1980's and that those who are censoring her could not have suspected her of terrorist activities.
Relator believes that the respondent and its assigns have been censoring her since the Reagan
Administration when she lived in Washington, D.C. and possibly earlier. She believes this censorship has been in operation for years leading up to the Bush Administration and that at least some of the factions involved have been around for the duration. Relator believes that to maintain their posture for this length of time, respondent somehow sequestered the cooperation of officials in high places. Nonetheless, having censored the relator for so many years, respondent knew her to be fairly intelligent, analytical, and perceptive and that this was its primary reason for censoring her.
a. Watch Groups. Relator does not believe that a terrorist watch group
(inferred via of offhanded innuendo) was actually appointed to censor her under the pretext of a
8 terrorist watch and the USA Patriot Act. Relator believes a group was appointed to torture her with sexual assault, battery, sleep deprivation and other methods and that the group consists of
mostly male operatives (ruling class and minorities) and females who assault her (what one
might call a slight of hand precaution) under the watchful eyes of those naive enough to believe
their mission is a terrorist watch. This watch group is an artifice used by those who must cover
their backs in the event they are questioned by their superiors concerning their whereabouts in
connection with relator's complaints. Relator also believes there is some female religious group
participation in all this. Religious female operatives who thump holy books on their Sabbath day
and spy on her on their days off; all in the name of God and the USA Patriot Act.
b. Media Participation. Relator asserts that media personnel have participated
in respondent's behalf in taking access to her home computer under the pretext of a terrorist
watch and the USA Patriot Act. More specifically, on the morning of April 20, 2009, relator
left her residence for approx. 40 minutes. On the way back to her residence, a presentiment blew
across her bringing to mind the meter she found in her apartment. Ref Invisibility Camouflage.
As soon as she arrived at her apartment, she went to check on the meter and found that the small
plastic cup she had placed over it was still intact, but its eluniinum filling had been removed and
aid on the shelf beside it. Relator is the sole lessee of her apartment dwelling and could think of
no reason why anyone would have need to enter her apartment to adjust the meter unless they
had been able to remotely detect that it had been compromised. Relator believes that the
operatives that were affected by this compromise had alternately elected to drive to her residence
and that this accounted for the group of late model, Lincoln Town cars she saw parked in the lot
of the Travelodge Hotel (11837 Edgewater Avenue, Lakewood, Ohio) on her way home. The
Travelodge Hotel is located directly behind relator's residence (11820 Lake Avenue, Lakewood,
9 Ohio) 4 Relator believes these vehicles are used by high profile media personnel, in particular, the broadcasting company of Channel 19, their representatives and assigns and possibly others working with them. Relator further believes that the operatives of said vehicles drove into
Lakewood to access local technology that would enable them to access her apartment; and if the past is any reference, that technology is located somewhere inside the residence of a tenant(s) that reside in her apartment building.
On other occasions, between May 24th and May 30, 2009, relator witnessed the same motor vehicles in the parking lot at the Travelodge Hotel. hiasmuch as relator would not be able to access the driver records of said vehicles, she is herewith submitting the following list:
a. T 494023C - New York Plate b. T 494022C - New York Plate c. T 521480C - New York Plate d. T 494895C - New York Plate e. EPZ 4096 - New York Plate f. EMM 9945 - Ohio Plate g. DZD 6484 - Ohio Plate
There was some hearsay about the media getting involved for benevolent reasons; that it was trying to help. Various aspects of the media have been tracking this situation for years.
Relator has struggled for years to bring this case to justice. The media could easily have brought this story to the attention of the world, but has avoided it for reasons relator is confident are politically self-serving.
The Plain Dealer (a local newspaper) has also participated in watching the relator before the enactment of the USA Patriot Act and as far back as 1999 when she was employed at a law firm in Downtown Cleveland.
8. Medical Health.
10 Relator has visited several medical facilities over the past several years and believes that whenever she appears, the medical personnel employed at the facility is replaced by
a specially appointed medical staff to attend to her and that her (actual) medical records are
always sealed.
a. Fairview Hospital. In September 2007, the relator was watching television
in her hotel room at the Knights Inn hotel (at that time, the Days Inn hotel) when something very
sharp was jabbed into the left side of her back. The relator took alka-seltzer for the pain and
tried to relax. When the pain failed to go away, she approached the Emergency Room at
Fairview Hospital. She was admitted and remained there for two days while numerous tests
were made of her. She was released with a clean bill of health. Although the relator felt fine,
she felt she had been injured and the information concealed from her. [save for hearing file.]
Within days after she was released, she requested copies of her medical records. Initially, she
was given the excuse that the doctor's notes had not been reviewed and that she would be unable
to get copies until the doctor's approved the notes. This was peculiar. The relator left and
returned the following day for her records. At this time, she was given records that were not her
own. Subsequently, the relator wrote a letter to the Director of Fairview Hospital and hand-
delivered it to his office. As of the date of the signing of this motion, she has not received a
response.
Fairview Hospital 18101 Lorain Avenue Cleveland, OH 44111 (216) 476-7000 (Direct)
b. Kaiser Permanente Medical Center. In October 1999 relator approached
this medical facility complaining of lightheadedness and nauseousness. She was examined and
diagnosed as having an unusually high percentage of E-H gas in her system. In 2006, however,
11 when the relator requested copies of her medical records, those records were replaced by others.
When relator proceeded to file a lawsuit against this facility for genuine copies of her medical records, respondent intervened and her case was dismissed.
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Emergency Medical Unit 5410 Lancaster Road Brooklyn Heights, OH 44131 (216) 621-7100 (Direct) (216) 635-4453 (Medical Records) Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Court Case No. CV-06-590457; Rashada vs. Kaiser Permanente
c. Lutheran Hospital. Relator visited this medical facility on several
occasions between 2002 through 2006. On one specific occasion, when she approached its
Emergency Room complaining of a tightness in her chest, she was immediately given an IV and
treated with 9,000 milligrams of sodium chloride before she was examined [?] When relator
asked why, she was told that it was routine. Later, when relator requested copies of her medical
records, she discovered that they were silent concerning the reason for the large dosage of
sodium chloride.
Lutheran Hospital 18101 Lorain Avenue Cleveland, OH 44111 (216) 476-7124 (Direct)
d. Veterans Administration Medical Center. The relator visited this facility
on numerous occasions. In addition to recorded false psychiatric diagnoses in her medical
records, on one occasions, during 1998, the relator approached the Emergency Room of this
facility complaining of chest pains. She was examined and given X-rays of her chest. The X-
rays showed am item in her chest cavity (just below here clavicles) that glowed. When the
relator asked the doctor what it was, he told her that it he did not know what it was or whether it
12 was responsible for the pain in her chest. He told her to take Tylenol and that the pain would probably disappear in a day or so. Later, when the relator requested copies of the X-ray mentioned above, the copy she received did not reflect the item that glowed. When she pointed this out to the records keeper and asked her to search her X-ray files again, the records keeper searched her entire files and found no X-ray showing the item that glowed. Nonetheless, this is what happens when people presume to take liberties with in experimenting with the persons of others without their consent; something is bound to happen that will bring it to their awareness.
