Desk-Based Assessment of Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment Works, Nottinghamshire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Desk-Based Assessment of Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment Works, Nottinghamshire Archaeological Research & Consultancy at the University of Sheffield Graduate School of Archaeology West Court, 2 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT Phone 0114 2225106 Fax 0114 2797158 Report 1169.1(1) Desk-based Assessment of Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment Works, Nottinghamshire April 2008 By Sean Bell Prepared for: Severn Trent Water Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment Works, Nottinghamshire National Grid Reference: SK 637 421 (centred) Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Report 1169.1(1) © ARCUS 2008 Checked by: Passed for submission to client: Date: Date: Sean Bell Glyn Davies ARCUS Project Archaeologist ARCUS Senior Project Manager Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment, Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment, Stoke Lane, Nottingham ARCUS 1169.1(1) – April 2008 1 OASIS SUMMARY FORM PROJECT DETAILS OASIS identifier arcus2-38634 Project title Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment, Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment, Stoke Lane, Nottingham. Short description of the ARCUS was commissioned by Severn Trent Water to undertake a desk-based assessment of project land at Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment Works, Nottingham. The most significant archaeological site within the proposal area is an undated double linear feature with an associated circular enclosure, that was recorded within the site’s northernmost field on a 1975 aerial photograph. The proposal area lies outside the historic core of the village and its medieval field system and is unlikely to contain significant archaeological remains dating from this or later periods. Based on the disturbance associated with the sewage works, along with the low archaeological potential in the 2 fields under consideration, it is proposed that an archaeological watching brief is undertaken during any removal of the current topsoil or sewage waste in these fields. During the watching brief, particular attention should be paid to the northern field in which cropmarks were visible on the 1975 aerial photograph. Project dates April 2008 Previous/future work None/not known. Monument type and period None. Significant finds None. (artefact type and period) PROJECT LOCATION County/Parish Nottinghamshire/Stoke Bardolph Site address Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment Works, Stoke Lane, Stoke Bardolph, Nottinghamshire. Site co-ordinates SK 637 421 (centred). Site area Height OD PROJECT CREATORS Organisation Severn Trent Water Project brief originator Severn Trent Water Project design originator N/a Project manager Glyn Davies Site Supervisor Sean Bell Sponsor or funding body Severn Trent Water PROJECT ARCHIVES Archive Type Location/Accession no. Content (e.g. pottery, metalwork, etc) Physical N/a N/a Paper Nottinghamshire SMR Report (text, illustrations, plates) Digital Nottinghamshire SMR Report (pdf copy) BIBLIOGRAPHY Title Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment, Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment, Stoke Lane, Nottingham Report no 1169.1(1) Author Sean Bell Date April 2008 Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment, Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment, Stoke Lane, Nottingham ARCUS 1169.1(1) – April 2008 2 CONTENTS OASIS SUMMARY FORM .................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND PLATES ............................................................................ 4 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY........................................................................................... 5 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 6 2 AIMS AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 6 2.1 Aims.......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Data Collection......................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Site Visit ................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Geotechnical Data.................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Planning Framework................................................................................................ 6 3 SITE LOCATION AND LAND USE ...............................................................................7 4 HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SUMMARY ....................................................7 4.1 Prehistoric ............................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Roman ...................................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Medieval ................................................................................................................... 8 4.4 Post-medieval........................................................................................................... 9 4.5 Modern..................................................................................................................... 9 5 CURRENT CONDITION OF THE SITE AND EXISTING FEATURES............................ 10 6 ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION AND POTENTIAL ............................................11 7 RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................11 8 COPYRIGHT............................................................................................................. 