DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Women Matter Summit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Women Matter Summit WWhhyy WWoommeenn MMaatttteerr LESSONS ABOUT WOMEN’S POLITICAL LEADERSHIP FROM HOME & ABROAD Summit Materials National Press Club, Washington, DC March 3, 2003 Crowne Plaza, San Francisco, CA March 6, 2003 WHY WOMEN MATTER SUMMIT THE WHITE HOUSE PROJECT 110 Wall Street, 2nd floor New York, NY 10005 (212) 785-6001 - 1 - Find further information about The White House Project and our other research and programs online at: www.thewhitehouseproject.org The White House Project would like to thank the following for their contributions to this Briefing Book: Ann Burroughs Georgia Duerst-Lahti, Beloit College Morgan Hanger & Erin Vilardi, WHP Interns Anat Maytal, former WHP Intern Karen O’Connor, Women & Politics Institute at American University Rob Richie and Steven Hill, Center for Voting & Democracy The Proteus Fund Women’s E-News Briefing Book for “Why Women Matter” Summit © 2003 by The White House Project Edited by Shauna L. Shames Research Director, The White House Project WHY WOMEN MATTER SUMMIT THE WHITE HOUSE PROJECT 110 Wall Street, 2nd floor New York, NY 10005 (212) 785-6001 - 2 - Table of Contents Introduction 3 The White House Project Overview 5 PART I: SUMMIT MATERIALS Why Women Matter Summit Schedules 6 Why Women Matter Speaker Biographies 9 Summit Partner Organizations 15 Summit Postscript 18 PART II: U.S. RESEARCH Women in Politics: National Statistics 20 Research Overview: Do Women in Local, State, and National Legislative Bodies Matter? 21 A Definitive Yes Proves Three Decades of Research by Political Scientists PART III: INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES & STRATEGIES Women in Politics: International Overview 26 Women in Politics: Country Rankings 28 Strategies for Equality: Initiatives from a Selection of Countries 33 PART IV: U.S. INITIATIVES & STRATEGIES Introduction: U.S. Initiatives & Strategies 39 Overview: A Selection of Possible Strategies to Increase Women’s Political Representation 41 Detailed Descriptions of Select Strategies: A. Recruitment & Training Programs: Overview 42 Local & Community Projects to Increase Women’s Political 43 Participation in Individual States B. What is Proportional Representation? 52 C. What is Instant Runoff Voting? 54 Related Article: American Women Have a Long Way To Go 55 D. Public Funding of Campaigns & Clean Money Initiatives 57 E. How Can CEDAW Be Used to Increase Women’s Political Power? Two Local Initiatives 58 Conclusion: More Women in Political Leadership - Strategies for the Coming Decade 62 WHY WOMEN MATTER SUMMIT THE WHITE HOUSE PROJECT 110 Wall Street, 2nd floor New York, NY 10005 (212) 785-6001 - 3 - Board Of Directors Deborah Carstens (AZ) Kathryn Kolbert (PA) E ntrepreneur, WISH National Board Executive Producer, Justice Talking B arbara Dobkin (NY) Deborah Slaner Larkin (NY) F ounder & Chair, Ma'yan Activist Wi ni Freund (NY) Colleen May (CA) Owner, Intervine Inc. L ong Island Community Foundation Mary McCormick (NY) Margaret Greenawalt (PA) Activist President, Fund for the City of New York Donna Frisby Greenwood (PA) Wendy Puriefoy (DC) E xecutive Director, Inner City Games President, Public Education Network Kath leen Hall Jamieson (PA) The Rev. Dr. Katherine Ragsdale (MA) D ean, Annenberg School for Communication Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice B oard Emeritus Davia Temin (NY) President, Temin & Company White House Project Staff White House Project Interns 2002-2003 Marie C. Wilson, President Alanna Chan B everly Neufeld, Executive Director Sevan Basil Helen French, Executive Assistant Lorett Cisse Mary Semela, Development Director Morgan Hanger Shauna Shames, Research Director Kate Henningsen Sonal Nalkur, Public Education Director Anat Maytal Tanya Rodriguez, Finance Associate Marlysha Myrthil B obbie Watkins, Fundraising Associate Julie Nimnicht Eliz abeth Chatalas, Programs Janice Oh Sarah Phillips Alyssa Saunders Erin Vilardi White House Project Consultants 2002-2003 A merican Viewpoint, Linda DiVall and Bob Lake Snell Perry & Associates, Celinda Lake Carpenter Laguens, Hamburger, Stone, Dawn Laguens Bronznick & Jacoby, Shifra Bronznick and Martin Hamburger Melissa Silverstein Public Interest Media Group, The Cosgrove Group, Tom Cosgrove Susan Lamontagne & Andrea Miller Communications for Development and PSG Consulting, Page Gardner Social Change, Ann Burroughs The Strategic Issues Management Group The Farwell Group, James P. Farwell WHY WOMEN MATTER SUMMIT THE WHITE