High Altitude Fl Ights by Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna Ferruginea During Trans

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Altitude Fl Ights by Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna Ferruginea During Trans Journal of Avian Biology 48: 001–006, 2017 doi: 10.1111/jav.01443 © 2017 Th e Authors. Journal of Avian Biology © 2017 Nordic Society Oikos Subject Editor: Th omas Alerstam. Editor-in-Chief: Jan- Å ke Nilsson. Accepted 31 May 2017 High altitude fl ights by ruddy shelduck Tadorna ferruginea during trans-Himalayan migrations N. Parr , S. Bearhop , D. C. Douglas , J. Y. Takekawa , D. J. Prosser , S. H. Newman , W. M. Perry , S. Balachandran , M. J. Witt , Y. Hou , Z. Luo and L. A. Hawkes N. Parr (http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6115-6816), S. Bearhop and L. A. Hawkes ([email protected]), College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK. – D. C. Douglas, US Geological Survey Alaska Science Centre, Juneau, AK, USA. – J. Y. Takekawa, Audubon California, Tiburon, CA, USA. – D. J. Prosser, US Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Centre, Beltsville, MD, USA. – S. H. Newman, Foods and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Italy, and CMC Road next to ILRI, Gurd Shola, Bole Sub City, Kebele, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. – W. M. Perry, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA. – S. Balachandran, Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, India. – M. J. Witt, Environment and Sustainability Inst., Univ. of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK. – Y. Hou, Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve, Xining, China. – Z. Luo, Computer Network Information Center (CNIC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Birds that migrate across high altitude mountain ranges are faced with the challenge of maintaining vigorous exercise in environments with limited oxygen. Ruddy shelducks are known to use wintering grounds south of the Tibetan Plateau at sea level and breeding grounds north of Himalayan mountain range. Th erefore, it is likely these shelducks are preforming high altitude migrations. In this study we analyse satellite telemetry data collected from 15 ruddy shelduck from two populations wintering south of the Tibetan Plateau from 2007 to 2011. During north and south migrations ruddy shelduck travelled 1481 km (range 548 – 2671 km) and 1238 km (range 548 – 2689 km) respectively. We fi nd mean maximum altitudes of birds in fl ight reached 5590 m (range of means 4755 – 6800 m) and mean maximum climb rates of 0.45 m s – 1 (range 0.23 – 0.74 m s – 1 ). Th e ruddy shelduck is therefore an extreme high altitude migrant that has likely evolved a range of physiological adaptations in order to complete their migrations. Amongst the most impressive animal migrations are those tolerance and there is growing evidence that high altitude made by birds, which make the furthest and fastest migra- fl ights are undertaken by a variety of species (Liechti and tions of any animal (Gill et al. 2009, Egevang et al. 2010, Schaller 1999, Dolbeer 2006, Schmaljohann et al. 2009). Klaassen et al. 2011). Migrants that fl y across mountain Bar-headed geese Anser indicus are one such example, fl ying ranges experience changes in altitude, barometric pressure, across the Himalayas during their biannual migration, variable wind speeds and directions, decreasing air tempera- making vertical climbs up to 0.6 m s – 1 in excess of 5000 m ture and reduced humidity (Altshuler and Dudley 2006). In altitude (Hawkes et al. 2011, 2012). hypobaric air, the reduced air density leads to a reduction In order to sustain fl ights at high altitude, bar-headed in lift and increases the energetic cost of fl ying (although geese have evolved a number of physiological (Scott and there is a reduction in drag (Pennycuick 2008)). Th ere is Milsom 2007), morphological (Scott 2011) and biochemi- also a reduction in oxygen available (hypoxia) to fuel aero- cal adaptions (Jessen et al. 1991, Liang et al. 2001, Weber bic metabolism. During fl apping fl ight in a wind tunnel, 2007). Other avian species resident at high altitude have birds have been found to consume up to 10 – 12 times more adaptations such as haemoglobin conferring a higher affi nity oxygen than at rest (Ward et al. 2002) thus birds that fl y to oxygen than their low altitude counterparts (McCracken over mountain ranges must meet the challenge of maintain- et al. 2009, Galen et al. 2015) or greater muscle aerobic ing adequate oxygen supply to sustain long-distance fl ights capacity (Dawson et al. 2016). (Butler 2016). Birds have also been shown to use behavioural strate- Due to a number of pre-adaptations, birds have been gies to minimise energy expenditure during high altitude shown to have an inherently higher tolerance to hypoxia migrations. For example, bar-headed geese take a less ener- than mammals (Faraci 1991). For example, a house sparrow getically costly route across the Himalayas by tracking the Passer