12 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES............................................................................... 12 10 GAZETTEER OF KNOWN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ............................................... 14 11 ILLUSTRATIONS AND PLATES................................................................................. 15 Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment, Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment, Stoke Lane, Nottingham ARCUS 1169.1(1) – April 2008 3 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND PLATES Illustrations 1 Site location 2 Location of known archaeological sites and find spots 3 1796 Enclosure Award map 4 1873 Map of Stoke Bardolph 5 1928 Drainage plan and proposed sewage treatment works Plates 1 General view of Stoke Farm, looking east. 2 View along water channel forming north-west boundary of east field, looking southwest. 3 View of tree plantation in north-east corner of east field, showing young trees and surrounding vegetation, looking south-east. 4 View along north-west boundary of east field, looking south-west, showing edge of ploughed surface. 5 General view across east field, looking north-west, showing ploughed surface. 6 View of south-east corner of north field, looking south, showing scrub grassland with sewage treatment works beyond. 7 View across north field, looking south-west towards by-pass road, showing recently deposited material and standing water. 8 View across north field looking east towards hills beyond River Trent, showing recently deposited material, machine tracks and standing water. 9 View of former east end of north field, looking south, showing ploughed surface examined to characterise deposits within the proposal area to north of the treatment works. 10 View, looking west, along access road from Stoke Farm. 11 View along road at north-east boundary of east field, looking north. 12 View along road running to north of north field, looking south-east. Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment, Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment, Stoke Lane, Nottingham ARCUS 1169.1(1) – April 2008 4 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ARCUS was commissioned by Severn Trent Water to undertake a desk-based assessment of land at Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment Works, Nottingham (centred on SK 637 421). The assessment was required in relation to a planned extension of the sewage works and included a site visit, along with documentary and cartographic research. The site lies within the Trent Valley, which was a focus for human activity during the prehistoric and Roman periods. Trent Valley river gravels have yielded archaeological evidence of fauna, flora and human occupation. However, these deposits and features are often located at considerable depth and the visibility of potential sub-surface archaeology within the site may have been reduced by the regular spreading of waste materials from the sewage farm and the later sewage treatment works across the agricultural areas of Stoke Farm. The most significant archaeological feature within the proposal area, is an undated double linear feature with an associated circular enclosure, that was recorded within the site’s northernmost field on a 1975 aerial photograph. The proposal area lies outside the historic core of Stoke Bardolph village and its medieval field system and is unlikely to contain significant archaeological remains dating from the medieval period or later. No evidence for any such deposits or structures was identified during the walkover survey. Based on the disturbance associated with the sewage works, resulting in the low archaeological potential of the 2 fields under consideration, it is proposed that an archaeological watching brief should be undertaken during any removal of the current topsoil or sewage waste in these fields. During the watching brief, particular attention should be paid to the northern field in which cropmarks were visible on the 1975 aerial photograph. Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment, Stoke Bardolph Sewage Treatment, Stoke Lane, Nottingham ARCUS 1169.1(1) – April 2008 5 1 INTRODUCTION This document presents the results of an archaeological
Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nottinghamshire County Council (Magenta Way, Stoke Bardolph)(Prohibition of Waiting and No Stopping on Entrance Clearway) Traffic Regulation Order 2021 (7243)
    The Nottinghamshire County Council (Magenta Way, Stoke Bardolph)(Prohibition of Waiting and No Stopping on Entrance Clearway) Traffic Regulation Order 2021 (7243) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Nottinghamshire County Council proposes to make an Order under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, Traffic Management Act 2004, as amended, and The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (County of Nottinghamshire) Designation Order 2008 (SI 2008 No. 1086), as amended, the effects of which will be to roads in Stoke Bardolph in the Borough of Gedling:- 1. Proposed No waiting at any time restrictions (double yellow lines):- (i) MAGENTA WAY (the north-east side) from a point 14 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) (as measure along the centre line) in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 158 metres. (ii) MAGENTA WAY (the south-west side) from a point 14 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) (as measure along the centre line) in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 66 metres. (iii) from a point 130 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) in a south- easterly and then an easterly direction for a distance of 46 metres. 2. Proposed No Stopping on Entrance Clearway on Mon – Fri between 8am and 4.30pm:- (i) MAGENTA WAY (the south-west side) from a point 104 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) in a south- easterly direction for a distance of 26 metres. 3. Other Restrictions – Bus stop Clearway – No Stopping, except buses, at all times (i) MAGENTA WAY (the south-west side) from a point 80 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) in a south- easterly direction for a distance of 25 metres Relevant documents may be inspected at the locations below or by visiting the County Councils website – consult.nottinghamshire.gov.uk (a) The Nottinghamshire County Council, County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham NG2 7QP.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Declaration Register