HOUSE PROJECT 110 Wall Street, 2nd floor New York, NY 10005 (212) 785-6001 - 4 - Introduction By Marie C. Wilson President, The White House Project Despite its historical role of leadership in the women’s movement, the United States ranks 58th among nations in its representation of women at the national level. We believe that the time has come to change the face of America’s political leadership. To this end, The White House Project has launched a new initiative, Why Women Matter: Lessons About Women’s Political Leadership from Home and Abroad. Our primary goal is to inspire a national movement to increase the number of women in politics in this country. Our summits in Washington D.C. and San Francisco brought together international and domestic leaders, political experts and representatives from women’s organizations. We looked at successful ideas and initiatives that have been used in other countries and at home to increase women’s representation. These summits presented a unique opportunity for our nation’s leaders and aspiring women leaders to collaborate with women who have successfully created change and opened the doors to political leadership for women in their own countries. In some cases, this has been accomplished through political mandates for inclusion, and in others, a groundswell of support for women candidates at the grassroots level. In all cases, there were valuable lessons for us to learn. Consensus is building globally that women play pivotal roles as agents of change in their communities and societies. Increasingly, women collaborate within and across their borders to reach their full political and economic potential, irrespective of cultural differences. During the last ten years, many nations have recognized the power of women as a force for social change and have embraced mandates to include substantial numbers of women in government. There is no doubt that democracy in the United States would be strengthened if it were to be more reflective of the demographics of this country and more representative of the majority. At present women comprise 52 percent of the nation’s population, yet they are vastly under- represented in government. Only 14 positions in the 100 member Senate are held by women, and only 59 women serve in the 435 House of Representatives. Nationally, only 20 percent of all elected officials are women. Of the 50 state governors, six are women, and in our nation’s history, only 23 women have served as governors. This is particularly significant since many men have launched successful bids for the presidency from the governor’s office. At the local level, representation of women has dropped dramatically. It is this pipeline that provides the most critical conduit for state and national representation. If we are to fuel this pipeline, we will need all the help we can get to reframe, reinvigorate and support local strategies to foster the entry of women into positions of leadership. If we are successful, we will inevitably change the face of government in the United States. WHY WOMEN MATTER SUMMIT THE WHITE HOUSE PROJECT 110 Wall Street, 2nd floor New York, NY 10005 (212) 785-6001 - 5 - Why Women Matter gathered together some of the best minds to think creatively about which strategies and initiatives, from home and abroad, will be most effective in advancing women’s representation in this country. Our summits in Washington D.C. and San Francisco were set within a framework of key questions: Why is it important that women enter government and what happens when a significant number of women govern? What strategies were used by women in other countries to push for and maintain this critical mass? How can we do the same in the United States? Without losing sight of our long-term goal of changing the face of government in this country, Why Women Matter provided all of us with the opportunity to achieve several key objectives. We strengthened and expanded collaboration among sister organizations. We began the creation of a network amongst ourselves, comprised of advocates for more representative democracy in our country and a corps of natural allies and supporters for women candidates. We believe that a drumbeat of support across the country will shift broad public perceptions about the capacity of women to lead. It is our hope that this drumbeat will motivate more women to become involved in politics and inspire more party activists and grassroots organizers to support them. There is no dearth of women and men who have both the passion and the capacity to pursue a vision for truly representative government. The Why Women Matter summits offered a rare opportunity to gather this energy and expertise together, and to document and share the rich diversity of experience that has resulted in the inclusion of women in government the world over. The White House Project has worked with several partners to create the Why Women Matter summits. The depth of the collective wisdom and expertise that our partners have so generously put at our disposal has been extraordinary. They have functioned in a way that we can best describe as the beginnings of a brain trust
