DOCSLIB.ORG

NGO Comments on the Initial Israeli State Report on Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NGO Comments on the Initial Israeli State Report on Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child NGO Comments on the Initial Israeli State Report on Implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A Mixed Bag: Lawmaking to Promote Children’s Rights, Ongoing Discrimination, and Many Serious Violations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Prepared for the Pre-sessional Working Group UN Committee on the Rights of the Child – 31st Session by Defense for Children International – Israel Section in consultation with members of The Israeli Children's Rights Coalition April 2002 DCI-Israel and Coalition page 2 NGO Report This NGO Report was prepared by Defense for Children International – Israel in consultation with members of the Israeli Children’s Rights Coalition. However, this report represents the views of DCI – Israel alone. Members of the Israel Children’s Rights Coalition do not necessarily support all aspects of the Report. A preliminary draft report written by Hephzibah Levine was circulated among coalition members. The contributions and comments by members of the Israel Children’s Rights Coalition have been integrated into the report by Dr. Philip Veerman, who also did a systematic analysis of the implementation of all of the articles of the CRC, further research and rewriting. Radda Barnen (Swedish Save the Children) and the Haella Foundation in the Netherlands contributed financial support for the production of this report by DCI – Israel in cooperation with the NGO’s. ISBN 965-90445-0-X © All Rights Reserved by Defense for Children International-Israel, Jerusalem, 2002 Deposited at the Register of Publications in the Israel Center for Libraries, Bnai Brak. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher, the Israel section of Defense for Children International, (DCI- Israel) P.O Box 8028, Jerusalem, 92384, Israel. Telephone: (00972-2) 5633003 Fax: (00972-2) 5631241 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dci.org.il DCI-Israel and Coalition page 3 NGO Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Israeli section of Defense for Children International (DCI-Israel), in consultation with members of the Israeli Children’s Rights Coalition which includes more than 60 NGOs, herewith submits an NGO (‘alternative’) report in accordance with Article 45 of the CRC. The essential context of this report, for which DCI-Israel takes responsibility, is the period of ongoing violence in which the State of Israel is presently engaged and the consequent preference afforded to security as against other aspects of life in the country. The issue of children’s rights is particularly sensitive to the priority afforded to security needs: unfortunately, the demands of security tend to hold back progress in the fulfillment of children’s rights since resources are inevitably directed primarily toward the military effort. Without a peaceful resolution of the conflict, it is the children who will tragically be among the main victims of the situation. DCI-Israel and the Coalition believe that the Initial State Report was over-focused on legislation, with too little emphasis put on enforcement. In the area of lawmaking many positive steps as regards children’s rights are being taken in Israel (for example the progressive legislation which allows a social worker to appear before a court instead of an abused child, so that the latter does not have to face his/her attacker) However, the unfortunate reality in Israel is that the impact of progressive lawmaking is presently blunted because much of the legislation is passed but never implemented.. Moreover, much important legislation is still lacking. There is lack of constitutional social rights within Israel and in particular, the State lacks constitutional protection of its Arab minority. The Coalition welcomes the establishment of the Roth-Levy Committee, established in 1997 in order to harmonize the relevant Israeli legislation, examine the fundamental principles of relevant legislation concerning children, and the implementation of such legislation in light of the CRC. In its totality, the CRC has not yet been made into the law of the land. The minimum standards that it lays down must be implemented before a detailed Children’s Rights Law will be presented by the Roth Levy Committee. Regardless of the current security situation, many important issues have been neglected, for example therapy for sexually and