DOCSLIB.ORG

Archives Administration in the Soviet Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archives Administration in the Soviet Union Archives Administration in the Soviet Union Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/20/2/131/2743724/aarc_20_2_m32336mr26014327.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 By FRITZ T. EPSTEIN 1 Library of Congress HAVE never had a chance to visit Russia and work in Soviet archives. In fact, I have never been farther east and nearer to I Russia than the Alexanderplatz in Berlin. Therefore I do not pretend to give infallible judgments on the merits or faults of the ad- ministration of archives in the Soviet Union. In preparing this paper I had to rely on printed materials, which I found more abun- dant than I had expected in the Library of Congress. My approach is not that of an archivist or a record management specialist but that of a historian with special interest in the history of Eastern Europe, in its organization of historical research, and in its docu- mentary sources. A few months ago, the American Philosophical Society published a selection from the correspondence of John Franklin Jameson, who, in the Department of Historical Research of the Carnegie Institu- tion, as editor of the American Historical Review, and as one of the godfathers of the National Archives, served American scholar- ship with great devotion and distinction. In this correspondence there are two letters, of July 19, 1916, and July 16, 1917, addressed to one of the most distinguished historians of Tsarist Russia, Alexander Lappo-Danilevskii.2 Jameson had met his Russian col- league in London in 1913 at the Fourth International Congress of Historians, which had accepted an invitation to convene the next congress in the summer of 1918 in St. Petersburg. Fate, as we know, willed differently; and at the time when the congress was to be held 1 Paper read at the annual meeting of the Society of American Archivists in Wash- ington, D. C, October n, 1956. The author received his doctoral degree from the University of Berlin in 1924. Since 1946 he has been successively an American member of the Berlin team of the Inter-Allied German War Documents Project, curator of the German and Slavic collections of the Hoover Library at Stanford University, and Director of Research of the Inter-Departmental War Documentation Project. He is now Central European Specialist at the Library of Congress. In 1930 he published in Archivalische Zeitschrift, vol. 39, a bibliographical article on Soviet archives. 2 John Franklin Jameson, An Historian's World; Selections From the Correspondence . , edited by Elizabeth Donnan and Leo F. Stock (American Philosophical Society, Memoirs, vol. 42; Philadelphia, 1956), p. 198, an. 132 THE AMERICAN ARCHIVIST in the Russian capital, Russia was in the throes of defeat and revolu- tion. From Jameson's second letter it appears that Lappo-Danilevskii had asked for advice on the reform of the Russian archives. This, Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/20/2/131/2743724/aarc_20_2_m32336mr26014327.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 like many other issues in the cultural life of his country, had be- come a matter of public discussion under the Provisional Govern- ment of Russia. Here is Jameson's answer, dated July 16, 1917: The National Government of the United States has done practically nothing in the way of concentrating its archives. We stand in the lowest stage of evolution in that respect, — government papers, in almost all cases, still re- maining in the departments and even in the bureaus, in which they originated. Therefore, the American literature of the subject is a literature of agitation for an improvement rather than anything from which the archivists of another country could learn of achievements that would interest them. The matter is in progress, and success is sure to arrive ultimately; and I suppose, the longer it is delayed, the more we shall be able to avail ourselves of European ex- perience. Therefore, it will be a pleasure to learn, by and by, what steps toward concentration have been taken in Russia. Such was the situation nearly 40 years ago, when from American darkness in the field of archival centralization no ray of light could penetrate the even greater Russian darkness. Today a stage has been reached where the United States and the Soviet organization of archives stand side by side as prototypes of the most modern achievements — as, so to speak, the last word in Western and Eastern archives organization. It will accord with the spirit of Dr. Jameson's letter to report to you on the steps taken in Russia toward a reorganization and concentration of archives. I shall deal very summarily with the history of the Russian archives in the pre- revolutionary period, and then I shall discuss in more detail the ef- fect of Marxist ideology in placing an emphasis on the political role of archives that is completely alien to our conception. The introduction to Frank Alfred Golder's Guide