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Document Received by the CA 2Nd District Court of Appeal
    No. B295935 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT ______________________________________________________ CITY OF SANTA MONICA, Appellant-Defendant, v. PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION; MARIA LOYA, Respondents and Plaintiffs. ____________________________________________________________ BRIEF FOR FAIRVOTE AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS AND AFFIRMANCE ___________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles The Hon. Yvette M. Palazuelos, Judge Presiding Superior Court Case No. BC616804 ____________________________________________________________ *IRA M. FEINBERG PATRICK C. HYNDS (Bar No. 64066) (pro hac vice pending) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP JOSEPH M. CHARLET 390 Madison Avenue (pro hac vice pending) New York, NY 10017 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP Telephone: (212) 918-3000 555 Thirteenth Street NW Fax: (212) 918-3100 Washington, DC 20004 [email protected] Telephone: (202) 637-5600 Fax: (202) 637-5910 ZACH MARTINEZ (pro hac vice pending) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 1601 Wewatta Street, Suite 900 Denver, CO 80202 February 4, 2020 Telephone: (303) 899-7300 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Document receivedbytheCA2ndDistrictCourtofAppeal. Fax: (303) 899-7333 FairVote CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITES OR PERSONS FairVote is a non-profit organization headquartered in Takoma Park, Maryland that advocates for fairer political representation through election reform. Since its founding in 1992, FairVote has been committed to advancing ranked-choice voting, also known as a single-transferable-vote (“STV”) method, in both single-member-district and at-large voting systems. It does so by conducting original research and advocating for electoral reforms at the local, state, and national levels. FairVote believes that implementing alternative at-large remedies, including ranked-choice and cumulative voting, will allow voters to elect representatives who better reflect their communities’ and society’s diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Representation Voting – Lessons from Cumulative Voting in Illinois by Rob Richiei Prepared for National Democracy Slam, April 22, 2015
    Fair representation voting – Lessons from cumulative voting in Illinois By Rob Richiei Prepared for National Democracy Slam, April 22, 2015 We have more than 7,000 state legislators in the United States today. The great majority of them are elected in single-winner districts, where each legislator represents a group of people that no one else represents in that legislative chamber. But that’s not true in Maryland, where I and most other Maryland voters have three representatives in the House of Delegates, and it didn’t always used to be that way nationally. As recently as the 1950’s, more than half of state representatives shared constituents with other representatives in multi-winner districts, at a time when voters in several states had more than one U.S. House Member as well. One of those states with multi-winner state legislative districts was Illinois. Every voter had three representatives in the Illinois House of Representatives. But unlike other multi-winner state legislative districts elsewhere Illinois did not have a winner-take-all rule. That is, 51% of voters were not able to control 100% of representation in the way that they can today in my three-seat district in Maryland. Instead, if more than a quarter of like-minded voters wanted a certain kind of representation, they had the voting power to win one of the three seats. A 51% majority would have the power to elect two of three seats, but not all three of them. This “fair representation voting rule” was based on providing voters with cumulative voting rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios
