Master's Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Master's Thesis UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA FACULTY OF PHARMACY DAMIJANA GREGORIČ MASTER’S THESIS UNIFORM MASTER’S STUDY OF PHARMACY Ljubljana, 2016 UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA FACULTY OF PHARMACY DAMIJANA GREGORIČ ALERGIJSKI KONTAKTNI DERMATITIS TER DRUGE KOŽNE REAKCIJE, POVZROČENE OB STIKU Z RASTLINAMI Allergic contact dermatitis and other skin reactions caused by plants UNIFORM MASTER’S STUDY OF PHARMACY Ljubljana, 2016 My master thesis was written during my Erasmus exchange from March 2015 to July 2015 at Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad de Granada, under the mentorship of prof. dr. Paloma Cariñanos González from department of Botany. In Slovenia was my supervision prof. dr. Samo Kreft. THANKS: I would sincerely like to thank my prof. dr. Paloma Cariñanos González, for all her patience and professional directions during my work. Also I would like to thank my mentor, prof. dr. Samo Kreft for final comments to finish this thesis. Zahvala gre tudi mojim staršem. Hvala za vašo potrpežljivost ter podporo pri pripravi na zagovor. STATEMENT: I declare that I have done this master thesis independently under supervision of prof. dr. Samo Kreft and co-supervision of prof. dr, Paloma Cariñanos González. Ljubljana, May 2016 Damijana Gregorič President of the Thesis defence committee: prof. dr. Stanislav Gobec, mag. farm Member of the Thesis defence committee: doc. dr. Pegi Ahlin Grabnar, mag. farm III TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. VI LIST OF APPENDIX.............................................................................................................................. VI ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................... VII KEYWORDS ...................................................................................................................................... VIII ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. VIII POVZETEK .......................................................................................................................................... IX KLJUČNE BESEDE ............................................................................................................................... XI 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 DERMATITIS AND OTHER SKIN REACTIONS ........................................................................ 1 1.1.1 ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS ............................................................................... 1 1.1.2 IRRITANT CONTACT DERMATITIS ............................................................................... 3 1.1.3 CONTACT URTICARIA .................................................................................................. 8 1.1.4 PHYTOPHOTODERMATITIS ......................................................................................... 8 2 WORK PLAN .............................................................................................................................. 10 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..................................................................................................... 11 4 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 ALLERGENS AND CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS ...................................................................... 12 4.2 MOST ALLERGENIC PLANTS FAMILIES .............................................................................. 15 4.2.1 Asteraceae or Compositae Family ............................................................................ 15 4.2.2 Jubulaceae Family .................................................................................................... 22 4.2.3 Liliaceae family ......................................................................................................... 22 4.2.4 Alstroemeriaceae Family .......................................................................................... 23 4.2.5 Anacardiaceae Family ............................................................................................... 24 4.2.6 Ginkgoaceae Family.................................................................................................. 27 4.2.7 Proteaceae Family .................................................................................................... 27 4.2.8 Primulaceae family ................................................................................................... 28 4.2.9 Rutaceae family ........................................................................................................ 29 4.2.10 Alliaceae family ........................................................................................................ 30 4.2.11 Cruciferae family (Brassicaceae) .............................................................................. 31 4.2.12 Capparaceae Family ................................................................................................. 32 4.2.13 Araliaceae family ...................................................................................................... 32 4.2.14 Apiaceae family (Umbelliferae) ................................................................................ 33 IV 4.2.15 Solanaceae family ..................................................................................................... 34 4.2.16 Lamiaceae family (Labiatae family) .......................................................................... 35 4.2.17 Moraceae family ....................................................................................................... 36 4.3 PATCH TESTING, MIXTURES ............................................................................................. 37 4.4 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................... 40 5 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................... 44 6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 45 7 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................. 