Mogadishu] Mudug 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cholera Factsheet Somalia
Cholera Factsheet for Action - ZAMBIA CHOLERA FACTSHEET SOMALIA Figure 1. Annual number of suspected cholera cases and case fatality CHOLERA OVERVIEW rate in Somalia, 1990 – 20171 Seventh pandemic cholera was first reported in Somalia in 1970. Since 1990, the largest outbreaks were reported in 1994- 1996, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011-2012 and 2016-2017. Large- scale epidemics have increased over the past two decades (Fig. 1).1 During 2012 and 2016-2018, epidemiological surveillance reported 112,736 suspected cholera cases. South-Central Somalia accounted for 77% of all reported cholera cases (Table I). In South-Central, the regions of Banadir and Bay, were most affected with a combined 32.3% of all suspected cases during the near four-year period (Fig. 2, Table II).2 The country has been affected by recent cross-border cholera outbreaks involving Ethiopia, Kenya and likely Yemen.3 CHOLERA DISTRIBUTION Figure 2. Cumulative cholera incidence by region in Somalia, 2012, In South-Central Somalia, Banadir Region (coterminous with 2 the city of Mogadishu) reported cholera outbreaks every year of 2016-2018 the study period and accounted for the highest percentage of cholera cases among all regions (17.6%). Bay Region reported 14.7% of all suspected cases, of which 90.2% were reported during the recent outbreak in 2017 (Fig. 4, Table II).2 Lower Juba Region, which borders Garissa County and Wajir County in Kenya, reported 9.2% of all suspected cases. Lower Juba consistently reported cholera outbreaks all four years. Lower Shabelle Region, which borders Banadir Region, reported 7.1% of all suspected cases. -
MAX Security Report [email protected] +44 203 540 0434
MAX Security Report [email protected] +44 203 540 0434 Politics Somalia SITUATION UPDATE: Lower House of 14 Parliament passes resolution extending APR President Farmajo’s mandate for two years on 12:03 UTC April 12 Executive Summary: On April 12, the Lower House of Parliament, allied to President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmajo, voted to extend the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) mandate following months of failed dialogue with Federal Member States (FMS) and opposition leaders in an effort to resolve protracted electoral disputes. Apart from the complete breakdown of FGS-FMS dialogue, that the Lower House extended Farmajo’s term without consensus from all electoral stakeholders and the resolution of protracted electoral disputes, which leaves Somalia increasingly vulnerable to political and security threats. Despite overwhelming international condemnation of the FGS’s action, given that Farmajo has demonstrated resolve to hold on to power despite the immense risks to Somalia’s stability, the political and security situation in Somalia is poised to remain highly volatile over the coming days. Please be advised: On April 12, the Lower House of Parliament voted to extend the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) and President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmajo’s mandate by an additional two years, with 149 out of 275 deputies voting in favor of the resolution. In a statement, President Farmajo praised the resolution and claimed that the term extension page 1 / 3 will provide the FGS time to implement a universal suffrage electoral model facilitating the participation of all Somali citizens in the next elections. The Upper House of Parliament released a separate communique claiming that the mandate extension is unconstitutional on the grounds that President Farmajo’s term ended on February 8. -
Country Profile – Somalia
Country profile – Somalia Version 2014 Recommended citation: FAO. 2014. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Somalia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]. -
Cash and Markets Quarterly Dashboard - Somalia October - December 2018 Produced on 30Th January 2019
Cash and Markets Quarterly Dashboard - Somalia October - December 2018 Produced on 30th January 2019 Introduction Recommended transfer values Table 1: Recommended transfer values (USD) Map 1: Percentage change in price of main cereal from October to December 2018 Cash-based interventions have been used by The CWG uses FSNAU's CMEB values as the basis Region Multi-purpose Food transfer humanitarian organisations in Somalia since 20031. for determining transfer value recommendations. transfer value value However significant variations have been noted in As per the decision of the CWG, food transfer value Awdal 85 (75) 80 (70) transfer values, sometimes in the same place by recommendations should correspond to 100% of the different organisations, with varying justifications. It is in cost of the food MEB, while multi-purpose transfer value Bakool 70 60 light of this that the Somalia Cash Working Group (CWG) recommendations should correspond to 80% of the Banaadir 65 50 started convening in February 2017, against a backdrop cost of the full MEB, both rounded to the nearest 5. In Bari 85 80 of an increase in number of agencies using cash-based addition, transfer value recommendations should remain Bay 50 30 interventions to respond to the 2016-2017 drought, fixed for three months at a time, and only be subject to with an aim to streamline the design, development change if the CMEB changes by more than 10% (see Galgaduud 100 90 and implementation of cash based interventions in the Tables 2 and 3 for details on the CMEB). Gedo 70 60 country. Within this, the CWG provides transfer value In consideration of this, in regions where a more than Hiraan 60 45 recommendations on a quarterly basis - based on the 10% change in the CMEB was recorded between October cost of the minimum expenditure basket (CMEB) - to Lower Juba 95 75 and December 2018, an updated recommendation is humanitarian organisations implementing cash-based Lower Shabelle 45 30 provided and the previous one is shown in brackets. -
UNHCR As of 31 July 2019
SOMALIA SITUATION Population of concern to UNHCR as of 31 July 2019 MILLION MILLION 811,275 2.65 35,040 3.58 SOMALI REFUGEES AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED IN SOMALIA REFUGEES AND ASYLUM-SEEKERS PERSONS OF CONCERN ASYLUM-SEEKERS Banadir 19% hosted in Somalia SOMALIA SITUATION Bay 10% hosted in neighbouring countries Ethiopia 21,295 Sool 9% Kenya 257,079 Gedo 8% Yemen Internally displaced Somalis * 13,153 Internally displaced Somalis 2.65M Ethiopia 257,283 Bari 7% Yemen 250,653 Lower Juba 6% Other countries 592 SomalSi roemfuagleie rse afundg eaessy launmd- 811,275 Mudug 6% saeeskyelursm-seekers Uganda 32,535 Galgaduud 5% Somali returnees Djibouti 13,125 Refugee returnees 90,024 Lower Shabelle 5% Eritrea 600 * Togdheer 5% Refugees and asylum-seekers 90,225 Refugees and asylum-seekers * Ethiopia as of 31 Aug 2018; Eritrea as of 30 June 2019 Woqooyi Galbeed 4% in Somalia 35,040 Other regions 15% SOMALI REFUGEE RETURNEES AGE AND GENDER COMPOSITION [2014 - 2019] As of July 2019, Somalia was host to 35,040 registered of refugees and asylum-seekers Estimated IDP statistics, Somalia Information Management Working Group, June 2018 39,990 refugees and asylum seekers, mainly from Ethiopia and Yemen. 58% 81% 36,747 Z CHILDREN ^Z WOMEN & REASONS FOR DISPLACEMENT Over 90,000 Somali refugees have voluntarily returned to below 18 yrs CHILDREN Drought related 54% Somalia since December 2014 with UNHCR assistance from Conflict/Insecurity 30% different countries of asylum including Kenya, Yemen, Djibouti, 39% 3% 10,753 Libya, Tunisia and Eritrea. In addition, some 42,000 Somalis \^ ADULTS ` ELDERLY Flood 12% 2,735 18-59 yrs above 60 yrs were monitored as arriving from Yemen since March 2015. -
Country of Origin Information Report Somalia July 2008
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT SOMALIA 30 JULY 2008 UK BORDER AGENCY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE 30 JULY 2008 SOMALIA Contents Preface LATEST NEWS EVENTS IN SOMALIA, FROM 4 JULY 2008 TO 30 JULY 2008 REPORTS ON SOMALIA PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED SINCE 4 JULY 2008 Paragraphs Background Information GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................. 1.01 Maps .............................................................................................. 1.04 ECONOMY ................................................................................................. 2.01 Currency change, 2008 ................................................................ 2.06 Drought and famine, 2008 ........................................................... 2.10 Telecommunications.................................................................... 2.14 HISTORY ................................................................................................... 3.01 Collapse of central government and civil war ........................... 3.01 Peace initiatives 2000-2006 ......................................................... 3.14 ‘South West State of Somalia’ (Bay and Bakool) ...................... 3.19 ‘Puntland’ Regional Administration............................................ 3.20 The ‘Republic of Somaliland’ ...................................................... 3.21 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................... 4.01 CONSTITUTION ......................................................................................... -
Gedo Intercluster Initial Investigation – September