    2016 Post-Election Briefing: Politics, Policy and Philanthropy November 16-17, 2016 Penn Quarter A & B, Grand Hyatt, 1000 H St NW, Washington, DC SPEAKER BIOS Sandra McAlister Ambrozy, Senior Program Officer, Human Services, The Kresge Foundation Sandra McAlister Ambrozy is a senior program officer with The Kresge Foundation’s Human Services Program. She joined Kresge in 1982 and has served in many roles during her time at the foundation. With more than 30 years of experience in philanthropy, Sandra has developed expertise in human services, arts and culture, green building initiatives and civil legal aid. She helps shape and refine grantmaking for the Human Services Program so Kresge’s philanthropic dollars are used effectively to advance innovative, multi-sectoral policy solutions in human services and foster the next generation of human services organizations. In particular, she helps nonprofit leaders structure their organizations, adapt to evolving forces in the field and access resources. Sandra was named as a 2016 Presidio Institute Fellow and is participating in the fellowship program to build cross-sector leadership skills to address complex social challenges. She also serves on the Steering Committee providing guidance and oversight to the Grantmakers Income Security Taskforce (GIST). Her work has been recognized with six Wilmer Shields Rich Awards from the Council on Foundations for creating transparency and accessibility in Kresge’s communications. Sandra also coordinated the Partnership to Raise Community Capital, a national initiative for community foundations. From 2008 to 2016, she served on the board of the Funders Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities. A U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan's Parliament in the Making
    The involvement of women in Afghanistan’s public life is decreasing. Attacks, vigilantism, and legal processes that contradict the basic principles of human and women’s rights are the order of the day. The security situation is worsening in step with the disenchantment E MAKING H arising from the lack of results and functional shortcomings of existing democratic structures. In the face of such difficulties, we often forget who should create the legal underpinnings for the power in Afghanistan: the women and men in parliament who are working to build a state in these turbulent times of transition. To what extent will these elected representatives succeed in creating alternatives to established traditional power structures? What are the obstacles they face? What kinds of networks or caucuses are they establishing? This book, which is based on interviews of male and female members of parliament held in Kabul in 2007 and 2008, examines the reali- IN T pARLIAMENT ANISTan’s H ties of parliamentary work in Afghanistan. It shows how varied and G coercive the patterns of identification prevalent in Afghanistan can AF be, and it provides a rare opportunity to gain insights into the self- images and roles of women in parliament. ISBN 978-3-86928-006-6 Andrea Fleschenberg Afghanistan’s parliament in the making Andrea Fleschenberg Gendered understandings and practices of politics in a transitional country .) ED BÖLL FOUNDATION ( BÖLL FOUNDATION H The Green Political Foundation Schumannstraße 8 10117 Berlin www.boell.de HEINRIC Afghanistan’s parliament in the making Andrea Fleschenberg, PhD, currently works as research associate and lecturer at the Institute of Social Science at the University of Hildesheim, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraqi-Afghan Women's Roundtable and Press Event
    MEMO TO: DP FR: ANDREA, SHILOH RE: Iraqi-Afghan Women’s Roundtable and Press Event th What: Closed Member Meeting from 2:45 – 3:30 pm, Wednesday, March 9P th Open Press Conference from 3:30 – 3:45 pm, Wednesday, March 9P The purpose of the roundtable is to highlight continued working relationship between US and Iraqi and Afghani Women leaders. Women’s Caucus will continue their efforts to mentor future leaders in the two countries and share their experiences and views of democratic government with the leaders. Attendees: Members confirmed: Judy Biggert Ginny Brown-Waite Shelley Moore Capito JoAnn Emerson Kay Granger Katherine Harris Nancy Johnson Deborah Pryce Hilda Solis **Under Secretary of State Dobriansky will be facilitating the discussion Afghan delegation: 0TDr. Massouda Jalal, Minister of Women’s Affairs (Head of Delegation) 0TUNOTE: she is the woman that will be shadowing you. Suraya Amir Mohammad Paikan, Deputy Minister of Higher Education (Dec 2004) Dr. Nadera Hayt Burhani, Deputy Minister for Reproductive Health, Deputy Minister for Mother and Child Health, Ministry of Public Health Iraqi Delegation: Narmin Othman, State Minister for Women’s Affairs. (Head of delegation). U*NOTE: You met her on your trip to Iraq at Al Raashid Hotel in Baghdad Wijdan Michael Salim is a member of Baghdad Provincial Council and an advisor to Prime Minister Allawi on foreign affairs. She was elected to the National Assembly in the recent Iraqi election. (no photos, no media) Ansam Abayachi heads the Ministry of Planning’s civil society, non-governmental sector. (no photos, no media) Shatha Abdul Razak is a member of the Women’s Educational Society and of the Iraqi Islamic Party.