DOCSLIB.ORG

2020-06-16 Daily Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020-06-16 Daily Report - 1 - Daily Report 142/2020 16 June 2020 1 Summary • Compared with the previous 24 hours, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and fewer in Luhansk region. • Small-arms fire was assessed as directed at three SMM mini-unmanned aerial vehicles flying near Petrivske, Yasynuvata and Kashtanove, all in Donetsk region. • Members of the armed formations continued to deny the Mission passage at checkpoints along official crossing routes in Donetsk and Luhansk regions.* • The Mission recorded ceasefire violations and spotted at night a person within a former position of the armed formations inside the disengagement area near Petrivske. It also saw persons within former positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces inside the disengagement area near Zolote. • The SMM saw howitzers and anti-tank guns in violation of withdrawal lines in non- government-controlled Donetsk city. • The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to critical civilian infrastructure and the operation of the Donetsk Filtration Station. • The SMM again saw that the entry-exit checkpoint in Stanytsia Luhanska was temporarily open and that the corresponding checkpoint of the armed formations remained closed. • The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at two border crossing points in non-government-controlled areas of Luhansk region.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions 4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 15 June 2020. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM cameras in Petrivske, Krasnohorivka and at the Oktiabr Mine were non-operational. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded more ceasefire violations, including more explosions (about 205), compared with the previous 24 hours (about 135 explosions). The majority of ceasefire violations, including almost all explosions, were recorded at south-easterly, southerly and south-westerly directions of Svitlodarsk (government-controlled, 57km north- east of Donetsk). In Luhansk region, the Mission recorded fewer ceasefire violations, including fewer explosions (about 70), compared with the previous 24 hours (about 680 explosions). The majority of ceasefire violations, including almost all explosions, were recorded in areas east of the disengagement area near Zolote (government-controlled, 60km west of Luhansk) (see below). Small-arms fire assessed as directed at SMM mini-unmanned aerial vehicles near non- government-controlled Petrivske, Yasynuvata and Kashtanove, Donetsk region While conducting a mini-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight over the disengagement area near Petrivske (non-government-controlled, 41km south-west of Donetsk), the SMM heard 11 shots and bursts of small-arms fire at an assessed distance of about 3km east, assessed as aimed at the UAV, which was flying about 3km east, near the northern edge of the disengagement area (see below) (for a similar incident in this area, see SMM Daily Report 15 June 2020 ). The SMM safely landed the UAV and left the area.* While conducting a mini-UAV flight over areas near Yasynuvata (non-government- controlled, 16km north-east of Donetsk), the SMM heard 22 shots and bursts of small-arms fire at an assessed range of about 1.5-2km west, assessed as aimed at the UAV, which was flying about 1.5-2km west. The SMM safely landed the UAV and left the area.* While conducting a mini-UAV flight over areas near Kashtanove (non-government- controlled, 13km north of Donetsk), the SMM heard 30 shots of small-arms fire at an assessed range of about 100-300m west, assessed as aimed at the UAV, which was flying about 300m west. The shooting continued as the patrol initiated the UAV’s return. Patrol members safely landed the UAV, while taking cover in SMM vehicles, and then retrieved it and left the area.* Members of the armed formations continued to deny the SMM passage at checkpoints along the contact line in Donetsk and Luhansk regions Members of the armed formations continued to deny the SMM passage at checkpoints in both Donetsk and Luhansk regions along official crossing routes. These restrictions constitute an impediment to the implementation of the Mission’s mandate. 5 In Donetsk region, at a checkpoint north of Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk), a member of the armed formations denied the SMM passage towards non-government-controlled areas, referring to restrictions due to COVID-19. The SMM again saw a metal barrier and spikes laid across the road, as well as a mine hazard sign.