Primary Lateral Sclerosis Presenting Parkinsonian Symptoms Without
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Primary Lateral Sclerosis, Upper Motor Neuron Dominant Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia
brain sciences Review Upper Motor Neuron Disorders: Primary Lateral Sclerosis, Upper Motor Neuron Dominant Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Timothy Fullam and Jeffrey Statland * Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, KS 66160, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Following the exclusion of potentially reversible causes, the differential for those patients presenting with a predominant upper motor neuron syndrome includes primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), or upper motor neuron dominant ALS (UMNdALS). Differentiation of these disorders in the early phases of disease remains challenging. While no single clinical or diagnostic tests is specific, there are several developing biomarkers and neuroimaging technologies which may help distinguish PLS from HSP and UMNdALS. Recent consensus diagnostic criteria and use of evolving technologies will allow more precise delineation of PLS from other upper motor neuron disorders and aid in the targeting of potentially disease-modifying therapeutics. Keywords: primary lateral sclerosis; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; hereditary spastic paraplegia Citation: Fullam, T.; Statland, J. Upper Motor Neuron Disorders: Primary Lateral Sclerosis, Upper 1. Introduction Motor Neuron Dominant Jean-Martin Charcot (1825–1893) and Wilhelm Erb (1840–1921) are credited with first Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and describing a distinct clinical syndrome of upper motor neuron (UMN) tract degeneration in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia. Brain isolation with symptoms including spasticity, hyperreflexia, and mild weakness [1,2]. Many Sci. 2021, 11, 611. https:// of the earliest described cases included cases of hereditary spastic paraplegia, amyotrophic doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11050611 lateral sclerosis, and underrecognized structural, infectious, or inflammatory etiologies for upper motor neuron dysfunction which have since become routinely diagnosed with the Academic Editors: P. -
Tardive Dyskinesia
Tardive Dyskinesia Tardive Dyskinesia Checklist The checklist below can be used to help determine if you or someone you know may have signs associated with tardive dyskinesia and other movement disorders. Movement Description Observed? Rhythmic shaking of hands, jaw, head, or feet Yes Tremor A very rhythmic shaking at 3-6 beats per second usually indicates extrapyramidal symptoms or side effects (EPSE) of parkinsonism, even No if only visible in the tongue, jaw, hands, or legs. Sustained abnormal posture of neck or trunk Yes Dystonia Involuntary extension of the back or rotation of the neck over weeks or months is common in tardive dystonia. No Restless pacing, leg bouncing, or posture shifting Yes Akathisia Repetitive movements accompanied by a strong feeling of restlessness may indicate a medication side effect of akathisia. No Repeated stereotyped movements of the tongue, jaw, or lips Yes Examples include chewing movements, tongue darting, or lip pursing. TD is not rhythmic (i.e., not tremor). These mouth and tongue movements No are the most frequent signs of tardive dyskinesia. Tardive Writhing, twisting, dancing movements Yes Dyskinesia of fingers or toes Repetitive finger and toe movements are common in individuals with No tardive dyskinesia (and may appear to be similar to akathisia). Rocking, jerking, flexing, or thrusting of trunk or hips Yes Stereotyped movements of the trunk, hips, or pelvis may reflect tardive dyskinesia. No There are many kinds of abnormal movements in individuals receiving psychiatric medications and not all are because of drugs. If you answered “yes” to one or more of the items above, an evaluation by a psychiatrist or neurologist skilled in movement disorders may be warranted to determine the type of disorder and best treatment options. -
Management of Neurogenic Dysphagia