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT Cesar Perales, Chair Rachel Godsil, Vice Chair Carlo Scissura, Secretary Matt Gewolb, Executive Director
    CHARTER 2018 NYC REVISION COMMISSION 2018 PRELIMINARY STAFF REPORT Cesar Perales, Chair Rachel Godsil, Vice Chair Carlo Scissura, Secretary Matt Gewolb, Executive Director LETTER TO THE CHAIR Dear Chair Perales and Commissioners: I am delighted to present this Preliminary Staff Report, which I hope will serve as an informative and useful guide for the ongoing work of the 2018 New York City Charter Revision Commission. As you know, the Commission has been extremely active in engaging with City residents during the initial stages of this revision process. From listening to in-person public testimony to engaging experts at our four Issue Forums to our “Commissioner- in-your-Borough” events, we have engaged the public in a serious—and enlightening— conversation about governance in New York City. We have considered the entire City Charter to identify areas for potential revision. The Commission received hundreds of comments from New Yorkers from across the five boroughs. Advocacy and good government groups, elected officials, academics, and others have made meaningful contributions, and we will continue to consult with stakeholders as this process unfolds. The New York City Law Department, and others within City government, have provided invaluable guidance. We tremendously appreciate their efforts, as well as those of all of the other organizations and individuals who have provided assistance. Ultimately, this Preliminary Staff Report reflects a focus on civic life and democracy in New York City—a theme that is particularly appropriate and relevant in contemporary times. The report also introduces a new and exciting phase in our process—one that I am confident will include a robust public discussion and debate about the future of the City Charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Anxiety and the American Dream Is the Dream at Risk in the 21St Century?
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ECONOMIC ANXIETY AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS THE DREAM AT RISK IN THE 21ST CENTURY? PRESENTER: CELINDA LAKE, PRESIDENT, LAKE RESEARCH PARTNERS MODERATOR: E.J. DIONNE JR., SENIOR FELLOW, THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION PANELISTS: WILLIAM GALSTON, SENIOR FELLOW, THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION GREG TARPINIAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CHANGE TO WIN ELISABETH JACOBS, RESEARCH FELLOW, THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION JIM KESSLER, VICE PRESIDENT FOR POLICY, THIRD WAY FRIDAY, JULY 13, 2007 10:00 A.M. – 12:00 P.M. THE CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE WASHINGTON, D.C. Transcript by: Federal News Service Washington, D.C. E.J. DIONNE: I want to welcome everyone here today. It’s a sign of our careful planning that we decided that the perfect day for a discussion of economic anxiety was Friday the 13th – (laughter) – and so it’s very good to have you all here. I think besides this group itself is how important the issues of economic anxiety and economic insecurity have become. But right near the beginning, I want to say two big thank yous, first to the Carnegie Endowment for letting us use this space. Over at Brookings, we are undergoing a renovation, and it’s a fine act of solidarity on Carnegie’s part to offer us this room. I want to thank Dan Conway of Carnegie for working on this. Secondly, I want to thank – I must thank Korin Davis, one of the most able and intelligent people at Brookings, for her exceptional work and perseverance in putting this event together. There are others who helped and I’m going to thank them in a second, but it is actually completely and entirely true in this case that without Korin this event would not have happened.
