Court of the District and Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
COURT OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. IDOP.No. 81/2020 Deposition of the witness P.W.1 Solemnly affirmed by Thiru/Tmt Bench Clerk in accordance with the provision of Act X of 1873. Name : Tr. Pon Sojin Raj Father's Name : Village : Taluk : Caste : Calling : Religion : Age : Date : 21.09.2020 Kjy; tprhuiz ehd; mry; kDtpy; 1?k; kDjhuh;/ 2?tJ kDjhuh; vdJ kidtp/ eh';fs; ,UtUk; nrh;e;J ,e;j tpthfuj;J kDit jhf;fy; bra;Js;nshk;/ vdJ gpukhd thf;FK:yj;ij ehd; jhf;fy; bra;Js;nsd;/ mjpy; brhy;ypa[s;s r';fjpfs; vdf;F bjhpa[k;/ v';fs; jpUkzj;jpw;fhf mr;rof;fg;gl;l mry; jpUkz miHg;gpjH; k/rh/M/1/ jpUkzj;jpd;nghJ vLf;fg;gl;l mry; g[ifg;glk; k/rh/M/2/ v';fs; jpUkz mry; gjpt[ rhd;wpjH; k/rh/M/3/ vdf;F tH';fg;gl;l Mjhh; ml;ilapd; b$uhf;!; efy; k/rh/M/4/ (nkw;go Mtzk; mjd; mrYld; xg;gpl;L ghh;f;fg;gl;lgpd; FwpaPL bra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ) kDtpy; ehd; nfhhpago cj;jut[ gpwg;gpf;FkhW nfl;Lf;bfhs;fpnwd;/ /2/ F/tp? ,y;iy/ COURT OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. IDOP.No. 81/2020 Deposition of the witness P.W.2 Solemnly affirmed by Thiru/Tmt Bench Clerk in accordance with the provision of Act X of 1873. Name : Tmt.Benida Father's Name : Village : Taluk : Caste : Calling : Religion : Age : Date : 21.09.2020 Kjy; tprhuiz ehd; mry; kDtpy; 2?tJ kDjhuh;/ 1?tJ kDjhuh; vdJ fzth;/ vdJ gpukhd thf;FK:yj;ij jhf;fy; bra;fpnwd;/ mjpy; brhy;ypa[s;s r';fjpfs; vdf;F bjhpa[k;/ vdf;F tH';fg;gl;l Mjhh; ml;ilapd; b$uhf;!; efy; k/rh/M/5/ (nkw;go Mtzk; mjd; mrYld; xg;gpl;L ghh;f;fg;gl;lgpd; FwpaPL bra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ) kDtpy; ehd; nfhhpago cj;jut[ tH';FkhW nfl;Lf; bfhs;fpnwd;/ F/tp? ,y;iy/ COURT OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. DOP.No. 105/2020 Deposition of the witness P.W.1 Solemnly affirmed by Thiru/Tmt Bench Clerk in accordance with the provision of Act X of 1873. Name : Tr. C.Ramesh Father's Name : Village : Taluk : Caste : Calling : Religion : Age : Date : 23.09.2020 Kjy; tprhuiz ehd; ,e;j mry; kDtpy; Kjy; kDjhuh;/ 2?k; kDjhuh; vd;Dila kidtp/ eh';fs; ,UtUk; nrh;e;J mry; kDit tpthfuj;J nfhhp jhf;fy; bra;Js;nshk;/ ehd; vdJ gpukhd thf;FK:yj;ij jhf;fy; bra;fpnwd;/ mjpYs;s r';fjpfs; vdf;F bjhpa[k;/ v';fsJ jpUkzj;jpd;nghJ mr;rof;fg;gl;l mry; jpUkz miHg;gpjH; k/rh/M/1/ v';fsJ jpUkzk; rp/v!;/I bgUk;rpyk;g[ Miyaj;jpy; gjpt[ bra;jjw;fhd mry; jpUkz gjpt[ rhd;wpjH; mry; k/rh/M/2/ vdf;F tH';fg;gl;l Mjhh; ml;ilapd; b$uhf;!; efy; k/rh/M/3/ (nkw;go Mtzk; mjd; mrYld; xg;gpl;L ghh;f;fg;gl;lgpd; FwpaPL bra;ag;gLfpwJ)/ vdf;F tH';fg;gl;l FLk;g ml;ilapd; b$uhf;!; efy; k/rh/M/4/ ( nkw;go Mtzk; mjd; mrYld; /2/ xg;gpl;L ghh;f;fg;gl;lgpd; FwpaPL bra;ag;gLfpwJ/) kDtpy; ehd; nfhhpago cj;jut[ tH';FkhW nfl;Lf; bfhs;fpnwd;/ FWf;F tprhuiz? ,y;iy/ COURT OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. DOP.No. 105/2020 Deposition of the witness P.W.2 Solemnly affirmed by Thiru/Tmt Bench Clerk in accordance with the provision of Act X of 1873. Name : Tmt.Kingsha Beautylin Father's Name : Village : Taluk : Caste : Calling : Religion : Age : Date : 23.09.2020 Kjy; tprhuiz ehd; ,e;j mry; kDtpy; 2?k;; kDjhuh;/ 1?k; kDjhuh; vd;Dila fzth;/ eh';fs; ,UtUk; nrh;e;J mry; kDit tpthfuj;J nfhhp jhf;fy; bra;Js;nshk;/ ehd; vdJ gpukhd thf;FK:yj;ij jhf;fy; bra;fpnwd;/ mjpYs;s r';fjpfs; vdf;F bjhpa[k;/ vdf;F tH';fg;l;l Mjhh; ml;ilapd; b$uhf;!; efy; k/rh/M/5/ ( nkw;go Mtzk; mjd; mrYld; xg;gpl;L ghh;f;fg;gl;lgpd; FwpaPL bra;ag;gLfpwJ/) kDtpy; ehd; nfhhpago cj;jut[ tH';FkhW nfl;Lf; bfhs;fpnwd;/ FWf;F tprhuiz? ,y;iy/ In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 24th day of September, 2020. Crl.M.P. No. 3774/2020 1. A. Aravinthan S/o. Anbu (A1) 2. T. Thilak @ Thilaks S/o. Thankathurai (A2) : Petitioners /Vs./ Sub Inspector of Police, Asaripallam Police Station, Crime No. 14/2020 of Asaripallam Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru M. Subash Nathan, u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioners. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor. The petitioners have been charged for the offence u/s 302 of IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased Aji was a driver and there was enmity between both families in conducting the festival in Athiswamy Temple, Manthancadu and while on 12.02.2020 at about 10.00 P.M., the defacto complainant and his wife were in their house, there was a continuous alarming sound of their son from outside and immediately they came out of house and they saw the accused persons were assaulting him with wooden sticks in front of the said temple. The deceased Aji who fell down was taken to hospital and the doctors who examined Aji declared that he already died. Hence the charge. The learned counsel for the petitioners stated in the petition that the family of the accused and defacto complainant were in enimical terms and the deceased Aji was a drunkard and in fact there was only small wordy quarrel and finally there was a push and pull in between the defacto complainant's son and the accused persons and the petitioners are the real aggrieved persons. Initially the defacto complainant's son had assaulted the accused persons and only to defend themselves and pacify the dispute, the alleged accused persons had been taken steps and in the meanwhile, the deceased fell down due to intoxication of liquor and subsequently died. The petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners are in judicial custody from 14.02.2020 and the petitioners 1 and 2 were detained by the respondent police under Goondas Act and subsequently the said detention order was quashed by the Hon'ble Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in HCP (MD) No.354/2020 and 334/2020, dated 15.09.2020. The petitioners are Engineering graduate and the 1st petitioner was employed at Chennai and the 2nd petitioner is waiting for job. The investigation of the case is already over and the charge sheet is ripe for filing before this court and the petitioners are ready to abide by any condition and prayed for bail to the petitioners. The learned Public Prosecutor stated in the written submission that the present petitioners are A1 and A2 and the accused person had been arrested on 12.02.2020 and both of them had been detained under Goondas Act in PD No.9/2020 and 10/2020 and the same was subsequently set aside and the investigation has been completed and change sheet has also been laid and he has serious objection to release. Considering the fact that the petitioners/accused are in judicial custody for the past 184 days and also considering the reply of the learned Public Prosecutor that the Goondas Act imposed on the petitioners/accused was subsequently set aside and the investigation has been completed and charge sheet has also been laid, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners/accused with conditions. In the result, the petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil and after release the petitioners shall appear and sign before the respondent police daily at 10.00 A.M. until further orders and accordingly this petition is allowed. Pronounced by me in open court this the 24th day of September, 2020. Sd/- S. Arulmurugan, Principal Sessions Judge. To The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil. The Sub Inspector of Police, Asaripallam Police Station. The Superintendent, District Jail, Nagercoil. The counsel for the petitioner. In the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. Present : Thiru S. Arulmurugan, B.A., B.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday the 24th day of September, 2020. Crl.M.P. No. 3775/2020 Boopathi Raj S/o. Esakkiraj Subba Nayidu : Petitioner /Vs./ Sub Inspector of Police, Nesamony Nagar Police Station, Crime No. 340/2020 of Nesamony Nagar Police Station, Rep. by P.P. Nagercoil. : Respondent This petition is filed by Advocate Thiru M. Sahadevan, u/s 439 Cr.P.C. praying to grant bail to the petitioner. ORDER Perused the petition and written submission of the learned Public Prosecutor. The petitioner has been charged for the offence u/s 354(d), 506(i) of IPC r/w Section 67 of IT Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated in the petition that the petitioner was granted interim bail in Crl.M.P.No. 1931/2020 dated 04.06.2020 with conditions and subsequently the petitioner filed petition for extension of time in Crl.M.P.