Charles Gleyre's Penthée and the Creative Imagination

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charles Gleyre's Penthée and the Creative Imagination Charles Gleyre's Penthée and the creative imagination Autor(en): Hauptman, William Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Zeitschrift für schweizerische Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte = Revue suisse d'art et d'archéologie = Rivista svizzera d'arte e d'archeologia = Journal of Swiss archeology and art history Band (Jahr): 43 (1986) Heft 2 PDF erstellt am: 23.09.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-168781 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Charles Gleyre's Penthée and the Creative Imagination by William Hauptman f&fm W Fig Charles Gleyre, Penthée poursuivi par les Mènads, 1864-5.121x200,7 cm, oil on canvas. Öffentliche Kunstsammlung Basel (Inv. 249). It has become one of the chief tasks of the historian of generally incorrect or in some cases never fully comprehended. nineteenth century art to reassess schools of art and individual artists who have heretofore been neglected or haphazardly An important example of this unnecessary neglect is the relegated to the second rank. The goal of this career of Marc-Charles-Gabriel Gleyre. Since the large revisionist history, already begun in the 1970's in regard to the centennary exhibition of 1974 in Europe and the first American nature of academic and "official" art1, is to see in a new showing of his works in 19803, it has become clear that perspective the fertile development of nineteenth century Gleyre's painting was much richer in style, content, and art without the prejuidicial view that academic art need imagination than generally accorded. Indeed, Théophile necessarily be linked to bad taste or entirely removed from Gautiefs caricterization of Gleyre in 1845 as a peintre-philosophe4 avant-garde trends. Thus, new studies have come forth describes more aptly the nature of his mature works; recently of not only forgotten painters and sculptors, but for a detailed examination of his paintings reveals an exploration also of such unpreviously studied areas as the art of Eastern of subject and theme that is too often hidden beneath Europe, Scandinavia, Italy, and Switzerland, to name but a the polished surface of a seemingly simple iconographie few examples.2 The results of these investigations indicate structure. This effort on the part of Gleyre to develop an that the previous ideas held by historians in regard to the uncommon iconographie and philosophic element in his values and dimensions of these artists and schools had been œuvre stems already from his first success in the Paris salon 215 in 1843 in the curious imagery of Le Soir, more commonly contain the terrifying and gruesome events surrounding known as Les Illusions perdues. The seemingly facile image Pentheus' actions and subsequent fate. The central element of regret and loss portrayed through the old bard and the in the myth is the power of the Dionysiac cult which receeding boat veils a deeper meaning aligned not only to included in its rites such practices as the tearing apart of autobiographical circumstances, but also to the literary and animals and the devouring of their flesh raw. Pentheus was philosophic trends of the period.5 the son of Agaue and Echion and consequently the inheritor It is difficult to easily classify the artistic flow of Gleyre's of the throne of Thebes. When Dionysius returned to art because of the painter's own fluctuating ideals and his Thebes to establish his cult, Pentheus, in an act of supreme constant search for new expressive forms. He was content mortal arrogance, refused to allow his worship, thus also neither as a Classicist nor as a Romantic and may be said to denying the god's own divinity. Although Pentheus was have attempted to find a mediating path between the two repeatedly warned against his attitude towards the gods by extremes, ajuste-milieu of which his Soir, with its academic the blind soothsayer Tiresias - in Ovid, Pentheus is technique but romantic sentiment, is but an early example. described as "unus contemptor superum," one who despises As Hippolyte Taine noted, Gleyre was an extremely private the gods -, he nevertheless accepted the challenge of his man who rarely verbalized his artistic philosophy even to his royal right against the divine rights of the gods. Yet, despite closest friends.6 There are, in fact, large contradictions in his the ban on the Dionysiac worship, the