Veterans Administration Medical Center 10701 East Boulevard Cleveland, OH 44107 (216) 791-3800 x 5331
9. Psychiatric Health.
a. Pretentious Diagnoses. In March 1999, while living at The Chesterfield
Apartments in Downtown Cleveland, the relator became lightheaded, nauseous, and experienced
shortness of breath. She left her apartment and went to the Security Desk located on the first
floor to report that a changed occurred in her apartment that caused her discomfort and that she
believed it was related to an electromagnetic force field. The security person contacted Building
Management and relator contacted the Illuminating Company that sent a serviceman to
investigate. The serviceman reported he could find no problems with the power. While all this
was happening, someone from Building Management called the security person and instructed
her to contact Emergency Medical Service (EMS). EMS arrived and carried the relator to St.
Vincent Charity Hospital where she was examined by an emergency room doctor. When the
relator explained what she thought had happened, the doctor stated that he had never heard of
electromagnetic force field (EMFs) and deferred the relator to the on-duty examining
psychiatrist, a Dr. Muzina. Relator spoke with Dr. Muzina for approximately 10 or 15 minutes.
13 Dr. Muzina said he found nothing wrong with her; but suggested that she might want to speak with a counselor in the future should a change in the electromagnetic force field reoccur.
In the Spring of 2006, however, when the relator requested copies of her medical records from St. Vincent, she learned that Dr. Muzina had documented information in her records that did not reflect what he had told her when she was examined by him in 1999. In fact, he had documented that he believed she had mental problems. Dr. Muzina also worked at the Cleveland
Clinic Foundation. As it were, not only Dr. Muzina, and other doctors as well, wrote false mental health diagnoses of the relator that she believes was at the behest of the respondent. A list of all facilities that wrote secret psychiatric diagnoses in her medical records is attached hereto and included herein as Appendix B.
Relator firmly believes that the false diagnoses were created for the purpose of inducing the relator into a mind control espionage project under the pretext of a terrorist watch and the
USA Patriot Act. In the event respondent denies that it did not take the liberty of influenced the induction of false psychiatric diagnoses into the relator's records and did not performed surgical and others procedures her, the relator would agree to examinations to be conducted by physicians and other specialists in the presence of this Supreme Court. Said examinations should include
CAT scans; angiograms, echocardiograms, electrocardiograms; X-rays; lab tests to determine blood content and any other procedures needed to prove her allegations.
Relator believes that substances, namely that of MELANIN 5 (and possibly other substances), are frequently extracted from her brain and that the resultine effects have affected her muscular skeletal system and other parts of her body. She further believes that this repeated practice is a contributor to a small white spot on her scalp. There was a rumor going about a few years ago in relation to melanin, in which someone said something to the effect that ". . . She can
14 regenerate more of it". Relator has often awakened to the feeling that something was removed from her head while she was asleep. She has also awakened to pain in her arms, knees, and legs.
When the relator first began to realize these pains, she approached the McCafferty Health Clinic where she was diagnosed with osteoarthritis. Relator disputes this diagnosis and believes the condition in her knees stems from the extraction of the substances from her brain.
The relator approached a doctor at the University Hospitals for an examination based on
her suspicions of alopecia areata and vitiligo. The result of this doctor's examined was neeative.
Since that examination, however, the deniwnented spot in her hair has become somewhat larger.
Relator believes other substances were removed from her body as well, namely that of
stem cells and bone marrow.
b. Informed Consent (IC). In October 2007, the relator approached the
dental office indicated below for tooth extractions:
Charles Haddad, DDS 510 Superior Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114 (216) 621-3675 (Direct)
When her tooth was extracted, there was a microchip in it. Relator believes that respondent
insinuated its personnel in place of Dr. Haddad's personnel for purpose of confiscating the tooth.
After the tooth extractions, relator was given two prescriptions: (i) IC Amoxicillin (500 MG
capsule TEV); and (ii) IC Acetaminophen/COD #3 (Tablet TEV).
Although relator had, on previous occasions, taken the same prescriptions, she did not
recall them bearing the IC prefix. What is more, the effects of the IC prescriptions were
different. The Amoxicillin made her feel groggy and depressed and the Acetaminophen failed to
register any analgesic affect. In researching the IC prefix, relator discovered that it signifies
"Informed Consent". Informed Consent is defined as a legal condition whereby a person can be
15 said to have given consent based upon an appreciation and understanding of the facts and implications of an action. The individual needs to be in possession of relevant facts and also of his reasoning faculties, such as not being mentally retarded or mentally ill and without any
impairment of judgment (illness, intoxication, insufficient sleep and other health problems) at the time of the consenting process. Some acts cannot legally take place because of a lack of
informed consent. In cases where an individual is considered unable to give informed consent,
another person is generally authorized to give consent on their behalf. Examples of this include
the parents or legal guardians of a child and caregivers for the mentally ill. In cases where an
individual is provided limited facts, serious ethical issues may arise. [Wikipedia] However, it is
relator's belief that the dentist who extracted her teeth, as well as his assistant, were not the usual
personnel operating that office and that these people were government operatives. Furthermore,
no discussions concerning the real nature of those medications were discussed with her by these
operatives. Therefore, relator cannot legally be deemed as having given "Informed Consent" and
believes the matter of Informed Consent is housed within her sealed medical records.
10. Apartment Applications. After vacating CMHA-Riverview in January of 2007,
the relator spent most of 2007 (March through December), searching for an apartment. She
would place one application after another with several apartment dwellings and the average
turnaround time to process her application was approx. 2 to 3 weeks as opposed to the usual 2 to
3 days. Relator believes the reason for the extended turnaround time was relative to a trial period
granted the management personnel of those apartment dwellings in which respondent granted
them an opportunity to see how intelligence technologies worked on the relator. Relator believes
they were teleported into her hotel residences to do to her what everybody else was doing to her
and to decide if they liked it or not. Once they decided they were not interested in the program,
16 they denied her apartment application thereby forcing her to find another residence where the personnel there would cooperate with respondent's designs on the her. A list of the apartment dwellings where relator places applications is attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Appendix C.
Relator investigated her credit record and learned that false information had been entered into it. She also learned that Credit Bureau inquiries for these above apartment dwellings were made by various "Member Nos,". Each Member No. is listed in the right-hand column besides each apartment dwelling. Relator also learned that the Member No. making inquiries for the dwellings listed above in paragraphs d, e, f, j, k, were all made by the same Member No.
00287012. Relator approached the Credit Bureau--
a. TransUnion POB 2000 Chester, PA 29022-2000 via of subpoena and requested the formal identity of this Member No. 00287012 and was
informed that that number identifies the following named party:
b. CBCAmRent POB 605 Columbus, OH 43215 Direct telephone number: (888) 898-6196 Facsimile number: (866) 252-4470 Web page: www.cbcinnovis.com.
