UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO the Taxation Tango: State Capacity in Argentina's Provinces a Dissertation Submitted in Pa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO the Taxation Tango: State Capacity in Argentina's Provinces a Dissertation Submitted in Pa UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Taxation Tango: State Capacity in Argentina’s Provinces A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Melissa Ziegler Rogers Committee in Charge: Mathew McCubbins, Co-Chair Peter Smith, Co-Chair Gary Cox Paul Drake Carlos Waisman 2010 Copyright Melissa Ziegler Rogers, 2010 All Rights Reserved The Dissertation of Melissa Ziegler Rogers is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION Dissertations do not come easily or quickly. I appreciate the patience of my family, friends, and husband from whom I sought advice and support. I also thank them for helping me by editing drafts, offering constructive criticism, and taking care of business on the home front while I trekked through Argentina. My advisors have given me funding, opportunities for research and publication and invaluable guidance in my academic pursuits. I thank my parents most of all for pushing me to succeed in academia and for encouraging me at my most doubtful moments. They are my favorite people in the world and I only wish that my Mom were still in this world to celebrate with us. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ................................................................................................................... iii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents .................................................................................................................v List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments............................................................................................................ viii Vita ..................................................................................................................................... ix Abstract .............................................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Politicians’ Incentives and Bureaucratic Quality .............................................21 Chapter 3: Identifying and Measuring State Capacity .......................................................47 Chapter 4: When the Well Dries ........................................................................................78 Chapter 5: Governor’s Calculations.................................................................................113 Chapter 6: Conclusion......................................................................................................166 Appendix ..........................................................................................................................184 References ........................................................................................................................188 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Sub-national Spending in Latin American Countries……………………. 10 Figure 4.1 Own-Source Revenues, Percentage of Total Provincial Spending………. 86 Figure 4.2 Mean Provincial Taxes (% of GPP), Change at 1991……………………. 96 Figure 5.1 Strong Party vs. Capable Bureaucracy Theoretical Expectations………... 141 Figure 5.2 Compliance with the Fiscal Pact of 1993, by Party……………………… 142 Figure 5.3 Compliance with the Fiscal Pact of 1993, by Capabilities………………. 144 Figure 5.4 Automobile Tax Compliance, by Capabilities…………………………… 147 Figure 5.5 Compliance with Real Estate Valuation…………………………………. 151 Figure 5.6 Non-Compliance with Real Estate Tax Reform…………………………. 154 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: State Capacity Outcomes Depending on Capabilities and Will…………. 31 Table 4.1 State Capacity Outcomes After Convertibility…………………………... 80 Table 4.2 Changes to Provincial Finances After Convertibility……………………. 89 Table 4.3 Private Loan Per Capita Groupings……………………………………… 95 Table 4.4 Total Taxes, Before and After 1991……………………………………… 97 Table 4.5 Changes in Total Taxation, By Province………………………………… 98 Table 4.6 Full Model Results……………………………………………………….. 99 Table 4.7 Property Taxes…………………………………………………………… 102 Table 4.8 Automobile Taxes………………………………………………………... 102 Table 4.9 Stamp Taxes……………………………………………………………… 103 Table 4.10 Difference in Means, Property and Sales Tax Per Capita Revenue…….. 104 Table 4.11 Gross Business Taxes…………………………………………………... 105 Table 4.12 Tax to Loan Ratios……………………………………………………… 109 Table 4.13 Coparticipation “Collateral” for Network Groups……………………… 111 Table 5.1 Fiscal Pact of 1993- Major Components………………………………… 123 Table 5.2 Partisan Composition of Provincial Governors………………………….. 138 Appendix Table 5.1a: Fiscal Pact of 1993 Components……………………………………….. 184 Table 5.2a: Tax Stipulations of the Pact of 1993—Obligations of the Provinces….. 185 Table 5.3c: Automobile Valuation Non-Compliance, by Capabilities and Party….. 186 Table 5.4d: Real Estate Valuation Compliance, by Capabilities…………………... 186 Table 5.5e: Provincial Compliance with the 1993 Fiscal Pact……………………... 187 vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Peter Smith, Mathew McCubbins, and Paul Drake for their guidance in the Ph.D. progress and their assistance with my dissertation. The research for this dissertation was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Dissertation Research Grant and the Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies at UCSD. viii VITA 2001 Bachelor of Arts, Brown University 2001-2003 Vera Institute of Justice 2003-2009 Graduate Research Assistant, University of California, San Diego 2005 Master of Arts, University of California, San Diego 2005-2010 Teaching Assistant, University of California, San Diego 2006-2010 Adjunct Instructor, University of California, San Diego 2010 Doctor of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego PUBLICATIONS “Political and Technical Barriers to Policy Reform: A Comparison of US and Argentine Tax Reform.” In Elgar, Edward ed., Comparative Development. (with Nicholas Weller) 2010 “Tax Man Cometh: Income Taxation as a Measure of State Capacity.” In review, Comparative International Development. (with Nicholas Weller), March 2010 “Democracias liberal e illiberal na América Latina.” Opinião Pública 15(2): November 2009 (with Peter Smith) “Illiberal and Liberal Democracy in Latin America.” In William Smith, ed. Latin American Democratic Transformations. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. (with Peter Smith), 2008 “Illiberal and Liberal Democracy in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society. Volume 50, Spring 2008. (with Peter Smith) “Governmental Performance and Political Regimes: Latin America in Comparative Perspective 1990-2004.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy. Spring 2008. (with Peter Smith) “Governmental Performance and Political Regimes” in After the Third Wave, Taiwan Think Tank, eds. Forthcoming. (with Peter Smith) From Peace to Governance: Police Reform and the International Community, Washington, D.C.: Washington Office on Latin America, 2002. ix FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Comparative Politics Secondary Field: American Politics x ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Taxation Tango: State Capacity in Argentina’s Provinces By Melissa Ziegler Rogers Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, San Diego, 2010 Professor Mathew McCubbins, Co-Chair Professor Peter Smith, Co-Chair Most states of the world are ineffective at implementing policy. State capacity to perform these tasks is dependent both on the will of politicians who make laws and the technical capabilities of bureaucracies who carry them out. Existing measures of state capacity do not effectively separate these two sources of capacity failures, leading to uncertainty about the condition of policy implementation in most states. I develop a measure of state capacity based on types of taxes that better captures the theoretical foundations of state capacity. Additionally, in two empirical chapters, I build research designs that enable us to identify politicians’ efforts at encouraging policy implementation and observe the weaknesses of bureaucracies to collect revenue and deliver services. Most studies of state capacity understand the problems of bureaucracies to be rooted in politics but do not consider that the reverse might be true—that weak xi bureaucracies could themselves affect the political system. I theorize about the role of bureaucracies in the operation and design of political institutions. Specifically, political parties are not able to impose collective discipline and provide inducements for their members in the absence of a quality bureaucracy able to come through on their promises. Parties are thus unable to encourage individual politicians to overcome incentives to behave in short-sighted or localized ways. These innovations in the measurement of state capacity and the analysis of feedback from technical capabilities to party systems are examined in the context of Argentina during its reform era in the 1990s. xii Chapter 1 Introduction As the twentieth century draws to a close, the state will remain center stage, but increasingly it will be the state’s difficulties
Recommended publications
  • James F. Thrasher Education Current Positions & Affiliations
    JAMES F. THRASHER [email protected] (803)777-4862 EDUCATION PhD University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill May 2005 Health Behavior & Health Education School of Public Health MS State University of New York, Buffalo May 2000 Epidemiology MA State University of New York, Buffalo May 1994 Cultural Anthropology BA University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill May 1990 Psychology CURRENT POSITIONS & AFFILIATIONS Professor 2018-present Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior 915 Greene Street, Discovery I, Room 534D Arnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208 USA Deputy Director, Global Health Initiatives 2016-present Arnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA Researcher and Visiting Professor 2003-present Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública Av. Universidad #655, Col. Sta. Ma. Ahuacatitlán Cuernavaca, Morelos CP 62100 México Research Affiliate 2007-present Walker Institute of International and Area Studies University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA Research Affiliate 2008-present Center for Research in Nutrition & Health Disparities University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA JF THRASHER Faculty Affiliate 2008-present Prevention Research Center University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA Affiliate Researcher 2012- present Hollings Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA Adjunct Associate Professor 2012- present Department of Public Health & Health Systems University of Waterloo,
    [Show full text]
  • Property Rights and Political Engagement