694 Postgrad Med J 2001;77:694–699 Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pmj.77.913.694 on 1 November 2001. Downloaded from Management of neurogenic dysphagia A M O Bakheit Dysphagia is common in patients with neuro- of the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, brain logical disorders. It may result from lesions in stem, cerebellum, and lower cranial nerves may the central or peripheral nervous system as well result in dysphagia. Degeneration of the as from diseases of muscle and disorders of the myenteric ganglion cells in the oesophagus, neuromuscular junction. Drugs that are com- muscle diseases and disorders of neuromusc- monly used in the management of neurological ular transmission, for example myasthenia conditions may also precipitate or aggravate gravis and Eaton-Lambers syndrome, are other swallowing diYculties in some patients. Neuro- less common causes. genic dysphagia often results in serious compli- cations, including pulmonary aspiration, dehy- CEREBRAL CORTEX dration, and malnutrition. These The commonest condition associated with complications are usually preventable if the dysphagia resulting from cortical lesions is stroke. Acute stroke is complicated by dys- dysphagia is recognised early and managed 1 appropriately. phagia in about 25%–42% of all cases. Dysphagia in these patients is usually associ- Physiological mechanisms of neurogenic ated with hemiplegia due to lesions of the brain stem or the involvement of one or both dysphagia The act of swallowing may be viewed as three hemispheres. However, on rare occasions, dys- discrete but inter-related physiological stages: phagia may be the sole manifestation of a cer- the oral, pharyngeal, and oesophageal phases. -
Rest Tremor Revisited: Parkinson's Disease and Other Disorders
Chen et al. Translational Neurodegeneration (2017) 6:16 DOI 10.1186/s40035-017-0086-4 REVIEW Open Access Rest tremor revisited: Parkinson’s disease and other disorders Wei Chen1,2, Franziska Hopfner2, Jos Steffen Becktepe2 and Günther Deuschl1,2* Abstract Tremor is the most common movement disorder characterized by a rhythmical, involuntary oscillatory movement of a body part. Since distinct diseases can cause similar tremor manifestations and vice-versa,itischallengingtomakean accurate diagnosis. This applies particularly for tremor at rest. This entity was only rarely studied in the past, although a multitude of clinical studies on prevalence and clinical features of tremor in Parkinson’s disease (PD), essential tremor and dystonia, have been carried out. Monosymptomatic rest tremor has been further separated from tremor-dominated PD. Rest tremor is also found in dystonic tremor, essential tremor with a rest component, Holmes tremor and a few even rarer conditions. Dopamine transporter imaging and several electrophysiological methods provide additional clues for tremor differential diagnosis. New evidence from neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies has broadened our knowledge on the pathophysiology of Parkinsonian and non-Parkinsonian tremor. Large cohort studies are warranted in future to explore the nature course and biological basis of tremor in common tremor related disorders. Keywords: Tremor, Parkinson’s disease, Essential tremor, Dystonia, Pathophysiology Background and clinical correlates of tremor in common tremor re- Tremor is defined as a rhythmical, involuntary oscillatory lated disorders. Some practical clinical cues and ancillary movement of a body part [1]. Making an accurate diagnosis tests for clinical distinction are found [3]. Besides, accu- of tremor disorders is challenging, since similar clinical mulating structural and functional neuroimaging, as well entities may be caused by different diseases. -
Diagnostic Clues in Multiple System Atrophy
DO I:10.4274/Tnd.82905 Case Report / Olgu Sunumu Diagnostic Clues in Multiple System Atrophy: A Case Report and Literature Review Multisistem Atrofi Tanısında İpuçları: Bir Olgu Sunumu ve Literatürün Gözden Geçirilmesi Mehmet Yücel, Oğuzhan Öz, Hakan Akgün, Semai Bek, Tayfun Kaşıkçı, İlter Uysal, Yaşar Kütükçü, Zeki Odabaşı Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey Sum mary Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is an adult-onset, sporadic, progressive neurodegenerative disease. Based on the consensus criteria, patients with MSA are clinically classified into cerebellar (MSA-C) and parkinsonian (MSA-P) subtypes. In addition to major diagnostic criteria including poor response to levodopa, and presence of pyramidal or cerebellar signs (ataxia) or autonomic failure, certain clinical features or ‘‘red flags’’ may raise the clinical suspicion for MSA. In our case report we present a 67-year-old female patient admitted to our hospital due to inability to walk, with poor response to levodopa therapy, whose neurological examination revealed severe Parkinsonism, ataxia and who fulfilled all criteria for MSA, as rarely seen in clinical practice.