* In Luhansk region, at a checkpoint south of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge (15km north-east of Luhansk), two members of the armed formations again denied the SMM passage towards 5 The Mission began facing repeated denials when attempting to cross into non-government-controlled areas at checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk region on 21 March and Luhansk region on 23 March. For more information, see SMM Daily and Spot Reports. - 4 - non-government-controlled areas, referring to the closure of the checkpoint due to COVID- 19.* Disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske 6 Inside the disengagement area near Stanytsia Luhanska (government-controlled, 16km north-east of Luhansk), the SMM saw four members of the armed formations (wearing armbands with “JCCC” written on them) near their checkpoint south of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge. On the evening of 13 June and on the night of 14-15 June, inside the disengagement area near Zolote , an SMM long-range UAV spotted in total three persons within two former positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces south of the railway track and east of road T-1316. On the evening and night of 14-15 June, the SMM camera in Zolote recorded an undetermined explosion, nine projectiles in flight and an illumination flare, all at an assessed range of 3-5km east. On the same evening, the SMM camera in the southern part of the disengagement area recorded an undetermined explosion at an assessed range of 3-5km north. During the day on 15 June, while positioned near Berezivske (non-government- controlled, 53km west of Luhansk), the SMM heard 62 undetermined explosions at an assessed range of 2-3km north. All of these ceasefire violations were assessed as outside the disengagement area but within 5km of its periphery. On 15 June, the Mission saw four members of the armed formations (wearing armbands with “JCCC” written on them) near the southern edge of the disengagement area and two of them walking along road T-1316 inside the disengagement area up to about 350m north of its southern edge. On the night of 13-14 June, inside the disengagement area near Petrivske , an SMM long- range UAV spotted a person within a former position of the armed formations close to the area’s south-eastern corner. On 15 June, while positioned about 2km east of Bohdanivka (government-controlled, 41km south-west of Donetsk), the SMM heard 11 shots and bursts of small-arms fire at an assessed distance of 3km east, assessed as inside the disengagement area near Petrivske (see small- arms fire directed at an SMM mini-UAV above). While positioned at this location and about 2km north of Petrivske, the Mission also heard an undetermined explosion and five bursts of small-arms fire assessed as outside the disengagement area but within 5km of its periphery Withdrawal of weapons The SMM continued to monitor the withdrawal of weapons in implementation of the Memorandum and the Package of Measures and its Addendum. It observed weapons in violation of withdrawal lines in non-government-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, including four howitzers and two anti-tank guns moving west in a convoy in Donetsk city. 6 Disengagement is foreseen in the Framework Decision of the Trilateral Contact Group relating to disengagement of forces and hardware of 21 September 2016. - 5 - The Mission also observed weapons beyond withdrawal lines but outside designated storage sites in government-controlled areas of Donetsk region (for further details, see the tables below). Indications of military and military-type presence inside the security zone 7 The SMM observed armoured combat vehicles in government-controlled areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, including within residential areas, and in non-government-controlled areas of Donetsk region (for further details, see the table below). SMM facilitation of repairs to and maintenance and operation of critical civilian infrastructure The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to the phenol sludge reservoir near Zalizne (formerly Artemove, government-controlled, 42km north-east of Donetsk); vegetation clearance, inspection and maintenance of railway tracks near Vilkhove (government-controlled, 22km north-east of Luhansk); and an assessment of power lines near Berezivske. The Mission continued to facilitate the operation of the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk). While positioned at three locations near the station, the SMM heard two explosions (one assessed as a controlled detonation and one undetermined), as well as shots and bursts of small-arms fire, all assessed as within a 5km radius of the station. Border areas outside government control On
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Situation Overview: Winter Assessment of Government-Controlled Areas Within 5Km of the Line of Contact Ukraine, February 2018
