DOCSLIB.ORG

Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan Draft 2017 Knysna Estuarine Management Plan i DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Document title and version: Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan; Knysna Protected Environment Project Name: Western Cape Estuary Management Framework and Implementation Plan Client: Western Cape Government, Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Royal HaskoningDHV reference number: MD1819 Authority reference: EADP 1/2015 Compiled by: Version 1: Coastal & Environmental Services (2010) Version 2: Royal HaskoningDHV (2017) Acknowledgements: Western Cape Government Environmental Affairs & Development Planning Chief Directorate: Environmental Sustainability Directorate: Biodiversity and Coastal Management Email: [email protected] Date: July 2017 Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan DOCUMENT USE The South African National Estuarine Management Protocol (‘the Protocol’), promulgated in May 2013 under the National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act (Act No. 24 of 2008, as amended 20141) (ICM Act), sets out the minimum requirements for individual Estuarine Management Plans (EMPs). In 2013/2014, a review was conducted by the Department of Environmental Affairs: Oceans and Coasts (DEA: O&C)(DEA, 2014) on the existing management plans to ensure, inter alia, the alignment of these plans with the Protocol. This revision of the Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan (previously termed the Low Level Operational Plan), including the Situation Assessment Report and the Management Plan itself, is in response to the comments received during the review process only, to ensure compliance with the minimum requirements for EMPs as per the Protocol. In summary, this entailed: • Including the results of the Ecological Water Requirement study; • Providing further detail in respect to opportunities and constraints; • Providing further detail on human impacts on the systems; in the Situation Assessment Report; • Updating the terminology as per the Protocol; • Including a summary of the Situation Assessment Report; • Confirm the delineation of the estuary based on the Estuarine Functional Zone; and • Updating the description of institutional capacity and arrangements to manage elements of EMP provided as per the Protocol. The work of the original authors and input received from stakeholders remains largely unchanged. Historical information and data remains relevant and critically important for estuarine management in the long term and must be updated when new information becomes available. This revision does not represent, or replace, the full 5-year review process required to re-evaluate the applicability of the plan and to provide new information. This process is therefore still required. Nonetheless, this EMP must be considered a living document that should be regularly updated and amended as deemed necessary. Previous issues identified in the 2010 Low Level Operational Plan for SANParks consideration include: 1. This document covers the water area only. It is assumed that management of the various components of the catchment will be detailed in other Operational Plans. These should take note of the conservation and living resources goals contained in this plan; 2. The Carrying Capacities for the various zones have not been altered from the previous (1992) management plan – these would need to be verified by SANParks in a separate study; 1 National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Amendment Act (No. 36 of 2014) Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan iii 3. The tables in the document indicate the authorities responsible for the range of management actions (mandated) – it was suggested by SANParks that many of these actions would be undertaken by SANParks personnel. It is not clear therefore whether additional staff would be required – the number of staff, skill level and total cost have not been included in the tables, and will need to be added. Further, it is assumed that SANParks are best placed to indicate whether these actions are currently being undertaken by the mandated authority; 4. TPCs will need to be defined by Scientific Services, based on SANParks’ adaptive management approach; and 5. A generic list of long-term monitoring programmes has been provided – these need to be aligned with current and planned future programmes and research projects. Earlier editions of the Situation Assessment Report and EMP were drafted referring to the government departments in existence at the time. Where feasible, the necessary updates have been made or indicated otherwise. Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act 24 of 2008 (ICM Act) outlines the National Estuarine Management Protocol (the Protocol) and associated Estuarine Management Plan (EMP) template, which is to be ultimately applied to all estuaries country wide. The Knysna River estuary, however, is part of the Knysna Protected Environment as per the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 of 2003 (NEM:PAA). The Knysna Estuarine Management Plan, also termed the Knysna (Lower Level) Estuary Operational Plan, has been written in the NEM:PAA template in order to align with the Garden Route National Park (GRNP) Management Plan, as the Knysna River estuary has been incorporated into the GRNP. The plan therefore fulfils the requirements of both the ICM Act and the NEM:PAA. Management of the water body of the Knysna River estuary is aimed at achieving the objectives of Biodiversity Conservation and Resource Utilisation. This is achievable through various detailed Management Objectives designed to optimally utilize financial and human resources. These Management Objectives apply to the Spatial Zonation of the estuary and set measurable standards for the areas outlined in the zonation plan. These Management Objectives are achieved through the action plans presented in this document. Action plans are detailed for: • Conservation, aimed at protecting biodiversity within the Knysna River estuary by ensuring that the diversity, distribution and abundance of plant, bird, fish and benthic invertebrate communities is maintained or restored through ensuring ecosystem functioning. These objectives are defined in terms of a range of indicators that firstly reflect aspects of biodiversity itself, secondly are aimed at controlling human activities that may impact on habitats and living resources and thirdly deal with enforcement issues. • Exploitation of Living Resources, targeted at enforcing a sanctuary area which is designed to protect a variety of habitats and species, SANParks enforcement of NEM:PAA regulations to protect habitat or resources within designated conservation zones, existing legislation detailed in the Marine Living Resources Act (MLRA), regulating the activities associated with competition angling. • Links with terrestrial issues influencing the Knysna River estuary water area – all activities in the catchment of the Knysna River and Estuary have the potential to negatively affect the Conservation and Living Resources Management Objectives set for the estuary. It is thus essential that collaborative and inclusive governance direct the decision making processes for all Operational Plans affecting the river and estuary catchment. Monitoring plans, split into baseline and long-term monitoring, are detailed, as is the evaluation of the results. Research objectives and areas of focus are highlighted. Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND CONTEXT 1 1.2 SUMMARY OF LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR EMPS 3 1.3 MANDATE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE RMA 4 2 CONSERVATION GOVERNANCE 5 3 SUMMARY OF SITUATION ASSESSMENT 6 4 VISION & OBJECTIVES 11 4.1 VISION 11 4.1 KEY MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES 13 5 SPATIAL ZONATION 13 5.1 GEOGRAPHICAL BOUNDARIES 13 5.2 SANCTUARY & CONSERVATION ZONES 16 5.2.1 Conservation Zones 16 5.2.2 Sanctuary Zone 18 5.2.3 Important bio-physical features and recreational activities 19 5.2.4 Rehabilitation zones 24 5.2.5 Land-use, planning provisions and infrastructure 25 5.3 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES 26 5.3.1 Conservation 26 5.3.2 Exploitation of Living Resources 29 5.3.3 Water quality and quantity 30 5.3.4 Land use and infrastructure planning 32 5.3.5 Institutional and management structures 32 5.3.6 Education and awareness 32 5.3.7 Non-consumptive use of sustainable livelihoods 33 6 MANAGEMENT ACTION PLANS 33 6.1 CONSERVATION 35 6.2 EXPLOITATION OF LIVING RESOURCES 43 6.3 WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY 46 6.4 LAND USE AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING 47 6.5 INSTITUTIONAL AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES 47 6.6 EDUCATION AND AWARENESS 47 6.7 SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS 48 7 IMPLEMENTATION 49 7.1 KEY ROLE PLAYERS 49 7.1.1 Responsible Management Authority 49 7.1.2 Government Departments and Organs of State 50 7.1.3 Knysna Estuary Advisory Forum (Knysna Estuary Management Forum) 51 7.2 REVIEW AND EVALUATION 52 8 MONITORING & RESEARCH 53 8.1 RESOURCE MONITORING 53 8.1.1 Baseline Programmes 53 8.1.2 Long-term Monitoring 53 Knysna River Estuarine Management Plan vi 8.1.3 Ecological Specifications 54 8.2 RESEARCH 55 9 RECOMMENDATIONS 56 10 REFERENCES 57 APPENDIX 1: RECOMMENDED RESOURCE MONITORING PROGRAMMES 59 APPENDIX 2: ECOLOGICAL SPECIFICATIONS 68 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location and geographical boundaries of the Knysna River estuary including the 5m topographical contour 2 Figure 2: Key Management Objectives for the Knysna River EMP 13 Figure 3: Map of the Knysna River estuary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Endangered Seahorse Selectively Chooses an Artificial Structure