power of the cult was paintings and artistic credo that often seem to defy so great that it was secretely practiced by the Theban traditional artistic rubrics: while he often relied upon classical or women, including Pentheus' own mother Agaue. Pentheus religious motifs, he also sought out new dimensions in permitted himself to be tempted into seeing the actual rites nationalistic historical works7, produced dozens of sketches performed, but in hiding and disguised as a woman.13 He and esquisses for works that have yet to be identified was later discovered by his mother who in her frenzied state because of their obscure subjects, and even developed mistook him for a wild boar, captured and dismembered projects on grandiose Saint-Simonian themes replete with him, and brought her son's head back to the palace in new political emblems.8 It is perhaps typical of Gleyre's triumph. The moral of the story is that the disobedience of changing values that while he spent more time in the Near the gods is followed by swift punishment. East than most of his contemporaries, he never fully applied the imagery of the Orient in his work despite his own large corpus of pictorial souvenirs which he guarded jealously in The history of the painting his atelier until his death in 1874.9 Yet, a constant strain in Gleyre's paintings, whether drawn from classical, religious, The precise development of Gleyre's painting has never historical, or even invented inconography, is the desire to been completely elucidated. The painter's friend and utilize elements and themes which were not current at the biographer, the critic Charles Clement, provides the basic time-in effect, to develop a pictorial imagery from nontradi- information on the origin of the work14, but from the tional sources in the effort to enrich the subsurface content perspective of his own memories and without thorough of his pictures. In this light, a study of his painting Penthée documentation. Clément noted that Gleyre begun work on the poursuivi par les Ménades (fig. 1), painted in 1864-65, provides subject, in the form of two sketches which would later an essential base for further comprehending the furnish the painter with the essential elements of the originality that marks Gleyre's later works. An examination of iconography, during the first years of their association - that is the painting also underscores certain aspects of Swiss to say, in the late 1840's.15 At this time, Gleyre was well on artistic politics in its commission by the Basel art establishment the way to critical and popular success. After the triumphant and the problems surrounding its loan for an exhibition showing of Le Soir in 1843, he followed with his Séparation of Gleyre's works later. des Apôtres, now in Montargis, in the salon of 1845 where It should be stated at the outset that the iconography of the painter was awarded a coveted first-class medal: most Pentheus is in itself very rare in the pictorial arts. Most of critics hailed the work as a masterpiece of religious genre the examples found are from antique vases and coins, or in and praised particularly the originality of the subject.16 fresco decorations, the most well-known being in the House Gleyre's own interest in classical subject matter was heightened of the Vetii in Pompeii.10 For later art, not one example has in late 1845 with a trip to Northern Italy where he been located before Gleyre's choice of the subject, despite studied the works of the Renaissance and Baroque masters. the fact that the theme had appeared in nineteenth century This provided Gleyre with a renewed impetus for mythological French literature.11 Thus, Gleyre's use of the story as the subjects, producing shortly afterwards such works as his subject of a major painting emphasizes clearly the artist's Cléonis et Cydippe, the iconography of which seems to have desire for innovative practice and freshness in regard to been invented17, the Nymphe Echo, which reveals the thematic selection. influence of Venetian art18, and the gigantic Danse des The literary sources for the story of Pentheus derive Bacchantes, finished only in 1849 and seen briefly in the salon of principally from Euripides and Ovid, both of which were that year - the last work Gleyre would show in the Paris available to Gleyre in translation, the former in a new exhibitions - before it was installed in the Spanish royal edition of 1842.'2 Few stories from classical mythology collection.19 216 r - ¦ü Wv !> •* ;|> É Y r * ¦yn Y ¦i ¦:¦*; S§! :.