to Materials for American History in Russian Archives, published in two parts by the Carnegie Institution in 1913 and 1937, still remains an ex- emplary marshaling of the essential facts of archival history and legislation in imperial Russia. It is important to realize that the re- form work of Peter the Great extended to the archives and that it was he who in 1724 set up the first Russian historical archives in a modern sense by concentrating in the Kremlin the documents of the Muscovite foreign ministry, the Office of Ambassadors (Posol'skii prikaz). Under Catherine the Great, in the 1780's, archives were set up in St. Petersburg and Moscow for the extant documentation ARCHIVES ADMINISTRATION IN SOVIET UNION 133 of the Muscovite central administration before Peter's reforms and for administrative files created since. During the 19th century, besides the St. Petersburg ministerial archives for different branches of the administration, several territorial archives, for instance those Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/20/2/131/2743724/aarc_20_2_m32336mr26014327.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 in Kiev and Kharkov for the Ukraine, were established. Two directors of the Archives of the Ministry of Justice in St. Peters- burg, N. V. Kalachov and D. la. Samokvasov, gave much thought to their calling and favored radical reforms, suggesting a central administration for all Russian archives, one central archives for all branches of the central administration, and better training for archi- vists. None of these proposals materialized, however, except that certain courses in the auxiliary sciences of history were introduced at the archeological institutes of St. Petersburg and Moscow, and archival commissions were established in the provinces. The com- missions remained to the end of the Tsarist era as rather powerless organs with limited advisory functions. The Bolshevik revolution swept away all that hitherto had ex- isted in the field of archives administration. The Soviet reform went further in centralization than had ever before been envisioned and added something new — a totalitarian unification. In the July 1940 issue of the American Archivist Dr. Posner, in his stimulating dis- cussion of some aspects of archival development since the French Revolution, wrote the following: The years since the end of the First World War have seen some entirely new developments. The Russian archives legislation has created the concept of the unity of governmental archives, according to which all records that are kept in government offices or have been transferred to archives depositories constitute one undivided and unique fonds. The decree of January 30, 1922, empowered the Russian archives administration to examine the files of all government offices of its own accord and, if necessary, to apply to the Central Executive Committee for remedy of conditions. The American National Archives Act has made similar, although less radical, provisions.3 These remarks clearly show that the Bolshevik revolution had become a dividing line not only in the history of Russian archives but in the theory and practice of archival organization of both Western and Eastern Europe. Incidentally, most of Dr. Posner's paper was translated into Russian and was published in 1941 in Arkhivnoe Delo (Archival Matters), the Soviet professional journal. The reform of the Russian Archives after the October Revolution might be regarded as a late step in the series of great reforms which 3 American Archivist, 3:171 (July 1940). 134 THE AMERICAN ARCHIVIST began in 1861 with the liberation of the peasants and which were strongly influenced by Western — Prussian, French, and English — ideas and experiences. It brought about in Russia a delayed victory for the ideas of the French Revolution in the archival field. Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/20/2/131/2743724/aarc_20_2_m32336mr26014327.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 The French laws of 1794 and 1796 had a direct influence on the drafting of early Soviet archives legislation in 1918 and 1919. The undivided, unique, unified State Archives fonds — comprising both existing historical archives up to January 1, 1917, and current records from which the postrevolutionary historical archives are be- ing built up — is the important Soviet innovation in the field of ar- chival science and practice. As far as documentary materials are con- cerned, Soviet archives, libraries, and museums form a unit, since the Main Administration of Archives exercises authority also over the manuscript collections of libraries and museums.4 Likewise, the authority vested in the Main Administration in its dealings with government agencies and other public institutions regarding the filing systems of their current materials and the destruction of files or their disposition in archives is without precedent in the history of European archives. There are two outstanding facts in the history of the organization of the Main Administration of the Soviet archives — a long period, between 1922 and 1938, of being directly under the highest politi- cal organs of the Soviet power, the central executive committees; and periods of subordination to ministries, before 1922 and again since 1938.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Deutschnationale Volkspartei and the Dawes Plan, 1923--1924
