Sustainable Tourism Enhancement in Nepal's Protected Areas Public Disclosure Authorized

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainable Tourism Enhancement in Nepal's Protected Areas Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Tourism Enhancement in Nepal's Protected Areas Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Framework Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized National Trust for Nature Conservation GPO Box 3712, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal May 2020 Executive Summary 1. Description of the Project: Tourism is one of the major contributors to the sustainable economy of Nepal. The direct contribution of the tourism sector in the national GDP was at 4% in 2017 and is forecasted to rise by 3.8% per annum to reach 4.2% in 2028 (World Travel and Tourism Council, 2018). Despite tremendous growth potential in tourism sector, Nepal stands as a low-cost tourist destination with much lower daily tourist spending than the regional average. This is a high time for Nepal to think about and harness high value nature-based tourism. Nature based tourism is a key driver of Nepal's tourism, providing the sector both comparative and competitive advantages in the unique setting of rich topographic, biological and cultural diversity. In this context, the World Bank is supporting GoN to implement the project entitled “Sustainable Tourism Enhancement in Nepal’s Protected Areas (STENPA)". Project Destinations: The project focuses on areas with Nature-Based Tourism (NBT) potential with the aim of piloting a sustainable tourism approach that can be replicated across Nepal’s protected areas (PAs). The project destinations include PA at their core, nearby gateway cities and surrounding areas with NBT potential, and has identified six PAs as the initial project destinations (Bardia, Banke Shukla Phanta and Rara National Parks, and their buffer zones; and Annapurna and Manaslu conservation Areas). Additional areas may be added as project destinations during implementation, subject to the selection criteria. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve the sustainability, inclusiveness and value generation of nature-based tourism in selected destinations. The project has five components: Component 1: Improving destination management, planning and coordination, Component 2: Enhancing infrastructure for access, environmental management and tourism diversification, Component 3: Adapting tourism products and providing economic opportunities in tourism-related value chain, Component 4: Project management, monitoring and evaluation, and Component 5: Contingency emergency response (CERC). Under these components, the project will invest in variety of activities, which may be placed into three different group. Group I will include TA support to policy, regulations, plans and programs such as sustainable tourism development strategy for PAs, updating of PA Management Plans, landscape zonation development and DVIPs. Group II include activities to strengthen capacity and institutions such as improvements of ICTs, access to finance and training and awareness programs. Investment in physical infrastructures such as road upgrading works, construction of culverts and helipads, trekking trails fall under Group III. 2. Overview of ESMF: This ESMF has been developed as part of project preparation to ensure sustainable preservation of natural and cultural heritage and maintaining acceptable standards for avoiding/minimizing adverse impacts during the implementation of the project. ESMF provides clear steps, processes, procedures and responsibilities including various tools to be used during the project implementation ensuring environmental and social integration in the planning and implementation of the project supported activities. ESMF is prepared in line with the World Bank's environmental and i social Operation Policies and Government of Nepal's national laws and regulations. ESMF will be a ‘live document’, will be updated/revised, if needed during implementation, only in mutual agreement between the World Bank and the Government of Nepal. If Contingency Emergency Response Component (CERC)/Component 5 is activated, this ESMF may be updated or a specific CERC-ESMF may be prepared, as required, and disclosed. 3. Policies and Regulatory Requirements: ESMF assess the prevailing policy and legal framework of GoN and applicable World Bank’s Safeguards policies for the implementation of the project. The project triggers OP 4.01 Environment Assessment, OP 4.04 Natural Habitats, OP 4.36 Forestry, OP 4.11 Physical Cultural Resources, OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement, OP 4.10 Indigenous Peoples, and OP 4.20 Gender and Development. Gaps are identified between the relevant Nepalese laws and regulations, and the World Bank safeguard policies by comparing them; and recommendations are made to address the gaps in the context of the STENPA Project. 