Understanding Canine Resource Guarding Behaviour: an Epidemiological Approach
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Understanding Canine Resource Guarding Behaviour: An Epidemiological Approach by Jacquelyn Jacobs A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Population Medicine Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Jacquelyn Jacobs, April 2016 ABSTRACT Understanding Canine Resource Guarding Behaviour: A Qualitative and Quantitative Approach Jacquelyn Jacobs Advisors: University of Guelph, 2016 Dr. Lee Niel Dr. Jason B. Coe The overarching goal of this thesis was to improve the understanding of canine resource guarding (RG), which is defined as the use of avoidance, threatening, or aggressive behaviours to retain control of items in the presence of a person or other animal. Results from the first study, an online discussion board involving fourteen companion animal behaviour experts, identified most participants prefer to describe the behaviour as "resource guarding" due to the positive perception and interpretation of the term by dog owners, and the potential for inclusion of non- aggressive behaviour patterns such as avoidance and rapid ingestion. The second study examined dog owners‟ (n = 1438) ability to identify three different forms of resource guarding (i.e., avoidance, rapid ingestion or aggression). The non-aggressive patterns of RG, and those involving threatening aggression (e.g., growling, teeth baring) were significantly more difficult for participants to identify compared to biting aggression. Findings were used to develop a RG identification tool to ensure owners were able to correctly classify different types of RG in subsequent studies. For the third and fourth studies, dog owners were recruited (n = 3068) to complete a survey to determine factors associated with the expression of RG in the presence of either people or other dogs, respectively. Neutered males, mixed breeds, and dogs with higher levels of impulsivity and fearfulness were significantly more likely to display people- and dog- directed RG aggression compared to dogs of other sexes, breeds, and lower levels of impulsivity and fearfulness. Training dogs to "drop" and "leave" items was associated with decreased risk of both people- and dog-directed RG aggression while removing the food bowl during mealtimes was associated with increased risk of people-directed RG aggression. In addition, RG aggression had a negative association with RG avoidance and rapid ingestion in the presence of dogs; however, no such relationship was found in the presence of people, suggesting that RG behaviour patterns are more flexible when humans are involved. This thesis has advanced the current understanding of RG in dogs, as well as informed areas for future longitudinal studies to further understand the etiology of RG behaviour patterns. DEDICATIONS To Kuma, An independent, loving, adventurous pup who taught me more about dog behaviour than any book ever could have You are missed every day ~ To my husband Sam, For your love, laughter, support and inspiration through 7 years of graduate school and several different states and countries Thank you for sharing this adventure with me ~ And to my Parents, For your support and encouragement through all the years of my life I reach for the stars because you pointed to them iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to begin by recognizing the wonderful opportunity I was given to complete my graduate training at the University of Guelph, within the internationally recognized animal behaviour and welfare program. I am forever thankful to have been able to study and learn within such a fantastic group of intelligent individuals who have dedicated their lives to finding ways to improve the lives of others. Without the support of the Ontario Trillium Scholarship, this would not have been possible. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Lee Niel, for her support throughout my doctorate program. She has supplied me with encouragement and advice while simultaneously allowing me to develop parts of my program independently. Dr. Niel established a cooperative relationship with me from the very beginning, which allowed me to evolve from student to collaborative researcher and to find my own strengths during my program. I recognize how challenging the first cohort of mentees may be for an advisor, and she assembled a wonderful lab full of thoughtful and supportive colleagues with which it has been a pleasure to work alongside for the past four and a half years. I would also like to extend a special thanks to my co-advisor, Dr. Jason Coe, for his support and invaluable contributions throughout the development and execution of my thesis. His thoughtful guidance expanded my area of expertise into the realm of qualitative research, which I quickly learned was very challenging. Further, I would like to express my gratitude to my committee members, Drs. Tina Widowski and David Pearl. They have