    [Show full text]
  • C00053 6930 Carroll Ave., Suite 610 the Center for Takoma Park, MD 20912 - (301) 270-4616 (301) 270-4133 (Fax)
    STATE OF HAWAII OFFICE OF ELECTIONS 802 LEHUA AVENUE PEARL CITY, HAWAll 96782 www.hawaii.gov/elections KEVIN B. CRONIN CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER TESTIMONY OF THE CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER, OFFICE OF ELECTIONS TO THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY ON SENATE BILL NO. 2898, S.D.I RELATING TO AGREEMENT AMONG THE STATES TO ELECT THE PRESIDENT BY NATIONAL POPULAR VOTE March 20, 2008 Chair Waters and members ofthe House Committee on Judiciary, thank you for the opportunity to testify on Senate Bill No. 2898, S.D.I. The purpose ofthis bill is to allow states to determine the winner ofa presidential election by "national popular vote". The Office ofElections knows the contents ofthis bill and believes this bill presents a policy issue for the Legislature to resolve in its sound judgment. The Office ofElections remains available to provide, on request, any technical assistance arising from this bill. Please let us know ifthis office can be ofassistance to you. Respectfully Submitted: By Kevin Cronin C00053 6930 Carroll Ave., Suite 610 The Center for Takoma Park, MD 20912 - (301) 270-4616 (301) 270-4133 (fax) . [email protected] Voting and Democracy www.fairvote.org Written Testimony of Rob Richie, Executive Director On Behalf of Hawaii's SB2898 SD 1, March 19,2008 Thank you very much for the opportunity to provide written testimony in support of SB 2898 SI, legislation to enter Hawaii into an interstate compact designed to guarantee the election of the presidential candidate who wins the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. My name is Rob Richie.
    [Show full text]
  • Intervenor Alaskans for Better Elections, Inc
    Scott M. Kendall Alaska Bar No. 0405019 J ahna M. Lindemuth Alaska Bar No. 9711068 Samuel G. Gottstein Alaska Bar No. 1511099 FILED in the Tri~! Courts Holmes Weddle & Barcott, P.C. State of Alaska Third ;.)1stnct 701 West 8th Avenue, Ste. 700 Anchorage, AK 99501 .APR U 2 202"1 Phone: 907.274.0666 Clerk of the Trial courts Fax: 907.277.4657 By______ Deputy Attorneys for Intervenor Alaskans for Better Elections, Inc. IN THE SUPERJOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE SCOTT A. KOHLHAAS, THE ALASKAN INDEPENDENCE PARTY, ROBERT M. BIRD, AND KENNETH P. JACOBUS, Plaintiffs, V. STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ALASKA: DIVISION OF ELECTIONS; Case No. 3AN-20-09532 CI LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR KEVIN MEYER, in his official capacity as Supervisor of Elections; and GAIL FENUMIAI, in her official capacity of Director of the Division of Elections Defendants. ALASKANS FOR BETTER ELECTIONS, INC. Intervenor. 61NTERVENOR ALASKANS FOR BETTER ELECTIONS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Intervenor Alaskans for Better Elections, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment Scott A. Kohlhaas, et al. v. State of Alaska, et. al., Case No. 3AN-20-09532 CI Page 1 of 39 I. INTRODUCTION After voters approved an election reform initiative in November 2020, Plaintiffs Scott A. Kohlhaas, the Alaskan Independence Party, Robert M. Bird, and Kenneth P. Jacobus ( collectively "Plaintiffs") filed this facial challenge seeking to invalidate the entirety of the popularly-enacted law. 1 Through this law, the public adopted comprehensive reforms to give voters and individual candidates more choices in elections, and to ensure that the candidates with the most support - regardless of party affiliation ( or lack thereof) - would represent Alaskans.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Four Primary Ranked Choice Voting for U.S
    Top Four Primary Ranked Choice Voting for U.S. House Elections What It Is and How It Performs on Key Democracy Criteria Prepared by Rob Richie1for the National Democracy Slam on April 22, 2015 Summary of Evaluation of Impact on Criteria Voter turnout and political participation: 3 Fair representation of parties and political groups: 2 Fair representation of racial minorities and women: 3 Electoral competition: 4 Reduction of polarization in Congress: 4 Impact Scale Definitions 1 No impact or negative impact 2 Low impact or impact likely only if coupled with other reforms 3 Moderate impact 4 High impact, including significant long-term impact 5 Problem substantially solved, even without other reform Description of Top Four Primary with Ranked Choice Voting The Top Four primary combines the best features of two electoral rules: the Top Two Primary and ranked choice voting. Congress could enact it nationally for