(Turkish Journal of Neurology 2013; 19:28-30) Key Words: Multiple system atrophy, autonomic failure, diagnostic criteria Özet Multisistem atrofi (MSA) erişkin dönemde başlayan, ilerleyici, nedeni bilinmeyen sporadik nörodejeneratif bir hastalıktır. MSA kabul görmüş tanı kriterlerine göre klinik olarak serebellar (MSA-C) ve parkinsoniyen (MSA-P) alt tiplerine ayrılmaktadır. Düşük levadopa yanıtı, piramidal, serebellar bulguların (ataksi) ya da otonomik bozukluk olması gibi majör tanı kriterlerininin yanında “red flags” olarak isimlendirilen belirgin klinik bulgular ya da uyarı işaretlerinin olması MSA tanısı için klinik şüpheyi oluşturmalıdır. Olgu sunumunda 67 yaşında yürüyememe şikayeti ile polikliniğimize müracaat eden ve levadopa tedavisine düşük yanıt gösteren ciddi parkinsonizm bulguları ile ataksi bulunan kadın hasta MSA tanı kriterlerini tam olarak karşıladığı ve klinik pratikte nadir görüldüğü için sunduk. -
ICD9 & ICD10 Neuromuscular Codes
ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM NEUROMUSCULAR DIAGNOSIS CODES ICD-9-CM ICD-10-CM Focal Neuropathy Mononeuropathy G56.00 Carpal tunnel syndrome, unspecified Carpal tunnel syndrome 354.00 G56.00 upper limb Other lesions of median nerve, Other median nerve lesion 354.10 G56.10 unspecified upper limb Lesion of ulnar nerve, unspecified Lesion of ulnar nerve 354.20 G56.20 upper limb Lesion of radial nerve, unspecified Lesion of radial nerve 354.30 G56.30 upper limb Lesion of sciatic nerve, unspecified Sciatic nerve lesion (Piriformis syndrome) 355.00 G57.00 lower limb Meralgia paresthetica, unspecified Meralgia paresthetica 355.10 G57.10 lower limb Lesion of lateral popiteal nerve, Peroneal nerve (lesion of lateral popiteal nerve) 355.30 G57.30 unspecified lower limb Tarsal tunnel syndrome, unspecified Tarsal tunnel syndrome 355.50 G57.50 lower limb Plexus Brachial plexus lesion 353.00 Brachial plexus disorders G54.0 Brachial neuralgia (or radiculitis NOS) 723.40 Radiculopathy, cervical region M54.12 Radiculopathy, cervicothoracic region M54.13 Thoracic outlet syndrome (Thoracic root Thoracic root disorders, not elsewhere 353.00 G54.3 lesions, not elsewhere classified) classified Lumbosacral plexus lesion 353.10 Lumbosacral plexus disorders G54.1 Neuralgic amyotrophy 353.50 Neuralgic amyotrophy G54.5 Root Cervical radiculopathy (Intervertebral disc Cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, 722.71 M50.00 disorder with myelopathy, cervical region) unspecified cervical region Lumbosacral root lesions (Degeneration of Other intervertebral disc degeneration, -
TWITCH, JERK Or SPASM Movement Disorders Seen in Family Practice
TWITCH, JERK or SPASM Movement Disorders Seen in Family Practice J. Antonelle de Marcaida, M.D. Medical Director Chase Family Movement Disorders Center Hartford HealthCare Ayer Neuroscience Institute DEFINITION OF TERMS • Movement Disorders – neurological syndromes in which there is either an excess of movement or a paucity of voluntary and automatic movements, unrelated to weakness or spasticity • Hyperkinesias – excess of movements • Dyskinesias – unnatural movements • Abnormal Involuntary Movements – non-suppressible or only partially suppressible • Hypokinesia – decreased amplitude of movement • Bradykinesia – slowness of movement • Akinesia – loss of movement CLASSES OF MOVEMENTS • Automatic movements – learned motor behaviors performed without conscious effort, e.g. walking, speaking, swinging of arms while walking • Voluntary movements – intentional (planned or self-initiated) or externally triggered (in response to external stimulus, e.g. turn head toward loud noise, withdraw hand from hot stove) • Semi-voluntary/“unvoluntary” – induced by inner sensory stimulus (e.g. need to stretch body part or scratch an itch) or by an unwanted feeling or compulsion (e.g. compulsive touching, restless legs syndrome) • Involuntary movements – often non-suppressible (hemifacial spasms, myoclonus) or only partially suppressible (tremors, chorea, tics) HYPERKINESIAS: major categories • CHOREA • DYSTONIA • MYOCLONUS • TICS • TREMORS HYPERKINESIAS: subtypes Abdominal dyskinesias Jumpy stumps Akathisic movements Moving toes/fingers Asynergia/ataxia -