physically abused children, for which quite inadequate budgets are available. The Initial State report recognizes that there exists discrimination against children of the Arab Israeli minority. The steps taken to remedy the situation have so far been far from satisfactory. More radical steps must be taken by the government if this discrimination, expressed in education, health care, social services, etc. is to be eradicated. This applies to the whole Arab sector, whose population is growing rapidly, and in particular to the ‘unrecognized’ Bedouin villages It must be noted that the Initial State Report devotes almost no attention to the situation of Palestinian children living in the occupied territories. Here there are reports by both Palestinian and Israeli human rights organizations of serious violations of the CRC. The NGO Report discusses many such violations including the lethal use by the Israeli authorities of rubber-coated bullets or live ammunition against civilian populations, DCI-Israel and Coalition page 4 NGO Report conditions of interrogation, house demolition, impeded access to health care and hospitals due to closure and roadblocks, etc. Although the Palestinian Authority is not under review, since Israel is the state which is party to the CRC the Committee should bear in mind that there are many armed Palestinian groups who deliberately and indiscriminately attack civilians, including children, within Israel proper. Terror attacks and suicide bombing are gross violations of international, humanitarian and human rights laws, creating an atmosphere of fear and insecurity among children and adults alike. In our experience, they are also likely to cause a deterioration in areas like the interrogation by the authorities of minors. The growing gap between rich and poor in Israeli society intensifies serious economic problems that directly affect children. While poverty denies children the chance to enjoy equal opportunities in life, in the year 2,000, one out of every four children in Israel were living under the poverty line. This growing problem has the gravest possible implications for these children in every aspect of life. In spite of facing the possibility of an escalating armed conflict, with the resultant tension in the everyday lives of its citizens, Israel must focus consistently on promoting both human rights and children’s rights. DCI-Israel is conscious of the obstacles to upholding the values of the CRC in the difficult conditions now pertaining in Israel. However, recent weeks have witnessed increasing examples of deterioration in the position of children as budgets relating to their welfare as cut in order to pay for the massive security needs. The NGO Report can contribute to upholding international human rights standards. Indeed it can serve as a practical guide for Israeli implementation of the CRC in spite of the exigencies of the present situation. Dr. Philip Veerman, Director of DCI-Israel and Coordinator of the Israeli Children’s Rights Coalition. Jerusalem, April, 2002. DCI-Israel and Coalition page 5 NGO Report Acknowledgements Some DCI-Israel board members (Advocate Eliyahu Abram, Chair, Professor Charles Greenbaum, Deputy Chair, Professor Ruth Butler, Mr. Hillel Bardien, and advocate Helen Motro) together with DCI-Israel advisory board member, Professor Leon Sheleff, formed the “think tank” of the NGO Report. In addition, the input of Professor Leslie Sebba of DCI -Israel’s advisory board, and Rabbi Yehiel Greneman of the organization “Rabbis for Human Rights” and Dr. Hannah Niedorf of the Jerusalem Council for Children and youth are appreciated. Advocate Jamil Dalcwar of Adalah gave very valuable comments. On March 17, the conclusions on the report were discussed by the DCI –Israel board, and on March 18 the conclusions were further discussed with MK Tamar Gozansky, Dr. Eyal Gross, Shuli Dichter of Sikkuy, and Dr. Na’ama Carmi of ACRI, advocate Stefanie Raker of Israel Women’s Network, Maja Goldman of Kesher, DCI - Israel lawyers Vivy Rechnitz, Gal Torres, and Jonathan Weingarten. DCI-Israel intern from the Rothberg School for Overseas Students of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Ella Rosenberg helped to finish the manuscript. Yael Mendlinger, intern from the Minerva Institute for Human Rights of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem wrote a draft for the introduction chapter. Several years ago Sarah Gundle wrote a first draft. Chapter VIII was rewritten by Dr. Ruth Firer, Director of Peace Education Projects of the Harry S. Truman Institute