Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level
Petroleum Development Consultant Limited, Energetski Institut Hrvoje Požar April 2011 Oil
www.energy-community.org This report was financed by the Energy Community.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level
Final Report
Energy Community 26 April 2011
Contents 1. Executive Summary ...... 1 2. Introduction ...... 4 3. Methodologies ...... 5 3.1. Methodology for Energy Demand Forecasting ...... 5 3.2. Stock Holding Obligation Calculation Methodology ...... 8 3.3. Data Reporting Requirements ...... 10 3.4. Data Collection and Processing ...... 10 3.5. Facilities Capital and Operating Cost Estimation ...... 14 3.6. Forward Crude Oil & Product Pricing ...... 15 3.7. Obligation Calculation Model Construction ...... 19 4. The Role of the Central Stockholding Agency ...... 20 4.1. CSE Formation and Constitution ...... 20 4.1.1. Hungary ...... 20 4.1.2. Czech Republic ...... 22 4.2. CSE Operation ...... 23 4.3. CSE Financing ...... 24 5. Albania ...... 25 5.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 25 5.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligations ...... 29 5.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 32 5.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 35 5.5. Additional required stockholding capacities ...... 36 5.6. Legal Review ...... 36 5.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 37 5.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 39 5.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 40 5.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 40 5.11. Road Map ...... 41 6. Bosnia and Herzegovina ...... 44 6.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 44 6.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 47 6.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 49 6.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 52 6.5. Additional required stockholding capacities ...... 52 6.6. Legal Review ...... 52 6.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 53 6.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 55 6.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 55 6.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 55 6.11. Road Map ...... 56 7. Croatia ...... 58 7.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 58 7.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 62 7.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 64
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level i 26 April 2011
7.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 68 7.5. Additional Required Stockholding Capacities ...... 68 7.6. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 69 7.7. Legal Review ...... 69 7.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 70 7.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 71 7.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 72 7.11. Road Map ...... 72 8. FYR Macedonia ...... 74 8.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 74 8.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 77 8.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 80 8.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 83 8.5. Additional Required Stockholding Capacities ...... 84 8.6. Legal Review ...... 85 8.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 86 8.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 88 8.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 89 8.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 90 8.11. Road Map ...... 90 9. Moldova ...... 93 9.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 93 9.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 95 9.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 98 9.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 99 9.5. Additional Required Stockholding Capacities ...... 99 9.6. Legal Review ...... 99 9.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 99 9.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 101 9.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 101 9.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 101 9.11. Road Map ...... 101 10. Montenegro ...... 103 10.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 103 10.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 105 10.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 107 10.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 108 10.5. Additional Required Stockholding Capacities ...... 108 10.6. Legal Review ...... 109 10.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 109 10.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 111 10.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 112 10.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 112 10.11. Road Map ...... 112 11. Serbia ...... 114 11.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 114
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level ii 26 April 2011
11.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 118 11.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 120 11.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 123 11.5. Additional Required Stockholding Capacities ...... 123 11.6. Legal Review ...... 124 11.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 124 11.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 126 11.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 126 11.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 127 11.11. Road Map ...... 127 12. UNMIK ...... 129 12.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 129 12.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 130 12.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 133 12.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 135 12.5. Additional Required Stockholding Capacities ...... 135 12.6. Legal Review ...... 135 12.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 135 12.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 137 12.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 137 12.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 137 12.11. Road Map ...... 138 13. Georgia ...... 140 13.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 141 13.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligations ...... 143 13.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 145 13.4. Emergency Oil Stock Current Situation ...... 147 13.5. Additional Required Stock Holding Capacities ...... 147 13.6. Legal Review ...... 147 13.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 147 13.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 148 13.9. Intervention is Case of Supply Disruption ...... 148 13.10. Required Legal Changes ...... 148 13.11. Road Map ...... 149 14. Turkey ...... 151 14.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 152 14.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 154 14.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 156 14.4. Emergency Stock Holding Current Situation ...... 159 14.5. Additional Required Stock Holding Capacity ...... 159 14.6. Legal Review ...... 159 14.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 160 14.8. Organizational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 160 14.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 160 14.10. Road Map ...... 161 15. Ukraine ...... 163
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level iii 26 April 2011
15.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand ...... 163 15.2. Emergency Oil Stock Obligation ...... 166 15.3. Current Oil Infrastructure ...... 167 15.4. Emergency Stock Holding Situation ...... 169 15.5. Additional Capacity Requirements ...... 169 15.6. Legal Review ...... 169 15.7. Financial Aspects of Oil Stocks ...... 169 15.8. Organisational Aspects of the Stockholding System ...... 170 15.9. Intervention in Case of Supply Disruption ...... 170 15.10. Required Legislative Changes ...... 170 15.11. Road Map ...... 170 16. Regional Approach ...... 172 16.1. Introduction ...... 172 16.2. Regulation ...... 172 16.3. Infrastructure ...... 173 16.4. Examples of regional approaches ...... 174 16.5. Economic Rationale for a Regional Approach ...... 178 16.6. Recommendations ...... 179 16.7. Community Road Map ...... 179 17. General Conclusions and Recommendations ...... 182 18. Appendix 1 Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand (Data Tables) 184 18.1. Albania...... 184 18.2. BiH ...... 186 18.3. Croatia ...... 188 18.4. FYR Macedonia ...... 191 18.5. Moldova ...... 193 18.6. Montenegro ...... 195 18.7. Serbia ...... 196 18.8. UNMIK ...... 199 18.9. Georgia ...... 200 18.10. Turkey...... 201 19. Appendix 2 Economic Forecasting Assumptions ...... 204
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level iv 26 April 2011