Recommended publications
  • Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice
    Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice PUBLICATIONS COORDINATION: Dinah Berland EDITING & PRODUCTION COORDINATION: Corinne Lightweaver EDITORIAL CONSULTATION: Jo Hill COVER DESIGN: Jackie Gallagher-Lange PRODUCTION & PRINTING: Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZERS: Erma Hermens, Art History Institute of the University of Leiden Marja Peek, Central Research Laboratory for Objects of Art and Science, Amsterdam © 1995 by The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-89236-322-3 The Getty Conservation Institute is committed to the preservation of cultural heritage worldwide. The Institute seeks to advance scientiRc knowledge and professional practice and to raise public awareness of conservation. Through research, training, documentation, exchange of information, and ReId projects, the Institute addresses issues related to the conservation of museum objects and archival collections, archaeological monuments and sites, and historic bUildings and cities. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. COVER ILLUSTRATION Gherardo Cibo, "Colchico," folio 17r of Herbarium, ca. 1570. Courtesy of the British Library. FRONTISPIECE Detail from Jan Baptiste Collaert, Color Olivi, 1566-1628. After Johannes Stradanus. Courtesy of the Rijksmuseum-Stichting, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Historical painting techniques, materials, and studio practice : preprints of a symposium [held at] University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 26-29 June 1995/ edited by Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-322-3 (pbk.) 1. Painting-Techniques-Congresses. 2. Artists' materials- -Congresses. 3. Polychromy-Congresses. I. Wallert, Arie, 1950- II. Hermens, Erma, 1958- . III. Peek, Marja, 1961- ND1500.H57 1995 751' .09-dc20 95-9805 CIP Second printing 1996 iv Contents vii Foreword viii Preface 1 Leslie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Gleyre's Penthée and the Creative Imagination
    Charles Gleyre's Penthée and the creative imagination Autor(en): Hauptman, William Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Zeitschrift für schweizerische Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte = Revue suisse d'art et d'archéologie = Rivista svizzera d'arte e d'archeologia = Journal of Swiss archeology and art history Band (Jahr): 43 (1986) Heft 2 PDF erstellt am: 10.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-168781 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Charles Gleyre's Penthée and the Creative Imagination by William Hauptman f&fm W Fig Charles Gleyre, Penthée poursuivi par les Mènads, 1864-5.121x200,7 cm, oil on canvas.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierre Auguste Renoir
    Pierre Auguste Renoir Pierre Auguste Renoir (“Ren-WAH”) 1841-1919 ! French Impressionist Painter The French painter Pierre Auguste Renoir was Vocabulary one of the leading members of the Impressionist movement. He began his career in a Parisian Complementary colors—Colors that are porcelain factory gaining experience with light, opposite each other on the color wheel (red and fresh colors that were to distinguish his green, blue and orange, yellow and violet). When Impressionist work. When he was 21, he entered placed next to each other, both complementary the Paris studio of artist Charles Gleyre, and colors seem brighter and stronger, providing became friends with fellow students Claude emphasis for each and creating a visual vibration Monet, Alfred Sisley, and Frederic Bazille. In the or glow. 1860s Renoir and his friends joined with other avant-garde artists to form a loose knit group Impressionism—A style of art, originating in known as the Impressionists. Paris in the 1860s, in which the main idea was to show changes in the light, color or actions of Renoir was particularly interested in people and scenes with quick brush strokes of color. often painted his friends. His paintings of beautiful Impressionists had two fundamental concerns: women, lovely children, lush landscapes and depicting modern life and painting in the open air. lighthearted picnics and dances reflected his Although their artistic styles and aims were not celebration of natural beauty and the French uniform, as a group they rejected the standard of leisure life in the countryside and cafés of Paris. the day as dictated by the Salon, the officially Renoir masterfully rendered the shimmering approved group of artists.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Impressionism