for the Advancement of Peace, of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and Board member of DCI- Israel. Advocate Einat Hurvitz of the Israel Religious Action Center rewrote several sections of the report (Article 7 and Article 14). Nihaya Daoud, MPH, RN, MED of the school of Public Health of Hadassah and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem contributed to the part on health and health services (Article 24). Curt Arnson of Hamoked (the Center for the Defense of the Individual) wrote the sections on children in East Jerusalem. Professor Rachel Zeva and Professor Arza Churchman of the Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning of the Israel Technological Institute (Technion) in Haifa wrote a background paper for us to better understand Article 31 (Play and Leisure) in the Israeli Context. Attorney at law of DCI-Israel, Vivvi Rechnitz wrote the part on psychiatric hospitalization (Article 40), attorney at law Mahmoud Rabah (lawyer for DCI -Israel in East Jerusalem) contributed to the section on torture, degrading treatment and deprivation of liberty (Article 37) of Palestinian children in East Jerusalem. We are grateful that we could use affidavits obtained by the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And Other Enemies of the People
    ‘Anti-Zionists’ and other Enemies of the People “Did you know? Jeremy Bird, the American strategist, who came to help the left oust Bibi comes from anti-Israeli circles that argue that Gaza is the only place in the world in which soldiers [IDF] kill kids for sport.”(My Israel: Doing Zionism) A couple of weeks ago, Labor MK Stav Shaffir’s impromptu Knesset speech went viral. Social media called it “Who is a Zionist?” Shaffir attacked Habayt Hayehudi’s MKs for pretending they are “more Zionist than Ben-Gurion,” while taking public money and giving it to their friends in the Yesha Council. “Real Zionism,” she said “means dividing the budget equally among all the citizens of the country. Real Zionism is taking care of the weak. Real Zionism is solidarity, not only in battle but in everyday life.” Shaffir was responding to Naftali Bennett and Binyamin Netanyahu’s attack on the Zionist camp for being “Anti-Zionist.” Both Bennett and Netanyahu picked a list of candidates on Labor’s list and labeled them anti-Zionist: MK Merav Michaeli once said Israeli mothers should not send their sons to the army; MK Stav Shaffir, according to a book on the 2011 social protests, called “Hatikva” a racist song; Prof. Yossi Yona said he does not connect to the concept of Zionism; Zouheir Bahloul said his Palestinian identity is stronger than his Israeli identity. Bennett called on former President Yitzhak Navon not to join the Zionist Camp list in the honorary last place (120). “This is not a ‘Zionist Camp’, nor is it Zionism,” Bennett declared.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Center
    In Search of the Center By Dahlia Scheindlin After the Second Intifada (2000-2005), Israel appeared to be hurtling towards rightwing politics with no end in sight. From 2009, the towering figurehead of the right, Benjamin Netanyahu, won election after election. As public sentiment veered to the right, parties competed for extreme nationalist and expansionist policies, and there seemed to be no stopping the trend. Yet the party that finally came close to beating Netanyahu in April 2019, then surpassed Likud in a second round in September that year, was not a competitor from the right but a rival from the Israeli center. Blue and White was an unlikely challenger. The party was cobbled together ad hoc ahead of the April 2019 elections, led by three former generals with no obvious political ideology, party institutions or base of support beyond the voters of one of the constituent parties in its joint slate, Yesh Atid. The latter was largely viewed as center-left. Yet somehow, voters knew instinctively where Blue and White fit on Israel’s map – the center. The party’s own leaders worked hard to convey a centrist image as their brand, as well. But do centrist political movements ever succeed in Israel? Can a centrist party become a defining force of Israeli politics, and if so, what exactly does centrism mean in Israel? The Pull of the Center On the face of it, centrist politics sound like a potential antidote to Israel’s notoriously polarized, fragmented, and aggressive political culture. A center party could become a vehicle to promote moderation and pragmatic policies, in theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Really, 'Human Dust'?