48 V LIST OF TABLES Table I: Common plants causing chemical and mechanical irritant contact dermatitis (2,7) ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Table II: Some examples of plants known to cause phytophotodermatitis (9, 17) ................ 9 Table III: Constituents of two commercial Compositae mixes (29) .................................... 37 Table IV: Distribution of positive reactions to the constituents of Compositae mix 6% pet. in 76 patients with positive reactions to the mix (29) .......................................................... 38 Table V: Results of distribution of positive reactions to the constituents Compositae mix 5% pet. (29) ......................................................................................................................... 38 Table VI: Allergens contained within the plant series (28) ................................................. 39 LIST OF PICTURES Picture 1: Number of plant families and their usage .......................................................... 41 Picture 2: Frequent plant families that cause ACD ............................................................ 42 Picture 3: Number of plant families and allergens ............................................................. 43 LIST OF APPENDIX Appendix 1: Plants responsible for causing allergic contact dermatitis in South Africa (6) 48 Appendix 2: An alphabetical list of plants that can cause urticarial responses (8) ............ 50 VI ABSTRACT Plants have been used since ancient times. Nowadays their popularity is increased, not only as a food or decorative plants but also as herbal medicines and natural cosmetic. Because of that, we are daily in touch with them and it is necessary to know, which are the most harmful plants and allergens and what reactions on the skin they can cause. Allergic contact dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, contact urticaria and phytophotodermatitis are the most typical cutaneous reactions among phytodermatitis. Our main purpose was to make a general overview of plants that can cause allergic skin reactions. We wanted to estimate which plant families are the most allergenic, which occupation are the most exposed to them and which are the possible allergens. We started our research on databases (Scopus, PubMed). Firstly we were searching after the most allergenic plant families. After that we focused on specific plants and case reports. According to the literature we can say that allergic contact dermatitis is mostly generated by Compositae, worldwide known plant family. Anacardiaceae are the next plant family in which we have found more case reports. These plants are found in South and North America, Asia and South Africa. Primulaceae family is also common cause of ACD. Its plants are popular ornamental plants. According to our review,
Recommended publications
  • Inhibition of Helicobacter Pylori and Its Associated Urease by Two Regional Plants of San Luis Argentina
    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(9): 2097-2106 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 9 (2017) pp. 2097-2106 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.258 Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori and Its Associated Urease by Two Regional Plants of San Luis Argentina A.G. Salinas Ibáñez1, A.C. Arismendi Sosa1, F.F. Ferramola1, J. Paredes2, G. Wendel2, A.O. Maria2 and A.E. Vega1* 1Área Microbiología, Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Ejercito de los Andes 950 Bloque I, Primer piso. CP5700, San Luis, Argentina 2Área de Farmacología y Toxicología, Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis. Chacabuco y Pedernera. CP5700, San Luis, Argentina *Corresponding author ABSTRACT The search of alternative anti-Helicobacter pylori agents obtained mainly of medicinal plants is a scientific area of great interest. The antimicrobial effects of Litrahea molleoides K e yw or ds and Aristolochia argentina extracts against sensible and resistant H. pylori strains, were Helicobacter pylori, evaluated in vitro. Also, the urease inhibition activity and the effect on the ureA gene Inhibition urease, expression mRNA was evaluated. The L. molleoides and A. argentinae extracts showed Plants . antimicrobial activity against all strains assayed. Regardless of the extract assayed a decrease of viable count of approximately 2 log units on planktonic cell or established Article Info biofilms in H. pylori strains respect to the control was observed (p<0.05). Also, both Accepted: extracts demonstrated strong urease inhibition activity on sensible H.
    [Show full text]
  • Cintia Luz.Pdf
    Cíntia Luíza da Silva Luz Filogenia e sistemática de Schinus L. (Anacardiaceae), com revisão de um clado endêmico das matas nebulares andinas Phylogeny and systematics of Schinus L. (Anacardiaceae), with revision of a clade endemic to the Andean cloud forests Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, para obtenção de Título de Doutor em Ciências, na Área de Botânica. Orientador: Dr. José Rubens Pirani São Paulo 2017 Luz, Cíntia Luíza da Silva Filogenia e sistemática de Schinus L. (Anacardiaceae), com revisão de um clado endêmico das matas nebulares andinas Número de páginas: 176 Tese (Doutorado) - Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Botânica. 1. Anacardiaceae 2. Schinus 3. Filogenia 4. Taxonomia vegetal I. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Biociências. Departamento de Botânica Comissão julgadora: ______________________________ ______________________________ Prof(a). Dr.(a) Prof(a). Dr.(a) ______________________________ ______________________________ Prof(a). Dr.(a) Prof(a). Dr.(a) _____________________________________ Prof. Dr. José Rubens Pirani Orientador Ao Luciano Luz, pelo entusiasmo botânico, companheirismo e dedicação aos Schinus Esta é a estória. Ia um menino, com os tios, passar dias no lugar onde se construía a grande cidade. Era uma viagem inventada no feliz; para ele, produzia-se em caso de sonho. Saíam ainda com o escuro, o ar fino de cheiros desconhecidos. A mãe e o pai vinham trazê-lo ao aeroporto. A tia e o tio tomavam conta dele, justínhamente. Sorria-se, saudava-se, todos se ouviam e falavam. O avião era da companhia, especial, de quatro lugares. Respondiam-lhe a todas as perguntas, até o piloto conversou com ele.