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1978 The Deutschnationale Volkspartei and the Dawes Plan, 1923--1924 William Phillip Bradley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Bradley, William Phillip, "The Deutschnationale Volkspartei and the Dawes Plan, 1923--1924" (1978). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625032. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-7g65-w364 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DEUTSCHNATIONALE VOLKSPARTEI AND THE DAWES PLAN 1923-1924 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. by William P. Bradley 1978 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, July’1978 G q'o rge/V. Strong / Thomas Shept>ar> arga/ret HamfYton TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.........................................................iv INTRODUCTION.................................................... 2 CHAPTER I. THE COMMITTEE AND THE PLAN....................5 CHAPTER II. THE DNVP AND THE DAWES PLAN: THE DEBATE . .2 1 CHAPTER III. THE DNVP AND THE DAWES PLAN: THE VOTE. 40 CHAPTER IV. CONCLUSION ....................................... 56 BIBLIOGRAPHY....................................................64 i i i ABSTRACT This investigation was undertaken in order to determine the nature of nationalist reaction to the Dawes Plan in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Selling Weimar German Public Diplomacy and the United States
    Despite powerful war resentments, German-American relations improved rapidly after World War I. The Weimar Republic and the United States even managed to forge a strong transatlantic partnership by 1929. How did this happen? Weimar Elisabeth Piller’s groundbreaking study upends the common assumption that Weimar was incapable of selling itself abroad, illustrating instead that it pursued an innovative public diplomacy campaign engaging German Americans, U.S. universities, and Selling American tourists abroad to normalize relations and build a politically advantageous friendship with the United States. In her deeply researched, vividly illustrated history of cultural-diplomatic relations between Weimar Germany and the United States, Elisabeth Piller charts a new course in the history of transatlantic interwar diplomacy. Victoria de Grazia, Columbia University Dr. Piller has achieved a masterful synthesis of diplomatic, intellectual, and cultural history. Michael Kimmage, Catholic University of America Elisabeth Piller Winner of the Franz Steiner Prize in Transatlantic History Selling Weimar German Public Diplomacy and the United States, www.steiner-verlag.de History 1918–1933 Franz Steiner Verlag Franz Steiner Verlag Piller ISBN 978-3-515-12847-6 GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE WASHINGTON TRANSATLANTISCHE HISTORISCHE STUDIEN Publications of the German Historical Institute Washington Edited by Elisabeth Engel, Axel Jansen, Jan C. Jansen, Simone Lässig and Claudia Roesch Volume 60 The German Historical Institute Washington is a center for the advanced study of history. Since 1992, the Institute’s book series Transatlantic Historical Studies (THS) has provided a venue for research on transatlantic history and American history from early modern times to the present. Books are pub- lished in English or German.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Bailey, Be
    224 Book Reviews Russia in the German Global Imaginary: Imperial Visions and Utopian Desires, 1905–1941. By James E. Casteel. Pitt Series in Russian and East European Studies. Edited by Jonathan Harris. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2016. Pp. xii1252. $28.95 (paper). Between Yesterday and Tomorrow: German Visions of Europe, 1926–1950. By Christian Bailey. New York: Berghahn Books, 2013. Pp. xiv1260. $120.00 (cloth); $34.95 (paper). The need to contextualize and integrate explanations of politics in an international, trans- national, and global sense has long been accepted by historians. James E. Casteel’s inves- tigation of Russia in varying instances of a “German global imaginary” and Christian Bailey’s transnational study of German “visions of Europe” exemplify two of the most popular contemporary approaches and their limitations. Although they cover similar pe- riods, spanning the traditional historical boundaries between the prewar Kaiserreich, Weimar Republic, National Socialist dictatorship, and the postwar era and founding of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic, the volumes ad- dress contrasting questions and rely on different types of evidence. Despite the overlap- ping themes of the two books, there are few indications of how their subject matter might be connected. Casteel refers to travel accounts, the press, fiction, and popular and aca- demic literature in order not merely to analyze “the important role that Russia played as an Other in the construction of German national identity and as a force in shaping Ger- man politics” but also to explore “the changing place of Russia in Germany’s global imaginary in an age of intensive imperial rivalry” within “an increasingly interconnected world” (6, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Down in Turkey, Far Away: Human Rights, The