    Notes INTRODUCTION 1. Peck, The Lost Heritage of the Holocaust Survivors, Gesher, 106 (1982) p.107. 2. For 'Herut's' place in this matter, see H. T. Yablonka, 'The Commander of the Yizkor Order, Herut, Shoa and Survivors', in I. Troen and N. Lucas (eds.) Israel the First Decade, New York: SUNY Press, 1995. 3. Heller, On Struggling for Nationhood, p. 66. 4. Z. Mankowitz, Zionism and the Holocaust Survivors; Y. Gutman and A. Drechsler (eds.) She'erit Haplita, 1944-1948. Proceedings of the Sixth Yad Vas hem International Historical Conference, Jerusalem 1991, pp. 189-90. 5. Proudfoot, 'European Refugees', pp. 238-9, 339-41; Grossman, The Exiles, pp. 10-11. 6. Gutman, Jews in Poland, pp. 65-103. 7. Dinnerstein, America and the Survivors, pp. 39-71. 8. Slutsky, Annals of the Haganah, B, p. 1114. 9. Heller The Struggle for the Jewish State, pp. 82-5. 10. Bauer, Survivors; Tsemerion, Holocaust Survivors Press. 11. Mankowitz, op. cit., p. 190. REALLY, 'HUMAN DUST'? 1. Many of the sources posed problems concerning numerical data on immi­ gration, especially for the months leading up to the end of the British Mandate, January-April 1948, and the first few months of the state, May­ August 1948. The researchers point out that 7,574 immigrant data cards are missing from the records and believe this to be due to the 'circumstances of the times'. Records are complete from September 1948 onward, and an important population census was held in November 1948. A parallel record­ ing system conducted by the Jewish Agency, which continued to operate after that of the Mandatory Government, provided us with statistical data for immigration during 1948-9 and made it possible to analyse the part taken by the Holocaust survivors.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Excluded, for God's Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel
    Excluded, For God’s Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel המרכז הרפורמי לדת ומדינה -לוגו ללא מספר. Third Annual Report – December 2013 Israel Religious Action Center Israel Movement for Reform and Progressive Judaism Excluded, For God’s Sake: Gender Segregation and the Exclusion of Women in Public Space in Israel Third Annual Report – December 2013 Written by: Attorney Ruth Carmi, Attorney Ricky Shapira-Rosenberg Consultation: Attorney Einat Hurwitz, Attorney Orly Erez-Lahovsky English translation: Shaul Vardi Cover photo: Tomer Appelbaum, Haaretz, September 29, 2010 – © Haaretz Newspaper Ltd. © 2014 Israel Religious Action Center, Israel Movement for Reform and Progressive Judaism Israel Religious Action Center 13 King David St., P.O.B. 31936, Jerusalem 91319 Telephone: 02-6203323 | Fax: 03-6256260 www.irac.org | [email protected] Acknowledgement In loving memory of Dick England z"l, Sherry Levy-Reiner z"l, and Carole Chaiken z"l. May their memories be blessed. With special thanks to Loni Rush for her contribution to this report IRAC's work against gender segregation and the exclusion of women is made possible by the support of the following people and organizations: Kathryn Ames Foundation Claudia Bach Philip and Muriel Berman Foundation Bildstein Memorial Fund Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc. Donald and Carole Chaiken Foundation Isabel Dunst Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation Eugene J. Eder Charitable Foundation John and Noeleen Cohen Richard and Lois England Family Jay and Shoshana Dweck Foundation Foundation Lewis Eigen and Ramona Arnett Edith Everett Finchley Reform Synagogue, London Jim and Sue Klau Gold Family Foundation FJC- A Foundation of Philanthropic Funds Vicki and John Goldwyn Mark and Peachy Levy Robert Goodman & Jayne Lipman Joseph and Harvey Meyerhoff Family Richard and Lois Gunther Family Foundation Charitable Funds Richard and Barbara Harrison Yocheved Mintz (Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine About the Author
    PALESTINE ABOUT THE AUTHOR Professor Nur Masalha is a Palestinian historian and a member of the Centre for Palestine Studies, SOAS, University of London. He is also editor of the Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies. His books include Expulsion of the Palestinians (1992); A Land Without a People (1997); The Politics of Denial (2003); The Bible and Zionism (Zed 2007) and The Pales- tine Nakba (Zed 2012). PALESTINE A FOUR THOUSAND YEAR HISTORY NUR MASALHA Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History was first published in 2018 by Zed Books Ltd, The Foundry, 17 Oval Way, London SE11 5RR, UK. www.zedbooks.net Copyright © Nur Masalha 2018. The right of Nur Masalha to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro by seagulls.net Index by Nur Masalha Cover design © De Agostini Picture Library/Getty All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of Zed Books Ltd. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978‑1‑78699‑272‑7 hb ISBN 978‑1‑78699‑274‑1 pdf ISBN 978‑1‑78699‑275‑8 epub ISBN 978‑1‑78699‑276‑5 mobi CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction 1 1. The Philistines and Philistia as a distinct geo‑political entity: 55 Late Bronze Age to 500 BC 2. The conception of Palestine in Classical Antiquity and 71 during the Hellenistic Empires (500‒135 BC) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • City Research Online