domesticus was able to maintain fl ight at a simulated terrain beneath them, rather than fl ying at higher altitudes altitude of 6100 m, whilst the same lack of oxygen avail- (Hawkes et al. 2012, Bishop et al. 2015). In addition bird ability rendered a mouse comatose (Tucker 1968). However, fl ight has often been found to be supported by favourable amongst avifauna there is a breadth in the extent of hypoxia wind conditions. For example, frigate birds Fregata minor EV-1 rise in thermals and then glide to minimise energy expendi- with a mean maximum altitude of 5590 m (range of means ture (Weimerskirch et al. 2016), and wandering albatrosses 4755 – 6800 m; Fig. 2). On average, ducks fl ew 547 m above Diomedea exulans maintain fl ight with heart rates little higher the ground during migration (grand mean value, range of than resting, when fl ying in tail winds (Weimerskirch et al. means 158 – 947 m). Shelducks travelled at a median speed 2000). Other birds optimise departure times to maximise of 13.7 m s – 1 (range 0.2 – 28.0 m s – 1 ), fl ying signifi cantly tail wind support (Hedenstrom et al. 2002, Gr ö nroos et al. faster at higher altitudes (12.44 m s – 1 below 4500 m, 14.55 2012, Gill et al. 2014, Kogure et al. 2016). m s – 1 above 4500 m, Wilcoxon W ϭ 7599, p ϭ 0.001, Fig. Given the presence of other species of waterfowl sharing 3). Climb rates decreased with altitude (0.24 m s – 1 below wintering and breeding grounds with bar-headed geese 4500 m, 0.18 m s – 1 above 4500 m Wilcoxon W ϭ 1229.5, (Prins and Namgail 2017) it seems reasonable to predict p ϭ 0.03). that there may be other Himalayan birds that have similar During the climb onto the Tibetan Plateau, movement capacities for fl ight at high altitude (Prosser et al. 2011). paths narrowed into a ‘ corridor ’ approximately 250 km Th is may include cranes and ducks, which satellite tracking wide where previously they had been more dispersed (up and ringing data suggest are likely to migrate in this area, to 450 km apart). Ruddy shelduck climbed from India however maximum fl ight altitudes have not been reported and Myanmar onto the Tibetan Plateau at mean maximum (Walkinshaw 1973, Hoyo et al. 1992, Higuchi et al. 1998, ascent rate of 0.45 m s – 1 (range 0.23 – 0.74 m s – 1 ). Th ere 2004, Qian et al. 2009). was no signifi cant diel pattern in the timing of climbing Th e ruddy shelduck Tadorna ferruginea ranges from east- fl ights (Rayleigh R ϭ 0.104, p ϭ 0.35); however, level ern Asia to south-eastern Europe and into northern Africa in (non-climbing) fl ight was more likely to take place ear- lower numbers (Birdlife International 2016 < www.birdlife. lier in the day (Rayleigh R ϭ 0.23, p Ͻ 0.01) and timings org/ > ). Within the larger Asian population, sub populations for fl ights signifi cantly diff ered to stationary locations; ϭ ϭ winter in lowlands in southern China, India and Myanmar t17 – 3.8, p 0.001 (Supplementary material Appendix and use breeding grounds on the Tibetan Plateau, thus cross- 1 Fig. A4). ing the Himalayas en route (Gaidet et al. 2010, Namgail et al. 2011, Nouidjem et al. 2015). Th ese subpopulations Ground elevation might therefore be predicted to potentially display relatively advanced adaptions for high altitude fl ight. Th e ground elevation under each shelduck location was In this study we describe the maximum altitudes and determined by overlaying GPS locations on a Digital climb rates of ruddy shelducks as they crossed the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau. We hypothesise that ruddy shelduck: 1) are able to support climb rates in excess of 0.3 m s – 1 and sustain fl ight in hypoxic conditions at altitudes Ͼ 5000 m; and 2) employ a fl ight strategy to minimise energy, fl ying at optimal times of day, gaining support from wind condi- tions and selecting routes of the lowest fl ight altitudes. Th is study presents the fi rst data on the fl ight performance of any species other than bar-headed geese at altitudes above the Tibetan Plateau, and the fi rst evidence of extreme high alti- tude fl ight in a bird of this size. Methods and results General tracking Ruddy shelduck were captured in China (n ϭ 26), and India (n ϭ 4), sexed, aged, weighed, and GPS tracked with a Microwave Telemetry (Columbia, MD, USA) PTT-100 solar-powered Argos/GPS platform transmitter terminal (PTT) attached using a tefl on backpack harness. Tracking data were obtained from the Argos System ( < www.argos- system.org/en > ). More details of tracking and analysis can be found in the Supplementary material Appendix 1. Ducks migrating northwards from India or Myanmar travelled 1418 km (median value, range 548 – 2671 km) in 24 d (range 2 – 65 d) (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 200 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard Pages xvii–xxiii: recent taxonomic changes, I have revised sev- Introduction to the Family Anatidae eral of the range maps to conform with more current information. For these updates I have Since the 978 publication of my Ducks, Geese relied largely on Kear (2005). and Swans of the World hundreds if not thou- Other important waterfowl books published sands of publications on the Anatidae have since 978 and covering the entire waterfowl appeared, making a comprehensive literature family include an identification guide to the supplement and text updating impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Movements of Wild Ruddy Shelducks in the Central Asian Flyway and Their Spatial Relationship to Outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1