    A Guide to Impressionism Learn about the history and artistic style of the Impressionists in this teacher’s resource. Find out why the Impressionists were considered so shocking and how they have influenced art over a hundred years later. Explore the art of Monet, Renoir, Degas, and more! Grade Level: Adult, College, Grades 6-8, Grades 9-12 Collection: European Art, Impressionism Culture/Region: Europe Subject Area: Fine Arts, History and Social Science, Visual Arts Activity Type: Art in Depth THE SHOCKING NEW ART MOVEMENT The word “impressionism” makes most people think of beautiful, sunlit paintings of the French countryside; glorious gardens and lily ponds; and fashionable Parisians enjoying life in charming cafes. But in 1874, when the men and women who came to be known as the Impressionists first exhibited their work, their style of painting was considered shocking and outrageous by all but the most forward-thinking viewers. Why did these young artists cause such an uproar? The following comparison shows how their radical ideas, techniques, and subjects broke the time-honored rules and traditions of art in late 19th-century France. “What do we see in the work of these men? Nothing but defiance, almost an insult to the tastes and intelligence of the public.” -Etienne Carjat, “L’exposition du bouldevard des Capucines,” Le Patriote Francais (1874) “There is little doubt that Impressionist landscape paintings are the most…appreciated works of art ever produced.” –Richard Brettell and Scott Schaefer, A Day in the Country: Impressionism and the French Landscape The accepted style of painting often featured: Great historical subjects or mythological scenes that were meant to be morally uplifting; An emphasis on line, filled in with color; Smooth, almost invisible brushstrokes; Paintings primarily done in the artist’s studio The Judgment of Paris François-Xavier Fabre, 1808 Oil on canvass Adolph D.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of the Collection of American Paintings in the Corcoran Gallery of Art
    A Catalogue of the Collection of American Paintings in The Corcoran Gallery of Art VOLUME I THE CORCORAN GALLERY OF ART WASHINGTON, D.C. A Catalogue of the Collection of American Paintings in The Corcoran Gallery of Art Volume 1 PAINTERS BORN BEFORE 1850 THE CORCORAN GALLERY OF ART WASHINGTON, D.C Copyright © 1966 By The Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. 20006 The Board of Trustees of The Corcoran Gallery of Art George E. Hamilton, Jr., President Robert V. Fleming Charles C. Glover, Jr. Corcoran Thorn, Jr. Katherine Morris Hall Frederick M. Bradley David E. Finley Gordon Gray David Lloyd Kreeger William Wilson Corcoran 69.1 A cknowledgments While the need for a catalogue of the collection has been apparent for some time, the preparation of this publication did not actually begin until June, 1965. Since that time a great many individuals and institutions have assisted in com- pleting the information contained herein. It is impossible to mention each indi- vidual and institution who has contributed to this project. But we take particular pleasure in recording our indebtedness to the staffs of the following institutions for their invaluable assistance: The Frick Art Reference Library, The District of Columbia Public Library, The Library of the National Gallery of Art, The Prints and Photographs Division, The Library of Congress. For assistance with particular research problems, and in compiling biographi- cal information on many of the artists included in this volume, special thanks are due to Mrs. Philip W. Amram, Miss Nancy Berman, Mrs. Christopher Bever, Mrs. Carter Burns, Professor Francis W.
    [Show full text]
  • Art Movements Referenced : Artists from France: Paintings and Prints from the Art Museum Collection
    UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING ART MUSEUM 2009 Art Movements Referenced : Artists from France: Paintings and Prints from the Art Museum Collection OVERVIEW Sarah Bernhardt. It was an overnight sensation, and Source: www.wikipedia.org/ announced the new artistic style and its creator to The following movements are referenced: the citizens of Paris. Initially called the Style Mucha, (Mucha Style), this soon became known as Art Art Nouveau Les Nabis Nouveau. The Barbizon School Modernism Art Nouveau’s fifteen-year peak was most strongly Cubism Modern Art felt throughout Europe—from Glasgow to Moscow Dadaism Pointillism to Madrid — but its influence was global. Hence, it Les Fauves Surrealism is known in various guises with frequent localized Impressionism Symbolism tendencies. In France, Hector Guimard’s metro ART NOUVEau entrances shaped the landscape of Paris and Emile Gallé was at the center of the school of thought Art Nouveau is an international movement and in Nancy. Victor Horta had a decisive impact on style of art, architecture and applied art—especially architecture in Belgium. Magazines like Jugend helped the decorative arts—that peaked in popularity at the spread the style in Germany, especially as a graphic turn of the 20th century (1890–1905). The name ‘Art artform, while the Vienna Secessionists influenced art nouveau’ is French for ‘new art’. It is also known as and architecture throughout Austria-Hungary. Art Jugendstil, German for ‘youth style’, named after the Nouveau was also a movement of distinct individuals magazine Jugend, which promoted it, and in Italy, such as Gustav Klimt, Charles Rennie Mackintosh, Stile Liberty from the department store in London, Alphonse Mucha, René Lalique, Antoni Gaudí and Liberty & Co., which popularized the style.