Figures Figure 1 Planning Process Interaction ...... 5 Figure 2 MAED Model Main Inputs and Outputs ...... 8 Figure 3 Refiners Data Collection Sheet ...... 12 Figure 4 Importers Data Collection Form ...... 13 Figure 5 Product/Crude Price Ratios ...... 17 Figure 6 Crude Oil Production, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 26 Figure 7 Crude Oil Import and Export, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 26 Figure 8 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 27 Figure 9 Petroleum Product Imports, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 27 Figure 10 Petroleum Product Exports, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 28 Figure 11 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 28 Figure 12 Oil Product Supply and Demand, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 29 Figure 13 Oil Infrastructure, Albania ...... 32 Figure 14 Wholesale Companies Obliged to Hold Emergency Oil Stocks, Albania 2001 2009 ...... 35 Figure 15 Proposed Build up of Emergency Stocks Formation in Albania, 2012 2020...... 39 Figure 16 Gantt Diagram for Road Map, Albania ...... 43 Figure 17 Crude Oil Imports, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 44 Figure 18 Net Production of Petroleum Products, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 45 Figure 19 Petroleum Product Imports, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 45 Figure 20 Petroleum Product Exports, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 46 Figure 21 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, BiH, 2007 2020 ... 46 Figure 22 Oil Product Supply and Demand, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 47 Figure 23 Oil Infrastructure, BiH...... 50 Figure 24 Proposed Build up of Emergency Stocks Formation in BiH, 2012 2020 ...... 55 Figure 25 Road Map Gantt Diagram, BiH ...... 57 Figure 26 Oil and Condensate Production, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 58 Figure 27 Crude Oil Import, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 59 Figure 28 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 59 Figure 29 Petroleum Product Imports, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 60 Figure 30 Petroleum Product Exports, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 60 Figure 31 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 61 Figure 32 Oil Product Supply and Demand, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 61 Figure 33 Oil Infrastructure, Croatia ...... 64 Figure 34 HANDA Organisation Chart, Croatia ...... 71 Figure 35 Road Map Gantt Diagram, Croatia ...... 73 Figure 36 Crude Oil Import, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 74 Figure 37 Net Production of Petroleum Products, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 75 Figure 38 Petroleum Product Imports, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 75
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level v 26 April 2011
Figure 39 Petroleum Product Exports, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 76 Figure 40 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020...... 76 Figure 41 Oil Product Supply and Demands, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ... 77 Figure 42 Oil Infrastructure, FYR Macedonia ...... 80 Figure 43 Proposed Build up of Emergency Stocks Formation in FYR Macedonia, 2012 2020 ...... 88 Figure 44 Organisation of Directorate for Compulsory Reserves of Oil and Oil Derivatives, FYR Macedonia ...... 89 Figure 45 Road Map Gantt Diagram, FYR Macedonia ...... 92 Figure 46 Crude Oil Production, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 93 Figure 47 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 93 Figure 48 Petroleum Product Imports, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 94 Figure 49 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 94 Figure 50 Oil Product Supply and Demand, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 95 Figure 51 Oil Infrastructure, Moldova ...... 98 Figure 52 Proposed Build up of Emergency Stocks Formation in Moldova, 2012 2020...... 101 Figure 53 Road Map Gantt Diagram, Moldova ...... 102 Figure 54 Petroleum Product Imports, Montenegro, 2007 2020 ...... 103 Figure 55 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Montenegro, 2007 2020 ...... 104 Figure 56 Oil Product Supply and Demand, Montenegro, 2007 2020 ...... 104 Figure 57 Oil Infrastructure, Montenegro ...... 107 Figure 58 Proposed Build up of Emergency Stocks Formation in Montenegro, 2011 2020...... 111 Figure 59 Road Map Gantt Diagram, Montenegro ...... 113 Figure 60 Oil and Condensate Production, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 114 Figure 61 Crude Oil Imports, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 115 Figure 62 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 115 Figure 63 Petroleum Product Imports, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 116 Figure 64 Petroleum Product Exports, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 116 Figure 65 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 117 Figure 66 Oil Products Supply and Demand, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 117 Figure 67 Oil Infrastructure, Serbia ...... 120 Figure 68 Proposed Build up of Emergency Stocks Formation in Serbia, 2011 2020 ...... 126 Figure 69 Road Map Gantt Diagram, Serbia ...... 128 Figure 70 Petroleum Product Imports, UNMIK, 2007 2020 ...... 129 Figure 71 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, UNMIK, 2007 2020 ...... 130 Figure 72 Oil Product Supply and Demand, UNMIK, 2007 2020 ...... 130 Figure 73 Oil Infrastructure ...... 133
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level vi 26 April 2011
Figure 74 Proposed Build up of Emergency Stocks Formation in UNMIK, 2011 2020...... 137 Figure 75 Road Map Gantt Diagram, UNMIK ...... 139 Figure 76 Crude Oil Imports and Exports, Georgia, 2007 2020 ...... 141 Figure 77 Petroleum Product Imports, Georgia, 2007 2020 ...... 142 Figure 78 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Georgia, 2007 2020 ...... 142 Figure 79 Oil Product Supply and Demand, Georgia, 2007 2020 ...... 143 Figure 80 Oil Infrastructure ...... 146 Figure 81 Map of Georgia Pipelines ...... 147 Figure 82 Road Map Gantt Georgia ...... 150 Figure 83 Crude Oil Supply, Turkey, 2008 2020 ...... 152 Figure 84 Petroleum Product Production, Turkey, 2008 2010 ...... 152 Figure 85 Petroleum Products Balance, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 153 Figure 86 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 153 Figure 87 Oil Product Supply and Demand, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 154 Figure 88 Existing Infrastructure ...... 156 Figure 89 Refineries ...... 159 Figure 90 Road Map Gantt Diagram, Turkey ...... 162 Figure 91 Crude Oil Supply, Ukraine, 2008 2020 ...... 163 Figure 92 Petroleum Product Production, Ukraine, 2008 2010 ...... 164 Figure 93 Petroleum Products Balance, Ukraine, 2007 2020 ...... 164 Figure 94 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Ukraine, 2007 2020 ...... 165 Figure 95 Oil Product Supply and Demand, Ukraine, 2007 2020 ...... 165 Figure 96 Road Map Gantt Diagram, Ukraine ...... 171 Figure 97 Energy Community Road Map ...... 181
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level vii 26 April 2011
Tables Table 1 Summary of Compliance Status with Directive 2009/119/EC...... 2 Table 2 Assumed Tankage Construction Costs ...... 14 Table 3 Storage Operating Cost Estimates ...... 14 Table 4 Assumed Product Prices ...... 18 Table 5 HUSA Cash Flows ...... 22 Table 6 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, Albania, 2009 2020...... 29 Table 7 90 Days Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, Albania, 2009 2020...... 30 Table 8 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, Albania, 2009 2020 ... 30 Table 9 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, Albania, 2009 2020 30 Table 10 Stockholding Obligation According to Average Daily Inland Consumption, Albania, 2010 2021 ...... 31 Table 11 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, Albania, 2010 2021 ...... 31 Table 12 Required Volume of Storage of Compulsory Stocks, Albania, 2010 2021 ...... 31 Table 13 Crude Oil Pipelines, Albania ...... 33 Table 14 Crude Oil and Intermediate Products Storage Capacities of ARMO, Albania ...... 34 Table 15 Petroleum Products Storage Capacities, Albania ...... 34 Table 16 Emergency Oil Stocks, Albania, 2010 ...... 35 Table 17 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, Albania, 2010 2021 ...... 38 Table 18 Needed Investment in Crude Oil and Oil Products Purchase, Albania, 2010 2020 ...... 38 Table 19 Storage Tank Modernisation Plan, Albania, 2010 2020 ...... 38 Table 20 Storage Tank Construction Plan, Albania, 2010 2020 ...... 38 Table 21 Planned Costs (Storage Capacities, Crude Oil and Products Procurement and Operational Costs), Albania, 2010 2020 ...... 39 Table 22 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, BiH, 2009 2020 ...... 47 Table 23 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, BiH, 2009 2020 ...... 48 Table 24 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, BiH, 2009 2020 ...... 48 Table 25 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, BiH, 2009 2020 .... 48 Table 26 Stockholding Obligation According to Average Daily Net Imports, BiH, 2010 2021 ...... 49 Table 27 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, BiH, 2010 2021 ..... 49 Table 28 Required Volume of Storage for Compulsory Stocks, BiH, 2010 2021 ...... 49 Table 29 Crude Oil and Intermediate Products Storage Capacities in Bosanski Brod Refinery, BiH ...... 51 Table 30 Storage Capacities for Petroleum Products, BiH ...... 51
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level viii 26 April 2011