    Environ Biol Fish (2018) 101:723–733 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-018-0732-4 An endangered seahorse selectively chooses an artificial structure Louw Claassens & Anthony J. Booth & Alan N. Hodgson Received: 4 October 2017 /Accepted: 15 January 2018 /Published online: 22 January 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract The development of a residential marina es- Keywords Zostera Capensis . Hippocampus capensis . tate within the Knysna estuary, South Africa, introduced Habitat choice . Estuary. Reno mattress Reno mattresses (horizontal wire cages filled with rocks) as a novel habitat for the endangered Knysna seahorse Hippocampus capensis. Consistently high Introduction seahorse densities on these artificial structures, despite the availability of seagrass habitat, begged the question The coastal zone is known for its high population den- of whether this habitat was chosen by the seahorse in sity and development pressures (Nicholls and Small preference to natural vegetation. An in situ habitat 2002), and a major challenge for conservationists is to choice experiment was conducted which focused on conserve despite these pressures. Specifically, urban the choice made by adult H. capensis between natural sprawl has spread into our coastal and estuarine envi- vegetation (Zostera capensis) and artificial (Reno mat- ronments and this phenomenon has been dubbed ‘ocean tress) habitat within a choice chamber. Seahorses were sprawl’ (Firth et al. 2016a). Ocean sprawl can be defined significantly more likely to move away from Z. capensis as: Bthe proliferation of artificial structures associated onto a Reno mattress structure or remain on this struc- with coastal protection, shipping, aquaculture, and other ture.
    [Show full text]
  • Teleostei, Syngnathidae)
    ZooKeys 934: 141–156 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.934.50924 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Hippocampus nalu, a new species of pygmy seahorse from South Africa, and the first record of a pygmy seahorse from the Indian Ocean (Teleostei, Syngnathidae) Graham Short1,2,3, Louw Claassens4,5,6, Richard Smith4, Maarten De Brauwer7, Healy Hamilton4,8, Michael Stat9, David Harasti4,10 1 Research Associate, Ichthyology, Australian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, Australia 2 Ichthyology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, USA 3 Ichthyology, Burke Museum, Seattle, USA 4 IUCN Seahorse, Pipefish Stickleback Specialist Group, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada5 Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa 6 Knysna Basin Project, Knysna, South Africa 7 University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 8 NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA 9 University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia 10 Port Stephens Fisheries Institute, NSW, Australia Corresponding author: Graham Short ([email protected]) Academic editor: Nina Bogutskaya | Received 13 February 2020 | Accepted 12 April 2020 | Published 19 May 2020 http://zoobank.org/E9104D84-BB71-4533-BB7A-2DB3BD4E4B5E Citation: Short G, Claassens L, Smith R, De Brauwer M, Hamilton H, Stat M, Harasti D (2020) Hippocampus nalu, a new species of pygmy seahorse from South Africa, and the first record of a pygmy seahorse from the Indian Ocean (Teleostei, Syngnathidae). ZooKeys 934: 141–156. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.934.50924 Abstract A new species and the first confirmed record of a true pygmy seahorse from Africa,Hippocampus nalu sp. nov., is herein described on the basis of two specimens, 18.9–22 mm SL, collected from flat sandy coral reef at 14–17 meters depth from Sodwana Bay, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE SCIENCES National Curriculum Statement (NCS) Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement GRADES 10–12 GRADES Department of Basic Education
    National Curriculum Statement (NCS) Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement MARINE SCIENCES MARINE GRADES 10 – 12 Department of Basic Education 222 Struben Street Private Bag X895 Pretoria 0001 South Africa Tel: +27 12 357 3000 Fax: +27 12 323 0601 120 Plein Street Private Bag X9023 Cape Town 8000 South Africa Tel: +27 21 465 1701 Fax: +27 21 461 8110 Website: http://www.education.gov.za 2020 Department of Basic Education ISBN: 978-1-4315-3438-8 CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENT POLICY STATEMENT GRADES 10-12 MARINE SCIENCES CAPS MARINE SCIENCES 1 FOREWORD BY THE MINISTER Our national curriculum is the culmination of our efforts over a period of seventeen years to transform the curriculum bequeathed to us by apartheid. From the start of democracy, we have built our curriculum on the values that inspired our Constitution (Act 108 of 1996). The Pream- ble to the Constitution states that the aims of the Constitution are to: • heal the divisions of the past and establish a society based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights; • improve the quality of life of all citizens and free the potential of each person; • lay the foundations for a democratic and open society in which government is based on the will of the people and every citizen is equally protected by law; and • build a united and democratic South Africa able to take its rightful place as a sover- eign state in the family of nations. Education and the curriculum have an important role to play in realizing these aims. In 1997 we introduced outcomes-based education to overcome the curricular divisions of the past, but the experience of implementation prompted a review in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Lockyear.Qxp