Clinical Manifestations of Essential Tremor
Journial of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1972, 35, 365-372 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.35.3.365 on 1 June 1972. Downloaded from Clinical manifestations of essential tremor EDMUND CRITCHLEY From the Royal Infirmary, Preston SUMMARY A clinical study of 42 patients with essential tremor is presented. In the case of 12 patients the family history strongly suggested an autosomal dominant mode of transmission, in four the mode of inheritance was indeterminate, and the remaining 26 patients were sporadic cases without an established genetic basis. The tremor involved the upper extremities in 41 patients, the head in 25, lower limbs in 15, and trunk in two. Seven patients showed involvement of speech. Variations were found in the speed and regularity of the tremor. Leg involvement took a variety of forms: (1) direct involvement by tremor; (2) a painful limp associated with forearm tremor; (3) associated dyskinetic movements; (4) ataxia; (5) foot clubbing; and (6) evidence of peroneal muscular atrophy. Several minor symptoms hyperhidrosis, cramps, dyskinetic movements, and ataxia-were associated with essential tremor. Other features were linked phenotypically to the ataxias and system degenerations. Apart from minor alterations in tone, expression, and arm swing, features of Parkinsonism were notably absent. Protected by copyright. Essential tremor has been recognized as an or- much variation. It is occasionally present at rest ganic peculiarity of the nervous system, mimick- and inhibited by action, but is more usually de- ing neurotic and neural disorders with equal creased or absent at rest and present on volun- facility. Many synonyms-for example, benign, tary increase in muscle tonus, as in holding a limb hereditary, and senile tremor-describe its varied in a definite position (static, sustained-postural presentation. -
History-Of-Movement-Disorders.Pdf
Comp. by: NJayamalathiProof0000876237 Date:20/11/08 Time:10:08:14 Stage:First Proof File Path://spiina1001z/Womat/Production/PRODENV/0000000001/0000011393/0000000016/ 0000876237.3D Proof by: QC by: ProjectAcronym:BS:FINGER Volume:02133 Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 95 (3rd series) History of Neurology S. Finger, F. Boller, K.L. Tyler, Editors # 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved Chapter 33 The history of movement disorders DOUGLAS J. LANSKA* Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tomah, WI, USA, and University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA THE BASAL GANGLIA AND DISORDERS Eduard Hitzig (1838–1907) on the cerebral cortex of dogs OF MOVEMENT (Fritsch and Hitzig, 1870/1960), British physiologist Distinction between cortex, white matter, David Ferrier’s (1843–1928) stimulation and ablation and subcortical nuclei experiments on rabbits, cats, dogs and primates begun in 1873 (Ferrier, 1876), and Jackson’s careful clinical The distinction between cortex, white matter, and sub- and clinical-pathologic studies in people (late 1860s cortical nuclei was appreciated by Andreas Vesalius and early 1870s) that the role of the motor cortex was (1514–1564) and Francisco Piccolomini (1520–1604) in appreciated, so that by 1876 Jackson could consider the the 16th century (Vesalius, 1542; Piccolomini, 1630; “motor centers in Hitzig and Ferrier’s region ...higher Goetz et al., 2001a), and a century later British physician in degree of evolution that the corpus striatum” Thomas Willis (1621–1675) implicated the corpus -
Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Dyskinesia and Dystonia
