DOCSLIB.ORG

Targhee Pass EA Scoping Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Targhee Pass EA Scoping Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCOPING REPORT FOR US 20 JUNCTION OF STATE HIGHWAY 87 TO THE MONTANA STATE LINE TARGHEE PASS PROJECT 14054 DECEMBER 2017 IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT RIGBY, IDAHO Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Scoping Process and Public Involvement .......................................................................................... 1 2.1 Internal Scoping ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.2 External scoping ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.3 Transcription of Comments for Inclusion in the Scoping Report .................................................. 4 3.0 Issues Derived from Scoping ............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Issues Related to Project Purpose and Need ................................................................................ 5 3.2 Issues Related to Project Alternatives .......................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Inclusion of Design Elements for Wildlife-Vehicle Collision (WVC) Reduction and Wildlife Movement ............................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2.2 Speed Limit ............................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.3 Turning Traffic Movements ................................................................................................... 9 3.2.4 Improved Signage ............................................................................................................... 10 3.2.5 Frontage Road ..................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.6 Shoulders and Rumble Strips .............................................................................................. 10 3.2.7 Pedestrians and Bicycles ..................................................................................................... 10 3.2.8 Slower Moving Traffic, Passing, and Congestion ................................................................ 11 3.2.9 Freight Traffic ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.10 Recreational Design Features ............................................................................................. 13 3.2.11 Cost, Funding, and Procedural Issues for Alternatives ....................................................... 13 3.3 Issues Related to Public Involvement and the NEPA Process ..................................................... 15 3.4 Issues Related to U.S. 20 Corridor or Segments other than Targhee Pass ................................. 15 3.5 Noise Impact Analysis ................................................................................................................. 16 3.6 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 17 3.7 Wildlife and Fisheries Impact Analysis Issues ............................................................................. 17 3.7.1 Impacts on Wildlife ............................................................................................................. 17 3.7.2 Effectiveness of Wildlife Crossing and Fencing ................................................................... 18 3.8 Threatened and Endangered Species ......................................................................................... 18 3.9 Land Use and Property Acquisition ............................................................................................. 19 3.10 Visual Impact Analysis Issues ...................................................................................................... 19 3.11 Floodplains .................................................................................................................................. 19 3.12 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................... 19 3.13 Aquatic Resources and Water Quality ........................................................................................ 19 3.14 Invasive Species .......................................................................................................................... 20 3.15 Recreation Resources ................................................................................................................. 20 3.16 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................... 20 3.17 Social and Economic Impacts and Environmental Justice .......................................................... 21 3.18 Construction Impacts .................................................................................................................. 21 Appendices Appendix A – ITD Form 0654 Appendix B – Public and Agency Comments December 2016 – June 2017 Appendix C – Public and Agency Comments July-August 2017 Appendix D – Alternatives Development Workshop Comments on Maps, July 27, 2017 Appendix E – Public and Agency Comments August – September, 2017 Appendix F – Public Meeting Presentation Verbal Comments, August 30, 2017 Acronyms The following is a list of acronyms commonly used in this document: EA – Environmental Assessment WVC – wildlife-vehicle collisions ITD – Idaho Transportation Department FHWA – Federal Highway Administration NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act 1.0 Introduction The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) are preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate risks, benefits, opportunities, and costs associated with reconstruction of U.S. 20 in the Targhee Pass area (U.S. 20 between its junction with Idaho State Highway 87 and the Montana state line). As an action using federal funds, the proposed project must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended. Scoping is part of the NEPA process. Scoping is an early and open process to identify issues of concern related to a proposed project. The objectives of scoping are to: Utilize stakeholder input in defining the set of alternatives and impacts that will be examined in detail in the EA. Give interested parties an opportunity to comment on the scope of the study and raise issues or concerns that should be addressed. Promote an efficient process by coordinating with resource agencies with jurisdiction or special expertise related to the project and project location. Reduce overall processing time by identifying relevant issues to study in the EA upfront and provide opportunity for early involvement to minimize the possibility that new issues will be raised later in the process. This report documents the scoping and alternatives development process carried out by the study team. Outreach activities conducted with resources agencies, the general public, and a forum of stakeholder representatives are described in the following pages. In addition to the summary of results, this report includes appendices containing all written public and agency comments received during the scoping and alternatives development phases of the EA process. 