Table 31 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, BiH, 2010 2020...... 53 Table 32 Needed Investment in Crude Oil and Oil Products Purchase, BiH, 2010 2020...... 53 Table 33 Storage Tank Modernisation Plan, BiH, 2010 2020 ...... 54 Table 34 Storage Tank Construction Plan, BiH, 2010 2020 ...... 54 Table 35 Planned Costs (Storage Capacities, Crude Oil and Products Procurement and Operational Costs), BiH, 2010 2020 ...... 54 Table 36 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum, Croatia, 2009 2020 62 Table 37 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, Croatia, 2009 2020 ...... 62 Table 38 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, Croatia, 2009 2020 .. 62 Table 39 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, Croatia, 2009 2020 ...... 63 Table 40 Stockholding Obligation According to Average Daily Net Imports, Croatia, 2010 2021 ...... 63 Table 41 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, Croatia, 2010 2021 63 Table 42 Required Volume of Storage for Compulsory Stocks, Croatia, 2010 2021 ...... 63 Table 43 Crude Oil and Semi Products Storage Capacities in Croatia ...... 65 Table 44 Petroleum Products Storage Capacities, Croatia ...... 66 Table 45 LPG Storage Capacities, Croatia ...... 67 Table 46 Emergency Stocks Held by HANDA, Croatia ...... 68 Table 47 Emergency Stocks Held by the Industry, Croatia ...... 68 Table 48 Coverage of Days of Consumption, Croatia ...... 68 Table 49 Croatian Capacity Requirements ...... 69 Table 50 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, FYR Macedonia, 2009 2020 ...... 77 Table 51 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, FYR Macedonia, 2009 2020 ...... 78 Table 52 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, FYR Macedonia, 2009 2020 ...... 78 Table 53 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, FYR Macedonia, 2009 2020...... 78 Table 54 Stockholding Obligations According to Average Daily Net Imports, FYR Macedonia, 2010 2021 ...... 79 Table 55 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, FYR Macedonia, 2010 2021...... 79 Table 56 Required Volume of Storage for Compulsory Stocks, FYR Macedonia, 2010 2021 ...... 79 Table 57 Petroleum Products Storage Capacities, FYR Macedonia ...... 82 Table 58 Emergency Stocks Held by OKTA Refinery, FYR Macedonia ...... 83 Table 59 Emergency Stocks Held by Makpetrol, FYR Macedonia ...... 83 Table 60 Emergency Stocks Held by Lukoil, FYR Macedonia ...... 83 Table 61 Total Quantity of Emergency Stocks held in FYR Macedonia ...... 83 Table 62 Coverage of Days of Consumption, FYR Macedonia ...... 84
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level ix 26 April 2011
Table 63 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, FYR Macedonia, 2010 2021 ...... 87 Table 64 Needed Investment in Crude Oil and Products Purchase, FYR Macedonia, 2010 2020 ...... 87 Table 65 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, Moldova, 2008 2020...... 95 Table 66 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, Moldova, 2008 2020 ...... 96 Table 67 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, Moldova, 2008 2020 96 Table 68 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, Moldova, 2008 2020 ...... 96 Table 69 Stockholding Obligations According to Average Daily Net Imports, Moldova, 2009 2021 ...... 97 Table 70 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, Moldova, 2009 2021 ...... 97 Table 71 Required Volume of Storage for Compulsory Stocks, Moldova, 2009 2021 ...... 97 Table 72 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage Capacities Construction, Moldova, 2010 2020 ...... 99 Table 73 Needed Investment in Crude Oil and Products Purchase, Moldova, 2010 2020...... 100 Table 74 Storage Tank Construction Plan, Moldova, 2010 2020 ...... 100 Table 75 Planned Costs (Storage Capacities, Crude Oil and Products Procurement and Operational Costs), Moldova, 2010 2020 ...... 100 Table 76 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, Montenegro 2009 2020...... 105 Table 77 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, Montenegro, 2009 2020 ...... 105 Table 78 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, Montenegro, 2009 2020 ...... 106 Table 79 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, Montenegro, 2009 2020 ...... 106 Table 80 Stockholding Obligations According to Average Daily Net Imports, Montenegro, 2010 2021 ...... 106 Table 81 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, Montenegro, 2010 2021 ...... 106 Table 82 Required Volume of Storage for Compulsory Stocks, Montenegro, 2010 2021...... 107 Table 83 Petroleum Products Storage Capacities, Montenegro ...... 108 Table 84 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, Montenegro, 2010 2020 ...... 110 Table 85 Needed Investment in Oil Products Purchase, Montenegro, 2010 2020 ...... 110 Table 86 Storage Tank Modernisation Plan, Montenegro, 2010 2020 ...... 110 Table 87 Storage Tank Construction Plan, Montenegro, 2010 2020 ...... 111
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level x 26 April 2011
Table 88 Planned Costs (Storage Capacities, Crude Oil and Products Procurement and Operational Costs), Montenegro, 2010 2020 ...... 111 Table 89 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, Serbia, 2009 2020...... 118 Table 90 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, Serbia, 2009 2020 ...... 118 Table 91 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, Serbia, 2009 2020 . 119 Table 92 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, Serbia, 2009 2020 ...... 119 Table 93 Stockholding Obligation According to Average Daily Net Imports, Serbia, 2010 2021 ...... 119 Table 94 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, Serbia, 2010 2021 ...... 119 Table 95 Required Volume of Storage of Compulsory Stocks, Serbia, 2010 2021 ...... 120 Table 96 Transnafta Pipeline Transportation System, Serbia ...... 121 Table 97 Crude Oil and Semi Products Storage Capacity, Serbia ...... 121 Table 98 Petroleum Products Storage Capacities, Serbia ...... 122 Table 99 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, Serbia, 2010 2021 ...... 125 Table 100 Required Investment in Oil Product Purchases, Serbia, 2010 2020 ...... 125 Table 101 Storage Tank Construction Plan, Serbia, 2010 2020 ...... 125 Table 102 Planned Costs (Storage Capacities, Crude Oil and Products Procurement and Operational Costs), Serbia, 2010 2020 ...... 125 Table 103 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, UNMIK, 2009 2020...... 131 Table 104 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, UNMIK, 2009 2020 ...... 131 Table 105 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, UNMIK, 2009 2020 ...... 131 Table 106 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, UNMIK, 2009 2020 ...... 132 Table 107 Stockholding Obligation According to Average Daily Net Imports, UNMIK, 2010 2021 ...... 132 Table 108 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, UNMIK, 2010 2021 ...... 132 Table 109 Required Volume of Storage for Compulsory Stocks, UNMIK, 2010 2021 ...... 132 Table 110 Storage Capacities for Oil Products ...... 134 Table 111 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, UNMIK, 2010 2021 ...... 136 Table 112 Needed Investment in Oil Products Purchase, UNMIK, 2010 2020 ...... 136 Table 113 Storage Tank Modernisation Plan, UNMIK, 2010 2020 ...... 136 Table 114 Storage Tank Construction Plan, UNMIK, 2010 2020 ...... 136
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level xi 26 April 2011
Table 115 Planned Costs (Storage Capacities, Crude Oil and Products Procurement and Operational Costs), UNMIK, 2010 2020 ...... 136 Table 116 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, Georgia, 2009 2020...... 143 Table 117 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, Georgia, 2009 2020 ...... 144 Table 118 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, Georgia, 2009 2020 ...... 144 Table 119 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, Georgia, 2009 2020 ...... 144 Table 120 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, Georgia, 2010 2020 ...... 145 Table 121 Required Volume of Storage of Compulsory Stocks, Georgia, 2010 2021 ...... 145 Table 122 Georgia Storage Capacity ...... 146 Table 123 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, Georgia, 2010 2020 ...... 148 Table 124 Georgia Oil Product Purchase ...... 148 Table 125 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, Turkey, 2009 2020...... 154 Table 126 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, Turkey, 2009 2020 ...... 155 Table 127 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, Turkey, 2009 2020 ...... 155 Table 128 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, Turkey, 2009 2020 ...... 155 Table 129 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, Turkey, 2009 2020 ...... 156 Table 130 Required Volume of Storage of Compulsory Stocks, Turkey, 2009 2020 ...... 156 Table 131 Storage Capacity ...... 157 Table 132 Turkish Industry Stock Holding Requirements ...... 159 Table 133 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, Turkey, 2010 2020 ...... 160 Table 134 Crude Oil Equivalent of Imports of Petroleum Products, Ukraine, 2009 2020...... 166 Table 135 90 Days of Daily Net Imports of Crude Oil and Petroleum Products, Ukraine, 2009 2020 ...... 166 Table 136 Crude Oil Equivalent of Inland Consumption, Ukraine, 2009 2020 ...... 166 Table 137 61 Days of Average Daily Inland Consumption, Ukraine, 2009 2020 ...... 167 Table 138 Proposed Composition of Compulsory Stocks, Ukraine, 2009 2020 ...... 167 Table 139 Required Volume of Storage of Compulsory Stocks, Ukraine, 2009 2020 ...... 167
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level xii 26 April 2011