    [Show full text]
  • Impressionism
    IMPRESSIONISM Eugène Boudin (1824 – 1898) was one of the first French landscape painters to paint outdoors. Boudin was a marine painter, and expert in the rendering of all that goes upon the sea and along its shores. His pastels, summary and economic, garnered the splendid eulogy of Baudelaire; and Corot called him the "king of the skies.” He opened a small picture framing shop in Le Havre and exhibited artists working in the area, such as Jean-François Millet, and Thomas Couture who encouraged young Boudin to follow an artistic career. Boudin, The Beach at Villerville 1864 In 1857/58 Boudin befriended the young Claude Monet, then only 18, and persuaded him to give up his teenage caricature drawings and to become a landscape painter, instilling in the younger painter a love of bright hues and the play of light on water later evident in Monet's Impressionist paintings. They remained lifelong friends and Boudin joined Monet and his young friends in the first Impressionist exhibition in 1873. Boudin, Sailboats at Trouville 1884 Johan Jongkind (1819 – 1891) was a Dutch painter and printmaker. He painted marine landscapes in a free manner and is regarded as a forerunner of Impressionism, introducing the painting of genre scenes from the tradition of the Dutch Golden Age. From 1846 he moved to Paris, to further his studies. Two years later, he had work accepted for the Paris Salon, receiving acclaim from critic Charles Baudelaire and later on from Émile Zola. Returning to Rotterdam in1865 he moved back to Paris in1861, where he rented a studio Jongkind, in Montparnasse, the following year meeting in View from the Quai d'Orsay 1854 Honfleur Sisley, Boudin and the young Monet.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierre Auguste Renoir
    Pierre Auguste Renoir Biography standards for Salon acceptance and the new styles of art were evident when the Emperor, Napoleon III, decreed that the thousands of rejected works of art were to be shown at an alternative Salon--the Salon des Refusés. This one-time show exhibited examples of a more modern art, including new, “looser” painting techniques and subject matter of modern landscapes and contemporary views of Parisian life. Renoirʼs first submission to the Salon was in 1864. His entry, entitled “Esmeralda Dancing with a Goat” (taken from Victor Hugoʼs novel Notre- Dame de Paris) was accepted because its subject matter was favored by the Salon jury. Although he continued to submit paintings for the next several years, his works were rejected, and he became irritated by the academic atmosphere of the Salon, believing that the fixed rules of academic painting were too restrictive. Pierre Auguste Renoir was born in Limoges, France on February 25, 1841, the sixth child of a During the late 1860s, Renoir often found himself tailor. When Renoir was four years old, the family in the company of the friends he met while a moved to Paris, to a humble apartment that was student. He and Claude Monet often painted near the Louvre. He showed a talent for drawing together, with Monet leading the charge to paint at an early age, using his fatherʼs tailorʼs chalk to outdoors. Monet was absorbed with the exact sketch portraits of his family on the floors and analysis of the colors in light and shadow as seen walls of the family home.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Material for Reference Only
    1841–77 Chapter 1 1841–77 Renoir to age 36; a Bohemian Leader among the Impressionists; Model Lise and their Secret Children, Pierre and Jeanne In November 1861, when he was only twenty, Renoir made one of the most fortuitous decisions he ever took: to study in the Parisian studio of the Swiss painter, Charles Gleyre. A photograph around this time reveals that Renoir was a serious, intense young man. Gleyre’s studio was simply one of many that fed into the École des Beaux-Arts (the government-sponsored art school in Paris), where students learned anatomy and perspective through drawing and paint- ing. Te men Renoir met at Gleyre’s would become some of the most important companions of his life. About a year after he arrived, first Alfred Sisley in October, then Frédéric Bazille in November and lastly Claude Monet in December 1862 became fellow students.1 On 31 December 1862, the four were already close friends when they met at Bazille’s home in Paris to celebrate the New Year together.2 Trough these friends, Renoir met Paul Cézanne and Camille Pissarro, studying nearby at the Académie Suisse. Tese artists would not only become lifelong friends, but would also be of critical importance for Renoir’s artistic Renoir, 1861. Photographer unknown development. In his early twenties, Renoir also made the acquaintances of Édouard Manet and Edgar Degas. Trough them, he later met the two women of his training: ‘Not having rich parents and wanting to be a painter, began by artists, Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt. By the early 1870s, all of these painters way of crafts: porcelain, faience, blinds, paintings in cafés.’3 Despite his artisan would form the core of the Impressionist movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919)
    Caroline Mc Corriston Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) ● Renoir grew up in Paris. From the age of 15 he worked as a porcelain painter and saved enough money so that he could study art. ● Renoir copied old master paintings in the Louvre. ● He was influenced by Courbet. ● As a young artist in the 1860s, Renoir had paintings accepted for the Salon Exhibition. ● In 1860 he enrolled at the teaching studio of the academic artist Charles Gleyre, where he befriended Monet and Sisley. His friendship with Monet was crucial and resulted in Renoir’s adoption of the plein air painting, his use of brighter colours and freer handling of paint. ● His early Impressionist paintings were rejected and Renoir struggled to support his family. ● The impressionist style was founded during the summer of 1869, when Monet, Sisley and Renoir painted scenes along the river Seine. Renoir and Monet’s paintings were remarkably similar when they worked together in the early years. Together they : *Observed that the colour of an object is affected by the light and reflections of surrounding objects. *Discovered that shadows are not brown or black but in fact coloured. *Became fascinated with flickering light and shimmering colour in outdoor scenes. ● Renoir helped to organise the first impressionist exhibition and showed his work in the first three exhibitions (1874-77) and again in 1882. Personal Style and Technique ● After painting in the impressionist style for over 10 years Renoir began to question Impressionism’s emphasis on visual effects. He burned some of his work. ● In 1881, having ‘wrung impressionism dry’, he went to Italy to study renaissance art seeking ‘an art of more ‘permanent qualities’, as he put it.