CBCAmRent is a partner or division of:
c. CBClnnovis 170 East Town Street Columbus, OH 43215 Director telephone: (614) 222-5555 Facsimile number: (614) 222-5657 Web page: www.cbcinnovis.com
17 According to CBCAmRent, both agencies are doing business as "'third party resellers of credit reports' from the three national Consumer Reporting Agencies and do not maintain a database of credit information out of which new reports can be produced." At the time relator
submitted applications to the above dwellings, she also submitted an application fee to cover the
cost of the credit report and in some instances, a deposit to hold the apartment. If CBCAmRent
cannot generate new reports, what was the purpose of the application fee? Who received the
monies. In instances where a deposit was required with the application, when my applications
were turned down, only the deposit was returned; not the fee for the credit report [?]
Nonetheless, relator believes CBCAmRent and CBClnnovis are shells that are used by
errant personnel representing government office and operations (i.e., Secretary of State watch
program participants; the Office of the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor; and others) to operate in
their own interests. Relator believes the parties listed in the right-hand column beside each of
the above dwellings (as Member No.) may be located in each government office listed above and
possibly others.
11. Hotel Residences (Temporary). Relator lived in temporary hotel residences for a
period of ten (10) months throughout 2007 during her search for a permanent residence. She was
sexually assaulted, battered, and harassed in all of them. A list of said hotels is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as Appendix D.
12. Permanent Dwellings and Present Address. The Highland House Apartments,
11810 Lake Avenue, Lakewood, Ohio ("Highland House"). This residence is managed by
Niederst Management, 21400 Lorain Road, Fairview Park, Ohio ("Niederst"). Relator moved
into this residence in January 2008 and was immediately assaulted and harassed by operatives
facilitating Remote Viewing and Teleportation Technologies. Relator recorded these incidents in
18 Journals and complained to the property managers, to no avail. The reports were dated January
21, 2008; August 12, 2008 and October 22, 2008. Property management reported that since relator had no proof, there was nothing they could do about it.
a. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) The Riverview Tower Apartments 1795 West 25th Street Cleveland, OH 44113 (216) 348-5000 (Direct)
(Resided from November 1, 2002 through January 31, 2007)
b. Relator's present address: Highland House Apartments 11810 Lake Avenue Cleveland, OH 44107 (216) 227-9191 (Management Office)
Managed by: Niederst Management, Ltd. POB 16685 Rocky River, OH 44116 (440) 331-8800 (Direct) (440) 331-8815 (FAX)
(Presently residing since January 2008)
13. Public Utilities. Relator believes that her gas bills (and possibly her electricity
bills) were crammed to include the cost of heating furnished facilities provided by her landlord
for respondent's watch camp.
14. Legal Representation. Over the past several years and at different intervals,
relator sought legal counsel to represent her in complaints for assault and harassment, but was
restrained from doing so because respondent intervened. Those agencies and persons are listed
immediately below:
a. Legal Aide Society 1223 West 6`h Street Cleveland, OH 44113 (216) 687-1900 (Direct)
19 b. Lisa M. Haywood, LLC Attorney at Law 21 West Columbus Street Pickerington, OH 43147 (614) 920-1764 (Direct) (614) 920-1765 (FAX) (330) 253-6630 (Akron Office Direct)
Correspondence to Ms. Haywood concerning legal representation was forwarded sometime in 2006. The relator came to live at her present residence in 2008. Ironically, Ms.
Haywood is a Property Manager of the apartment complex where the relator resides. This was not done by any design on the relator's behalf for the purpose of harassment. Relator was ftilly unaware of this at the time she moved into her present residence.
c. Cochran Law Firm 580 LL&E Tower 909 Poydras Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 (866) 321-1580 (Direct) (504) 588-1589 (FAX)
In the matter of the Cochran Law Firm, relator believes her e-mail to the late Mr.
Cochran was intercepted by operatives of the respondent who sent her a return e-mail under the name of the Cochran firm. At the time the relator sent her e-mail request to Mr. Cochran, he had already been diagnosed with brain tumors but was still practicing law. Within a short time after the relator received the e-mail response, Mr. Cochran passed away. Relator suspects foul play and recorded her feelings in her Journals at that time.
15. Cases Commandeered. Respondent intervened by commandeering the assigned courtrooms and insinuating themselves in place of judicial personnel to intercept monies rightfully due the relator in connection with said cases and to otherwise manipulate their outcome. A list of said cases is attached here and incorporated herein as Appendix E. In the
20 matter of State ex rel. Rashada vs. Pianka, there was some confusion at the Housing Court level concerning multiple plaintiffs were involved in relator's case. Relator had no knowledge of any such multiple plaintiffs that were involved in her case at the time she filed this case at the
Housing Court level or the Supreme Court and still has no such knowledge. She was the sole plaintiff at the Housing Court level and the sole relator at the Supreme Court level. Moreover, if there were any party relator's involved, they failed to notify the relator. In any event, the
Judgment Entry in this case was addressed to the relator ONLY. If further actions were taken by alleged "multiple relators" in connection with this Court's Judgment Entry, those actions were taken without this relator's knowledge, approval, and awareness. A copy of that Judgment Entry is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Appendix F.
16. Religious and Other Organizations. Religious, and other private organizations, have been appointed to act in respondent's behalf under the pretext of the USA Patriot Act, and any other law, are to electronically censor her and share her home computer without any cooperation from the relator. A copy of a November 5, 2008 letter is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Appendix G.
17. Veterans' Pension and Social Security.
a. Pension Benefits. As far back as late 2006, Department of Veterans
Administration, Office of Veterans Affairs began sending letters to the relator claiming she was being overpaid on her pension benefits. Relator sent several replies that apparently were ignored by this office. In December 2007, Veterans Affairs discontinued relator's pension benefits.
Relator disputed its claim and filed appeals, waivers and other documents in which she furnished
additional information requested by Veterans Affairs.
21 b. Social Security Administration. Despite the fact that Veterans Affairs denied the relator her right to an appeal hearing, it contacted the Social Security Administration to begin deducting the monthly sum of $200.00 from relator's social security benefits in payment for its alleged overpayment. The deductions began in July of 2008 and have continued to the date of this motion. Veterans are allowed to claim both veterans' pension and social security benefits up to a set amount. Relator also filed a hearing request with this agency concerning the deductions. This agency did not deny her request. It simply ignored it.
c. Forgeries. Furthermore, in December 2007, in reviewing her VA file, the relator discovered documents that were obviously contrived and placed inside her file and called the matter to the attention of the VA Inspector General.
The pension benefits matter has been pending for almost three (2) years. Throughout that period of time, relator has at different intervals been contacted by Veterans Affairs asking for the same
information. In September 2008, relator filed an administrative lawsuit against Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration in the U.S. District Court. Although it was clearly an
administrative law case, the District Court dismissed. . The matter concerning the forgeries has been pending for over a year. Neither has been resolved. Relator firmly believes that the matters
stated herein are the results of the assault and harassment perpetuated against her under the pretext of a terrorist watch and the USA Patriot Act.