    [Show full text]
  • VARIABILIDADE INTRA-ESPECÍFICA EM Lithraea Molleoides (Vell.) Eng
    ANA PAULA DE AGUIAR BERGER VARIABILIDADE INTRA-ESPECÍFICA EM Lithraea molleoides (Vell.) Eng. (AROEIRA-BRANCA) A PARTIR DOS PROCESSOS DE GERMINAÇÃO E EMERGÊNCIA Dissertação apresentada à Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, como parte das exigências do Programa de Pós- graduação em Agronomia – Mestrado, área de concentração em Fitotecnia, para obtenção do título de “Mestre”. Orientadora Profª. Drª. Marli A. Ranal Co-orientadora Profª. Drª. Denise Garcia Santana UBERLÂNDIA MINAS GERAIS – BRASIL 2007 ANA PAULA DE ARGUIAR BERGER VARIABILIDADE INTRA-ESPECÍFICA EM Lithraea molleoides (Vell.) Eng. (AROEIRA-BRANCA) A PARTIR DOS PROCESSOS DE GERMINAÇÃO E EMERGÊNCIA Dissertação apresentada à Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, como parte das exigências do Programa de Pós- graduação em Agronomia – Mestrado, área de concentração em Fitotecnia, para obtenção do título de “Mestre”. APROVADA em 26 de fevereiro de 2007. Profª. Drª. Denise Garcia Santana UFU (co-orientadora) Prof. Dr. Carlos Machado dos Santos UFU Profª. Drª. Queila Souza Garcia UFMG Profª. Drª. Marli A. Ranal ICIAG-UFU (Orientadora) UBERLÂNDIA MINAS GERAIS – BRASIL 2007 Dedico, À minha mãe, in memoriam, Ás minhas irmãs, Juliana e Beatriz. AGRADECIMENTOS A Deus, por tudo o que me ofereceu, pela minha vida e pela força para superar cada obstáculo. A minha mãe, Marilda de Aguiar Berger, in memorian, que apesar de partido tão cedo, me ensinou os verdadeiros valores da vida e que quando temos sonhos temos que lutar e superar todos os obstáculos para alcançá-los. Ao meu pai e à Tricia, pelo apoio, atenção e dedicação, fundamentais para o meu crescimento. Apesar da distância, estão sempre presentes, não medindo esforços para me apoiarem e me incentivarem na busca de novas conquistas.
    [Show full text]
  • Dermatosis Due to Plants (Phytodermatosis)*
    479 REVISÃO L Dermatoses provocadas por plantas (fitodermatoses) * Dermatosis due to plants (phytodermatosis) Vitor Manoel Silva dos Reis 1 Resumo: As dermatoses causadas por plantas são relativamente comuns no nosso meio e podem ocorrer por diversos mecanismos patogênicos. São descritas dermatoses por trauma físico, por ação farmacológica, mediadas por IgE, por irritação, por ação conjunta da luz e por sensibilização. Também são descritas na introdução desta revisão as pseudofitodermatoses causadas por elementos veiculados pelas plantas e, por isso, aparentemente causadas pelas plantas. Palavras-chave: Alergia e imunologia; Dermatite; Dermatopatias; Plantas Abstract: Dermatosis caused by plants is relatively common and may occur by various pathogenic mechanisms. Dermatitis due to physical trauma, pharmacological action, irritation, sensitization, mediated by IgE and induced by light are described. Pseudophytodermatosis caused by plant-delivered elements is also described in the introduction to this work. Keywords: Allergy and immunology; Dermatitis; Plants; Skin diseases INTRODUÇÃO Dermatoses provocadas por plantas Também é preciso lembrar que há dermatoses (Fitodermatoses) que ocorrem como resultado de contato com as plan- Fitodermatoses são dermatoses causadas por tas, mas que, na realidade, têm como causa algum con- plantas. Na maioria das vezes, são causadas pelo conta- taminante presente na planta, como inseticidas, agro- to direto e apenas por isso, mas, eventualmente, ocor- tóxicos e artrópodes contaminantes, como acontece rem
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting the Future Distribution of Ara Rubrogenys, an Endemic Endangered Bird Species of the Andes, Taking Into Account Trophic Interactions
    diversity Article Predicting the Future Distribution of Ara rubrogenys, an Endemic Endangered Bird Species of the Andes, Taking into Account Trophic Interactions Alain Hambuckers 1,* , Simon de Harenne 1,2 , Eberth Rocha Ledezma 3, Lilian Zúñiga Zeballos 1,4 and Louis François 2 1 Behavioural Biology Lab, Unit of Research SPHERES, University of Liège, Quai Van Beneden 22, , [email protected] (S.d.H.); [email protected] (L.Z.Z.) 2 Modelling of Climate and Biogeochemical Cycles, Unit of Research SPHERES, University of Liège, Sart Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium; [email protected] 3 Centro de Biodiversidad y Genética, Facultad de Ciencas y Tecnología, Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolivia; [email protected] 4 Museo de Historia Natural Alcide d’Orbigny, Cochabamba, Bolivia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Species distribution models (SDMs) are commonly used with climate only to predict animal distribution changes. This approach however neglects the evolution of other components of the niche, like food resource availability. SDMs are also commonly used with plants. This also suffers limitations, notably an inability to capture the fertilizing effect of the rising CO2 concentration strengthening resilience to water stress. Alternatively, process-based dynamic vegetation models (DVMs) respond to CO2 concentration. To test the impact of the plant modelling method to model Citation: Hambuckers, A.; de plant resources of animals, we studied the distribution of a Bolivian macaw, assuming that, under Harenne, S.; Rocha Ledezma, E.; future climate, DVMs produce more conservative results than SDMs. We modelled the bird with an Zúñiga Zeballos, L.; François, L.