    [Show full text]
  • Earl Shinn, Art Criticism, and National Identity in Gilded Age America
    Haverford College Fashioning Taste: Earl Shinn, Art Criticism, and National Identity in Gilded Age America A Thesis Submitted to Lisa Jane Graham, Associate Professor of History and Gustavus Stadler, Associate Professor of English Department of History By Daniel Timothy Lenehan Haverford, Pennsylvania 25 April 2005 Contents Preface 2 Introduction 4 Chapter One: “That Paris was the America of art” 12 Chapter Two: “The Great Objects of Art Criticism” 32 Chapter Three: The Art Treasures of America 52 Conclusion 72 Bibliography 76 1 Preface Working in an archival collection is not always fun. I learned this lesson in the summer of 2004 when I was a student assistant at Haverford College’s Quaker Collection. My job was to organize and catalogue with another student the Morris-Shinn- Maier Collection, a manuscript collection that the college had acquired in 1998. Reading and sorting the letters, diaries, marriage licenses, wills, and financial records of these families certainly had its rewards, but I occasionally found myself bored by the seemingly never-ending stream of quotidian anecdotes and property tax receipts that I encountered each day in the archives. Despite my periodic lack of interest in the collection, however, I will be forever grateful for the opportunity it gave me of ‘meeting’ Earl Shinn, a nineteenth-century Quaker art critic with a penchant for writing wonderfully funny letters. I loved reading his correspondences with his siblings and laughing at his playfully sarcastic comments. Every day I looked forward to learning about his life, his experiences in Pont-Aven, his ambiguous relationship to Quakerism, his evenings with the Tile Club, and his almost religious devotion to culture and the fine arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Monet Impressionism and the Late 19Th Century at Joslyn Art
    Claude Monet a biography Impressionism and the Late 19th Century at Joslyn Art Museum Claude Monet was born on November 14, significant features of the scene, and Monet considered Jongkind his true master. While Academic Art, with its classically world, including America. 1840 in Paris, France. Five years later, his Eventually Monet returned to Paris and enrolled in Charles Gleyre’s studio. proportioned figures, anecdotal subjects, Soon, however, a new wave of artists father moved their family to the French During this time, Monet lead excursions to the Fontainebleau Forest to paint outdoors. precise details, and flawless surfaces, became dissatisfied with Impressionism’s seacoast city of Le Havre. In 1900, Monet He focused on painting with rapid brush continued to be popular well into the twentieth lack of emotional depth and visual coherence described his childhood as “essentially one of strokes while concentrating on the effects century, Impressionism and, like Camille Pissarro, freedom. I was born undisciplineable. No one of light. Monet married Camille Doncieux emerged in the last third of developed stylistic was ever able to make me stick to the rules, in 1870 and they, along with their son Jean, the nineteenth century as variations which are not even in my youngest days.” relocated to London when the Prussian army the dominant style of the collectively called Post- During his teenage years, Monet decorated moved on Paris. avant-garde. Impressionism. At the his textbooks’ margins with sketches, and by the When the war ended, Monet moved his Fascinated with sense same time, a wider circle time he reached 15 he received commissions family to Argenteuil in France using the perception, Impressionists of painters adopted Claude Monet, French, 1840-1926 for his caricatures.
    [Show full text]