congressional elections or individual states could adopt it for their federal and state elections. It involves three changes: Adopting ranked choice voting for both primary and general elections: Ranked choice voting (RCV, known also as “instant runoff voting” and “preferential voting”) is a voting method that can address a range of defects derived from our current electoral rules when more than two candidates run for an office. Voters are given the option to rank candidates in order of preference. Their vote is counted initially for their first choice. If no candidate has more than half of those votes, then the last-place candidate is eliminated. The votes of those who selected the defeated candidate as a first choice are then added to the totals of their next choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbidden Faces: Effects of Taliban Rule
    Forbidden Faces: Effects of Taliban Rule on Women in Afghanistan Overview In this lesson, students will explore the rise of Taliban power in Afghanistan and the impacts of Taliban rule upon Afghan women. Grade 9 North Carolina Essential Standards for World History • WH.8.3 ‐ Explain how liberal democracy, private enterprise and human rights movements have reshaped political, economic and social life in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Europe, the Soviet Union and the United States (e.g., U.N. Declaration of Human Rights, end of Cold War, apartheid, perestroika, glasnost, etc.). • WH.8.4‐ Explain why terrorist groups and movements have proliferated and the extent of their impact on politics and society in various countries (e.g., Basque, PLO, IRA, Tamil Tigers, Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, etc.). Essential Questions • What is the relationship between Islam and the Taliban? • How does the Taliban try to control Afghan women? • How has the experience of Afghan women changed with the Taliban’s emergence? • What was the United States’ role in the Taliban coming to power? • How is clothing used as a means of oppression in Afghanistan? Materials • Overhead or digital projector • Post Its (four per student) • Value statements written on poster or chart paper: 1. I am concerned about being attacked by terrorists. 2. America has supported the Taliban coming into power. 3. All Muslims (people practicing Islam) support the Taliban. 4. I know someone currently deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan. • Opinion scale for each value statement
    [Show full text]
  • GENDER JUSTICE at POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION: IMPLEMENTATION of WOMEN’S POLITICAL RIGHTS at ELECTION PERIODS in the CASE of POST-CONFLICT AFGHANISTAN
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Sabanci University Research Database GENDER JUSTICE AT POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION: IMPLEMENTATION OF WOMEN’s POLITICAL RIGHTS AT ELECTION PERIODS IN THE CASE OF POST-CONFLICT AFGHANISTAN by ASLI ŞAHİN Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Conflict Analysis and Resolution Sabancı University June 2006 GENDER JUSTICE AT POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OF WOMEN’S POLITICAL RIGHTS AT ELECTION PERIODS IN THE CASE OF POST-CONFLICT AFGHANISTAN APPROVED BY: Dr. İbrahim Al-Marashi ..…………………………. (Dissertation Supervisor) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayse Gül Altınay ..…………………………. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nimet Beriker ..…………………………. DATE OF APPROVAL: June 16, 2006 © Aslı Şahin 2006 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT GENDER JUSTICE AT POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OF WOMEN’S POLITICAL RIGHTS AT ELECTION PERIODS IN THE CASE OF POST-CONFLICT AFGHANISTAN Aslı Şahin. MA Thesis, 2006. Thesis Supervisor: Dr. İbrahim Al-Marashi Keywords: Post-conflict, women’s political rights, positive discrimination, elections In conflict environments, women are often denied justice. This situation is being challenged for post-conflict environments with the initiations on gender-equal approaches. The integration of human rights language, specifically women’s rights, into post-conflict reconstruction, paves the way for gender-equal environments. The commitments to gender equality and women's empowerment on a wider context of transformative possibilities have converted the post-conflict settings as “opportunity spaces” for women. Concerns for the inclusion of women in post-conflict reconstruction, backed by the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, is an important contributing cause for the integration of human rights and gender equal language into post-conflict Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]