Some Dam – Hydro News
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SSoommee DDaamm –– HHyyddrroo NNeewwss and Other Stuff i 1/02/2009 Quote of Note: “Washington DC is to lying what Wisconsin is to cheese.” - - Dennis Miller “No nation was ever drunk when wine was cheap.” - - Thomas Jefferson Ron’s wine pick of the week: Rosemont “Diamond Label” Shiraz 2006 OOtthheerr SSttuuffffff::: (There’s an easy solution to this problem. If the City agrees to all liabilities should an accident occur, then the area can be open to the public.) By Kate Ramunni, 12/23/2008, ConnPost.com SHELTON -- The owner of the Shelton Canal Co. is again appealing to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to relocate the portion of his property that is open to the public. As part of the company's license, and as a condition of the zoning approval it received more than two decades ago, a portion of the property at the end of Canal Street must be open to the public for recreation. It has over the years been used for fishing. McCallum Industries co-owner Joseph Szarmach has filed a request for another hearing on the issue, a month after FERC reversed its initial approval of the relocation. That action came after the state Department of Environmental Protection appealed the initial approval. "We are going through this process to amend our license because it is standard procedure; however, we continue to believe it is our right to close the canal area due to safety concerns," Szarmach said, most notably its proximity to the dam. "The DEP, at the city's urging, is advocating full and unfettered access to a pool of water into which we dump 34,000 gallons of water per second," Szarmach said. "We believe this is reckless." He also believes that the city is trying to crowbar him into keeping the canal as privately owned public open space, he said, particularly for the hundreds of residents who will be living in the new housing being built as part of the Canal Street redevelopment project. Szarmach had previously planned on filling and developing the canal in order to raise the funds for a $2 million fish ladder the DEP is requiring him to install at the dam. "We understand the city wants our property to be an undeveloped amenity for the Canal Street developer's new residents and will do and say anything to make that happen," he said. Szarmach has outlined his objections to city official's actions in a blog at www.stopabusivegovernment.org. It's not a matter of an abuse of power, but a desire for McCallum to uphold an agreement struck years ago, said Planning and Zoning Commission member Leon J. Sylvester, who was chairman of the commission when the canal approval was granted to Szarmach's grandfather. "We made the deal years ago that the area would be open to the public for access to the river," he said. "I don't know why he is trying to create the idea that this is abuse," Sylvester said. "This is a deal that was struck openly and received well with his grandfather -- he was happy with it and we were happy with it." Szarmach has contended that the zoning approval isn't legally enforceable. Zoning Administrator Rick Schultz has requested an opinion from the city's corporation counsel. Neither Schultz nor City Attorney Tom Welch could be reached for comment Tuesday. 1 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu DDaammss (Buffalo Creek Dam Failure 2-26-1972 - The following web page is worth your attention: http://www.herald-dispatch.com/multimedia/galleries/news/x1107815709/Gallery-The-Buffalo- Creek-Flood) The photos are mostly black and white which is a stark reminder of the125 people that lost their lives, the 1,100 injured and the 4,000 left homeless. (Pretty messy stuff that steam plant sludge) Aerial footage: TVA storage pond breach in Harriman December 22, 2008, knoxnews.com Footage shot from a helicopter of the area affected by the TVA pond breach. http://www.knoxnews.com/videos/detail/aerial-footage-tva-storage-pond-breach-harriman/ (There’s an old axiom. If you’re going to learn something the hard way, it’s best that no one loses their life when you get a wake up call. P.S. In the last Newsletter, I mentioned that TVA had a similar failure in the 1960’s. My memory failed me and I apologize to TVA. The failure I recalled actually was on the Clinch River in 1967 when a fly ash containment pond failed at an Appalachian Power Company coal-fired power plant near Carbo, VA. An interesting note on that earlier failure - the failed dam was designed by one of world’s most famous geotech engineers.) Sludge spill stirs concerns in Kentucky By Cassondra Kirby Mullins, Lexington Herald-Leader, Dec. 24, 2008 A day after a massive coal sludge break in Tennessee covered hundreds of acres in ashy waste, Kentucky environmentalists and leaders said they will continue pushing for legislation to require emergency action plans in case of similar failures in their state. Monday's break in Tennessee released millions of yards of dark gray mud that toppled power lines, covered roads and railroad tracks and ruptured a gas line, according to The Associated Press. No one was seriously hurt. The break occurred at a retention pond used by the Tennessee Valley Authority. The pond held the ash generated by the coal-burning Kingston Steam Plant in Harriman, about 50 miles west of Knoxville. The break occurred at a retention pond used by the Tennessee Valley Authority. The pond held the ash generated by the coal-burning Kingston Steam Plant in Harriman, about 50 miles west of Knoxville. "This event in Tennessee should remind our legislators that the public is at serious risk," said Stephanie McSpirit, an associate professor of sociology at Eastern Kentucky University. "People living downstream from these types of impoundments need to be protected. Maybe this will be our final wake-up call." Kentucky doesn't require emergency plans for its coal-company impoundments, where a break could kill people or cause significant damage to facilities such as schools and power substations, nor does it require such plans for nearly 400 water dams in the state that are rated as high or moderate hazards. Environmentalists and Kentucky legislators began pushing to develop a system of monitoring such structures, as well as notifying residents when a break occurred, after a massive spill in Martin County in October 2000. Then, more than 300 million gallons of thick slurry broke through an impoundment near Inez, flooding miles of creeks, rivers and bottomland with black sludge. No one was killed, but wildlife suffered and water systems as far away as Ashland were threatened. While Martin County residents were upset about the damage to water supplies and fish from the spill, they also told a student-faculty research team from EKU, which was lead by McSpirit, that they should have received notice that the sludge was headed their way. The spill began an effort to require emergency action plans for Kentucky, even though the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration has recommended such plans for coal-slurry and water impoundments since 1994. 2 Copy obtained from the National Performance of Dams Program: http://npdp.stanford.edu In addition, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and dam-safety experts for years have urged plans for all high- and moderate-hazard dams. Dam-safety advocates say it's just common sense to make plans in case a dam fails. "It is just a basic public-safety measure, especially given what has happened in Tennessee and Martin County and other places," McSpirit said. "Even in the Cumberland area and the Wolfe Creek Dam there, we have an issue with aging infrastructure and the people need to be protected." But legislation proposed during the past two sessions to require such plans in Kentucky have failed. One potential issue with the proposals has been the cost to dam owners. Detailed mapping of the area that could be flooded in a dam break would require engineering work, Hank List, deputy secretary of the Energy and Environment Cabinet, said Tuesday. "There would be a sizable cost to all owners, from coal companies that own slurry impoundments, as well as local governments and farm owners," List said. "Nobody opposes the need for such a plan, but nobody could produce the thousands of dollars it would take." However, state Sen. Ray Jones II, D-Pikeville, who filed a resolution during the last legislative session requiring emergency plans, said he will continue working with lawmakers in the next session to come up with a consensus. "What eventually will happen, I'm afraid, is we will have a catastrophic failure, whether it be a coal slurry impoundment or a water dam, and at the present time we don't have a plan in place to handle it," Jones said. Jones said many people live in communities with slurry impoundments and don't even realize it. According to the Division of Mine Reclamation and Enforcement, there are 113 impoundments for slurry or water at coal operations in Kentucky, 91 of them rated as either a high or a significant hazard. In addition, there are 1,064 dams in Kentucky that the state inspects. Of those, 395 are high- or moderate-hazard dams. The dams have a range of owners, including cities and government agencies, home owners' associations, golf courses and farmers. The state Department for Natural Resources says none of the coal impoundments is in imminent danger of failing.