1923: William Z. Foster on the Federated Farmer-Labor Party
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Foster: The Federated Farmer-Labor Party [Aug. 1923] 1 The Federated Farmer-Labor Party. by William Z. Foster Published in The Labor Herald [Chicago], v. 2, no. 6 (August 1923), pp. 2-7. Every decade or so there occurs some labor event self at the head of this rank and file revolt in 1919 by so striking and inspiring in character that it stands out forming the Labor Party, which a year later became as a landmark in the history of the working class. Such the Farmer-Labor Party. A wave of hope spread was the great national convention held in Chicago, throughout the labor movement. At last, it was July 3-4-5 [1923], to create a labor party. Marked by a thought, the workers were about to set themselves free tremendous outburst of militancy and en- thusiasm, it was a vi- brant, thrilling, over- whelming demand by the rank and file of ag- ricultural and indus- trial labor for the for- mation of a powerful political party of the toilers. Nobody who attended its sessions will ever forget them. This revolution- ary convention, called under the auspices of the Farmer-Labor Party, gave birth to a new organiza- from the political thralldom fastened upon them by tion, the Federated Farmer-Labor Party. It was the in- the Gompers clique and would organize a party of their evitable culmination of a long train of circumstances. own. But the hope soon died. Through lack of mili- For many years past the workers, betrayed and misled tancy the Farmer-Labor Party failed to crystallize the by the trade union bureaucracy, had been gradually labor party sentiment. It simmered along and frittered awakening to the fact that the old Gompersian politi- away its great opportunity. cal policy of “rewarding” their friends and “punish- ing” their enemies was fatal to their interests. It had The Progressive Conference. disfranchised the working class and had turned the entire governmental machinery, lock, stock, and bar- Then the movement for a labor party took a new rel, over to the exploiting class. More and more the turn. William H. Johnson, President of the Interna- rank and file began to demand the formation of a tional Association of Machinists, came forward as the workers’ political party. Local labor parties sprang up great champion of the idea. During late 1921 and early here and there, east and west. John Fitzpatrick, Presi- 1922 one big international union after another de- dent of the Chicago Federation of Labor, placed him- clared in favor of independent working class political 1 2 Foster: The Federated Farmer-Labor Party [Aug. 1923] action. Again hope revived, and many looked towards its leaders pulled their party out of that sickly body. Johnston as the Moses who would lead the workers Almost immediately everyone who believed sincerely out of the political wilderness. It almost seemed as in the formation of a labor party turned his attention though, under his leadership, even the higher union again to the Farmer-Labor Party. Meanwhile the Work- officials had begun to realize the necessity for a labor ers Party and the Trade Union Educational League had party and were willing to brave the opposition of the been carrying on a militant and widespread campaign old autocrat, Gompers, in order to achieve it. The in the unions for independent working class political movement came to a head in February 1922, when action. Great numbers of local unions, city centrals, the first Conference for Progressive Political Action was state federations of labor, and international unions were held in Chicago. There was present an imposing show won over to the cause. Particularly effective in devel- of proletarian strength, including the sixteen railroad oping this sentiment was the great national labor party organizations, the United Mine Workers of America, referendum sent out by the Trade Union Educational the International Typographical Union, the Amalgam- League to 35,000 local unions. In fact, it was very ated Clothing Workers, several smaller internationals, largely because of the success of this referendum that two dozen State Federations of Labor, scores of cen- the officials of the Farmer-Labor Party moved to crys- tral labor councils, the Non-Partisan League and a great tallize the rapidly spreading movement for a labor party. number of other farmer organizations, the Farmer- They issued their call for a “monster political conven- Labor Party, the Socialist Party, etc., etc. A conserva- tion” to which all “labor, farm, and political groups,” tive figure for those represented would be 2,500,000, both local and national, were invited to send delegates and the whole lot were following the lead of Johnston. “for the purpose of devising means for knitting to- gether the many organizations in this country in such The Johnston Betrayal. a manner as will