    Viruses 2013, 5, 2129-2152; doi:10.3390/v5092129 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Article Movements of Wild Ruddy Shelducks in the Central Asian Flyway and Their Spatial Relationship to Outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 John Y. Takekawa 1,*, Diann J. Prosser 2, Bridget M. Collins 2, David C. Douglas 3, William M. Perry 4, Baoping Yan 5, Luo Ze 5, Yuansheng Hou 6, Fumin Lei 7, Tianxian Li 8, Yongdong Li 8 and Scott H. Newman 9,† 1 San Francisco Bay Estuary Field Station, Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 505 Azuar Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA 2 Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.J.P.); [email protected] (B.M.C.) 3 Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Juneau, AK 99801, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Dixon Field Station, Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA 95620, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Computer Network Information Center (CNIC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (B.Y.); [email protected] (L.Z.) 6 Qinghai State Forestry Administration, Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve (QLNNR), Xining 25700, Qinghai, China; E-Mail: [email protected] 7 Institute of Zoology (IOZ), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; E-Mail: [email protected] 8 Institute of Virology (WIV), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (T.L.); [email protected] (Y.L.) 9 EMPRES Wildlife Health and Ecology Unit, Animal Health Service, Animal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome 00153, Italy; E-Mail: [email protected] † Current address: Emergency Center for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD)-Vietnam, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), No.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Goose – Alopochen Aegyptiacus
    Scan for more Egyptian goose information Species Description Scientific name: Alopochen aegyptiacus Native to: Subtropical Africa Habitat: Inland freshwater bodies A small, stocky goose with apricot breast, white wing patch and dark eye patch. There are occasional records of Egyptian goose in Northern Ireland, which are likely to have arrived from established populations in England. They were first introduced into England in the late 17th century but during the 19th century they became increasingly common on private estates. In its native range, Egyptian goose is a pest of arable crops and could potentially become a similar nuisance in Northern Ireland. It shares the same habitat preferences as mallard and coot with which it might compete. Egyptian geese hybridise with native species in Africa and hybridisation with Canada geese (non-native) has been recorded in the UK. There is concern that it may hybridise with native species of goose, and threaten the conservation status of those species. In the Netherlands it is aggressive to nests of wading species. They could also potentially cause major damage to amenity grasslands, pastures and crops through grazing and trampling. Droppings could pose a health and safety risk to humans. Under the Invasive Alien Species (Enforcement and Permitting) Order (Northern Ireland) 2019 it is offence to intentionally keep; breed; transport to, from or within Northern Ireland, use or exchange Egyptian goose; or to release it into the environment. Male and female Egyptian geese are identical in plumage and cannot be distinguished Key ID Features in the field. Juvenile birds are similar to adults but lack the distinct facial markings.
    [Show full text]
  • Tadorna Ferruginea -- (Pallas, 1764)
    Tadorna ferruginea -- (Pallas, 1764) ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- ANSERIFORMES -- ANATIDAE Common names: Ruddy Shelduck; Tadorne casarca European Red List Assessment European Red List Status LC -- Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT°) In Europe this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). The population size may be moderately small to large, but it is not believed to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). The population trend is not known, but the population is not believed to be decreasing sufficiently rapidly to approach the thresholds under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern in Europe. In the EU27 the small population size qualifies for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<1,000 mature individuals), but as population size is increasing in the EU27, the final category is adjusted down one category to Near Threatened (NT°).