INTER -AGENCY DROUGHT ASSESSMENT IN LOWER JUBA REGION OF SOMALIA JANUARY 2017 INTER-AGENCY DROUGHT ASSESSMENT IN LOWER JUBA REGION – JANUARY 2017 Table of contents Executive summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Key findings --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Recommendations --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Acronyms, abbreviations and definitions of Somalia terminologies --------------------------- 6 Acknowledgement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Introduction /context of the inter-agency assessment -------------------------------------------- 8 Methodology ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 Assessment findings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Impact of drought ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Findings by cluster ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Food Security and Livelihoods --------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Education ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 Nutrition -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Water, Sanitation -
Somalia Terror Threat
THECHRISTOPHER TERROR February 12, THREAT FROM THE TERROR THREAT FROM SOMALIA THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF AL SHABAAB CHRISTOPHER HARNISCH APPENDICES AND MAPS BY KATHERINE ZIMMERMAN FEBRUARY 12, 2010 A REPORT BY THE CRITICAL THREATS PROJECT OF THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE THE TERROR THREAT FROM SOMALIA CHRISTOPHER HARNISCH February 12, 2010 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 IMPORTANT GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN SOMALIA 3 NOTABLE INDIVIDUALS 4 INTRODUCTION 8 ORIGINS OF AL SHABAAB 10 GAINING CONTROL, GOVERNING, AND MAINTAINING CONTROL 14 AL SHABAAB’S RELATIONSHIP WITH AL QAEDA, THE GLOBAL JIHAD MOVEMENT, AND ITS GLOBAL IDEOLOGY 19 INTERNATIONAL RECRUITING AND ITS IMPACT 29 AL SHABAAB’S INTERNATIONAL THREATS 33 THREAT ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION 35 APPENDIX A: TIMELINE OF MAJOR SECURITY EVENTS IN SOMALIA 37 APPENDIX B: MAJOR SUICIDE ATTACKS AND ASSASSINATIONS CLAIMED BY OR ATTRIBUTED TO AL SHABAAB 47 NOTES 51 Maps MAP OF THE HORN OF AFRICA AND MIDDLE EAST 5 POLITICAL MAP OF SOMALIA 6 MAP OF ISLAMIST-CONTROLLED AND INFLUENCED AREAS IN SOMALIA 7 www.criticalthreats.org THE TERROR THREAT FROM SOMALIA CHRISTOPHER HARNISCH February 12, 2010 Executive Summary hree hundred people nearly died in the skies of and assassinations. Al Shabaab’s primary objectives at TMichigan on Christmas Day, 2009 when a Niger- the time of the Ethiopian invasion appeared to be ian terrorist attempted to blow up a plane destined geographically limited to Somalia, and perhaps the for Detroit. The terrorist was an operative of an al Horn of Africa. The group’s rhetoric and behavior, Qaeda franchise based in Yemen called al Qaeda in however, have shifted over the past two years reflect- the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). -
DOCC Joint Mission Report: Kismayo, Lower Juba Region, 16-17 July 2017
DOCC Joint Mission Report: Kismayo, Lower Juba Region, 16-17 July 2017 I. Situation Overview Kismayo district which hosts Kismayo town, the state capital of Lower Juba, is a pastoral district divided into 3 livelihood zones; southern inland pastoral, comprised mostly of camels, goats/sheep and cattle rearing, southern rainfed which specializes in maize, cattle and goats rearing and Juba pastoral which specializes in cattle and goat rearing. The areas around Kismayo in Lower Juba mostly fall under the pastoral livelihood zone as well. The drought conditions that persist and the poor Gu rains have not replenished the pastures well enough, however, there is some pasture rejuvenation that came with the coastal rains around Kismayo. Reports indicate that the poor rains inland are seeing an increase in surrounding pastoralists migrating towards the greener pastures of Kismayo. The already depleted pastures will not be able to sustain the increase in livestock till the Deyr rains, putting livestock, the main livelihood of the area at risk. Drought conditions persist due to the poor Gu rains that prevailed in most parts of Lower Juba, impacting negatively on access to food, water and pastures. The poor harvests and deaths of livestock has seen a migration of the rural population from Lower Juba and Middle Juba into Kismayo town in search of better livelihoods. There are also people who fled from surrounding areas, particularly Middle Juba, where humanitarian partners have no access, due to conflict in Al Shabaab controlled areas. To date, there are 63,774 IDPs in Kismayo, an increase of 17,742 (61%) from 46,032 in November 2016. -
Somalia 2019 Crime & Safety Report