    Situation Overview: Winter Assessment of Government-Controlled Areas within 5km of the Line of Contact Ukraine, February 2018 Introduction & Key Findings Population & Displacement Map 1: Assessed Settlements Shchastia The area along the LoC has a significant Trokhizbenka Artema Eastern Ukraine experiences harsh winters population of vulnerable groups including Krymske Petropavlivka Nyzhnoteple Staryi Aidar lasting from November to March, with Oriikhove Nyzhnie Kriakivka Stanytsia pensioners, internally displaced persons (IDPs) ² Peredilske Luhanska temperatures reaching below -20 degrees Donetsk GCA Zolote Hirske Makarove and returnees. This is as a result of the out- Komyshuvakha Valluiiske Celsius. Such extreme conditions impact migration of less vulnerable people with the Kateryniivka the humanitarian needs of populations living Popasna means and ability to live and work elsewhere. Vilkhove Myronivskyi Novozvanivka in conflict-affected areas due to increased Half of the displaced persons in the area along Svitlodarsk difficulty accessing services, damage to Semyhiria Troiitske the line of contact arrived in 2014, and have no Novoluhanske Kodema critical infrastructure affecting water and Ozarianivka plans to return to their area of origin (AoO) in Druzhba heating systems, and decreased availability Toretsk the foreseeable future due to security concerns, Pivnichne of nutritious foods. These issues are more political differences, or lack of accommodation. Zalizne NovhorodskeNovhoro ske pronounced along the line of contact (LoC) The
    [Show full text]
  • Transformations of the Cultural Landscape of Donbas During the Armed Conflict 2015–2017
    Studia z Geografii Politycznej i Historycznej tom 6 (2017), s. 305–326 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2300-0562.06.13 Roman Slyvka, Liubov Slyvka, Yaroslava Atamaniuk Transformations of the cultural landscape of Donbas during the armed conflict 2015–2017 The main objective of the article – to show the different trajectories of the cultural land- scape in controlled and uncontrolled parts of the war-torn Donbas. The cultural landscape of Ukraine significantly changed during the twentieth century. The main factors of these transformations were ideological, military and geopolitical. The sub-ordinate position of Ukraine within the USSR allowed communist leaders to enforce sovietisation of the cultural landscape. This policy was especially noticeable in the great industrial region of Donbas. Achievements of independence by Ukraine and democratization of country' public life have led to transformation/conservation of the cultural landscape, which corresponded with political culture of individual regions. The war in the Donbas has become a catalyst for the processes of creating different types of cultural landscape on the different sides of the contact line. The policy of creating a cultural landscape has become an instrument of political socialization and mobilization of the population. This process is not complete, and can contribute to the crystallization of new subregional identities on different parts of contemporary Donbas. Keywords: Donbas, cultural landscape, post-soviet city, military conflict, decomunisa- tion, renaming, monument, policy of memory. 1. Introduction The conflict in Donbas deepened those political divisions that began to be observed in Ukrainian society since the 1990s. There are a number of visible elements of Donbas' cultural landscape, which indicates the drastic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 111/2021 15 May 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 111/2021 15 May 20211 Summary In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded 197 ceasefire violations, including 92 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 208 ceasefire violations in the region. In Luhansk region, the Mission recorded 74 ceasefire violations, including 49 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 332 ceasefire violations in the region. The SMM saw fresh damage to and near four houses (of which three inhabited) near Marinka, Donetsk region. Small-arms fire was assessed as directed at an SMM mid-range unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) near Chermalyk. The SMM continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. Its UAVs spotted people inside the disengagement area near Petrivske. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at four entry-exit checkpoints and the corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Horlivka, Donetsk region and at a border crossing point near non-government-controlled Voznesenivka (formerly Chervonopartyzansk), Luhansk region. Its UAVs again experienced multiple instances of GPS signal interference.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 14 May 2021. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table.
