DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for the Preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement for Bruce Power’S New Nuclear Power Plant Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for the Preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement for Bruce Power’S New Nuclear Power Plant Project DRAFT Guidelines for the Preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement for Bruce Power’s New Nuclear Power Plant Project April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 – INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ ii 1. CONTEXT....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Guidelines............................................................................ 1 1.2 Environmental Assessment and Regulatory Process................................ 1 1.3 Preparation and Review of the EIS............................................................ 2 2. GUIDING PRINCIPLES ............................................................................... 3 2.1 Environmental Assessment as a Planning Tool ........................................ 3 2.2 Public Participation and Aboriginal Engagement .................................... 3 2.3 Traditional Knowledge................................................................................ 4 2.4 Sustainable Development ............................................................................ 4 2.5 Precautionary Approach ............................................................................. 5 2.6 Study Strategy and Methodology ............................................................... 5 2.7 Use of Existing Information ........................................................................ 6 3. PRESENTATION OF THE EIS.................................................................... 6 3.1 Environmental Impact Statement Summary ............................................ 7 4.0 SCOPE ............................................................................................................. 7 4.1 Scope of the Project ..................................................................................... 7 4.2 Factors to be considered in the EIS.......................................................... 10 PART II – CONTENT OF THE EIS ......................................................................... 11 5. CONTEXT..................................................................................................... 11 5.1 The Setting.................................................................................................. 11 5.2 Project Overview and Purpose ................................................................. 11 5.3 The Proponent............................................................................................ 11 5.4 Environmental Assessment and Regulatory Process and Approvals ... 11 5.5 International Agreements ......................................................................... 12 6. ENGAGEMENT AND INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION .................... 12 6.1 Aboriginal Engagement............................................................................. 12 6.2 Government Agency Engagement............................................................ 13 6.3 Stakeholder Engagement........................................................................... 13 6.4 Other Public Engagement ......................................................................... 13 7. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION ..................................................................... 13 7.1 Purpose and Need for the Project............................................................. 13 7.2 Alternatives to the Project......................................................................... 14 7.3 Alternative Means of Carrying out the Project ...................................... 14 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 15 8.1 Site Preparation ......................................................................................... 17 8.2 Construction ............................................................................................... 18 - i ­ 8.3 Operation and Maintenance ..................................................................... 19 8.4 Modifications.............................................................................................. 19 8.5 Decommissioning and Abandonment....................................................... 20 8.6 Malfunctions and Accidents...................................................................... 20 8.7 Environmental Protection Plan ................................................................ 21 9. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BOUNDARIES............................. 21 9.1 Spatial Boundaries and Scale.................................................................... 21 9.2 Temporal Boundaries ................................................................................ 