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Masri, M. (2013). Love Suspended: Demography, Comparative Law, and Palestinian Couples in the Israeli Supreme Court. Social and Legal Studies: An International Journal, 22(3), pp. 309-334. doi: 10.1177/0964663912472095 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/4948/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0964663912472095 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Love Suspended: Demography, Comparative Law, and Palestinian Couples in the Israeli Supreme Court Abstract This article considers a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Israel dealing with the right to family unification of Palestinian citizens of Israel (PCI). By situating the decision in the broader debate on Israel’s constitutional definition as a Jewish and democratic state, the article examines patterns where the definition plays an important role in defining the nature of the citizenship held by PCI, and the limits of their rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Master of the Science of Law
    TO CONCUR, OR NOT TO CONCUR: THAT IS THE QUESTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL QUESTIONS REGARDING THE JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES APPOINTED TEMPORARILY TO THE ISRAELI SUPREME COURT A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE STANFORD PROGRAM IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STUDIES AT THE STANFORD LAW SCHOOL, STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF THE SCIENCE OF LAW By Binyamin Blum © May 2006 Please do not cite without permission of author ABSTRACT In many democratic societies, judicial tenure is perceived to be an important safeguard for the judiciary’s independence. In Israel, although judicial tenure is secured under Basic Law: The Judiciary, the promotion of judges from Israel’s District Courts to the Supreme Court is usually preceded by a temporary appointment. In practice, this temporary appointment serves as a “probationary period” after which the judges are considered for the permanent position of Associate Justice. One of the important implications of this promotion system is that while serving on Israel’s highest court, temporarily appointed judges continue to depend on external forces to retain their offices. Therefore, I argue that from a theoretical standpoint, temporary appointments pose a substantial threat to the judicial independence of individual judges. Because of the significant role played by Supreme Court Justices in the appointment process, I identify the threat to judicial independence as primarily originating within the judiciary, rather than from other branches of government. The major objective of this study is to examine the degree to which the theoretical threat to internal judicial independence can be seen to materialize in the Israeli Supreme Court example.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATE of ISRAEL 70 YEARS of INDEPENDENCE - Building a Nation
    1 The Zionist General Council Session XXXVII/4 THE STATE OF ISRAEL 70 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE - Building a Nation October 2018 2 Plenary No. 1 - Opening of the Zionist General Council Session Eli Cohen opened the first session and thanked the members of the audit committee and praised the auditor and his team, who - in their attempt to reach a level of satisfaction, which all can find to be acceptable - see all the flaws and improvements. Rabbi Yehiel Wasserman was invited to the stage for a ceremony conferring honorary fellowships to various members for their activities in the Zionist movement and their significant contribution to shaping its path and activities. This year, thanks to the WZO’s extensive activity over the past decade, quite a few people will be receiving this status. Honorary fellows are highly motivated individuals who have devoted many years of their time to the Zionist movement and who are role models for the next generation. Rabbi Wasserman then thanked the members of the Committee for Honorary Fellows: Barbara Goldstein, Silvio Joskowicz, Dalia Levy, Karma Cohen, Hernan Felman, Jacques Kupfer and Nava Avissar, the committee’s coordinator, for their dedicated work. Honorary Fellows: Mrs. Ana Marlene Starec – Mrs. Starec has been active in the Zionist movement for the past 54 years. She has been serving as Honorary President of WIZO for many years now and is also engaged in advocacy activities for Israel in the Diaspora in general, and with the Jewish communities of Brazil, in particular. Her human rights activities earned her a medal from the state of Rio de Janeiro, and she has also received a medal from the French Senate for her activities for humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Israelis and Palestinians Seeking, Building and Representing Peace