    [Show full text]
  • Kramatorsk, Ukraine 28 August 2019
    General Coordination Meeting – Kramatorsk, Ukraine 28 August 2019 Discussion Action points/Decisions OVERVIEW OF HUMANITARIAN SITUATION United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs provided the following update: • OCHA CMCoord informed about latest updates regarding security situation in the area. • RC/HC Ms. Osnat Lubrani held a visit to Donetsk and Luhansk oblast. She met with UN agencies and NGOs to discuss recent developments in humanitarian and HDN. Ms Lubrani also visited the village of Opytne in order to assess the humanitarian situation there and see humanitarian activities implemented by partners. • In commemoration of the World Humanitarian Day (WHD), UNOCHA, together with international and national organizations based in Kramatorsk and in close collaboration with the local authorities of Donetska oblast and the city of Kramatorsk, organized an open space event. The main objective of the event was to raise awareness about the humanitarian situation in eastern Ukraine and the response efforts of the international organizations through displaying different activities and engaging with the public in an interactive way. Event started in time and gathered 20 partners. Some 1000-2000 guests attended the place. RC/HC and Governor delivered their speeches and had a tour around the side with all the partners presenting themselves to RC/HC and Governor. Governor was very active in getting acquainted with partners and asked many questions. Partner were able to address some concerns during the discussion. Later, after short informal discussion, RC/HC introduced to the Governor her special advisor on HDN. After the departure of the Governor, RC/HC had few short informal discussions with partners and OSCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • THEMATIC REPORT SMM Facilitation and Monitoring of Infrastructure
    - 1 - THEMATIC REPORT SMM facilitation and monitoring of infrastructure repair in eastern Ukraine January 2017 – August 2018 December 2018 15362/18mf Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2018 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm Table of Contents Summary: Infrastructure in context ...................................................................................................... - 1 - Political framework for facilitation of infrastructure repair ............................................................... - 2 - Working Group on Security Issues (WGSI) .................................................................................... - 2 - Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) ..................................................................... - 3 - SMM support for infrastructure maintenance and repair in eastern Ukraine ..................................... - 3 - Overall SMM operational contributions ........................................................................................ - 3 - Water supply in Donetsk region ..................................................................................................... - 5 - Electricity supply
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 239/2020 7 October 20201 Summary
    - 1 - Daily Report 239/2020 7 October 20201 Summary The SMM recorded three ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and one in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded nine ceasefire violations in Donetsk region and five in Luhansk region. A woman and a boy were injured by the explosion of a device near Zolote- 5/Mykhailivka, Luhansk region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske. During night hours, an SMM long-range unmanned aerial vehicle spotted a person inside the disengagement area near Zolote. The SMM saw four weapons in violation of withdrawal lines in a non-government- controlled area of Luhansk region. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localised ceasefires to enable repairs to and the operation of critical civilian infrastructure. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians amid the COVID-19 pandemic, including at an entry-exit checkpoint and the corresponding checkpoint of the armed formations in Luhansk region. The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted.* Ceasefire violations 2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations 3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 6 October 2020. All times are in Eastern European Summer Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational. 3 Including explosions 4 Including from unidentified weapons - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded three ceasefire violations – all undetermined explosions in areas north-north-west of Staropetrivske (non-government-controlled, 35km north-east of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Ukraine Checkpoint Monitoring Report
    EASTERN UKRAINE CHECKPOINT MONITORING REPORT January – March 2019 vpl.com.ua 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 METHODOLOGY 2 HIGHLIGHTS 3 1 DEMOGRAPHICS OF RESPONDENTS 4 2 RESIDENCE, DISPLACEMENT, AND RETURNS 5 FREQUENCY AND DURATION 3 6 OF CROSSING 4 REASONS FOR CROSSING 7 5 DESTINATION OF THE TRIP 8 CONCERNS WHILE CROSSING THE LINE OF 6 10 CONTACT This publication has been produced with the assistance of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of «Right to Protection» and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of UNHCR. Advocacy, Protection, and Legal Assistance to IDPs 2 INTRODUCTION This report provides the results of the survey conducted by the Charitable Foundation «The Right to Protection» (R2P) with the support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) at the five entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to the non-government-controlled area (NGCA) in the first quarter of 2019. The data were collected during regular visits to each of the five EECPs (120 visits in three months). More statistical data are available on the Eastern Ukraine Checkpoint Monitoring Online Dashboard – https://goo.gl/Ab1qXs. Stanytsia Luhanska EECP METHODOLOGY The survey has been administered on It should be noted that the survey results a person refused to participate, monitors a regular basis since June 2017. The should not be directly extrapolated onto proceeded to survey the next fourth survey is part of the monitoring of the entire population traveling through person in line. People traveling both to violations of rights of the conflict-affected the checkpoints, but it helps identify and from the GCA took part in the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas in Flames