    [Show full text]
  • Ruddy Shelduck Shelduck
    +="( )" 5*, % *+ ,# %#8 " ) !" % Ruddy Shelduck was recorded in ten months of 20 at Cley Marsh in October. It is most and from 13 sites during 2005/06. The British likely that the majority of Ruddy Shelduck maximum of 22 was over twice that of the records originate from naturalised populations previous year. Half of the reports were of in mainland Europe. For example, numbers single birds and a further nine were of two have increased dramatically in Switzerland birds. All reports of more than two birds were over the last decade, with over 300 recorded from the North Norfolk Coast. These were of during waterbird counts there in November three at Holkham and Burnham Overy Fresh 2005, mostly in the northern half of the Marshes in January, and a record WeBS count country (V. Keller pers. comm.) "( 0 #$ -& :: 2" % - 2" 42 !+ 42 !" !+ The British Index for Shelduck dropped just coming during the moult period in July, whilst slightly in 2005/06, whilst the maximum count counts on the adjacent Dee Estuary peak in the was at its lowest for 30 years. The Northern autumn, and there is presumably a certain Ireland index, however, continues to rise as it degree of redistribution between these two has done steadily since the low in the early sites. Counts from the other sites supporting 1990s. The British monthly index shows a internationally important numbers were about peak in February following a gradual increase in line with their respective five-year means, through the winter as many birds return from with the exception of the Wash where numbers their moulting grounds in northwest Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Common Shelduck Tadorna Tadorna from the Vidarbha Region, Maharashtra, India J
    162 Indian Birds Vol. 9 Nos. 5&6 (Publ. 2 December 2014) First report of Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna from the Vidarbha region, Maharashtra, India J. S. Wadatkar & G. A. Wagh Wadatkar, J. S., & Wagh, G. A., 2014. First report of Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna from the Vidarbha region, Maharashtra, India. Indian BIRDS 9 (5&6): 162. J. S. Wadatkar, Wildlife & Environment Conservation Society, 42 Green Park Colony, Shegaon Road, Amravati, Maharashtra, India. Email: [email protected]. G. A.Wagh, Shri Shivaji Science College, Amravati 444603, Maharashtra, India. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received on 24 April 2014. he Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna is a summer visitor up to eastern Afghanistan, is found sporadically in TBaluchistan, and resident in modern day eastern Iran. It winters in northern and eastern Afghanistan, southern Sind, in provinces that are part of erstwhile eastern Punjab, currently in Pakistan, up to the Assam Valley. It extends down to Chilka Lake, Odisha, and has been reported from northern Maharashtra (Rasmussen et al. 2012). Malkhed Reservoir (20º84’33”N, 77º91’89”E), is located in Pohara Malkhed Reserve Forest in Amravati District, Maharashtra, and is 25 km from Amravati city. We visited the reservoir on 09 January 2011 for a casual birding trip. While observing a flock of Ruddy Shelduck T. ferruginea, one differently coloured individual caught our attention. We took a photograph for the record, and carefully resumed observation through binoculars. The bird was about the size of a Ruddy Shelduck, but was coloured white with 197. Common Shelduck Tadorna tadorna in flight at Malkhed Reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts and Program 4Th Pan-European Duck Symposium 7
    4th Pan-European Duck Symposium 7—11 April 2015 Hanko, Finland Abstracts and program Organising committee: Mikael Kilpi (Co-chair) Aleksi Lehikoinen (Co-chair) Sari Holopainen Jukka Rintala Veli-Matti Väänänen Scientific committee: Hannu Pöysä (Chair) Johan Elmberg Matthieu Guillemain Kim Jaatinen Petri Nummi Markus Öst Student prize committee: Jocelyn Champagnon Matthieu Guillemain Richard Hearn Johan Elmberg Cover pictures, logo and layout: Aleksi Lehikoinen 2 Organisers and sponsors 3 Time Wednesday, 8 April 9:00-9:30 Opening/Welcome speeches 9:30-10:20 Plenary 1 David Koons: Next-gen studies of waterfowl population dynamics 10:20-10:45 Coffee break Session: Population dynamics and trends, Chair: Hannu Pöysä Jukka Rintala: Quantifying large-scale environmental effects on temporal population 10:45-11:00 dynamics of Finnish waterfowl Diego Pavón-Jordán: Impact of breeding and wintering weather conditions on population 11:00-11:15 dynamics of Finnish waterbirds Sari Holopainen: Population dynamics in the Common Teal - Importance of climate in 11:15-11:30 breeding and wintering areas 11:30-11:45 Anthony D. Fox: Recent changes in wintering Eurasian Wigeon numbers in NW Europe Lasse Kurvinen: The decline of the Eider Duck in a core breeding area on the Finnish 11:45-12:00 coast - a detailed look at colony dynamics 12:00-13:30 Lunch Session: Habitats and management, Chair: Johan Elmberg Michael A. Johnson: Managing duck recruitment in a highly fragmented landscape: can 13:30-13:45 our history guide us? Mikko Alhainen: Working for wetlands
    [Show full text]
  • Red Data Book of European Vertebrates : a Contribution to Action Theme N° 11 of the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy, Final Draft