Table 140 Ukraine Ports & Terminals ...... 167 Table 141 Storage Capacity ...... 168 Table 142 Refineries ...... 168 Table 143 Required Volume and Corresponding Investments in Storage, Ukraine 2010 2020 ...... 169 Table 144 Commodity Purchase Capital Expenditure, Ukraine ...... 169 Table 145 EU Bilateral Emergency Oil Stocks Agreements ...... 175 Table 146 Oil Production, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 184 Table 147 Crude Oil Import and Export, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 184 Table 148 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 184 Table 149 Refinery Own Use, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 184 Table 150 Petroleum Product Imports, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 184 Table 151 Petroleum Product Exports, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 185 Table 152 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Albania, 2007 2020 ...... 185 Table 153 Crude Oil Import, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 186 Table 154 Net Production of Petroleum Products, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 186 Table 155 Refinery Own Use, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 186 Table 156 Petroleum Product Imports, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 186 Table 157 Petroleum Product Exports, BiH, 2007 2020 ...... 187 Table 158 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, BiH, 2007 2020 187 Table 159 Oil and Condensate Production, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 188 Table 160 Crude Oil Import, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 188 Table 161 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 188 Table 162 Refinery Own Use, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 188 Table 163 Petroleum Product Imports, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 189 Table 164 Petroleum Product Exports, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 189 Table 165 International Bunkers, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 189 Table 166 Stock Changes, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 190 Table 167 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Croatia, 2007 2020 ...... 190 Table 168 Crude Oil Import, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 191 Table 169 Net production of Petroleum Products, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 191 Table 170 Refinery Own Use, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 191 Table 171 Petroleum Product Imports, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 191 Table 172 Petroleum Product Exports, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020...... 192 Table 173 Stock Changes, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020 ...... 192 Table 174 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, FYR Macedonia, 2007 2020...... 192 Table 175 Crude Oil Production, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 193 Table 176 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Moldova, 2007 2020 ..... 193 Table 177 Petroleum Product Imports, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 193 Table 178 Petroleum Product Exports, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 194 Table 179 Stock Changes, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 194
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level xiii 26 April 2011
Table 180 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Moldova, 2007 2020 ...... 194 Table 181 Petroleum Product Imports, Montenegro, 2007 2020 ...... 195 Table 182 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Montenegro, 2007 2020 ...... 195 Table 183 Oil and Condensate Production, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 196 Table 184 Crude Oil Import, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 196 Table 185 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Serbia, 2007 2020...... 196 Table 186 Refinery Own Use, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 196 Table 187 Petroleum Product Imports, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 197 Table 188 Petroleum Product Exports, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 197 Table 189 Stock Changes, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 197 Table 190 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Serbia, 2007 2020 ...... 198 Table 191 Petroleum Product Imports, UNMIK, 2007 2020 ...... 199 Table 192 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, UNMIK, 2007 2020 ...... 199 Table 193 Georgia Petroleum Product Consumption, 2007 2020 ...... 200 Table 194 Georgian Domestic Petroleum Product Import, 2007 2020...... 200 Table 195 Oil and Condensate Production, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 201 Table 196 Crude Oil Import, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 201 Table 197 Net Production of Petroleum Products, Serbia, 2007 2020...... 201 Table 198 Refinery Own Use, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 201 Table 199 Petroleum Product Imports, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 202 Table 200 Petroleum Product Exports, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 202 Table 201 Domestic Consumption of Petroleum Products, Turkey, 2007 2020 ...... 202 Table 202 GDP Data Used in Economic Forecasting ...... 204 Table 203 Albania MAED Inputs ...... 205 Table 204 MAED Inputs BiH ...... 206 Table 205 MAED Inputs Croatia ...... 207 Table 206 MAED Inputs FYR Macedonia ...... 208 Table 207 MAED Inputs Moldova ...... 209 Table 208 MAED Inputs Montenegro ...... 210 Table 209 MAED Inputs Serbia ...... 211 Table 210 MAED Inputs UNMIK ...... 212
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level xiv 26 April 2011
Abbreviations
€ Euro APETRA The Belgian stockholding agency API American Petroleum Institute ARA Antwerp, Rotterdam, Amsterdam ARMO Albanian Refining and Marketing of Oil ASMR The Czech Administration of State Material Reserves bbl barrel BE Belgium BiH Bosnia and Herzegovina BTC Baku Tbilisi Ceyan CHEM chemicals CIA Central Intelligence Agency cif cost, insurance, freight CP Contracting Parties CSE Central Stockholding Entity (or Agency) CY Cyprus CZ Czech Republic DE Germany DK Denmark DORS Downstream Oil Reporting System dwt dead weight tonnage EC European Commission EIHP Energy Institute Hrvoye Pozar EE Estonia EL Greece EN590 European Norm 590, a standard European grade of diesel fuel ES Spain EU European Union FI Finland FO fuel oil fob free on board FR France FYR Former Yugoslav Republic GIFP Giurgiulesti International Free Port HANDA The Croatian stockholding agency HRK Croatian Kuna HU Hungary HUSA The Hungarian Association of Crude Oil and Oil Products Stockpiling IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level xv 26 April 2011
IE Ireland IEA International Energy Agency IEJE Institute Economique et Juridique de l′Energie INA Industrija Nafte d. d., a Croatian oil company IT Italy JANAF Jadranski naftovod, a Croatian pipeline company JP 4 A type of naphtha based jet fuel, also “Jet Propellant” JP Transnafta A Serbian pipeline company KKKSz The former Hungarian Association of Crude Oil and Oil Products Stockpiling, now called HUSA km kilometre kt/y thousand tonnes per year l litre LPG liquefied petroleum gas LT Lithuania LU Luxembourg LV Latvia m3 cubic metre MAED Model for Analysis of Energy Demand Med Mediterranean MEDEE Modele d’Evolution de la Demande d’Energie – a sectoral end use type energy demand model MESSAGE Model for Energy Supply Strategy Alternatives and their General Environmental Impact MKD Macedonia Denar MOL Magyar Olaj és Gázipari, an Hungarian oil & gas company MT Malta Mt/y million tonnes per year NESO The Turkish National Emergency Sharing Organisation NGL natural gas liquid NIS Naftna Industrija Srbije, a Serbian oil company NL Netherlands NORA National Oil Reserves Agency (in Ireland) OKTA An oil refinery in the Macedonia, owned by Hellenic Petroleum OMV Österreichischen Mineralölverwaltung Aktiengesellschaft, an Austrian oil company PET petroleum products PPRS Petroleum Production Reporting System prsn person PT Portugal RSD Serbian Dinar
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level xvi 26 April 2011
SE Sweden SI Slovenia SK Slovak Republic SOCAR State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic t tonnes tkm Tonne kilometre TNK BP Company formed by the merger of British Petroleum’s Russian oil and gas assets and the oil and gas assets of Alfa, Access/Renova group, the latter being known as Tyumen Nefte Kompany (Tyumen Oil Company) toe tonnes of oil equivalent UL95 Unleaded 95, unleaded gasoline with a research octane number of 95 UK United Kingdom (of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) UNMIK United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo US$ United States dollar VEG vegetable oils
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level xvii 26 April 2011
1. Executive Summary This is the Final Report for the study on Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level.
The study has found:
• All the Beneficiaries need, to some extent, to enhance their crude oil and petroleum product stockholding systems in order to be in compliance with EU Directive 2009/119/EC.
• All Beneficiaries need to make some changes to their legal and regulatory framework to comply with the Directive.
• There are issues in most countries concerning the monitoring and transparent reporting of emergency stockholding and that regulations and systems will need to be developed in order to be compliant with the Directive.