    Landowner Declaration Register This is maintained under Section 31A of the Highways Act 1980 and Section 15B(1) of the Commons Act 2006. It comprises: Landowner deposit under S.15A(1) of the Commons Act 2006 By depositing a statement, landowners can prevent their land being registered as a Town or Village Green, provided they make the deposit before there has been 20 years recreational use of the land as of right. A new statement must be deposited within 20 years. Landowner deposit under S.31(6) of the Highways Act 1980 Highway statements and highway declarations allow landowners to prevent their land being recorded as a highway on the definitive map on the basis of presumed dedication (usually 20 years uninterrupted use). A highway statement or declaration must be followed by a further declaration within 20 years (or 10 years if lodged prior to 1 October 2013). Last Updated: September 2015 Ref Parish Landowner Details of land Highways Act 1980 CA1 Documents No. Section 31(6) 6 Date of Expiry date initial deposit A1 Alverton M P Langley The Belvedere, Alverton 17/07/2008 17/07/2018 A2 Annesley Multi owners Annesley Estate 30/03/1998 30/03/2004 expired A3 Annesley Notts Wildlife Trust Annesley Woodhouse Quarry 11/07/1997 13/01/2013 expired A4 Annesley Taylor Wimpey UK Little Oak Plantation 11/04/2012 11/04/2022 Ltd A5 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Lodge Farm, off Georgia Avenue 05/01/2009 05/01/2019 A6 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Land off Kenneth Road 05/01/2009 05/01/2019 A7 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Land off Calverton Road 05/11/2008 05/11/2018
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 71 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton, GCB.KBE. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin.QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albemarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholjn. Sir Andrew Wheatley,CBE. Mr F B Young, CBE. To the Rt Hon Roy Jenkins, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED EI£CTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FUR THE BOROUGH OF GEDLING IN THE COUNT*/ OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the borough of Gedling in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of and Schedule 9 to the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough* 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60 (l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 18 January 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Gedling Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to the Nottinghamshire County Council, Parish Councils in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties* Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the Local Government press and to the local radio broadcasting station* Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands
    Liberal Democrat submission for BCE 3rd consultation East Midlands Submission to the Boundary Commission for England third period of consultation: East Midlands Summary There is a factual error in the Commission’s report concerning the Liberal Democrat counter-proposals in the Leicestershire / Northamptonshire / Nottinghamshire / Rutland sub-region. We would, therefore, ask the Commission to reconsider the scheme we put forward. We welcome the change the Commission has made to its proposal for Mansfield. We welcome the fact that the Commission has kept to its original proposals in Lincolnshire, much of Derbyshire and Derby, and in Northampton. We consider that the changes that the Commission has made to four constituencies in Derbyshire, affecting the disposition of three wards, are finely balanced judgement calls with which we are content to accept the Commission’s view. The change that the Commission has made to the Kettering and Wellingborough constituencies would not have needed to be considered if it had agreed to our proposal for an unchanged Wellingborough seat. The Commission’s proposal to move the Burton Joyce and Stoke Bardolph ward into its proposed Sherwood constituency means that it is now proposing three Nottinghamshire constituencies (Bassetlaw, Broxtowe, Sherwood) which contain a ward which is inaccessible from the rest of the seat. We are not in agreement with the Commission’s failure to comply with the spirit of the legislation or the letter of its own guidelines in respect of these three proposed constituencies. We are not in agreement with the Commission’s failure to respect the boundaries of the City of Nottingham to the extent of proposing three constituencies that cross the Unitary Authority boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Latest Ng5 Arnold Magazine to Your Computer