    Legitimizing the State or a Grievance?: Property Rights and Political Engagement Jacob Kopas Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 c 2019 Jacob Kopas All rights reserved ABSTRACT Legitimizing the State or a Grievance?: Property Rights and Political Engagement Jacob Kopas Can a right, as an abstract yet powerful symbol of a legitimate claim, influence individual political behavior independent of the underlying entitlement the right represents? Or are rights merely rhetorical proxies for distributional struggles? This dissertation examines whether the for- mal recognition of a right|in particular, a formal property right to land|can empower political engagement. I construct a theoretical framework for how legal property rights influence political behavior around two central claims. First, I argue that legal rights have an impact that goes be- yond expectations of economic value or tenure security. Legal rights are powerful symbols that also legitimize claim-making and empower rights-bearers to engage in politics. In this sense, legal rights not only provide the rights-bearer with a material entitlement (i.e. an increase in economic value or material endowment), but also a political entitlement in the form of a greater legitimacy in demands for protection and benefits from the state. This increased sense of legitimacy, in turn, can spill over to influence political behavior more generally by incentivizing political participation and claim-making. I refer to this mechanism as the \symbolic effect" of rights. My second claim is that this empowering, symbolic effect is strongest where property pro- tections are weakest and underlying rights most vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, June 1941
    VL AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE VOL. 18, NO. 6 JOURNAL JUNE, 1941 v. g ' V. '• .. ■ "-r» ■ t i. ¥• "-•#3 One of the greatest expansion programs in history —three huge plants at Buffalo, Columbus and St. Louis, in addition to present facilities—will speed Curtiss-Wright production of many types of military and naval aircraft. In the Buffalo plant alone, Curtiss is already build¬ ing 10 formidable pursuits a day for the U. S. Army Air Corps and Great Britain, in addition to other types for the Army and Navy. The total floor area of the airplane divisions is being expanded from approximately 1,000,000 sq. ft. to 4,700,000 sq. ft. — personnel from 13,000 to 45,000 — to give Curtiss-Wright unequalled facilities for airplane defense production. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION AIRPLANE DIVISION, BUFFALO PLANTS CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION AIRPLANE DIVISION, COLUMBUS PLANT CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION AIRPLANE DIVISION, ST. LOUIS PLANT CONTENTS JUNE, 1941 Cover Picture: Line-up of medium tanks See page 325. The Mechanized Force in Warfare By Janies G. Simonds 305 History of the Consulate General at London By the late Percy R. Broemcl 309 Via Diplomatic Courier By Jane Wilson 312 Mediterranean View 314 Scenes in Iraq 316 Diplomatic Immunity? Exterritoriality By G. Bie Ravndal 318 Whether your car is travelling a Bur¬ mese jungle road or a boulevard in F.S.O. Training School 321 Buenos Aires, comprehensive automo¬ Editors’ Column 322 bile insurance is essential for security Retirement Legislation and peace of mind. There is personal effects insurance, too, and other usual News from the Department and unusual coverages for practically By Reginald P.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Sentiments and Material Interests
    Moral Sentiments and Material Interests The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life edited by Herbert Gintis, Samuel Bowles, Robert Boyd, and Ernst Fehr The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England (V7(M) 24/2/05 16:13) MIT/U J-1147 Gintis AC1:(CKN)21/2/2005 Pal_L (0).27.02.04 (6"Â9") pp. i–xii FM_P (p. iii) ( 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any elec- tronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] or write to Special Sales Department, The MIT Press, 5 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Palatino on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong, and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Moral sentiments and material interests : the foundations of cooperation in economic life / edited by Herbert Gintis . [et al.]. p. cm. — (Economic learning and social evolution ; 6) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-07252-1 (alk. paper) 1. Cooperation. 2. Game theory. 3. Economics—Sociological aspects. I. Gintis, Herbert. II. MIT Press series on economic learning and social evolution ; v. 6. HD2961.M657 2004 3300.0105193—dc22 2004055175 10987654321 (V7(M) 24/2/05 16:13) MIT/U J-1147 Gintis AC1:(CKN)21/2/2005 Pal_L (0).27.02.04 (6"Â9") pp.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE Robert F
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20530, phone (202) 514–2000 http://www.usdoj.gov LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General; born in Greensboro, NC, education: Harvard College, 1981; Harvard Law School, 1984; professional: Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, 1990–1999; United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, 1999–2001, 2010–2015; partner with law firm of Hogan and Hartson L.L.P., 2002–2010; nominated by President Barack Obama to become the Attorney General of the United States on November 8, 2014 and was sworn in on April 27, 2015. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RFK Main Justice Building, Room 5111, phone (202) 514–2001 Attorney General.—Loretta E. Lynch. Chief of Staff and Counselor to the Attorney General.—Sharon Werner, room 5115, 514– 3892. Deputy Chief of Staff and Counselor to the Attorney General.—Carolyn Pokorny, room 5112, 616–2372. Counselors to the Attorney General: Denise Cheung, room 5116, 305–7378; Eric Feigin, room 5119, 514–9798; Paige Herwig, room 5214, 305–8674; Channing Phillips, room 5224, 514–4969. White House Liaison and Counselor to the Attorney General.—Shirlethia Franklin, room 5110, 514–9665. Director of Advance.—Meki Bracken, room 5131, 514–6333. Special Assistant and Scheduler to the Attorney General.—Christina Sivret, room 5127, 514–4195. Confidential Assistant.—Bessie Meadows, room 5111, 514–2001. OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL RFK Main Justice Building, Room 4111, phone (202) 514–2101 Deputy Attorney General.—Sally Quillian Yates, room 4111. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.—Matthew S.
    [Show full text]