• Most Beneficiaries should be able to become compliant with the Directive by 2020 through the adoption of a phased programme of changes and investment
This report is based on analysis and benchmarking of the information gathered from the Beneficiaries. A summary of the findings is shown in Table 1.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 1 26 April 2011
Table 1 Summary of Compliance Status with Directive 2009/119/EC
Total Legislative changes Required Volume (thousand m 3) Required Investments (Million €) Investment CSE status required (Million €) Beneficiary Purchase of New storage Storage New storage Storage crude oil and 2011-2020 construction modernisation construction modernisation products Albania 97 140 21.0 13.4 91.9 126.3 Needs to be set up Minor Bosnia and 374 182 86.2 16.8 212.0 126.3 Needs to be set up Moderate Herzegovina Croatia 600* A more detailed study has been carried out by HANDA HANDA in operation Minor
FYR Macedonia 244* 50.0 80.0 130.0 Directorate in place Minor
Major – no relevant laws Moldova 327* 78.0 130.0 208.0 Needs to be set up in place
Montenegro 38.8 67.2 9.3 6.5 60.0 75.8 Needs to be set up Moderate
Government Serbia 837.0* 172.0 370.0 542.0 department fulfilling Moderate the role Major UNMIK 223.0 34.0 53.5 3.3 100.0 156.8 Needs to be s et up
Major – no relevant laws Georgia 906.0* 218.0 359.0 247.2 Needs to be set up in place
Believed to be moderate Turkey 11,500.0* 2,750.0 4,800.0 7,550.0 NESO in operation and underway Ukraine 9,225* 2,200.0 3,300.0 5,500.0 Data withh eld
*Indicates a requirement to build new facilities but does not include possible utilisation of existing storage facilities
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 2 26 April 2011
In the course of the study the Consultant came to the following conclusions:
• Data reporting in general needs to improve for technical compliance to be achieved under the Directive
• The Beneficiaries are more inclined to setting up Central Stockholding Entities rather than obligating operating companies which, when tried, has caused reporting and compliance issues
• There are concerns about the costs of compliance with the Directive and there is a growing of awareness of the significant planning required to ensure compliance in terms of regulation, reporting and physical stockholding
• There are strong reasons for considering a regional approach to Emergency Oil Stockholding in terms of cost minimisation but significant further analysis and negotiation would be required to implement such a regional approach
• In order to increase security of oil supply in the region the Consultant recommends establishment of a Coordination Entity for oil and petroleum products consisting of representatives of the Beneficiaries and chaired by the Energy Community. The main tasks of the Coordination Entity would be monitoring of oil market and establishment of coordinated emergency response procedures.
• All the Beneficiaries have a realistic chance of being compliant with the Directive by 2020.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 3 26 April 2011
2. Introduction This is the Final Report for the study on Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level.
The study covered the eight Contracting Parties (CP) of the Energy Community (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, FYR of Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Serbia and UNMIK) and three Observer countries (Georgia, Turkey and Ukraine), further called "Beneficiaries".
Petroleum Development Consultants (PDC) conducted this study with the Energy Institute Hrvoye Pozar (EIHP) of Croatia.
The key objectives of this study were:
• Recommendations on the crude oil and petroleum product stockholding systems for the Beneficiaries, in accordance with EU Directive 2009/119/EC
• Determine at a high level the stock holding obligation and costs for each Beneficiary in the time frame of 2011 to 2020
• The development of a work programme for compliance with Directive 2009/119/EC by the Contracting Parties
• Identification of issues and problems facing the Beneficiaries in achieving compliance with the Directive and the development of proposed solutions
• Examine the possibility of a regional approach to coordinating stock holding activities
The analysis and benchmarking in this study was heavily reliant on information gathered from and provided by the Beneficiaries. The findings of the study were presented to the Beneficiaries at a meeting in Vienna on 1 March 2011 and comments and feedback received subsequently have been included in this Final Report.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 4 26 April 2011
3. Methodologies This section gives the methodology used for the forecasting of the demand scenarios, calculation of the stocking obligations, the initial estimation of facilities construction and operating costs and explanation of the forward pricing scenario for crude oil and petroleum products. 3.1. Methodology for Energy Demand Forecasting Models prepared by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were used to predict demand. The models MAED (Model for Analysis of Energy Demand) and MESSAGE (Model for Energy Supply Strategy Alternatives and their General Environmental Impact) are particularly suitable for regional and scenario analysis.
The MAED model is used to project useful/final energy demand. Useful demand is an input to MESSAGE model. Energy systems are modelled and optimised using MESSAGE model. Figure 1 shows the main interaction in the planning process and shows the use of the MAED and MESSAGE models.
Figure 1 Planning Process Interaction
Social and Economic Perspective Development drivers (economy, population,…)
Assesment of Assesment of energy needs Technology natural resources MAED model choices
Exogenous Analysis of energy supply options Regional assumptions MESSAGE model exchange
Environmental Financial and other burdens and mitigation resource requirements
Sustainable energy strategy Investment schedule, energy supply prices, fuel consumption, emissions,…
The methodology of the MAED model was originally developed by. B. Chateau and B. Lapillonne of the Institute Economique et Juridique de l′Energie (IEJE) of the University of Grenoble, France, and was presented as
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 5 26 April 2011
the MEDEE model. The IAEA adopted a simplified version of this model (MEDEE 2) and incorporated important modifications to make it more suitable for application in the developing countries, and it was named as the MAED model.
The MAED model evaluates future energy demand based on medium to long term scenarios of socio economic, technological and demographic developments. The model relates systematically the specific energy demand for producing various goods and services identified in the model to the corresponding social, economic and technological factors that affect this demand.
Energy demand is disaggregated into a large number of end use categories; each one corresponding to a given service or to the production of a certain product. The nature and level of the demand for goods and services are a function of several determining factors including
• population growth • number of inhabitants per dwelling • number of electrical appliances used in households • peoples’ mobility and preferences for transportation modes • national priorities for the development of certain industries or economic sectors • the evolution of the efficiency of certain types of equipment • market penetration of new technologies or energy forms
The expected future trends for these determining factors, which constitute scenarios, are exogenously 1 introduced.
An understanding of these determining factors permits the evaluation of the various categories of energy demand for each economic sector to be considered. The total energy demand for each end use category is aggregated into four main energy consumer sectors
• industry (including agriculture, construction, mining and manufacturing) • transportation • commercial • residential
1 In an economic model, an exogenous change is one that comes from outside the model and is unexplained by the model. For example, in the simple supply and demand model, a change in consumer tastes or preferences is unexplained by the model and also leads to endogenous changes in demand that lead to changes in the equilibrium price. Put another way, an exogenous change involves an alteration of a variable that is autonomous, i.e., unaffected by the workings of the model.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 6 26 April 2011
The model provides a systematic accounting framework for evaluating the effect on energy demand during a change in economics or in the standard of living of the population.
The starting point for using the MAED model is construction of base year energy consumption patterns within the model. This requires compiling and reconciling necessary data from different sources, obtaining and calculating various input parameters and adjusting them to establish a base year energy balance. This helps to calibrate the model to the country’s specific situation.
The next step is developing future scenarios, specific to a country’s situation and objectives. The scenarios can be sub divided into two sub scenarios:
• The socio economic system describing the fundamental characteristics of the social and economic evolution of the country • The other related to the technological factors affecting the calculation of energy demand, for example, the efficiency and market penetration potential of each alternative energy form.
The key to plausible and useful scenarios is internal consistency of assumptions, especially for social, economic and technological evolution. A good understanding of the dynamic interplay among various driving forces or determining factors is necessary. The model output, i.e. future energy demand, is just a reflection of these scenario assumptions. The evaluation of output and the modification of initial assumptions is the basic process by which reasonable results are derived.
The model focuses exclusively on energy demand, and even more specifically on demand for specified energy services. When various energy forms, i.e. electricity, fossil fuels, etc., are competing for a given end use category of energy demand, this demand is calculated first in terms of useful energy and then converted into final energy, taking into account market penetration and the efficiency of each alternative energy source, both specified as scenario parameters. Non substitutable energy uses, such as motor fuels for cars, electricity for specific uses (electrolysis, lighting etc.), are calculated directly in terms of final energy.