18. Public Libraries. Respondent and its assigns have acted as dramatists who have
made it a practice of putting personnel at the places she frequents on false alerts, asking them to
contact them immediately upon her arrival and asking them to follow her into the ladies' room,
etc., thereby abusing the emergency terrorist watch alerts, when all respondent wants is to keep
track of the relator for personal reasons that include keeping abreast of the possibility of new
22 contacts for their private business. Relator asserts here her theory that the abuse of terrorist watch alerts has also been demonstrated in larger ways that include "staging false events" as an excuse to continue harassing her and possibly others. Relator has taken notice of the fact that this pattern seems to occur immediately following a Journal recording in which she makes a pointed enough statement to warrant a staged event, the kind used to distract the public's attention. Nevertheless, the relator frequents the following public libraries:
a. Cleveland Public Library - Eastman Branch 11602 Lorain Avenue Cleveland, OH 44111 (216) 623-6955 (Direct)
b. Fairview Park County Library 21255 Lorain Road Fairview Park, OH (440) 333-4700 (Direct)
The main branch of the Fairview Park County Library is 2111 Snow Road, Parma,
Heights, Ohio.
19. Storage and Other Facilities. Over the past several years, the relator, at different intervals, placed personal files and other items into storage bins only to have them confiscated
(without warrant) by respondent under the pretext of a watch for terrorist activities and the USA
Patriot Act. A list of said storage facilities is attached hereto and included herein as Appendix
H.
20. Others Not Mentioned. Any person, office, agency or any other entity, not mentioned in this complaint, that is acting with the respondent in assaulting, harassing and stealing from the relator was probably omitted by accident or without the relator's knowledge and should also be restrained.
23 ARGUMENT
Sacrifice. Sometime around the turn of the century (circa 2000), the relator began to hear murmurs that included the term "sacrifice". The word would circulate for a time, subside, and then start circulating again. But what or who the term was connected to was never clearly stated.
Later, around relator believes that it was late in 2005 or early in 2006, when she began to hear the term again. Something of a gut instinct made her realize that the term was related to her, although at that time, she was unclear as to how. Recently, the term arose again and relator's gut instinct gave her to believe that it was in some manner related to the taking possession of her mind via technology. This was peculiar, however, as taking possession of something is one thing and "sacrifice," another. Sacrifice hinted at something a little different. Something to do with rituals and trade-offs and indeed, relator is confident that ritual is involved. Over the past several months, she has recorded several Journal entries in which she states that she has occasionally awakened to the smell of condensation -- perhaps the damp odor that descends after a small fire has burned out. At other intervals, the relator discovered very slight burn marks at the center of her eyelids; sometimes she experienced minor difficulty opening her eyes and attributed this to the fact that someone apparently pressed firmly on her eyelids while she was sleeping. This happened a few days ago. On the morning of June 16, 2009, she (again) experienced a slow- down in her thinking processes and attributes this to the fact that she was probably injected with
something while sleeping.
But, who in this nation has a legal right to sacrifice another and what of a trade-off? It is
relator's belief that the assigns appointed by respondent the task of sacrificing her, did so in
exchange for nothing more than flesh pleasures. In the streets vernacular, it is called, "Getting
played". Bamboozled. . Bewitched. Schmoozed. Respondent manipulated their assigns by
24 making them think they were coming from one place, while they were in route from another.
The carelessness in all this is that their assigns knew they had no personal rapport with the relator and did not view her mind as a relevant part of their existence. This is where they were bamboozled. They did not realize something had shifted on a higher spiritual plain. But, respondent realized it before they approached their assigns to solicit their cooperation. In point of fact, this was the determining factor. But their assigns might have taken a hint from the fact that so many people were willing to get involved; or the common sense knowledge that someone who would take possession of the mind of another, would also take possession of theirs; and the fact that despite the many complaints the relator submitted to offices of government, (and they were in a position to know), none of those offices has thus seen fit to call a halt to the assaults on her and remove all technologies from her apartment dwelling that make it possible. Respondent deceived its assigns by falsely leading them to believe that they were extraordinary in that they were recruited to participate in a watch for terrorist activities; that they had rights no other citizen had: The right of sacrifice. But, the reality is that no man possesses a legal right to sacrifice
another or to consent to his sacrifice and respondent knew this when it approached its assigns.
But, respondent discounted perception in that it never thought anyone would be the wiser for it.
So why lead a citizen to believe he has rights that he does not have while failing to uphold the
rights he does have? The answer is, respondent was looking ahead. It knew that at some point
it might need someone to lay on the blame should its game plan go awry. Respondent used
government office and power to recruit its assigns to aide it in fulfilling a personal agenda under
the auspices of the USA Patriot Act. Some laws governing terrorism were promulgated before
the enactment of the USA Patriot Act and the World Trade Center, albeit not as drastically, was
attacked before the enactment of this Act. Even so, if civilians were recruited for terrorist watch
25 programs then, it was a well-kept secret. Aside from all this, the relator was being censored and
secretly assaulted before the enactment of the USA Patriot Act. In 1994, relator read a report compiled by former State Representative Cynthia McKinney. The gist of Representative
McKinney's report is that a small number of people in this nation were cited for mind control agendas and counterintelligence technology (i.e., MKUltra, etc.) was being used on them. At the time though, relator was unaware that it was being used on her. But, it was after September 11,
2001 (hereinafter "9-1-1) that the worst of censorship, assault, harassment and theft was perpetuated against the relator which, to her, raised questions as to why and how 9-1-1 ever
happen? In early 2003 or 2004, relator would write a theory concerning this matter. She opined
that the planes that struck the World Trade Center were not flown into the Center. But, they
were perhaps thrown into the Center and suggested the possibility of the intervention of an
electromagnetic force field. While preparing this Motion, in writing the paragraph titled,
Invisibility Camouflage, her memory of her theory on 9-1-1 came to mind and inspired her to
make some edits to this theory. Namely, the fact that United States Ships (U.S.S.) are large
transporter vehicles (approx. 300 to 330 feet in length); tall and run deep beneath the water line;
and weigh several tons. It may not matter the size of a vehicle where teleportation is concerned.
But, if a Navy destroyer, such as the U.S.S. Eldridge could be teleported (during an experiment)
from the yard at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, all the way to Norfolk, Virginia and back again in
1943. Who is to say that a couple of jet airliners could not have been teleported into the World
Trade Center in 2001? The following was excerpted from Paragraph 4. Invisibility
Camouflage, line 14:
.. This research was continued throughout the years. While it was initially aimed at electronic
camouflage, it was later extended to the study of creating invisibility by using a similar field in the
air instead of water. "
26 How many people died in the catastrophe of 9-1-1? Comparatively, how many people are involved in this pretentious terrorist watch? Or, how many people are involved in the espionage caper designed to take possession of the relator's mind as though it were a life line and what is to justify it? What major event; what major trauma would justify this to the people?