    African Journal of Aquatic Science 2006, 31(2): 275–283 Copyright © NISC Pty Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AQUATIC SCIENCE EISSN 1727–9364 The distribution and abundance of the endangered Knysna seahorse Hippocampus capensis (Pisces: Syngnathidae) in South African estuaries Jacqueline F Lockyear1, Thomas Hecht1, Horst Kaiser1* and Peter R Teske2 1 Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa 2 Molecular Ecology and Systematics Group, Botany Department, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received 7 July 2005, accepted 23 March 2006 The occurrence, distribution and abundance of the endangered Knysna seahorse Hippocampus capensis in 10 estuaries on South Africa’s warm temperate south coast, were investigated. Seahorses were found only in the Knysna, Swartvlei and Keurbooms estuaries. Sex ratios were even and, in most cases, more adults were found than juveniles. During the first year of study, seahorse densities were higher in the Swartvlei and Keurbooms estuaries than in the comparatively larger Knysna Estuary but, during the second year, seahorses were absent from the Keurbooms estuary, and the population size in the Swartvlei Estuary had decreased by more than 80%. These results suggest that, although the two smaller estuaries are able to support comparatively high densities of seahorses, population sizes may fluctuate considerably. Population size estimates for the Knysna Estuary were similar to those obtained in a previous study, suggesting that this estuary may represent a more stable environment and may thus be particularly important for the survival and conservation of this species.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 IUCN SSC Seahorse, Pipefish & Seadragon SG Report
    IUCN SSC Seahorse, Pipefish and Seadragon Specialist Group 2019 Report Amanda Vincent Chair Mission statement Targets for the 2017-2020 quadrennium Amanda Vincent (1) To promote the long-term conservation of Assess the world’s Syngnathiform fishes (seahorses, Red List: (1) monitor and evaluate priority Red List Authority Coordinator pipefishes, seadragons) and their near rela- species (redo Red List assessments); (2) redo Riley Pollom (2) tives through the illumination and alleviation Red List assessments for priority Data Deficient of threats to wild populations and their ocean species. habitat. Location/Affiliation Research activities: (1) marshal obscure/grey (1) Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The information on Data Deficient species; (2) University of British Columbia, Canada Projected impact for the 2017-2020 promote research agenda for all species; (3) (2) Department of Biological Sciences, Simon quadrennium collate new data and knowledge. Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada The Seahorse, Pipefish and Seadragon Specialist Plan Group (SPS SG) will seize these four years to Planning: (1) priority action statement for Number of members understand and help reduce pressures on Hippocampus capensis (Knysna Seahorse; 28 syngnathids in at least three geographic areas – Endangered – South Africa); (2) priority action Southeast Asia, South Africa and Atlantic South statement for Hippocampus whitei (White’s Social networks America – that are home to species of particular Seahorse; Endangered – Australia); (3) priority Facebook: Seahorse,
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Seahorse Species (Hippocampus Spp.) in the International Aquarium Trade
    diversity Review Diversity of Seahorse Species (Hippocampus spp.) in the International Aquarium Trade Sasha Koning 1 and Bert W. Hoeksema 1,2,* 1 Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 2 Taxonomy, Systematics and Geodiversity Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 Leiden, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Seahorses (Hippocampus spp.) are threatened as a result of habitat degradation and over- fishing. They have commercial value as traditional medicine, curio objects, and pets in the aquarium industry. There are 48 valid species, 27 of which are represented in the international aquarium trade. Most species in the aquarium industry are relatively large and were described early in the history of seahorse taxonomy. In 2002, seahorses became the first marine fishes for which the international trade became regulated by CITES (Convention for the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), with implementation in 2004. Since then, aquaculture has been developed to improve the sustainability of the seahorse trade. This review provides analyses of the roles of wild-caught and cultured individuals in the international aquarium trade of various Hippocampus species for the period 1997–2018. For all species, trade numbers declined after 2011. The proportion of cultured seahorses in the aquarium trade increased rapidly after their listing in CITES, although the industry is still struggling to produce large numbers of young in a cost-effective way, and its economic viability is technically challenging in terms of diet and disease. Whether seahorse aqua- Citation: Koning, S.; Hoeksema, B.W.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT Director’S Message