4. Potential Environmental and Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures: The project will not finance activities with potential significant adverse environmental or/ and social risks and/or impacts that are diverse, irreversible, or unprecedented (Annex 1 (a): Exclusion List of Project Activities). Nonetheless, moderate social and environmental impacts are likely from the physical infrastructure activities. Environmental and social impacts/ issues and risks may also arise from or linked to policy and plan that may be prepared through Technical Assistance (TA) under the project. The project is, hence, classified as “B Category” with possibility of limited/moderate adverse environmental and/or social impacts that are few in number, generally site-specific, largely reversible, and readily addressed through mitigation measures. The project, inter alia, finances environmental management and conservation activities including wildlife conservation, wildlife rescue center, wilderness enhancement and habitat management, sanitation and waste management, landslides/erosion protection, and watershed protection works, etc. These are expected to result in beneficial environmental impacts. In addition, the project aims to initiate and promote environment and nature-friendly practices in the physical infrastructure. The following negative environmental impacts, at moderate scale and limited to the vicinity of physical infrastructure, are expected from the investment in infrastructure. • Loss or degradation or disturbances to wildlife and wildlife habitats; • Loss of and/ or degradation of forest, trees, vegetation; • Over and/or illegal harvesting of wild plants, herbs, NTFPs, and fishes, birds, wildlife; • Increased human-wildlife conflict; • Loss of topsoil from land clearing, soil erosion, landslides and stream sedimentation; • Dust pollution, noise and other harmful emissions; • Pollution due to solid waste; wastewater and effluents; • Loss or degradation of good/fertile agricultural land; • Damage to other/existing infrastructures; • Degradation of aesthetic value and scenic value; ii • Land use change due to expansion of hotels and new settlements; • Degradation of physical cultural resources; and • Health and safety risks to workers, community and visitors. Similarly, possible adverse social impacts due to project intervention include: • Loss of land, shelter and land-based assets/infrastructures and livelihoods sources; • Damage/ disruption of community resources /local facilities; • Discrimination in works and wage payment; • Exclusion of indigenous peoples and vulnerable groups in decision making and planning; • Pressure on local resources (drinking water, forest products like fuel wood/ timber, etc.); • Local inflation of prices; • Obstruction and noise pollution to tourists/ trekkers during construction/ maintenance; • Loss of standing crops/orchards/trees; • Conflicts associated with construction work forces or conflict between locals and outsiders; • Increased social issues/problems; • Child labor, child safety and other labor issues; • Gender Based Violence (GBVs); • Issues related to chance finds or issues encountered during works on physical cultural resources; and • Increased burden on and competition for public service provision. This ESMF, which is developed in line of GoN and World Bank’s legal and policy framework, provides full guidance to address potential social and environmental issue/ risks/ impacts (to avoid, minimize, mitigate, and compensate adverse impacts; and enhance positive/ beneficial impacts). • All the policies and plans prepared under the project will be subjected to environmental and social overview analysis for mainstreaming environmental consideration. Such an overview analysis would be based on an issue scoping exercise involving stakeholder participation. • Each activities/proposal for strengthening capacity and institutions will be subjected to social and environmental review, and environmental and social best practices will be incorporated in the training plans and curriculums, E & S aspects will be mainstreamed/ strengthened in the proposal and/ or plan will be prepared, if needed. • Each Investment in physical infrastructure subproject/ activity will be subjected to standard E & S process and procedures including screening, environmental assessment (EA), social assessment (SA), preparation of environmental and social management plans (ESMP), RAP, etc. and monitoring during implementation. 5. Resettlement Policy Framework: The Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) is developed as part of ESMF as a guiding tool to avoid, minimize and mitigate adverse impacts caused by involuntary resettlement. This policy covers direct economic and social impacts that both result from the Bank-assisted investment projects and are caused by the iii involuntary taking
Recommended publications
  • Buffer Zone Management System in Protected Areas of Nepal