There are people who are of a nature such that when they seek to harm some one, they look (in advance) for pre-justification; for some one or some thing to lay on the blame for their evil deeds. Relator's suggests that the mindset works in the following manner:
A pretentious voice speaks to them -- skating past the fact that respondent has censored and secretly attacked the relator since before 9-1-1, saying: "We suspect her of involvement in terrorists' activities. Nevertheless,... We believe she had some involvement in the events that occurred on 9-1-1 and must therefore be placed on the terrorist watch list. Then during the watch
-- "We have discovered certain theories and ideas she created that may be terrorist related and although they have commercial potential, we retain the right to take possession of them, her mind and everything else related to her. We further believe she has had some involvement in the Mumbai situation (this from some who claimed to be helping relator resolve the confliction).
If government officials who have no knowledge of this should inquire about this, we will tell them that she is being watched pursuant to the Patriot Act or something like that ...".
Scope. The scope of what is stated here reaches beyond relator's motion.
Counterintelligence technology was used on segments of the general populace at least as far back as the 1960's when fighting for civil rights; minorities groups also protested assaults on them with counterintelligence technology. As the relator stated earlier in this motion, she is aware of
being censored since the early 1980s; but that the worst of it followed the assaults on the World
Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Relator also stated that according to a report written by
27 State Representative McKinney, spoke of a number of citizens of this nation were victims of mind control experiments. Although this report spoke to a number of non-voluntary victims, based on relator's experience, she believes that the insurgence of mental illness and other
diseases formally found in small percentages or unfounded amongst the minority population, are
strong indicators of other victims of mind control experimentation. Cases of Dementia Praecox
were diagnosed amongst the general populace many years ago. But, relator believes that approx.
20 to 25 years ago, an insurgence in the popularity of other mental and other diseases discovered
amongst minority peoples (i.e., multiple sclerosis; bipolar disorder and schizoid-effective
disorder) are strong indicators of a higher number of victims. Be it said also that it is relator's
belief that the same technologies and instrumentation were also used on her mother and that it
ultimately lead to her total paralysis and inability to speak before she finally passed away in
2007. Relator believes that anyone who has been diagnosed with the diseases listed here are
(most probably) victims of mind control experiments as all of these illnesses are stated in false
psychiatric reports written by physicians under respondent's influence. Relator believes the
pretentious reports were placed in her medical files, not because they are accurate concerns; but
because they are goal projections -- they are the anticipated end results of the effects on her of
mind control experiments and the use of counterintelligence technology. All of the non-
voluntary participation in this is assigned to the victims here; but, the medical facilities and
physicians listed in Appendix B of this motion who non-voluntarily submitted that they are
involved in mind control experimentation.
Earlier in this motion, relator speaks of mirror reflections of the terrorist within. What
terror could be more profound than one realizing the need to kidnap the person's of others and
steal their minds to secure one's own survival?
28 CONCLUSION
The sum of the actions stated here are uncharacteristic of a war on terrorism and are clearly those of an assault on an American citizen perpetuated under the pretext of a watch for terrorist activities and the USA Patriot Act. Respondent has wielded intelligence technologies to take access to the brain functions and life interactions of the relator. Respondents further acted contrarily (at its convenience) in perpetuating vicious acts on the relator in using drug injections
(i.e., dopamine,6 histamines,7 etc.) and other means to intervene in her thinking processes, hoping to deter her, especially during those intervals when she was preparing important documents like this motion. These assaults were not inspired by the acts terrorism by the relator, or any other outward acts of terrorism, but the mirror reflections of the terrorist within themselves, detected by the relator with only a "perception" that is not confined to the ritualistic ravages of the bedchambers of strangers for sense impression understanding.
In complaints submitted to offices of government, relator asked to be contacted to avoid any confusion. If one office elected to investigate her complaints, there would be no need to file other complaints at other offices. After a prolonged period of time, when relator received no contact calls, she complained about this in her reports. Then relator started receiving telephone calls from "800" numbers espousing virtual voices and push button rotaries. Go nowhere telephone numbers. Relator believes these calls were "pretend calls" made by parties acting with the respondent who used the "red phones" that telephone servicemen use when installing telephone numbers; and law enforcement use to intercept telephone calls. For example, the relator received an "800" telephone call from someone who left her name and an "800" number.
When the relator retutned the call, she reached Blue Cross Blue Shield. When she asked for the party by the name that was left, relator was told that there was no such party at that number.
29 Relator therefore believes that the "800" number calls are made by parties acting with the respondent who, under pressure from their superiors, pretended to call the relator to produce a false telephone record. Relator emphasizes here that she has not received any phone calls from offices of government and agencies where she submitted complaints for assaults, et al.
Respondent's has inducted mind control espionage on the relator for no reason other than commercial enterprise and the assault and harassment are torture tools used to try and keep her in line with its enterprise; to try and confuse her and keep her from complaining to some office that would hear her complaints. Heretofore, every time the relator filed a complaint with a different office of government or agency, she was assaulted by a different group of people discerned via of perception. Respondent runs a command center where it services a clientele under the pretext of the USA Patriot Act and a watch for terrorist activities. Respondent's clientele includes many people from various walks of life searching for ideas and information to aide them in their work, schooling, religion, and other concerns, in exchange for money, favors, sex, or other mediums of exchange. Relator made clear to the respondent, both via of letters and journal entries (it has monitored relentless via of her home computer and computers used at public libraries) that she was not interested in its employment or club endeavors. Despite this fact, however, relator has non-voluntarily become respondent's enterprise. It is for these reasons respondent cannot genuinely investigate relator's complaints as it would be counterproductive to its commercial enterprise of espionage and tantamount to slamming a door in its own face. It is for this reason relator has brought this case to this Court. The contents of this Complaint and its Exhibits are but a portion of all that has occurred during the many years that the relator is being censored, assaulted, and harassed. In keeping within the 35 page limit, relator has stated here the most important aspects of which she is aware.