    [Show full text]
  • New 5-Alkenyl Resorcinols from Lithraea Molleoides (Vell). Eng
    American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2020, 11, 861-868 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ajps ISSN Online: 2158-2750 ISSN Print: 2158-2742 New 5-Alkenyl Resorcinols from Lithraea molleoides (Vell). Eng. Alejandra Catalano1,2, Beatriz Lantaño3, Lucas Fabián2,4, Paula López1,2 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Cátedra de Farmacognosia, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina 2CONICET, Instituto de la Química y Metabolismo del Fármaco (IQUIMEFA), Cuidad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Cátedra de Química Orgánica, Cuidad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina 4Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Cátedra de Química Medicinal, Cuidad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina How to cite this paper: Catalano, A., Abstract Lantaño, B., Fabián, L. and López, P. (2020) New 5-Alkenyl Resorcinols from Lithraea Lithraea molleoides (Anacardiaceae) is a tree that grows in South America in- molleoides (Vell). Eng. American Journal cluding Southern Brazil, Southern, and Eastern Bolivia, Southern Paraguay, of Plant Sciences, 11, 861-868. Northern, and Central Argentina. Infusions, decoctions, or tinctures from its https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.116062 aerial parts (leaves, buds, and young stems) are employed in ethnomedicine Received: May 10, 2019 mainly against respiratory, and digestive inflammations and illnesses. Anti- Accepted: June 26, 2020 bacterial, antiviral, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antinociceptive activ- Published: June 29, 2020 ities, among others, have been reported for L. molleoides. Many of its biolog- Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and ical activities have been associated with the reported presence of 5-alkenyl Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Persistence of the Use of Medicinal Plants in Rural Communities of the Western Arid Chaco [Córdoba, Argentina]
    80 The Open Complementary Medicine Journal, 2010, 2, 80-89 Open Access Persistence of the Use of Medicinal Plants in Rural Communities of the Western Arid Chaco [Córdoba, Argentina] Cecilia Trillo1, Bárbara Arias Toledo*,1,2, Leonardo Galetto1,2 and Sonia Colantonio1,2 1Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina 2CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Argentina Abstract: Rural communities have complex strategies for health conservation: the use of local pharmacopoeia, visits to “curanderos” [traditional healers] and the use of the scientific official system of medicine. Through 129 semi-structured surveys in 6 villages of the Arid Chaco forest of western Cordoba Province 151 plants species (117 natives and 34 exotics) were registered for diverse uses: digestive, external frictions, respiratory, diuretic, circulatory, sedative, magic, feminine, etc. Besides, differential use by men and women was registered associated to particular cultural roles. 90% of the species were previously registered for the region by several botanists, folklorists and geographers. Thus, a historical continuum in the knowledge of medicinal plants can be pointed out. This knowledge on medicinal plants seems to be part of the culture of the “criollos”, inhabitants of the rural areas of Argentina traditionally dedicated to stockbreeding. Although same socio-cultural changes occurred in the last 100 years, still persist an ethno-medic system related to a comprehensive treatment of patients, which try the disorders simultaneously in physical, emotional, mental, spiritual and environmental levels. Keywords: Argentinean chaco forest, knowledge persistence, medicinal plants, ethno botany. INTRODUCTION leged respecting to those of the West Arid region.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny and Chromosomal Evolution of Endemic Species of Sri Lankan Anacardiaceae