    GUIDE TO THE CONFLICT ZONE This publication is the result of work of a group of authors of various competencies: investigative journalism, politology, geography, and history. Written as a kind of vade mecum, this guidebook will familiarize the reader with the precursors, problems, terminology, and characteristics of the war in the Donbas. The book is targeted at experts, journalists, and representatives of international missions working in Ukraine. It will also interest a wide range of readers trying to understand and develop their own opinion on the situation in the east of Ukraine. The electronic version of this publication can be downloaded from https://prometheus.ngo/donbas-v-ogni Donbas In Flames УДК 908(477.61/.62-074)”2014/…”(036=111) Guide to the conflict zone ББК 26.89(4Укр55) Lviv, 2017 Д67 Editor: Alina Maiorova Authors: Mykola Balaban, Olga Volyanyuk, Christina Dobrovolska, Bohdan Balaban, Maksym Maiorov English translation: Artem Velychko, Christina Dobrovolska, Svitlana Kemblowski, Anna Shargorodskaya, Andrii Gryganskyi, Max Alginin Design: Lukyan Turetsky Activity supported by the Security Environment Canada Fund for Local Initiatives Research Center © 2017 “Prometheus” NGO Activité réalisée avec l’appui du Fonds canadien d'initiatives locales Content Foreword. When the truth is the best weapon 5 Chapter 1. Donbas - The panoramic picture 7 Donbas on the Map of Ukraine 7 As Seen by Analysts and Journalists 10 Donbas (Un)Known to the World 14 Chapter 2. Could the War be Avoided? 17 Ukrainian land 17 Rust Belt 20 Similar and different 22 Voting Rights 25 Unsolicited patronage 26 Chapter 3. Chronicles of War 31 End of February 2014 31 March 2014 32 April 2014 33 May 2014 36 June 2014 38 July 2014 39 August 2014 41 Beginning of September 2014 42 September 2014 - February 2015 42 From February 2015 to this day 44 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerabilities
    UKRAINE Capacity & Vulnerability Assessment Toretsk Municipality, Government Controlled Area November-December 2018 Introduction Methodology Armed conflict between the forces of the significantly. The assessment began with a secondary The populations of interest in this study are: Government of Ukraine (GoU) and opposition data review in order to identify the main internally displaced persons (IDPs), non- This Capacity and Vulnerability Assessment groups in the territory of Donbas will enter its service providers in the raion. REACH used displaced populations and service providers (CVA) monitors and analyses the challenges sixth year in 2019. The conflict is concentrated geospatial data from the main mapping in Toretsk Municipality. The research used identified during the Area-Based Assessment around the contact line separating the services in Ukraine to map the settlements of a stratified random sample with four strata (ABA) of July 20173. The key issues identified government controlled area (GCA) from the assessed area and identify the locations (Table 1). by the ABA of Toretsk were distance, cost of non-government controlled area (NGCA) of of service providers and catchement areas of transport and security risks while accessing The HH survey component of primary Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.1 these providers. services. Using a network approach, this study data collection included 769 in-person HH The Municipality of Toretsk, officially known as also maps the basic service delivery capacities Primary data collection was conducted from interviews across settlements of Toretsk the Toretsk City Council2, is located along the at the facility level and access to services at 30th Nov – 14th Dec 2018, and included key Municipality located in the GCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Report
    THEMATIC REPORT CIVILIAN CASUALTIES IN THE CONFLICT-AFFECTED REGIONS OF EASTERN UKRAINE 1 January 2017-15 September 2020 November 2020 1 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompa- nied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Chapter 1: Introduction 6 Chapter 2: Methodology 7 Impediments to the Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine’s (SMM) corroboration of civilian casualties 7 Chapter 3: Summary of findings 8 Casualties by type of incident 9 Casualties by region 10 Civilian casualties by sex and age 12 Chapter 4: Impact of ceasefire violations on the lives of civilians 15 Conduct of hostilities and escalations in violence 17 Chapter 5: Casualties due to mines, unexploded ordnance (UXO) and other explosive objects 21 Mishandling or dismantling of UXO, ammunition and other explosive objects 23 Rivers and riverbanks 23 Areas near government-controlled entry-exit checkpoints and the corresponding 24 checkpoints of the armed formations Fields and agricultural land 25 Demining activities facilitated and monitored by the SMM 25 Conclusion 27 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2017, the Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM) published a thematic report on civilian casualties that occurred in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine in 2016. The current report examines the period from 1 January 2017 to 15 September 2020.
    [Show full text]