22 9.3 Valued Ecosystem Components................................................................ 23 10. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................... 26 10.1 Bio-Physical Environment......................................................................... 28 10.2 Socio-Economic Conditions....................................................................... 31 11. EFFECTS PREDICTION, MITIGATION MEASURES AND SIGNIFICANCE OF RESIDUAL EFFECTS............................................ 33 11.1 Effects Prediction....................................................................................... 33 11.2 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................. 34 11.3 Significance of Residual Effects................................................................ 34 11.4 Bio-Physical Environment......................................................................... 35 11.5 Socio-Economic Effects ............................................................................. 38 12. ACCIDENTS AND MALFUNCTIONS ..................................................... 40 12.1 Nuclear Accidents Involving the Reactor ................................................ 40 12.2 Conventional Accidents............................................................................. 42 12.3 Malevolent Acts.......................................................................................... 42 13. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS.......................................................................... 43 14. CAPACITY OF RENEWABLE RESOURCES ........................................ 43 15. FOLLOW UP PROGRAM .......................................................................... 43 16. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.................................. 45 REFERENCES: .......................................................................................................... 46 APPENDIX 1 – Glossary and Acronyms ................................................................. 47 APPENDIX 2 – Nuclear Safety and Control Act and its Regulations: Relevant Excerpts ...................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX 3 – Guidelines for Applications for Licence to Prepare Site ........... 54 - ii - PART 1 – INTRODUCTION 1. CONTEXT 1.1 Purpose of the Guidelines The purpose of this document is to identify for the proponent, Bruce Power, the nature, scope and extent of the information that must be addressed in the preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for its proposed New Nuclear Power Plant project (the Bruce NNPP project) for the creation of approximately 4,000 MW of electrical generation capacity. The proponent will prepare and submit an EIS that examines the potential environmental effects, including cumulative effects, of the site preparation, construction, operation, decommissioning and abandonment of the project, and that evaluates their significance. This information will be used by the joint review panel established pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the Nuclear Safety and Control Act as the basis for a public review. While the EIS guidelines provide a framework for preparing a complete and accessible EIS, it is the responsibility of the proponent to provide sufficient data and analysis on any potential environmental effects to permit proper evaluation by a joint review panel, the public, and technical and regulatory agencies. The EIS guidelines outline the minimum information requirements while providing the proponent with flexibility in selecting methods to compile data for the EIS. Exchanges between the proponent and other government organizations, Aboriginal people and stakeholders, where appropriate, are encouraged to ensure that the EIS responds adequately to these guidelines. 1.2 Environmental Assessment and Regulatory Process On August 17, 2006, Bruce Power wrote to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) indicating its intent to prepare a site, construct and operate up to four new nuclear reactors on the existing Bruce Nuclear Site within the Municipality of Kincardine, Ontario. The proposed Bruce new nuclear power plant would generate up to 4,000 MW of electrical generating capacity for supply to the Ontario grid. The Bruce NNPP project includes site preparation, construction, operation, decommissioning and abandonment of up to four new nuclear reactors. Operations would involve activities required to operate and maintain the Bruce NNPP, including management of all conventional and radioactive wastes. The EIS will consider the potential environmental effects, including cumulative effects, of all phases of the project. The proponent is considering a range of reactor designs, but
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. May 14, 2019