    “Down in Turkey, far away”: Human Rights, the Armenian Massacres, and Orientalism in Wilhelmine Germany Author(s): Margaret Lavinia Anderson Source: The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 79, No. 1 (March 2007), pp. 80-111 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/517545 . Accessed: 07/07/2013 13:58 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Modern History. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 169.229.32.136 on Sun, 7 Jul 2013 13:58:54 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Contemporary Issues in Historical Perspective “Down in Turkey, far away”: Human Rights, the Armenian Massacres, and Orientalism in Wilhelmine Germany* Margaret Lavinia Anderson University of California, Berkeley Famous in the annals of German drama is a scene known as the “Easter stroll,” in which the playwright takes leave, briefly, from his plot to depict a cross section of small-town humanity enjoying their holiday. Snatches of conversation drift across the stage, the everyday things that ordinary Germans have on their minds: romance (if they’re young women), sex (if young men), and (for the rest) those eternal verities: taxes, local politics—and the Eastern Question.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2: “THE GÖTTERDÄMMERUNG of UKRAÏNOPHILIA”: DMYTRO DONTSOV and the ENTANGLED EASTERN FRONT, 1914-1918 Trevor Erlacher
    CHAPTER 2: “THE GÖTTERDÄMMERUNG OF UKRAÏNOPHILIA”: DMYTRO DONTSOV AND THE ENTANGLED EASTERN FRONT, 1914-1918 Trevor Erlacher This chapter examines Dontsov’s political activities and writings from the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914, to the defeat of the Central Powers in the winter of 1918-19. The intervening storm of steel put his prewar notions of geopolitics, international conflict, and revolution to the test. From émigré propagandist, researcher, and journalist in the secret employ of the German Foreign Office, to ambassador and head of the press bureau and telegraph agency of the German-backed Ukrainian State (or Hetmanate), Dontsov participated in the various efforts to build and govern a Ukrainian nation-state known collectively as the Ukrainian Revolution.1 Initially, he placed his trust in the peace process, the rule of international law, historic treaties, and the strength and beneficence of Berlin, Vienna, and the German-speaking public of Central Europe toward Ukrainians’ aspirations to self-government, but the defeat of the Central Powers and the slow death of Ukrainian independence in its infancy convinced him of the need for a new strategy and worldview. The First World War and its catastrophic aftermath on the Eastern Front left Dontsov more warlike, authoritarian, and statist, setting him on the path to becoming the “spiritual father” of Ukrainian integral nationalism and preparing the ground for the widespread acceptance of this and similarly militant ideas in Ukrainian politics and society. Three interrelated aspects of World War I transformed the Ukrainian national movement and the ethnos that it sought to mobilize, decisively shaping Dontsov’s thought in the process: 1) It was a “total” war, or at least the first attempt to sustain one.
    [Show full text]
  • An Appeal for Justice on Behalf of Thirty-Five Millions
    1^.: u V... AIM TO FREEDO S,0. PollocR M, HruisKevsiii^ O. Hoetzsch, |>ubti8hecli by the Ukrainian Nfttjowo end t}t,« *^ ii'! ',"n tan NfttJonal Vni-* -i. -•• York UKRAINE'S CLAIM TO FREEDOM AN APPEAL FOR JUSTICE ON BEHALF OF THIRTY-FIVE MILLIONS articles by Edwin Bjorkman, Simon 0. Pollock, Prof. M. Hrushevsky, Prof. 0. Hoetzsch, AND others PUBIJSHED BY THK UKRAINIAN NATIONAI, ASSOCIATION AND THK RUTHBNIAN NaTIONAI, UNION New York 1915 T CONTENTS. Chapter Preface I. The Cry of Ukraine Edwin Bjorkman. "HV CONTENTS. Chapter Page Preface 6 I. The Cry of Ukraine 9 Edwin Bjorkman. II. The Ukrainian Revival 28 Prof. M. Hrushevsky. III. The End of the Idea of Polish Empire 41 Carl Leuthner. IV. Position of the Ukrainians in Galigia 53 Yaroslav Fedortchuk. V. Ukrainian Aspirations in Austria 60 Dr. Longin Tzegelsky. VI. The Misrule of the Polish Aristocracy 65 Simon 0. Pollock. VII. A Galician Governor 86 VIII. The Ukrainian Movement in Russia 92 Prof. Otto Hoetzsch. IX. The Political Parties in Russian Ukraine.. 99 W. Doroschenko. X. Milukoff's Defense of Ukrainian Home Rule 106 XI. Russia's Expansion Towards Galicia 109 XII. The Czar's Rule in Galicia, 1914 .__ 114 Conclusion 120 Appendix 121 Maps. PREFACE. The European War has brought to the attention of the civilized world the submerged nationalities and their struggles for independence. Terms of peace have been mentioned, from time to time, since the war began, and it seems to be the universal sentiment that in the dis- cussion of such terms, which sooner or later must take place, the rights of these nationalities will form an im- portant part and create a new and a great historical is- sue.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Hoetzsch and German Russian Studies