enable the workers to really function politically.” It was a golden opportunity to form the labor party. Just a little leadership and courage on the part The Farmer-Labor Party Revives. of Johnston and the thing would have been done. But he lacked both. Although he hated Gompers bitterly This was an inspiring gesture. Hope for a labor and had the forces wherewith to overthrow him and party, long deferred, revived again. Apparently the his reactionary political policy, he did not dare to un- Farmer-Labor Party, freeing itself from the lassitude dertake the job. The Chicago conference did nothing that had crippled it from its birth, had finally come to practical. After adopting a sickly parody on the Decla- realize that the labor party issue, like amalgamation, ration of Independence, it adjourned to meet again in was purely a rank and file question and had determined Cleveland in December of the same year. Everybody to make a bold fight for it among the broad masses in with a bit of sand in him was disgusted. But still a ray the unions. Many circumstances had conspired to make of hope lingered. Those who did not know the weak this conclusion seem plausible. Years ago the Farmer- Johnston felt that perhaps he wanted further time to Labor Party had broken with the Gompers clique of build up more troops for the final assault on the Gom- officials, and after the Cleveland conference it parted pers stronghold. Then came the Cleveland fiasco, company with the remainder of the higher officialdom, which ended by Johnston and his lieutenants timidly the Johnston group. This should have convinced it that endorsing the threadbare Gompers policy. Thus that there was nothing to be looked for from the bureau- promising movement blew up. It was the old story of cracy of the trade unions and that the only thing left the fabled general who, with a lot of horses and men, for it was to make a militant appeal to the great rank marched them up the hill and marched them down and file. Its logical role was to lead a vigorous labor again. party struggle in all the organizations and to put across At this critical juncture the Farmer-Labor Party the program of independent working class political again came strongly to the fore. Denouncing the Con- action in spite of the opposition of the entire official ference for Progressive Political Action as a scab outfit, family. It was a splendid opportunity and a solemn Foster: The Federated Farmer-Labor Party [Aug. 1923] 3 responsibility, demanding foresight, initiative, and dar- nant to them, or of practically repeating the Cleve- ing. But events proved that the national leadership of land fiasco by doing nothing to form the proposed the Farmer-Labor Party failed completely to under- federated party. stand the situation or to live up to its requirements. It was under such circumstances that the memo- rable convention came together in the big Carmen’s The Farmer-Labor Party Weakens. Auditorium. The number of delegates has been vari- ously estimated from 600 to 800. They represented at The militant and revolutionary elements in the least 600,000 workers, members of all sorts of agricul- labor movement took seriously the Farmer-Labor tural and industrial organizations. High international Party’s gesture of revolt. They thought that body was officials of the unions were conspicuous by their ab- in earnest and prepared to accept the consequences of sence, most of the labor representation coming from its acts when it boldly denounced the Cleveland Con- local unions and central labor councils. From the be- ference for not forming a labor party and then called ginning it was manifest that the delegation, disillu- together a great rank and file convention to crease such sioned by the Cleveland failure, was determined that a party. So these militants worked vigorously and ef- a real start should be made towards the foundation of fectively to make the convention a success. On the a genuine federated labor party, to which all working other hand, the Farmer-Labor Party leaders, with few class political and industrial groups might affiliate. exceptions, never entered into the spirit of the con- vention. They did practically nothing to build it up. The First Day. Many even sabotaged it outright. Their trouble was that ideologically they belonged in the left wing of the In this situation the cue was for the Farmer-La- Johnston Conference for Progressive Political Action. bor Party leaders, despite the rank and file character of Although the whole higher officialdom of our labor the Convention, to place themselves boldly at the head movement had declared against forming a labor party, of the movement by forming immediately the all-in- the Farmer-Labor Party leaders could not quite give clusive federated party, and by launching a militant up the hope that this officialdom, in some way or other, campaign to win affiliations for it.