    Strasbourg, 5 July 2001 T-PVS (2001) 31 [Bern\T-PVS 2001\tpvs31e_2001] English only CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee Preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates Draft for comments - Volume 1 - Joint project between the Council of Europe and the European Environment Agency, based on WCMC draft from 1998. Co-ordinated by the European Topic Centre/Nature Conservation – Paris This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS (2001) 31 - II - Comments should be sent to: European Topic Centre for Nature Protection and Biodiversity MNHN 57 rue Cuvier 75231 PARIS Cedex, France [email protected] - III - T-PVS (2001) 31 About this draft Red List This document is the result of a joint project between the European Environment Agency and the Council of Europe to develop a preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates. It is based on a first draft by WCMC in 1998. Except for Birds (Birdlife International, 1994), no assessment is yet available on the conservation status of Vertebrate species at European level, while Red Books exist at national level in almost all European countries. On the other hand, a global list of threatened species is published and maintained up-dated by IUCN according to well defined criteria (IUCN, 2000). The present assessment is a first attempt to identify the most threatened Vertebrates species at European level, building upon a first analysis of the list of globally threatened species present in Europe (WCMC, 1998) and taking into account the most recent available overviews on European species distribution provided by the various European atlas committees (European Bird Census Council; Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Societas Europea Mammalogica).
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Front Matter
    Tertiary fossil waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes) of Australia and New Zealand Trevor H. Worthy Table of contents CHAPTER 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 1.3.4.1 1.3.4.2 1.3.4.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 CHAPTER 2 Journal of Systematic Palaeontology CHAPTER 3 ManuherikiaDunstanettaMiotadorna Palaeontology CHAPTER 4 Manuherikia Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand CHAPTER 5 Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society CHAPTER 6 Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology CHAPTER 7 Emu CHAPTER 8 Tadorna Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia CHAPTER 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 R 9.6.1 Presbyornis 9.6.2 CnemiornisCereopsis 9.6.3 Dendrocygna 9.6.4 Plectropterus 9.6.5 9.6.6 9.6.7 9.7 CHAPTER 10 Appendix 1 Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences Appendix 2 Anser scaldiiBulletin of the British Ornithologist’s Club Abstract Anseranas CereopsisStictonetta MalacorhynchusBiziura DendrocygnaOxyura Manuherikia DunstanettaMatanasMiotadorna ManuherikiaDunstanetta Miotadorna MiotadornaTadorna ManuherikiaDunstanettaStictonettaMalacorhynchus OxyuraBiziuraManuherikia Cereopsis PinpanettaAustralotadorna Pinpanetta ManuherikiaDunstanetta StictonettaMionetta MalacorhynchusPinpanettaManuherikiaDunstanettaOxyura NomonyxBiziuraThalassornis Dendrocygna AnserpicaAnatalavis Pinpanetta Anseranas semipalmataCereopsis novaehollandiaeCygnus atratusTadorna tadornoidesBiziura lobataOxyura
    [Show full text]
  • Akşehir Gölündeki Ördeklerde (Anseriformes: Anatidae) Bulunan Bit (Phthiraptera) Türleri Üzerine Araştırmalar
    Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg JOURNAL HOME-PAGE: http://vetdergi.kafkas.edu.tr RESEARCH ARTICLE 18 (6): 1055-1060, 2012 ONLINE SUBMISSION: http://vetdergikafkas.org Studies on Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera) Species Found on Some Duck (Anseriformes: Anatidae) Species at Lake Akşehir, Turkey Bilal DİK * Uğur USLU * Selcuk University Veterinary Faculty, Department of Parasitology, Alaaddin Keykubat Kampüsü, TR-42075 Selçuklu, * Konya - TURKEY Makale Kodu (Article Code): KVFD-2012-7020 Summary The present study was conducted between September 2010 and November 2011 to identify louse species parasitizing ducks at Lake Akşehir. Within the study period, 54 ducks, which belonged to seven different avian species (teal, garganey, shoveler, northern pintail, mallard, ruddy shelduck, common shelduck) and were found either alive or wounded or had been shot by hunters, were examined for the presence of lice. After examined macroscopically for the presence of ectoparasites, all ducks were placed into a white tub and medicated with propoxur or tetramethrin. The louse specimens collected from the animals were preserved in 70% alcohol, cleared in 10% KOH, passed through a graded series of alcohol, and mounted in Canada balsam for species identification by light microscopy. Of the 54 ducks examined, 29 (53.70%) were found to have been infested with lice. In total, eight louse species were identified, 4 (Anatoecus regina, Anaticola magnificus, Holomenopon tadornae, Trinoton querquedulae) of which had infested the ruddy shelduck (Tadorna ferruginea), 2 (Anaticola crassicornis, Trinoton sp.) of which had infested the common shelduck (Tadorna tadorna), 4 (A. crassicornis, Anatoecus dentatus, Anatoecus icterodes, Trinoton querquedulae) of which had infested the teal (Anas crecca), 1 (T.