Demand for fossil fuels is therefore not broken down in terms of coal, gas or oil, because this energy supply mix largely depends on the technological possibilities of supply and relative prices of these fuels, aspects that are outside the scope of the MAED analysis. The substitution of fossil fuels by alternative energy forms (i.e., solar, district heat, etc.) is nevertheless estimated due to the importance of the structural changes in energy demand that these energy forms may introduce in the future. Since these substitutions
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 7 26 April 2011
will be essentially determined by policy decisions, they are to be taken into account at the stage of formulating and writing the development scenarios.
Figure 2 MAED Model Main Inputs and Outputs
3.2. Stock Holding Obligation Calculation Methodology The stock holding requirement is determined for each country according to the Emergency Oil Stock Obligation Directive 2009/119/EC. This requires that Member States shall ensure that the total oil stocks maintained at all times within the Community for their benefit correspond, at the very least, to 90 days of average daily net imports or 61 days of average daily inland consumption, whichever of the two quantities is greater.
The average daily net imports is calculated on the basis of the crude oil equivalent of imports which is obtained by calculating the sum of the net imports of crude oil, NGL, refinery feedstocks and adding this to the net imports of all other petroleum products, excluding naphtha, adjusted to take account of stock changes and multiplied by a factor of 1.065. From the sum of the net imports of crude oil, NGL, refinery feedstocks a deduction is made of 4% to account for naphtha yield.
Inland consumption is the sum of the aggregate observed gross inland deliveries of the following products:
• motor gasoline • aviation gasoline • gasoline type jet fuel (naphtha type jet fuel or JP4) • kerosene type jet fuel • other kerosene • gas/diesel oil (distillate fuel oil) • fuel oil (high sulphur content and low sulphur content)
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 8 26 April 2011
The crude oil equivalent of inland consumption is calculated by multiplying the sum of the aggregate observed gross inland deliveries by a factor of 1.2.
The emergency stocks must take the form of at least the greater of 30 days of products within saleable categories and there is assumed to be a requirement to allow for 10% of the stocks to be unavailable due to technical problems such as remaining in tank bottoms and being unavailable for drawdown.
Modelling of emergency stocks obligation in countries with refineries assumed maximal amount of crude oil was because the building of storage capacities for crude oil and storing of crude oil is cheapest than those of petroleum products, as well as the price of crude oil itself. On the other hand, countries with no domestic refinery were assumed to hold the entire obligation in petroleum products. Amounts of petroleum products held were estimated on basis of the inland consumption of main products (motor gasoline, kerosene and jet fuel, gas/diesel oil, residual fuel oil). One must bear in mind that each country has to set up its own structure of emergency stocks and that the structure of stocks presented in the study is by no means binding for Beneficiaries.
In estimating the required storage, the largest calculated required volume of storage for each individual petroleum product and crude oil in the modelled period is taken and rounded up to give the required volume of storage. This approach is then taken forward to calculate capital investments in compulsory oil storage capacities. It is important to note that these calculated volumes and capital expenditures do not include the possible utilisation of existing storage capacities unless the Consultant assessed that some volume of storages need modernisation. In other words, the calculation assumes that storage for all the required stocks must be built in addition to existing storage capacities.
Biofuels
Directive 2009/119/EC recognises that biofuels are becoming increasingly required in the energy mix of the EU and subsequently the Energy Community and other legislation and targets (e.g. the 20 20 20 Scheme) require increased use of biofuels within a 10 year time frame.
Under Directive 2009/119/EC, when calculating the stock holding obligations, biofuels shall be taken into account when blended and consumed with transport fuels. When accounting for the actual stockholding, biofuels should only be counted as part of the physical stockholding where they are blended to the appropriate specification or there is the intention and capability to blend them to required specification.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 9 26 April 2011
3.3. Data Reporting Requirements Directive 2009/119/EC sets out the requirements for data collection which are required to calculate the stock holding obligation as set out in Section 3.2 (which is covered by EC Regulation 1099/2008) and also requirements for reporting actual stock levels. The data reports from the facilities and companies holding the stocks should be collated by one central body. This should be done by an appropriate government department or by a Central Stock Holding Entity where one has been created. The reporting requirements are summarised here:
• Specific Stocks (Those held by a Central Stockholding Entity) and consisting of certain fuel types) must be catalogued in terms of volume and location • A statistical summary of Specific Stocks must be submitted to the Commission monthly giving, location, volumes and days of supply equivalent of the Specific Stocks based on the last day of the previous calendar month • A statistical summary of Commercial Stocks must also be submitted to the Commission monthly • Commercial statistical summaries must be aggregated to protect commercial confidentiality • An annual register of stocks must be kept and continuously updated
It is important to note that the reporting of inventories must happened promptly and reports must be processed and submitted to the commission within the following calendar month to which they relate. The Commission will collate and store all submitted data and make available digitally as appropriate. 3.4. Data Collection and Processing In order to comply with Directive 2009/119/EC, each Beneficiary will have to collate and process large amounts of data from many different sources. The processing has definitive time scales which mean it must be efficiently conducted and not place too greater burden on the companies or the body which is responsible for the data collection and processing.
In order the do this, EU Member States have implemented electronic reporting systems to collate the data and produce reports the required reports both to go to the European Commission and also for emergency planning purposes. The collated data can then be fed into models to determine the obligation for holding emergency stocks. The data are input electronically by companies. This is advantageous as the data are only typed out once, and are already in a standardised format and easy to use.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 10 26 April 2011
The United Kingdom operates two systems which are used in the collection of data for calculation stockholding obligations:
• The Petroleum Production Reporting System (PPRS). PPRS is an administrative data collection system that requires licensees operating on the UK Continental Shelf to submit monthly details of their hydrocarbon (both oil and gas) production to the Department. PPRS is used to report flows, stocks and of crude oils and Natural Gas Liquids from field level through to final disposal. It is a condition of operation on the UKCS that companies submit monthly returns to government.
• Downstream oil information, including information on the transformation of crude oil into petroleum products at refineries, imports and exports of petroleum products, and the delivery of these products into consumption by various users, is collected through the Downstream Oil Reporting System (DORS). DORS was developed in cooperation with industry.
In order to comply with DORS, refiners and importers have to submit completed forms to the Department of Energy and Climate change on a monthly basis. Examples of the forms can be seen in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 11 26 April 2011
Figure 3 Refiners Data Collection Sheet
Source: UK Emergency Oil Stocks A guide to the measures the UK adopts to meet its international obligations to maintain emergency oil stocks
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 12 26 April 2011
Figure 4 Importers Data Collection Form
Source: UK Emergency Oil Stocks A guide to the measures the UK adopts to meet its international obligations to maintain emergency oil stocks
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 13 26 April 2011
3.5. Facilities Capital and Operating Cost Estimation Capital construction costs for the required investment in storage capacity are estimated on the basis of the results of the Consultants survey and experience of terminal and tankage construction projects implemented in Europe in the recent past.
Average costs of these projects amounted to 240 €/m3 for petroleum products and 200 €/m 3 for crude oil. They include all the costs such as land acquisition, construction work, state fees, the necessary infrastructure, ground works and labour costs. Of course, there is potential for variation of these costs for the different countries which will for some countries have an effect on the total net investment required. It is the Consultants aim to give an outline of the approximate scale of the likely costs and definitive engineering studies for each country should be undertaken. The Consultant does however note that there is potential for significant deviation from the average price of construction for the jet fuel tanks because of the small volume required. However, given that their share in total storage capacity is relatively small, there should be relatively little impact on the total estimated investment requirements.
Table 2 Assumed Tankage Construction Costs Commodity Cost ( € / m3) Crude Oil 200 Petroleum Products 240 Source: PDC & EIHP Analysis
The Consultant has also taken an average of normal operating costs in Europe as an approximation of operating costs for emergency oil stocks storage. Operating costs used in this study present the average operating costs attained at the existing terminals for crude oil and petroleum products. They include terminal maintenance costs, labour costs, energy costs, fees and maintenance of stocks and a break down of the costs used is given in Table 3.