    34/ The Third Pole BUFFER ZONE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN PROTECTED AREAS OF NEPAL Narayan Prasad Bhusal Associate Professor Department of Geography Education Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur Abstract Maintenance of eco-system diversity is often carried out by establishing national parks, wildlife reserves and other protected areas. The fourth amendment of the National Park and Wildlife Conservation Act in 1992 made the provision of buffer zone for protected areas considering buffer zone, an area of 2km in the vicinity of the park could benefi t from park revenue (30-50 percent) and in return the community is supposed to participate and assist in park management activities. Between 1996 and 2010 Government of Nepal demarcated buffer zones of 12 protected areas covering a total area of 5602.67 square kilometer in 83 VDCs and two Municipalities of 27 districts where benefi ting human popula- tion is over 0.9 million. In the buffer zone management programme emphasis has been given on the natural resource management where need of eco-friendly land use practices and peoples participation in conservation for long term sustainability are encouraged. This paper is an attempt to outline the various activities that have been executed under buffer zone management programme of Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation with the internal resources, local communities and support from UNDP, WWF Nepal, CARE Nepal, NTNC and other various partners for the conservation and development of buffer zones in Nepal. Key words: Bio-diversity, park, conservation, sustainability, buffer zone, community forest, livelihood, wildlife, ecotourism. Introduction unexpectedly become useful and important the next (Upreti, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Growing Stock, Carbon Stock and Biodiversity in and Around Banke National Park, Nepal
    International Journal of Advanced Research in Botany (IJARB) Volume 5, Issue 4, 2019, PP 1-9 ISSN No. (Online) 2455-4316 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2455-4316.0504001 www.arcjournals.org Comparison Growing Stock, Carbon Stock and Biodiversity in and Around Banke National Park, Nepal Ganesh Bahadur Khadka1, Ram Asheshwar Mandal2*, Ajay Bhakta Mathema3 1Department of Forests and Soil Conservation 2,3School of Environmental Science and Management(SchEMS), Kathmandu, Nepal *Corresponding Author: Ram Asheshwar Mandal, School of Environmental Science and Management(SchEMS), Kathmandu, Nepal Abstract: Forests offer life and love to the living beings therefore, they perform enormous functions like ecosystem services, biodiversity and carbon stock but such researches are limited in Nepal. Therefore, this st udy was objectively carried out to compare the growing stock, carbon stock and biodiversity in and around Banke National Park (BaNP). The map of the study was prepared it was divided into six blocks were delineated specifically. Altogether 90 sample plots, particularly, 15 plots in each block were laid in the field. Circular nested plots having 8.92, 5.64, 1 and 0.56 m radius were established in the field to measure tree, poles, sapling and seedlings respectively. The soil samples were collected from 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depth. The diameter (at 1.3 m) and height of trees/poles/sapling were measured. The biomass was estimated using equation of Chave et al, and soil carbon was analyzed using Walkley and Black method. It was found that 104 trees/ha, 416poles/ha and 1991saplings/ha in BaNP.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • A REVIEW of the STATUS and THREATS to WETLANDS in NEPAL Re! on the Occasion Of3 I UCN World Conservation Congress, 2004
    A REVIEW OF THE STATUS AND THREATS TO WETLANDS IN NEPAL re! On the occasion of3 I UCN World Conservation Congress, 2004 A REVIEW OF THE STATUS AND THREATS TO WETLANDS IN NEPAL IUCN Nepal 2004 IUCN The World Conservation Union IUCN The World Conservation Union The support of UNDP-GEF to IUCN Nepal for the studies and design of the national project on Wetland Conservation and Sustainable Use and the publication of this document is gratefully acknowledged. Copyright: © 2004 IUCN Nepal Published June 2004 by IUCN Nepal Country Office Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: IUCN Nepal (2004). A Review o(the Status andThreats to Wetlands in Nepal 78+v pp. ISBN: 99933-760-9-4 Editing: Sameer Karki and Samuel Thomas Cover photo: Sanchit Lamichhane Design & Layout: WordScape, Kathmandu Printed by: Jagadamba Press, Hattiban, Lalitpur Available from: IUCN Nepal, P.O. Box 3923, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: (977-1) 5528781,5528761,5526391, Fax:(977-I) 5536786 email: [email protected], URL: http://www.iucnnepal.org Foreword This document is the result of a significant project development effort undertaken by the IUCN Nepal Country Office over the last two years, which was to design a national project for conservation and sustainable use of wetlands in the country.This design phase was enabled by a UNDP-GEF PDF grant.