each contributed in different ways to my professional development, and I am extremely grateful to have had their valuable advice pertaining to my research and writing. v I would like to extend my gratitude toward the research assistants, collaborators, and lab members that helped with data collection or generally improved my life as a graduate student. Namely, I would like to thank Kenlyn Ramsey for her help with video analysis, survey formatting and feedback, Vivian Leung for her help with video analysis, and Melissa Speirs for her contribution to the inter-observer reliability analysis for Chapter 2. I would like to particularly thank Jenny Maciel at Kitchener-Waterloo Humane Society for allowing me to record her SAFER assessments, as well as the Guelph Humane Society and Sue Sternberg for providing additional videos. I would like to thank William Sears and Dr. David Pearl for their help with the statistics for several chapters of this thesis. Through these sessions, as well as the education provided through the epidemiology program, I now know more about regression analysis than I ever thought I could. Furthermore, although I am unable to identify these individuals, I would like to extend my sincere thanks to a dedicated group of canine behaviour experts who took time out of their extremely busy schedules to participate in my projects, just for the sake of research progress. Their contributions were invaluable. Finally, I would like to thank the members of the Niel lab and behaviour group, particularly Lauren Dawson, and my office- mate Cynthia Weijs, for enriching my life both inside and outside of the office. I would like to acknowledge several faculty members who contributed to my professional development. Drs. Ian Duncan, Tina Widowski, and Derek Haley invited me to work with them as a coach for the Animal Welfare Judging and Assessment Competition (AWJAC), and I am forever grateful for the experiences I have had as a participant in this group for the past four years. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Ian Duncan for his mentorship over the past several years; being employed as his teaching assistant for Animal Care and Welfare was a wonderful experience and through this and my role as a coach for the AWJAC I realized I have a passion vi for teaching and mentoring. Thank you for these opportunities; I hope I can continue them in the future. Far from least, I would like to thank my family for their unyielding love and support throughout my life, but particularly while in graduate school. This experience has been quite a journey for me, but luckily I have not had to do it alone. In particular I would like to thank my parents, who are incredible examples of people who have worked very hard to reach their career goals and have set a great example for me. They have encouraged and supported my educational process, and I am so grateful and proud that they are my parents. Aside from my parents, my grandparents, brother, and in-laws are incredibly supportive and loving individuals and I thank them for being there for me to provide some much needed breaks during my graduate studies. Finally, I would like to thank my husband Sam, for his incredible support, encouragement, laughter, and love over the past nine years we have been together, but particularly the last seven when I've been in graduate school. I always complain to him "I used to be a more fun person" and he manages to show me how I still am. Thank you for sharing this journey with me and being the most amazing partner I could have ever imagined. vii STATEMENT OF WORK DONE Through the advisement of, and collaboration with, Drs. Lee Niel and Jason Coe, and on-going discussion with members of her advisory committee, Drs. Tina Widowski and David Pearl, Jacquelyn Jacobs designed the methodology and conducted the qualitative and quantitative analysis for the research in this thesis. Chapter 1: Literature Review Jacquelyn Jacobs reviewed multiple databases for literature relevant to the topics of study. The literature review was written by Jacquelyn Jacobs under the guidance of Drs. Lee Niel and Jason Coe. Additional input and revisions were provided by Drs. Tina Widowski and David Pearl. Chapter 2: Qualitative Study of Expert Opinion In collaboration with and with advisement from Drs. Lee Niel and Jason Coe, Jacquelyn Jacobs designed the methodology and wrote all the study material for the qualitative study. Jacquelyn Jacobs collected relevant names and email addresses of experts for the study and conducted all recruitment. Jacquelyn Jacobs created the online discussion board in consultation with Qualtrics, the chosen online host company for the project. In close consultation with Drs. Lee Niel and Jason Coe, Jacquelyn Jacobs moderated the online discussion board. Jacquelyn Jacobs coded all data and undergraduate research assistant Melissa Speirs blindly re-coded the data for inter- observer reliability assessment, which Jacquelyn Jacobs analyzed. In consultation with Dr.