30 WHEREFORE, relator prays that a writ be issued ordering respondent to:
1. Cease inducing mind control espionage and to halt assaulting and harassing her with electronic technology and other instrumentation, and to remove the same from her present residence and public domains and to refrain from same at any future domain and residences; and to seal off her residences from further intrusions by technologies and instrumentation listed in this Complaint, as well as all others not listed which she is yet unaware;
2. Remove syringes distributing drugs into her water supply;
3. Remove all microchips (MICs) and other harmful items from her persons and to produce genuine copies of medical records related thereto;
4. Unseal her medical records (listed in this Complaint and its Exhibits) and to produce genuine copies to her; and all medical records pertaining to surgical and other procedures conducted on her without her consent, as well as any authorizations or consent forms produced by any party falsely claiming to be her power of attorney;
5. Inform the relator when it decides she needs further corrective medical procedures;
6. Remove false psychiatric diagnoses from her medical records;
7. Produce copies of warrants issued for the purpose of confiscating her files,
documents and personal effects, housed in storage and other facilities and to return the same to
her;
8. Relinquish all monies and awards to which she is entitled as a result of the
lawsuits stated in this Complaint and its Exhibits, in which it intervened;
9. Produce copies of all investigation reports related to her complaints for assault
and harassment;
31 10. Release her telephone line and refrain from further harassing telephone calls; and to otherwise refrain from intervening in her life interactions; her personal relations; her business at public libraries and all other locations;
11. Release her home computer and to discontinue assaulting and harassing her by zapping her through her home computer and from transmitting verbal assaults, messages and
sensations through her home computer;
12. Return her New Age Curriculum and business proposal outline and to refrain
from intervening in any future creative endeavors;
13. Remove itself and its assigns and clientele from her present residence, future
residences, and to reimburse her for its share of her rent and utilities bills;
14. Refrain from intervening in her efforts to obtain legal representations;
15. Reinstate her veterans' and social security benefits; or grant her waiver of
(alleged) overpayment;
16. Produce its copies of investigation reports concerning the forgeries found in her
VA file that she reported to the VA Inspector General;
17. Relator prays for punitive and other damages to be assessed by this Court and for
other relief that this Court may deem fair and appropriate.
RespTtfully submitted,
Hanan S. Rashada, In Pro Se POB 14211 Cleveland, OH 44114 (216) 704-9399 Dated: June 22, 2009
32 Footnotes t Legend has it that as far back as the 10th century, pirates and other mysterious beings reportedly used this instrumentation to extract substances from the brains of crewman on vessels they commandeered at sea. [para.3, MKUttra Instrumentation.]
` Einstein published his Unified Theory in German (circa 1925-27); but later withdrew it because it was incomplete. Although incomplete, the severity of the impact of World War II on this nation, necessitated the retrieval of Einstein's theory. [para a, Invisibility camouflage.]
3"Prejudice cripples and injures the full phenomenon of psychic life.... Every judgment made by an individual is conditioned by his personality type and every point of view is necessarily relative." [Carl Gustav Jung]. [para. 5, Remote Viewing.]
4 The Travelodge is also referenced in this complaint as a former residence of the relator. [para. 7(b), Media Participation.1
5 Melanin is a precious substance. Relator asserts here her theory, that the large numbers of young females that go missing are being kidnapped and probably killed for the melanin content in their brains. [para 14(a), Pretentious Diagnoses.]
6 Dopaniine. A catecholamine that is an intermediate in the synthesis of noradrenalin and possibly acts as neurotransmitters. [Conclusion.]
7 Histamine. Histamine is a biogenic amine involved in local immune responses as well as regulating physiological function in the gut and acting as a neurotransmitter. Histamine forms colorless hygroscopic crystals and are easily dissolved in water or ethanol. Histamine released into the synapses if broken down by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase. It is the deficiency of this enzyme that triggers an allergic reaction as histamines pool in the synapses. An important site of histamine storage and release is the enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell of the stomach. Destruction of histamine releasing neurons or inhibition of histamine synthesis leads to an inability to maintain vigilance. It has been found that approx. half the patients classified as suffering from schizophrenia have low histamine levels in the blood. Histamine is an integral part of the immune system and deficiencies of this kind may lead to immune system disorders and allergies. [conciusion.]
33 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
Appendix A Offices of Government a. Ohio Secretary of State 2005; Borden Building 2008 180 East Broad Street Columbus, OH 43215-3707 (877) 767-6446 b. Department of Public Safety 1996 City Hall 601 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114-1027 (216) 664-2200
c. Department of Public Safety 1999; 2003; Chief of Police 2008 Cleveland Police Department 1300 Ontario Avenue Cleveland, OH 44113-1600 (216) 664-2200 (Direct) (216) 664-3734 (FAX)
d. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) 2003; 2004 Chief of Police 5715 Woodland Avenue Cleveland, OH 44104 (216) 426-7760 (Direct) (216) 361-3728 (FAX)
e. Department of Public Safety 2008 Office of Professional Standards 205 West St. Clair Avenue, Ste. 301 Cleveland, OH 44113 (216) 664-2944 (Direct) (216) 420-8764 (FAX)
Narrative. Received response dated May 5, 2009 to complaint filed in October 2008 with
Office of Professional Standards. The response under the signature of Thomas F. Jones,
Chairman, Cleveland Police Review Board, states that relator's complaint for assault and
harassment are "unfounded".
1 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
f. Mayor Frank G. Jackson 2007;2008 City of Cleveland 601 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114-1027 (216) 664-3990 g• Federal Bureau of Investigation 2003-2006 1501 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114-1138 (216) 522-1400 h. Federal Bureau of Investigation 1999;2003 J. Edgar Hoover Building 935 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20535-0001 (202) 324-3000 i. Senator Sherrod Brown 2007 600 Superior Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114-2600 (216) 522-7272
Narrative. Approached this office with complaint. Referred to office of Ohio Attorney
General. j. Ohio Attorney General 2001-2203; 30 East Broad Street, 17t" Floor 2008-2009 Columbus, OH 43215-3428 (877) 244-6446 k. U.S. Attorney General 2007;2009 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 (202) 353-1555
Narrative. Recent complaint to the U.S. Attorney General was transmitted (in several
parts) via of electronic mail. Receipt of the first two (2) parts was confirmed.
1. U.S. Attorney 1999-2003; 801 West Superior Avenue 2007 Cleveland, OH 44113 (216) 622-3600
2 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
M. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 1996-2003 Justice Center Building 1200 Ontario Avenue, 8`" and 9th Floors Cleveland, OH 44113 (216) 443-7800 (Direct) (216) 698-2270 (FAX) n. Cuyahoga County Sheriffs Office 2001;2006 1215 West 3rd Street Cleveland, OH 44113 (216) 443-6000 o. Office of the Surgeon General 1999;2000 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 18-66 Rockville, MD 20857 (301) 443-4000 (Direct) (301) 443-3574 p. Inspector General 2008 Department of Veterans Affairs 1240 East 9th Street Cleveland, OH 44199 (216) 522-3648 x 3421 (800) 827-1000
3 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
Appendix B Psychiatric Health
a. Cleveland Clinic Foundation Health Systems 1999; 2002 Dr. David Muzina Dr. Budur 9500 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44107 (216) 444-2200
b. Thomas F. McCafferty Health Center 2003 Dr. Heather Mullens 4242 Lorain Avenue Cleveland, OH 44113 (216) 651-5005
c. Northeast Ohio Neighborhood Health Center - 2005 Dr. Felix Nwaokafor 8300 Hough Avenue Cleveland, OH 44103 (216) 231-7700 *Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-06-588733; Rashada vs. NEON When relator learned this medical center is government funded, she dismissed this case. She believes the false psychiatric diagnoses in its records was supplied to it by respondent, et al.