    ·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · File No. 94-CQ-50872CM ·2· · · · · · · · · · · · ONTARIO ·3· · · · · · · ·SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ·4· · B E T W E E N: ·5· · ·THE CHIPPEWAS OF SAUGEEN FIRST NATION, and THE · · · · · · ·CHIPPEWAS OF NAWASH FIRST NATION ·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Plaintiffs · · · · · · · · · · · · · - and - ·7· · · · · · THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, · · · HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO, THE ·8· · · · ·CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF GREY, THE · · · · · CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BRUCE, THE ·9· · · CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF NORTHERN · · · BRUCE PENINSULA, THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF 10· · ·SOUTH BRUCE PENINSULA, THE CORPORATION OF THE · · · TOWN OF SAUGEEN SHORES, and THE CORPORATION OF 11· · · · · · THE TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BLUFFS · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Defendants 12 13· · · · · · · · · · · · Court File No. 03-CV-261134CM1 14· · A N D· ·B E T W E E N: 15· · ·CHIPPEWAS OF NAWASH UNCEDED FIRST NATION and · · · · · · · · · · SAUGEEN FIRST NATION 16· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Plaintiffs · · · · · · · · · · · · · - and - 17· ·THE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, OF CANADA and HER MAJESTY · · · · · · · ·THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO 18· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Defendants 19 20· · · · · · · · · · · · -------- 21· · ---· This is VOLUME 6/DAY 6 of the of the trial · · · proceedings in the above-noted matter, being 22· · held at the James Mason Memorial Culture and · · · Recreation Centre, 47 French Bay Road, 23· · Southampton, Ontario, on the 14th day of May · · · 2019. 24· · · · · · · · · · · ·---------- · · · B E F O R E:· The Honourable Justice 25· · · · · · · · · Wendy M. Matheson Page 529 ·1· ·A P P E A R A N C E S : ·2· ·H.W. Roger Townshend, Esq.,· for the Plaintiffs, ·3· ·& Benjamin Brookwell, Esq.,· The Chippewas of ·4· ·& Cathy Guirguis, Esq.,· · · Saugeen First ·5· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Nation, and the ·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Chippewas of Nawash ·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · First Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Band Administrator the Organization
    Band Administrator The Organization Saugeen First Nation (SFN) is an Ojibway community found on the shores of Lake Huron at the base of the Bruce Peninsula, two miles northeast of Southampton and approximately eighteen miles west of Owen Sound, Ontario. South Sauble Beach Park, renowned for its breathtaking sunsets, is known for its shallow, sandy beach. It provides the backdrop for the healthy active lifestyle of this area—a popular destination for hiking, fishing, and swimming. SFN’s administration team manages twenty-one departments to holistically serve its community and provides both seasonal and year-round employment for 150 staff. SFN has a population of approximately 1,857 members, with nearly half living on reserve. They prioritize social development and offer a great amount of training and education opportunities for their members. The Lands, Fisheries, Roads, and Water Departments ensure the environment is managed appropriately and according to community protocols and policies. SFN is a vibrant and thriving community deeply rooted in culture and tradition. They have fostered exceptional relationships and have made agreements and working relationships with international partners and neighbouring communities. They are leading the way in the energy sector by being successful stewards of their traditional territory. To enhance their culture and member services, the community is creating new and innovative community infrastructure. SFN is currently upgrading its signature stone masonry amphitheatre, which is situated next to a significant historical site and is visited by thousands of people each year. Once complete, the updated amphitheatre will be a one-of-a-kind, world-class facility. In addition, the administrative headquarters will be moving to a brand-new government building on reserve in just a couple of months.
    [Show full text]
  • Saugeen Ojibway Nation Mnookmi 2011
    CLAIMS UPDATE N E W S L E T TE R SAUGEEN OJIBWAY NATION MNOOKMI 2011 Geewaedinooong Ae-pungishimook Waubunoong TREATY 72 (1854) Despite The Colpoys Bay Reserve previous promises to protect subject to TREATY 93 (1861) Zhauwunoong the Saugeen Peninsula, the Crown tells the SON it cannot protect the land from settlers, and the SON must allow this land to be opened up for settle- ABORIGINAL TITLE CLAIM AREA CANADA ment for the Crown to be able to protect the SON’s rights USA Georgian Bay The Nawash Reserve at Owen Sound subject to Chippewas of Nawash TREATY 82 (1857) Lake Unceded First Nation Huron The Half Mile Strip subject to Chief’s Point TREATY 67 (1851) Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation SydenhamMeaford River Collingwood Nattawasaga Saugeen River River TREATY 45 ½ (1836) The SON agree to open up the land south of Owen Sound for