    Karl Schlögel The Futility of One Professor’s Life Otto Hoetzsch and German Russian Studies Berlin.• Spring 1945. A man almost 70 years of age drags himself through the ruins of the German capital. The only thing in the briefcase he is carrying is a manuscript. He calls it his “A II” manuscript. It survived the war in a safe, while everything else he owned and held dear was de- stroyed: his apartment on Einemstrasse in the Tiergarten district as well as his unique private library with its 30,000 volumes. He ekes out a living by selling the last things he could salvage from the debris of his building. Frequently changing accommodations, the seriously ill man some- times lives with friends and relatives, sometimes in hospi- tals. In July 1945, he writes a colleague: “I am here, a convalescent in a hospital, my apartment [is] “bombed out” completely, after hard twists of fate like a fish on dry land, a scholar without books, without the physical ability to move and isolated, cut off. And despite that something inside me is working; ‘the spirit wants to inquire’, as the Psalmist says.”1 The old man illustrates more than just the philosopher’s maxim omnia mea mecum porto (I carry with me every- thing I own). In him, one sees the tragedy of a German scholar and his science – for buried beneath the ruins is also •——— Karl Schlögel (1948), Dr. phil., Historian, Professor at the European University Viadrina, Frankfurt/Oder OSTEUROPA 2005, Sketches of Europe, S. 11–48 12 Karl Schlögel Humboldt University, 1945 The Futility of One Professor’s Life 13 the field he co-founded after much exertion and pioneering work: modern Russian studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalists Between Hitler and Adenauer
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Introduction Journalists and Freedom of Expression in the Twentieth Century Journalists between Hitler and Adenauer is, in its broadest per- spective, a study of the situation of journalism and its practitioners as they grappled in the twentieth century, and are grappling to this day, with the age- old question of the freedom of expression and, more particularly, their own freedom to report on current events and articulate their views in edi torials and op- ed pieces of their media outlets. However, when conceptualizing this book I did not have in mind a philosophical study of the perennially pre- carious position in which the freedom of opinion has found itself ever since the arrival of the Gutenberg press and all the way down to modern times. I obviously needed to achieve a clear focus and to anchor my analysis in tan- gible empirical material. Accordingly, I chose what to my mind was a particularly intriguing and crucial case in point and decided to write a history of German journalism and journalists from the late Weimar Republic and the Hitler dictatorship up to developments in the West German press in the early postwar decades. As this was in itself still a huge field of inquiry, I took a further step: instead of writing a more general analysis of journalism in this period, I turned to biography and determined to look at the life and
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideology and Practices of Transnationalism in the Prussian East, 1871-1914
    Nations in Synthesis: the Ideology and Practices of Transnationalism in the Prussian East, 1871-1914 Mark Jonathan Breedon Tilse UCL Degree: PhD 1 UMI Number: U59134B All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591343 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I, Mark Jonathan Breedon Tilse, confirm that the work presented in the thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract The subject of this thesis is the socio-political relationship between the German and Polish nationalities that inhabited the eastern Prussian provinces of Posen and West Prussia in the period 1871-1914. The thesis begins with an analysis of the paradigms hitherto employed to interpret the German-Polish relationship in the region, as well as a discussion of the branch of nationalism studies concerning borderlands and regions to which this study belongs. The dominant paradigm, both in the period and in historiography, has been of ‘conflict’. A national conflict existed throughout most of the nineteenth century, featuring social, economic and political dimensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Weber Dissertation for Print