    [Show full text]
  • GALA) – the University of Greenwich Open Access Repository
    Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (GALA) – the University of Greenwich open access repository http://gala.gre.ac.uk __________________________________________________________________________________________ Citation: Budhathoki, Prabhu (2012) Developing conservation governance strategies: holistic management of protected areas in Nepal. PhD thesis, University of Greenwich. __________________________________________________________________________________________ Please note that the full text version provided on GALA is the final published version awarded by the university. “I certify that this work has not been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not concurrently being submitted for any degree other than that of (name of research degree) being studied at the University of Greenwich. I also declare that this work is the result of my own investigations except where otherwise identified by references and that I have not plagiarised the work of others”. Budhathoki, Prabhu (2012) Developing conservation governance strategies: holistic management of protected areas in Nepal. ##thesis _type## , ##institution## Available at: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/9453/ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Contact: [email protected] DEVELOPING CONSERVATION GOVERNANCE STRATEGIES: HOLISTIC MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS IN NEPAL PRABHU BUDHATHOKI A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Greenwich for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. April 2012 DECLARATION I certify that this work has not been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not concurrently being submitted for any degree other than that of Doctor of Philosophy being studied at the University of Greenwich. I also declare that this work is the result of my own investigations except where otherwise identified by references and that I have not plagiarized the work of others. Candidate: Prabhu Budhathoki …………………………………… Supervisor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL National Red List of Nepal's Birds Volume 5
    The Status of Nepal's Birds: The National Red List Series Volume 5 Published by: The Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK Copyright: ©Zoological Society of London and Contributors 2016. All Rights reserved. The use and reproduction of any part of this publication is welcomed for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-900881-75-6 Citation: Inskipp C., Baral H. S., Phuyal S., Bhatt T. R., Khatiwada M., Inskipp, T, Khatiwada A., Gurung S., Singh P. B., Murray L., Poudyal L. and Amin R. (2016) The status of Nepal's Birds: The national red list series. Zoological Society of London, UK. Keywords: Nepal, biodiversity, threatened species, conservation, birds, Red List. Front Cover Back Cover Otus bakkamoena Aceros nipalensis A pair of Collared Scops Owls; owls are A pair of Rufous-necked Hornbills; species highly threatened especially by persecution Hodgson first described for science Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson and sadly now extinct in Nepal. Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of any participating organizations. Notes on front and back cover design: The watercolours reproduced on the covers and within this book are taken from the notebooks of Brian Houghton Hodgson (1800-1894).
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 25 November 2011 – 25 August 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-11-00003) Submitted to: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal First approved on April 18, 2013 Updated and approved on January 5, 2015 Updated and approved on July 31, 2015 Updated and approved on August 31, 2015 Updated and approved on January 19, 2016 January 19, 2016 Ms. Judy Oglethorpe Chief of Party, Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal Baluwatar, Kathmandu Subject: Approval for revised M&E Plan for the Hariyo Ban Program Reference: Cooperative Agreement # 367-A-11-00003 Dear Judy, This letter is in response to the updated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (M&E Plan) for the Hariyo Program that you submitted to me on January 14, 2016. I would like to thank WWF and all consortium partners (CARE, NTNC, and FECOFUN) for submitting the updated M&E Plan. The revised M&E Plan is consistent with the approved Annual Work Plan and the Program Description of the Cooperative Agreement (CA). This updated M&E has added/revised/updated targets to systematically align additional earthquake recovery funding added into the award through 8th modification of Hariyo Ban award to WWF to address very unexpected and burning issues, primarily in four Hariyo Ban program districts (Gorkha, Dhading, Rasuwa and Nuwakot) and partly in other districts, due to recent earthquake and associated climatic/environmental challenges. This updated M&E Plan, including its added/revised/updated indicators and targets, will have very good programmatic meaning for the program’s overall performance monitoring process in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal's Zero Poaching Standard