settlement, and the Crown promises to protect the Saugeen Peninsula forever for the First Nations and their members Maitland River Arthur Goderich MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEFS HOW WE GOT HERE Chief Ralph Akiwenzie wrote There is very little I can add to the solemn agreements between our The Saugeen Ojibway Nation’s the following message on impassioned words of my dear friend, Nation and the Crown. They are not (SON) territory was approximately Chief Ralph Akiwenzie. His message 2 million acres when the February 20, 2011, less than relics of the past, but rather living is exemplary of the vision and wisdom legal documents. The treaties are a Europeans arrived in the area. The two weeks before he passed he has brought to the many issues testament to the courage and dedica- British initially dealt with the away.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Conflicts on the Saugeen/Bruce Peninsula: Toward a Historical Ecology
    Fisheries Conflicts on the Saugeen/Bruce Peninsula: Toward a Historical Ecology EDWIN KOENIG McMaster University INTRODUCTION In this paper I outline current fisheries resource conflicts on the Saugeen/Bruce Peninsula in Southern Ontario. The central tension in these conflicts arises between those who support and those who oppose aboriginal and treaty rights to fisheries resources. The paper is a report in progress, based on Ph.D. research conducted since early 1995 which includes a survey of written sources as well as interviews with members of the peninsula' s two First Nations communities. My overall research goal is to provide anthropologically informed contexts that can contribute to a better understanding of the conflict issues and more equitable resource management policies. I follow the historical ecology approach (see Crumley 1994) as a framework for addressing the complex and wide ranging issues involved in this resource conflict. I provide background information about the peninsula's First Nations, their recent attempts to assert rights to the fisheries, and the conflicts they have met. I then offer a preliminary analysis of interconnected jurisdic­ tional and ecological issues which I see as central to this conflict. I conclude with a discussion of issues surrounding fish stocking practices, as an example of how this resource conflict cuts across both ecological and social/political domains. GENERAL DEFINITIONS Aboriginal rights are defined in this paper as legal recognition stemming from pre-colonial occupation of territory. Treaty rights are gained through negotiated agreements. Native rights are more generally defined, sometimes including aboriginal and/or treaty rights, but more broadly based on a perceived fairness in native-non-native relations which is not necessarily reflected in Canadian law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation, Et Al V the Attorney General of Canada, Et Al Defendants (Court File No.: 94-CQ-50872 CM)
    The Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation, et al v The Attorney General of Canada, et al Defendants (Court File No.: 94-CQ-50872 CM) Chippewas of Nawash First Nation and Saugeen First Nation v Attorney General of Canada, et al (Court File No.: 03-CV-261134CM1) APPENDIX B – MAPS INDEX TAB TITLE EX 1 Exhibit P (annotated) - SON claims map with southeast corner removed P 2 Fishing Access Map Annotated by Jay Jones 3999 3 Copy of Exhibit Q, showing Grey and Bruce Counties, annotated by Doran 4000 Ritchie 4 Map of harvesting areas on the northern Peninsula, annotated by Doran Ritchie 4002 5 Map of harvesting areas in the central Peninsula, annotated by Doran Ritchie 4004 6 Map of harvesting areas on the southern Peninsula annotated by Doran Ritchie 4006 7 Map of harvesting areas in the eastern portion of SON Territory, to the south 4008 of the Peninsula, annotated by Doran Ritchie 8 Map of harvesting areas on the western portion of SON Territory annotated by 4010 Doran Ritchie 9 Aide Memoire Paul Nadjiwan 4013 10 Grey County annotated map annotated by Paul Nadjiwan 4014 11 Map of the Great Lakes posts, circa 1763 4023 12 ASF -Bluffs at Neyaashiinigmiing 4235 13 Location of Sites Discussed in Text within or near the SON Traditional 4241 (p.30) Territory 14 SON Commercial Fishery Harvest, 1995-2018 4320 2 - 15 Map of ASF Regarding Indian Presence on and use of Land South of the Visual Aid Indian Line after 1836 16 Map of hunting and harvesting locations used by SON community members Visual Aid Exhibit 3999 is a map of fishing access points, annotated by Jay Jones.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Care & Early Years