d. St. Michael's Hospital 2001 Dr. Lovette Phillips, DO 2351 East 22nd Street Cleveland, OH 44115 (216) 861-6200 Case No. CV 06-588846 Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Rashada vs. St. Michael's Hospital
e. St. Vincent Charity Hospital 1999 Dr. David Muzina Dr. Joseph Haluska 2351 East 22nd Street Cleveland, OH 44115 (216) 861-6200
1 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
f. University Hospitals Health System 1999 Dr. Burrell 11100 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44106 (216) 844-1000
g• Veterans Administration Medical Center 1999 Dr. Kenneth Wener Dr. Barbara Budziak 10701 East Boulevard Cleveland, OH 44107 (216) 791-3800 x 5331
h. Murtis H. Taylor Multi-Service Center 1999 Unknown Physicians 1862 Noble Road Cleveland, OH 44112 (216) 681-2141 x 102 (Direct Telephone) (216) 681-2146 (FAX)
i. Jerry Purcell, Social Worker Golden Age Centers of Greater Cleveland, Inc. 12200 Fairhill Road Cleveland, OH 44120 (216) 231-6500
2 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
Appendix C Apartment Applications
a. The Carrollton I, II, and III 2860 Van Aken Boulevard Cleveland, OH 44120-2212
Narrative: Relator made an appointment to see these apartments. When she arrived for her appointment, no one answered the door and there was no sign on the door. Relator called to leave a message in the voicemail; but never received a return call.
b. Paradise Property Management Company Credit Bureau inquiry made 11820 Edgewater Drive by Member No. 00001208 Lakewood, OH 44107 (216) 226-3906
c. The Winston (Apartments) Credit Bureau inquiry made 18225 Detroit Avenue by Member No. 00004009 Cleveland, OH 44107-3321
d. Westview Acres Apartments Credit Bureau inquiry made 9755 Westview Drive by Member No. 00287012 Parma, OH 44129 and ID No. 33DS51674 (216) 749-5822 Owners: Westview Associated, Ltd. C & J lanni, Inc.; 5248 Knollwood Drive Parma, OH 44129
C. Parma Woods Apartments Credit Bureau inquiry made 9750 Westview Drive by Member No. 00287012 Parma, OH 44129
f. Aberdeen Commons (Apartments) Credit Bureau inquiry made 22445 Lorain Road by Member No. 00287012 Fairview Park, OH 44126 (440) 212-9792
g. King's Path Condominiums Credit Bureau inquiry made 25735 Lorain Road by Member First USA NA; North Olmsted, OH 44070-0021 no number stated. Owned by Gary Ross, Property Agent * Fair Ridge Properties, Inc. 22455 Bard Avenue
1 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
Fairview Park, OH 44126 Managed by: Renner Management Group, Inc. (Eric, Manager; 686-1269) 10147 Royalton Road Suites D and E North Royalton, OH 44133 (440) 237-5567 - DIR; (440) 237-3995 - FAX
h. Randall House Apartments (Beth, Agent) Credit Bureau inquiry made 19420 Lorain Road by Member No. 00023404 Cleveland, OH 44126 (440) 777-9600; and (440) 333-5977
i. Fairview Park Manor Apartments See narrative below. 19740 Lorain Road Fairview Park, OH 44126-1938 (440) 476-5963
Narrative. Relator submitted an application at Fairview Park Manor Apartments. She
withdrew her application later on the same day when she was given to believe that the person
who took her application was not an actual representative of that apartment dwelling.
J• Alba Villa Apartments Credit Bureau inquiry made 11115 Lake Avenue by Member No. 00287012; Cleveland, OH 44102 and ID No. 09DS44107 (216) 281-5999
Narrative: Alba Villa granted an apartment to the relator and withdrew it the night
before she was to sign the lease agreement. Relator filed a lawsuit against Integrity
Management, the operator of said apartment dwelling. The case was not heard and dismissed by
respondent.
k. Highland House Apartments Credit Bureau inquiry made 11810 Lake Avenue by Member No. 00287012 Lakewood, OH 44107-1875
Narrative. Relator presently resides at the Highland House Apartments (since January
2008) where she has continued to be assaulted and harassed. She believes teleportation and
other technologies are housed on the premises.
2 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
1. The Chesterfield Apartments Credit Bureau Inquiry made 1801 East 12th Street by Member No. 01407281 Cleveland, OH 44114-3500
Narrative. Relator lived at The Chesterfield Apartments for one month (February 2007) where she was also assaulted and harassed. This is a large apartment dwelling in downtown Cleveland. Relator also lived in this apartment dwelling for eight (8) months (January through August) in 1999. She was also assaulted and harassed then also, but not to the extent that she has since then.
3 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
Appendix D Hotel Residences (Temporary)
a. Days Inn 12019 Lake Avenue Lakewood, OH 44107-1805 (216) 226-4800 b. Best Value Inn 14043 Brookpark Road Brook Park, OH 44142-1702 (216) 267-2350
c. Days Inn 16161 Brookpark Road Brook Park, OH 44142-1624 (216) 267-5100
d. Howard Johnson's Inn 16644 Snow Road Brook Park, OH 44142 (216) 676-5200
e. Days Inn 24399 Lorain Road North Olmsted, OH 44070 (440) 777-4100
f. Travelodge of Lakewood 11837 Edgewater Drive Lakewood, OH 44107 (216) 221-9000
Country Inns Hotel 20540 Lorain Road Fairview Park, OH 44126-3424 (440) 333-1100 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
Appendix E Cases Commandeered
a. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Rashada vs. Integrity Management Case No. 07-CV-643103 b. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Rashada vs. Avis Rent A Car System, LLC, et al. Case No. 08-CV-656737 c. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Rashada vs. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al. Administrative Law Case No. 1:08MC83 d. Cleveland Municipal Court - Small Claims Division Rashada vs. Gil Dor Furniture Store Case No. 07-CV-014086 e. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division Rashada vs. U.S. Attorney General Case No. 07-CV-01055 iCite as State e.r rel. Ras+-dg v. Pianka, 112 Ohio St.3d 44, 2006-Ohio-6366.1
Appendix F
THE STATE EX REL. RASHADA, APPELLANT, V. PIANKA, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [C'te as State ex reL Rashada v. Pianka, 112 Ohio St.3d 44, 2006-Ohio-6366.] Mandatnus-Coinplaint against judge to compel specifc judgnaent dismissed. (No. 2006-1055 - Submitted October 17, 2006 - Decided December 20, 2006.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 87450, 2006-Ohio-2584.