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT Director’s Message Amanda in Howe Sound, British Columbia, Canada. Photo by Amanda Vincent/ Dear friends Project Seahorse I am so pleased to share some of the Project Seahorse findings and doings from 2017. It was a rich and full year, not least because I was on sabbatical from my UBC professorial post from September to December. That meant I could spend time on field visits and policy development, both of which I love. It also meant I had time and opportunity to refl ect on marine conservation in general and on our Project Seahorse work in particular. Allow me to share a few of those experiences and thoughts. Six weeks in India, the majority of it surveying bottom trawl landing sites with Tanvi Vaidyanathan, hugely supported Project Seahorse’s decision to throw a lot of time and eff ort at ending this absurdly wasteful method of extracting marine life. It’s time to target our take and stop trawling. Five weeks in southern Chile and Argentina allowed me to wallow in marine wildlife and help support the most southerly populations of seahorses in the new world. It was clear from working with Diego Luzzatto (IUCN SSC Specialist Group member) that the Project Seahorse combination of a research and management feedback loop would serve the Patagonian seahorses very well. Five weeks in China gave me hope that the country might be mobilizing for marine conservation. Xiong Zhang and I spent time encouraging better enforcement of new laws directed at phasing out bottom trawling, planning the establishment of MPAs and training young colleagues who will fight for the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology, Ecology and Conservation of White's Seahorse
    THE BIOLOGY, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF WHITE’S SEAHORSE HIPPOCAMPUS WHITEI by DAVID HARASTI B.Sci. (Hons), University of Canberra – 1997 This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of the Environment, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. July 2014 CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINAL AUTHORSHIP I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. Signature of Student: ____________________________ ii ABSTRACT Seahorses are iconic charismatic species that are threatened in many countries around the world with several species listed on the IUCN Red List as vulnerable or endangered. Populations of seahorses have declined through over-exploitation for traditional medicines, the aquarium trade and for curios and through loss of essential habitats. To conserve seahorse populations in the wild, they are listed on Appendix II of CITES, which controls trade by ensuring exporting countries must be able to certify that export of seahorses is not causing a decline or damage to wild populations. Within Australia, seahorses are protected in several states and also in Commonwealth waters. The focus of this study was White’s seahorse Hippocampus whitei, a medium-sized seahorse that is found occurring along the New South Wales (NSW) coast in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Revision of the Seahorses Hippocampus Rafinesque 1810 (Actinopterygii: Syngnathiformes): Taxonomy and Biogeography with Recommendations for Further Research
    Zootaxa 4146 (1): 001–066 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4146.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:35E0DECB-20CE-4295-AE8E-CB3CAB226C70 ZOOTAXA 4146 A global revision of the Seahorses Hippocampus Rafinesque 1810 (Actinopterygii: Syngnathiformes): Taxonomy and biogeography with recommendations for further research SARA A. LOURIE1,2, RILEY A. POLLOM1 & SARAH J. FOSTER1, 3 1Project Seahorse, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Redpath Museum, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2K6, Canada 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by E. Hilton: 2 Jun. 2016; published: 29 Jul. 2016 SARA A. LOURIE, RILEY A. POLLOM & SARAH J. FOSTER A global revision of the Seahorses Hippocampus Rafinesque 1810 (Actinopterygii: Syngnathiformes): Taxonomy and biogeography with recommendations for further research (Zootaxa 4146) 66 pp.; 30 cm. 1 Aug. 2016 ISBN 978-1-77557-509-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-534-4 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2016 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2016 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop12 Doc. 43