Neurosurg Focus 17 (1):E2, 2004, Click here to return to Table of Contents Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of dyskinesia and dystonia HIROKI TODA, M.D., PH.D., CLEMENT HAMANI, M.D., PH.D., AND ANDRES LOZANO, M.D., PH.D., F.R.C.S.(C) Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Cananda Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a mainstay of treatment for patients with movement disorders. This modality is directed at modulating pathological activity within basal ganglia output structures by stimulating some of their nuclei, such as the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internus (GPi), without making permanent lesions. With the accumulation of experience, indications for the use of DBS have become clearer and the effective- ness and limitations of this form of therapy in different clinical conditions have been better appreciated. In this review the authors discuss the efficacy of DBS in the treatment of dystonia and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. The use of DBS of the STN and GPi is very effective for the treatment of movement disorders induced by levodopa. The relative ben- efits of using the GPi as opposed to the STN as a target are still being investigated. Bilateral GPi stimulation is gain- ing importance in the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of dystonia. The DYT1 forms of generalized dys- tonia and cervical dystonias respond to DBS better than secondary dystonia does. Discrimination between the diverse forms of dystonia and a better understanding of the pathophysiological features of this condition will serve as a plat- form for improved outcomes. -
THE SYNDROMES of the ARTERIES of the BRAIN and SPINAL CORD Part 1 by LESLIE G
65 Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.29.328.65 on 1 February 1953. Downloaded from THE SYNDROMES OF THE ARTERIES OF THE BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD Part 1 By LESLIE G. KILOH, M.D., M.R.C.P., D.P.M. First Assistant in the Joint Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal Victoria Infirmary and University of Durham Introduction general circulatory efficiency at the time of the Little interest is shown at present in the syn- catastrophe is of the greatest importance. An dromes of the arteries of the brain and spinal cord, occlusion, producing little effect in the presence of and this perhaps is related to the tendency to a normal blood pressure, may cause widespread minimize the importance of cerebral localization. pathological changes if hypotension co-exists. Yet these syndromes are far from being fully A marked discrepancy has been noted between elucidated and understood. It must be admitted the effects of ligation and of spontaneous throm- that in many cases precise localization is often of bosis of an artery. The former seldom produces little more than academic interest and ill effects whilst the latter frequently determines provides Protected by copyright. nothing but a measure of personal satisfaction to infarction. This is probably due to the tendency the physician. But it is worth recalling that the of a spontaneous thrombus to extend along the detailed study of the distribution of the bronchi affected vessel, sealing its branches and blocking and of the pathological anatomy of congenital its collateral circulation, and to the fact that the abnormalities of the heart, was similarly neglected arterial disease is so often generalized. -
Part Ii – Neurological Disorders
Part ii – Neurological Disorders CHAPTER 14 MOVEMENT DISORDERS AND MOTOR NEURONE DISEASE Dr William P. Howlett 2012 Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania BRIC 2012 University of Bergen PO Box 7800 NO-5020 Bergen Norway NEUROLOGY IN AFRICA William Howlett Illustrations: Ellinor Moldeklev Hoff, Department of Photos and Drawings, UiB Cover: Tor Vegard Tobiassen Layout: Christian Bakke, Division of Communication, University of Bergen E JØM RKE IL T M 2 Printed by Bodoni, Bergen, Norway 4 9 1 9 6 Trykksak Copyright © 2012 William Howlett NEUROLOGY IN AFRICA is freely available to download at Bergen Open Research Archive (https://bora.uib.no) www.uib.no/cih/en/resources/neurology-in-africa ISBN 978-82-7453-085-0 Notice/Disclaimer This publication is intended to give accurate information with regard to the subject matter covered. However medical knowledge is constantly changing and information may alter. It is the responsibility of the practitioner to determine the best treatment for the patient and readers are therefore obliged to check and verify information contained within the book. This recommendation is most important with regard to drugs used, their dose, route and duration of administration, indications and contraindications and side effects. The author and the publisher waive any and all liability for damages, injury or death to persons or property incurred, directly or indirectly by this publication. CONTENTS MOVEMENT DISORDERS AND MOTOR NEURONE DISEASE 329 PARKINSON’S DISEASE (PD) � � � � � � � � � � �