2.0 Scoping Process and Public Involvement 2.1 Internal Scoping ITD utilizes Form 0654 at the start of the NEPA process to identify known issues that will be analyzed in the environmental document. ITD’s assessment also includes consideration of the appropriate Class of Action; ITD confirmed its decision to continue to prepare an EA. The completed form for the Targhee Pass project is included in Appendix A. 2.2 External scoping ITD employed a suite of public involvement methods to obtain public input regarding issues to be evaluated in the EA. Throughout phases of external scoping and alternatives development, ITD accepted comments by email, postal mail, and telephone. Hand-written comments were also accepted at public meetings. All communications with the public, organizations, and resource agencies are archived in a database that will be retained in ITD’s project record. 1 2.2.1 Situational Assessment: October 2017 At the request of the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD), The Langdon Group conducted a situational assessment for ITD’s Targhee Pass Environmental Assessment to inform the public outreach strategy for this study. Assessment conversations occurred over the phone and in-person. Conversations were conducted informally allowing the stakeholders to drive the direction and discuss the issues that were most important to them. Interviews were not conducted using a specific set of questions asked of all stakeholders; therefore, the resulting summary does not provide quantifiable data, instead this report is intended to provide a window into the opinions, issues, and concerns that exist among a diverse sub-set of stakeholders. Interviews took place between October and November 2016. Assessment participants were identified by ITD and The Langdon Group. They included: Federal Agencies U.S. Forest Service
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix E: Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Study Process Table of Contents
    Appendix E: Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Study Process Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Relevant Laws, Regulations, and Policy ........................................................................................................ 2 Eligibility Process ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Step 1: Identify all free-flowing named streams ....................................................................................... 3 Step 2: Identify the region of comparison for each resource ................................................................... 4 Step 3: Develop evaluation criteria to identify ORVs ............................................................................... 6 Step 4: Evaluate named streams and determine if they are free-flowing and possess ORVs .................. 9 Step 5: Classification of eligible streams ................................................................................................... 9 Step 6: Develop management direction to be included in the proposed action .................................... 12 Public Feedback on Wild and Scenic River Eligibility .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Action–Revised Forest Plan, Custer Gallatin National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Proposed Action–Revised Forest Plan, Custer Gallatin National Forest Forest Service January 2018 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (for example, Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Alliance Draft EIS Comments (2019)
    June 4, 2019 Virginia Kelly Custer Gallatin National Forest P.O. Box 130, (10 E Babcock) Bozeman, MT 59771 Submitted online at https://cara.ecosystem-management.org/Public/CommentInput?project=50185 Re: Comments on the Custer Gallatin National Forest draft EIS Dear Virginia and Forest Planning Team: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Custer Gallatin forest plan revision. These comments are submitted on behalf of Outdoor Alliance and Outdoor Alliance Montana, a coalition of national and Montana-based advocacy organizations that includes Southwest Montana Climbers Coalition, Montana Backcountry Alliance, Southwest Montana Mountain Bike Association, Western Montana Climbers Coalition, Mountain Bike Missoula, Winter Wildlands Alliance, International Mountain Bicycling Association, American Whitewater, and the American Alpine Club. Our members visit the Custer Gallatin National Forest (CGNF) to hike, mountain bike, fat-tire bike, paddle, climb, backcountry ski, cross- country ski, and snowshoe. Outdoor Alliance is a coalition of ten member-based organizations representing the human powered outdoor recreation community. The coalition includes Access Fund, American Canoe Association, American Whitewater, International Mountain Bicycling Association, Winter Wildlands Alliance, The Mountaineers, the American Alpine Club, the Mazamas, Colorado Mountain Club, and Surfrider Foundation and represents the interests of the millions of Americans who climb, paddle, mountain bike, backcountry
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Commenting on the Custer Gallatin National Forest Plan Revision