    J.Natn.Sci.Foundation Sri Lanka 2020 48 (3): 289 - 303 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v48i3.9368 RESEARCH ARTICLE Molecular phylogeny and chromosomal evolution of endemic species of Sri Lankan Anacardiaceae M Ariyarathne 1,2 , D Yakandawala 1,2* , M Barfuss 3, J Heckenhauer 4,5 and R Samuel 3 1 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya. 2 Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya. 3 Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Austria. 4 LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE‐TBG), Frankfurt, Germany. 5 Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Entomology III, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. Received: 14 August 2019; Revised: 29 January 2020; Accepted: 29 May 2020 Abstract: Family Anacardiaceae comprises 70 genera and approximately 985 species distributed worldwide. INTRODUCTION Sri Lanka harbours 19 species in seven genera, among these 15 are endemics. This study focuses on regionally restricted Family Anacardiaceae R. Br., the cashew family, contains endemics and native Anacardiaceae species, which have not 70 genera harbouring 985 species of trees, shrubs and been investigated before at molecular and cytological level. subshrubs. The members are well known for causing Nuclear rDNA ITS and plastid matK regions were sequenced contact dermatitis reactions. They occupy a considerable for ten species, having nine endemics and one native, and fraction of the tropical fl ora dispersed in tropical, incorporated into the existing sequence data for phylogenetic subtropical and temperate regions holding Malaysian analyses. The topologies resulting from maximum parsimony, region as the center of diversity (Li, 2007; Pell et al ., maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference are congruent.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty Advances in Agroforestry
    Advances in Agroforestry 12 Florencia Montagnini Editor Integrating Landscapes: Agroforestry for Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty Advances in Agroforestry Volume 12 Series editor P.K. Ramachandran Nair, Gainesville, USA Aims and Scope Agroforestry, the purposeful growing of trees and crops in interacting combinations, began to attain prominence in the late 1970s, when the international scientific community embraced its potentials in the tropics and recognized it as a practice in search of science. During the 1990s, the relevance of agroforestry for solving problems related to deterioration of family farms, increased soil erosion, surface and ground water pollution, and decreased biodiversity was recognized in the industrialized nations too. Thus, agroforestry is now receiving increasing attention as a sustainable land-management option the world over because of its ecological, economic, and social attributes. Consequently, the knowledge-base of agroforestry is being expanded at a rapid rate as illustrated by the increasing number and quality of scientific publications of various forms on different aspects of agroforestry. Making full and efficient use of this upsurge in scientific agroforestry is both a challenge and an opportunity to the agroforestry scientific community. In order to help prepare themselves better for facing the challenge and seizing the opportunity, agroforestry scientists need access to synthesized information on multi-dimensional aspects of scientific agroforesty. The aim of this new book-series, Advances in Agroforestry, is to offer state-of- the art synthesis of research results and evaluations relating to different aspects of agroforestry. Its scope is broad enough to encompass any and all aspects of agrofor- estry research and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Anacardiaceae): with Taxonomic Notes
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2015) 87(3): 1711-1716 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140404 www.scielo.br/aabc Initial development of the endocarp in Lithraea brasiliensis Marchand (Anacardiaceae): with taxonomic notes JOÃO M.S. DE OLIVEIRA1 and JORGE E.A. MARIATH2 1Laboratório de Botânica Estrutural, Depto. de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria/UFSM, Avenida Roraima, 1000, Prédio 16, Sala 3253, 97105-900 Santa Maria, RS, Brasil 2Laboratório de Anatomia Vegetal, Depto. de Botânica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul/UFRGS, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil Manuscript received on August 14, 2014; accepted for publication on December 14, 2014 ABSTRACT Investigation into the initial developmental stages of a given structure is fundamental for precise characterization as well as for comparative analysis in relation to other taxa when homologies are established. For the Anacardiaceae family, investigations of the initial development of the pericarp or its basic histological sites, the epicarp, mesocarp and endocarp, are relevant since these regions are of taxonomic and phylogenetic importance. The initial stages of endocarp development in Lithraea brasiliensis were studied using light microscopy. In L. brasiliensis, the fruits are of the drupe type. The endocarp originates exclusively in the epidermis of the locular cavity and is composed of only three strata. The crystalliferous layer, typical in fruits of the Anacardiaceae family, originates in the carpelar mesophyll and runs adjacent to the outermost layer of the endocarp. The endocarp in Lithraea brasiliensis is of the Anacardium type.