Somalia 2019 Crime & Safety Report This is an annual report produced in conjunction with the Regional Security Office at the U.S. Mission to Somalia. The current U.S. Department of State Travel Advisory at the date of this report’s publication assesses Somalia at Level 4, indicating travelers should not travel to the country due to crime, terrorism, and piracy. Overall Crime and Safety Situation The U.S. Mission to Somalia does not assume responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the persons or firms appearing in this report. The American Citizen Services unit (ACS) cannot recommend a particular individual or location, and assumes no responsibility for the quality of service provided. Review OSAC’s Somalia-specific page for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password. The U.S. government recommends U.S. citizens avoid travel to Somalia. Terrorist and criminal elements continue to target foreigners and locals in Somalia. Crime Threats There is serious risk from crime in Mogadishu. Violent crime, including assassinations, murder, kidnapping, and armed robbery, is common throughout Somalia, including in Mogadishu. Other Areas of Concern A strong familiarity with Somalia and/or extensive prior travel to the region does not reduce travel risk. Those considering travel to Somalia, including Somaliland and Puntland, should obtain kidnap and recovery insurance, as well as medical evacuation insurance, prior to travel. Inter- clan, inter-factional, and criminal feuding can flare up with little/no warning. After several years of quiet, pirates attacked several ships in 2017 and 2018. -
Turkish-Somali Relations: Changing State Identity and Foreign Policy
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Inquiry (E-Journal - Faculty of Business and Administration,... TURKISH-SOMALI RELATIONS: CHANGING STATE IDENTITY AND FOREIGN POLICY Dr. Abdurrahim Siradag King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals ABSTRACT This article will examine the driving dynamics behind the increasing rela- tions between Turkey and Somalia. Turkey has been an important actor on the African politics since the AK Party (Justice and Development Party) came to power in 2002. For instance, while Turkey only had 12 embassies across the continent until 2005, it currently has 35. Turkey is today among the countries in the world having one of the most diplomatic missions on the African continent. Turkey’s economic relations with the continent have also changed significantly. Whereas Turkey’s total trade with Africa was 2 billion dollars in 2005, it is presently about 22 billion dollars. Importantly, Turkey is aiming to increase her total trade with Africa up to 50 billion dol- lars until 2020. Furthermore, Turkish NGOs are actively involved in many humanitarian projects in the different African countries. Turkey has partic- ularly paid a great deal of attention to increasing political, economic and social relations with Somalia during the AK Party government. This article argues that the AK Party has been establishing a new foreign policy identity and transforming the parameters of the traditional Turkish foreign policy through the social interactions with Somalia. Keywords: -
From the Bottom
Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit From the bottom up: Southern Regions - Perspectives through conflict analysis and key political actors’ mapping of Gedo, Middle Juba, Lower Juba, and Lower Shabelle - SEPTEMBER 2013 With support from Conflict Dynamics International Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit From the bottom up: Southern Regions - Perspectives through conflict analysis and key political actors’ mapping of Gedo, Middle Juba, Lower Juba, and Lower Shabelle Version 2 Re-Released Deceber 2013 with research finished June 2013 With support from Conflict Dynamics International Support to the project was made possible through generous contributions from the Government of Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Government of Switzerland Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the official position of Conflict Dynamics International or of the Governments of Norway or Switzerland. CONTENTS Abbreviations 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 8 Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit (CEWERU) 8 Objectives 8 Conflict Dynamics International (CDI) 8 From the Country Coordinator 9 I. OVERVIEW 10 Social Conflict 10 Cultural Conflict 10 Political Conflict 10 II. INTRODUCTION 11 Key Findings 11 Opportunities 12 III. GEDO 14 Conflict Map: Gedo 14 Clan Chart: Gedo 15 Introduction: Gedo 16 Key Findings: Gedo 16 History of Conflict: Gedo 16 Cross-Border Clan Conflicts 18 Key Political Actors: Gedo 19 Political Actor Mapping: Gedo 20 Clan Analysis: Gedo 21 Capacity of Current Government Administration: Gedo 21 Conflict Mapping and Analysis: Gedo 23 Conflict Profile: Gedo 23 Conflict Timeline: Gedo 25 Peace Initiative: Gedo 26 IV. MIDDLE JUBA 27 Conflict Map: Middle Juba 27 Clan Chart: Middle Juba 28 Introduction: Middle Juba 29 Key Findings: Middle Juba 29 History of Conflict : Middle Juba 29 Key Political Actors: Middle Juba 29 Political Actor Mapping: Middle Juba 30 Capacity of Current Government Administration: Middle Juba 31 Conflict Mapping and Analysis: Middle Juba 31 Conflict Profile: Middle Juba 31 V.