    [Show full text]
  • PODOCES 3 1-2 Daily Flight Rhythms of Ducks in Turkey
    Pododces, 2008, 3(1/2): 39–44 Daily Arrival and Departure Patterns of Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea , Northern Pintail Anas acuta and Mallard Anas platyrhynchos During Early Autumn at Kuyucuk Lake, Northeastern Turkey WŁODZIMIERZ MEISSNER * & MAGDALENA REMISIEWICZ Avian Ecophysiology Unit, Dept. of Vertebrate Ecology and Zoology, University of Gda ńsk, al. Legionów 9, PL 80-441 Gda ńsk, Poland * Correspondence Author. Email: [email protected] Received 10 May 2008; accepted 15 July 2008 Abstract: Between 25 and 28 September 2006 we observed daily local movements of non- breeding flocks of Ruddy Shelducks Tadorna ferruginea , Northern Pintails Anas acuta and Mallards Anas platyrhynchos staying at Kuyucuk Lake (northeastern Turkey). Mass departures of all three species from the lake started about 6:00 and most of the birds flew away within half an hour. Arrivals began only after 6:00 and lasted about twice as long as the departures. In the Ruddy Shelduck, there was a clear 135–180 minute gap between arrival and departure periods. In the Mallard and Northern Pintail, departures and arrivals overlapped to some extent. Afternoon flights were more extended in time and varied between days. Departures and arrivals were well separated only in the Ruddy Shelduck. Arrivals started c. 2 hours after departures both in the morning and in the evening. Observed rapid morning departures and two daily peaks of flight activity resemble patterns recorded elsewhere in these species and other ducks and geese during the non-breeding season. Keywords: Ruddy Shelduck, Northern Pintail, Mallard, foraging, stopover, farmlands, flight movements, Kuyucuk Lake. INTRODUCTION night and a part of the day, and they forage on surrounding fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Ruddy Shelduck Records
    RUDDY SHELDUCK Tadorna ferruginea is a rare vagrant to north-west Europe, whose status has been clouded by escapes and an increasing European feral population. The BOURC are reviewing the status of Ruddy Shelduck on the British List. The species is currently in Categories B, D, and E of the British List but is potentially also occurring in Britain as a vagrant from established naturalised populations on the near continent and is therefore a candidate for Category C5 (vagrant naturalised species from outside Britain). Below is an extract from available literature and the KOS records database. Please take the time to review your own records, and if they are not listed here, or if you provide more detail, please submit to the County Recorder, Barry Wright ([email protected]), to include location, first/last date, number of birds, observers, and any other relevant information, at your earliest convenience. There have also been records of related species, such as South African or Cape Shelduck, and hybrids. A list of these records is provided after the Ruddy Shelduck details. The current Kent records of Ruddy Shelduck are as follows - 1885 Newenden, single duck, obtained on an unknown date during April. ca. One shot, exact date and location unknown. 1900 1943 North Kent marshes, duck, shot, 17th August 1950 Cliffe Pools, drake, shot, 30th April for a month. 1967 Swanscombe, adult duck, 28th April; later seen at Chetney, Stoke and High Halstow, until 22nd May. 1973 Lower Hope Point, single bird, 20th February. Cliffe Pools, single bird, 22nd September. Stour Valley, single bird, 11th-14th August.
    [Show full text]