    NEPAL’S ZERO POACHING STANDARD © WWF 2018 All rights reserved. Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit WWF. Published by: WWF Nepal PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected], www.wwfnepal.org SETTING THE STANDARD Nepal is home to many of the world’s rarest and most beautiful Nepal made headway in the fight against poaching species. The snow leopard prowls the mountains to the north, and illegal wildlife trade with the achievement of 365 while the plains of the south are home to the Bengal tiger and days of zero poaching of rhinos for the first time in the Greater one-horned rhinoceros. 2011. Till 2018, Nepal was successful in celebrating zero poaching year of rhinos on five occasions. At the Poaching is the most urgent threat to these iconic species. heart of this conservation milestone is the country’s The international demand for their skin, bone or horn fuels successful implementation of the Zero Poaching the illegal wildlife trade, endangering their very survival. Toolkit spearheaded by WWF to help national and In fact, illegal wildlife trade is one of the five largest global state agencies, protected area managers, rangers and organized crimes; Nepal is a country of origin for many wildlife other frontline protection staff close gaps in parts, and its location makes it a major transit point for illegal anti-poaching efforts. wildlife trade. In order to address this critical conservation challenge, WWF Nepal established its Wildlife Trade Monitoring Program in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation and Potential Habitat of the Himalayan Musk Deer, Moschus Chrysogaster, in the Protected Areas of Nepal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE ISSN: 2067-533X Volume 2, Issue 2, April-June: 127-141 www.ijcs.uaic.ro THE CONSERVATION AND POTENTIAL HABITAT OF THE HIMALAYAN MUSK DEER, MOSCHUS CHRYSOGASTER, IN THE PROTECTED AREAS OF NEPAL Achyut ARYAL 1*, Ashok SUBEDI 2 1) Ecology and Conservation Group, Institute of Natural Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand 2) Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal Abstract The Himalayan musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster) is a cervid distributed from the eastern to the western Himalayas of Nepal. The species is listed as endangered in appendix I of IUCN Red data, and protected in Nepal under the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act of 1973. Musk deer occupy the middle to the higher mountain regions, which cover 12 protected areas of Nepal (6 national parks, 5 conservation areas, 1 hunting reserve). However, of the 30177.19 km2 potential habitat, only 19.26% (5815.08 km2) is inside the protected areas and the remaining 80.73% falls outside the protected areas. Consequently, poaching, habitat destruction, livestock grazing and forest fire in the musk deer habitat are important challenges for the conservation of musk deer in the country. A thorough status survey in and outside the protected areas should be carried out and a species-focused conservation action plan should be prepared and implemented properly. A program for increasing awareness and enhancing livelihood of the local populations should be launched in the poor and poaching risk zones of Nepal. Keywords: Musk deer; potential habitat; poaching; protected area. Introduction The Himalayan musk deer (Moschus Chrysogaster) (Nepali name: Kasturi Mriga) is a cervid distributed from the eastern to the western Himalayas of Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan: 2014-2020
    NEPAL NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN: 2014-2020 Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Published by Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal Website: www.mfsc.gov.np Citation GoN/MoFSC, 2014. Nepal Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2014-2020. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal. Cover page photographs Mountain Landscape, Snow Leopard, Rhino © DNPWC, Rangeland in Jumla © Niroj Shrestha, Agri-crops, Fishing in Wetland © Amit Poudyal, Yarchagumba, © Hem Raj Acharya Printed at: Sigma General Offset Press Sanepa, Lalitpur, Nepal NEPAL NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN 2014-2020 Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation NEPAL NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN 2014 - 2020 Government of Nepal THE PRIME MINISTER KATHMANDU MESSAGE NEPAL Government of Nepal is committed to the conservation and sustainable utilization of biodiversity for the prosperity of its people and the nation. As Nepal is endowed with rich biological diversity, it has tremendous potential in reshaping people’s livelihood and economic base of the country. Its conservation and management through relevant strategy is indispensable. The National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) designed for the period 2014-2020 is aimed to provide a strategic framework for the conservation of Nepal’s biodiversity. The NBSAP envisions conserving biodiversity for sound and resilient ecosystems and national prosperity. This document has been revised from the earlier Nepal Biodiversity Strategy (2002) and Implementation Plan (2006-2010) after rigorous and extensive consultations engaging a wide range of stakeholders from national to community level. The NBSAP embraces the commitment to fulfill the international obligation as signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of Nepalese Youth on Ecotourism Practiced at Rara
    Journal of Tourism & Adventure (2019) 2:1, 17-39 Journal of Tourism & Adventure Perspectives of Nepalese Youth on Ecotourism Practiced at Rara National Park, Western Nepal Chandramani Aryal Department of Environmental Science, Tri-Chandra Multiple Campus, Kathmandu [email protected] Narayan Niroula Department of Environmental Science, Saptagandaki Multiple Campus, Chitwan Bina Ghimire Centeral Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University Article Abstract Received 4 August 2019 Revised 20 August 2019 Participatory conservation approach practiced in most Accepted 4 September 2019 of the protected areas of Nepal mandate the active role of people for conservation planning and implementation. Peoples’ participation in conservation is largely regulated by the benefi ts they receive. Ecotourism, as it envisions the improved living standard of local people, could be one of the drivers for alluring local people towards biodiversity Keywords conservation. Th us, it is essential to assess ecotourism Alternative tourism, potential of a site for planning and implementing conservation, community engagement for biodiversity conservation. Karnali, livelihood, Th e potentiality of ecotourism depends upon three major Rara lake, factors i.e. visitors’ satisfaction, willingness of local people to sustainable tourism participate in ecotourism related activities, and enthusiasm of park authority. Studies on ecotourism potential in Nepal are limited in scope and time. Th erefore, this study tends to recognize the perspective of youth towards ecotourism in Rara National Park, where visitors’ numbers are growing of late. Scheduled interview was used to collect the perspectives Corresponding Editor of youth. Data were explored using descriptive statistics and Ramesh Raj Kunwar association between the perceptions and visitors’ general [email protected] background were explored using Chi-Square test.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Paper Status of Tiger and Its Conservation Efforts in Nepal
    International Journal of Global Science Research ISSN: 2348-8344 (Online) Vol. 7, Issue 1, April 2020, pp. 1277-1283 DOI: 10.26540/ijgsr.v7.i1.2020.149 Available Online at www.ijgsr.com © Copyright 2014 | ijgsr.com | All Rights Reserved Review Paper Status of tiger and its conservation efforts in Nepal: A review Nabina Dhakal1*, Sami Shrestha2 and Jiban Shrestha3 1Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal 2Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Hariyokharka, Pokhara-15, Nepal 3Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Agriculture Botany Division, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal *Corresponding author email: [email protected] Received: 01/03/2020 Revised: 14/03/2020 Accepted: 30/03/2020 Abstract: Tiger (Panthera tigris) is one of INTRODUCTION the most endangered wildlife species in Tiger (Panthera tigris) is considered as Nepal. Currently there are 235 tigers symbol of strength, mysterious and noble counted in Nepal. The areas of habitat of beings. It is the largest cat (feline) species tigers have been extended from 4502.5 km2 with pattern of dark vertical stripes on (before 2010) to 6167.12 km2 (after 2018). reddish-orange fur with a lighter underside Five national parks (Chitwan, Bardia, along with muscular body, powerful Banke, Shuklaphata and Parsa National forelimbs, large head and a tail that is about Parks), four protection forest (Brandabhar, half the length of the body. They are Khata, Baanta and Laljhadi Protection generally different in size with Forest) and one conservation area distinguishable sexual dimorphism (Krishnasaar Conservation Area) are between males and females, with females preserving tigers in Nepal. Tigers have being smaller than males. A 2016 survey been facing extinction due to poaching, loss found out 3,890 wild tigers and 5,000 of habitat from urbanization and specimens in the United States (WWF, deforestation, and depletion of prey 2018).
    [Show full text]