Table 3 Storage Operating Cost Estimates Input Cost ( € / m3) Maintenance 3.0 Salaries 4.0 Energy 0.4 Fees 3.8 Stocks maintenance (e.g. Cycling) 4.0 Total 15.2 Source: PDC & EIHP Analysis
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 14 26 April 2011
Each country has to carry out its own detailed analysis of storage capacities as well as economic and financial analyses of existing or future stockholding system. The Beneficiaries has to be aware that there are a number of ways to achieve the obligation of stockholding. There are two basic models of stockholding system. One of them is an agency or a similar independent body that would take care of all aspects of emergency stockholding and another one is industry holding emergency stocks. There are also a number of variations in between that may be short term in a transitional period or long term. Organisational and financial aspects of stockholding presented in the study are only one of the many ways of achieving the obligatory targets and it should be used as a general guideline for countries in their effort of implementing the Directive 2009/119/EC. The competent institutions could also choose to store part of the obligation in products/crude oil another country through a bilateral agreement or to hold part of the obligation in form of tickets. In summary, there are several possibilities to achieve 90/61 days of stocks:
• to build new storage for emergency oil stocks • to store large quantity of stocks in form of crude oil in the refineries or coastal terminals • to lease existing storage capacities from the private companies • to delegate part of the stocks to operators • to delegate part of the stocks to Central Stockholding Entities in another country/countries (bilateral agreement) • to include tickets • different combination of above possibilities
Each country should assess the best way of holding the emergency stocks whether it is the cheapest, the quickest or safest way for it. The most suitable way of stockholding depends on a numerous factors such as financing possibilities, current situation of infrastructure, number of traders, presence of domestic refinery, time targets, future projects in oil sector, etc. The manner of holding stocks is also able to be changed when conditions change. 3.6. Forward Crude Oil & Product Pricing In order to provide a cost basis for the acquisition of petroleum products to meet the stock holding requirement in each country, it is important to have a reasonable view on what future prices may be. It is impossible to know with any certainty what prices will be several years in to the future. However, a common approach to this problem is to plan based on assumptions that future product prices will be linked to each other and to the price of crude oil in a way that reflects historical trends.
Analysis of historical prices shows that product to crude oil and product to product ratios and differentials (sometimes referred to as crack spreads) tend
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 15 26 April 2011
to follow fairly consistent patterns and trends. These pricing relationships tend to be reasonably consistent over a wide range of absolute crude oil prices. This feature is particularly useful as crude oil price has proved to be particularly volatile, with a range in recent years from about US$10/bbl to over US$150/bbl.
The difficultly in predicting oil price beyond a relatively short period into the future has proved problematic to all oil industry players. This has given rise to the approach of developing oil price scenarios which side step this problem. This is the approach adopted for the analysis in this study.
It is important to note that there is no one correct view of where oil prices may be in the future. For this study, an oil price scenario has been developed based on US$80/bbl Brent (fob, ARA).
Market prices quotations are provided by several organisations and published in various journals. These allow historical analysis of pricing relationships. This applies to different grades of crude oil in different locations as well as to petroleum products.
Based on such historical crude oil price relationships, a forecast for Urals crude oil, delivered into the Mediterranean region, has been made that is appropriate to US$80/bbl Brent (fob, ARA). This is approximately US$78/bbl Urals, cif Mediterranean. This is deemed most appropriate for the countries covered in this study as many are close to the Mediterranean and may well process Urals crude oil in their refineries (where they have them).
Historical price analysis enables the typical range of pricing ratios and differentials to be established. The chart below demonstrates that product price ratios to crude oil are maintained in a fairly narrow band over time and a wide range of absolute oil price. This pricing analysis is based on cif Med cargo prices.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 16 26 April 2011
Figure 5 Product/Crude Price Ratios
1.80 100 1.60 90
1.40 80
70 1.20 60 1.00 50 0.80 40 0.60 30
Urals, CIF Med ($/bbl) 0.40 20 price ratios Product:crude 0.20 10 0.00 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
LPG Naphtha Jet UL95 EN590 Gasoil 1% FO 3.5%FO Urals CIF Med $/bbl
Pricing ratios and differentials can evolve over time as a function of market, regulatory and product quality changes. However, these factors have all varied over the last 15 years and still the range of price ratios has remained fairly constant. As a consequence, the forecast used here does not deviate significantly from the recent past.
The actual pricing levels for products in each country will differ from the cif Med cargo prices, depending on the specific supply and demand position of each country. Deficit countries will tend to pay slightly more, due to the cost of importing from the Mediterranean, while surplus countries would achieve a price in country which is typically less that the cif Med cargo price due to the need to export marginal production.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 17 26 April 2011
Table 4 Assumed Product Prices Product Price / Tonne Gasoline US$ 750 Diesel US$ 710 Jet fuel US$ 740 Gas oil US$ 710 Fuel oil US$ 450 Product Basket € 477 Crude Oil € 430 Source: PDC Analysis of publicly available data 2
2 A note on data sources: all data presented in tables within this report has come from the Beneficiaries responses to Consultant’s Questionnaires and the Consultant’s analysis of that data.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 18 26 April 2011
3.7. Obligation Calculation Model Construction This section aims to provide a guide to the construction of a spread sheet model for determining the required obligation under Directive 2009/119/EC. The key functions of such a model are outlined here:
• Gather for each country the following annual data from statistic agencies and from models for future dates: o Domestic crude oil production o Crude oil import o Crude export o Domestic refinery product output o Imports of petroleum products o Exports of petroleum products o Domestic consumption of petroleum products
• Tabulate the above data and calculate net import/export balance and stock changes. This will create an energy balance for the country in terms of oil and petroleum products
• The energy balances for the relevant years are then converted to tonnes of oil equivalent (toe). Then both methods of determining the stock holding obligation (i.e. based on imports and domestic consumption) are applied for each year as set out in Section 3.2
• The results for both the import and domestic consumption obligation are then compared. The obligation which is the greater amount in toe terms is the obligation which must be met
• The obligation is then converted from toe back into tonnes.
• The obligation in tonnes is then converted into a volume in cubic meters using the relevant products density
• This volume is then rounded up to allow for tank size construction.
• The capital cost of the tankage is then determined by multiplying the volume of required tankage by the estimated cost per cubic meter
• The cost of the physical stocks is then determined by multiplying the obligation in tonnes for each product by the relevant price.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 19 26 April 2011
4. The Role of the Central Stockholding Agency EU Member States have taken different approaches to managing strategic stocks with some setting up Central Stockholding Agencies (CSE), others obligating operating companies (referred to as “economic operators” in Directive 2009/119/EC) to hold oil stocks and some having the country’s stock holding obligation split between operating companies and a CSE. All three approaches can satisfy the requirements set out in Directive 2009/119/EC.
However a CSE is structured, whether as a government department or as a corporate entity, CSE’s should satisfy the following criteria:
• Be a non profit entity • Formed within the Member State or other Member State • Have the specific purpose of managing the Member State’s emergency and specific oil stocks
Where stocks are held by companies as well as a CSE, it is usual for the CSE to also be responsible for monitoring & reporting of oil stocks. It should be noted that whilst the CSE may audit the holdings of economic operators, Directive 2009/119/EC also requires that third parties appointed by the commission may audit oil stocks held by both the CSE and the company. Where the country has elected not to form a CSE and obligates companies to hold emergency stocks, there should be one sole body for collating and reporting stockholding levels. 4.1. CSE Formation and Constitution Where a country has elected to form a CSE, there is considerable flexibility in how the CSE can be formed and how it can operate. Two contrasting examples from countries that have recently joined the EU are given below in Sections 4.1.1 (Hungary) and 0 (Czech Republic). In Hungary, the CSE is an independent company owned by oil and petroleum companies which is constituted to be non profit making and holds the oil stocks obligations at least cost to the member companies. In the Czech Republic the central government controls and funds emergency oil stocks.