    THE PRAXIS OF CIVIL SOCIETY: ASSOCIATIONAL LIFE, THE POLITICS OF CIVILITY, AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS IN THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC Peter C. Weber Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, Indiana University May 2014 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Gregory R. Witkowski, Ph.D., Chair Dwight F. Burlingame, Ph.D. Doctoral Committee Kevin Cramer, Ph.D. January 29, 2014 Leslie Lenkowsky, Ph.D. Giuliana Gemelli, Ph.D. ii DEDICATION For Sindhuchen. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dissertations are never written in a vacuum. This doctoral dissertation would not have been possible without the support of family, friends, professors, and – I must admit – not a few innocent bystanders. All have contributed in different ways to the successful completion of an over 300-page long dissertation. This dissertation is, however, primarily the merit of my parents. They have always encouraged me to pursue a Ph.D., even one in a “weird” discipline such as philanthropic studies, and supported me throughout my studies from over ten thousand kilometers away. This dissertation would not be possible – even conceivable – without them. As a trained historian, I should start with the beginnings and acknowledge that this dissertation started sometime in 2003 when I enrolled in one of Giuliana Gemelli’s courses at the University of Bologna. It took us – my classmates and I – approximately a month to understand what the topic of the course was: American philanthropic foundations in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurozine.Com 1/16 Inner Emigration, the Manuscript "A II", Is a History of Alexander II and His Epoch; Whether It Will Ever Be Published Is Known Only to the Stars
    Karl Schlögel The futility of one professor's life Otto Hoetzsch and German Russian studies In 1946, Otto Hoetzsch called upon scholars to incorporate Russia and eastern Europe into their view of history. This was the conclusion he had reached after a lifetime of research. In Berlin during the 1920s, Hoetzsch, who was a scholar, politician, and tireless man of action, created networks of people interested in Russia regardless of their ideological differences. He founded the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Osteuropakunde and the journal Osteuropa. Hoetzsch organized and inspired Russian emigrants, Baltic Germans, and Soviet Russians. After World War I, Berlin was recognized throughout the world as the centre of scholarly work on Russia and eastern Europe. The Nazis defamed Hoetzsch as a "parlour Bolshevik", destroyed academic research on eastern Europe, and unleashed war in Europe. And after World War II, Otto Hoetzsch and his pan−European perspective suffered their final defeat in the shape of the division of Europe. Berlin. Spring 1945. A man almost 70 years of age drags himself through the ruins of the German capital. The only thing in the briefcase he is carrying is a manuscript. He calls it his "A II" manuscript. It survived the war in a safe, while everything else he owned and held dear was destroyed: his apartment on Einemstrasse in the Tiergarten district as well as his unique private library with its 30 000 volumes. He ekes out a living by selling the last things he could salvage from the debris of his building. Frequently changing accommodations, the seriously ill man sometimes lives with friends and relatives, sometimes in hospitals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mennonites Before Moscow: the Notes of Dr. Otto Auhagen
    The Mennonites before Moscow: The Notes of Dr. Otto Auhagen Erwin Warkentin, Memorial University While the skeleton of the crisis-filled story of the Mennonites gathered “before Moscow” in late 1929 is familiar, the details of those events are not. In some cases, the stories that have been told and retold have created a romanticized image of a group that decided to flee religious persecution in Russia. This makes for a rather simplistic understanding of why the Mennonites left their farms and made their way to Moscow. It is only normal for the accounts of events such as the 1929 Moscow refugee crisis to be embellished and to take on the accoutrements of a heroic struggle. Accounts such as those found in the book, Vor den Toren Moskaus,1 have left a lasting image of those brief months, where life and death were negotiated behind the closed doors of Soviet committee rooms and foreign embassies. The reality, however, may have been more mundane, a time of endless waiting; for some, the end of that waiting, even if it meant being loaded into cattle cars bound for Siberia, must have come as a relief. We are left with two types of accounts of that brief time in Moscow: the eye-witness accounts (primary sources) and academic analysis in subsequent years (secondary sources). Eye-witness accounts, of course, are not just about providing an objective account of the events. For example, in the already mentioned Vor den Toren Moskaus, a 202 Journal of Mennonite Studies passage describes the “diabolical tax system” instituted by the Soviets.
    [Show full text]