    A Guide to Commenting on the Custer Gallatin National Forest Plan Revision From the soaring peaks in the west to the badlands in the east, the Custer Gallatin National Forest (CGNF) encompasses some of the wildest lands in the Lower 48. Here is an overview of many of those places in the Custer Gallatin that we are aiming to protect in the Custer Gallatin Forest plan revision. We’ve included the recommendations that MWA will offer the Forest Service. Please join us in making the same recommendations. The Lionhead (Henrys Lake Mountains) The Lionhead area is one of the few places that was recommended for Wilderness in the 1987 Gallatin Forest plan. Characterized by outstanding natural beauty and sweeping views, this is the only place in the Custer Gallatin where the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail passes through. The Lionhead provides a range of habitat types from sagebrush to lush riparian areas to high alpine basins. It provides habitat for grizzly bears, moose, westslope cutthroat trout, elk, lynx, and sage grouse, providing a critical link between the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and the High Divide. However, mountain biking has become established in this area, threatening its status as recommended wilderness. MWA recommends that the Forest Service maintain the existing 22,800 acres of recommended ​ Wilderness in the Lionhead, reflected in the no-action Alternative A. We would also like to see this area managed to allow foot and stock travel only, so that it may one day be eligible for congressional Wilderness designation. The Gallatin and Madison Ranges Securing lasting protection for the wildlands of the Gallatin Range has been an unwavering goal for MWA since its founding 61 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary and Late Tertiary of Montana: Climate, Glaciation, Stratigraphy, and Vertebrate Fossils
    QUATERNARY AND LATE TERTIARY OF MONTANA: CLIMATE, GLACIATION, STRATIGRAPHY, AND VERTEBRATE FOSSILS Larry N. Smith,1 Christopher L. Hill,2 and Jon Reiten3 1Department of Geological Engineering, Montana Tech, Butte, Montana 2Department of Geosciences and Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Idaho 3Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Billings, Montana 1. INTRODUCTION by incision on timescales of <10 ka to ~2 Ma. Much of the response can be associated with Quaternary cli- The landscape of Montana displays the Quaternary mate changes, whereas tectonic tilting and uplift may record of multiple glaciations in the mountainous areas, be locally signifi cant. incursion of two continental ice sheets from the north and northeast, and stream incision in both the glaciated The landscape of Montana is a result of mountain and unglaciated terrain. Both mountain and continental and continental glaciation, fl uvial incision and sta- glaciers covered about one-third of the State during the bility, and hillslope retreat. The Quaternary geologic last glaciation, between about 21 ka* and 14 ka. Ages of history, deposits, and landforms of Montana were glacial advances into the State during the last glaciation dominated by glaciation in the mountains of western are sparse, but suggest that the continental glacier in and central Montana and across the northern part of the eastern part of the State may have advanced earlier the central and eastern Plains (fi gs. 1, 2). Fundamental and retreated later than in western Montana.* The pre- to the landscape were the valley glaciers and ice caps last glacial Quaternary stratigraphy of the intermontane in the western mountains and Yellowstone, and the valleys is less well known.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Henry's Lake Wilderness Study Area, Fremont County, Idaho
    Mineral Resources of the Henry's Lake Wilderness Study Area, Fremont County, Idaho U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1718-D AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, all & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from WASHINGTON, D.C.-Main Interior Bldg., 2600 corridor, 18th and CSts.,NW.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverines in the Western United States Biological
    Biological Conservation 166 (2013) 276–286 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Developing priorities for metapopulation conservation at the landscape scale: Wolverines in the Western United States ⇑ Robert M. Inman a,b,c, , Brent L. Brock c, Kristine H. Inman a, Shawn S. Sartorius d, Bryan C. Aber a,e,f, Brian Giddings g, Steven L. Cain h, Mark L. Orme f, Jay A. Fredrick i, Bob J. Oakleaf j, Kurt L. Alt g, Eric Odell k, Guillaume Chapron b a Wildlife Conservation Society, 222 East Main Street, Lone Elk Suite 3B, Ennis, MT 59729, USA b Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden c Craighead Environmental Institute, 201 South Wallace Ave., Suite B2D, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA d United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 585 Shepard Way, Helena, MT 59601, USA e Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 3726 Highway 20, Island Park, ID 83429, USA f United States Forest Service, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, ID 83401, USA g Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 1420 East 6th Ave., Helena, MT 59620, USA h National Park Service, Grand Teton National Park, Drawer 170, Moose, WY 83012, USA i United States Forest Service, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, 5 Forest Service Road, Ennis, MT 59729, USA j Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 260 Beauna Vista, Lander, WY 82520, USA k Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 317 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA article info abstract Article history: Wildlife populations are often influenced by multiple political jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverine Ecology and Conservation in the Western United States
    Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae • 2013:4 No. Thesis Doctoral Doctoral Thesis No. 2013:4 This thesis focuses on wolverine ecology and conservation in the western Doctoral Thesis No. 2013:4 United States. The thesis covers the wolverine’s niche, scale of effective Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences management, and conservation priorities; it also examines the institutional system in place for delivering conservation actions for non-game species like wolverines. The analyses presented include home range size, movement Ecology and Conservation in the Western… Wolverine Wolverine Ecology and Conservation in rates, social organization, density, dispersal, reproductive chronology, habitat the Western United States selection, and connectivity. This thesis provides information that can facilitate recovery and management of this candidate endangered species. Robert Michael Inman Robert Michael Inman received his Master and Bachelor of Science degrees from the University of