    WIN Panto tickets Brew Experience Day 4 2 3 x £100 Go Ape vouchers ng5 £20 one4all voucher See inside for details! October/November 2021 MOT & SERVICE CENTRE · MOTORCYCLES · MOTORHOMES · CARS · CLASS 7’S · BRAKES · BATTERIES · AIR CON · TIMING BELTS · ALL REPAIRS WAITING APPOINTMENTS • AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST FURLONG STREET GARAGE UNIT 5, DALESIDE PARK, PARK ROAD EAST, CALVERTON, NG14 6LL 01159 204 919 www.fsg.beezer.com Delivered FREE to 17,000 homes and businesses. Site clearance • Patios • Slabbing Driveways • Block Paving Landscaping • Fencing Hedges trimmed or removed Pressure washing of patios, drive- ways & wooden decking also re-sanding & re-sealing if required Plus Open Sack & Loose Housecoal PICK UP A LOYALTY CARD TODAY TO START COLLECTING FOR FREE FUEL! SCAN THIS CODE TO DOWNLOAD OUR APP FOR MOBILES & TABLETS WE ARE NOW FULLY OPEN AND MADE IN GREAT BRITAIN SALE NOW ON WELCOME TO ARNOLD SOFAS & BEDS CENTRE PURCHASING FROM ARNOLD SOFA’S & BED CENTRE COULDN’T BE EASIER. RELAX IN BEAUTIFUL BRITISH MADE FURNITURE HUGE RANGE ON DISPLAY 55 HIGH ST, ARNOLD, NOTTINGHAM NG5 7DG FREE PARKING 0115 953 1001 OPPOSITE AW LYMNS [email protected] ARNOLD www.arnoldsofasandbeds.co.uk SOFAS & BEDS CENTRE Opening Times 9.00am till 3.00pm Monday to Saturday Quality made-to-measure fitted wardrobes - 100’s of designs - Free design & quote - 10 year guarantee - Family business over 20 years - We only use our own fitters - Honest pricing policy - All made in-house - Fit within 3 weeks of order - Installation within 1 day Book your free
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum to the Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham
    Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City Sustainability Appraisal Report of the Aligned Core Strategies Publication Version Addendum May 2013 This page is intentionally blank Sustainability Appraisal Report on Publication Version Document (June 2012) Addendum February 2013 Introduction 1. This report is an addendum to the Greater Nottingham (Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City) Sustainability Appraisal Publication Version June 2012 of the Aligned Core Strategies (ACS). 2. The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004) requires Local Planning Authorities to carry out a Sustainability Appraisal of the proposals in development plan documents and to prepare a report of the findings of that appraisal. Through the SA process, the local planning authority must assess the social, economic and environmental impacts arising from the proposals within the development plan document. The Core Strategies are development plan documents and therefore have been subject to SA at each of the key stages in their preparation. 3. The Councils published a SA Report alongside the Core Strategies in June 2012. 4. The aim of this stage of the Sustainability Appraisal (SA) process is to determine whether there are likely to be any significant sustainability effects arising from the proposed amendments to the Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies Publication Version June 2012 (hereafter referred to as the Core Strategies). 5. This report therefore presents the results of the appraisal of the proposed changes to the Core Strategies, including the full appraisal of a new policy (Policy A: Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development). The report also provides a summary of comments received at the publication stage of the ACS to the SA and officer responses to those comments, plus commentary on updates to baseline data and characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of POLL Election of County Councillors
    NOTICE OF POLL Gedling Borough Council Election of County Councillors for Arnold North Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of County Councillors for Arnold North will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of County Councillors to be elected is two. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors ALLAN 9 Church Street, Labour Party Henry T Wheeler (+) Wendy A Payne (++) Pauline Annette Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 8FD BESTWICK (Address in Gedling Conservative Party Geoffrey A Walker (+) Toni P Le Gallez (++) Stuart James Borough) Candidate DOYLE 2 Grove Close, Conservative Party Geoffrey A Walker (+) Nicholas W Crosby Kevin Backhouse Burton Joyce, Candidate (++) Nottingham, NG14 5FE JONES 24 Monsell Drive, Liberal Democrat Blerina Kellezi (+) Kevin G Parr (++) Tadeusz Redhill, Nottingham, NG5 8LY KEY 22 Castleton Avenue, Independent Phillip Key (+) Terry Key (++) Paul Richard Arnold, Nottinghamshire, NG5 6NJ NORRIS 19 Meeks Road, Green Party John J Stuart (+) Margret S Vince (++) Jim Arnold, NG5 8AQ PAYNE 2B The Mount, Labour Party Henry T Wheeler (+) Wendy A Payne (++) Michael Richard Redhill, Nottingham, NG5 8LU STANSFIELD 48A Arnot Hill Road, Liberal Democrat Tadeusz E Z Jones (+) Blerina Kellezi (++) Jason Martin Arnold, Nottinghamshire, NG5 6LL STICKLAND (Address in Gedling Independent Adrian P Woods (+) Verdi I Stickland (++) Don Borough) Dated Tuesday 27 April 2021 Mike Hill Deputy Returning Officer Printed and published by the Deputy Returning Officer, Civic Centre, Arnot Hill Park, Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 6LU 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Broxtowe Borough Gedling Borough Nottingham City Greater Nottingham Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan
    Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough Gedling Borough Nottingham City Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan Adopted September 2014 Contact Details: Broxtowe Borough Council Foster Avenue Beeston Nottingham NG9 1AB Tel: 0115 9177777 [email protected] www.broxtowe.gov.uk/corestrategy Gedling Borough Council Civic Centre Arnot Hill Park Arnold Nottingham NG5 6LU Tel: 0115 901 3757 [email protected] www.gedling.gov.uk/gedlingcorestrategy Nottingham City Council LHBOX52 Planning Policy Team Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG Tel: 0115 876 3973 [email protected] www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/corestrategy General queries about the process can also be made to: Greater Nottingham Growth Point Team Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG Tel 0115 876 2561 [email protected] www.gngrowthpoint.com Alternative Formats All documentation can be made available in alternative formats or languages on request. Contents Working in Partnership to Plan for Greater Nottingham 1 1.1 Working in Partnership to Plan for Greater Nottingham 1 1.2 Why the Councils are Working Together 6 1.3 The Local Plan (formerly Local Development Framework) 6 1.4 Sustainability Appraisal 9 1.5 Habitats Regulations Assessment 10 1.6 Equality Impact Assessment 11 The Future of Broxtowe, Gedling and Nottingham City in the Context of Greater Nottingham 13 2.1 Key Influences on the Future of the Plan Area 13 2.2 The Character of the Plan Area 13 2.3 Spatial Vision 18 2.4 Spatial Objectives 20 2.5 Links to Sustainable Community
    [Show full text]
  • Gedling Heritage Strategy
    Gedling Borough Heritage Strategy MAY 2018 Contents Page Contents 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Executive Summary 4 3 Gedling Borough’s Heritage – an overview 6 4 Benefits and Challenges 13 5 Strategic Direction and Themes of Work 18 6 Next Steps and Future Agenda 23 Appendix A Local and Natural History Groups in Gedling Borough and their 25 websites This consultation document has been prepared by consultant Stephen Bray. 1 1. Introduction The Borough of Gedling is an amalgamation of a number of villages and towns, created by the 1974 reorganisation of local government. Stretching from the River Trent in the south east to Sherwood Forest in the north west, its settlements include once separate communities that have become part of the Greater Nottingham conurbation as well as ten rural parishes incorporating country villages which have retained their rural charm. The Borough boasts heritage of local, regional, national and international significance. Newstead Abbey, home of Lord Byron, is perhaps the Borough’s most famous landmark. Other less well known but equally important assets include Papplewick Pumping Station and Bestwood Winding Engine. The Borough is the birthplace of William Lee, inventor of the mechanised stocking frame in Calverton in 1589; of Richard Parkes Bonington, the renowned 19th century landscape artist; and of Thomas Hawkesley, who designed and built Britain's first high pressure constant supply water system, preventing the deaths of countless millions of people around the world. Evidence suggests human occupation of what is now Arnold began in the late Bronze Age, while notable remnants of an Iron Age fort have been discovered near Woodborough at Foxwood, now one of the Borough's nine Scheduled Ancient Monuments.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report
    Authority Monitoring Report April 2014 – March 2015 January 2016 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................. 3 2. Gedling Borough Replacement Local Plan ......................................... 4 3. Local Plan Milestones .................................................................... 5 Local Development Scheme ............................................................................. 5 Statement of Consultation ................................................................................. 5 Development Plan Documents ......................................................................... 5 Supplementary Planning Documents ............................................................... 7 4. Neighbourhood Planning ................................................................ 8 Neighbourhood Development Plan .................................................................. 8 Neighbourhood Development Orders ............................................................. 8 5. Community Infrastructure Levy ....................................................... 9 6. Duty to Cooperate ......................................................................... 11 Local Planning Authorities .............................................................................. 11 Environmental Agency ................................................................................... 12 Natural England ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stoke Bardolph, Anaerobic Digestion Plant Transport Statement
    Wardell Armstrong (Severn Trent) Stoke Bardolph, Anaerobic Digestion Plant January 2016 Transport Statement odetransport.co.uk m Stoke Bardolph, AnaeroBic Digestion Plant Transport Statement Project No: J322526 Cornwall Buildings 45 Newhall Street Birmingham B3 3QR ( 0121 213 4880 * [email protected] modetransport.co.uk Prepared by: Approved By: ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Adrian Forte Ben Fairgrieve Status: Draft Issue no: 1 Date: 28 January 2016 160112 j322526 ts001_draft.docx (C) Copyright mode transport limited. All rights reserved. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing mode transport limited, no other party may copy, reproduce, distribute, make use of, or rely on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by mode transport limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in this report are on the basis of mode transport limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no explicit warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to mode transport limited has been made Stoke Bardolph, Anaerobic Digestion Plant Transport Statement Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Background 2 1.2 Purpose of Report 2 1.3 Report Format 2 2 Existing
    [Show full text]