Per Curiain. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint for a writ of mardamus to compel a municipal court judge to enter a specific jud;*ment. Because the complaint fails to state a potentially viable mandamus claim, we
affitm. {¶ 2} In Rashada's appeal as of right, Rashada asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing her mandamus claim. Dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is appropriate if, after all factual allegations are presumed true and all reasonable inferences are made in Rashada's favor, it appears beyond doubt that she could prove no set of facts warranting the requested extraordinary relief in mandamus. See, e.g., State ex rel. Talwar v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio, 104 Ohio St.3d 290, 2004-Ohio-6410, 819 N.E.2d 654, ¶ 5. {¶ 3} This standard was satisfied here because mandamus will not lie to control judicial discretion, even if that discretion is abused. See, e.g., State ex rel. Natl. City Bank v. Maloney, 103 Ohio St.3d 93, 2004-Ohio-4437, 814 N.E.2d 58, 11 11; R.C. 2731.03. Consequently, mandamus will not issue to compel Judge Pianka to enter a specific judgment on Rashada's underlying counterclaim. Nor is extraordinary relief available to challenge Judge Pianka's discretionary lulings in StJPREME COURT OF OHIO
that case. Berthelot v. Dezso (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 257, 259, 714 N.E.2d 888 ("given the discretionary authority vested in Judge Dezso in discovery matters * * *, an extraordinary writ will not issue to control her judicial discretion, even if that discretion is abused"). {¶ 4) Moreover, Rashada had an adequate remedy at law by appeal to challenge Judge Pianka's Ivlings on her counterclaim in the municipal court case. "Mandamus will not issue if there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law." State ex rel. Mackey v. Blackwell, 106 Ohio St.3d 261, 2005- Ohio-4789, 834 N.E.2d 346, ¶ 21; R.C. 2731.05. {¶ 5} Therefore, Rashada's complaint failed to state a potentially viable mandamus claim, and the court of appeals correctly dismissed it. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of anpeals.
Judgment affirmed.
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR,
O'DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
Hanan S. Rashada, pro se. Robert J. Triozzi, Cleveland Director of Law, and Joseph G. Hajjar, Assistant Director of Law, for appellee.
2 PLED
M C 4.e $uVrrew ^ourt ttf II 4t,a DEC 2 0 2006 MARCIA J. MENGEL, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
State of Ohio ex rel. Hanan S. Rashada Case No. 06-1055
v. JUDGMENT ENTRY
Raymond L. Pianka, Judge APPEAL FROM THE COUR'I' OF APPFALS
This cause, here on appeal from the Coui4 of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. On consideration thereof, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinioti rendered herein.
It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County to carry this judgment into execution and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County for entry.
(Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals; No. 87450)
S J. MOYE Chief Justice Appendix G
CERTIFIED MAIL; RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
November 5, 2008
Department of Legal Affairs Nation of Islam - National Center 7351 South Stony Island Avenue Cleveland, OH 60649
Re: Non-Employment and Other Matters
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please be advised as follows:
1. There are those who believe that I am employed with your Assembly and that this arrangement grants you the right to intervene into my personal and business affairs. No one in your agency has any such authority or right. I do not know who or why this untruth continues to perambulate; but, I would appreciate it if you would put an end to it. If you possess evidence to the contrary, I would appreciate learning about it. Please forward copies to me at the address indicated below. I am especially interested in receiving copies of any payroll and incentive records you have.
2. I am not employed by any agency of the US Government, singularly or by and through your Assembly. If you have evidence to the contrary, I would appreciate learning about it. Please forward copies of your evidence.
3. No court of law has ever appointed any member of your Assembly to act in my behalf as my power of attorney, proxy, guardian or payee in connection with any money transactions, any court cases and hearings connected therewith, any veterans' claims, social security claims, the signing of any leases or the acquisition of any apartment or other living space.
4. I have not appointed anyone in your Assembly as my beneficiary.
5. I have not appointed anyone in your Assembly to represent me in transmitting any information to any acquaintance, associate, friend, or relative of mine that is contained in any of my documents and files. 6. 1 have not granted you the right to access alter or ascertain any documents in my personal or business files in the possession of any business or agency or any of their locations.
7. No court of law has declared me mentally challenged and no member of your Assembly is appointed my power of attorney, guardian or payee. I wrote to you several months ago requesting any medical records you had in your possession. But, I never received a response from you. If you possess evidence to the contrary, I would appreciate learning about it. Forward copies of any evidence you have that refutes my claims.
8. I have never visited Mosque Maryam and have not visited Chicago for any other reasons for a very long time.
5. I am not now, nor have I ever been, married to any member of your Assembly. If you have evidence to the contrary, please forward copies.
6. There is tremendous confliction that has and continues to surround my life interactions. Yet, no one seems able to communicate with me about them. It is very odd to me that anyone should claim a relationship with me that cannot be substantiated visibly. If there is any information that I should be made aware of concerning any rights or authorizations you have concerning me concerning any matter not listed above, I would appreciate learning about and receiving copies of any proof you may have that refutes my claims.
If I do not receive any records from you that refute the claims I have listed here within 10 business days, my claims will be published in a legal newspaper.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Very truly yours,
/S Hanan S. Rashada POB 14211 Cleveland, OH 44114
2 In the Supreme Court of Ohio:
Appendix H Storage and Other Facilities a. The Florida Avenue Storage Company 1701 Florida Avenue, N. W. Washington, D.C. (202) 797-5660
(Items confiscated, without warrant, circa 1993). b. Office of Congressman Louis Stokes Washington, D.C. (Confiscated from former office.)
(Items removed, without warrant, circa 1995-96). c. Uncle Bob's Self-Storage Company 4976 West 130th Street Brookpark, OH 44135 (216) 433-1766
(Items removed, without warrant, circa 2002) d. U-Store It 0512 4720 Warrensville Center Road North Randall, OH 44128 (216) 587-5382
(Boxes of personal items and files were stored in this facility for one year (January 2007 to January 2008). A box containing large black notebook binders was stolen by respondent's operatives during the time it was in the possession of this facility or while it was in the possession of the moving company that transported relator's storage to her present address. The moving company was: e. Beckett & Chambers, Inc. 1786 East 47th Street Cleveland, OH 44103 (216) 881-7171 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Hanan S. Rashada Case No.: POB 14211 Cleveland, OH 44114 Judges: (216) 704-9399
Relator, ) ORIGINAL ACTION
vs.
The Ohio Secretary of State Borden Building 180 East Broad Street Columbus, OH 43215-3707 (877) 767-6446
Respondent.
Please also serve:
Ohio Attorney General 30 East Broad Street, 17th Floor Columbus, OH 43215-3428 (877) 244-6446
U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20535-0000 (800) 869-4499
The United States Congress The Clerk of the House United States Capitol Building, Room H154 Washington, D.C. 20515-6601 (202) 225-7000
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
Hanan S. Rashada POB 14211 Cleveland, OH 44114 (216) 704-9399 PRO SE LITIGANT STATE OF ) ) OHIO, ) ss: ) County of Cuyahoga. )
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION
Hanan S. Rashada, being duly sworn, deposes and says that she resides at 11820 Lake
Avenue, Lakewood, Ohio; that she is the relator in the complaint and that she has read the foregoing complaint and knows the contents thereof and that they are true of her own knowledge, except as to the matters stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters she believes them to be true.
Hanan S. Rashada
Sworn to before me and signed in my presence at Cleveland, Ohio, this ^ day of June, 2009.
ns nnavva A naceW111 Notary Pu611c, Slate of Ohio ; My Commission Expims May 1120113