    ! ! Israelis and Palestinians Seeking, Building and Representing Peace. A Historical Appraisal Ed. by Marcella Simoni Issue n. 5, July 2013 QUEST N. 5 QUEST. Issues in Contemporary Jewish History Journal of Fondazione CDEC Editors Michele Sarfatti (Fondazione CDEC, managing editor), Tullia Catalan (Università di Trieste), Cristiana Facchini (Università Alma Mater, Bologna), Marcella Simoni (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), Guri Schwarz (Università di Pisa), Ulrich Wyrwa (Zentrum für Antisemitismusforschung, Berlin). Editorial Assistant Laura Brazzo (Fondazione CDEC) Editorial Advisory Board Ruth Ben Ghiat (New York University), Paolo Luca Bernardini (Università dell’Insubria), Dominique Bourel (Université de la Sorbonne, Paris), Michael Brenner (Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München), Enzo Campelli (Università La Sapienza di Roma), Francesco Cassata (Università di Genova), David Cesarani (Royal Holloway College, London), Roberto Della Rocca (DEC, Roma), Lois Dubin (Smith College, Northampton), Jacques Ehrenfreund (Université de Lausanne), Katherine E. Fleming (New York University), Anna Foa (Università La Sapienza di Roma), François Guesnet (University College London), Alessandro Guetta (INALCO, Paris), Stefano Jesurum (Corriere della Sera, Milano), András Kovács (Central European University, Budapest), Fabio Levi (Università degli Studi di Torino), Simon Levis Sullam (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), Renato Mannheimer (ISPO, Milano), Giovanni Miccoli (Università degli Studi di Trieste), Dan Michman (Yad Vashem, Jerusalem), Michael Miller (Central European University, Budapest), Alessandra Minerbi (Fondazione CDEC Milano), Liliana Picciotto (Fondazione CDEC, Milano), Micaela Procaccia (MIBAC, Roma), Marcella Ravenna (Università di Ferrara), Milena Santerini (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano), Perrine Simon-Nahum (EHESS, Paris), Francesca Sofia (Università Alma Mater di Bologna), David Sorkin (CUNY, New York), Emanuela Trevisan Semi (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), Christian Wiese (Goethe- Universität Frankfurt am Main).
    [Show full text]
  • Avena Sterilis L.) Abdolmajid Rezai Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1977 Variation for some agronomic traits in the World Collection of wild oats (Avena sterilis L.) Abdolmajid Rezai Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, and the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Rezai, Abdolmajid, "Variation for some agronomic traits in the World Collection of wild oats (Avena sterilis L.) " (1977). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 6103. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/6103 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce ti^.is document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributor Biographies
    155 Contributor Biographies Rabbi Rachel Adler, PhD, is the Ellenson Professor of Modern Jewish Thought at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion in Los Angeles. She was one of the first to bring feminist perspectives to bear on Jewish texts and law. Her book Engendering Judaism (1998) is the first by a female theologian to win a National Jewish Book Award for Jewish Thought. Hadeel Azzam-Jalajel, who was raised in Nazareth, was at the time of writing this essay co-director of the Racism Crisis Center and a lawyer with a private legal practice. She is a grad- uate of the Law School of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. She interned at the civil rights organization Hamoked: Center for the Defense of the Individual, and since passing the bar in March of 2014, she has focused on administrative and constitu- tional law. Hadeel is a social and political activist, and a member of the leadership of the Jewish-Arab movement Standing Together, which works to promote peace, equality, and social justice. She also works as a content manager in both Hebrew and Arabic for the movement. Ruth Calderon, PhD, is a former member of the Israeli Knesset, former vice-speaker of the Knesset of the opposition party Yesh Atid, a Jewish educator, and Talmud scholar. In 1989, she founded Beit Midrash ELUL and, in 1996, the secular Beit Midrash for He- brew Culture, ALMA. She served as the head of the Division for Culture and Education of the Israeli National Library and on the faculty of the Mandel Institute for Nonprofit Leadership, where she also belonged to the first cohort of students to finish the program.
    [Show full text]