4.1.1. Hungary Hungary is one of the first of the former Eastern Bloc countries to join the European Union and was required to update its emergency oil stock holding policies. In 1991, with the liberalisation of crude oil and petroleum products trading, there was no longer a state controlled apparatus for ensuring adequate emergency oil stocks. In order to guarantee the provision of these significant stocks, the Hungarian Petroleum Association was formed to include the state oil company MOL and also the Hungarian affiliates of the international oil companies operating in Hungary at that time.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 20 26 April 2011
In 1993, the Hungarian Parliament adopted Act IL/1993 which laid out the requirements for stock piling of oil products. In order to stockpile effectively, the 14 oil companies established the Association of Crude Oil and Oil Products Stockpiling (KKKSz). Now known as HUSA, it is an independent organisation but its actions are controlled as laid down in the Act of 1993 and so acts to ensure Hungary’s compliance with storage requirements whilst allowing industry efficiently to stockpile the required quantities.
HUSA has the following tasks:
• Create strategic stocks equal to 90 days of net imports • Ensure technical conditions for safe storage • Ensure lowest cost operation of the stock piling system • Ensure equal burden on all market players
HUSA has the following obligations in terms of what form the emergency oil stocks can take:
• Crude oil • Motor Gasoline • Diesel Fuel • Maximum 10% of stocks can be heavy fuel oil • 90% of stocks must be crude oil and Motor Gasoline / Diesel
In the 1993 Act, it was realised that to build stocks and storage capacity equivalent to 90 days’ net import levels would be impractical in a short time frame. Hence a schedule of stock building was required such that 20 days’ of net import levels was required by 31 December 1993, adding 10 days by the end of each subsequent year so that by 31 December 1998 there would be the equivalent of 90 day net import levels as emergency oil stocks,.
The emergency stocks were created in two ways:
Petroleum Products:
• Purchase through bidding • Toll processing in domestic refinery
Crude:
• Purchase through bidding
The storage of stocks by HUSA is carried out by contracting partners which can be divided into 3 categories:
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 21 26 April 2011
• Independent market players • 100% HUSA owned storage companies • Partially HUSA owned storage companies
All facilities that hold strategic stocks must have minimum loading and unloading capacities to allow sufficient flexibility for storage:
• Unloading Rail: minimum 2000 m 3/day • Loading Rail: minimum 2000 m 3/day Road: 1000 m 3/day
The financing of the stocks was initially done through a series of tendered, rolling one year loan facilities. Up until 2001, these loans were guaranteed by the government but from then the stocks acted as security for financing needs.
Table 5 HUSA Cash Flows Expenses Storage and Cycling costs 70% Financing costs 25% Operational costs 5%
Income Members contribution 100% Dividends from KKKSz companies Potential Source: IEA/China Seminar on Oil Stocks and Emergency Response, Beijing 9 10 December, 2002 Session 4 – IEA Experiences in Building Oil Stockholding Facilities Stockpiling Practice in Hungary
4.1.2. Czech Republic In the Czech Republic the holding of emergency oil stocks is carried out by the central government. The break up of Czechoslovakia in 1993 meant that Czech and Slovak reserves were not located where they best served the needs of the two now separate countries. In terms of energy policy and particularly oil stocks, the Czech Republic had two goals: joining the IEA which occurred in February 2001 and achieving EU membership.
The emergency oil stocks are owned by the government and financed from the central government budget. To manage and hold these stocks, the Administration of State Material Reserves (ASMR) was created. ASMR has
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 22 26 April 2011
the responsibility of monitoring and reporting the condition of emergency oil stocks.
There are three main pieces of Czech legislation pertaining to oil stocks:
• Act 97/1993 on the ASMR • Act 189/1999 oil stocks and procedures • Decree 194/2000 Further detail on oil stocks
Act 189/1999 sets out what constitutes a supply interruption which would trigger release of emergency oil stocks by the ASMR and actions and powers which the ASMR may deploy in a supply interruption.
These measures can be summarised as:
• Motoring speed and vehicle restrictions • Aviation restrictions • Retailing restrictions • Rationing • Temporary loans of stocks to relieve localised problems
The ASMR also has powers for enforcement in times of supply disruption. ASMR reports to the National Emergency Strategy Organisation (NESO) and agrees basic documentation, approval of procedures and relevant training.
The Czech emergency oil stocks are required to be a maximum of 60% crude oil and the rest in products that conform to EU categories. A maximum of 17% may be held abroad under a ticketing arrangement but this requires government approval.
4.2. CSE Operation CSE’s can operate in a variety of ways in terms of ownership, operation and maintenance of emergency stocks and storage tankage. Under Directive 2009/119/EC, tankage maybe:
• Owned outright by the CSE • Owned in part by the CSE (for example joint facilities with companies to reduce costs by increasing scale) • Leased from commercial providers • Owned by CSE’s or companies in other countries • Operated by the CSE or third party contractors
Emergency stocks maybe: • Owned outright by the CSE
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 23 26 April 2011
• Held by delegate companies (both within country and in other Member States) • Held via ticketing arrangements with the option to buy emergency oil stocks when required (often held with international oil companies).
4.3. CSE Financing CSEs have a requirement for both initial capital expenditure for the purchasing of stocks and construction of facilities, and ongoing operation expenditure. Options for the Beneficiaries are discussed within each country section of this report but a brief overview of the possible options are provided here with some key points about the two approaches:
Central Government Funding: • Easy to administer • Usually low capital costs • Consumers do not contribute proportionally to their consumption • Often shields vulnerable consumers such as the energy poor from additional costs
Consumer levy on fuel by unit • Harder to administer • Can have higher capital costs such unless there are government guarantees • Proportional contribution by consumers based on consumption • Public are aware of the cost of emergency oil stocks
In terms of financing the initial cost of the storage, the host government often provides a soft loan or loan guarantee for the capital costs in order to establish the emergency stocks and then further financing is secured against the emergency stocks and the facilities (Germany and Hungary are two EU examples of this approach).
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 24 26 April 2011
5. Albania Albania’s geological oil reserves are mostly non conventional (e.g. heavy, asphalt resinous and high sulphur) and are estimated at 450 million bbl. Crude oil is produced from seven oil fields in southern Albania. Crude oil production in the last few years amounted to almost twice domestic crude needs. Bankers Petroleum Albania Ltd is currently redeveloping the Patos Marinza oil field through individual well leases from Albpetrol. The company plans phased take over of Albpetrol areas to allow for an area clean up and establish full consolidation of existing operations areas under Bankers’ management. Shut down of Albpetrol’s facilities and flow lines was scheduled for end of 2010, and complete field take over and clean up by 2013.
There are two refineries in operation in Albania both belonging to the company ARMO (Albanian Refining and Marketing of Oil), a former state owned company which was privatised in 2008 with the shareholders being Amra Oil Sha and a consortium of Refinery Associates of Texas, Anika Enterprises & Mercuria Energy Group that holds 85% of the shares. The remaining 15% of shares are owned by the Albanian Government, represented by the Ministry of Economy Trade and Energy. Oil products from the refineries supply about one third of the domestic market. Recent increases in demand for light products cannot be met by the domestic refineries. Imported motor fuels are cheaper and of better quality than those produced in the domestic refineries and hence most of the petroleum products are imported from Greece and Italy.
Significant foreign investment is being made as the potential for increased recovery in existing oil fields is being realised. This indicates a potential for additional output which should benefit the oil refineries where further investments are also planned. 5.1. Crude Oil and Oil Product Supply and Demand The following figures provide a summary of the current and forecast position in Albania based on the methodology outlined in Section 3.1.
Emergency Oil Stocks in the Energy Community Level 25 26 April 2011
Figure 6 Crude Oil Production, Albania, 2007-2020
2.500
2.000
1.500
x 1 0001x t 1.000
500
0 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2015. 2020.
Figure 7 Crude Oil Import and Export, Albania, 2007-2020
200
0 2007. 2008. 2009. 2010. 2015. 2020. 200