    BRUCE COUNTY Child Care & Early Years SERVICE SYSTEM PLAN: 2019-2024 Warden’s Message I am pleased to share Bruce County’s Child Care and Early Years Service System Plan for 2019-2024. Service system planning provides us with an opportunity to explore and gather information about our community’s needs, analyze the impact of programs and services, identify progress and service gaps, and develop key directions in our journey together. A comprehensive community consultation and engagement process was integral to the development of our Child Care and Early Years Service System Plan. The voices of parents, caregivers and community partners were key influencers in the development of our priorities and actions over the next five years. The County of Bruce is proud of our collaborative work with community partners to support children and families in our community. We look forward to our continued work together to ensure child care and early years supports and services are high quality, inclusive, affordable and accountable. On behalf of County Council, a very special thank you to parents, caregivers and community partners for their valuable contributions to this plan. We look forward to our continued journey together, Mitchell Twolan, Warden County of Bruce Contents Introduction: What is an Early Learning Section 2: Exploring & Engaging and Child Care Service System Plan? ..............................2 with Our Community ................................................................. 22 Section 1: Defining the Landscape....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Triennial Report – Community Engagement Activities 2017 to 2019 3 Council of Elders and Youth
    Triennial report COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES 2017 TO 2019 MARCH 2020 A) Introduction Engagement is a key component of Canada’s plan for the long-term management of used nuclear fuel. Collaboration is a core value of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO), and we are committed to ensuring that all interested and potentially affected individuals and organizations have their questions and concerns addressed, and their views heard and taken into account as Canada’s plan for the long-term management of used nuclear fuel is implemented. As the preliminary assessment phase of the site selection process advanced over the past three years, NWMO staff and contractors met with municipal representatives, First Nation and Métis leaders, organizations and communities, key opinion leaders, community liaison committees and citizens to better understand the thoughts and concerns of people who wished to be engaged. This document provides a listing of meetings, briefings, conferences, and other events attended by the NWMO between 2017 and 2019. It describes the resources made available to communities, groups and organizations to ensure they are not out-of-pocket for participating in the dialogue. Also, it itemizes the many communication materials published to support engagement. 2 Nuclear Waste Management Organization B) Working with First Nations and Métis in the site selection process During the last three years (2017-19), the NWMO continued to build sustainable relationships with First Nation and Métis peoples in and near the potential siting areas, while maintaining ongoing engagement with national, provincial and treaty Indigenous organizations. These engagements include over 29 separate groups or communities across Ontario and New Brunswick.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anishinaabeg of Chief's Point
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-18-2019 1:00 PM The Anishinaabeg of Chief's Point Bimadoshka Pucan The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Darnell, Regna The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Anthropology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Bimadoshka Pucan 2019 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pucan, Bimadoshka, "The Anishinaabeg of Chief's Point" (2019). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6161. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6161 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1. Abstract Deep below the passing footsteps of the public, sacred Medicine Songs and Stories are held within Vault 54 of Museum London in London, Ontario. The oldest known audio recordings of the Anishinaabeg in Ontario were discovered in the summer of 2011 by Bimadoshka Pucan. Contained on wax cylinders and lacquered aluminium discs, songs and stories are recorded by Robert and Elizabeth Thompson of Chief’s Point Indian Reserve #28. Not all recordings are considered sacred by the Anishinaabeg, instead the collection provides a broad range of topics including humour, the fur trade, plant medicine, and family history. Sometime before 1939, at the University of Western Ontario, Dr. Edwin Seaborn organized the production of 19 audio recordings. The March of Medicine in Western Ontario (1944) signaled to their creation by preserving the Saugeen Anishinaabeg oral tradition of the death of Tecumseh, a story that continues to live on within specific families at Saugeen First Nation #29.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Elgin Southampton