    CoP12 Doc. 43 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Twelfth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Santiago (Chile), 3-15 November 2002 Interpretation and implementation of the Convention Species trade and conservation issues CONSERVATION OF SEAHORSES AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE FAMILY SYNGNATHIDAE 1. This document is submitted by the Animals Committee pursuant to paragraph b) of Decision 11.97 regarding seahorses and other members of the family Syngnathidae. Summary 2. At its 11th meeting (CoP11) of the Conference of the Parties to CITES adopted Decisions 11.97 and 11.153 regarding seahorses and other members of the family Syngnathidae to take action for the management and conservation of these fishes. The Animals Committee (AC) submits the present repot on the biological and trade status of seahorses and other syngnathids at the 12th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP12) to outline the implementation of the Decisions and to provide guidance towards further trade management for these animals. 3. The large international trade in seahorses (genus Hippocampus) is leading to population depletion in some regions. Most other syngnathids are either not traded internationally or not known to be threatened, although concern is rising about the conservation status of Solegnathus pipehorses. Seahorse species are susceptible to overexploitation because of their low population densities, low mobility, small home ranges, inferred low rates of natural adult mortality, obligatory and lengthy paternal care, fidelity to one mate, and a small brood size. 4. Seahorses are often target-fished by subsistence fishers, although most are caught in non-selective fishing gear as bycatch or secondary catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Knysna Seahorse, Hippocampus Capensis, Is A
    Introduction The Knysna Seahorse, Hippocampus capensis , is a species of seahorse which is highly endemic to a select few estuaries in the southern Cape. They are listed as endangered on the IUCN List of Endangered Species. They are the only species of seahorse found in South Africa and have been recorded only in the Knysna, Keurbooms and Swartvlei estuaries. Hippocampus capensis has many distinguishing features. They have prehensile tails which they used to grip onto grasses and other materials. This is how they tolerate tidal movements and strong currents. They have eyes that can move independent of each other, one looking backwards and one forward. Their heads are shaped like that of a horse. They also have the features that define them as fish: gills, swim bladder and fins. They don’t have scales, rather a body covering similar to that of an insect (exoskeleton). These animals are protected by certain laws but still many of them are being removed from their natural habitat and put into aquariums, where most of them die, due to lack of knowledge about their ecology. These animals are visual hunter and require light to feed . If left in the dark for too long they will simply not eat and, thus, starve. They have no true stomachs and are, thus, grazing continually. Their diet consists mainly of small crustaceans; copepods and isopods. These animals are also intriguing in that the males carry the babies in a true pregnancy, complete with internal fertilization. The males hold the eggs in a pouch made up of tissues with a capillary network.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Route National Park Draft Park Management Plan
    Garden Route National Park Draft Park Management Plan For the period 2020 - 2029 1 Invitation to comment South African National Parks (SANParks) hereby provides you with an opportunity to provide information and to express your opinion, on how the Garden Route National Park (GRNP) will be managed over the next 10 years. How to make effective comments It is important to indicate those objectives and management actions you agree with as well as those with which you disagree. Each submission is important, but those that give reasons for concerns give support where appropriate and offer information and constructive suggestions are most useful. To ensure your submission is as effective as possible, please provide the following: • Make it clear and concise; • List your points according to the subject sections and page numbers in the plan; • Describe briefly each subject or issue you wish to discuss; • Say whether you agree or disagree with any or all of the aims or objectives within each subject or just those of specific interest to you – clearly state your reasons (particularly if you disagree) and provide supportive information where possible; and • Suggest alternatives to deal with issues with which you disagree. Where to send your comments Submissions are welcome for five weeks after the release date of the draft management plan and can be made in writing to: Manager: Park Management Plans PO Box 787 Pretoria 0001 Submissions can also be emailed to [email protected] Photo by: ??? Draft Garden Route National Park Management Plan 2020 – 2029 2 Section 1: Authorisation This management plan is hereby internally accepted and authorised as required for managing the Mapungubwe National Park and World Heritage Site in terms of Sections 39, 40 and 41 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act [(Act No.
    [Show full text]