Tennessee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae presents doctoral theses from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). SLU generates knowledge for the sustainable use of biological natural • Robert Michael Inman • Robert Michael resources. Research, education, extension, as well as environmental monitoring and assessment are used to achieve this goal. Online publication of thesis summary: http://epsilon.slu.se/eindex.html ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN 978-91-576-7761-7 Wolverine Ecology and Conservation in the Western United States Robert Michael Inman Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Ecology Uppsala Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2013 Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2013:4 Cover: F121 and two cubs of the year in the Gravelly Range of Montana, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Assessment Report of Ecological, Social and Economic Conditions on the Custer Gallatin National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Draft Assessment Report of Ecological, Social and Economic Conditions on the Custer Gallatin National Forest Forest Service November 2016 Cover Photo: Shots across the Custer Gallatin National Forest Top Left to right - Hiking Beartooth Ranger District, Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness; Lake Plateau, Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness (T. Jones); Cattle graze, Long Pines, Sioux Ranger District; Bottom Left – Moose and Grouse, Gallatin Canyon, Bozeman Ranger District; Elephanthead Mountain, Yellowstone Ranger District, Gallatin Avalanche Center. Note: We make every effort to create documents that are accessible to individuals of all abilities; however, limitations with our word processing programs may prevent some parts of this document from being readable by computer-assisted reading devices. If you need assistance with this document, please contact the Custer Gallatin National Forest at (406) 587-6735. Custer Gallatin National Forest Assessment Report Prepared by: Custer Gallatin National Forest 10 East Babcock Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59771 Responsible Official: Forest Supervisor Mary Erickson Abstract: The assessment report presents and evaluates existing information about relevant ecological, economic and social conditions, trends, risks to sustainability, context within the broader landscape and relationship to the Custer Gallatin forest plan. Assessment Report Team: Brian Cooke, lead writer Judy York, editor Specialists and contributors: Vince Archer Tom Keck Pat Pierson Scott Barndt Virginia Kelly
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategy for Henrys Fork Basin Wetlands
    CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR HENRYS FORK BASIN WETLANDS by Mabel Jankovsky-Jones Conservation Data Center April 1996 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director DEQ Standard Contract # QCO17100 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................i LIST OF FIGURES........................................................ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................ii LIST OF APPENDICES....................................................ii SUMMARY.............................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...................................................iv INTRODUCTION ........................................................1 STUDY AREA ..........................................................2 STATUS OF WETLANDS..................................................3 National Wetlands Inventory...............................................3 Wetland Acreage ......................................................5 Wetland Types........................................................6 Wetland Ownership ....................................................6 Wetland Protection Status ...............................................7 Wetland Condition.......................................................7 Wetland Losses .......................................................8 Functional Shifts.....................................................8 Impairments.......................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Revised Forest Plan for the Custer Gallatin National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Draft Revised Forest Plan Custer Gallatin National Forest Forest Service Northern Region Publication No. R1-19-07 March 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (for example, Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877- 8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT for Canada Lynx Grizzly Bear
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT for Canada Lynx Grizzly Bear Wolverine Otis Gold Corporation Plan of Operations for the Kilgore Project Dubois Ranger District Caribou-Targhee National Forest Clark County, Idaho Prepared by: __/s/_S. Derusseau__________________________ March 15, 2018 Dubois and Ashton-Island Park Districts Wildlife Biologist Date SUMMARY Species Status Determination Canada lynx Threatened May affect, not likely to adversely affect (NLAA) (Lynx canadensis) Grizzly bear Threatened May affect, not likely to adversely affect (NLAA) (Ursus arctos) Wolverine Proposed Not likely to jeopardize the continued existence (Gulo gulo) Threatened (NLJCE) or NLAA INTRODUCTION The purpose of this biological assessment (BA) is to analyze the effects of the proposed action on endangered, threatened, and proposed species. Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act directs federal agencies to ensure actions authorized, funded, or carried out are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species. This project was streamlined on March 14, 2018. PROJECT The project is occurring on the Dubois Ranger District of the Caribou-Targhee National Forest in Clark County near Kilgore, Idaho. The legal description is Township 12 North, Range 38 East, Section 6; Township 13 North, Range 37 East, Section 25; and Township 13 North, Range 38 East, Sections 8, 16 to 21, and 27 to 33 (see attached maps). This project would last up to five years (2018 to 2022) and occur from July 15 through early November. Otis Gold Corporation would conduct exploration drilling on up to 140 drill sites on its claim in the Gold Ridge, Prospect Ridge, Dog Bone, and Mine Ridge areas.
    [Show full text]