    Sunset Point Bicycle Lanes Campers Beach Parks and Gardens Chantry Parking Lot Island Visitors Centre on Highway to 1 Accessible Trail Head Rotary Park 8 Northshore Park + Playground 15 Friendship Gardens/Amphitheatre Lake Huron Sauble Beach MacGregor Park Trail Maps Chantry Gerry’s Fries Dunes Shore Rd. Old Shore 2 Cameron Park (Baseball) +Playground 9 Perkins Rotary Park & SRT Garden 16 Lake Ridge Park + Adult Fitness Blanchfield Rd. available at Visitor Centre Gosford St. Deer Run Ct. Eckford Ave. Metcalf St. Shore Rd. Road Trail 19 South Rankin St. Oak St. Eckford Ave. Lambert Ln. Main Beach Scubby’s Hemlock St. Walnut St. Copway Trail Equipment Perkins Park 14 ElmSt. 3 Dog Park 10 SRT Memorial Garden Front St. S. Burns Ln. Front St. N. Point To Sauble Beach Millard MacAulay St. Blvd. Saugeen St. - Picnic Area 11 Turner St. 4 17 Pegasus Lookout Lake St. S. The Boardwalk Huron St. N. Bruce County Rd. 13 11 Peel St. Pierson Park (Soccer) + Playground Southampton Tourist Camp Harmer St. Beach Rd. Chantry View Dr. Thompson Ln. Copway St. - Accessible Leeder Ln. Water St. Algonquin Train Mural SecondSt. FirstSt. Knowles Ln. Huron St. S. Madwayosh St. ThirdSt. 18 Lake St. Adelaide St. 5 12 Shoreline Trail Lookout Northshore Trail Washrooms Huron St. S. Laird Ln. Grosvenor St. N.Clarendon St. Campground Biener Park (Baseball) Jubilee Park + Accessible Playground MacDonald Ln. Park Store Lansdowne St. Ottawa Ave. Union Ln. Laird Ln. St. Mississauga 19 6 km of asphalt - Parking Grosvenor St. S. Annie’s Gosford St. IslandSt. Albert St. N. Deer Run Trail 6 Nodwell Park (Track) + Playground (Baseball) Butterfly Gardens Morton Pottawatomie Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Release II: Population by Age and Sex, Dwelling Characteristics
    Census Release II: Population by Age and Sex, Dwelling Characteristics May 30, 2017. For information, contact Virginia McFarland, x1522 Data Source ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Population Age Distribution, Grey Bruce Overview ................................................................................................................ 3 Household and Dwelling Characteristics, Overview ............................................................................................................... 6 Percentage of Dwellings Occupied by Usual Residents ...................................................................................................... 6 Household Size .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Dwelling Type ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Geographic Profiles ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Ontario ................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Grey Bruce Health
    [Show full text]
  • The Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation Et Al V. Attorney General Of
    ·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · Court File No. 94-CQ-50872CM ·2· · · · · · · · · · · · ONTARIO ·3· · · · · · · ·SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ·4· · B E T W E E N: ·5· · ·THE CHIPPEWAS OF SAUGEEN FIRST NATION, and THE · · · · · · ·CHIPPEWAS OF NAWASH FIRST NATION ·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Plaintiffs · · · · · · · · · · · · · - and - ·7· · · · · · THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, · · · HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO, THE ·8· · · · ·CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF GREY, THE · · · · · CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BRUCE, THE ·9· · · CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF NORTHERN · · · BRUCE PENINSULA, THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF 10· · ·SOUTH BRUCE PENINSULA, THE CORPORATION OF THE · · · TOWN OF SAUGEEN SHORES, and THE CORPORATION OF 11· · · · · · THE TOWNSHIP OF GEORGIAN BLUFFS · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Defendants 12 13· · · · · · · · · · · · Court File No. 03-CV-261134CM1 14· · A N D· ·B E T W E E N: 15· · ·CHIPPEWAS OF NAWASH UNCEDED FIRST NATION and · · · · · · · · · · SAUGEEN FIRST NATION 16· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Plaintiffs · · · · · · · · · · · · · - and - 17· ·THE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, OF CANADA and HER MAJESTY · · · · · · · ·THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO 18· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Defendants 19 20· · · · · · · · · · · · -------- 21· · ---· This is VOLUME 5/DAY 5 of the of the trial · · · proceedings in the above-noted matter, being 22· · held at the James Mason Memorial Culture and · · · Recreation Centre, 47 French Bay Road, 23· · Southampton, Ontario, on the 13th day of May · · · 2019. 24· · · · · · · · · · · ·---------- · · · B E F O R E:· The Honourable Justice 25· · · · · · · · · Wendy M. Matheson Page 421 ·1· ·A P P E A R A N C E S : ·2· ·H.W. Roger Townshend, Esq.,· for the Plaintiffs, ·3· ·& Benjamin Brookwell, Esq.,· The Chippewas of ·4· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Saugeen First ·5· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Nation, and the ·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Chippewas of Nawash ·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · First Nation.
    [Show full text]