    [Show full text]
  • Antifeedant Effect of Plant Extracts on the Poultry Pest Alphitobius Diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): an Exploratory Study
    Artículo Article www.biotaxa.org/RSEA. ISSN 1851-7471 (online) Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 79(4): 23-30, 2020 Antifeedant effect of plant extracts on the poultry pest Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): an exploratory study FERNÁNDEZ, Nahuel F.1, DEFAGÓ, María T.1, PALACIOS, Sara M.2 & ARENA, Julieta S.1,* 1 Centro de Investigaciones Entomológicas de Córdoba (CIEC, UNC), Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV, CONICET-UNC) Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Córdoba, Argentina. *E-mail: [email protected] 2 Laboratorio de Química Fina y Productos Naturales, IRNASUS-CONICET-Universidad Católica de Córdoba. Córdoba, Argentina. Received 29 - VII - 2020 | Accepted 25 - XI - 2020 | Published 28 - XII - 2020 https://doi.org/10.25085/rsea.790404 Efecto antialimentario de extractos vegetales sobre la plaga avícola Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): un estudio exploratorio RESUMEN. En este estudio exploratorio se evaluó la actividad antialimentaria de nueve extractos etanólicos de plantas nativas de la región central de Argentina sobre Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), buscando alternativas de manejo de bajo impacto ambiental para esta plaga. Adultos de A. diaperinus fueron expuestos a alimento tratado con los extractos para evaluar si el comportamiento de alimentación y la supervivencia se ven alterados. La supervivencia de los adultos no fue afectada por ninguno de los extractos. Sin embargo, los extractos de Gaillardia megapotamica, Vernonanthura nudiflora, Baccharis artemisioides, Lithraea molleoides, y Ambrosia artemisiifolia generaron un efecto disuasivo fuerte (92-96%) sobre la alimentación del coleóptero. Los demás extractos evaluados afectaron ligeramente (50-55%) el consumo de alimento. Los extractos de G. megapotamica y B. artemisioides se administraron en el alimento del quinto estadio larval para determinar si afectan la supervivencia, el comportamiento de alimentación y el peso de las formas inmaduras.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithraea Australis (Berry) Comb
    Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 266 (2019) 1–11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/revpalbo Lithraea australis (Berry) comb. nov. (Anacardiaceae) from the upper section of Ñirihuau Formation (middle Miocene), Patagonia Mauro G. Passalia a,b,e,⁎, Nicolás Caviglia c,e, Ezequiel I. Vera c,d,e a Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (INIBIOMA, CONICET-UNCo), Av. de los Pioneros 2350 (8400), S.C. de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina b Sede Alto Valle y Valle Medio, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Isidro Lobo 516, Gral. Roca, Río Negro, Argentina c Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, CONICET. Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Buenos Aires, Argentina d Área de Paleontología, Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón 2, Ciudad Universitaria (C1428EGA), Buenos Aires, Argentina e Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina article info abstract Article history: The first records of fossil plants from the Ñirihuau Formation (middle Miocene) were published by Edward Berry Received 18 October 2018 at the beginning of the last century. They consist of a small collection of leaf imprints obtained from the southern Received in revised form 11 March 2019 margin of the Ñirihuau River valley, western Río Negro, Argentina. Based on these records, Berry described a few Accepted 1 April 2019 ferns, gymnosperms and angiosperms. Among these impressions, stand out two specimens that Berry Available online 04 April 2019 interpreted as pinnate leaves of Cycadaceae (now Zamiaceae) that he assigned to the new species Zamia australis Berry. However, after a review of Berry's original materials of Z.
    [Show full text]